Old Testament
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Unsubst".Script error: No such module "about". Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Template:Infobox religious text Template:Bible-related Template:Christianity
The Old Testament (OT) is the first division of the Christian biblical canon. It is based primarily upon the 24 books of the Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, a collection of ancient religious Hebrew and occasionally Aramaic writings by the Israelites, but differs from the Jewish canon in order, textual tradition, and, in some Christian traditions, contents.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The second division of Christian Bibles is the New Testament, written in Koine Greek.
The Old Testament consists of many distinct books by various authors produced over a period of centuries.[1] Christians traditionally divide the Old Testament into four sections:[2] the Pentateuch or the first five books (which corresponds to the Jewish Torah); the Historical books telling the history of the Israelites, from their conquest of Canaan to their defeat and exile in Babylon; the Poetic Books, which explore themes of human experience, morality, and divine justice; and the Prophetic books, warning of the consequences of turning away from God.
The Old Testament canon differs among Christian denominations. The Catholic canon contains 46, the Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Churches include up to 49 books, and the Protestant Bible typically has 39.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Most of these books are shared across all Christian canons, corresponding to the 24 books of the Tanakh but with differences in order and text. Some books found in Christian Bibles, but not in the Hebrew canon, are called deuterocanonical books, mostly originating from the Septuagint, an ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible. Catholic and Orthodox churches include these, while most Protestant Bibles exclude them, though some Anglican and Lutheran versions place them in a separate section called Apocrypha.
Because the term "Old Testament" is used within Christianity, the same texts may be interpreted differently in Christian and Jewish traditions. Christian interpretation has often read passages of the Old Testament in light of the New Testament, while Jewish interpretation does not treat these writings as part of an "old" covenant superseded by a New Testament.
While early histories of the ancient Israel and Judah were largely based on biblical accounts, their reliability has been increasingly questioned over time. Key debates have focused on the historicity of the Patriarchs, the Exodus, the Israelite conquest, and the United Monarchy, with archaeological evidence often challenging these narratives. Mainstream scholarship generally takes a skeptical but balanced approach to historical material from the 9th century BC onward; some chronologically later biblical traditions align with archaeological findings.[3]
Content
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
The Old Testament contains 39 (Protestant), 46 (Catholic), or more (Orthodox and other) books, divided, very broadly, into the Pentateuch (Torah), the historical books, the "wisdom" books and the prophets.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
The table reflects Christian canonical arrangements of these texts; the Jewish Tanakh uses a different order and does not include the deuterocanonical books recognized in Catholic and Orthodox Old Testaments. The table below uses the spellings and names present in modern editions of the Christian Bible, such as the Catholic New American Bible Revised Edition and the Protestant Revised Standard Version and English Standard Version. The spelling and names in both the 1609–10 Douay Old Testament (and in the 1582 Rheims New Testament) and the 1749 revision by Bishop Challoner (the edition currently in print used by many Catholics, and the source of traditional Catholic spellings in English) and in the Septuagint differ from those spellings and names used in modern editions which are derived from the Hebrew Masoretic Text.Template:Efn
For the Orthodox canon, Septuagint titles are provided in parentheses when these differ from those editions. For the Catholic canon, the Douaic titles are provided in parentheses when these differ from those editions. Likewise, the King James Version references some of these books by the traditional spelling when referring to them in the New Testament, such as "Esaias" (for Isaiah).
In the spirit of ecumenism, more recent Catholic translations (e.g. the New American Bible, Jerusalem Bible, and ecumenical translations used by Catholics, such as the Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition) use the same "standardized" (King James Version) spellings and names as Protestant Bibles (e.g. 1 Chronicles as opposed to the Douaic 1 Paralipomenon, 1–2 Samuel and 1–2 Kings instead of 1–4 Kings) in those books which are universally considered canonical: the protocanonicals.
The Talmud (the Jewish commentary on the scriptures) in Bava Batra 14b gives a different order for the books in Nevi'im and Ketuvim. This order is also cited in Mishneh Torah Hilchot Sefer Torah 7:15.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". The order of the books of the Torah is universal through all denominations of Judaism and Christianity.
The disputed books, included in most canons but not in others, are often called the Biblical apocrypha, a term that is sometimes used specifically to describe the books in the Catholic and Orthodox canons that are absent from the Jewish Masoretic Text and most modern Protestant Bibles. Catholics, following the Canon of Trent (1546), describe these books as deuterocanonical, while Greek Orthodox Christians, following the Synod of Jerusalem (1672), use the traditional name of Script error: No such module "lang"., meaning "that which is to be read." They are present in a few historic Protestant versions; the German Luther Bible included such books, as did the English 1611 King James Version.Template:Efn
Empty table cells indicate that a book is absent from that canon.
