McCune–Reischauer

File:Suwon (McCune-Reischauer Romanisation) (cropped).JPG

In this 2014 photo of a road sign in Suwon, is romanized , using McCune–Reischauer. It would be in Revised Romanization.

McCune–Reischauer (MR; Template:IPAc-en ) is a romanization system for the Korean language. It was first published in 1939 by George M. McCune and Edwin O. Reischauer. Significant work on the system was done by Korean linguists Choe Hyeon-bae, Template:Ill, and Template:Ill.

According to Reischauer, McCune "persuaded the American Army Map Service to adopt [the McCune–Reischauer system], and through the Korean War it became the foundation for most current Romanizations of Korean place names."

A variant of McCune–Reischauer is currently used as the official system in North Korea. Another variant is currently used for standard romanization library catalogs in North America. On the other hand, South Korea formerly used yet another variant as its official system from 1984 to 2000, but replaced it with the Revised Romanization of Korean in 2000.

Characteristics

The following are some characteristics of the McCune–Reischauer system:

• With a few exceptions, it does not attempt to transliterate Korean hangul but rather represents the phonetic pronunciation.
  • Example: (pronounced []) (not *tokrip)
• The voiceless and voiced allophones of the Korean phonemes //, //, //, and // are transcribed differently.
  • Examples: , , ,
• The apostrophe is used for transcribing strongly aspirated consonants , , , and (, , and respectively), and for distinguishing () from ().
  • Examples: ; (cf. )
• The breve is used for the vowels () and (), and diphthongs containing those sounds ( , ; ).

Use of diacritics and their omission

McCune–Reischauer employs dual use of apostrophes, with the more common being for syllabic boundaries. Therefore, it may take some time for learners to familiarise themselves with the placement of apostrophes to determine how a romanized Korean word is pronounced. For example, → , which consists of the syllables , , , and .

In the early days of the Internet, the apostrophe and breve were even omitted altogether for both technical and practical reasons, which made it impossible to differentiate the strongly aspirated consonants , , and from the unaspirated consonants , , and , and the vowels and from and .

For example, if the diacritics in the MR rendering of the name of South Korean city Ch'ŏngju (Template:Korean/auto) are omitted (Chongju), it overlaps with the name of North Korean city Chongju (Template:Korean/auto). There is a claim of uncertain veracityTemplate:Efn that, during the 1950–1953 Korean War, the US Army accidentally (or almost) bombed the wrong city due to this.

As a result, the South Korean government introduced a revised system of romanization in 2000. However, Korean critics claimed that the Revised System fails to represent and in a way that is easily recognizable and misrepresents the way that the unaspirated consonants are actually pronounced.

Guide

This is a simplified guide for the McCune–Reischauer system.

Vowels

Hangul						Template:Efn
Romanization	a	ae	ya	yae	ŏ	e	yŏ	ye	o	wa	wae	oe	yo	u	wŏ	we	wi	yu	ŭ	ŭi	i

Consonants

Word-initially and word-finally

Hangul											Template:Efn	Template:Efn	Template:Efn
Romanization	Word-initial	k	kk	n	t	tt	r	m	p	pp	s	ss	—	ch	tch	ch'	k'	t'	p'	h
	Word-final		k			—	l			—	t	—	ng	t	—	t	k	t	p	t

The heterogeneous consonant digraphs (, , , , , , , , , , and ) exist only as syllabic finals and are transcribed by their actual pronunciation.

Word-medially

The following table is sufficient for the transcription of most proper names.

Final consonant of the previous syllable + initial consonant of the next syllable

		InitialTemplate:Efn
		Template:Efn —	k	kk	n	t	tt	r	m	p	pp	Template:Efn s	ss	ch	tch	h
Final	(vowel)Template:Efn	—	g	kk	n	d	tt	r	m	b	pp	s	ss	j	tch	h
	k	g	kk	kk	ngn	kt	ktt	ngn	ngm	kp	kpp	ks	kss	kch	ktch	kh
	n	n	n'g	nkk	nn	nd	ntt	ll	nm	nb	npp	ns	nss	nj	ntch	nh
	t	d	tk	tkk	nn	tt	tt	nn	nm	tp	tpp	ss	ss	tch	tch	th
	l	r	lg	lkk	ll	ldTemplate:Efn	ltt	ll	lm	lb	lpp	ls	lss	ljTemplate:Efn	ltch	rh
	m	m	mg	mkk	mn	md	mtt	mn	mm	mb	mpp	ms	mss	mj	mtch	mh
	p	b	pk	pkk	mn	pt	ptt	mn	mm	pp	pp	ps	pss	pch	ptch	ph
	ng	ng	ngg	ngkk	ngn	ngd	ngtt	ngn	ngm	ngb	ngpp	ngs	ngss	ngj	ngtch	ngh

The following subsections are for cases not covered by the table above, or for cases where the result should be different from the table.

