Human Development Index

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Script error: No such module "For". Template:Pp-pc Template:Use dmy dates

World map of Countries scored by HDI
World map of countries or territories by HDI scores in increments of 0.050 (based on 2023 data, published in 2025) Template:Legend-col

The Human Development Index (HDI) is a statistical composite index of life expectancy, education (mean years of schooling completed and expected years of schooling upon entering the education system), and per capita income indicators, which is used to rank countries into four tiers of human development. A country scores a higher level of HDI when the lifespan is higher, the education level is higher, and the gross national income GNI (PPP) per capita is higher. It was developed by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul-Haq and Amartya Sen, and was further used to measure a country's development by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)'s Human Development Report Office.[1][2][3][4]

The 2010 Human Development Report introduced an inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI). While the simple HDI remains useful, it stated that "the IHDI is the actual level of human development (accounting for this inequality), while the HDI can be viewed as an index of 'potential' human development (or the maximum level of HDI) that could be achieved if there was no inequality."[5]

The index is based on the human development approach, developed by Mahbub ul-Haq, anchored in Amartya Sen's work on human capabilities, and often framed in terms of whether people are able to "be" and "do" desirable things in life. Examples include — being: well-fed, sheltered, and healthy; doing: work, education, voting, participating in community life. The freedom of choice is considered central — someone choosing to be hungry (e.g. when fasting for religious reasons) is considered different from someone who is hungry because they cannot afford to buy food, or because the country is going through a famine.[6]

The index does not take into account several factors, such as the net wealth per capita or the relative quality of goods in a country. This situation tends to lower the ranking of some of the most developed countries, such as the G7 members and others.[7]

Origins

The origins of the HDI are found in the annual Human Development Reports produced by the Human Development Report Office of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). These annual reports were devised and launched by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul-Haq in 1990, and had the explicit purpose "to shift the focus of development economics from national income accounting to people-centered policies". He believed that a simple composite measure of human development was needed to convince the public, academics and politicians that they can, and should, evaluate development not only by economic advances but also improvements in human well-being.

File:Human Development Index Underlying Principles.svg
The underlying principle behind the Human Development Index[6]

Template:Break

Dimensions and calculation

New method (2010 HDI onwards)

File:Human Development Index regions evolution 1990-2021-fr.svg
HDI trends between 1990 and 2021
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
  World
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
  OECD countries
Developing countries: <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" /> <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
  East Asia and the Pacific
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" /> <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" /> <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" /> <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />

Published on 4 November 2010 (and updated on 10 June 2011), the 2010 Human Development Report calculated the HDI combining three dimensions:[8][9]

In its 2010 Human Development Report, the UNDP began using a new method of calculating the HDI. The following three indices are used:

1.Script error: No such module "anchor". Life Expectancy Index (LEI) =LE208520=LE2065

LEI is equal to 1 when life expectancy at birth is 85 years, and 0 when life expectancy at birth is 20 years.

2. Education Index (EI) =MYSI+EYSI2[10]

2.1 Mean Years of Schooling Index (MYSI) =MYS15[11]
Fifteen is the projected maximum of this indicator for 2025.
2.2 Expected Years of Schooling Index (EYSI) =EYS18[12]
Eighteen is equivalent to achieving a master's degree in most countries.

3. Income Index (II) =ln(GNIpc)ln(100)ln(75,000)ln(100)=ln(GNIpc)ln(100)ln(750)

II is 1 when GNI per capita is $75,000 and 0 when GNI per capita is $100.

Finally, the HDI is the geometric mean of the previous three normalized indices:

HDI=LEIEIII3.

LE: Life expectancy at birth
MYS: Mean years of schooling (i.e. years that a person aged 25 or older has spent in formal education)
EYS: Expected years of schooling (i.e. total expected years of schooling for children under 18 years of age, incl. young men and women aged 13–17)
GNIpc: Gross national income at purchasing power parity per capita
Template:Break

Old method (HDI before 2010)

The HDI combined three dimensions last used in its 2009 report:

File:Human Development Index trends.svg
HDI trends between 1975 and 2004
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
  OECD
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
  Europe (not in the OECD), and CIS
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" /> <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />
<templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" /> <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" /> <templatestyles src="Legend/styles.css" />

This methodology was used by the UNDP until their 2011 report.

The formula defining the HDI is promulgated by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).[13] In general, to transform a raw variable, say x, into a unit-free index between 0 and 1 (which allows different indices to be added together), the following formula is used:

  • x index=xaba

where a and b are the lowest and highest values the variable x can attain, respectively.