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
Template:Sticky headerTemplate:Sort under
Several of the books in the Eastern Orthodox canon are also found in the appendix to the Latin Vulgate, formerly the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church.
| Books in the appendix to the Vulgate Bible | |
| Name in Vulgate | Name in Eastern Orthodox use |
|---|---|
| 3 Esdras | 1 Esdras |
| 4 Esdras | 2 Esdras |
| Prayer of Manasseh | Prayer of Manasseh |
| Psalm of David when he slew Goliath (Psalm 151) | Psalm 151 |
Historicity
Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote".
Early scholarship
Some of the stories of the Pentateuch may derive from older sources. Scholars such as Andrew R. George point out the similarity between the Genesis flood narrative and the Gilgamesh flood myth.[5]Template:Efn Similarities between the origin story of Moses and that of Sargon of Akkad were noted by psychoanalyst Otto Rank in 1909[6] and popularized by 20th-century writers, such as H. G. Wells and Joseph Campbell.[7][8] Jacob Bronowski writes that "the Bible is ... part folklore and part record. History is ... written by the victors, and the Israelis, when they burst through [Jericho (c. 1400 BCScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".)], became the carriers of history."[9]
Recent scholarship
In 2007, a historian of ancient Judaism Lester L. Grabbe explained that earlier biblical scholars such as Julius Wellhausen (1844–1918) could be described as 'maximalist', accepting biblical text unless it has been disproven. Continuing in this tradition, both "the 'substantial historicity' of the patriarchs" and "the unified conquest of the land" were widely accepted in the United States until about the 1970s. Contrarily, Grabbe says that those in his field now "are all minimalistsTemplate:Sndat least, when it comes to the patriarchal period and the settlement. ... [V]ery few are willing to operate [as maximalists]."[10]
In 2022, archaeologist Avraham Faust summarized recent scholarship arguing that while early histories of Israel were heavily based on biblical accounts, their reliability has been increasingly questioned over time. He continued that key debates have focused on the historicity of the Patriarchs, the Exodus, the Israelite conquest, and the United Monarchy, with archaeological evidence often challenging these narratives. He concluded that while the minimalist school of the 1990s dismissed the Bible's historical value more or less entirely, mainstream scholarship since then has taken a more balanced approach, recognizing that some biblical traditions align with archaeological findings, particularly from the 9th century BC onward.[11]
Composition
Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". The first five books—Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy—reached their present form in the Persian period (538–332 BC), and their authors were the elite of exilic returnees who controlled the Temple at that time.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The books of Joshua, Judges, Ruth, Samuel and Kings follow, forming a history of Israel from the Conquest of Canaan to the Siege of Jerusalem c. 587Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". BC. There is a broad consensus among scholars that these originated as a single work (the so-called "Deuteronomistic History") during the Babylonian exile of the 6th century BC.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
The two Books of Chronicles cover much the same material as the Pentateuch and Deuteronomistic history and probably date from the 4th century BC.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Chronicles and Ezra–Nehemiah were probably finished during the 3rd century BC.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Catholic and Orthodox Old Testaments contain two (Catholic Old Testament) to four (Orthodox) Books of the Maccabees, written in the 2nd and 1st centuries BC. Certain Israeli scholars maintain that this passage in the Book of Chronicles was originally composed in Hebrew, arguing that the choice of language reflects the author's intention to preserve and promote Jewish religious identity, scriptural tradition, and national memory within the post-exilic community.Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
These history books make up around half the total content of the Old Testament. Of the remainder, the books of the various prophets—Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the twelve "minor prophets"—were written between the 8th and 6th centuries BC, with the exceptions of Jonah and Daniel, which were written much later.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The "wisdom" books—Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Psalms, Song of Songs—have various dates: Proverbs possibly was completed by the Hellenistic time (332–198 BC), though containing much older material as well; Job was completed by the 6th century BC; Ecclesiastes by the 3rd century BC.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Themes
Throughout the Old Testament, God is consistently depicted as the one who created the world. Although the God of the Old Testament is not consistently presented as the only god who exists, he is always depicted as the only God whom Israel is to worship, or the one "true God", that only Yahweh (or <templatestyles src="smallcaps/styles.css"/>YHWH) is Almighty.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
