Writing: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Remsense
 
imported>Remsense
m Disambiguate Keyboard to Input method using popups
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=April 2025}}
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=April 2025}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2025}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2025}}
[[File:Rosetta Stone.JPG|thumb|upright=1.3|The [[Rosetta Stone]] (196 BC) bears writing in three different scripts: [[hieroglyphs]] (top) and [[Demotic script|Demotic]] (middle) record the same text in the [[Egyptian language]], while an equivalent passage in [[Greek language|Greek]] uses the [[Greek alphabet]] (bottom). These correspondences were key to the [[decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs]] in the early 19th century.]]
[[File:Rosetta Stone.JPG|thumb|upright=1.3|The [[Rosetta Stone]] (196 BC) bears writing in three different scripts. [[Hieroglyphs]] (top) and [[Demotic script|Demotic]] (middle) record the same text in the [[Egyptian language]], while an equivalent passage in [[Greek language|Greek]] uses the [[Greek alphabet]] (bottom). These correspondences were key to the [[decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs]] in the early 19th century.]]


'''Writing''' is the act of creating a persistent representation of [[language]]. A [[writing system]] includes a particular set of symbols called a ''script'', as well as the rules by which they encode a particular spoken language. Every [[written language]] arises from a corresponding spoken language; while the use of language is universal across human societies, most spoken languages are not written.{{sfnp|Harris|2000|p=185}}
'''Writing''' is the act of creating a persistent representation of [[language]]. A [[writing system]] includes a particular set of symbols called a ''script'', as well as the rules by which they encode a particular spoken language. Every [[written language]] arises from a corresponding spoken language; while the use of language is universal across human societies, most spoken languages are not written.{{sfnp|Harris|2000|p=185}}
Line 13: Line 13:


== Tools, materials, and motivations to write ==
== Tools, materials, and motivations to write ==
Any instance of writing involves a complex interaction among available tools, intentions, cultural customs, cognitive routines, genres, tacit and explicit knowledge, and the constraints and limitations of the systems used.{{sfnp|Jakobs|Perrin|2014|p=8}} Inscriptions have been made with [[finger]]s, [[stylus]]es, [[quill]]s, [[ink brush]]es, [[pencil]]s, [[pen]]s, and many styles of [[lithography]]; surfaces used for these inscriptions include [[stone tablet]]s, [[clay tablet]]s, bamboo slats, [[papyrus]], [[wax tablet]]s, [[vellum]], [[parchment]], [[paper]], [[intaglio printing|copperplate]], [[Blackboard|slate]], [[porcelain]], and other [[Whiteboard|enameled surfaces]].
Any instance of writing involves a complex interaction among available tools, intentions, cultural customs, cognitive routines, genres, tacit and explicit knowledge, and the constraints and limitations of the systems used.{{sfnp|Jakobs|Perrin|2014a|p=8}} [[Writing implement]]s used to make physical inscriptions include [[finger]]s, [[stylus]]es, [[ink brush]]es, [[pencil]]s, [[pen]]s, and many styles of [[lithography]]; [[writing surface]]s on which inscriptions may be made include [[stone tablet]]s, [[clay tablet]]s, [[bamboo slips]], [[papyrus]], [[wax tablet]]s, [[vellum]], [[parchment]], [[paper]], [[intaglio printing|copperplate]], and [[Blackboard|slate]].{{sfnpm|1a1=Mahlow|1a2=Dale|1y=2014|1pp=209–210|2a1=Condorelli|2y=2022|2pp=39–49}}


The [[typewriter]] and subsequently various digital [[word processor]]s have recently become widespread writing tools, and studies have compared the ways in which [[writer]]s have framed the experience of writing with such tools as compared with the pen or pencil.{{sfnp|Lindgren|Sullivan|2019}}
The [[typewriter]], as well as the digital [[word processor]], allow individual writers to produce visually consistent text mechanically via a [[Input method|keyboard]].{{sfnp|Lindgren|Sullivan|2019}}
 
Advancements in [[natural language processing]] and [[natural language generation]] have resulted in software capable of  producing certain forms of formulaic writing (e.g., weather forecasts and brief sports reporting) without the direct involvement of humans{{sfnp|Reiter|Dale|2000}} after initial configuration or, more commonly, to be used to support writing processes such as generating initial drafts, producing feedback with the help of a rubric, copy-editing, and [[machine translation|helping translation]].{{sfnp|Katsnelson|2022|pp=208–209}}
 
Writing technologies from different eras coexist easily in many homes and workplaces. During the course of a day or even a single episode of writing, for example, a writer might instinctively switch among a pencil, a touchscreen, a text-editor, a whiteboard, a legal pad, and adhesive notes as different purposes arise.{{sfnp|O'Hara|Taylor|Newman|Sellen|2002|pp=269–305}}


Advancements in [[natural language processing]] and [[natural language generation]] have resulted in software capable of  producing certain forms of formulaic writing (e.g. weather forecasts and sports reporting) without the direct involvement of humans{{sfnp|Reiter|Dale|2000}} after initial configuration or, more commonly, to be used to support writing processes such as generating initial drafts, producing feedback with the help of a rubric, copy-editing, and [[machine translation|helping translation]].{{sfnp|Katsnelson|2022|pp=208–209}}
=== Motivations and purposes ===
=== Motivations and purposes ===
[[File:Olin-Warner-LoC-tympanum-Highsmith.jpeg|thumb|upright=1.2|A bronze [[tympanum (architecture)|tympanum]] featuring the [[personification]] of Writing, above the main entrance to the [[Thomas Jefferson Building]] in Washington, D.C., sculpted by [[Olin Levi Warner]] in 1896]]
[[File:Olin-Warner-LoC-tympanum-Highsmith.jpeg|thumb|upright=1.2|A bronze [[tympanum (architecture)|tympanum]] featuring the [[personification]] of Writing, above the main entrance to the [[Thomas Jefferson Building]] in Washington, D.C., sculpted by [[Olin Levi Warner]] in 1896]]
As human societies emerged, collective motivations for the [[development of writing]] were driven by pragmatic exigencies like keeping track of produce and other wealth, recording [[history]], maintaining [[culture]], codifying knowledge through [[curricula]] and lists of texts deemed to contain foundational knowledge (e.g. ''[[The Canon of Medicine]]'') or artistic value (e.g. the [[literary canon]]), organizing and governing societies through texts including [[legal codes]], [[census]] records, [[contract]]s, [[deed]]s of ownership, [[tax]]ation, [[trade agreement]]s, and [[treaties]].{{sfnp|Anderson|2007|pp=177–190}} As [[Charles Bazerman]] explains, the "marking of signs on stones, clay, paper, and now digital memories—each more portable and rapidly traveling than the previous—provided means for increasingly coordinated and extended action as well as memory across larger groups of people over time and space."{{sfnp|Bazerman|2013|p=193}} For example, around the 4th millennium BC, the complexity of trade and administration in [[Mesopotamia]] outgrew human memory, and writing became a more dependable method for creating permanent records of transactions.{{sfnp|Green|1981|pp=345–372}} On the other hand, writing in both [[ancient Egypt]] and [[Mesoamerica]] may have evolved through the political necessity to manage the [[calendar]] for recording historical and environmental events.{{sfnp|Ray|1986|pp=307–316}}{{sfnp|Justeson|1986|pp=437–458}} Further innovations included more uniform, predictable, and widely dispersed legal systems, the distribution of accessible versions of [[sacred texts]], and furthering practices of [[scientific inquiry]] and [[knowledge management]], all of which were largely reliant on portable and easily reproducible forms of inscribed language. The [[history of writing]] is co-extensive with uses of writing and the elaboration of [[Soft systems methodology#Human activity system|activity systems]] that give rise to and circulate writing.
Historically, writing emerged to address the needs of societies growing in economic and social complexity. Once developed, potential applications included tracking produce and other wealth, recording [[history]], maintaining [[culture]], codifying knowledge through [[curricula]] as well as lists of texts deemed to contain foundational knowledge (e.g. ''[[The Canon of Medicine]]'') or artistic value (e.g. the [[literary canon]]). Aids to administration included [[legal codes]], [[census]] records, [[contract]]s, [[deed]]s of ownership, [[tax]]ation, [[trade agreement]]s, and [[treaties]]. As [[Charles Bazerman]] explains, the "marking of signs on stones, clay, paper, and now digital memories—each more portable and rapidly traveling than the previous—provided means for increasingly coordinated and extended action as well as memory across larger groups of people over time and space."{{sfnp|Bazerman|2013|p=193}} Further innovations included more uniform, predictable, and widely dispersed legal systems, the distribution of accessible versions of [[sacred texts]], and furthering practices of [[scientific inquiry]] and [[knowledge management]], all of which were largely reliant on portable and easily reproducible forms of inscribed language. The [[history of writing]] is co-extensive with uses of writing and the elaboration of [[Soft systems methodology#Human activity system|activity systems]] that give rise to and circulate writing.{{sfnp|Andersen|2007|pp=214–231}}