Any non- syllabic final + syllabic initial

In this combination, the syllabic final (except , which is always ) is

1. either directly transferred to the syllabic initial position of the next syllable (i.e. replacing the ),
   • Examples: [] , [] , [] , [] , [] , []
   1. When the syllabic final or (including ) is followed by , palatalization occurs.
      • Examples: [] , [] , []
   2. Syllabic final digraphs are split.
      • Examples: [] , []
2. or neutralized to one of {ㄱ, ㄴ, ㄷ, ㄹ, ㅁ, ㅂ} first, and then transferred to the syllabic initial position of the next syllable.
   • Examples: [→] , [→]

Any non- syllabic final + syllabic initial {ㄱ, ㄷ, ㅂ, ㅈ}

If the syllabic initial is pronounced

• {[], [], [], []}, they are romanized {g, d, b, j}. When is preceded by , an apostrophe is added between them (i.e. ).
• {[], [], [], []}, they are romanized {k, t, p, ch} (not {kk, tt, pp, tch}).

Examples:

• [] vs. []
• [] vs. []
• [] vs. []
• [] vs. () []

Any syllabic final + syllabic initial

Any combination with the syllabic initial is transcribed based on the actual pronunciation, except when the result is [], [], or []; these are treated as (), (), and () respectively.

• Examples: [] , [] , []
• Examples of exceptions:
  • ([], but treated as [])
  • ([], treated as [])
  • ([], treated as [])

Syllabic final + any syllabic initial

Any combination with the syllabic final (including and ) is transcribed based on the actual pronunciation.

• Examples: [] , [] , []

Personal names

The rules stated above are also applied in personal names, except between a surname and a given name. A surname and a given name are separated by a space, but multiple syllables within a surname or within a given name are joined without hyphens or spaces.

The original 1939 paper states the following:Template:Sfn

The Romanization of Proper Names and Titles

Proper names like words should not be divided into syllables, as has often been done in the past. For example, the geographic term should be romanized Kwangju. Irregularities occurring in proper names such as in P'yŏngyang which is colloquially pronounced P'iyang or P'eyang, should usually be ignored in romanizations intended for scholarly use.

Personal names demand special consideration. As in China, the great majority of surnames are monosyllables representing a single character, while a few are two character names. The given name, which follows the surname, usually has two characters but sometimes only one. In both two character surnames and two character given names the general rules of euphonic change should be observed, and the two syllables should be written together.

The problem of the euphonic changes between a surname and given name or title is very difficult. A man known as Paek Paksa (Dr. Paek) might prove to have the full name of Paeng Nakchun because of the assimilation of the final k of his surname and the initial n of his given name. The use in romanization of both Dr. Paek and Paeng Nakchun for the same person would result in considerable confusion. Therefore it seems best for romanizations purposes to disregard euphonic changes between surnames and given names or titles, so that the above name should be romanized Paek Nakchun.

For ordinary social use our romanization often may not prove suitable for personal names. Even in scholarly work there are also a few instances of rather well-established romanizations for proper names which might be left unchanged, just as the names of some of the provinces of China still have traditional romanizations not in accord with the Wade–Giles system. There is, for example, Seoul, which some may prefer to the Sŏul of our system. Another very important example is , the surname of the kings of the last Korean dynasty and still a very common Korean surname. Actually it is pronounced in the standard dialect and should be romanized Template:Serif, but some may prefer to retain the older romanization, Yi, because that is already the familiar form. In any case the other romanizations of , Ri and Li, should not be used.

