Congressional Progressive Caucus
Template:Short description Template:Protection padlock Template:Use mdy dates
Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) is a congressional caucus affiliated with the Democratic Party in the United States Congress.[1] The CPC represents the progressive faction of the Democratic Party.[2][3] It was founded in 1991 and has grown since then, becoming the second-largest Democratic caucus in the House of Representatives.
As of July 19, 2024, the CPC has 98 members (95 voting representatives, one non-voting delegate, and one senator),[4][5][6][7] making it the second-largest ideological caucus in the House Democratic Caucus by voting members, behind the New Democrat Coalition. The CPC is chaired by U.S. representative Greg Casar (D-TX). In addition, the CPC is affiliated with the Congressional Political Caucus PAC, a political action committee which is led by members of the caucus.
History
The CPC was established in 1991 by U.S. representatives Ron Dellums (D-CA), Lane Evans (D-IL), Thomas Andrews (D-ME), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Maxine Waters (D-CA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT). Additional representatives joined soon thereafter, including Major Owens (D-NY), Nydia Velázquez (D-NY), David Bonior (D-MI), Bob Filner (D-CA), Barney Frank (D-MA), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Jim McDermott (D-WA), Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Patsy Mink (D-HI), George Miller (D-CA), Pete Stark (D-CA), John Olver (D-MA), Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), and Lynn Woolsey (D-CA). Sanders was the first CPC chairman.[8]
The founding CPC members were concerned about the economic hardship imposed by the deepening recession and the growing inequality brought about by the timidity of the Democratic Party response in the early 1990s. On January 3, 1995, at a standing room only news conference on Capitol Hill, they were the first group inside Congress to chart a comprehensive legislative alternative to U.S. speaker Newt Gingrich and the Republican Contract with America. The CPC's agenda was framed as "The Progressive Promise: Fairness".[9]
List of chairs
| Term start | Term end | Chair(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 1999 | Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
| |
| 1999 | 2003 | Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH)
| |
| 2003 | 2005 | Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-OR)
| |
| 2005 | 2009 | Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) | Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA) |
| 2009 | 2011 | Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) | |
| 2011 | 2017 | Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) | |
| 2017 | 2019 | Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) | |
| 2019 | 2021 | Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) | |
| 2021 | 2025 | Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA)
| |
| 2025 | present | Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX)
| |
Leadership
Chair: Greg Casar (TX-35)
Deputy Chair: Ilhan Omar (MN-5)
_A.jpg){kind=link}
Whip: Chuy García (IL-4)
Chair Emeriti: Pramila Jayapal (WA-7) and Mark Pocan (WI-2)
Vice Chairs:
- Lloyd Doggett (TX-37)
- Maxwell Frost (FL-10)
- Jared Huffman (CA-2)
- Ro Khanna (CA-17)
- Morgan McGarvey (KY-3)
- Delia Ramirez (IL-3)
- Jan Schakowsky (IL-9)
- Lateefah Simon (CA-12)
- Mark Takano (CA-39)
- Rashida Tlaib (MI-12)
Executive Board Members at Large:
- Chris Deluzio (PA-17)
- Veronica Escobar (TX-16)
- Summer Lee (PA-12)
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14)
- Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12)
Policy positions
The CPC advocates "a universal, high-quality, Medicare for All health care system for all", living wage laws, reductions in military expenditure, increased corporate regulation and taxes, ending mass incarceration, strong measures to reverse climate change, immigration reform and reparations.[10]
Economy
In April 2011, the CPC released a proposed "People's Budget" for fiscal year 2012.[11] Two of its proponents stated: "By implementing a fair tax code, by building a resilient American economy, and by bringing our troops home, we achieve a budget surplus of over $30 billion by 2021 and we end up with a debt that is less than 65% of our GDP. This is what sustainability looks like".[12]
