Inner Asia: Difference between revisions
Fixed. |
imported>ClueBot NG m Reverting possible vandalism by ~2025-37461-28 to version by Bearcat. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (4454757) (Bot) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{Multiple image | {{Multiple image | ||
| image2 = Map of Inner Asia (CIAS).svg | | image2 = Map of Inner Asia (CIAS).svg | ||
| caption2 = Map of Inner Asia, showing the extent of the area studied by the CIAS at the [[University of Toronto]] | | caption2 = Map of Inner Asia, showing the extent of the area studied by the CIAS at the [[University of Toronto]] | ||
| image1 = Map of Inner Asia (SRI).svg | | image1 = Map of Inner Asia (SRI).svg | ||
| caption1 = Map of Inner Asia, showing the extent of the area studied by the Sinor Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, located at [[Indiana University]] in the United States | | caption1 = Map of Inner Asia, showing the extent of the area studied by the Sinor Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies, located at [[Indiana University]] in the United States | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Inner Asia''' refers to the northern and [[landlock]]ed regions spanning [[North Asia|North]], [[Central Asia|Central]], and [[East Asia]]. It includes parts of [[Western China|western]] and [[northeast China]], as well as southern [[Siberia]]. The area overlaps with some definitions of "Central Asia", mostly the historical ones, but certain regions that are often included in Inner Asia, such as [[Manchuria]], are not a part of Central Asia by any of its definitions. Inner Asia may be regarded as the western and northern "frontier" of [[China proper]] and as being bounded by East Asia proper, which consists of China proper, Japan and Korea.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://japanfocus.org/-Uradyn_E_-Bulag/1557|title=Where is East Asia?: Central Asian and Inner Asian Perspectives on Regionalism|first=Uradyn E.|last=Bulag|publisher=Japan Focus|date=October 2005|access-date=2012-12-09|archive-date=2015-04-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402064332/http://japanfocus.org/-Uradyn_E_-Bulag/1557|url-status=dead}}</ref> | '''Inner Asia''' refers to the northern and [[landlock]]ed regions spanning [[North Asia|North]], [[Central Asia|Central]], and [[East Asia]]. It includes parts of [[Western China|western]] and [[northeast China]], as well as southern [[Siberia]]. The area overlaps with some definitions of "[[Central Asia]]", mostly the historical ones, but certain regions that are often included in Inner Asia, such as [[Manchuria]], are not a part of Central Asia by any of its definitions. Inner Asia may be regarded as the western and northern "frontier" of [[China proper]] and as being bounded by East Asia proper, which consists of China proper, Japan, and Korea.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://japanfocus.org/-Uradyn_E_-Bulag/1557|title=Where is East Asia?: Central Asian and Inner Asian Perspectives on Regionalism|first=Uradyn E.|last=Bulag|publisher=Japan Focus|date=October 2005|access-date=2012-12-09|archive-date=2015-04-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402064332/http://japanfocus.org/-Uradyn_E_-Bulag/1557|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
The extent of Inner Asia has been understood differently in different periods. "Inner Asia" is sometimes contrasted to "China proper", that is, the territories originally unified under the [[Qin dynasty]] with majority [[Han Chinese|Han]] populations. By the year 1800, Chinese Inner Asia consisted of four main areas, namely [[Manchuria]] (modern [[Northeast China]] and [[Outer Manchuria]]), the [[Mongolian Plateau]] ([[Inner Mongolia]] and [[Outer Mongolia]]), [[Xinjiang]] ([[Chinese Turkestan]] or [[East Turkestan]]), and [[Tibet]]. Many of these areas had been only recently conquered by the [[Qing dynasty]] of China and, during most of the Qing period, they were governed through administrative structures different from those of the older Chinese provinces.