Eight Consciousnesses: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
Grammar.
 
→Tathagata-garbha thought: The name in the source is "Dan Lusthaus", not "Jan".
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Types of consciousness in Mahayana Buddhism}}
{{Short description|Types of consciousness in Mahayana Buddhism}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}}
{{Buddhism}}
{{Mahayana Buddhism}}
{{redirect|Alaya}}
{{redirect|Alaya}}


The '''Eight Consciousnesses''' (Skt. ''aṣṭa vijñānakāyāḥ''<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/1_sanskr/6_sastra/3_phil/buddh/hvsatssu.htm|title=Sātyasiddhiśāstra|last=Harivarman|postscript=At vargaḥ 62 (nācaitasikavargaḥ): "ya ādhyātmiko 'sti vijñānakāyāḥ"}}</ref>) are a classification developed in the tradition of the [[Yogacara|Yogācāra]] school of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhism]]. They enumerate the five sense consciousnesses, supplemented by the mental consciousness (''manovijñāna''), the '''defiled mental consciousness''' (''kliṣṭamanovijñāna''<ref name=":0" />), and finally the fundamental '''store-house consciousness''' (''ālāyavijñāna''),  which is the basis of the other seven.<ref name="auto">Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 97</ref> This eighth consciousness is said to store the impressions (''[[vasanas|vāsanāḥ]]'') of previous experiences, which form the seeds (''[[bīja]]'') of future [[karma]] in this life and in the next after [[Rebirth (Buddhism)|rebirth]].
The '''Eight Consciousnesses''' (Skt. ''aṣṭa vijñānakāyāḥ''<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://gretil.sub.uni-goettingen.de/gretil/1_sanskr/6_sastra/3_phil/buddh/hvsatssu.htm|title=Sātyasiddhiśāstra|last=Harivarman|postscript=At vargaḥ 62 (nācaitasikavargaḥ): "ya ādhyātmiko 'sti vijñānakāyāḥ"}}</ref>) are a classification developed in the tradition of the [[Yogacara|Yogācāra]] school of [[Mahayana]] [[Buddhism]]. They enumerate the five sense consciousnesses, supplemented by the mental consciousness (''manovijñāna''), the '''defiled mental consciousness''' (''kliṣṭamanovijñāna''<ref name=":0" />), and finally the fundamental '''store-house consciousness''' (''ālāyavijñāna''),  which is the basis of the other seven.<ref name="auto">Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 97</ref> This eighth consciousness is said to store the impressions (''[[vasanas|vāsanāḥ]]'') of previous experiences, which form the seeds (''[[bīja]]'') of future [[karma]] in this life and in the next after [[Rebirth (Buddhism)|rebirth]].


{{Contains special characters|Tibetan}}
{{Contains special characters|Tibetan}}


==Eightfold network of primary consciousnesses==
==Eightfold network of primary consciousnesses==
All surviving schools of Buddhist thought accept&nbsp;–&nbsp;"in common"&nbsp;–&nbsp;the existence of the first six primary consciousnesses (Sanskrit: ''{{IAST|[[vijñāna]]}}'', {{bo|t=རྣམ་ཤེས་|w=rnam-shes}}).<ref name="Berzin MMF Quote">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=Mind and Mental Factors: the Fifty-one Types of Subsidiary Awareness|url=http://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/science-of-mind/mind-mental-factors/primary-minds-and-the-51-mental-factors|publisher=Study Buddhism|access-date=4 June 2016|location=Berlin, Germany; June 2002; revised July, 2006|quote=Unlike the Western view of consciousness as a general faculty that can be aware of all sensory and mental objects, Buddhism differentiates six types of consciousness, each of which is specific to one sensory field or to the mental field.  A primary consciousness cognizes merely the essential nature (''ngo-bo'') of an object, which means the category of phenomenon to which something belongs.  For example, eye consciousness cognizes a sight as merely a sight.  The Chittamatra schools add two more types of primary consciousness to make their list of an eightfold network of primary consciousnesses (''rnam-shes tshogs-brgyad''): deluded awareness (''nyon-yid''), ''alayavijnana'' (''kun-gzhi rnam-shes'', all-encompassing foundation consciousness, storehouse consciousness).  ''Alayavijnana'' is an individual consciousness, not a universal one, underlying all moments of cognition.  It cognizes the same objects as the cognitions it underlies, but is a nondetermining cognition of what appears to it (''snang-la ma-nges-pa'', inattentive cognition) and lacks clarity of its objects.  It carries karmic legacies (''sa-bon'') and the mental impressions of memories, in the sense that both are nonstatic abstractions imputed on the ''alayavijnana''.  The continuity of an individual ''alayavijnana'' ceases with the attainment of enlightenment.}}</ref>  The internally coherent {{IAST|Yogācāra}} school associated with [[Maitreya]], [[Asaṅga]], and [[Vasubandhu]], however, uniquely&nbsp;–&nbsp;or "uncommonly"&nbsp;–&nbsp;also posits the existence of two additional primary consciousnesses, ''kliṣṭamanovijñāna'' and ''{{IAST|ālayavijñāna}}'', in order to explain the workings of ''[[karma]]''.<ref name="Sparham" />  The first six of these primary consciousnesses comprise the five sensory faculties together with mental consciousness, which is counted as the sixth.<ref name="Berzin Primary">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xprimary_20consciousness|work=Primary Consciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=14 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Within a cognition of an object, the awareness of merely the essential nature of the object that the cognition focuses on.  Primary consciousness has the identity-nature of being an individualizing awareness.}}</ref> The '' kliṣṭamanovijñāna '' is described as an afflicted consciousness, which exhibits an ongoing subtle clinging to self that provides the basis for the ego and [[Kleshas (Buddhism) |disturbing emotions]]. Based on the [[Kangyur]], the Kagyu scholar [[3rd Karmapa, Rangjung Dorje]] additionally points out that it must also have an immediate aspect, with the power to give rise to the six primary consciousnesses.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Rinpoche |first1= Thrangu |author-link =Thrangu Rinpoche | translator-last1 = Roberts | translator-first1 = Peter Alan | title=Transcending Ego: Distinguishing Consciousness from Wisdom |publisher= Namo Buddha Publications |year= 2013 |isbn= 978-0-9628026-1-4 }}</ref>
All surviving schools of Buddhist thought accept&nbsp;–&nbsp;"in common"&nbsp;–&nbsp;the existence of the first six primary consciousnesses (Sanskrit: ''{{IAST|[[vijñāna]]}}'', {{bo|t=རྣམ་ཤེས་|w=rnam-shes}}).<ref name="Berzin MMF Quote">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=Mind and Mental Factors: the Fifty-one Types of Subsidiary Awareness|url=https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/science-of-mind/mind-mental-factors/primary-minds-and-the-51-mental-factors|publisher=Study Buddhism|access-date=4 June 2016|location=Berlin, Germany; June 2002; revised July, 2006|quote=Unlike the Western view of consciousness as a general faculty that can be aware of all sensory and mental objects, Buddhism differentiates six types of consciousness, each of which is specific to one sensory field or to the mental field.  A primary consciousness cognizes merely the essential nature (''ngo-bo'') of an object, which means the category of phenomenon to which something belongs.  For example, eye consciousness cognizes a sight as merely a sight.  The Chittamatra schools add two more types of primary consciousness to make their list of an eightfold network of primary consciousnesses (''rnam-shes tshogs-brgyad''): deluded awareness (''nyon-yid''), ''alayavijnana'' (''kun-gzhi rnam-shes'', all-encompassing foundation consciousness, storehouse consciousness).  ''Alayavijnana'' is an individual consciousness, not a universal one, underlying all moments of cognition.  It cognizes the same objects as the cognitions it underlies, but is a nondetermining cognition of what appears to it (''snang-la ma-nges-pa'', inattentive cognition) and lacks clarity of its objects.  It carries karmic legacies (''sa-bon'') and the mental impressions of memories, in the sense that both are nonstatic abstractions imputed on the ''alayavijnana''.  The continuity of an individual ''alayavijnana'' ceases with the attainment of enlightenment.}}</ref>  The internally coherent {{IAST|Yogācāra}} school associated with [[Maitreya]], [[Asaṅga]], and [[Vasubandhu]], however, uniquely&nbsp;–&nbsp;or "uncommonly"&nbsp;–&nbsp;also posits the existence of two additional primary consciousnesses, ''kliṣṭamanovijñāna'' and ''{{IAST|ālayavijñāna}}'', in order to explain the workings of ''[[karma]]''.<ref name="Sparham" />  The first six of these primary consciousnesses comprise the five sensory faculties together with mental consciousness, which is counted as the sixth.<ref name="Berzin Primary">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xprimary_20consciousness|work=Primary Consciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=14 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Within a cognition of an object, the awareness of merely the essential nature of the object that the cognition focuses on.  Primary consciousness has the identity-nature of being an individualizing awareness.}}</ref> The '' kliṣṭamanovijñāna '' is described as an afflicted consciousness, which exhibits an ongoing subtle clinging to self that provides the basis for the ego and [[Kleshas (Buddhism) |disturbing emotions]]. Based on the [[Kangyur]], the Kagyu scholar [[3rd Karmapa, Rangjung Dorje]] additionally points out that it must also have an immediate aspect, with the power to give rise to the six primary consciousnesses.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Rinpoche |first1= Thrangu |author-link =Thrangu Rinpoche | translator-last1 = Roberts | translator-first1 = Peter Alan | title=Transcending Ego: Distinguishing Consciousness from Wisdom |publisher= Namo Buddha Publications |year= 2013 |isbn= 978-0-9628026-1-4 }}</ref>
  According to Gareth Sparham, <blockquote>The ''{{IAST|ālaya-vijñāna}}'' doctrine arose on the Indian subcontinent about one thousand years before Tsong kha pa.  It gained its place in a distinctly {{IAST|Yogācāra}} system over a period of some three hundred years stretching from 100 to 400 {{smallcaps|C.E.}}, culminating in the ''{{IAST|[[Mahāyānasaṃgraha]]}}'', a short text by Asaṅga (circa 350), setting out a systematic presentation of the ''{{IAST|ālaya-vijñāna}}'' doctrine developed over the previous centuries.  It is the doctrine found in this text in particular that Tsong kha pa, in his ''Ocean of Eloquence'', treats as having been revealed in toto by the Buddha and transmitted to suffering humanity through the {{IAST|Yogācāra}} founding saints (Tib. ''shing rta srol byed''): Maitreya<nowiki>[-nātha]</nowiki>, Asaṅga, and Vasubandhu.<ref name="Sparham" /></blockquote>While some noteworthy modern scholars of the [[Gelug]] tradition (which was founded by [[Je Tsongkhapa|Tsongkhapa]]'s reforms to [[Atisha]]'s [[Kadam (Tibetan Buddhism)|Kadam]] school) assert that the ''{{IAST|ālāyavijñāna}}'' is posited only in the Yogācāra philosophical tenet system, all non-Gelug schools of Tibetan buddhism maintain that the ''{{IAST|ālāyavijñāna}}'' is accepted by the various [[Madhyamaka]] schools, as well.<ref name="Berzin AEFC">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossart of Buddhist Terms: 'All-encompassing Foundation Consciousness'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xall-encompassing_20foundation_20consciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=An unspecified, nonobstructive, individual consciousness that underlies all cognition, cognizes the same objects as the cognitions it underlies, but is a nondetermining cognition of what appears to it and lacks clarity of its objects.  It carries the karmic legacies of karma and the mental impressions of memories, in the sense that they are imputed on it.  It is also translated as 'foundation consciousness' and, by some translators, as 'storehouse consciousness.'  According to Gelug, asserted only by the Chittamatra system; according to non-Gelug, asserted by both the Chittamatra and Madhyamaka systems.}}</ref>  The {{IAST|Yogācāra}} eightfold network of primary consciousnesses&nbsp;–&nbsp;''{{IAST|[[aṣṭavijñānāni]]}}'' in Sanskrit (from compounding ''{{IAST|[[aṣṭa]]}}'', "eight", with ''{{IAST|vijñānāni}}'', the plural of ''vijñāna'' "consciousnesses"), or {{bo|t=རྣམ་ཤེས་ཚོགས་བརྒྱད་|w=rnam-shes tshogs-brgyad}}&nbsp;–&nbsp; is roughly sketched out in the following table.
  According to Gareth Sparham, <blockquote>The ''{{IAST|ālaya-vijñāna}}'' doctrine arose on the Indian subcontinent about one thousand years before Tsong kha pa.  It gained its place in a distinctly {{IAST|Yogācāra}} system over a period of some three hundred years stretching from 100 to 400 {{smallcaps|C.E.}}, culminating in the ''{{IAST|[[Mahāyānasaṃgraha]]}}'', a short text by Asaṅga (circa 350), setting out a systematic presentation of the ''{{IAST|ālaya-vijñāna}}'' doctrine developed over the previous centuries.  It is the doctrine found in this text in particular that Tsong kha pa, in his ''Ocean of Eloquence'', treats as having been revealed in toto by the Buddha and transmitted to suffering humanity through the {{IAST|Yogācāra}} founding saints (Tib. ''shing rta srol byed''): Maitreya<nowiki>[-nātha]</nowiki>, Asaṅga, and Vasubandhu.<ref name="Sparham" /></blockquote>While some noteworthy modern scholars of the [[Gelug]] tradition (which was founded by [[Je Tsongkhapa|Tsongkhapa]]'s reforms to [[Atisha]]'s [[Kadam (Tibetan Buddhism)|Kadam]] school) assert that the ''{{IAST|ālāyavijñāna}}'' is posited only in the Yogācāra philosophical tenet system, all non-Gelug schools of Tibetan buddhism maintain that the ''{{IAST|ālāyavijñāna}}'' is accepted by the various [[Madhyamaka]] schools, as well.<ref name="Berzin AEFC">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossart of Buddhist Terms: 'All-encompassing Foundation Consciousness'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xall-encompassing_20foundation_20consciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=An unspecified, nonobstructive, individual consciousness that underlies all cognition, cognizes the same objects as the cognitions it underlies, but is a nondetermining cognition of what appears to it and lacks clarity of its objects.  It carries the karmic legacies of karma and the mental impressions of memories, in the sense that they are imputed on it.  It is also translated as 'foundation consciousness' and, by some translators, as 'storehouse consciousness.'  According to Gelug, asserted only by the Chittamatra system; according to non-Gelug, asserted by both the Chittamatra and Madhyamaka systems.}}</ref>  The {{IAST|Yogācāra}} eightfold network of primary consciousnesses&nbsp;–&nbsp;''{{IAST|[[aṣṭavijñānāni]]}}'' in Sanskrit (from compounding ''{{IAST|[[aṣṭa]]}}'', "eight", with ''{{IAST|vijñānāni}}'', the plural of ''vijñāna'' "consciousnesses"), or {{bo|t=རྣམ་ཤེས་ཚོགས་བརྒྱད་|w=rnam-shes tshogs-brgyad}}&nbsp;–&nbsp; is roughly sketched out in the following table.