Individual motivations for writing include improvised additional capacity for the limitations of human [[memory]]{{sfnp|Hutchins|1995}} (e.g. [[to-do lists]], [[recipe]]s, reminders, [[logbook]]s, [[map]]s, the proper sequence for a complicated task or important [[ritual]]), dissemination of ideas and coordination (e.g. [[essay]]s, [[monograph]]s, [[Broadside (printing)|broadsides]], [[plan]]s, [[petition]]s, or [[manifesto]]s), creativity and [[storytelling]], maintaining [[kinship]] and other social networks,{{sfnp|Christiansen|2017|pp=135–164}} [[business correspondence]] regarding goods and services, and [[life writing]] (e.g. a [[diary]] or journal).{{sfnp|Lindenman|Driscoll|Efthymiou|Pavesich|2024|pp=70–106}}
Individual motivations for writing include the ability to operate beyond the limitations of one's own [[memory]]{{sfnp|Hutchins|1995}} (e.g. [[to-do lists]], [[recipe]]s, reminders, [[logbook]]s, [[map]]s, the proper sequence for a complicated task or important [[ritual]]), dissemination of ideas and coordination (e.g. [[essay]]s, [[monograph]]s, [[Broadside (printing)|broadsides]], [[plan]]s, [[petition]]s, or [[manifesto]]s), creativity and [[storytelling]], maintaining [[kinship]] and other social networks,{{sfnp|Christiansen|2017|pp=135–164}} [[business correspondence]] regarding goods and services, and [[life writing]] (e.g. a [[diary]] or journal).{{sfnp|Lindenman|Driscoll|Efthymiou|Pavesich|2024|pp=70–106}}


The global spread of digital [[communication]] systems such as [[email]] and [[social media]] has made writing an increasingly important feature of daily life, where these systems mix with older technologies like paper, pencils, whiteboards, printers, and copiers.{{sfnp|Sterponi|Zucchermaglio|Alby|Fatigante|2017|pp=359–386}} Substantial amounts of everyday writing characterize most workplaces in [[developed countries]].{{sfnp|Brandt|2015|p=3}} In many occupations (e.g. law, [[accounting]], [[software design]], [[human resources]]), written documentation is not only the main deliverable but also the mode of work itself.{{sfnp|Jakobs|Spinuzzi|2014|p=360}} Even in occupations not typically associated with writing, routine [[records management]] has most employees writing at least some of the time.{{sfnp|Beaufort|2007|pp=221–237}}
The global spread of digital [[communication]] systems such as [[email]] and [[social media]] has made writing an increasingly important feature of daily life, where these systems mix with older technologies like paper, pencils, whiteboards, printers, and copiers.{{sfnp|Sterponi|Zucchermaglio|Alby|Fatigante|2017|pp=359–386}} Substantial amounts of everyday writing characterize most workplaces in [[developed countries]].{{sfnp|Brandt|2015|p=3}} In many occupations (e.g. law, [[accounting]], [[software design]], [[human resources]]), written documentation is not only the main deliverable but also the mode of work itself.{{sfnp|Jakobs|Spinuzzi|2014|p=360}} Even in occupations not typically associated with writing, routine [[records management]] has most employees writing at least some of the time.{{sfnp|Beaufort|2007|pp=221–237}}
Line 59: Line 56:
=== Logographies ===
=== Logographies ===
[[File:Comparative evolution of Cuneiform, Egyptian and Chinese characters.svg|thumb|Comparative evolution from pictograms to abstract shapes, in Mesopotamian [[cuneiform]]s, [[Egyptian hieroglyph]]s and [[Chinese characters]]]]
[[File:Comparative evolution of Cuneiform, Egyptian and Chinese characters.svg|thumb|Comparative evolution from pictograms to abstract shapes, in Mesopotamian [[cuneiform]]s, [[Egyptian hieroglyph]]s and [[Chinese characters]]]]
A logography is written using [[logogram]]s{{snd}}written characters which represent individual [[word]]s or [[morpheme]]s.{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}} For example, the Maya glyph for 'fin', pronounced ''ka'', was also used to represent the syllable ''ka'' whenever the pronunciation of a logogram needed to be indicated. Many logograms have an [[ideographic]] component (e.g. [[Chinese character radicals]], [[hieroglyphic determinatives]]).
A logography is written using [[logogram]]s{{snd}}written characters which represent individual [[word]]s or [[morpheme]]s.{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}} Many logograms have internal structures, with components potentially representing both phonographic and [[ideographic]] (e.g. [[Chinese character radicals]], [[hieroglyphic determinatives]]) aspects of the morpheme.{{sfnp|Condorelli|2022|pp=61–62}}


The main logographic system in use is [[Chinese characters]], used primarily to write the [[Chinese languages]] and [[Japanese language|Japanese]], and historically others from regions influenced by [[Chinese culture]], such as [[Korean language|Korean]] and [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]]. Other logographic systems include [[cuneiform]] and [[Maya script]].{{citation needed|date=June 2023}}
The main logographic system in use is [[Chinese characters]], used primarily to write the [[Chinese languages]] and [[Japanese language|Japanese]], and historically others from regions influenced by [[Chinese culture]], such as [[Korean language|Korean]] and [[Vietnamese language|Vietnamese]]. Other logographic systems include [[cuneiform]] and [[Maya script]].{{sfnpm|Gnanadesikan|2009|1p=11|Goody|1987|2p=18}}


=== Syllabaries ===
=== Syllabaries ===
A [[syllabary]] is a set of written symbols that represent [[syllable]]s,{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}} typically a consonant followed by a vowel, or just a vowel alone. In some scripts more complex syllables (e.g. consonant–vowel–consonant or consonant–consonant–vowel) may have dedicated glyphs. Phonetically similar syllables are not written similarly.{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}} For instance, the syllable ''ka'' may look nothing like the syllable ''ki'', nor will syllables with the same vowels be similar.{{citation needed|date=June 2023}}
A [[syllabary]] is a set of written symbols that represent [[syllable]]s,{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}} typically a consonant followed by a vowel, or just a vowel alone. In some scripts more complex syllables (e.g. consonant–vowel–consonant or consonant–consonant–vowel) may have dedicated glyphs. Phonetically similar syllables are not written similarly.{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}}


Syllabaries are best suited to languages with a relatively simple syllable structure, such as Japanese. Other languages that use syllabic writing include [[Mycenaean Greek]] ([[Linear B]]), [[Cherokee syllabary|Cherokee]],{{sfnp|Cushman|2011|pp=255–281}} the [[Ndyuka language|Ndjuka]] creole language of [[Suriname]], and the [[Vai language]] of [[Liberia]].
Syllabaries are best suited to languages with a relatively simple syllable structure, such as Japanese. Other syllabic scripts include [[Linear B]] and the [[Cherokee syllabary]].{{sfnp|Cushman|2011|pp=255–281}}


=== Alphabets ===
=== Alphabets ===
Line 81: Line 78:
{{Main|History of writing}}
{{Main|History of writing}}
{{redirect|Writings|the section of the Hebrew Bible|Ketuvim}}
{{redirect|Writings|the section of the Hebrew Bible|Ketuvim}}
Writing first emerged in the [[Early Bronze Age]] to meet the growing economic needs of the city-states of [[Sumeria]], located in southern [[Mesopotamia]]. During this time, the complexity of trade and administration outgrew the power of memory, with [[Sumerian cuneiform]] serving as a reliable means for recording transactions, maintaining financial accounts, and keeping historical records, among similar activities.{{sfnp|Robinson|2019|p=36}}
Cuneiform, used to write the [[Sumerian language]], was followed relatively quickly by [[Egyptian hieroglyphs]], with both emerging from proto-writing systems between 3500 and 2900 BC,{{sfnp|Finegan|2019}} and the earliest coherent texts attested {{circa|2600 BC}}. While hieroglyphs lack any sign of being directly influenced by cuneiform in either form or function, the degree to which [[cultural diffusion]] from Mesopotamia, if any, played a part in the development of Egyptian writing is not universally agreed upon.


