Standard German phonology

Template:Short description Template:WikiIPA Template:IPA notice The Standard German phonology is the standard pronunciation or accent of the German language. It deals with current phonology and phonetics as well as with historical developments thereof as well as the geographical variants and the influence of German dialects.

While the spelling of German is officially standardised by an international organisation (the Council for German Orthography) the pronunciation has no official standard and relies on a de facto standard documented in reference works such as (German Pronunciation Dictionary) by Eva-Maria Krech et al., (Duden volume 6, The Pronunciation Dictionary) by Max Mangold and the training materials of radio and television stations such as Westdeutscher Rundfunk, Deutschlandfunk, or Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen. This standardised pronunciation was invented, rather than coming from any particular German-speaking city. But the pronunciation that Germans usually consider to be closest to the standard is that of Hanover. Standard German is sometimes referred to as (stage German), but the latter has its own definition and is slightly different.

Vowels

File:Northern Standard German vowel chart.svg

Monophthongs of standard German, from Template:Harvcoltxt

Monophthongs

Monophthong phonemes of Standard German

	Front				Central		Back
	Unrounded		Rounded
	short	long	short	long	short	long	short	long
Close	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link			Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link
Close-mid		Template:IPA link		Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)			Template:IPA link
Open-mid	Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)	Template:IPA link		(Template:IPA link)		Template:IPA link
Open					Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link

Some scholars treat as an unstressed allophone of . Likewise, some scholars treat as an allophone of the sequence or as a vocalic realization of syllabic . The phonemic status of is also debated – see below.

Notes

• Close vowels
  • is close front unrounded Template:IPAblink.
  • is close near-front rounded Template:IPAblink.
  • is close back rounded Template:IPAblink.
  • has been variously described as near-close front unrounded Template:IPAblink and near-close near-front unrounded Template:IPAblink.
  • is near-close near-front rounded Template:IPAblink.
  • is near-close near-back rounded Template:IPAblink.
• Mid vowels
  • is close-mid front unrounded Template:IPAblink.
    • In non-standard accents of the Low German speaking area, as well as in some Bavarian and Austrian accents it may be pronounced as a narrow closing diphthong .
  • has been variously described as close-mid near-front rounded Template:IPAblink and mid near-front rounded Template:IPAblink. One sourceTemplate:Sfnp shows it as considerably centralized on the vowel chart (the one shown above), closer to Template:IPAblink than cardinal Template:IPAblink.
    • In non-standard accents of the Low German speaking area, as well as in some Austrian accents it may be pronounced as a narrow closing diphthong .
  • is close-mid back rounded Template:IPAblink.
    • In non-standard accents of the Low German speaking area, as well as in some Austrian accents it may be pronounced as a narrow closing diphthong .
  • has been variously described as mid central unrounded Template:IPAblink. and close-mid central unrounded Template:IPAblink. It occurs only in unstressed syllables, for instance in ('occupy'). It is often considered a complementary allophone together with Template:IPAblink, which only rarely or regionally occurs in unstressed syllables (e.g. ). If a sonorant follows in the syllable coda, the schwa often disappears so that the sonorant becomes syllabic, for instance ('pillow'), ('donkey'). However, Standard German spoken in Luxembourg often lacks syllabic sonorants under the influence of Luxembourgish, so that e.g. ('put') is pronounced , rather than .Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp
  • has been variously described as mid near-front unrounded Template:IPAblink and open-mid front unrounded Template:IPAblink.
  • has been variously described as mid front unrounded Template:IPAblink and open-mid front unrounded Template:IPAblink.
  • has been variously described as open-mid near-front rounded Template:IPAblink and somewhat lowered open-mid near-front rounded Template:IPAblink.
  • has been variously described as somewhat fronted open-mid back rounded Template:IPAblink and open-mid back rounded Template:IPAblink.
• Open vowels
  • is near-open central unrounded Template:IPAblink. It is a common allophone of the sequence common to all German-speaking areas but Switzerland. As schwa /ə/ is never pronounced here, it is also possible to interpret Template:IPAblink as the vocalic allophone of the syllabic sonorant /r̩/.
  • has been variously described as open front unrounded Template:IPAblink and open central unrounded Template:IPAblink. Some scholars differentiate two short , namely front and back . The latter occurs only in unstressed open syllables, exactly as .
    • Standard Austrian pronunciation of this vowel is back Template:IPAblink.
    • Front Template:IPAblink or even Template:IPAblink is a common realization of in northern German varieties influenced by Low German.
  • has been variously described as open central unrounded Template:IPAblink and open back unrounded Template:IPAblink. Because of this, it is sometimes transcribed .
    • Back Template:IPAblink is the Standard Austrian pronunciation. It is also a common realization of in northern German varieties influenced by Low German (in which it may even be rounded Template:IPAblink).
  • Template:Harvcoltxt notes that "there is a tendency to neutralize the distinction between , , and . That is, , , and have final syllables which are perceptually very similar, and are nearly or completely identical in some dialects." He also says that "outside of a word context, cannot be distinguished from . (As early as 1847, Verdi's librettist found it natural, when adapting a play by Schiller into the Italian language, to render the distinctly German name Roller as Rolla.)
  • According to the 7th edition of Das Aussprachewörterbuch, the standard pronunciation differentiates from unstressed (which typically belongs to phoneme, see below). The authors claim that the difference is one of height: Template:IPAblink vs. Template:IPAblink. However, they tend to be neutralized in the Berlin/Brandenburg Metropolitan Region towards an open central Template:IPAblink. Conversely, in southern Germany, is often realized as Template:IPAblink (in turn, Standard is often closer to Template:IPAblink). In Franconia and partially also in the coastal regions of Germany, the vowel is closer to Template:IPAblink, whereas in west-central Germany it is slightly more open, that is Template:IPAblink. In each case but the first one, is strongly differentiated from . In regions without r-vocalization, the difference is always present.Template:Sfnp
  • According to a 2020 study, is not distinguished from unstressed in Northern Standard German. Word pairs such as 'opera' (traditionally transcribed ) and 'grandpa' (traditionally transcribed ) are thus homophones (as ), rather than minimal pairs. The merged vowel has a centralized quality Template:IPAblink. The authors of the study advocate for ditching the distinction in transcriptions aimed at foreign learners of German. This neutralization may not apply to all dialects with r-vocalization, particularly the southern ones.Template:Sfnp