{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1"
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align: center;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" border="1"
Line 16: Line 16:
|-
|-
| rowspan="2" |'''Subgroups'''
| rowspan="2" |'''Subgroups'''
| colspan="4" | '''Name'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[Nāma|nama]]'' = {{bo|t=མིང་|w=ming}} = English "name".<ref name="Berzin Name">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Name'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xname|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A combination of sounds that are assigned a meaning.}}</ref>|name=name|group=lower-greek}} of '''Consciousness'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''vijñāna'' = {{bo|t=རྣམ་ཤེས་|w=rnam-shes}} = English "consciousness".<ref name="Berzin Consciousness">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Consciousness'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xconsciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A class of ways of being aware of something that cognizes merely the essential nature of its object, such as its being a sight, a sound, a mental object, etc.  Consciousness may be either sensory or mental, and there are either six or eight types.  The term has nothing to do with the Western concept of conscious versus unconscious.}}</ref>|name=consciousness|group=lower-greek}}
| colspan="4" | '''Name'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[Nāma|nama]]'' = {{bo|t=མིང་|w=ming}} = English "name".<ref name="Berzin Name">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Name'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xname|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A combination of sounds that are assigned a meaning.}}</ref>|name=name|group=lower-greek}} of '''Consciousness'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''vijñāna'' = {{bo|t=རྣམ་ཤེས་|w=rnam-shes}} = English "consciousness".<ref name="Berzin Consciousness">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Consciousness'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xconsciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A class of ways of being aware of something that cognizes merely the essential nature of its object, such as its being a sight, a sound, a mental object, etc.  Consciousness may be either sensory or mental, and there are either six or eight types.  The term has nothing to do with the Western concept of conscious versus unconscious.}}</ref>|name=consciousness|group=lower-greek}}
| colspan="3" | Associated '''Nonstatic Phænomena'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[anitya]]'' = {{bo|t=མི་རྟག་པ་|w=mi-rtag-pa}} = English "nonstatic phænomenon".<ref name="Berzin Nonstatic">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Nonstatic Phenomenon'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xnonstatic_20phenomenon|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Phenomena that are affected and supported by causes and circumstances and, consequently, change from moment to moment, and which produce effects.  Their streams of continuity may have a beginning and an end, a beginning and no end, no beginning but an end, or no beginning and no end.  Some translators render the term as 'impermanent phenomena.'  They include forms of physical phenomena, ways of being aware of something, and noncongruent affecting variables, which are neither of the two.}}</ref>|name=nonstatic|group=lower-greek}} in terms of '''Three Circles of Action'''{{refn|1={{bo|t=འཁོར་ལོ་གསུམ་|w='khor-lo gsum}} = English "three circles" of action.<ref name="Berzin Three Circles">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Three Circles'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xthree_20circles|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Three aspects of an action that are all equally void of true existence: (1) the individual performing the action, (2) the object upon or toward which the action is committed, and (3) the action itself.  Occasionally, as in the case of the action of giving, the object may refer to the object given.  The existence of each of these is established dependently on the others.  Sometimes translated as 'the three spheres' of an action.}}</ref>|name=circles|group=lower-greek}}
| colspan="3" | Associated '''Nonstatic Phænomena'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[anitya]]'' = {{bo|t=མི་རྟག་པ་|w=mi-rtag-pa}} = English "nonstatic phænomenon".<ref name="Berzin Nonstatic">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Nonstatic Phenomenon'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xnonstatic_20phenomenon|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Phenomena that are affected and supported by causes and circumstances and, consequently, change from moment to moment, and which produce effects.  Their streams of continuity may have a beginning and an end, a beginning and no end, no beginning but an end, or no beginning and no end.  Some translators render the term as 'impermanent phenomena.'  They include forms of physical phenomena, ways of being aware of something, and noncongruent affecting variables, which are neither of the two.}}</ref>|name=nonstatic|group=lower-greek}} in terms of '''Three Circles of Action'''{{refn|1={{bo|t=འཁོར་ལོ་གསུམ་|w='khor-lo gsum}} = English "three circles" of action.<ref name="Berzin Three Circles">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Three Circles'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xthree_20circles|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Three aspects of an action that are all equally void of true existence: (1) the individual performing the action, (2) the object upon or toward which the action is committed, and (3) the action itself.  Occasionally, as in the case of the action of giving, the object may refer to the object given.  The existence of each of these is established dependently on the others.  Sometimes translated as 'the three spheres' of an action.}}</ref>|name=circles|group=lower-greek}}
|-
|-
| '''English'''
| '''English'''
Line 23: Line 23:
| '''Tibetan'''
| '''Tibetan'''
| '''Chinese'''
| '''Chinese'''
| Cognitive '''Object'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[Rūpa|rupa]]'' = {{bo|t=གཟུགས་|w=gzugs}} = English "form(s) of physical phænomena".<ref name="Berzin Forms">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Forms of Physical Phenomena'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xforms_20of_20physical_20phenomena|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Nonstatic phenomena that can either (1) transform into another form of physical phenomenon when two or more of them come into contact with each other, such as water and earth which can transform into mud, or (2) be known as what they are by analyzing their directional parts, such as the sight of a vase seen in a dream.  Forms of physical phenomena include the nonstatic phenomena of forms and eye sensors, sounds and ear sensors, smells and nose sensors, tastes and tongue sensors, physical sensations and body sensors, and forms of physical phenomena included only among cognitive stimulators that are all phenomena.  Equivalent to the aggregate of forms of physical phenomena.}}</ref>|name=form|group=lower-greek}}
| Cognitive '''Object'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[Rūpa|rupa]]'' = {{bo|t=གཟུགས་|w=gzugs}} = English "form(s) of physical phænomena".<ref name="Berzin Forms">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Forms of Physical Phenomena'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xforms_20of_20physical_20phenomena|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Nonstatic phenomena that can either (1) transform into another form of physical phenomenon when two or more of them come into contact with each other, such as water and earth which can transform into mud, or (2) be known as what they are by analyzing their directional parts, such as the sight of a vase seen in a dream.  Forms of physical phenomena include the nonstatic phenomena of forms and eye sensors, sounds and ear sensors, smells and nose sensors, tastes and tongue sensors, physical sensations and body sensors, and forms of physical phenomena included only among cognitive stimulators that are all phenomena.  Equivalent to the aggregate of forms of physical phenomena.}}</ref>|name=form|group=lower-greek}}
| Type of '''Cognition'''{{refn|1={{bo|t=ཤེས་པ་|w=shes-pa}} = English "cognition".<ref name="Berzin Cognition">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Cognition'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xcognition|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=(1) The act of cognizing or knowing something, but without necessarily knowing what it is or what it means.  It may be either valid or invalid, conceptual or nonconceptual .  This is the most general term for knowing something.  (2) The 'package' of a primary consciousness, its accompanying mental factors (subsidiary awarenesses), and the cognitive object shared by all of them.  According to some systems, a cognition also includes reflexive awareness.}}</ref>|name=cognition|group=lower-greek}}
| Type of '''Cognition'''{{refn|1={{bo|t=ཤེས་པ་|w=shes-pa}} = English "cognition".<ref name="Berzin Cognition">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Cognition'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xcognition|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=(1) The act of cognizing or knowing something, but without necessarily knowing what it is or what it means.  It may be either valid or invalid, conceptual or nonconceptual .  This is the most general term for knowing something.  (2) The 'package' of a primary consciousness, its accompanying mental factors (subsidiary awarenesses), and the cognitive object shared by all of them.  According to some systems, a cognition also includes reflexive awareness.}}</ref>|name=cognition|group=lower-greek}}
| Cognitive '''Sensor'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[indriya]]'' = {{bo|t=དབང་པོ་|w=dbang-po}} = English "cognitive sensor".<ref name="Berzin Cognitive Sensor">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Cognitive Sensor'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xcognitive_20sensor|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=The dominating condition that determines the type of cognition a way of being aware of something is.  In the case of the five types of sensory cognition, it is the photosensitive cells of the eyes, the sound-sensitive cells of the ears, the smell-sensitive cells of the nose, the taste-sensitive cells of the tongue, and the physical-sensation-sensitive cells of the body.  In the case of mental cognition, it is the immediately preceding moment of cognition.  Some translators render the term as 'sense power.'}}</ref>|name=sensor|group=lower-greek}}
| Cognitive '''Sensor'''{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[indriya]]'' = {{bo|t=དབང་པོ་|w=dbang-po}} = English "cognitive sensor".<ref name="Berzin Cognitive Sensor">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Cognitive Sensor'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xcognitive_20sensor|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=The dominating condition that determines the type of cognition a way of being aware of something is.  In the case of the five types of sensory cognition, it is the photosensitive cells of the eyes, the sound-sensitive cells of the ears, the smell-sensitive cells of the nose, the taste-sensitive cells of the tongue, and the physical-sensation-sensitive cells of the body.  In the case of mental cognition, it is the immediately preceding moment of cognition.  Some translators render the term as 'sense power.'}}</ref>|name=sensor|group=lower-greek}}
|-
|-
|-
|-
| rowspan="7" | '''I.&nbsp;–&nbsp;VI.'''
| rowspan="7" | '''I.&nbsp;–&nbsp;VI.'''