=== Mesopotamia ===
=== Mesopotamia ===
While research into the development of writing during the [[Neolithic]] is ongoing, the current consensus is that it first evolved from economic necessity in the [[ancient Near East]]. Writing most likely began as a consequence of political expansion in ancient cultures, which needed reliable means for transmitting information, maintaining financial accounts, keeping historical records, and similar activities. Around the 4th millennium BC, the complexity of trade and administration outgrew the power of memory, and writing became a more dependable method of recording and presenting transactions in a permanent form.{{sfnp|Robinson|2003|p=36}}
The invention of the first writing systems is roughly contemporary with the emergence of civilizations and the beginning of the [[Bronze Age]] during the late 4th millennium BC. [[Cuneiform]] used to write the [[Sumerian language]] and [[Egyptian hieroglyphs]] are generally considered the earliest writing systems, both emerging out of proto-writing systems between 3500 and 2900 BC,{{sfnp|Finegan|2019}} with earliest coherent texts from {{circa|2600 BC}}. It is generally agreed that Sumerian writing was an independent invention; however, it is debated whether Egyptian writing was developed completely independently of Sumerian, or was a case of [[cultural diffusion]].
[[File:Accountancy clay envelope Louvre Sb1932.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Globular envelope with a cluster of accountancy tokens, Uruk period, from [[Susa]]{{snd}}[[Louvre Museum]]]]
[[File:Accountancy clay envelope Louvre Sb1932.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Globular envelope with a cluster of accountancy tokens, Uruk period, from [[Susa]]{{snd}}[[Louvre Museum]]]]
Archaeologist [[Denise Schmandt-Besserat]] presented a theory establishing a link between previously uncategorized clay "tokens", the oldest of which have been found in the Zagros region of Iran, and cuneiform, the first known writing. Around 8000 BC, Mesopotamians began using clay tokens to count their agricultural and manufactured goods. Later they began placing these tokens inside large, hollow clay containers (bulla, or globular envelopes) which were then sealed. The quantity of tokens in each container came to be expressed by impressing, on the container's surface, one picture for each instance of the token inside. They next dispensed with the tokens, relying solely on symbols for the tokens, drawn on clay surfaces. To avoid making a picture for each instance of the same object (for example: 100 pictures of a hat to represent 100 hats), they counted the objects by using various small marks.{{sfnp|Woods|Emberling|Teeter|2010|p=15}}
Archaeologist [[Denise Schmandt-Besserat]] presented a theory establishing a link between cuneiform and previously uncategorized clay "tokens", the oldest of which have been found in the Zagros region of Iran. Around 8000 BC, Mesopotamians began using clay tokens to count their agricultural and manufactured goods. Later they began placing these tokens inside large, hollow clay containers (bulla, or globular envelopes) which were then sealed. The quantity of tokens in each container came to be expressed by impressing, on the container's surface, one picture for each instance of the token inside. They next dispensed with the tokens, relying solely on symbols for the tokens, drawn on clay surfaces. To avoid making a picture for each instance of the same object (for example: 100 pictures of a hat to represent 100 hats), they counted the objects by using various small marks.{{sfnp|Woods|Emberling|Teeter|2010|p=15}}


The original [[Mesopotamian]] writing system emerged {{cx|3200 BC}} from this method of keeping accounts. By the end of the 4th millennium BC,{{sfnp|Kramer|1981|pp=381–383}} the Mesopotamians were using a triangular-shaped stylus pressed into soft clay to record numbers. This system was gradually augmented with using a sharp stylus to indicate what was being counted by means of [[pictographs]]. Round and sharp styluses were gradually replaced for writing by wedge-shaped styluses (hence the term ''cuneiform'', from Latin {{lang|la|cunius}} 'wedge'){{snd}}at first only for [[logogram]]s, with phonetic elements introduced by the 29th century BC. Around 2700 BC, cuneiform began to represent syllables of spoken Sumerian. About that time, Mesopotamian cuneiform became a general purpose writing system for logograms, syllables, and numbers. This script was adapted to another Mesopotamian language, the East Semitic [[Akkadian language|Akkadian]] ([[Old Assyrian period|Assyrian]] and [[Babylonia]]n) {{cx|2600 BC}}, and then to others such as [[Elamite]], [[Hattian language|Hattian]], [[Hurrian language|Hurrian]] and [[Hittite language|Hittite]]. Scripts similar in appearance to this writing system include those for [[Ugaritic]] and [[Old Persian]]. With the adoption of [[Aramaic]] as the lingua franca of the [[Neo-Assyrian Empire]] (911–609 BC), Old Aramaic was also adapted to Mesopotamian cuneiform. The latest cuneiform texts in Akkadian discovered thus far date from the 1st century AD.{{sfnp|Geller|1997}}
Cuneiform emerged {{cx|3200 BC}} in the context of this technology for keeping accounts. By the end of the 4th millennium BC,{{sfnp|Kramer|1981|pp=381–383}} the Mesopotamians were using a triangular-shaped stylus pressed into soft clay to record numbers. This system was gradually augmented with using a sharp stylus to indicate what was being counted by means of [[pictographs]]. Round and sharp styluses were gradually replaced for writing by wedge-shaped styluses (hence the term ''cuneiform'', from Latin {{lang|la|cunius}} 'wedge'){{snd}}at first only for [[logogram]]s, with phonetic elements introduced by the 29th century BC. Around 2700 BC, cuneiform began to represent syllables of spoken Sumerian. About that time, Mesopotamian cuneiform became a general purpose writing system for logograms, syllables, and numbers. This script was adapted to another Mesopotamian language, the East Semitic [[Akkadian language|Akkadian]] ([[Old Assyrian period|Assyrian]] and [[Babylonia]]n) {{cx|2600 BC}}, and then to others such as [[Elamite]], [[Hattian language|Hattian]], [[Hurrian language|Hurrian]] and [[Hittite language|Hittite]]. Scripts similar in appearance to this writing system include those for [[Ugaritic]] and [[Old Persian]]. With the adoption of [[Aramaic]] as the lingua franca of the [[Neo-Assyrian Empire]] (911–609 BC), Old Aramaic was also adapted to Mesopotamian cuneiform. The latest cuneiform texts in Akkadian discovered thus far date from the 1st century AD.{{sfnp|Geller|1997}}


=== Egypt ===
=== Egypt ===
[[File:Narmer Palette serpopard side.jpg|upright=0.8|thumb|[[Narmer Palette]], with the two [[Serpopard]]s representing unification of [[Upper Egypt|Upper]] and [[Lower Egypt]], {{cx|3100 BC}}]]
[[File:Narmer Palette serpopard side.jpg|upright=0.8|thumb|[[Narmer Palette]], with the two [[Serpopard]]s representing unification of [[Upper Egypt|Upper]] and [[Lower Egypt]], {{cx|3100 BC}}]]
The earliest known [[hieroglyphs]] date to around 5,200 years ago, with attestation including the clay labels of the [[Predynastic Egypt|Predynastic]] ruler "Scorpion I" (Naqada IIIA period, {{cx|33nd century BC}}) recovered at Abydos (modern Umm el-Qa'ab) in 1998 or the [[Narmer Palette]], dated {{cx|3100 BC}}.{{sfnp|Mattessich|2002}} The hieroglyphic script was [[logographic]] with phonetic adjuncts that included an effective [[Egyptian hieroglyph#Script|alphabet]]. The world's oldest deciphered sentence was found on a seal impression in the tomb of [[Seth-Peribsen]] at Abydos, dating to the Second Dynasty (28th or 27th century BC). Around 800 hieroglyphs were used during the Old, Middle, and New Kingdom periods (2686–1077 BC); by the Greco-Roman period (30 BC{{snd}}642 AD), more than 5,000 distinct glyphs are attested.{{sfnp|Loprieno|1995|p=12}}
The earliest known [[hieroglyphs]] are clay labels for the [[Predynastic Egypt|Predynastic]] ruler "Scorpion I", dated {{cx|the 33nd century BC}} and recovered at [[Abydos, Egypt|Abydos]] (modern Umm el-Qa'ab), or otherwise the [[Narmer Palette]] dated {{cx|3100 BC}}.{{sfnp|Mattessich|2002}} The hieroglyphic script was [[logographic]], with phonetic adjuncts that included an effective [[Egyptian hieroglyph#Script|alphabet]]. The oldest deciphered sentence is attested on a seal impression from the tomb of [[Seth-Peribsen]] at Abydos, dating to the [[Second Dynasty]] (28th or 27th century BC). Around 800 hieroglyphs were used during the Old, Middle, and New Kingdom periods (2686–1077 BC); by the Greco-Roman period (30 BC{{snd}}642 AD), more than 5,000 distinct glyphs are attested.{{sfnp|Loprieno|1995|p=12}}


Writing was very important in maintaining the Egyptian empire, and literacy was concentrated among an educated elite of [[scribe]]s.{{sfnp|Lipson|2004|page=9}} Only people from certain backgrounds were allowed to train to become scribes, in the service of temple, pharaonic, and military authorities. The hieroglyph system was complex and difficult to master.
Writing was very important in maintaining the Egyptian empire, and literacy was concentrated among an educated elite of [[scribe]]s.{{sfnp|Lipson|2004|page=9}} Only people from certain backgrounds were allowed to train to become scribes, in the service of temple, pharaonic, and military authorities. The hieroglyph system was complex and difficult to master.