The Old Testament stresses the special relationship between God and his chosen people, Israel, but includes instructions for proselytes as well. This relationship is expressed in the biblical covenant (contract)Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". between the two, received by Moses. The law codes in books such as Exodus and especially Deuteronomy are the terms of the contract: Israel swears faithfulness to God, and God swears to be Israel's special protector and supporter.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". However, The Jewish Study Bible denies that the word covenant (Script error: No such module "lang". in Hebrew) means "contract"; in the ancient Near East, a covenant would have been sworn before the gods, who would be its enforcers. As God is part of the agreement, and not merely witnessing it, The Jewish Study Bible instead interprets the term to refer to a pledge.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Further themes in the Old Testament include salvation, redemption, divine judgment, obedience and disobedience, faith and faithfulness, among others. Throughout there is a strong emphasis on ethics and ritual purity, both of which God demands, although some of the prophets and wisdom writers seem to question this, arguing that God demands social justice above purity, and perhaps does not even care about purity at all. The Old Testament's moral code enjoins fairness, intervention on behalf of the vulnerable, and the duty of those in power to administer justice righteously. It forbids murder, bribery and corruption, deceitful trading, and many sexual misdemeanours. All morality is traced back to God, who is the source of all goodness.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
The problem of evil plays a large part in the Old Testament. The problem the Old Testament authors faced was that a good God must have had just reason for bringing disaster (meaning notably, but not only, the Babylonian exile) upon his people. The theme is played out, with many variations, in books as different as the histories of Kings and Chronicles, the prophets like Ezekiel and Jeremiah, and in the wisdom books like Job and Ecclesiastes.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Formation
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
The process by which scriptures became canons and Bibles was a long one, and its complexities account for the many different Old Testaments which exist today. Timothy H. Lim, a professor of Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Judaism at the University of Edinburgh, identifies the Old Testament as "a collection of authoritative texts of apparently divine origin that went through a human process of writing and editing."[1] He states that it is not a magical book, nor was it literally written by God and passed to mankind. By about the 5th century BC, Jews saw the five books of the Torah (the Old Testament Pentateuch) as having authoritative status; by the 2nd century BC, the Prophets had a similar status, although without quite the same level of respect as the Torah.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Greek
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Hebrew texts began to be translated into Greek in Alexandria in about 280 BC and continued until about 130 BC.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". These early Greek translations Template:Ndash supposedly commissioned by Ptolemy II Philadelphus Template:Ndash were called the Template:Langnf from the supposed number of translators involved (hence its abbreviation "LXX"). This Septuagint remains the basis of the Old Testament in the Eastern Orthodox Church.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
It varies in many places from the Masoretic Text and includes numerous books no longer considered canonical in some traditions: 1 Esdras, Judith, Tobit, the books of Maccabees, the Book of Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Early modern biblical criticism typically explained these variations as intentional or ignorant corruptions by the Alexandrian scholars, but most recent scholarship holds it is simply based on early source texts differing from those later used by the Masoretes in their work.
The Septuagint was originally used by Hellenized Jews whose knowledge of Greek was better than Hebrew. However, the texts came to be used predominantly by gentile converts to Christianity and by the early Church as its scripture, Greek being the lingua franca of the early Church. As a result, Greek renderings of Hebrew terms and passages influenced later Christian interpretation of the Old Testament. The three most acclaimed early interpreters were Aquila of Sinope, Symmachus the Ebionite, and Theodotion; in his Hexapla, Origen placed his edition of the Hebrew text beside its transcription in Greek letters and four parallel translations: Aquila's, Symmachus's, the Septuagint's, and Theodotion's. The so-called "fifth" and "sixth editions" were two other Greek translations supposedly miraculously discovered by students outside the towns of Jericho and Nicopolis: these were added to Origen's Octapla.[12]
In 331, Constantine I commissioned Eusebius to deliver fifty Bibles for the Church of Constantinople. Athanasius[13] recorded Alexandrian scribes around 340 preparing Bibles for Constans. Little else is known, though there is plenty of speculation. For example, it is speculatedScript error: No such module "Unsubst". that this may have provided motivation for canon lists and that Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus are examples of these BiblesScript error: No such module "Unsubst".. Together with the Peshitta and Codex Alexandrinus, these are the earliest extant Christian Bibles.[14] There is no evidence among the canons of the First Council of Nicaea of any determination on the canon. However, Jerome (347–420), in his Prologue to Judith, claims that the Book of Judith was "found by the Nicene Council to have been counted among the number of the Sacred Scriptures".[15]