The original paper also gives McCune–Reischauer romanizations for a number of other personal names:

• (), (), ()Template:Sfn
• (; )Template:Sfn
• (; ), (; )Template:Sfn

History

George M. McCune, son of Pyongyang-based missionary George Shannon McCune, was born in Korea in 1905.Template:Sfn After attending university in the United States,Template:Sfn he returned to Korea (which was then under Japanese rule) in the summer of 1937 to work on his PhD dissertation for the University of California, Berkeley. In Korea, he studied at Chōsen Christian College (predecessor to Yonsei University) in Seoul (then called "Keijō") under the Korean linguists Choe Hyeon-bae, Template:Ill, and Template:Ill.Template:Sfn Around September of that year, Japanologist Edwin O. Reischauer became stranded in Keijō while he was en route to Beijing due to the Second Sino-Japanese War.Template:Sfn During Reischauer's two-month stay there, he and McCune worked with Choe, Jeong, and Kim to develop what would become the McCune–Reischauer romanization system.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Work continued on the system even after Reischauer departed Korea to China. Eventually, the system was published in 1939 in the journal Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society Korea Branch.

In 1980, Reischauer wrote in a letter that the system was devised at his suggestion because he "found absolutely no uniform system of any sort, and [he] needed something for the Korean names that appeared in [his] studies on the travels of the [Japanese] monk Ennin". He also wrote that they designed the system "with only scholars in mind", and that he felt it was too complicated for regular use. He expressed hope that a new romanization that "everyone would use for both scholarly and popular use [would] be worked out and adopted".

The new South Korean government adopted the system in 1948.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn English-language newspaper The Korea Times adopted the system in the 1950s. The system received pushback from Koreans. It came to be seen as more intuitive for foreigners and less intuitive for Koreans, as it reflected pronunciation changes that most Koreans were not consciously aware of.Template:Sfn Fouser argued that another point of contention was related to nationalism; some disliked that the system had been developed by foreigners during the Japanese colonial period, and wanted a natively developed alternative.Template:Sfn In 1959, the Template:Ill published a romanization system, which has since been dubbed the Ministry of Education system (MOE).Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The system was immediately controversial, especially among foreigners. Fouser evaluated the system as prioritizing use for Koreans; it had a one-to-one correspondence from Hangul to Latin script and did not reflect pronunciation changes that Hangul did not.Template:Sfn In June 1981, a number of scholars met at the University of Hawaii's Center for Korean Studies and developed a number of proposed changes to MR. The changes were largely based on a draft proposal from the US Library of Congress and were meant to aid use by librarians. For example, it was designed to promote reversibility, which was to the interest of librarians. In the 1980s, the South Korean government began considering whether to use a more foreigner-friendly system in anticipation of the 1986 Asian Games and the 1988 Summer Olympics, which were to be held in Seoul. In 1984, a slightly modified version of McCune–Reischauer was adopted.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Some South Koreans reportedly had negative reactions to the system, which they viewed as confusing and overly beholden to pronunciation.Template:Sfn

With the spread of computers and the Internet in the 1990s, complaints and debate about MR grew. This was primarily related to the system's use of diacritics, which are difficult to access on standard keyboards. In 1997, the South Korean government began moving to revise or switch romanization systems.Template:Sfn

In contemporary South Korea, which has since adopted Revised Romanization, MR has left a lasting legacy in a number of cases:

• "TK" standing for Daegu and Gyeongbuk (from the MR spellings "Taegu" and "Kyŏngbuk")
  • First used on December 23, 1987
• "PK" standing for Busan and Gyeongnam (from the MR spellings "Pusan" and "Kyŏngnam")

Variants

North Korean variant

A variant of McCune–Reischauer is currently in official use in North Korea. The following are the differences between the original McCune–Reischauer and the North Korean variant:

• Aspirated consonants are represented by adding an h instead of an apostrophe.
  • However, is transcribed as ch, not chh.
• is transcribed as j even when it is voiceless.
• is transcribed as jj instead of tch.
• is transcribed as lr instead of ll.
• is transcribed as lh instead of rh.
• When is pronounced as , it is still transcribed as r instead of n.
• and are differentiated by a hyphen.
  • But when ng is followed by y or w, a hyphen is not used, like the original system.
• In personal names, each syllable in a Sino-Korean given name is separated by a space with the first letter of each syllable capitalized (e.g. An Pok Chŏl). Syllables in a native Korean name are joined without syllabic division (e.g. Kim KKotpuni).
  • However, it is not really possible to follow this rule. See the Template:Section link section below.

The following table illustrates the differences above.