In 2019, the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives passed H.R.582, The Raise the Wage Act,[13] which would have gradually raised the minimum wage to $15 per hour. It was not taken up in the Republican-controlled Senate. In January 2021, Democrats in the Senate and House of Representatives reintroduced the bill.[14] In February 2021, the Congressional Budget Office released a report on the Raise the Wage Act of 2021 which estimated that incrementally raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025 would benefit 17 million workers, but would also reduce employment by 1.4 million people.[15][16][17] On February 27, 2021, the Democratic-controlled House passed the American Rescue Plan pandemic relief package, which included a gradual minimum wage increase to $15 per hour.[18] The measure was ultimately removed from the Senate version of the bill.[19]
2024 elections
Five weeks after the 2024 elections, Caucus chair-elect Greg Casar connected "serious discontent" with the Democratic Party to the "2008 housing crash", as manifested in Occupy Wall Street and certain aims for movements such as Black Lives Matter. According to Casar, Democratic Party leaders must redirect voter attentions away from the specter of "an asylum seeker trying to raise your rent" to "hedge funds just buying up neighborhoods, jacking up the rent and being deregulated by the Republicans."[20] In a subsequent interview, the Texas labor advocate admitted that "the Democratic brand has been damaged" and outlined the Progressive Caucus strategy for a "rebrand".[21]
Casar observed that, during the 2024 electoral campaigns, Republicans focused on "targeting and scapegoating a group of vulnerable people in order to make it sound like, in Middle America, that is all the Democratic Party works on and cares about." Casar pointed out that Nancy Mace, for instance, had already announced plans to regulate "which marble bathroom certain people can and can’t use, because she wants to distract the American people from the billionaire tax cut that she’s about to work on with Donald Trump." But he added that Democrats should not support "fighting for working people first" as an avenue for "throwing [another group of] vulnerable people under the bus."[20]
In narrating authenticity, "what works is if we tell a clear and authentic story to the American people about why they feel screwed over." In response to such stories promulgated across the aisle, "We should point out that it wasn’t a trans person that denied your health insurance claim; it was a gigantic corporation that went unregulated by the Republicans. It’s not an undocumented immigrant raising your rent; it’s a Wall Street hedge fund that’s doing it, and Trump is appointing those guys to his Cabinet. I think the Progressive Caucus is ready to tell that kind of story."[22]
Health care
The Medicare for All Act is a bill first introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Representative John Conyers (D-MI) in 2003, with 38 co-sponsors.[23][24] In 2019, the original 16-year-old proposal was renumbered, and Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) introduced a broadly similar but more detailed bill,[25] HR 1384, in the 116th Congress.[26] Template:As of, it had 116 co-sponsors still in the House at the time, or 49.8% of House Democrats.[27]
The act would establish a universal single-payer health care system in the United States, the rough equivalent of Canada's Medicare and Taiwan's Bureau of National Health Insurance, among other examples. Under a single-payer system, most medical care would be paid for by the federal government, ending the need for private health insurance and premiums, and re-casting private insurance companies as providing purely supplemental coverage, to be used when non-essential care is sought. The national system would be paid for in part through taxes replacing insurance premiums, but also by savings realized through the provision of preventive universal health care and the elimination of insurance company overhead and hospital billing costs.[28] On September 13, 2017, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) introduced a parallel bill in the United States Senate, with 16 co-sponsors.[29][30][31] The act would establish a universal single-payer health care system in the United States.[28]
In 2019, the CPC challenged House speaker Nancy Pelosi regarding the details of a drug-pricing bill, the Elijah Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act.[32] The final version was the result of extensive negotiations between House Democratic leadership and members of the CPC.[33] The bill was introduced into the House of Representatives on September 19, 2019, during the 116th Congress by Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ).[24] The bill received 106 co-sponsors.[34] It passed the House on December 12, 2019, by a vote of (230-192). All Democrats voted for the measure, and all but 2 Republicans voted against it. The bill was then sent to the Senate. The Senate, having been controlled by Republicans, did not bring the bill up for a vote.