Latin
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In Western Christianity or Christianity in the Western half of the Roman Empire, Latin had displaced Greek as the common language of the early Christians, and in 382 AD Pope Damasus I commissioned Jerome, the leading scholar of the day, to produce an updated Latin Bible to replace the Vetus Latina, which was a Latin translation of the Septuagint. Jerome's work, called the Vulgate, was a direct translation from Hebrew, since he argued for the superiority of the Hebrew texts in correcting the Septuagint on both philological and theological grounds.[16] His Vulgate Old Testament became the standard Bible used in the Western Church, specifically as the Sixto-Clementine Vulgate, while the Churches in the East continued, and continue, to use the Septuagint.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Jerome, however, in the Vulgate's prologues, describes some portions of books in the Septuagint not found in the Hebrew Bible as being non-canonical (he called them apocrypha);[17] for Baruch, he mentions by name in his Prologue to Jeremiah and notes that it is neither read nor held among the Hebrews, but does not explicitly call it apocryphal or "not in the canon".[18] The Synod of Hippo (in 393), followed by the Council of Carthage (397) and the Council of Carthage (419), may be the first council that explicitly accepted the first canon which includes the books that did not appear in the Hebrew Bible;[19] the councils were under significant influence of Augustine of Hippo, who regarded the canon as already closed.[20]
Protestant canon
In the 16th century, the Protestant reformers sided with Jerome; yet although most Protestant Bibles now have only those books that appear in the Hebrew Bible, the order is that of the Greek Bible.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Rome then officially adopted a canon, the Canon of Trent, which is seen as following Augustine's Carthaginian Councils[21] or the Council of Rome,[22][23] and includes most, but not all, of the Septuagint (3 Ezra and 3 and 4 Maccabees are excluded);Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". the Anglicans after the English Civil War adopted a compromise position, restoring the 39 Articles and keeping the extra books that were excluded by the Westminster Confession of Faith, both for private study and for reading in churches but not for establishing any doctrine, while Lutherans kept them for private study, gathered in an appendix as biblical apocrypha.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Other versions
While the Hebrew, Greek and Latin versions of the Hebrew Bible are the best known Old Testaments, there were others. At much the same time as the Septuagint was being produced, translations were being made into Aramaic, the language of Jews living in Palestine and the Near East and likely the language of Jesus: these are called the Aramaic Targums, from a word meaning "translation", and were used to help Jewish congregations understand their scriptures.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
For Aramaic Christians, there was a Syriac translation of the Hebrew Bible called the Peshitta, as well as versions in Coptic (the everyday language of Egypt in the first Christian centuries, descended from ancient Egyptian), Ethiopic (for use in the Ethiopian church, one of the oldest Christian churches), Armenian (Armenia was the first to adopt Christianity as its official religion), and Arabic.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Christian theology
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Christian interpretation refers to the "Old Testament" as such only because there is a "New Testament" to which it relates; the designation is therefore a Christian theological category rather than a Jewish one. The name "Old Testament" reflects Christianity's understanding of itself as the fulfillment of Jeremiah's prophecy of a New Covenant (which is similar to "testament" and often conflated) to replace the preceding covenant between God and Israel (Jeremiah 31:31).[24]Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The emphasis, however, has shifted from Judaism's understanding of the covenant as a racially or tribally based pledge between God and the Jewish people, to one between God and any person of faith who is "in Christ".Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Relating the Old and New Testaments, the Second Vatican Council outlines a Catholic theology wherein "God, the inspirer and author of both Testaments, wisely arranged that the New Testament be hidden in the Old and the Old be made manifest in the New".[25] Dennis Hamm sees the Council's teaching as a counter to the "perennial temptation ... to dismiss the Old Testament as irrelevant for Christians".[26]
Christianity draws from its belief that the historical Jesus is also the Christ, as in the Confession of Peter. This belief is in turn based on Jewish understandings of the meaning of the Hebrew term Messiah, which, like the Greek "Christ", means "anointed". The Hebrew Scriptures describes a king anointed with oil on his accession to the throne: he becomes "The LORD's anointed" or Yahweh's Anointed.
By the time of Jesus, some Jews expected that a flesh-and-blood descendant of David (the "Son of David") would come to establish a real Jewish kingdom in Jerusalem, instead of the Roman province of Judaea.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Others stressed the Son of Man, a distinctly other-worldly figure who would appear as a judge at the end of time. Some expounded a synthesised view of both positions, where a messianic kingdom of this world would last for a set period and be followed by the other-worldly age or World to Come.