Each of these '''Six Common Consciousnesses'''&nbsp;–&nbsp; referred to in Sanskrit as ''pravṛttivijñānāni''<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Delhey|first=Martin|date=2016|title=The Indian Yogācāra Master Sthiramati and His Views on the Ālayavijñāna Concept|url=https://www.academia.edu/30666219|journal=Academy of Buddhist Studies, Dongguk University|volume=26|issue=2|pages= 11–35|postscript=From page 18: "aṣṭau vijñānāni vijñānaskandhaḥ: ṣaṭ pravṛttivijñānāni, ālayavijñānaṃ, kliṣṭaṃ ca manaḥ" rendered as "the personality constituent consciousness consists of  the eight forms of consciousness: the six manifest forms of mind, the ālayavijñāna and the defiled mind|via=Academia.edu}}</ref>{{refn|Sanskrit ''[[pravṛtti-vijñāna]]'' refers to the first six consciousnesses which derive from direct sensory (including mental) cognition.<ref name="Sparham">{{cite book|author3=Tsoṅ-kha-pa Blo-bzaṅ-grags-pa 1357–1419|title=Yid daṅ kun gźi'i dka' ba'i gnas rgya cher 'grel pa legs par bśad pa'i legs par bśad pa'i rgya mdzo: Ocean of Eloquence: Tsong kha pa's Commentary on the Yogācāra Doctrine of Mind |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sX4RtxEUlLgC&pg=PR4|access-date=6 February 2013|year=1993|publisher=State University of New York Press (SUNY)|location=Albany, NY, United States |isbn=0-7914-1479-5 |author1=Gareth Sparham, translator|edition= 1st |author2=Shotaro Iida|language=en, bo|chapter-format=alk. paper|chapter=Introduction}}</ref>{{rp|11}}|name=sparham|group=lower-greek}}&nbsp;–&nbsp;are posited on the basis of '''valid straightforward cognition<!-- n.b.: "valid" and "straightforward" are neither value judgments (i.e., per [[WP:NPOV]]) nor original synthesis (per [[WP:NOR]] or [[WP:NOS]]) on my part, but an integral part of Berzin's translation of a specific Tibetan technical term and its Sanskrit correlate into English as a compound noun -->''',{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[pratyakshapramana]]'' = {{bo|t=མངོན་སུམ་ཚད་མ་|w=mngon-sum tshad-ma}} = English "valid straightforward cognition".<ref name="Berzin Valid Straightforward Cognition">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Valid Straightforward Cognition'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xvalid_20straightforward_20cognition|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013 |location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Straightforward cognition that is nonfallacious. See: straightforward cognition.}}</ref> |name=valid|group=lower-greek}} on any individual practitioner's part, of sensory data input experienced solely by means of their bodily sense faculties.
Each of these '''Six Common Consciousnesses'''&nbsp;–&nbsp; referred to in Sanskrit as ''pravṛttivijñānāni''<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Delhey|first=Martin|date=2016|title=The Indian Yogācāra Master Sthiramati and His Views on the Ālayavijñāna Concept|url=https://www.academia.edu/30666219|journal=Academy of Buddhist Studies, Dongguk University|volume=26|issue=2|pages= 11–35|postscript=From page 18: "aṣṭau vijñānāni vijñānaskandhaḥ: ṣaṭ pravṛttivijñānāni, ālayavijñānaṃ, kliṣṭaṃ ca manaḥ" rendered as "the personality constituent consciousness consists of  the eight forms of consciousness: the six manifest forms of mind, the ālayavijñāna and the defiled mind|via=Academia.edu}}</ref>{{refn|Sanskrit ''[[pravṛtti-vijñāna]]'' refers to the first six consciousnesses which derive from direct sensory (including mental) cognition.<ref name="Sparham">{{cite book|author3=Tsoṅ-kha-pa Blo-bzaṅ-grags-pa 1357–1419|title=Yid daṅ kun gźi'i dka' ba'i gnas rgya cher 'grel pa legs par bśad pa'i legs par bśad pa'i rgya mdzo: Ocean of Eloquence: Tsong kha pa's Commentary on the Yogācāra Doctrine of Mind |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sX4RtxEUlLgC&pg=PR4|access-date=6 February 2013|year=1993|publisher=State University of New York Press (SUNY)|location=Albany, NY, United States |isbn=0-7914-1479-5 |author1=Gareth Sparham, translator|edition= 1st |author2=Shotaro Iida|language=en, bo|chapter-format=alk. paper|chapter=Introduction}}</ref>{{rp|11}}|name=sparham|group=lower-greek}}&nbsp;–&nbsp;are posited on the basis of '''valid straightforward cognition<!-- n.b.: "valid" and "straightforward" are neither value judgments (i.e., per [[WP:NPOV]]) nor original synthesis (per [[WP:NOR]] or [[WP:NOS]]) on my part, but an integral part of Berzin's translation of a specific Tibetan technical term and its Sanskrit correlate into English as a compound noun -->''',{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''[[pratyakshapramana]]'' = {{bo|t=མངོན་སུམ་ཚད་མ་|w=mngon-sum tshad-ma}} = English "valid straightforward cognition".<ref name="Berzin Valid Straightforward Cognition">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Valid Straightforward Cognition'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xvalid_20straightforward_20cognition|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013 |location=Berlin, Germany|quote=Straightforward cognition that is nonfallacious. See: straightforward cognition.}}</ref> |name=valid|group=lower-greek}} on any individual practitioner's part, of sensory data input experienced solely by means of their bodily sense faculties.