Alphabetic writing is only known to have been invented once in human history. Around the mid-19th century BC, the [[Proto-Sinaitic script]] emerged among a community of Canaanite turquoise miners in the [[Sinai Peninsula]].{{sfnp|Goldwasser|2010}} Around 30 crude inscriptions have been found at a mountainous Egyptian mining site known as Serabit el-Khadem, with symbols that stood for single consonant sounds rather than whole words or concepts{{snd}}the basis of an alphabetic system. It was not until between the 12th and 9th centuries that use of the alphabet became widespread.{{sfnp|Goldwasser|2010}}
Alphabetic writing is only known to have been invented once in human history. Around the mid-19th century BC, the [[Proto-Sinaitic script]] emerged among a community of Canaanite turquoise miners in the [[Sinai Peninsula]].{{sfnp|Goldwasser|2010}} Around 30 crude inscriptions have been found at a mountainous Egyptian mining site known as Serabit el-Khadem, with symbols that stood for single consonant sounds rather than whole words or concepts{{snd}}the basis of an alphabetic system. It was not until between the 12th and 9th centuries BC that use of the alphabet became widespread.{{sfnp|Goldwasser|2010}}


=== Mesoamerica ===
=== Mesoamerica ===
Line 110: Line 106:


=== Elamite scripts ===
=== Elamite scripts ===
Over the centuries, three distinct Elamite scripts developed. [[Proto-Elamite]] is the oldest known writing system from Iran. In use ({{cx|3200|2900 BC}}), clay tablets with Proto-Elamite writing have been found at different sites across Iran, with the majority having been excavated at [[Susa]], an ancient city located east of the [[Tigris]] and between the Karkheh and Dez rivers.{{sfnp|Dahl|2018|pp=383–396}} The Proto-Elamite script is thought to have developed from early [[cuneiform]] (proto-cuneiform). The Proto-Elamite script consists of more than 1,000 signs and is thought to be partly [[logographic]]. The [[Elamite cuneiform]] script was used from {{cx|2500}} to 331 BC, and was adapted from the Akkadian cuneiform. At any given point within this period, the Elamite cuneiform script consisted of about 130 symbols, and over this entire period only 206 total signs were used. This is far fewer than most other cuneiform scripts.{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}}
Over the centuries, three distinct Elamite scripts developed. [[Proto-Elamite]] is the oldest known writing system from Iran. In use {{cx|3200|2900 BC}}, clay tablets with Proto-Elamite writing have been found at different sites across Iran, with the majority having been excavated at [[Susa]], an ancient city located east of the [[Tigris]] and between the Karkheh and Dez rivers.{{sfnp|Dahl|2018|pp=383–396}} The Proto-Elamite script is thought to have developed from early [[cuneiform]] (proto-cuneiform). The Proto-Elamite script consists of more than 1,000 signs and is thought to be partly [[logographic]]. The [[Elamite cuneiform]] script was used from {{cx|2500}} to 331 BC, and was adapted from the Akkadian cuneiform. At any given point within this period, the Elamite cuneiform script consisted of about 130 symbols, and over this entire period only 206 total signs were used. This is far fewer than most other cuneiform scripts.{{sfnp|Daniels|Bright|1996|p=56}}


=== Europe ===
=== Europe ===
Line 118: Line 114:
=== Development of the alphabet ===
=== Development of the alphabet ===
{{Main|History of the alphabet}}
{{Main|History of the alphabet}}
The [[Proto-Sinaitic]] script, in which [[Proto-Canaanite]] is believed to have been first written, is attested as early as the 19th century BC. The [[Phoenician alphabet]] was adapted from the Proto-Canaanite script sometime before the 14th century BC, which in turn borrowed principles of representing phonetic information from [[Egyptian hieroglyphs]]. This writing system was an odd sort of syllabary in which only consonants are represented. This script was adapted by the [[Greek alphabet|Greeks]], who adapted certain consonantal signs to represent their vowels. The [[Cumae alphabet]], a variant of the early Greek alphabet, gave rise to the [[Etruscan alphabet]] and its own descendants, such as the [[Latin alphabet]] and [[rune]]s. Other descendants from the [[Greek alphabet]] include [[Cyrillic]], used to write [[Bulgarian language|Bulgarian]], [[Russian language|Russian]] and [[Serbian language|Serbian]], among others. The Phoenician system was also adapted into the [[Aramaic script]], from which the [[Hebrew script|Hebrew]] and the [[Arabic script]]s are descended.{{citation needed|date=June 2023}}
The first alphabetic writing was developed by workers in the [[Sinai Peninsula]] to write [[West Semitic languages]] {{circa|1800 BC|lk=no}}, "in the context of cultural exchanges between Semitic-speaking people from the Levant and communities in Egypt".{{sfnp|Drucker|2022|p=188}} This earliest attested form is known as the ''[[Proto-Sinaitic script]]'', and it adapted concepts and at least some of its written letterforms from Egyptian hieroglyphic writing; it adopted wholly West Semitic sound values for its letters, as opposed to adapting existing Egyptian ones.{{sfnpm|Drucker|2022|1pp=187–189|Fischer|2001|2pp=84–85}} Precise dating of its origin, as well as the graphical origins of many letterforms (if any) remain unclear, and the script remains undeciphered.{{sfnpm|Fischer|2001|1p=85|Haring|2020|2pp=53–54}}
 
The [[Phoenician alphabet]] ({{circa|1050 BC|lk=no}}) is a direct descendant of Proto-Sinaitic. Proto-Sinaitic and Phoenician were [[abjad]]s which only had letters representing consonantal sounds; Phoenician was ultimately adapted into the [[Greek alphabet]] ({{cx|800 BC|lk=no}}), the first to represent vowel sounds, which it did by re-purposing unused Phoenician consonantal signs.{{sfnp|Fischer|2001|pp=84–86}} The [[Cumae alphabet]], a variant of the early Greek alphabet, gave rise to the [[Etruscan alphabet]] and its own descendants, such as the [[Latin alphabet]]. Other descendants from the Greek alphabet include [[Cyrillic]], used to write [[Bulgarian language|Bulgarian]] and [[Russian language|Russian]], among other languages. The Phoenician alphabet was also adapted into the [[Aramaic script]], from which the [[Hebrew script|Hebrew]] and the [[Arabic script]]s are descended.{{citation needed|date=June 2023}}


=== Religious texts ===
=== Religious texts ===
Line 135: Line 133:
{{bots|deny=Citation bot}}
{{bots|deny=Citation bot}}
{{CS1 config|mode=cs1}}
{{CS1 config|mode=cs1}}
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist|20em}}