Abortion rights
During the 117th United States Congress, Congresswoman Judy Chu (CA-27) introduced the Women's Health Protection Act. The act would expand abortion rights and codify Roe v. Wade. It was introduced in response to the Texas Heartbeat Act. It passed House of Representatives (218–211), but was defeated in the Senate on a 46–48 vote in February 2022.[35][36]
Climate change
A prominent 2019 attempt to get legislation passed for a Green New Deal was sponsored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) during the 116th United States Congress, though it failed to advance in the Senate.[37] Green New Deal proposals call for public policy to address climate change along with achieving other social aims like job creation and reducing economic inequality. The name refers back to the New Deal, a set of social and economic reforms and public works projects undertaken by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression.[38] The Green New Deal combines Roosevelt's economic approach with modern ideas such as renewable energy and resource efficiency.[39][40]
LGBT rights
In July 2022, the House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Congressional LGBTQ+ Equality caucus chairman David Cicilline (D-RI), Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) announced the re-introduction of the Respect for Marriage Act, which was revised to include protections for interracial marriages to codify Loving v. Virginia.[41] The act passed the House (267–157) on July 19, 2022, with 47 Republicans joining all Democrats in voting in the affirmative.[42]
The Senate considered the bill, but it was initially unclear if it would receive enough votes to end debate. On November 14, 2022, a group of bipartisan senators, including Rob Portman (R-OH), Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), and Susan Collins (R-ME) announced they had reached an amendment compromise to include language for religious protections and clarify that the bill did not legalize polygamous marriage.[43] The amendment specifies that nonprofit religious organizations will not be required to provide services for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage.[44] Shortly after, Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer announced the Respect for Marriage Act would be put up for a full vote.[45]
On November 16, 2022, the Senate invoked cloture on the motion to proceed (62–37) to the amended bill.[46] All 50 Democratic senators and 12 Republicans (Roy Blunt, Richard Burr, Shelley Moore Capito, Susan Collins, Joni Ernst, Cynthia Lummis, Lisa Murkowski, Rob Portman, Mitt Romney, Dan Sullivan, Thom Tillis, and Todd Young) voted in favor of advancing the bill.[44] On November 29, 2022, the Senate voted 61–36 to pass the bill.[47] Voting in favor of the bill were 49 Democrats and the same 12 Republicans who had voted to advance it. Two Republicans (Ben Sasse and Patrick Toomey) and one Democrat (Raphael Warnock, who co-sponsored the bill) did not vote.[48]
Foreign policy
Israel
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Representative Lois Frankel (FL-22) left the caucus on November 20, 2023, and Ritchie Torres (NY-15) left the caucus on February 21, 2024; both left over disagreements regarding support for Israel in the Gaza war. Both are described as staunch supporters of Israel.[49][50] Twenty Democrats led by Summer Lee and Greg Casar, who was elected to lead the Congressional Caucus in 2025, are calling for support for U.S. legislation that would ban arming countries that block humanitarian aid.[51]
2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
In October 2022, 30 members of the caucus urged the Biden administration to seek a negotiated, diplomatic end to the Russian invasion of Ukraine while advocating for continued economic and military support to Ukraine.[52][53] The next day, after a wave of criticism, the letter was swiftly withdrawn on the basis that peaceful negotiations with Putin in current situation are "nearly impossible". Jayapal reasserted the Democrats' support for Ukraine and said the letter had been drafted several months ago and "released by staff without vetting".[54]
Electoral results
| Election year | Senate | House of Representatives | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic Caucus | ± | % | Democratic Caucus | ± | % | |
| 2010 | Template:Composition bar | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | ||
| 2012 | Template:Composition bar | Template:Loss 1 | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Template:Loss 9 | Script error: No such module "Percentage". |
| 2014 | Template:Composition bar | Steady | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Steady | Script error: No such module "Percentage". |
| 2016 | Template:Composition bar | Steady | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Increase 10 | Script error: No such module "Percentage". |
| 2018 | Template:Composition bar | Steady | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Increase 18 | Script error: No such module "Percentage". |