The derivation of this particular dual classification ''schema'' for these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses has its origins in the first four [[Nikāya]]s of the [[Sutta Pitaka]]&nbsp;–&nbsp;the second division of the [[Tipitaka]] in the [[Pali Canon]]&nbsp;–&nbsp;as first committed to writing during the [[Theravada]] school's fourth council at Sri Lanka in 83 (BCE).<ref name="Berzin Fourth Council">{{cite web |last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=A Brief History of Buddhism in India before the Thirteenth-Century Invasions|url=http://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/history-culture/buddhism-in-india/buddhism-in-india-before-the-13th-century-invasions|publisher=Study Buddhism|access-date=4 June 2016|location=Berlin, Germany; January, 2002; revised April, 2007|quote=The Theravada and Sarvastivada Schools each held their own fourth councils. The Theravada School held its fourth council in 83 BCE in Sri Lanka.  In the face of various groups having splintered off from Theravada over differences in interpretation of Buddha words (sic.), Maharakkhita and five hundred Theravada elders met to recite and write down Buddha’s words in order to preserve their authenticity. This was the first time Buddha’s teachings were put into written form and, in this case, they were rendered into the Pali language. This version of The Three Basket-like Collections, The Tipitaka, is commonly known as The Pali Canon. The other Hinayana Schools, however, continued to transmit the teachings in oral form.}}</ref>
The derivation of this particular dual classification ''schema'' for these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses has its origins in the first four [[Nikāya]]s of the [[Sutta Pitaka]]&nbsp;–&nbsp;the second division of the [[Tipitaka]] in the [[Pali Canon]]&nbsp;–&nbsp;as first committed to writing during the [[Theravada]] school's fourth council at Sri Lanka in 83 (BCE).<ref name="Berzin Fourth Council">{{cite web |last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=A Brief History of Buddhism in India before the Thirteenth-Century Invasions|url=https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/history-culture/buddhism-in-india/buddhism-in-india-before-the-13th-century-invasions|publisher=Study Buddhism|access-date=4 June 2016|location=Berlin, Germany; January, 2002; revised April, 2007|quote=The Theravada and Sarvastivada Schools each held their own fourth councils. The Theravada School held its fourth council in 83 BCE in Sri Lanka.  In the face of various groups having splintered off from Theravada over differences in interpretation of Buddha words (sic.), Maharakkhita and five hundred Theravada elders met to recite and write down Buddha’s words in order to preserve their authenticity. This was the first time Buddha’s teachings were put into written form and, in this case, they were rendered into the Pali language. This version of The Three Basket-like Collections, The Tipitaka, is commonly known as The Pali Canon. The other Hinayana Schools, however, continued to transmit the teachings in oral form.}}</ref>


Both individually and collectively: these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses are posited&nbsp;–&nbsp;in common&nbsp;–&nbsp;by all surviving buddhist tenet systems.
Both individually and collectively: these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses are posited&nbsp;–&nbsp;in common&nbsp;–&nbsp;by all surviving buddhist tenet systems.
Line 87: Line 87:
|-
|-
| VI.
| VI.
Mental Consciousness{{refn|1=Sanskrit  ''[[mano-vijñāna]]'' = {{bo|t=ཡིད་ཀྱི་རྣམ་ཤེས་|w=yid-kyi rnam-shes}} = English "mental consciousness".<ref name="Berzin Mental Consciousness">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Mental Consciousness'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xmental_20consciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A primary consciousness that can take any existent phenomenon as its object and which relies on merely the previous moment of cognition as its dominating condition and not on any physical sensors.}}</ref>|name=mental|group=lower-greek}}
Mental Consciousness{{refn|1=Sanskrit  ''[[mano-vijñāna]]'' = {{bo|t=ཡིད་ཀྱི་རྣམ་ཤེས་|w=yid-kyi rnam-shes}} = English "mental consciousness".<ref name="Berzin Mental Consciousness">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Mental Consciousness'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xmental_20consciousness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A primary consciousness that can take any existent phenomenon as its object and which relies on merely the previous moment of cognition as its dominating condition and not on any physical sensors.}}</ref>|name=mental|group=lower-greek}}
| ''manovijñāna''<ref name="Sparham" />
| ''manovijñāna''<ref name="Sparham" />
| ༦
| ༦
Line 98: Line 98:
| '''VII.'''
| '''VII.'''


This '''Seventh Consciousness''', posited on the basis of '''straightforward cognition''' in combination with '''inferential cognition''',{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''{{IAST|[[anumana]]}}'' = {{bo|t=རྗེས་དཔག་|w=rjes-dpag}} = English "inferential cognition".<ref name="Berzin Inferential">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Inferential Cognition'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xinferential_20cognition|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A valid conceptual way of cognizing an obscure object through reliance on a correct line of reasoning as its basis.}}</ref>|name=inferential|group=lower-greek}} is asserted, uncommonly, in {{IAST|Yogācāra}}.<ref name="Sparham" />
This '''Seventh Consciousness''', posited on the basis of '''straightforward cognition''' in combination with '''inferential cognition''',{{refn|1=Sanskrit ''{{IAST|[[anumana]]}}'' = {{bo|t=རྗེས་དཔག་|w=rjes-dpag}} = English "inferential cognition".<ref name="Berzin Inferential">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Inferential Cognition'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xinferential_20cognition|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=7 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A valid conceptual way of cognizing an obscure object through reliance on a correct line of reasoning as its basis.}}</ref>|name=inferential|group=lower-greek}} is asserted, uncommonly, in {{IAST|Yogācāra}}.<ref name="Sparham" />
| VII.
| VII.
Deluded awareness{{refn|1={{bo|t=ཉོན་ཡིད་་|w=nyon-yid}} = English "deluded awareness".<ref name="Berzin Deluded Awareness">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Deluded Awareness'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xdeluded_20awareness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A primary consciousness that is aimed at the alayavijnana in the Chittamatra system, or at the alaya for habits in the dzogchen system, and grasps at it to be the 'me' to be refuted.}}</ref>|name=deluded|group=lower-greek}}
Deluded awareness{{refn|1={{bo|t=ཉོན་ཡིད་་|w=nyon-yid}} = English "deluded awareness".<ref name="Berzin Deluded Awareness">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Deluded Awareness'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xdeluded_20awareness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A primary consciousness that is aimed at the alayavijnana in the Chittamatra system, or at the alaya for habits in the dzogchen system, and grasps at it to be the 'me' to be refuted.}}</ref>|name=deluded|group=lower-greek}}
| ''[[Manas-vijnana|manas]]'', ''{{IAST|[[kliṣṭa-manas]]}}'',<ref name="Sparham" /> ''kliṣṭamanovijñāna'',<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.buddhism-dict.net/cgi-bin/xpr-ddb.pl?q=%E5%85%AB%E8%AD%98|title=Digital Dictionary of Buddhism - 八識|last=Muller|first=Charles|date=1997-09-15|website=DDB}}{{Dead link|date=December 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>  
| ''[[Manas-vijnana|manas]]'', ''{{IAST|[[kliṣṭa-manas]]}}'',<ref name="Sparham" /> ''kliṣṭamanovijñāna'',<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.buddhism-dict.net/cgi-bin/xpr-ddb.pl?q=%E5%85%AB%E8%AD%98|title=Digital Dictionary of Buddhism - 八識|last=Muller|first=Charles|date=1997-09-15|website=DDB}}{{Dead link|date=December 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>  
| ༧
| ༧
Line 106: Line 106:
| {{lang|zh|末那識}}
| {{lang|zh|末那識}}
| The eighth consciousness (which it grasps to as a self)<ref>Williams, Paul (2008). ''Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations'', Routledge, p. 97.</ref>
| The eighth consciousness (which it grasps to as a self)<ref>Williams, Paul (2008). ''Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations'', Routledge, p. 97.</ref>
| Disturbing emotion or attitude (Skt.: ''kleśa''){{refn|1=Sanskrit ''{{IAST|[[Kleshas (Buddhism)|klesha]]}}'' = {{bo|t=ཉོན་མོངས་|w=nyon-mongs}} = English "disturbing emotion or attitude"<ref name="Berzin Disturbing">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Disturbing Emotion or Attitude'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xdisturbing_20emotion_20or_20attitude|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A subsidiary awareness (mental factor) that, when it arises, causes oneself to lose peace of mind and incapacitates oneself so that one loses self-control.  An indication that one is experiencing a disturbing emotion or attitude is that it makes oneself and/or others feel uncomfortable.  Some translators render this term as 'afflictive emotions' or 'emotional afflictions.'}}</ref> – also called "moving mind", or [[mind monkey]], in some Chinese and Japanese schools.|name=disturbing|group=lower-greek}}
| Disturbing emotion or attitude (Skt.: ''kleśa''){{refn|1=Sanskrit ''{{IAST|[[Kleshas (Buddhism)|klesha]]}}'' = {{bo|t=ཉོན་མོངས་|w=nyon-mongs}} = English "disturbing emotion or attitude"<ref name="Berzin Disturbing">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Disturbing Emotion or Attitude'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xdisturbing_20emotion_20or_20attitude|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=A subsidiary awareness (mental factor) that, when it arises, causes oneself to lose peace of mind and incapacitates oneself so that one loses self-control.  An indication that one is experiencing a disturbing emotion or attitude is that it makes oneself and/or others feel uncomfortable.  Some translators render this term as 'afflictive emotions' or 'emotional afflictions.'}}</ref> – also called "moving mind", or [[mind monkey]], in some Chinese and Japanese schools.|name=disturbing|group=lower-greek}}
| Mind
| Mind
|-
|-
Line 123: Line 123:
{{lang|zh|本識}}
{{lang|zh|本識}}
| The surrounding world, the "receptacle" or "container"  (''bhājana'') world <ref>Schmithausen, Lambert (1987). ''Ālayavijñāna: on the origin and the early development of a central concept of Yogācāra philosophy'', Part I: Text, page 89. Tokyo, International Institute for Buddhist Studies, Studia Philologica Buddhica Monograph Series IVa.</ref>
| The surrounding world, the "receptacle" or "container"  (''bhājana'') world <ref>Schmithausen, Lambert (1987). ''Ālayavijñāna: on the origin and the early development of a central concept of Yogācāra philosophy'', Part I: Text, page 89. Tokyo, International Institute for Buddhist Studies, Studia Philologica Buddhica Monograph Series IVa.</ref>
| Reflexive awareness{{refn|1={{bo|t=རང་རིག་|w=rang-rig}} = English "reflexive awareness"<ref name="Berzin Reflexive">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Reflexive Awareness'|url=http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xreflexive_20awareness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=(1) The cognitive faculty within a cognition, asserted in the Sautrantika and Chittamatra tenet systems, that takes as its cognitive object the consciousness within the cognition that it is part of.  It also cognizes the validity or invalidity of the cognition that it is part of, and accounts for the ability to recall the cognition.  (2) In the non-Gelug schools, this cognitive faculty becomes reflexive deep awareness -- that part of an arya's nonconceptual cognition of voidness that cognizes the two truths of that nonconceptual cognition.}}</ref>  in non-[[Gelug]] presentations of [[Sautrantika]] and [[Chittamatra]] tenet systems.|name=reflexive|group=lower-greek}}
| Reflexive awareness{{refn|1={{bo|t=རང་རིག་|w=rang-rig}} = English "reflexive awareness"<ref name="Berzin Reflexive">{{cite web|last=Berzin|first=Alexander|title=English Glossary of Buddhist Terms: 'Reflexive Awareness'|url=https://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/about/glossary/glossary.html#xreflexive_20awareness|publisher=The Berzin Archives|access-date=6 February 2013|location=Berlin, Germany|quote=(1) The cognitive faculty within a cognition, asserted in the Sautrantika and Chittamatra tenet systems, that takes as its cognitive object the consciousness within the cognition that it is part of.  It also cognizes the validity or invalidity of the cognition that it is part of, and accounts for the ability to recall the cognition.  (2) In the non-Gelug schools, this cognitive faculty becomes reflexive deep awareness -- that part of an arya's nonconceptual cognition of voidness that cognizes the two truths of that nonconceptual cognition.}}</ref>  in non-[[Gelug]] presentations of [[Sautrantika]] and [[Chittamatra]] tenet systems.|name=reflexive|group=lower-greek}}
| Mind
| Mind
|}
|}
Line 133: Line 133:
{{quote|"Monks, I will teach you the All. Listen & pay close attention. I will speak."<br />
{{quote|"Monks, I will teach you the All. Listen & pay close attention. I will speak."<br />
"As you say, lord," the monks responded.<br />
"As you say, lord," the monks responded.<br />
The Blessed One said, "What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. [1] Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn35/sn35.023.than.html|title=Sabba Sutta: The All|website=www.accesstoinsight.org}}</ref>}}
The Blessed One said, "What is the All? Simply the eye & forms, ear & sounds, nose & aromas, tongue & flavors, body & tactile sensations, intellect & ideas. This, monks, is called the All. [1] Anyone who would say, 'Repudiating this All, I will describe another,' if questioned on what exactly might be the grounds for his statement, would be unable to explain, and furthermore, would be put to grief. Why? Because it lies beyond range."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn35/sn35.023.than.html|title=Sabba Sutta: The All|website=www.accesstoinsight.org}}</ref>}}