=== Works cited ===
=== Works cited ===
Line 144: Line 142:
** {{Harvc |last=Emig |first=Janet |c=Writing as a mode of learning |in1=Bazerman |in2=Russell |year=1994 |pages=89–96}}
** {{Harvc |last=Emig |first=Janet |c=Writing as a mode of learning |in1=Bazerman |in2=Russell |year=1994 |pages=89–96}}
* {{Cite book |title=Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-8058-4870-0 |editor-last=Bazerman |editor-first=Charles |editor-mask=3 |location=New York}}
* {{Cite book |title=Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-8058-4870-0 |editor-last=Bazerman |editor-first=Charles |editor-mask=3 |location=New York}}
** {{Harvc |last=Anderson |first=Jack |c=The collection and organization of written knowledge |in=Bazerman |year=2007 |pages=177–190}}
** {{Harvc |last=Andersen |first=Jack |c=The collection and organization of written knowledge |in=Bazerman |year=2007 |pages=214–232}}
** {{Harvc |last=Beaufort |first=Anne |c=Writing in the professions |in=Bazerman |year=2007 |pages=269–289}}
** {{Harvc |last=Beaufort |first=Anne |c=Writing in the professions |in=Bazerman |year=2007 |pages=269–289}}
** {{Harvc |last=Conboy |first=Martin |c=Writing and journalism: politics, social movements, and the public sphere |in=Bazerman |year=2007 |pages=249–268}}
** {{Harvc |last=Conboy |first=Martin |c=Writing and journalism: politics, social movements, and the public sphere |in=Bazerman |year=2007 |pages=249–268}}
Line 150: Line 148:
* {{Cite book |last=Bazerman |first=Charles |url=https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/literateaction/v2/theory.pdf |title=A Theory of Literate Action |publisher=Parlor |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-60235-477-7 |volume=2 |chapter=Literacy and the organization of society |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bazerman |first=Charles |url=https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/literateaction/v2/theory.pdf |title=A Theory of Literate Action |publisher=Parlor |year=2013 |isbn=978-1-60235-477-7 |volume=2 |chapter=Literacy and the organization of society |author-mask=3}}
* {{Cite book |last=Boltz |first=William |title=The Cambridge History of Ancient China |title-link=The Cambridge History of Ancient China |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-521-47030-8 |editor-last=Loewe |editor-first=Michael |pages=74–123 |chapter=Language and Writing |editor-last2=Shaughnessy |editor-first2=Edward L.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Boltz |first=William |title=The Cambridge History of Ancient China |title-link=The Cambridge History of Ancient China |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-521-47030-8 |editor-last=Loewe |editor-first=Michael |pages=74–123 |chapter=Language and Writing |editor-last2=Shaughnessy |editor-first2=Edward L.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Brandt |first=Deborah |title=The Rise of Writing |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-107-46211-3}}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Boyes |editor-first=Philip J. |editor-last2=Steele |editor-first2=Philippa M. |title=Understanding Relations Between Scripts: Early Alphabets |volume=II |publisher=Oxbow |year=2020 |isbn=978-1-78925-092-3}}
** {{Harvc |last=Haring |first=Ben |chapter=Ancient Egypt and the earliest known stages of alphabetic writing |pages=53–68 |in1=Boyes |in2=Steele |year=2020}}
* {{Cite book |last=Brandt |first=Deborah |title=The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy in America |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-1-107-46211-3}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Christiansen |first=M. Sidury |year=2017 |title=Creating a Unique Transnational Place: Deterritorialized Discourse and the Blending of Time and Space in Online Media |journal=Written Communication |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=135–164 |doi=10.1177/0741088317693996 |s2cid=151827910}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Christiansen |first=M. Sidury |year=2017 |title=Creating a Unique Transnational Place: Deterritorialized Discourse and the Blending of Time and Space in Online Media |journal=Written Communication |volume=34 |issue=2 |pages=135–164 |doi=10.1177/0741088317693996 |s2cid=151827910}}
* {{Cite book |last=Condorelli |first=Marco |title=Introducing Historical Orthography |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-1-00-910073-1}}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Crowley |editor-first=David |editor-last2=Heyer |editor-first2=Paul |editor-last3=Urquhart |editor-first3=Peter |title=Communication in History: Stone Age Symbols to Social Media |publisher=Routledge |edition=7th |year=2019 |orig-year=1991 |isbn=978-1-138-72947-6}}
** {{Harvc |last=Robinson |first=Andrew |c=The Origins of Writing |year=2019 |in=Crowley |in2=Heyer |in3=Urquhart |pages=32–39}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Cushman |first=Ellen |year=2011 |title=The Cherokee Syllabary: A Writing System in its Own Right |journal=Written Communication |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=255–281 |doi=10.1177/0741088311410172 |s2cid=144180867}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Cushman |first=Ellen |year=2011 |title=The Cherokee Syllabary: A Writing System in its Own Right |journal=Written Communication |volume=28 |issue=3 |pages=255–281 |doi=10.1177/0741088311410172 |s2cid=144180867}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dahl |first=Jacob L. |title=The Elamite World |year=2018 |isbn=978-1-315-65803-2 |pages=383–396 |chapter=The proto-Elamite writing system |doi=10.4324/9781315658032-20}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dahl |first=Jacob L. |title=The Elamite World |year=2018 |isbn=978-1-315-65803-2 |pages=383–396 |chapter=The proto-Elamite writing system |doi=10.4324/9781315658032-20}}
Line 157: Line 160:
* {{Cite book |last=Devitt |first=Amy J. |title=Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |year=1991 |location=Madison |pages=336–357 |chapter=Intertextuality in Tax Accounting: Generic, Referential, and Functional}}
* {{Cite book |last=Devitt |first=Amy J. |title=Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |year=1991 |location=Madison |pages=336–357 |chapter=Intertextuality in Tax Accounting: Generic, Referential, and Functional}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dooley |first=John F. |title=Software Development, Design and Coding: With Patterns, Debugging, Unit Testing, and Refactoring |publisher=Apress |year=2017 |isbn=978-1-4842-3152-4 |edition=2nd |doi=10.1007/978-1-4842-3153-1}}
* {{Cite book |last=Dooley |first=John F. |title=Software Development, Design and Coding: With Patterns, Debugging, Unit Testing, and Refactoring |publisher=Apress |year=2017 |isbn=978-1-4842-3152-4 |edition=2nd |doi=10.1007/978-1-4842-3153-1}}
* {{Cite book |last=Drucker |first=Johanna |title=Inventing the Alphabet |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2022 |isbn=978-0-226-81581-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Fischer |first=Steven Roger |author-link=Steven Roger Fischer |title=A History of Writing |publisher=Reaktion |year=2001 |isbn=978-1-86189-101-3 |series=Globalities}}
* {{Cite book |last=Finegan |first=Jack |title=Archaeological History Of The Ancient Middle East |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-429-72638-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Finegan |first=Jack |title=Archaeological History Of The Ancient Middle East |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2019 |isbn=978-0-429-72638-5}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Geller |first=Markham Judah |title=The Last Wedge |journal=Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie |date=1997 |volume=87 |issue=1 |pages=43–95 |doi=10.1515/zava.1997.87.1.43 |s2cid=161968187}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Geller |first=Markham Judah |title=The Last Wedge |journal=Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie |date=1997 |volume=87 |issue=1 |pages=43–95 |doi=10.1515/zava.1997.87.1.43 |s2cid=161968187}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gnanadesikan |first=Amalia E. |title=The Writing Revolution: Cuneiform to the Internet |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=2009 |isbn=978-1-4051-5406-2 |series=The Language Library}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Goldwasser |first=Orly |author-link=Orly Goldwasser |date=Mar–Apr 2010 |title=How the Alphabet Was Born from Hieroglyphs |journal=Biblical Archaeology Review |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=38–50}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Goldwasser |first=Orly |author-link=Orly Goldwasser |date=Mar–Apr 2010 |title=How the Alphabet Was Born from Hieroglyphs |journal=Biblical Archaeology Review |volume=36 |issue=2 |pages=38–50}}
* {{Cite book |last=Goody |first=Jack |title=The Interface Between the Written and the Oral |year=1987 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0-521-33268-0 |author-link=Jack Goody}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Green |first=M. W. |year=1981 |title=The Construction and Implementation of the Cuneiform Writing System |journal=Visible Language |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=345–372 |issn=0022-2224}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Green |first=M. W. |year=1981 |title=The Construction and Implementation of the Cuneiform Writing System |journal=Visible Language |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=345–372 |issn=0022-2224}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haas |first=Christina |title=Writing technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-8058-1306-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Haas |first=Christina |title=Writing technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy |publisher=Lawrence Erlbaum Associates |year=1996 |isbn=978-0-8058-1306-7}}
Line 165: Line 172:
* {{Cite book |last=Hutchins |first=Edwin |title=Cognition in the Wild |publisher=MIT Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-262-58146-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hutchins |first=Edwin |title=Cognition in the Wild |publisher=MIT Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-262-58146-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hyland |first=Ken |title=Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing |publisher=University of Michigan Press |year=2004 |isbn=0-472-03024-8 |location=Ann Arbor}}
* {{Cite book |last=Hyland |first=Ken |title=Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing |publisher=University of Michigan Press |year=2004 |isbn=0-472-03024-8 |location=Ann Arbor}}
* {{Cite book |last=Jakobs |first=Eva-Maria |title=Handbook of writing and text production |last2=Perrin |first2=Daniel |publisher=De Gruyter Mouton |year=2014 |isbn=978-3-11-022063-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Jakobs |first=Eva-Maria |title=Handbook of Writing and Text Production |last2=Perrin |first2=Daniel |publisher=De Gruyter Mouton |year=2014 |isbn=978-3-11-022063-6}}
** {{Harvc |last=Jakobs |first=Eva-Maria |last2=Perrin |first2=Daniel |c=Introduction and research roadmap: writing and text production |pages=1–25 |in1=Jakobs |in2=Perrin |year=2014a}}
** {{Harvc |last=Jakobs |first=Eva-Maria |last2=Perrin |first2=Daniel |c=Introduction and research roadmap: writing and text production |pages=1–25 |in1=Jakobs |in2=Perrin |year=2014 |id={{sfnref|Jakobs|Perrin|2014a}}}}
** {{Harvc |last=Jakobs |first=Eva-Maria |last2=Spinuzzi |first2=Daniel |c=Professional domains: writing as creation of economic value |pages=359–383 |in1=Jakobs |in2=Perrin |year=2014}}
** {{Harvc |last=Jakobs |first=Eva-Maria |last2=Spinuzzi |first2=Daniel |c=Professional domains: writing as creation of economic value |pages=359–383 |in1=Jakobs |in2=Perrin |year=2014}}
** {{Harvc |last=Mahlow |first=Cerstin |last2=Dale |first2=Robert |c=Production media: writing as using tools in media convergent environments |pages=209–230 |in1=Jakobs |in2=Perrin |year=2014}}
* {{Cite book |last=Johnston |first=Sarah Iles |title=Ancient Religions |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-674-26477-9}}
* {{Cite book |last=Johnston |first=Sarah Iles |title=Ancient Religions |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0-674-26477-9}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Justeson |first=John S. |year=1986 |title=The Origin of Writing Systems: Preclassic Mesoamerica |journal=World Archaeology |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=437–458 |doi=10.1080/00438243.1986.9979981 |issn=0043-8243 |jstor=124706}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Justeson |first=John S. |year=1986 |title=The Origin of Writing Systems: Preclassic Mesoamerica |journal=World Archaeology |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=437–458 |doi=10.1080/00438243.1986.9979981 |issn=0043-8243 |jstor=124706}}
Line 178: Line 186:
* {{Cite book |title=Observing Writing: Insights from Keystroke Logging and Handwriting |publisher=Brill |year=2019 |isbn=978-90-04-39251-9 |editor-last=Lindgren |editor-first=E. |location=Leiden |editor-last2=Sullivan |editor-first2=K.}}
* {{Cite book |title=Observing Writing: Insights from Keystroke Logging and Handwriting |publisher=Brill |year=2019 |isbn=978-90-04-39251-9 |editor-last=Lindgren |editor-first=E. |location=Leiden |editor-last2=Sullivan |editor-first2=K.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Loprieno |first=Antonio |title=Ancient Egyptian |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-521-44384-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Loprieno |first=Antonio |title=Ancient Egyptian |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1995 |isbn=978-0-521-44384-5}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lipson |first=Carol |title=Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7914-6099-3 |editor-last=Lipson |editor-first=Carol S. |chapter=Ancient Egyptian Rhetoric: It All Comes Down to Maat |editor-last2=Binkley |editor-first2=Roberta A.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lipson |first=Carol S. |title=Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks |publisher=State University of New York Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7914-6099-3 |editor-last=Lipson |editor-first=Carol S. |chapter=Ancient Egyptian Rhetoric: It All Comes Down to Maat |editor-last2=Binkley |editor-first2=Roberta A.}}
* {{Cite book |last=Martin |first=Henri-Jean |title=The History and Power of Writing |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-226-50836-8}}
* {{Cite book |last=Martin |first=Henri-Jean |title=The History and Power of Writing |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-226-50836-8}}
* {{Cite journal |first=Richard |last=Mattessich |year=2002 |title=The oldest writings, and inventory tags of Egypt |journal=Accounting Historians Journal |jstor=40698264 |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=195–208 |doi=10.2308/0148-4184.29.1.195 |s2cid=160704269}}
* {{Cite journal |first=Richard |last=Mattessich |year=2002 |title=The oldest writings, and inventory tags of Egypt |journal=Accounting Historians Journal |jstor=40698264 |volume=29 |issue=1 |pages=195–208 |doi=10.2308/0148-4184.29.1.195 |s2cid=160704269}}
Line 189: Line 197:
* {{Cite book |last=Powell |first=Barry B. |title=Writing: Theory and History of the Technology of Civilization |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |year=2009 |isbn=978-1-4051-6256-2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Powell |first=Barry B. |title=Writing: Theory and History of the Technology of Civilization |publisher=Wiley-Blackwell |year=2009 |isbn=978-1-4051-6256-2}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Ray |first=John D. |year=1986 |title=The Emergence of Writing in Egypt |journal=World Archaeology |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=307–316 |doi=10.1080/00438243.1986.9979972 |issn=0043-8243 |jstor=124697}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Ray |first=John D. |year=1986 |title=The Emergence of Writing in Egypt |journal=World Archaeology |volume=17 |issue=3 |pages=307–316 |doi=10.1080/00438243.1986.9979972 |issn=0043-8243 |jstor=124697}}
* {{Cite book |last=Robinson |first=Andrew |title=Communication in History: Technology, Culture, Society |publisher=Allyn & Bacon |year=2003 |editor-last=Crowley |editor-first=David |chapter=The Origins of Writing |editor-last2=Heyer |editor-first2=Paul}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rogers |first=Henry |title=Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach |publisher=Blackwell |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-631-23463-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Rogers |first=Henry |title=Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach |publisher=Blackwell |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-631-23463-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Reiter |first=Ehud |title=Building Natural Language Generation Systems |last2=Dale |first2=Robert |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-511-51985-7}}
* {{Cite book |last=Reiter |first=Ehud |title=Building Natural Language Generation Systems |last2=Dale |first2=Robert |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-0-511-51985-7}}
Line 212: Line 219:
* {{Cite book |last=Ankerl |first=Guy |title=Global Communication without Universal Civilization |publisher=INU Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-2-88155-004-1 |editor-last=Pereboom |editor-first=Dirk |series=INU societal research |volume=1: Coexisting Contemporary Civilizations – Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western |pages=59–66, 235}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ankerl |first=Guy |title=Global Communication without Universal Civilization |publisher=INU Press |year=2000 |isbn=978-2-88155-004-1 |editor-last=Pereboom |editor-first=Dirk |series=INU societal research |volume=1: Coexisting Contemporary Civilizations – Arabo-Muslim, Bharati, Chinese, and Western |pages=59–66, 235}}
* {{Cite book |last=Christin |first=Anne-Marie |title=A History of Writing: From Hieroglyph to Multimedia |last2=Bacon |first2=Josephine |publisher=Flammarion |year=2002 |isbn=978-2-08-010887-6}}
* {{Cite book |last=Christin |first=Anne-Marie |title=A History of Writing: From Hieroglyph to Multimedia |last2=Bacon |first2=Josephine |publisher=Flammarion |year=2002 |isbn=978-2-08-010887-6}}
* [http://www.museumofwriting.co.uk/ Museum of Writing] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060424070220/http://www.museumofwriting.co.uk/ |date=24 April 2006 }}: UK Museum of Writing with information on writing history and implements
* {{cite web|url=http://www.museumofwriting.co.uk/|publisher=Museum of Writing|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060424070220/http://www.museumofwriting.co.uk/ |archive-date=24 April 2006|title=UK Museum of Writing with information on writing history and implements}}
* {{Cite book |last=Robinson |first=Andrew |title=Writing and Script: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-19-956778-2 |series=Very Short Introductions}}
* {{Cite book |last=Robinson |first=Andrew |title=Writing and Script: A Very Short Introduction |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0-19-956778-2 |series=Very Short Introductions}}
* On ERIC Digests: [http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/writing.htm ''Writing Instruction: Current Practices in the Classroom''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054304/http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/writing.htm |date=4 March 2016 }}; [http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/development.htm ''Writing Development''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040415092322/http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/development.htm |date=15 April 2004 }}; [http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/views.htm ''Writing Instruction: Changing Views over the Years''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304052125/http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/views.htm |date=4 March 2016 }}
* On ERIC Digests: {{multiref|1=[http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/writing.htm ''Writing Instruction: Current Practices in the Classroom''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304054304/http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/writing.htm |date=4 March 2016 }}|2=[http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/development.htm ''Writing Development''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040415092322/http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/development.htm |date=15 April 2004 }}|3= [http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/views.htm ''Writing Instruction: Changing Views over the Years''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304052125/http://www.ericdigests.org/2001-3/views.htm |date=4 March 2016 }}}}
{{Refend}}
{{Refend}}