SomeScript error: No such module "Unsubst". thought the Messiah was already present, but unrecognised due to Israel's sins; someScript error: No such module "Unsubst". thought that the Messiah would be announced by a forerunner, probably Elijah (as promised by the prophet Malachi, whose book now ends the Old Testament and precedes Mark's account of John the Baptist). Later parts of the Old Testament expect a descendant of David who will establish an ideal reign of peace, prosperity and righteousness.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The story of Jesus' death, therefore, involved a profound shift in meaning from the Old Testament tradition.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
See also
- New Testament
- Biblical and Quranic narratives
- List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts
- Expounding of the Law
- Genealogies of Genesis
- Law and Gospel
- List of ancient legal codes
- Non-canonical books referenced in the Bible
- Quotations from the Hebrew Bible in the New Testament
Explanatory notes
Citations
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "template wrapper".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Cave, William. A complete history of the lives, acts, and martyrdoms of the holy apostles, and the two evangelists, St. Mark and Luke, Vol. II. Wiatt (Philadelphia), 1810. Retrieved 2013-02-06.
- ↑ Apol. Const. 4
- ↑ The Canon Debate, pp. 414–15, for the entire paragraph
- ↑ Script error: No such module "template wrapper". Canonicity: "..." the Synod of Nicaea is said to have accounted it as Sacred Scripture" (Praef. in Lib.). No such declaration indeed is to be found in the Canons of Nicaea, and it is uncertain whether St. Jerome is referring to the use made of the book in the discussions of the council, or whether he was misled by some spurious canons attributed to that council".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ McDonald & Sanders, editors of The Canon Debate, 2002, chapter 5: The Septuagint: The Bible of Hellenistic Judaism by Albert C. Sundberg Jr., page 72, Appendix D-2, note 19.
- ↑ Everett Ferguson, "Factors leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon", in The Canon Debate. eds. L. M. McDonald & J. A. Sanders (Hendrickson, 2002) p. 320; F. F. Bruce, The Canon of Scripture (Intervarsity Press, 1988) p. 230; cf. Augustine, De Civitate Dei 22.8
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
- ↑ Holy See, Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation, Dei Verbum, paragraph 16, published on 18 November 1965, accessed on 9 September 2025
- ↑ Hamm, Dennis SJ (2014), DEI VERBUM: Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation (Vatican II, 1965): An orientation and quick review by way of questions and answers, Creighton University, page9, accessed on 9 October 2025
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
General and cited references
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- biblicc6. (2021, November 3). Shabbat Lectures on the Torah: SELF ESTEEM. Biblical Research Institute. https://biblicalresearchinstitute.com/shabbat-lectures-on-the-torah-self-esteem/
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Early Judaism, part 1 (video). (n.d.). Khan Academy. Retrieved November 20, 2025, from https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/world-history/ancient-medieval/judaism/v/overview-of-early-judaism-part-1
- Emerton, J. A. (1984). [Review of Review of Reading the Old Testament: Method in Biblical Study, by J. Barton]. Vetus Testamentum, 34(3), 370–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/1518027
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Jeon, J., & Jonker, L. C. (Eds.). (2021). Chronicles and the Priestly Literature of the Hebrew Bible. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110707014
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Further reading
- Anderson, Bernhard. Understanding the Old Testament. Template:ISBN
- Bahnsen, Greg, et al., Five Views on Law and Gospel (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1993).
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "template wrapper".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (hardback), Template:ISBN (paperback).
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". (clothbound) and Template:ISBN (paperback).
External links
Script error: No such module "Sister project links".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".. Full texts of the Old (and New) Testaments including the full Roman and Orthodox Catholic canons
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". – Tanakh
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Protestant Old Testament on a single page
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".. Extensive online Old Testament resources (including commentaries)
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".: Old Testament stories and commentary
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". – Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia and the King James Version
Template:The Bible
Script error: No such module "navbox".
Script error: No such module "Navbox".
Script error: No such module "Navbox".
Script error: No such module "Navbox".
Script error: No such module "Navbox".
Script error: No such module "Authority control".
Cite error: Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".
- Pages with script errors
- Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with Wikisource reference
- Articles incorporating a citation from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with Wikisource reference
- Pages with broken file links
- Old Testament
- Christian terminology
- Pages with reference errors