The early Buddhist texts speak of [[anusaya|anusayā]] (Sanskrit: anuśayāḥ), the “underlying tendencies” or “latent dispositions” which keep beings caught in the circle of samsara. These potential tendencies are generally seen as unconscious processes which "lie beneath" our everyday consciousness, and according to Waldron "they represent the potential, the tendency, for cognitive and emotional afflictions (Pali: ''kilesā'', Sanskrit: ''kleśāḥ'') to arise".<ref name=":0">Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 33.</ref>
The early Buddhist texts speak of [[anusaya|anusayā]] (Sanskrit: anuśayāḥ), the “underlying tendencies” or “latent dispositions” which keep beings caught in the circle of samsara. These potential tendencies are generally seen as unconscious processes which "lie beneath" our everyday consciousness, and according to Waldron "they represent the potential, the tendency, for cognitive and emotional afflictions (Pali: ''kilesā'', Sanskrit: ''kleśāḥ'') to arise".<ref name=":0">Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 33.</ref>
Line 178: Line 178:
According to Yogācāra teachings, the seeds stored in the store consciousness of sentient beings are not pure.{{refn|group=note|name="individual"|Each being has his own one and only, formless and no-place-to-abide store-house consciousness. Our "being" is created by our own store-consciousness, according to the karma seeds stored in it. In "coming and going" we definitely do not own the "no-coming and no-going" store-house consciousness, rather we are owned by it. Just as a human image shown in a monitor can never be described as lasting for any instant, since "he" is just the production of electron currents of data stored and flow from the hard disk of the computer, so do seed-currents drain from the store-consciousness, never last from one moment to the next.}}
According to Yogācāra teachings, the seeds stored in the store consciousness of sentient beings are not pure.{{refn|group=note|name="individual"|Each being has his own one and only, formless and no-place-to-abide store-house consciousness. Our "being" is created by our own store-consciousness, according to the karma seeds stored in it. In "coming and going" we definitely do not own the "no-coming and no-going" store-house consciousness, rather we are owned by it. Just as a human image shown in a monitor can never be described as lasting for any instant, since "he" is just the production of electron currents of data stored and flow from the hard disk of the computer, so do seed-currents drain from the store-consciousness, never last from one moment to the next.}}


The store consciousness, while being originally immaculate in itself, contains a "mysterious mixture of purity and defilement, good and evil". Because of this mixture the transformation of consciousness from defilement to purity can take place and [[Enlightenment in Buddhism|awakening]] is possible.<ref>''The Lankavatara Sutra, A Mahayana Text,'' Suzuki's introduction at p. xxvi, available online: [http://lirs.ru/do/lanka_eng/lanka-nondiacritical.htm].</ref>
The store consciousness, while being originally immaculate in itself, contains a "mysterious mixture of purity and defilement, good and evil". Because of this mixture the transformation of consciousness from defilement to purity can take place and [[Enlightenment in Buddhism|awakening]] is possible.<ref>''The Lankavatara Sutra, A Mahayana Text,'' Suzuki's introduction at p. xxvi, available online: [http://lirs.ru/do/lanka_eng/lanka-nondiacritical.htm] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230306145458/http://lirs.ru/do/lanka_eng/lanka-nondiacritical.htm |date=6 March 2023 }}.</ref>


Through the process of purification the dharma practitioner can become an [[Arhat]], when the four defilements of the mental functions{{refn|group=note|the mental functions (心所法),: self-delusion (我癡), self-view (我見), egotism (我慢), and self-love (我愛)}} of the manas-consciousness are purified.{{refn|group=note|By then the polluted mental functions of the first six consciousnesses would have been cleansed. The seventh or the manas-consciousness determines whether or not the seeds and the contentdrain from the alaya-vijnana breaks through, becoming a "function" to be perceived by us in the mental or physical world.}}{{refn|group=note|In contrast to an Arhat, a Buddha is one with all his seeds stored in the eighth Seed consciousness. Cleansed and substituted, bad for good, one for one, his polluted-seeds-containing eighth consciousness (Alaya Consciousness) becomes an all-seeds-purified eighth consciousness (Pure consciousness 無垢識 ), and he becomes a Buddha.}}
Through the process of purification the dharma practitioner can become an [[Arhat]], when the four defilements of the mental functions{{refn|group=note|the mental functions (心所法),: self-delusion (我癡), self-view (我見), egotism (我慢), and self-love (我愛)}} of the manas-consciousness are purified.{{refn|group=note|By then the polluted mental functions of the first six consciousnesses would have been cleansed. The seventh or the manas-consciousness determines whether or not the seeds and the contentdrain from the alaya-vijnana breaks through, becoming a "function" to be perceived by us in the mental or physical world.}}{{refn|group=note|In contrast to an Arhat, a Buddha is one with all his seeds stored in the eighth Seed consciousness. Cleansed and substituted, bad for good, one for one, his polluted-seeds-containing eighth consciousness (Alaya Consciousness) becomes an all-seeds-purified eighth consciousness (Pure consciousness 無垢識 ), and he becomes a Buddha.}}
Line 185: Line 185:
According to the [[Lankavatara Sutra|Laṅkāvatārasūtra]] and the schools of Chan and Zen Buddhism, the ālāyavijñāna is identical with the ''[[tathagata-garbha|tathāgatagarbha]]''{{refn|group=note|The womb or matrix of the Thus-come-one, the Buddha}}, and is fundamentally pure.<ref>Peter Harvey, ''Consciousness Mysticism in the Discourses of the Buddha.'' In Karel Werner, ed., ''The Yogi and the Mystic.'' Curzon Press 1989, pages 96-97.</ref>
According to the [[Lankavatara Sutra|Laṅkāvatārasūtra]] and the schools of Chan and Zen Buddhism, the ālāyavijñāna is identical with the ''[[tathagata-garbha|tathāgatagarbha]]''{{refn|group=note|The womb or matrix of the Thus-come-one, the Buddha}}, and is fundamentally pure.<ref>Peter Harvey, ''Consciousness Mysticism in the Discourses of the Buddha.'' In Karel Werner, ed., ''The Yogi and the Mystic.'' Curzon Press 1989, pages 96-97.</ref>