Revision as of 09:40, 13 June 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Template:Pp-pc Template:Use Oxford spelling Template:Use dmy dates

File:Rosetta Stone.JPG
The Rosetta Stone (196 BC) bears writing in three different scripts. Hieroglyphs (top) and Demotic (middle) record the same text in the Egyptian language, while an equivalent passage in Greek uses the Greek alphabet (bottom). These correspondences were key to the decipherment of Egyptian hieroglyphs in the early 19th century.

Writing is the act of creating a persistent representation of language. A writing system includes a particular set of symbols called a script, as well as the rules by which they encode a particular spoken language. Every written language arises from a corresponding spoken language; while the use of language is universal across human societies, most spoken languages are not written.Template:Sfnp

Writing is a cognitive and social activity involving neuropsychological and physical processes. The outcome of this activity, also called writing (or a text) is a series of physically inscribed, mechanically transferred, or digitally represented symbols. Reading is the corresponding process of interpreting a written text, with the interpreter referred to as a reader.Template:Sfnp

In general, writing systems do not constitute languages in and of themselves, but rather a means of encoding language such that it can be read by others across time and space.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp While not all languages use a writing system, those that do can complement and extend the capacities of spoken language by creating durable forms of language that can be transmitted across space (e.g. written correspondence) and stored over time (e.g. libraries).Template:Sfnp Writing can also impact what knowledge people acquire, since it allows humans to externalize their thinking in forms that are easier to reflect on, elaborate on, reconsider, and revise.Template:SfnpTemplate:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Tools, materials, and motivations to write

Any instance of writing involves a complex interaction among available tools, intentions, cultural customs, cognitive routines, genres, tacit and explicit knowledge, and the constraints and limitations of the systems used.Template:Sfnp Writing implements used to make physical inscriptions include fingers, styluses, ink brushes, pencils, pens, and many styles of lithography; writing surfaces on which inscriptions may be made include stone tablets, clay tablets, bamboo slips, papyrus, wax tablets, vellum, parchment, paper, copperplate, and slate.Template:Sfnpm

The typewriter, as well as the digital word processor, allow individual writers to produce visually consistent text mechanically via a keyboard.Template:Sfnp