Although there is also a length contrast, vowels are often analyzed according to a tenseness contrast, with long being the tense vowels and short their lax counterparts. Like the English checked vowels, the German lax vowels require a following consonant, with the notable exception of (which is absent in many varieties, as discussed below). is sometimes considered the lax counterpart of tense in order to maintain this tense/lax division. Short occur in unstressed syllables of loanwords, for instance in ('psychometry'). They are usually considered allophones of tense vowels (thus ), which cannot occur in unstressed syllables (unless in compounds). is similarly shortened in those positions, with the difference being that it is shortened also in native words, such as aforementioned 'grandpa' (phonemically ).

In dialects with r-vocalization, historical (phonetically typically a long monophthong Template:IPAblink) may undergo a shortening akin to when unstressed, as in one pronunciation of 'radar' as (phonemically ). An analogous process has taken place in Danish, as in the cognate , meaning the same.

Northern German varieties influenced by Low German could be analyzed as lacking contrasting vowel quantity entirely:

• has a different quality than (see above).
• These varieties also consistently lack , and use only in its place.Template:Category handlerTemplate:Category handler

Phonemic status of

The existence of a phoneme in German is disputed.Template:Sfn The distinction between the long lax and the long tense does not exist in some varieties of Standard German, and many authors treat the phoneme as peripheral and regard a distinction between it and as a spelling pronunciation.Template:Sfn Most commonly, they are merged before an intervocalic , so that potential minimal pairs such as 'ear of grain' and 'honor' or 'bears' and 'berries' are rendered homophonous, as and . Some authors claim that no distinction between and is possible in this position unless in hypercorrect pronunciation, in which and may be pronounced and , with a tense .Template:Sfnp Other authors claim that there is regional variation, a distinction occurring especially in southern varieties of Standard German.Template:Sfnp In contexts other than before intervocalic , the contrast between and is more stable, so that 'bid, conjunctive', 'Danes' and ('saws, n.') may be differentiated from 'to pray', 'to stretch' and 'blessing'. Even here the vowels can merge, but to a tense : .Template:Sfnp Scholars who question the existence of a phoneme do so for the following reasons:

1. The existence of a phoneme is an irregularity in a vowel system that otherwise has pairs of long and tense vs. short and lax vowels such as vs. .Template:Sfn On the other hand, such irregularities are not ruled out by any principle.
2. The phoneme has developed out of the spelling of the language rather than from any historical sound change.Template:Sfn Most examples of Middle High German /ǣ/ correspond to New High German rather than , indicating that the modern is not a regular development.Template:Sfn
3. Although some dialects (e.g. Ripuarian and some Alemannic dialects) have an opposition of vs. , their usage does not follow that of the standard.Template:Sfn There is also little agreement across dialects as to whether individual lexical items should be pronounced with or with . E.g. South Hessian dialects have in Käse but in Leben.Template:Better source needed
4. The use of is a spelling pronunciation rather than an original feature of the language. It is an attempt to "speak as printed" () and to differentiate the spellings Template:Angbr and Template:Angbr (i.e. speakers attempt to justify the appearance of Template:Angbr and Template:Angbr in writing by making them distinct in the spoken language).Template:Sfn

Diphthongs

Phonemic

File:Northern Standard German diphthong chart.svg

Diphthongs of standard German, from Template:Harvcoltxt

	Ending point
	Front	Back
Near-close	()
Open-mid
Open

• has been variously described as , and .
• has been variously described as , , and .
• has been variously described as , , and .
• is found only in a handful of interjections such as and , and as an alternative to disyllabic in words such as .Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Phonetic

The following usually are not counted among the German diphthongs as German speakers often feel they are distinct marks of "foreign words" (). These appear only in loanwords:

• , as in , colloquially: .
• Many German speakers use and as adaptations of the English diphthongs Template:IPAc-en and Template:IPAc-en in English loanwords, according to Template:Harvcoltxt, or they replace them with the native German long vowels and . Thus, the word may be pronounced or . However, Template:Harvcoltxt and Template:Harvcoltxt do not recognize these diphthongs as phonemes, and prescribe pronunciations with the long vowels and instead.