The equation of ālāyavijñāna and tathāgatagarbha was contested. It was seen as "something akin to the Hindu notions of ''ātman'' (permanent, invariant self) and ''{{IAST|prakṛti}}'' (primordial substrative nature from which all mental, emotional and physical things evolve)." According to Lusthaus, the critique led by the end of the eighth century to the rise of the logico-epistemic tradition of Yogācāra and a hybrid school combining ''Tathāgatagarbha'' thought with basic Yogācāra doctrines:<ref name=Lusthaus />
The equation of ālāyavijñāna and tathāgatagarbha was contested. It was seen as "something akin to the Hindu notions of ''ātman'' (permanent, invariant self) and ''{{IAST|prakṛti}}'' (primordial substrative nature from which all mental, emotional and physical things evolve)." According to [[Dan Lusthaus]], the critique led by the end of the eighth century to the rise of the logico-epistemic tradition of Yogācāra and a hybrid school combining ''Tathāgatagarbha'' thought with basic Yogācāra doctrines:<ref name=Lusthaus />


{{quote|The logico-epistemological wing in part sidestepped the critique by using the term ''citta-santāna'', "mind-stream", instead of ''ālaya-vijñāna'', for what amounted to roughly the same idea. It was easier to deny that a "stream" represented a reified self. On the other hand, the Tathāgatagarbha hybrid school was no stranger to the charge of smuggling notions of selfhood into its doctrines, since, for example, it explicitly defined the ''tathāgatagarbha'' as "permanent, pleasurable, ''self'', and pure (''nitya'', ''sukha'', ''ātman'', ''śuddha'')". Many Tathāgatagarbha texts, in fact, argue for the acceptance of selfhood (''ātman'') as a sign of higher accomplishment. The hybrid school attempted to conflate ''tathāgatagarbha'' with the ''ālaya-vijñāna''.<ref name=Lusthaus>{{cite web|last1=Lusthaus|first1=Jan|title=What is and isn't Yogācāra|url=http://www.acmuller.net/yogacara/articles/intro-uni.htm|access-date=12 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131216190312/http://www.acmuller.net/yogacara/articles/intro-uni.htm|archive-date=2013-12-16}}</ref>}}
{{quote|The logico-epistemological wing in part sidestepped the critique by using the term ''citta-santāna'', "mind-stream", instead of ''ālaya-vijñāna'', for what amounted to roughly the same idea. It was easier to deny that a "stream" represented a reified self. On the other hand, the Tathāgatagarbha hybrid school was no stranger to the charge of smuggling notions of selfhood into its doctrines, since, for example, it explicitly defined the ''tathāgatagarbha'' as "permanent, pleasurable, ''self'', and pure (''nitya'', ''sukha'', ''ātman'', ''śuddha'')". Many Tathāgatagarbha texts, in fact, argue for the acceptance of selfhood (''ātman'') as a sign of higher accomplishment. The hybrid school attempted to conflate ''tathāgatagarbha'' with the ''ālaya-vijñāna''.<ref name=Lusthaus>{{cite web|last1=Lusthaus|first1=Dan|title=What is and isn't Yogācāra|url=http://www.acmuller.net/yogacara/articles/intro-uni.htm|access-date=12 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131216190312/http://www.acmuller.net/yogacara/articles/intro-uni.htm|archive-date=2013-12-16}}</ref>}}


===Transformations of consciousness===
===Transformations of consciousness===
Line 217: Line 217:


==== Fǎxiàng and Huayan ====
==== Fǎxiàng and Huayan ====
According to Thomas McEvilley, although Vasubandhu had postulated numerous ālāya-vijñāna-s, a separate one for each individual person in the parakalpita,{{refn|group=note|name="individual"}} this multiplicity was later eliminated in the [[Dharma character school|Fǎxiàng]] and [[Huayan school|Huayan]] metaphysics.{{refn|group=note|See also [[Buddha-nature#Popularisation in Chinese Buddhism]]}} These schools inculcated instead the doctrine of a single universal and eternal ālaya-vijñāna. This exalted enstatement of the ālāyavijñāna is described in the Fǎxiàng as "primordial unity".<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vTfm8KHn900C&q=Fa-hsiang+Storehouse+McEvilley&pg=PA574|title=The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies|first=Thomas|last=McEvilley|date=7 February 2012|publisher=Allworth Press|isbn=9781581159332|via=Google Books}}</ref>
According to Thomas McEvilley, although Vasubandhu had postulated numerous ālāya-vijñāna-s, a separate one for each individual person in the parakalpita,{{refn|group=note|name="individual"}} this multiplicity was later eliminated in the [[Faxiang]] and [[Huayan school|Huayan]] metaphysics.{{refn|group=note|See also [[Buddha-nature#Popularisation in Chinese Buddhism]]}} These schools inculcated instead the doctrine of a single universal and eternal ālaya-vijñāna. This exalted enstatement of the ālāyavijñāna is described in the Fǎxiàng as "primordial unity".<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vTfm8KHn900C&q=Fa-hsiang+Storehouse+McEvilley&pg=PA574|title=The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies|first=Thomas|last=McEvilley|date=7 February 2012|publisher=Allworth Press|isbn=9781581159332|via=Google Books}}</ref>


Thomas McEvilley further argues that the presentation of the three natures by Vasubandhu is consistent with the Neo-platonist views of [[Plotinus]] and his universal 'One', 'Mind', and 'Soul'.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vTfm8KHn900C&q=Plotinian+Neoplatonism+Consciousness-Only+Storehouse+McEvilley&pg=PA572|title=The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies|first=Thomas|last=McEvilley|date=7 February 2012|publisher=Allworth Press|isbn=9781581159332|via=Google Books}}</ref>
Thomas McEvilley further argues that the presentation of the three natures by Vasubandhu is consistent with the Neo-platonist views of [[Plotinus]] and his universal 'One', 'Mind', and 'Soul'.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vTfm8KHn900C&q=Plotinian+Neoplatonism+Consciousness-Only+Storehouse+McEvilley&pg=PA572|title=The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies|first=Thomas|last=McEvilley|date=7 February 2012|publisher=Allworth Press|isbn=9781581159332|via=Google Books}}</ref>


====Chán====
====Chán====
A core teaching of Chan/Zen Buddhism describes the transformation of the Eight Consciousnesses into the [[Hakuin#Four ways of knowing|Four Wisdoms]].{{refn|group=note|It is found in Chapter 7 of the [[Platform Sutra]] of the Sixth Ancestor Zen Master [[Huineng]] and other Zen masters, such as [[Hakuin Ekaku]], in his work titled ''Keiso Dokuqui'',<ref>{{cite web|url=http://terebess.hu/zen/hakuin1.html#1|title=Hakuin Ekaku (1685-1768). Selected Writings|website=terebess.hu}}</ref> and [[Hsu Yun|Xuyun]], in his work titled ''Daily Lectures at Two Ch'an Weeks'', Week 1, Fourth Day.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hsuyun.budismo.net/en/dharma/chan_sessions3.html|title=Master Hsu Yun (Xu Yun) - Daily Lectures at Two Ch'an Weeks|website=hsuyun.budismo.net|access-date=8 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725085145/http://hsuyun.budismo.net/en/dharma/chan_sessions3.html|archive-date=25 July 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>}} In this teaching, Buddhist practice is to turn the light of awareness around, from misconceptions regarding the nature of reality as being external, to kenshō, "directly see one's own nature".{{Citation needed|date=June 2014}}. Thus the Eighth Consciousness is transformed into the Great Perfect Mirror Wisdom, the Seventh Consciousness into the Equality (Universal Nature) Wisdom, the Sixth Consciousness into the Profound Observing Wisdom, and First to Fifth Consciousnesses into the All Performing (Perfection of Action) Wisdom.
A core teaching of Chan/Zen Buddhism describes the transformation of the Eight Consciousnesses into the [[Hakuin#Four ways of knowing|Four Wisdoms]].{{refn|group=note|It is found in Chapter 7 of the [[Platform Sutra]] of the Sixth Ancestor Zen Master [[Huineng]] and other Zen masters, such as [[Hakuin Ekaku]], in his work titled ''Keiso Dokuqui'',<ref>{{cite web|url=https://terebess.hu/zen/hakuin1.html#1|title=Hakuin Ekaku (1685-1768). Selected Writings|website=terebess.hu}}</ref> and [[Hsu Yun|Xuyun]], in his work titled ''Daily Lectures at Two Ch'an Weeks'', Week 1, Fourth Day.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hsuyun.budismo.net/en/dharma/chan_sessions3.html|title=Master Hsu Yun (Xu Yun) - Daily Lectures at Two Ch'an Weeks|website=hsuyun.budismo.net|access-date=8 October 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110725085145/http://hsuyun.budismo.net/en/dharma/chan_sessions3.html|archive-date=25 July 2011|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>}} In this teaching, Buddhist practice is to turn the light of awareness around, from misconceptions regarding the nature of reality as being external, to kenshō, "directly see one's own nature".{{Citation needed|date=June 2014}}. Thus the Eighth Consciousness is transformed into the Great Perfect Mirror Wisdom, the Seventh Consciousness into the Equality (Universal Nature) Wisdom, the Sixth Consciousness into the Profound Observing Wisdom, and First to Fifth Consciousnesses into the All Performing (Perfection of Action) Wisdom.