Advancements in natural language processing and natural language generation have resulted in software capable of producing certain forms of formulaic writing (e.g. weather forecasts and sports reporting) without the direct involvement of humansTemplate:Sfnp after initial configuration or, more commonly, to be used to support writing processes such as generating initial drafts, producing feedback with the help of a rubric, copy-editing, and helping translation.Template:Sfnp

Motivations and purposes

File:Olin-Warner-LoC-tympanum-Highsmith.jpeg
A bronze tympanum featuring the personification of Writing, above the main entrance to the Thomas Jefferson Building in Washington, D.C., sculpted by Olin Levi Warner in 1896

Historically, writing emerged to address the needs of societies growing in economic and social complexity. Once developed, potential applications included tracking produce and other wealth, recording history, maintaining culture, codifying knowledge through curricula as well as lists of texts deemed to contain foundational knowledge (e.g. The Canon of Medicine) or artistic value (e.g. the literary canon). Aids to administration included legal codes, census records, contracts, deeds of ownership, taxation, trade agreements, and treaties. As Charles Bazerman explains, the "marking of signs on stones, clay, paper, and now digital memories—each more portable and rapidly traveling than the previous—provided means for increasingly coordinated and extended action as well as memory across larger groups of people over time and space."Template:Sfnp Further innovations included more uniform, predictable, and widely dispersed legal systems, the distribution of accessible versions of sacred texts, and furthering practices of scientific inquiry and knowledge management, all of which were largely reliant on portable and easily reproducible forms of inscribed language. The history of writing is co-extensive with uses of writing and the elaboration of activity systems that give rise to and circulate writing.Template:Sfnp

Individual motivations for writing include the ability to operate beyond the limitations of one's own memoryTemplate:Sfnp (e.g. to-do lists, recipes, reminders, logbooks, maps, the proper sequence for a complicated task or important ritual), dissemination of ideas and coordination (e.g. essays, monographs, broadsides, plans, petitions, or manifestos), creativity and storytelling, maintaining kinship and other social networks,Template:Sfnp business correspondence regarding goods and services, and life writing (e.g. a diary or journal).Template:Sfnp

The global spread of digital communication systems such as email and social media has made writing an increasingly important feature of daily life, where these systems mix with older technologies like paper, pencils, whiteboards, printers, and copiers.Template:Sfnp Substantial amounts of everyday writing characterize most workplaces in developed countries.Template:Sfnp In many occupations (e.g. law, accounting, software design, human resources), written documentation is not only the main deliverable but also the mode of work itself.Template:Sfnp Even in occupations not typically associated with writing, routine records management has most employees writing at least some of the time.Template:Sfnp

Contemporary uses

Some professions are typically associated with writing, such as literary authors, journalists, and technical writers, but writing is pervasive in most modern forms of work, civic participation, household management, and leisure activities.Template:Sfnp

Business and finance

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Writing permeates everyday commerce. For example, in the course of an afternoon, a wholesaler might receive a written inquiry about the availability of a product line, then communicate with suppliers and fabricators through work orders and purchase agreements, correspond via email to affirm shipping availability with a drayage company, write an invoice, and request proof of receipt in the form of a written signature. At a much larger scale, modern systems of finances, banking, and business rest on many forms of written documentsTemplate:Sndincluding written regulations, policies, and procedures; the creation of reports and other monitoring documents to make, evaluate, and provide accountability for decisions and operations; the creation and maintenance of records; internal written communications within departments to coordinate work; written communications that comprise work products presented to other departments and to clients; and external communications to clients and the public.Template:SfnpScript error: No such module "Unsubst".Template:SfnpScript error: No such module "Unsubst". Business and financial organizations also rely on many written legal documents, such as contracts, reports to government agencies, tax records, and accounting reports.Template:Sfnp Financial institutions and markets that hold, transmit, trade, insure, or regulate holdings for clients or other institutions are particularly dependent on written records (though now often in digital form) to maintain the integrity of their roles.Template:SfnpScript error: No such module "Unsubst".

Governance and law

Many modern systems of government are organized and sanctified through written constitutions at the national and sometimes state or other organizational levels. Written rules and procedures typically guide the operations of the various branches, departments, and other bodies of government, which regularly produce reports and other documents as work products and to account for their actions. In addition to legislatures that draft and pass laws, these laws are administered by an executive branch, which can present further written regulations specifying the laws and how they are carried out.Template:SfnpScript error: No such module "Unsubst". Governments at different levels also typically maintain written records on citizens concerning identities, life events such as births, deaths, marriages, and divorces, the granting of licenses for controlled activities, criminal charges, traffic offences, and other penalties small and large, and tax liability and payments.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Science and scholarship

Research undertaken in academic disciplines is typically published as articles in journals or within book-length monographs. Arguments, experiments, observational data, and other evidence collated in the course of research is represented in writing, and serves as the basis for later work. Data collection and drafting of manuscripts may be supported by grants, which usually require proposals establishing the value of such work and the need for funding.Template:Sfnp The data and procedures are also typically collected in lab notebooks or other preliminary files.Template:SfnpScript error: No such module "Unsubst". Preprints of potential publications may also be presented at academic or disciplinary conferences or on publicly accessible web servers to gain peer feedback and build interest in the work. Prior to official publication, these documents are typically read and evaluated by peer review from appropriate experts, who determine whether the work is of sufficient value and quality to be published.Template:Sfnp

Publication does not establish the claims or findings of work as being authoritatively true, only that they are worth the attention of other specialists. As the work appears in review articles, handbooks, textbooks, or other aggregations, and others cite it in the advancement of their own research, does it become codified as contingently reliable knowledge.Template:Sfnp

Journalism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

News and news reporting are central to citizen engagement and knowledge of many spheres of activity people may be interested in about the state of their community, including the actions and integrity of their governments and government officials, economic trends, natural disasters and responses to them, international geopolitical events, including conflicts, but also sports, entertainment, books, and other leisure activities. While news and newspapers have grown rapidly from the eighteenth to the twentieth centuries, the changing economics and ability to produce and distribute news have brought about radical and rapid challenges to journalism and the consequent organization of citizen knowledge and engagement.Template:SfnpTemplate:SfnpScript error: No such module "Unsubst". These changes have also created challenges for journalism ethics that have been developed over the past century.Template:Sfnp

Education and educational institutions

Formal education is the social context most strongly associated with the learning of writing, and students may carry these particular associations long after leaving school.Template:Sfnp Alongside the writing that students read (in the forms of textbooks, assigned books, and other instructional materials as well as self-selected books) students do much writing within schools at all levels, on subject exams, in essays, in taking notes, in doing homework, and in formative and summative assessments. Some of this is explicitly directed toward the learning of writing, but much is focused more on subject learning.Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Writing systems

Writing systems may be broadly classified according to what units of language are generally represented by its symbols:Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

Logographies

File:Comparative evolution of Cuneiform, Egyptian and Chinese characters.svg
Comparative evolution from pictograms to abstract shapes, in Mesopotamian cuneiforms, Egyptian hieroglyphs and Chinese characters

A logography is written using logogramsTemplate:Sndwritten characters which represent individual words or morphemes.Template:Sfnp Many logograms have internal structures, with components potentially representing both phonographic and ideographic (e.g. Chinese character radicals, hieroglyphic determinatives) aspects of the morpheme.Template:Sfnp

The main logographic system in use is Chinese characters, used primarily to write the Chinese languages and Japanese, and historically others from regions influenced by Chinese culture, such as Korean and Vietnamese. Other logographic systems include cuneiform and Maya script.Template:Sfnpm

Syllabaries

A syllabary is a set of written symbols that represent syllables,Template:Sfnp typically a consonant followed by a vowel, or just a vowel alone. In some scripts more complex syllables (e.g. consonant–vowel–consonant or consonant–consonant–vowel) may have dedicated glyphs. Phonetically similar syllables are not written similarly.Template:Sfnp

Syllabaries are best suited to languages with a relatively simple syllable structure, such as Japanese. Other syllabic scripts include Linear B and the Cherokee syllabary.Template:Sfnp

Alphabets

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". An alphabet is a set of written symbols that represent consonants and vowels.Template:Sfnp In a perfectly phonological alphabet, letters would correspond one-to-one with the language's phonemes. Thus, a writer could predict the spelling of a word given its pronunciation, and a speaker could predict the pronunciation of a word given its spelling. In practice, the degree to which letters correspond with phonemes varies greatly between languages and the orthographies used when writing them.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Abjads

Alphabets that generally only have letters for consonants are called abjads or consonantaries; though optional, abjads may also use diacritical marks to specify which vowels follow each consonant. The earliest alphabets were abjads, influenced by symbols representing specific consonants that originated in Egyptian hieroglyphs. Most abjads are likewise native to the Middle East, reflecting the relatively limited variation of vowels in the morphology of the Semitic languages spoken in the region.Template:Sfnp

Abugidas

In most of the alphabets of India and Southeast Asia, vowels are indicated through diacritics or modification of the shape of the consonant. These are called abugidas.Template:Sfnp Some abugidas, such as Geʽez and the Canadian Aboriginal syllabics, are learned by children as syllabaries, and so are often called "syllabics". However, unlike true syllabaries, there is not an independent glyph for each syllable.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

History and origins

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "redirect hatnote". Writing first emerged in the Early Bronze Age to meet the growing economic needs of the city-states of Sumeria, located in southern Mesopotamia. During this time, the complexity of trade and administration outgrew the power of memory, with Sumerian cuneiform serving as a reliable means for recording transactions, maintaining financial accounts, and keeping historical records, among similar activities.Template:Sfnp

Cuneiform, used to write the Sumerian language, was followed relatively quickly by Egyptian hieroglyphs, with both emerging from proto-writing systems between 3500 and 2900 BC,Template:Sfnp and the earliest coherent texts attested Template:Circa. While hieroglyphs lack any sign of being directly influenced by cuneiform in either form or function, the degree to which cultural diffusion from Mesopotamia, if any, played a part in the development of Egyptian writing is not universally agreed upon.