In the varieties where speakers vocalize to Template:IPAblink in the syllable coda, a diphthong ending in may be formed with every stressable vowel:

File:German ɐ diphthongs chart - part 1.svg

German diphthongs ending in (part 1), from Template:Harvcoltxt

File:German ɐ diphthongs chart - part 2.svg

German diphthongs ending in (part 2), from Template:Harvcoltxt

R-vocalization in Standard German

Diphthong		Example
Phonemically	Phonetically	IPA	Orthography	Translation
				he/she/it becomes
	1			we
				dignity
	1			for
				I/he/she/it became
	1			holiday
				Erft
	2			Opera
	1			bear
	1			more
				he/she/it dries
	1			(thou) hear!
				north
	1			gate
				hard
	1			true

^1 Template:Harvcoltxt notes that the length contrast is not very stable before non-prevocalic and that "Template:Harvcoltxt, following the pronouncing dictionaries (Template:Harvcoltxt, Template:Harvcoltxt) judge the vowel in , , to be long, while the vowel in , , is supposed to be short. The factual basis of this presumed distinction seems very questionable." He goes on stating that in his own dialect, there is no length difference in these words, and that judgements on vowel length in front of non-prevocalic which is itself vocalized are problematic, in particular if precedes.

According to the "lengthless" analysis, the aforementioned "long" diphthongs are analyzed as , , , , , , and . This makes non-prevocalic and homophonous as or . Non-prevocalic and may also merge, but the vowel chart in Template:Harvcoltxt shows that they have somewhat different starting points – mid-centralized open-mid front Template:IPAblink for the former, open-mid front Template:IPAblink for the latter.

Template:Harvcoltxt also states that "laxing of the vowel is predicted to take place in shortened vowels; it does indeed seem to go hand in hand with the vowel shortening in many cases." This leads to , , , , , being pronounced the same as , , , , , . This merger is usual in the Standard Austrian accent, in which e.g. 'bog' is often pronounced ; this, in contrast with the Standard Northern variety, also happens intervocalically, along with the diphthongization of the laxed vowel to , so that e.g. 'teacher' is pronounced (the corresponding Standard Northern pronunciation is ). Another feature of the Standard Austrian accent is complete absorption of by the preceding , so that e.g. 'scarce' is pronounced .

^2 At the end of words only.

Consonants

With around 22 to 26 phonemes, the German consonant system has an average number of consonants in comparison with other languages. One of the more noteworthy ones is the unusual affricate .

		Labial	Alveolar	Post- alveolar	Palatal	Velar/ Uvular	Glottal
Nasal		Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link			Template:IPA link
Plosive	Fortis	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link			Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)
	Lenis	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link			Template:IPA link
Affricate	Fortis	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link
	Lenis			(Template:IPA link)
Fricative	Fortis	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)	Template:IPA link
	Lenis	Template:IPA link	Template:IPA link	(Template:IPA link)
Approximant			Template:IPA link		Template:IPA link
Rhotic