===Korea===
===Korea===
Line 258: Line 258:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.budsas.org/ebud/ebdha195.htm Alayavijnana – Storehouse Consciousness], [[Walpola Rahula]], not dated; quotes the [[Pali Canon]]'s use of ''alaya'' and compares the Mahayana ''asrayaparavrtti'' and ''bijaparavrtti'' with [[Nikaya Buddhism]]'s ''alayasamugghata'', the "uprooting of ''alaya'', and ''khinabija'', one whose "seeds of defilement are destroyed".
* [https://www.budsas.org/ebud/ebdha195.htm Alayavijnana – Storehouse Consciousness], [[Walpola Rahula]], not dated; quotes the [[Pali Canon]]'s use of ''alaya'' and compares the Mahayana ''asrayaparavrtti'' and ''bijaparavrtti'' with [[Nikaya Buddhism]]'s ''alayasamugghata'', the "uprooting of ''alaya'', and ''khinabija'', one whose "seeds of defilement are destroyed".
*[https://www.boringworld.org/2021/02/eightfold-path.html Eightfold Path of Buddha]
*[https://www.boringworld.org/2021/02/eightfold-path.html Eightfold Path of Buddha] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240416075132/https://www.boringworld.org/2021/02/eightfold-path.html |date=16 April 2024 }}
* [http://online.sfsu.edu/~rone/Buddhism/Yogacara/BasicVersescontents.htm Verses Delineating the Eight Consciousnesses]
* [http://online.sfsu.edu/~rone/Buddhism/Yogacara/BasicVersescontents.htm Verses Delineating the Eight Consciousnesses] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120220003737/http://online.sfsu.edu/~rone/Buddhism/Yogacara/BasicVersescontents.htm |date=20 February 2012 }}
* Waldron, William S. (1995). ''[https://web.archive.org/web/20120814022827/http://www.gampoabbey.org/documents/Waldron%20HIIA-revised-b.pdf  How Innovative is the Ālayavijñāna?] The ālayavijñāna in the context of canonical and Abhidharma vijñāna theory.''
* Waldron, William S. (1995). ''[https://web.archive.org/web/20120814022827/http://www.gampoabbey.org/documents/Waldron%20HIIA-revised-b.pdf  How Innovative is the Ālayavijñāna?] The ālayavijñāna in the context of canonical and Abhidharma vijñāna theory.''


Latest revision as of 05:40, 23 November 2025

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Template:Mahayana Buddhism Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote".

The Eight Consciousnesses (Skt. aṣṭa vijñānakāyāḥ[1]) are a classification developed in the tradition of the Yogācāra school of Mahayana Buddhism. They enumerate the five sense consciousnesses, supplemented by the mental consciousness (manovijñāna), the defiled mental consciousness (kliṣṭamanovijñāna[2]), and finally the fundamental store-house consciousness (ālāyavijñāna), which is the basis of the other seven.[3] This eighth consciousness is said to store the impressions (vāsanāḥ) of previous experiences, which form the seeds (bīja) of future karma in this life and in the next after rebirth.

Template:Contains special characters

Eightfold network of primary consciousnesses

All surviving schools of Buddhist thought accept – "in common" – the existence of the first six primary consciousnesses (Sanskrit: Script error: No such module "lang"., Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: rnam-shes).[4] The internally coherent Script error: No such module "lang". school associated with Maitreya, Asaṅga, and Vasubandhu, however, uniquely – or "uncommonly" – also posits the existence of two additional primary consciousnesses, kliṣṭamanovijñāna and Script error: No such module "lang"., in order to explain the workings of karma.[5] The first six of these primary consciousnesses comprise the five sensory faculties together with mental consciousness, which is counted as the sixth.[6] The kliṣṭamanovijñāna is described as an afflicted consciousness, which exhibits an ongoing subtle clinging to self that provides the basis for the ego and disturbing emotions. Based on the Kangyur, the Kagyu scholar 3rd Karmapa, Rangjung Dorje additionally points out that it must also have an immediate aspect, with the power to give rise to the six primary consciousnesses.[7]

According to Gareth Sparham,

The Script error: No such module "lang". doctrine arose on the Indian subcontinent about one thousand years before Tsong kha pa. It gained its place in a distinctly Script error: No such module "lang". system over a period of some three hundred years stretching from 100 to 400 <templatestyles src="smallcaps/styles.css"/>C.E., culminating in the Script error: No such module "lang"., a short text by Asaṅga (circa 350), setting out a systematic presentation of the Script error: No such module "lang". doctrine developed over the previous centuries. It is the doctrine found in this text in particular that Tsong kha pa, in his Ocean of Eloquence, treats as having been revealed in toto by the Buddha and transmitted to suffering humanity through the Script error: No such module "lang". founding saints (Tib. shing rta srol byed): Maitreya[-nātha], Asaṅga, and Vasubandhu.[5]

While some noteworthy modern scholars of the Gelug tradition (which was founded by Tsongkhapa's reforms to Atisha's Kadam school) assert that the Script error: No such module "lang". is posited only in the Yogācāra philosophical tenet system, all non-Gelug schools of Tibetan buddhism maintain that the Script error: No such module "lang". is accepted by the various Madhyamaka schools, as well.[8] The Script error: No such module "lang". eightfold network of primary consciousnesses – Script error: No such module "lang". in Sanskrit (from compounding Script error: No such module "lang"., "eight", with Script error: No such module "lang"., the plural of vijñāna "consciousnesses"), or Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: rnam-shes tshogs-brgyad –  is roughly sketched out in the following table.

The Eightfold Network of Primary Consciousnesses[4]
Subgroups NameTemplate:Refn of ConsciousnessTemplate:Refn Associated Nonstatic PhænomenaTemplate:Refn in terms of Three Circles of ActionTemplate:Refn
English Sanskrit Tibetan Chinese Cognitive ObjectTemplate:Refn Type of CognitionTemplate:Refn Cognitive SensorTemplate:Refn
I. – VI.

Each of these Six Common Consciousnesses –  referred to in Sanskrit as pravṛttivijñānāni[9]Template:Refn – are posited on the basis of valid straightforward cognition,Template:Refn on any individual practitioner's part, of sensory data input experienced solely by means of their bodily sense faculties.

The derivation of this particular dual classification schema for these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses has its origins in the first four Nikāyas of the Sutta Pitaka – the second division of the Tipitaka in the Pali Canon – as first committed to writing during the Theravada school's fourth council at Sri Lanka in 83 (BCE).[10]

Both individually and collectively: these first six, so-called "common" consciousnesses are posited – in common – by all surviving buddhist tenet systems.

I.

Eye Consciousness

cakṣurvijñāna[5] ༡

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: mig-gi rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang". Sight(s) Seeing Eyes
II.

Ear Consciousness

śrotravijñāna[5] ༢

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: rna’i rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang". Sound(s) Hearing Ears
III.

Nose Consciousness

ghrāṇavijñāna[11] ༣

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: sna’i rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang". Smell(s) Smell Nose
IV.

Tongue Consciousness

jihvāvijñāna[12] ༤

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: lce’i rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang". Taste(s) Taste Tongue
V.

Body Consciousness

kāyavijñāna[13] ༥

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: lus-kyi rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang". Feeling(s) Touch Body
VI.

Mental ConsciousnessTemplate:Refn

manovijñāna[5] ༦

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: yid-kyi rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang". Thought(s) Ideation Mind
VII.

This Seventh Consciousness, posited on the basis of straightforward cognition in combination with inferential cognition,Template:Refn is asserted, uncommonly, in Script error: No such module "lang"..[5]

VII.

Deluded awarenessTemplate:Refn

manas, Script error: No such module "lang".,[5] kliṣṭamanovijñāna,[14] ༧

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: nyon-yid rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang". The eighth consciousness (which it grasps to as a self)[15] Disturbing emotion or attitude (Skt.: kleśa)Template:Refn Mind
VIII.

This Eighth Consciousness, posited on the basis of inferential cognition, is asserted, uncommonly, in Script error: No such module "lang"..[5]

VIII.

"Storehouse" or "repository" consciousness [16]Template:Refn

ālāyavijñāna,[5] Also known as the appropriating consciousness (ādānavijñāna), the basic consciousness (mūla-vijñāna), and the "mind which has all the seeds" (sarvabījakam cittam).[16] ༨

Tibetan: Template:Bo-textonly, Wylie: kun-gzhi rnam-shes

Script error: No such module "Lang".,

Script error: No such module "Lang"., Script error: No such module "Lang"., or Script error: No such module "Lang".

The surrounding world, the "receptacle" or "container" (bhājana) world [17] Reflexive awarenessTemplate:Refn Mind

Origins and development

Early Buddhist texts

The first five sense-consciousnesses along with the sixth consciousness are identified in the Suttapiṭaka, especially in the Sabbasutta,[18] Saṃyuttanikāya 35.23: Template:Quote

The early Buddhist texts speak of anusayā (Sanskrit: anuśayāḥ), the “underlying tendencies” or “latent dispositions” which keep beings caught in the circle of samsara. These potential tendencies are generally seen as unconscious processes which "lie beneath" our everyday consciousness, and according to Waldron "they represent the potential, the tendency, for cognitive and emotional afflictions (Pali: kilesā, Sanskrit: kleśāḥ) to arise".[2]

Sautrāntika and Theravāda theories

The Sautrāntika school of Buddhism, which relied closely on the sutras, developed a theory of seeds (bīja, 種子) in the mindstream (cittasaṃtāna, 心相續,[19] lit. "mind-character-continuity") to explain how karma and the latent dispositions continued throughout life and rebirth. This theory later developed into the alayavijñana view.[20]

The Theravāda theory of the bhavaṅga may also be a forerunner of the ālāyavijñana theory. Vasubandhu cites the bhavaṅgavijñāna of the Sinhalese school (Tāmraparṇīyanikāya) as a forerunner of the ālāyavijñāna. The Theravadin theory is also mentioned by Xuánzàng.[21]

Yogācāra

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The texts of the Yogācāra school gives a detailed explanation of the workings of the mind and the way it constructs the reality we experience. It is "meant to be an explanation of experience, rather than a system of ontology".Template:Sfn The theory of the ālāyavijñana and the other consciousnesses developed out of a need to work out various issues in Buddhist Abhidharma thought. According to Lambert Schmithausen, the first mention of the concept occurs in the Yogācārabhumiśāstra, which posits a basal consciousness that contains seeds for future cognitive processes.[22] It is also described in the Saṃdhinirmocanasūtra and in the Mahāyānasaṃgraha of Asaṅga.