The Human Development Index (HDI) then represents the uniformly weighted sum with <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />13 contributed by each of the following factor indices:

Template:Break

2023 Human Development Index (2025 report)

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

World map
Average annual HDI growth from 2010 to 2023 (published in 2025)Template:Legend-col

The Human Development Report 2025 by the United Nations Development Programme was released on 6 May 2025; the report calculates HDI values based on data collected in 2023.

Ranked from 1 to 74 in the year 2023, the following countries are considered to be of "very high human development":[14]

Template:Sronly
Rank Country or territory HDI
2023 data (2025 report)Template:Zero width space Change since 2015Template:Zero width space 2023 data (2025 report)Template:Zero width space[15] Average annual growth (2010–2023)Template:Zero width space
1 Template:Sort Template:Country data Iceland 0.972 Template:Sort
2 Template:Sort Template:Country data Norway 0.970 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Switzerland Template:Sort
4 Template:Sort Template:Country data Denmark 0.962 Template:Sort
5 Template:Sort Template:Country data Germany 0.959 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Sweden Template:Sort
7 Template:Sort Template:Country data Australia 0.958 Template:Sort
8 Template:Sort Template:Country data Netherlands 0.955 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Hong Kong Template:Sort
10 Template:Sort Template:Country data Belgium 0.951 Template:Sort
11 Template:Sort Template:Country data Ireland 0.949 Template:Sort
12 Template:Sort Template:Country data Finland 0.948 Template:Sort
13 Template:Sort Template:Country data Singapore 0.946 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data United Kingdom Template:Sort
15 Template:Sort Template:Country data United Arab Emirates 0.940 Template:Sort
16 Template:Sort Template:Country data Canada 0.939 Template:Sort
17 Template:Sort Template:Country data Liechtenstein 0.938 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data New Zealand Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data United States Template:Sort
20 Template:Sort Template:Country data South Korea 0.937 Template:Sort
21 Template:Sort Template:Country data Slovenia 0.931 Template:Sort
22 Template:Sort Template:Country data Austria 0.930 Template:Sort
23 Template:Sort Template:Country data Japan 0.925 Template:Sort
24 Template:Sort Template:Country data Malta 0.924 Template:Sort
25 Template:Sort Template:Country data Luxembourg 0.922 Template:Sort
26 Template:Sort Template:Country data France 0.920 Template:Sort
27 Template:Sort Template:Country data Israel 0.919 Template:Sort
28 Template:Sort Template:Country data Spain 0.918 Template:Sort
29 Template:Sort Template:Country data Czechia 0.915 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Italy Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data San Marino Template:Sort
32 Template:Sort Template:Country data Andorra 0.913 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Cyprus Template:Sort
34 Template:Sort Template:Country data Greece 0.908 Template:Sort
35 Template:Sort Template:Country data Poland 0.906 Template:Sort
36 Template:Sort Template:Country data Estonia 0.905 Template:Sort
37 Template:Sort Template:Country data Saudi Arabia 0.900 Template:Sort
38 Template:Sort Template:Country data Bahrain 0.899 Template:Sort
39 Template:Sort Template:Country data Lithuania 0.895 Template:Sort
40 Template:Sort Template:Country data Portugal 0.890 Template:Sort
41 Template:Sort Template:Country data Croatia 0.889 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Latvia Template:Sort
43 Template:Sort Template:Country data Qatar 0.886 Template:Sort
44 Template:Sort Template:Country data Slovakia 0.880 Template:Sort
45 Template:Sort Template:Country data Chile 0.878 Template:Sort
46 Template:Sort Template:Country data Hungary 0.870 Template:Sort
47 Template:Sort Template:Country data Argentina 0.865 Template:Sort
48 Template:Sort Template:Country data Montenegro 0.862 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Uruguay Template:Sort
50 Template:Sort Template:Country data Oman 0.858 Template:Sort
51 Template:Sort Template:Country data Turkey 0.853 Template:Sort
52 Template:Sort Template:Country data Kuwait 0.852 Template:Sort
53 Template:Sort Template:Country data Antigua and Barbuda 0.851 Template:Sort
54 Template:Sort Template:Country data Seychelles 0.848 Template:Sort
55 Template:Sort Template:Country data Bulgaria 0.845 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Romania Template:Sort
57 Template:Sort Template:Country data Georgia 0.844 Template:Sort
58 Template:Sort Template:Country data Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.840 Template:Sort
59 Template:Sort Template:Country data Panama 0.839 Template:Sort
60 Template:Sort Template:Country data Brunei 0.837 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Kazakhstan Template:Sort
62 Template:Sort Template:Country data Costa Rica 0.833 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Serbia Template:Sort
64 Template:Sort Template:Country data Russia 0.832 Template:Sort
65 Template:Sort Template:Country data Belarus 0.824 Template:Sort
66 Template:Sort Template:Country data Bahamas 0.820 Template:Sort
67 Template:Sort Template:Country data Malaysia 0.819 Template:Sort
68 Template:Sort Template:Country data North Macedonia 0.815 Template:Sort
69 Template:Sort Template:Country data Barbados 0.811 Template:Sort
Template:Sort Template:Country data Armenia Template:Sort
71 Template:Sort Template:Country data Albania 0.810 Template:Sort
72 Template:Sort Template:Country data Trinidad and Tobago 0.807 Template:Sort
73 Template:Sort Template:Country data Mauritius 0.806 Template:Sort
74 Template:Sort Template:Country data Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.804 Template:Sort