• can be uvular, alveolar or even dental, a consonant or a semivowel, see below.
• is bilabial–labiodental , rather than purely labiodental .
• are voiceless in Austrian Standard German and in most other South German varieties.
• can be apical alveolar , laminal alveolar or laminal denti-alveolar . The other possible pronunciation of that has been reported to occur in unstressed intervocalic positions is retroflex Template:IPAblink. Austrian German often uses laminal denti-alveolar articulation.
• is always clear , as in most Irish English accents. A few Austrian accents may use a velarized instead, but that is considered non-standard.
• In the Standard Austrian variety, may be affricated to Template:IPAblink before front vowels.
• can be laminal alveolar , laminal post-dental (i.e. fronted alveolar, articulated with the blade of the tongue just behind upper front teeth), or even apical alveolar . are always strongly fricated. Austrian German often uses the post-dental articulation for .
• are strongly labialized palato-alveolar sibilants . are fricated more weakly than . There are two variants of these sounds:
  • Laminal, articulated with the foremost part of the blade of the tongue approaching the foremost part of the hard palate, with the tip of the tongue resting behind either upper or lower front teeth.
  • Apico-laminal, articulated with the tip of the tongue approaching the gums and the foremost part of the blade approaching the foremost part of the hard palate. According to Template:Harvcoltxt, this variant is used more frequently.
• has a number of possible realizations:
  • Voiced apical coronal trill , either alveolar (articulated with the tip of the tongue against the alveolar ridge), or dental (articulated with the tip of the tongue against the back of the upper front teeth).
    • Distribution: Common in the south (Bavaria and many parts of Switzerland and Austria), but it is also found in some speakers in central and northern Germany, especially the elderly. It is also one of possible realizations of in the Standard Austrian accent, but a more common alveolar realization is an approximant Template:IPAblink. Even more common are uvular realizations, fricatives and a trill Template:IPAblink.
  • Voiced uvular trill Template:IPAblink, which can be realized as voiceless Template:IPAblink after voiceless consonants (as in ). According to Template:Harvcoltxt it is often a flap Template:IPAblink intervocalically (as in ).
    • Distribution: Occurs in some conservative varieties—most speakers with a uvular realize it as a fricative or an approximant. It is also one of possible realizations of in the Standard Austrian accent, but it is less common than a fricative .
  • Dorsal continuant, about the quality of which there is not a complete agreement:
    • Template:Harvcoltxt describe two fricative variants, namely post-palatal and velar . The post-palatal variant appears before and after front vowels, while the velar variant is used in all other positions.
    • Template:Harvcoltxt describe it as a voiced post-velar fricative .
    • Template:Harvcoltxt and Template:Harvcoltxt describe it as a voiced uvular fricative ;
      • Template:Harvcoltxt states that "with educated professional radio and TV announcers, as with professional actors on the stage and in film, the [voiced uvular] fricative [realization of] clearly predominates."
        • In the Standard Austrian accent, the uvular fricative is also the most common realization, although its voicing is variable (that is, it can be either voiced Template:IPAblink or voiceless Template:IPAblink).
      • Template:Harvcoltxt writes that "the place of articulation of the consonant varies from uvular in e.g. ('red') to velar in e.g. ('kick'), depending on back or front vowel contexts." He also notes that Template:IPAblink is devoiced after voiceless plosives and fricatives, especially those within the same word, giving the word as an example. According to this author, can be reduced to an approximant in an intervocalic position.
    • Template:Harvcoltxt describe it as a uvular fricative or approximant . The latter is less likely to occur word-initially.
    • Distribution: Almost all areas apart from Bavaria and parts of Switzerland.
  • Near-open central unrounded vowel Template:IPAblink is a post-vocalic allophone of (mostly dorsal) varieties of . The non-syllabic variant of it is not always near-open or central; it is similar to either Template:IPAblink or Template:IPAblink, depending on the environment.
    • Distribution: Widespread, but less common in Switzerland.
  • Retroflex approximant [ɻ⁠] realized like the r in Standard American English.
    • Distribution: Middle Hessian between the Wetterau region and the Westerwald and the Higher Lusatia.
• The voiceless stops Template:IPAslink, Template:IPAslink, Template:IPAslink are aspirated except when preceded by a sibilant. Many southern dialects do not aspirate , and some northern ones do so only in a stressed position. The voiceless affricates , , and are never aspirated, and neither are any other consonants besides the aforementioned .
• The obstruents are voiceless lenis consonants in southern varieties. Voiceless lenis consonants continue to contrast with voiceless fortis consonants . The section Template:Slink covers the issue in more detail.
• In Austria, intervocalic can be lenited to fricatives .
• Before and after front vowels ( and, in varieties that realize them as front, and/or ), the velar consonants are realized as post-palatal . According to Template:Harvcoltxt, in a parallel process, before and after back vowels ( and, in varieties that realize them as back, and/or ) are retracted to post-velar or even uvular .
• There is no complete agreement about the nature of ; it has been variously described as:
  • a fricative Template:IPAblink,
  • a fricative which can be fricated less strongly than Template:IPAblink,
  • a sound variable between a weak fricative and an approximant, and
  • an approximant Template:IPAblink, which is the usual realization in the Standard Austrian variety.
• In many varieties of standard German, the glottal stop, Template:IPAblink, occurs in careful speech before word stems that begin with a vowel and before stressed vowels word-internally, as in Oase [ʔo.ʔaː.zə] (twice). It is much more frequent in northern varieties than in the south. It is not usually considered a phoneme. In colloquial and dialectal speech, is often omitted, especially when the word beginning with a vowel is unstressed.
• The phonemic status of affricates is controversial. The majority view accepts Template:IPAslink and Template:IPAslink, but not Template:IPAslink or the non-native Template:IPAslink; some accept none, some accept all but Template:IPAslink, and some accept all.
  • Although Template:IPAblink occurs in native words, it only appears in historic clusters of Template:IPAslink + Template:IPAslink (e.g. deutsch < OHG diutisc) or in words with expressive quality (e.g. glitschen, hutschen). is, however, well-established in loanwords, including German toponyms of non-Germanic origin (e.g. Zschopau).
  • Template:IPAblink and Template:IPAblink occur only in words of foreign origin. In certain varieties, they are replaced by Template:IPAblink and Template:IPAblink altogether.
• Template:IPAblink is occasionally considered to be an allophone of Template:IPAslink, especially in southern varieties of German.
• Template:IPAblink and Template:IPAblink are traditionally regarded as allophones after front vowels and back vowels, respectively. For a more detailed analysis see below at ich-Laut and ach-Laut. According to some analyses, Template:IPAblink is an allophone of Template:IPAslink after and according to some also after . However, according to Template:Harvcoltxt, the uvular allophone is used after only in the Standard Austrian variety.
• Some phonologists do not posit a separate phoneme Template:IPAslink and use instead, along with instead of . The phoneme sequence is realized as when Template:IPAslink can start a valid onset of the next syllable whose nucleus is a vowel other than unstressed Template:IPAslink, Template:IPAslink, or Template:IPAslink. It becomes Template:IPAblink otherwise. For example:
  • ~