| 2020 | Template:Composition bar | Steady | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Template:Loss 1 | Script error: No such module "Percentage". |
| 2022 | Template:Composition bar | Steady | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Increase 5 | Script error: No such module "Percentage". |
| 2024 | Template:Composition bar | Steady | Script error: No such module "Percentage". | Template:Composition bar | Template:Loss 4 | Script error: No such module "Percentage". |
Membership
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
All members are Democrats or caucus with the Democratic Party. In the 119th Congress, there are currently 96 declared progressives, including 94 voting representatives, 1 non-voting delegate, and 1 senator.[4]
Senate members
| State | Party | CPVI[55] | Member |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermont | Template:Party shading/Independent |Independent | style="color:black;background-color:Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/shading" |D+17 | Template:Sortname |
House members
Affiliate organizations
The CPC is affiliated with the Congressional Political Caucus PAC, a political action committee which was established in 2009 and is led by members of the caucus to endorse and fundraise for candidates.[56] In 2018, the caucus established the Congressional Progressive Caucus Center and Progressive Caucus Action Fund, a 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4), respectively, to coordinate messaging and policy initiatives between the caucus and supportive organizations.[57][58]
See also
- Blue Dog Coalition
- Democratic Socialists of America
- Factions in the Democratic Party (United States)
- New Democrat Coalition
- Progressive Democrats of America
- Republican Main Street Partnership
- Republican Governance Group
- Problem Solvers Caucus
- The Squad (United States Congress)
- Progressivism in the United States
Notes
References
External links
Template:Ideological caucuses in the U.S. Congress Script error: No such module "navbox". Template:Authority control
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". "[T]he Congressional Progressive Caucus, the umbrella group for left-leaning Democratic members of Congress".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Summary: H.R.582 — 116th Congress (2019-2020) congress.gov
- ↑ "Democrats introduce bill to hike federal minimum wage to $15 per hour", CNBC, January 16, 2019.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ "American Rescue Plan: What's in the House's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief plan", Washington Post, February 27, 2021.
- ↑ "Senate passes $1.9 trillion Biden relief bill after voting overnight on amendments, sends measure back to House", Washington Post, March 6, 2021.
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite magazine
- ↑ Template:Ordinal-congress/HR/Template:Replace HR Template:Replace
- ↑ a b "House Reps Introduce Medicare-for-All Bill" Becker's Hospital Review, Feb. 14, 2013
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Template:Cite tweet
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Jeremy Lovell (July 21, 2008) "Climate report calls for green 'New Deal'" Template:Webarchive, Reuters.
- ↑ A Green New Deal: Discursive Review and Appraisal. Template:Webarchive Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models eJournal. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Accessed March 14, 2019.
- ↑ Hilary French, Michael Renner and Gary Gardner: Toward a Transatlantic Green New Deal Template:Webarchive The authors state: "Support is growing around the world for an integrated response to the current economic and environmental crises, increasingly referred to as the "Green New Deal". The term is a modern-day variation of the U.S. New Deal, an ambitious effort launched by President Franklin Roosevelt to lift the United States out of the Great Depression. The New Deal of that era entailed a strong government role in economic planning and a series of stimulus packages launched between 1933 and 1938 that created jobs through ambitious governmental programs, including the construction of roads, trails, dams, and schools. Today's Green New Deal proposals are also premised on the importance of decisive governmental action, but incorporate policies to respond to pressing environmental challenges through a new paradigm of sustainable economic progress."
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Wang, Amy B; Abutaleb, Yasmeen; and Sotomayor, Marianna (October 25, 2022) "Liberal Democrats withdraw letter to Biden that urged him to rethink Ukraine strategy" The Washington Post
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Pages with script errors
- Pages with broken file links
- Ideological caucuses of the United States Congress
- Democratic Party (United States) organizations
- Progressivism in the United States
- Progressive organizations in the United States
- Organizations established in 1991
- Left-wing populism in the United States
- Social democratic organizations
- 1991 establishments in Washington, D.C.
- Factions in the Democratic Party (United States)