Mesopotamia

File:Accountancy clay envelope Louvre Sb1932.jpg
Globular envelope with a cluster of accountancy tokens, Uruk period, from SusaTemplate:SndLouvre Museum

Archaeologist Denise Schmandt-Besserat presented a theory establishing a link between cuneiform and previously uncategorized clay "tokens", the oldest of which have been found in the Zagros region of Iran. Around 8000 BC, Mesopotamians began using clay tokens to count their agricultural and manufactured goods. Later they began placing these tokens inside large, hollow clay containers (bulla, or globular envelopes) which were then sealed. The quantity of tokens in each container came to be expressed by impressing, on the container's surface, one picture for each instance of the token inside. They next dispensed with the tokens, relying solely on symbols for the tokens, drawn on clay surfaces. To avoid making a picture for each instance of the same object (for example: 100 pictures of a hat to represent 100 hats), they counted the objects by using various small marks.Template:Sfnp

Cuneiform emerged Template:Cx in the context of this technology for keeping accounts. By the end of the 4th millennium BC,Template:Sfnp the Mesopotamians were using a triangular-shaped stylus pressed into soft clay to record numbers. This system was gradually augmented with using a sharp stylus to indicate what was being counted by means of pictographs. Round and sharp styluses were gradually replaced for writing by wedge-shaped styluses (hence the term cuneiform, from Latin Script error: No such module "Lang". 'wedge')Template:Sndat first only for logograms, with phonetic elements introduced by the 29th century BC. Around 2700 BC, cuneiform began to represent syllables of spoken Sumerian. About that time, Mesopotamian cuneiform became a general purpose writing system for logograms, syllables, and numbers. This script was adapted to another Mesopotamian language, the East Semitic Akkadian (Assyrian and Babylonian) Template:Cx, and then to others such as Elamite, Hattian, Hurrian and Hittite. Scripts similar in appearance to this writing system include those for Ugaritic and Old Persian. With the adoption of Aramaic as the lingua franca of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (911–609 BC), Old Aramaic was also adapted to Mesopotamian cuneiform. The latest cuneiform texts in Akkadian discovered thus far date from the 1st century AD.Template:Sfnp

Egypt

File:Narmer Palette serpopard side.jpg
Narmer Palette, with the two Serpopards representing unification of Upper and Lower Egypt, Template:Cx

The earliest known hieroglyphs are clay labels for the Predynastic ruler "Scorpion I", dated Template:Cx and recovered at Abydos (modern Umm el-Qa'ab), or otherwise the Narmer Palette dated Template:Cx.Template:Sfnp The hieroglyphic script was logographic, with phonetic adjuncts that included an effective alphabet. The oldest deciphered sentence is attested on a seal impression from the tomb of Seth-Peribsen at Abydos, dating to the Second Dynasty (28th or 27th century BC). Around 800 hieroglyphs were used during the Old, Middle, and New Kingdom periods (2686–1077 BC); by the Greco-Roman period (30 BCTemplate:Snd642 AD), more than 5,000 distinct glyphs are attested.Template:Sfnp

Writing was very important in maintaining the Egyptian empire, and literacy was concentrated among an educated elite of scribes.Template:Sfnp Only people from certain backgrounds were allowed to train to become scribes, in the service of temple, pharaonic, and military authorities. The hieroglyph system was complex and difficult to master.

Alphabetic writing is only known to have been invented once in human history. Around the mid-19th century BC, the Proto-Sinaitic script emerged among a community of Canaanite turquoise miners in the Sinai Peninsula.Template:Sfnp Around 30 crude inscriptions have been found at a mountainous Egyptian mining site known as Serabit el-Khadem, with symbols that stood for single consonant sounds rather than whole words or conceptsTemplate:Sndthe basis of an alphabetic system. It was not until between the 12th and 9th centuries BC that use of the alphabet became widespread.Template:Sfnp

Mesoamerica

Of several pre-Columbian scripts in Mesoamerica, the one that appears to have been best developed, and the only one to be deciphered, is the Maya script. The earliest inscription identified as Maya dates to the 3rd century BC.Template:Sfnp Maya writing used logograms complemented by a set of syllabic glyphs, somewhat similar in function to modern Japanese writing.

China

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". The earliest surviving examples of writing in ChinaTemplate:Sndinscriptions on oracle bones, usually tortoise plastrons and ox scapulae which were used for divinationTemplate:Snddate from Template:Cx, during the Late Shang period. A small number of bronze inscriptions from the same period have also survived.Template:Sfnp

Elamite scripts

Over the centuries, three distinct Elamite scripts developed. Proto-Elamite is the oldest known writing system from Iran. In use Template:Cx, clay tablets with Proto-Elamite writing have been found at different sites across Iran, with the majority having been excavated at Susa, an ancient city located east of the Tigris and between the Karkheh and Dez rivers.Template:Sfnp The Proto-Elamite script is thought to have developed from early cuneiform (proto-cuneiform). The Proto-Elamite script consists of more than 1,000 signs and is thought to be partly logographic. The Elamite cuneiform script was used from Template:Cx to 331 BC, and was adapted from the Akkadian cuneiform. At any given point within this period, the Elamite cuneiform script consisted of about 130 symbols, and over this entire period only 206 total signs were used. This is far fewer than most other cuneiform scripts.Template:Sfnp

Europe

Crete and Greece

Cretan hieroglyphs are attested on artefacts from Crete during the early-to-mid 2nd millennium BC (MM I–III, overlapping with Linear A from MM IIA at the earliest). Linear B, the writing system of the Mycenaean Greeks,Template:Sfnp has been deciphered while Linear A has yet to be deciphered. The sequence and the geographical spread of the three overlapping, but distinct writing systems can be summarized as follows (beginning date refers to first attestations, the assumed origins of all scripts lie further back in the past): Cretan hieroglyphs were used in Crete Template:Cx; Linear A was used in the Aegean Islands, and the Greek mainland Template:Cx; Linear B was used in Crete (Knossos), and the mainland Template:Cx.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Development of the alphabet

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The first alphabetic writing was developed by workers in the Sinai Peninsula to write West Semitic languages Template:Circa, "in the context of cultural exchanges between Semitic-speaking people from the Levant and communities in Egypt".Template:Sfnp This earliest attested form is known as the Proto-Sinaitic script, and it adapted concepts and at least some of its written letterforms from Egyptian hieroglyphic writing; it adopted wholly West Semitic sound values for its letters, as opposed to adapting existing Egyptian ones.Template:Sfnpm Precise dating of its origin, as well as the graphical origins of many letterforms (if any) remain unclear, and the script remains undeciphered.Template:Sfnpm

The Phoenician alphabet (Template:Circa) is a direct descendant of Proto-Sinaitic. Proto-Sinaitic and Phoenician were abjads which only had letters representing consonantal sounds; Phoenician was ultimately adapted into the Greek alphabet (Template:Cx), the first to represent vowel sounds, which it did by re-purposing unused Phoenician consonantal signs.Template:Sfnp The Cumae alphabet, a variant of the early Greek alphabet, gave rise to the Etruscan alphabet and its own descendants, such as the Latin alphabet. Other descendants from the Greek alphabet include Cyrillic, used to write Bulgarian and Russian, among other languages. The Phoenician alphabet was also adapted into the Aramaic script, from which the Hebrew and the Arabic scripts are descended.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Religious texts

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In the history of writing, religious texts or writing have played a special role. For example, some religious text compilations have been some of the earliest popular texts, or even the only written texts in some languages, and in some cases are still highly popular around the world.Template:SfnpScript error: No such module "Unsubst".Template:SfnpTemplate:Sfnp

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

References

Template:Bots Template:CS1 config Template:Reflist

Works cited

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

Further reading

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • On ERIC Digests: Template:Multiref

Template:Refend

External links

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

Template:Writing Template:Paper data storage media Template:Communication studies Template:Literacy Template:Authority control