Ich-Laut and ach-Laut

File:Velar fronting after ae.pdf

A map showing the German dialect area with black/white squares indicating the Ich-Laut and the Ach-Laut

is the voiceless palatal fricative Template:IPAblink (which is found in the word 'I'), and is the voiceless velar fricative Template:IPAblink (which is found in the word the interjection 'oh', 'alas'). is the German word for 'sound, phone'. In German, these two sounds are allophones occurring in complementary distribution. The allophone Template:IPAblink occurs after back vowels and (for instance in 'book'), the allophone Template:IPAblink after front vowels (for instance in 'me/myself') and consonants (for instance in 'fear', 'sometimes'). The allophone Template:IPAblink also appears after vocalized Template:Angbr in superregional variants, e.g. in 'fear'. In southeastern regiolects, the is commonly used here, yielding .

In loanwords, the pronunciation of potential fricatives in onsets of stressed syllables varies: in the Northern varieties of standard German, it is Template:IPAblink, while in Southern varieties, it is Template:IPAblink, and in Western varieties, it is Template:IPAblink (for instance in : vs. vs. ).

The diminutive suffix is always pronounced with an . Usually, this ending triggers umlaut (compare for instance 'dog' to 'little dog'), so theoretically, it could only occur after front vowels. However, in some comparatively recent coinings, there is no longer an umlaut, for instance in the word (a diminutive of 'woman'), so that a back vowel is followed by a Template:IPAblink, even though normally it would be followed by a Template:IPAblink, as in ('to smoke'). This exception to the allophonic distribution may be an effect of the morphemic boundary or an example of phonemicization, where erstwhile allophones undergo a split into separate phonemes.

The allophonic distribution of Template:IPAblink after front vowels and Template:IPAblink after other vowels is also found in other languages, such as Scots, e.g. licht 'light', dochter 'daughter', and the same distribution is reconstructed for Middle English. However, it is by no means inevitable: Dutch, Yiddish, and many Southern German dialects retain Template:IPAblink (which can be realized as Template:IPAblink instead) in all positions. It is thus reasonable to assume that Old High German ih, the ancestor of modern , was pronounced with Template:IPAblink rather than Template:IPAblink. While it is impossible to know for certain whether Old English words such as niht (modern night) were pronounced with Template:IPAblink or Template:IPAblink, Template:IPAblink is likely (see Old English phonology).

Despite the phonetic history, the complementary distribution of Template:IPAblink and Template:IPAblink in modern Standard German is better described as backing of Template:IPAslink after a back vowel, rather than fronting of Template:IPAslink after a front vowel, because Template:IPAblink is used in onsets ( 'chemistry') and after consonants ( 'newt'), and is thus the underlying form of the phoneme.

According to Kohler, the German is further differentiated into two allophones, Template:IPAblink and Template:IPAblink: Template:IPAblink occurs after (for instance in 'book') and Template:IPAblink after (for instance in 'brook'), while either Template:IPAblink or Template:IPAblink may occur after , with Template:IPAblink predominating.

In Western varieties, there is a strong tendency to realize Template:IPAslink as unrounded Template:IPAblink or Template:IPAblink, and the phoneme may be confused or merged with Template:IPAslink altogether, secondarily leading to hypercorrection effects where Template:IPAslink is replaced with Template:IPAslink, for instance in , which may be realized as .

Within German dialects, a large variation exists as to the environments which trigger or prevent one realization or the other.Template:Sfnp

Fortis–lenis pairs

Various German consonants occur in pairs at the same place of articulation and in the same manner of articulation, namely the pairs , , , , . These pairs are often called fortis–lenis pairs, since describing them as voiced–voiceless pairs is inadequate. With certain qualifications, , and are also considered fortis–lenis pairs.

Fortis-lenis distinction for is unimportant.

The fortis stops are aspirated in many varieties. The aspiration is strongest in the onset of a stressed syllable (such as 'thaler'), weaker in the onset of an unstressed syllable (such as 'father'), and weakest in the syllable coda (such as in 'seed'). All fortis consonants, i.e. are fully voiceless.