Vasubandhu is considered to be the systematizer of Yogācāra thought.Template:Sfn Vasubandhu used the concept of the six consciousnesses, on which he elaborated in the Triṃśikaikākārikā (Treatise in Thirty Stanzas).Template:Sfn

Vijñānāni

According to the traditional interpretation, Vasubandhu states that there are eight consciousnesses (vijñānāni, singular: vijñāna):

  • Five sense-consciousnesses,
  • Mind (perception),
  • Manas (self-consciousness),Template:Sfn
  • Storehouse-consciousness.Template:Sfn

According to Kalupahana, this classification of eight consciousnesses is based on a misunderstanding of Vasubandhu's Triṃśikaikākārikā by later adherents.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Ālayavijñāna

The ālayavijñāna (Japanese: 阿頼耶識 arayashiki, Vietnamese: A-lại-da thức), or the "All-encompassing foundation consciousness",[8] forms the "base-consciousness" (mūlavijñāna) or "causal consciousness". According to the traditional interpretation, the other seven consciousnesses are "evolving" or "transforming" consciousnesses originating in this base-consciousness. The store-house consciousness accumulates all potential energy as seeds (bīja) for the mental (nāma) and physical (rūpa) manifestation of one's existence (nāmarūpa). It is the storehouse-consciousness which induces rebirth, causing the origination of a new existence.

Role

The ālayavijñāna is also described in the Saṃdhinirmocanasūtra as the "mind which has all the seeds" (sarvabījakam cittam) which enters the womb and develops based on two forms of appropriation or attachment (upādāna); to the material sense faculties, and to predispositions (vāsanāḥ) towards conceptual proliferations (prapañca).[23] The Saṃdhinirmocanasūtra also defines it in varying ways:

This consciousness is also called the appropriating consciousness ("adana-vijñana") because the body is grasped and appropriated by it.

It is also called the "alaya-vijñana" because it dwells in and attaches to this body in a common destiny ("ekayogakṣema-arthena").

It is also called mind ("citta") because it is heaped up and accumulated by [the six cognitive objects, i.e.:] visual forms, sounds, smells, flavors, tangibles and dharmas.[23]

In a seemingly innovative move, the Saṃdhinirmocanasūtra states that the alayavijñana is always active subliminally and occurs simultaneously with, "supported by and depending upon" the six sense consciousnesses.[3]

According to Asanga's Mahāyānasaṃgraha, the alayavijñana is taught by other Buddhist schools by different names. He states that the alaya is what the Mahasamghikas call the “root-consciousness” (mulavijñana), what the Mahīśāsakas call “the aggregate which lasts as long as samsara” (asaṃsārikaskandha) and what the Sthaviras call the bhavaṅga.[24]

Rebirth and purification

The store-house consciousness receives impressions from all functions of the other consciousnesses, and retains them as potential energy, bīja or "seeds", for their further manifestations and activities. Since it serves as the container for all experiential impressions it is also called the "seed consciousness" (種子識) or container consciousness.

According to Yogācāra teachings, the seeds stored in the store consciousness of sentient beings are not pure.Template:Refn

The store consciousness, while being originally immaculate in itself, contains a "mysterious mixture of purity and defilement, good and evil". Because of this mixture the transformation of consciousness from defilement to purity can take place and awakening is possible.[25]

Through the process of purification the dharma practitioner can become an Arhat, when the four defilements of the mental functionsTemplate:Refn of the manas-consciousness are purified.Template:RefnTemplate:Refn

Tathagata-garbha thought

According to the Laṅkāvatārasūtra and the schools of Chan and Zen Buddhism, the ālāyavijñāna is identical with the tathāgatagarbhaTemplate:Refn, and is fundamentally pure.[26]

The equation of ālāyavijñāna and tathāgatagarbha was contested. It was seen as "something akin to the Hindu notions of ātman (permanent, invariant self) and Script error: No such module "lang". (primordial substrative nature from which all mental, emotional and physical things evolve)." According to Dan Lusthaus, the critique led by the end of the eighth century to the rise of the logico-epistemic tradition of Yogācāra and a hybrid school combining Tathāgatagarbha thought with basic Yogācāra doctrines:[27]

Template:Quote

Transformations of consciousness

The traditional interpretation of the eight consciousnesses may be discarded on the ground of a reinterpretation of Vasubandhu's works. According to Kalupahana, instead of positing such an consciousnesses, the Triṃśikaikākārikā describes the transformations of this consciousness: Template:Quote

These transformations are threefold:Template:Sfn Template:Quote

The first transformation results in the ālāya: Template:Quote

The ālāyavijñāna therefore is not an eighth consciousness, but the resultant of the transformation of consciousness: Template:Quote

The second transformation is manana, self-consciousness or "Self-view, self-confusion, self-esteem and self-love".Template:Sfn According to the Lankavatara and later interpreters it is the seventh consciousness.Template:Sfn It is "thinking" about the various perceptions occurring in the stream of consciousness".Template:Sfn The alaya is defiled by this self-interest; Template:Quote

The third transformation is viṣayavijñapti, the "concept of the object".Template:Sfn In this transformation the concept of objects is created. By creating these concepts human beings become "susceptible to grasping after the object":Template:Sfn Template:Quote

A similar perspective is give by Walpola Rahula. According to Walpola Rahula, all the elements of the Yogācāra storehouse-consciousness are already found in the Pāli Canon.[28] He writes that the three layers of the mind (citta, manas, and vijñāna) as presented by Asaṅga are also mentioned in the Pāli Canon: Template:Quote

Understanding in Buddhism

China

File:性命圭旨 八識歸元圖.png
Eight Consciousnesses Return to the Origin 八識歸元圖, 1615 Xingming guizhi

Fǎxiàng and Huayan

According to Thomas McEvilley, although Vasubandhu had postulated numerous ālāya-vijñāna-s, a separate one for each individual person in the parakalpita,Template:Refn this multiplicity was later eliminated in the Faxiang and Huayan metaphysics.Template:Refn These schools inculcated instead the doctrine of a single universal and eternal ālaya-vijñāna. This exalted enstatement of the ālāyavijñāna is described in the Fǎxiàng as "primordial unity".[29]

Thomas McEvilley further argues that the presentation of the three natures by Vasubandhu is consistent with the Neo-platonist views of Plotinus and his universal 'One', 'Mind', and 'Soul'.[30]

Chán

A core teaching of Chan/Zen Buddhism describes the transformation of the Eight Consciousnesses into the Four Wisdoms.Template:Refn In this teaching, Buddhist practice is to turn the light of awareness around, from misconceptions regarding the nature of reality as being external, to kenshō, "directly see one's own nature".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".. Thus the Eighth Consciousness is transformed into the Great Perfect Mirror Wisdom, the Seventh Consciousness into the Equality (Universal Nature) Wisdom, the Sixth Consciousness into the Profound Observing Wisdom, and First to Fifth Consciousnesses into the All Performing (Perfection of Action) Wisdom.

Korea

The Interpenetration (通達) and Essence-Function (體用) of Wonhyo (元曉) is described in the Treatise on Awakening Mahāyāna Faith (大乘起信論, Mahāyānaśraddhotpādaśāstra, AMF in the excerpt below): Template:Quote

See also

Notes

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Definitions

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. ↑ a b Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 33.
  3. ↑ a b Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 97
  4. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. ↑ a b c d e f g h i Cite error: Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".
  6. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".Template:Cbignore
  12. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  13. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  14. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  15. ↑ Williams, Paul (2008). Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations, Routledge, p. 97.
  16. ↑ a b Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, pp 94-95.
  17. ↑ Schmithausen, Lambert (1987). Ālayavijñāna: on the origin and the early development of a central concept of Yogācāra philosophy, Part I: Text, page 89. Tokyo, International Institute for Buddhist Studies, Studia Philologica Buddhica Monograph Series IVa.
  18. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  20. ↑ Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 72-73.
  21. ↑ L. Schmithausen. Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy, Tokyo, 1987, I, 7–8
  22. ↑ Schmithausen, Lambert. Ālayavijñāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy, International Institute for Buddhist Studies (1987), pp 12-14
  23. ↑ a b Waldron, William S. How Innovative is ALAYAVIJÑANA
  24. ↑ Waldron, William S. The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-vijñana in the context of Indian Buddhist Thought. Routledge Critical Studies in Buddhism, 2003, page 131.
  25. ↑ The Lankavatara Sutra, A Mahayana Text, Suzuki's introduction at p. xxvi, available online: [1] Template:Webarchive.
  26. ↑ Peter Harvey, Consciousness Mysticism in the Discourses of the Buddha. In Karel Werner, ed., The Yogi and the Mystic. Curzon Press 1989, pages 96-97.
  27. ↑ Cite error: Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".
  28. ↑ Padmasiri De Silva, Robert Henry Thouless, Buddhist and Freudian Psychology. Third revised edition published by NUS Press, 1992 page 66.
  29. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Sources

<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Norbu, Namkhai (2001). The Precious Vase: Instructions on the Base of Santi Maha Sangha. Shang Shung Edizioni. Second revised edition. (Translated from the Tibetan, edited and annotated by Adriano Clemente with the help of the author. Translated from Italian into English by Andy Lukianowicz.)
  • Epstein, Ronald (undated). Verses Delineating the Eight Consciousnesses . A translation and explanation of the "Verses Delineating the Eight Consciousnesses by Tripitaka Master Hsuan-Tsang of the Tang Dynasty.

Further reading

  • Schmithausen, Lambert (1987). Ālayavijñāna. On the Origin and Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy. 2 vols. Studia Philologica Buddhica, Monograph Series, 4a and 4b, Tokyo.
  • Waldron, William, S. (2003). The Buddhist Unconscious: The ālāyavijñāna in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought, London, RoutledgeCurzon.

External links

Script error: No such module "Navbox".

Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Eight_Consciousnesses&oldid=4657244"