Past top countries

The list below displays the top-ranked country from each year of the Human Development Index. Norway has been ranked the highest sixteen times, Canada eight times, and Switzerland, Japan, and Iceland have each ranked twice.

In each original HDI

The year represents the time period from which the statistics for the index were derived. In parentheses is the year when the report was published. Template:Columns-list Template:Break

Geographical coverage

The HDI has extended its geographical coverage: David Hastings, of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, published a report geographically extending the HDI to 230+ economies, whereas the UNDP HDI for 2009 enumerates 182 economies and coverage for the 2010 HDI dropped to 169 countries.[16][17]

Country/region specific HDI lists

Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

Criticism

File:Per-capita-co-emissions-vs-human-development-index.svg
HDI in relation to consumption-based Template:Chem2 emissions per capita

The Human Development Index has been criticized on a number of grounds, including focusing exclusively on national performance and ranking, lack of attention to development from a global perspective, measurement error of the underlying statistics, and on the UNDP's changes in formula which can lead to severe misclassification of "low", "medium", "high" or "very high" human development countries.[18]

There have also been various criticism towards the lack of consideration regarding sustainability[19] (which later got addressed by the planetary pressures-adjusted HDI), social inequality[20] (which got addressed by the inequality-adjusted HDI), unemployment[21] or democracy.[21]

Sources of data error

Economists Hendrik Wolff, Howard Chong and Maximilian Auffhammer discuss the HDI from the perspective of data error in the underlying health, education and income statistics used to construct the HDI. They have identified three sources of data error which are: (i) data updating, (ii) formula revisions and (iii) thresholds to classify a country's development status. They conclude that 11%, 21% and 34% of all countries can be interpreted as currently misclassified in the development bins due to the three sources of data error, respectively. Wolff, Chong and Auffhammer suggest that the United Nations should discontinue the practice of classifying countries into development bins because the cut-off values seem arbitrary, and the classifications can provide incentives for strategic behavior in reporting official statistics, as well as having the potential to misguide politicians, investors, charity donors and the public who use the HDI at large.[18]

In 2010, the UNDP reacted to the criticism by updating the thresholds to classify nations as low, medium, and high human development countries. In a comment to The Economist in early January 2011, the Human Development Report Office responded[22] to an article published in the magazine on 6 January 2011[23] which discusses the Wolff et al. paper. The Human Development Report Office states that they undertook a systematic revision of the methods used for the calculation of the HDI, and that the new methodology directly addresses the critique by Wolff et al. in that it generates a system for continuously updating the human-development categories whenever formula or data revisions take place.

In 2013, Salvatore Monni and Alessandro Spaventa emphasized that in the debate of GDP versus HDI, it is often forgotten that these are both external indicators that prioritize different benchmarks upon which the quantification of societal welfare can be predicated. The larger question is whether it is possible to shift the focus of policy from a battle between competing paradigms to a mechanism for eliciting information on well-being directly from the population.[24]

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Sister project

Template:Global economic classifications Template:Population country lists Template:Quality of life country lists Template:Deprivation Indicators Template:Authority control

sah:HDI

  1. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Mean years of schooling (of adults) (years) is a calculation of the average number of years of education received by people ages 25 and older in their lifetime based on education attainment levels of the population converted into years of schooling based on theoretical duration of each level of education attended. Source: Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. (ESYI is a calculation of the number of years a child is expected to attend school, or university, including the years spent on repetition. It is the sum of the age-specific enrollment ratios for primary, secondary, post-secondary non-tertiary and tertiary education and is calculated assuming the prevailing patterns of age-specific enrollment rates were to stay the same throughout the child's life. Expected years of schooling is capped at 18 years. (Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2010). Correspondence on education indicators. March. Montreal.)
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Information Note linked to data
  18. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  21. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".