The lenis consonants range from being weakly voiced to almost voiceless after voiceless consonants: ('kasbah'), ('to resign'), ('red-yellow'), ('dropping'), ('intention'), ('wooden jalousie'), ('to chase away'), ('to drop'), ('fruit juice'). Template:Harvcoltxt states that they are "to a large extent voiced" in all other environments, but some studies have found the stops to be voiceless utterance-initially in most dialects (and word-initially if the preceding sounds are voiceless, see above). In these cases, they still contrast with due to the aspiration of the latter. Due to this variability, there are disagreements about the phonological nature of the contrast: while some phonologists analyse the lenes stops as underlyingly voiced, others consider the relevant feature to be tenseness or spreading of the glottis (with the fortis stops being tense or articulated with spread glottis.

are voiceless in most southern varieties of German. For clarity, they are often transcribed as .

The nature of the phonetic difference between the voiceless lenis consonants and the similarly voiceless fortis consonants is controversial. It is generally described as a difference in articulatory force, and occasionally as a difference in articulatory length; for the most part, it is assumed that one of these characteristics implies the other.

In various central and southern varieties, the opposition between fortis and lenis is neutralized in the syllable onset; sometimes just in the onset of stressed syllables, sometimes in all cases.

The pair is not considered a fortis–lenis pair, but a simple voiceless–voiced pair, as Template:IPAslink remains voiced in all varieties, including the Southern varieties that devoice the lenes (with however some exceptions). Generally, the southern Template:IPAslink is realized as the voiced approximant Template:IPAblink. However, there are southern varieties which differentiate between a fortis Template:IPAslink (such as in 'culpable' from Middle High German stræflich) and a lenis Template:IPAslink (, such as in 'polite' from Middle High German hovelîch); this is analogous to the opposition of fortis Template:IPAslink (Template:IPAblink) and lenis .

Coda devoicing

In varieties from Northern Germany, lenis stops in the syllable coda are realized as fortis stops. This does not happen in varieties from Southern Germany, Austria or Switzerland.Template:Refn

Phonologists who believe that the relevant feature behind the fortes-lenes contrast is not phonetic voice have also argued that this cannot be called devoicing in the strict sense of the word because it does not involve the loss of voice. In their view, it can be called coda fortition or a neutralization of fortis and lenis sounds in the coda. Fricatives, on the other hand, are acknowledged to be truly and contrastively voiced in Northern GermanyTemplate:Refn, so they can be said to undergo coda devoicing according to this account as well. It is disputed whether coda devoicing is due to a constraint which specifically operates on syllable codas or whether it arises from constraints which "protect voicing in privileged positions".

Stress

In German words there is always one syllable carrying main stress, with all other syllables either being unstressed or carrying a secondary stress. The position of the main stress syllable has been a matter of debate. Traditionally, word stress is seen as falling onto the first stem syllable. In recent analyses, there is agreement that main stress is placed onto one of the last three (stressable) syllables. Within this three-syllable window, word stress is put regularly onto the second-to-last syllable, the penultimate syllable. However, syllable quantity may modify this pattern: a heavy final or prefinal syllable, i.e., one with a long vowel or with one or more consonants in the syllable coda, will usually attract main stress.

Examples

• final stress: Eleˈfant, Krokoˈdil, Kaˈmel
• penultimate stress: ˈTurban, ˈKonsul, ˈBison
• antepenultimate stress: ˈPinguin, ˈRisiko, ˈMonitor

A set of illustrative examples also stems from Japanese loan words, as these cannot be borrowed with their stress patterns (Japanese has a system of pitch accents, completely different from word stress in Germanic languages):

• final stress: Shoˈgun, Samuˈrai
• penultimate stress: Mitsuˈbishi, Ikeˈbana
• antepenultimate stress: Hiˈroshima, ˈOsaka

A list of Japanese words in German reveals that none of the words with four syllables has initial stress, confirming the three-syllable-window analysis.

Secondary stresses precede the main stress if at least two syllables are present, as in ̩Bib-li- ̩o-the-'ka-rin.

Suffixes, if containing a stressable vowel, are either stressed (-ei, ion, -al, etc.) or unstressed (-ung, -heit, -isch, etc.)

In addition, German uses different stresses for separable prefixes and inseparable prefixes in verbs and words derived from such verbs:

• Words beginning with , , , , , , and a few other inseparable prefixes are stressed on the root.
• Words beginning with the separable prefixes , , , , and most prepositional adverbs are stressed on the prefix.
• Some prefixes, notably , , , and , can function as separable or inseparable prefixes and are stressed or not accordingly.
• A few homographs with such prefixes exist. They are not perfect homophones. Consider the word . As (separable prefix), it means 'to rewrite' and is pronounced , with stress on the first syllable. Its associated noun, is also stressed on the first syllable – . On the other hand, (inseparable prefix) is pronounced , with stress on the second syllable. This word means 'to paraphrase', and its associated noun, is also stressed on the second syllable – . Another example is the word ; with stress on the root () it means 'to drive around (an obstacle in the street)', and with stress on the prefix () it means 'to run down/over' or 'to knock down'.