Hangul	McCune–Reischauer	North Korean variant	Meaning
		phyŏnji	letter (message)
		Juche	Juche
		anjjok	inside
		ppalri	quickly
		Palhae	Balhae
		mongran	Magnolia sieboldii
		yŏn-gu	research, study
		yŏng-ŏ	English language
		An Pok Chŏl	personal name (surname , given name )

South Korean variant

A variant of McCune–Reischauer was in official use in South Korea from 1984 to 2000. The following are the differences between the original McCune–Reischauer and the South Korean variant:

• was written as shi instead of the original system's . When is followed by , it is realized as (similar to English (sh as in show)) instead of . The original system uses sh only in , as .
• was written as wo instead of the original system's . Because the diphthong w ( or as a semivowel) + o () does not exist in Korean phonology, the South Korean government omitted the breve in .
• Hyphens were used to distinguish between and , between and , and between and in this variant system, instead of the apostrophes and ë in the original version. Therefore, apostrophes were used only for aspiration marks and ë was not used in the South Korean system.
• was written as lh instead of .
• Assimilation-induced aspiration by a syllabic initial was indicated. is written as in the original system and as k' in the South Korean variant.
• In personal names, each syllable in a given name was separated by a hyphen. The consonants , , , and right after a hyphen were transcribed using the voiceless letter (k, t, p, and ch respectively) even when they are voiced (e.g. Namgung Tong-cha). But a hyphen can be omitted in non-Sino-Korean names (e.g. Han Hana).
  • However, it is not really possible to follow this rule. See the Template:Section link section below.

The following table illustrates the differences above.

Hangul	McCune–Reischauer	South Korean variant	Meaning
		shijang	market
		swipta	easy
		sowon	wish
		yŏn-gu	research, study
		yŏng-ŏ	English language
		hoesa-esŏ	at a company
		ch'ago-e	in a garage
		Palhae	Balhae
		nak'asan	parachute
		mot'ada	to be poor at
		kop'agi	multiplication
		Namgung Tong-cha	personal name (surname , given name )

ALA-LC variant

Among the various ALA-LC romanization systems is one for Korean. It is currently used for standard romanization library catalogs in North America. It is based on but deviates from McCune–Reischauer. The following are some differences between the original McCune–Reischauer and the ALA-LC variant:

• Unlike the original McCune–Reischauer, it addresses word division in 29 pages of detail.Template:Rp
  • A postposition (or particle) is separated from its preceding word,Template:Rp even though the original McCune–Reischauer paper explicitly states that this should not be done.
• // + // is written as ts instead of ss.Template:Rp
• The surname is written as Yi instead of Template:Serif.Template:Rp
• For given names:
  • A hyphen is inserted between the syllables of a two-syllable given name only when it is preceded by a surname, with the sound change between the syllables indicatedTemplate:Rp (e.g. Yi Sŏng-min). The original McCune–Reischauer paper explicitly states that this also should not be done.
  • If a given name is three syllables longTemplate:Rp or is of non-Sino-Korean origin, the syllables are joined without syllabic divisionTemplate:Rp (e.g. Sin Saimdang, Kim Satkat).
  • However, it is not really possible to follow this rule because a certain name written in hangul can be a native Korean name, or a Sino-Korean name, or even both. For example, can not only be a native Korean name, but can also be a Sino-Korean name (e.g. 寶濫). In some cases, parents intend a dual meaning: both the meaning from a native Korean word and the meaning from hanja. In fact, ALA-LC admitted that it is not really possible to determine whether a certain given name is Sino-Korean or not.

The following table illustrates the differences above.

Hangul	McCune–Reischauer	ALA-LC variant	Meaning
		kkot i	flower + (subject marker)
		kutseda	strong, firm
		Yi Sŏng-min	personal name (surname , given name )

The older (1997) version of the ALA-LC rule used Template:Serif for strongly aspirated consonants and Template:Serif for (e.g. machTemplate:SerifanTemplate:Serifgaji), even though the original McCune–Reischauer paper uses the Template:Serif shape for both. This distinction in the older ALA-LC rule was removed in the new ALA-LC rule above.

External links

• PDF files of the 1939 paper, and the 1961 paper
• A Practical Guide to McCune–Reischauer Romanization: Rules, guidelines, and font
• Comparison table of different romanization systems from UN Working Group on Romanization Systems (PDF file)
• Template:Webarchive
• Online tool for McCune–Reischauer romanization (with BGN modifications)