Acquisition

General

Like all infants, German infants go through a babbling stage in the early phases of phonological acquisition, during which they produce the sounds they will later use in their first words. Phoneme inventories begin with stops, nasals, and vowels; (contrasting) short vowels and liquids appear next, followed by fricatives and affricates, and finally all other consonants and consonant clusters. Children begin to produce protowords near the end of their first year. These words do not approximate adult forms, yet have a specific and consistent meaning. Early word productions are phonetically simple and usually follow the syllable structure CV or CVC, although this generalization has been challenged. The first vowels produced are , , and , followed by , , and , with rounded vowels emerging last. German children often use phonological processes to simplify their early word production. For example, they may delete an unstressed syllable ( 'chocolate' pronounced ), or replace a fricative with a corresponding stop ( 'roof' pronounced ). One case study found that a 17-month-old child acquiring German replaced the voiceless velar fricative with the nearest available continuant , or deleted it altogether ( 'book' pronounced or ).

Prosodically, children prefer bisyllabic words with the pattern strong – weak over monosyllabic words.

In the stop series (, , and , , ) young children tend to have anatomical problems producing the stops further into the vocal tract ( and ) and thus realize them homophonous to the bilabial or alveolar stops (, or , ), even though they are capable of detecting their phonemic distinctiveness.

Vowel space development

In 2009, Lintfert examined the development of vowel space of German speakers in their first three years of life. During the babbling stage, vowel distribution has no clear pattern. However, stressed and unstressed vowels already show different distributions in the vowel space. Once word production begins, stressed vowels expand in the vowel space, while the F₁ – F₂ vowel space of unstressed vowels becomes more centralized. The majority of infants are then capable of stable production of F₁. The variability of formant frequencies among individuals decreases with age. After 24 months, infants expand their vowel space individually at different rates. However, if the parents' utterances possess a well-defined vowel space, their children produce clearly distinguished vowel classes earlier. By about three years old, children command the production of all vowels, and they attempt to produce the four cardinal vowels, , , and , at the extreme limits of the F1–F2 vowel space (i.e., the height and backness of the vowels are made extreme by the infants).

Nasals

The acquisition of nasals in German differs from that of Dutch, a phonologically closely related language. German children produce proportionately more nasals in onset position (sounds before a vowel in a syllable) than Dutch children do. German children, once they reached 16 months, also produced significantly more nasals in syllables containing schwas, when compared with Dutch-speaking children. This may reflect differences in the languages the children are being exposed to, although the researchers claim that the development of nasals likely cannot be seen apart from the more general phonological system the child is developing.

Phonotactic constraints and reading

A 2006 study examined the acquisition of German in phonologically delayed children (specifically, issues with fronting of velars and stopping of fricatives) and whether they applied phonotactic constraints to word-initial consonant clusters containing these modified consonants. In many cases, the subjects (mean age = 5.1) avoided making phonotactic violations, opting instead for other consonants or clusters in their speech. This suggests that phonotactic constraints do apply to the speech of German children with phonological delay, at least in the case of word-initial consonant clusters. Additional research has also shown that spelling consistencies seen in German raise children's phonemic awareness as they acquire reading skills.

Sound changes

Sound changes and mergers

A common merger is that of at the end of a syllable with or , for instance ('war'), but ('wars'); ('he lay'), but ('we lay'). This pronunciation is frequent all over central and northern Germany. It is characteristic of regional languages and dialects, particularly Low German in the North, where Template:Angbr represents a fricative, becoming voiceless in the syllable coda, as is common in German (final-obstruent devoicing). However common it is, this pronunciation is considered sub-standard. Only in one case, in the grammatical ending (which corresponds to English -y), the fricative pronunciation of final Template:Angbr is prescribed by the Siebs standard, for instance ('important'), ('importance'). The merger occurs neither in Austro-Bavarian and Alemannic German nor in the corresponding varieties of Standard German, and therefore in these regions is pronounced . Hypercorrection of the suffix to be pronounced or even is common even in regions where Template:Angbr is frequently pronounced or .

Many speakers do not distinguish the affricate from the simple fricative in the beginning of a word, in which case the verb ('[he] travels') and the noun ('horse') are both pronounced . This most commonly occurs in northern and western Germany, where the local dialects did not originally have the sound . Some speakers also have peculiar pronunciation for in the middle or end of a word, replacing the in with a voiceless bilabial fricative, i.e. a consonant produced by pressing air flow through the tensed lips. Thereby ('drop') becomes , rather than .

Many speakers who have a vocalization of after merge this combination with long (i.e. > or > or ). Hereby, ('sheep') and ('sharp') can both be pronounced or . This merger does not occur where is a front vowel while is realised as a back vowel. Here the words are kept distinct as ('sheep') and ('sharp').

In umlaut forms, the difference usually reoccurs: or vs. . Speakers with this merger also often use (instead of formally normal ) where it stems from original . The word ('arks') is thus pronounced , which makes a minimal pair with , arguably making the difference between and phonemic, rather than just allophonic, for these speakers.

In the standard pronunciation, the vowel qualities , , , , as well as , , , , are all still distinguished even in unstressed syllables. In this latter case, however, many simplify the system in various degrees. For some speakers, this may go so far as to merge all four into one, hence misspellings by schoolchildren such as (instead of ) or (instead of Portugal).

In everyday speech, more mergers occur, some of which are universal and some of which are typical for certain regions or dialect backgrounds. Overall, there is a strong tendency of reduction and contraction. For example, long vowels may be shortened, consonant clusters may be simplified, word-final may be dropped in some cases, and the suffix may be contracted with preceding consonants, e.g. for ('to have').

If the clusters , , , or are followed by another consonant, the stops , and usually lose their phonemic status. Thus while the standard pronunciation distinguishes ('whole') from ('goose'), as well as from , the two pairs are homophones for most speakers. The commonest practice is to drop the stop (thus , for both words), but some speakers insert the stop where it is not etymological (, for both words), or they alternate between the two ways. Only a few speakers retain a phonemic distinction.

Middle High German

The Middle High German vowels and developed into the modern Standard German diphthong , whereas and developed into . For example, Middle High German and ('hot' and 'white') became Standard German and . In some dialects, the Middle High German vowels have not changed, e.g. Swiss German and , while in other dialects or languages, the vowels have changed but the distinction is kept, e.g. Bavarian and , Ripuarian and (however the Colognian dialect has kept the original [ei] diphthong in ), Yiddish and .

The Middle High German diphthongs , and became the modern Standard German long vowels , and after the Middle High German long vowels changed to diphthongs. Most Upper German dialects retain the diphthongs. A remnant of their former diphthong character is shown when continues to be written in German (as in 'love').

Loanwords

German incorporates a significant number of loanwords from other languages. Loanwords are often adapted to German phonology but to varying degrees, depending on the speaker and the commonness of the word. and do not occur in native German words but are common in a number of French and English loan words. Many speakers replace them with and respectively (especially in Southern Germany, Austria and Switzerland), so that (from English jungle) can be pronounced or . Some speakers in Northern and Western Germany merge with , so that (phonemically ) can be pronounced , or . The realization of as , however, is uncommon.

Loanwords from English

Many English words are used in German, especially in technology and pop culture. Some speakers pronounce them similarly to their native pronunciation, but many speakers change non-native phonemes to similar German phonemes (even if they pronounce them in a rather English manner in an English-language setting):

• English are usually pronounced as in RP or General American; some speakers replace them with and respectively (th-alveolarization) e.g. .
• English can be pronounced the same as in English, i.e. Template:IPAblink, or as the corresponding native German e.g. or . German and Austrian speakers tend to be variably rhotic when using English loanwords.
• English is often replaced with German e.g. .
• word-initial is often retained (especially in the South, where word-initial is common), but many speakers replace it with e.g. .
• word-initial and are usually retained, but some speakers (especially in South Western Germany and Western Austria) replace them with and e.g. or , or .
• English is usually retained, but in Northern and Western Germany as well as Luxembourg, it is often replaced with e.g. .
• In Northern Standard German, final-obstruent devoicing is applied to English loan words just as to other words e.g. , or , . However, in Southern Standard German, in Swiss Standard German and Austrian Standard German, final-obstruent devoicing does not occur and so speakers are more likely to retain the original pronunciation of word-final lenes (although realizing them as fortes may occur because of confusing English spelling with pronunciation).
• English and are often replaced with and respectively e.g. .
• English and are pronounced the same, as German (met–mat merger) e.g. .
• English and are pronounced the same, as German (cot–caught merger) e.g. .
• English is usually pronounced as German e.g. .
• English is usually pronounced as German e.g. or .
• English is pronounced as (happy-tensing) e.g. .

Loanwords from French

French loanwords, once very numerous, have in part been replaced by native German coinages or more recently English loanwords. Besides Template:IPAslink, they can also contain the characteristic nasal vowels Template:IPAblink, Template:IPAblink, Template:IPAblink and Template:IPAblink (always long). However, their status as phonemes is questionable and they are often resolved into sequences either of (short) oral vowel and Template:IPAblink (in the north), or of (long or short) oral vowel and Template:IPAblink or sometimes Template:IPAblink (in the south). For example, ('balloon') may be realized as or , ('perfume') as or and ('orange') as or .

Sample

The sample text is a reading of "The North Wind and the Sun". The phonemic transcription treats every instance of and as and , respectively. The phonetic transcription is a fairly narrow transcription of the educated northern accent. The speaker transcribed in the narrow transcription is 62 years old, and he is reading in a colloquial style. Aspiration, glottal stops and devoicing of the lenes after fortes are not transcribed.

The audio file contains the whole fable and was recorded by a much younger speaker.

See also

• German orthography

References

• Template:SOWL

External links

• Listen to the pronunciation of German first names