<ref>The Cambridge History of China: Volume 10, Part 1, by John K. Fairbank, p37</ref> A Qing government agency, the [[Lifan Yuan]], supervised [[Qing dynasty in Inner Asia|the empire's Inner Asian regions]], also known as [[Chinese Tartary]]. The frontier regions of China proper—[[Gansu]], [[Qinghai]], [[Sichuan]] and [[Yunnan]]—are also sometimes included as part of Inner Asia.<ref name="harvard">{{cite web |url=https://iaas.fas.harvard.edu/ |title=The Committee on Inner Asian and Altaic Studies |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=harvard.edu |access-date=8 November 2024}}</ref><ref name="cambridge">{{cite web |url=https://www.miasu.socanth.cam.ac.uk/about-us |title=Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit: About us |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=miasu.socanth.cam.ac.uk |access-date=8 November 2024}}</ref> | The extent of Inner Asia has been understood differently in different periods. "Inner Asia" is sometimes contrasted to "China proper", that is, the territories originally unified under the [[Qin dynasty]] with majority [[Han Chinese|Han]] populations. By the year 1800, Chinese Inner Asia consisted of four main areas, namely [[Manchuria]] (modern [[Northeast China]] and [[Outer Manchuria]]), the [[Mongolian Plateau]] ([[Inner Mongolia]] and [[Outer Mongolia]]), [[Xinjiang]] ([[Chinese Turkestan]] or [[East Turkestan]]), and [[Tibet]]. Many of these areas had been only recently conquered by the [[Qing dynasty]] of China and, during most of the Qing period, they were governed through administrative structures different from those of the older Chinese provinces.<ref>The Cambridge History of China: Volume 10, Part 1, by John K. Fairbank, p37</ref> A Qing government agency, the [[Lifan Yuan]], supervised [[Qing dynasty in Inner Asia|the empire's Inner Asian regions]], also known as [[Chinese Tartary]]. The frontier regions of China proper—[[Gansu]], [[Qinghai]], [[Sichuan]], and [[Yunnan]]—are also sometimes included as part of Inner Asia.<ref name="harvard">{{cite web |url=https://iaas.fas.harvard.edu/ |title=The Committee on Inner Asian and Altaic Studies |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=harvard.edu |access-date=8 November 2024}}</ref><ref name="cambridge">{{cite web |url=https://www.miasu.socanth.cam.ac.uk/about-us |title=Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit: About us |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=miasu.socanth.cam.ac.uk |access-date=8 November 2024}}</ref> | ||
==Definition and usage== | ==Definition and usage== | ||
[[File:Map of Inner Asia (MONDEA).svg|thumb|316x316px|Alternative conception of Inner Asia showing the Mongolian (or Mongolian-related) areas of Inner Asia that are represented in the Mongolian Digital Ethnography Archive]] | [[File:Map of Inner Asia (MONDEA).svg|thumb|316x316px|Alternative conception of Inner Asia showing the Mongolian (or Mongolian-related) areas of Inner Asia that are represented in the Mongolian Digital Ethnography Archive.]] | ||
"Inner Asia" today has a range of definitions and usages.<ref>[http://www.stormingmedia.us/17/1794/A179414.html Book Abstract: "Inner Asia: Making a Long-Term U.S. Commitment."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604153258/http://www.stormingmedia.us/17/1794/A179414.html |date=2011-06-04 }} Authors: Carol D. Clair; Army War Coll Carlisle Barracks Pa. Retrieved: 22 August 2009.</ref> [[Denis Sinor]], for example, used "Inner Asia" in contrast to [[agricultural]] civilizations, noting its changing borders, such as when a Roman province was taken by the Huns, areas of [[North China]] were occupied by the [[Mongols]], or [[Anatolia]] came under [[Turkification|Turkish influence]], eradicating [[Hellenistic]] culture.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ST6TRNuWmHsC&pg=PA3 The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Volume 1 By Denis Sinor.] Retrieved: 22 August 2009.</ref> | "Inner Asia" today has a range of definitions and usages.<ref>[http://www.stormingmedia.us/17/1794/A179414.html Book Abstract: "Inner Asia: Making a Long-Term U.S. Commitment."] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604153258/http://www.stormingmedia.us/17/1794/A179414.html |date=2011-06-04 }} Authors: Carol D. Clair; Army War Coll Carlisle Barracks Pa. Retrieved: 22 August 2009.</ref> [[Denis Sinor]], for example, used "Inner Asia" in contrast to [[agricultural]] civilizations, noting its changing borders, such as when a Roman province was taken by the Huns, areas of [[North China]] were occupied by the [[Mongols]], or [[Anatolia]] came under [[Turkification|Turkish influence]], eradicating [[Hellenistic]] culture.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=ST6TRNuWmHsC&pg=PA3 The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Volume 1 By Denis Sinor.] Retrieved: 22 August 2009.</ref> | ||
Scholars or historians of the [[Qing dynasty]], such as those who compiled the [[New Qing History]], often use the term "Inner Asia" when studying Qing interests or reigns outside [[China proper]],<ref>''New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde'', ed. Ruth W. Dunnell, [[Mark C. Elliott]], Philippe Foret and James A. Millward</ref> although previous [[Dynasties of China|Chinese dynasties]] like the [[Han dynasty]], [[Tang dynasty]] and [[Ming dynasty]] also expanded their realms and influences into Inner Asia. | Scholars or historians of the [[Qing dynasty]], such as those who compiled the [[New Qing History]], often use the term "Inner Asia" when studying Qing interests or reigns outside [[China proper]],<ref>''New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde'', ed. Ruth W. Dunnell, [[Mark C. Elliott]], Philippe Foret and James A. Millward</ref> although previous [[Dynasties of China|Chinese dynasties]] like the [[Han dynasty|Han]], [[Tang dynasty|Tang]], and [[Ming dynasty|Ming dynasties]] also expanded their realms and influences into Inner Asia. | ||
According to [[Morris Rossabi]], Inner Asia is composed not only of the five [[Central Asian]] countries, which includes [[Turkmenistan]], [[Uzbekistan]], [[Tajikistan]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], and [[Kazakhstan]], but also includes [[Afghanistan]], [[Xinjiang]], [[Mongolia]], [[Manchuria]], and parts of [[Iran]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rossabi |first=Morris |title=Central Asia: A Historical Overview |journal=Asia Society}}</ref> | According to [[Morris Rossabi]], Inner Asia is composed not only of the five [[Central Asian]] countries, which includes [[Turkmenistan]], [[Uzbekistan]], [[Tajikistan]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], and [[Kazakhstan]], but also includes [[Afghanistan]], [[Xinjiang]], [[Mongolia]], [[Manchuria]], and parts of [[Iran]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rossabi |first=Morris |title=Central Asia: A Historical Overview |journal=Asia Society}}</ref> | ||
The Committee on Inner Asian and Altaic Studies of [[Harvard University]] defines Inner Asia as a region consisting of [[Russian | The Committee on Inner Asian and Altaic Studies of [[Harvard University]] defines Inner Asia as a region consisting of [[Russian Turkestan]], [[Xinjiang]], [[Eastern Iran]], [[Northern Pakistan]], Afghanistan, [[Tibet]], [[Qinghai]], [[Sichuan]], [[Gansu]], and northwestern [[Yunnan]].<ref name="harvard" /> | ||
The Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit at the [[University of Cambridge]] defines Inner Asia as "an area centred on Mongolia and extending across the region of [[Eurasian Steppe|the great steppes]] to the [[Himalayas]]", including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, | The Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit at the [[University of Cambridge]] defines Inner Asia as "an area centred on Mongolia and extending across the region of [[Eurasian Steppe|the great steppes]] to the [[Himalayas]]", including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Sichuan, Yunnan, [[Nepal]], [[Sikkim]], [[Bhutan]], [[Inner Mongolia]], [[Liaoning]], [[Jilin]], [[Heilongjiang]], [[Altai Republic|Altai]], [[Tuva]], [[Buryatia]], and [[Chita Oblast|Chita]].<ref name="cambridge" /> | ||
==In other languages== | ==In other languages== | ||
In [[French language|French]], {{lang|fr|Asie centrale}} can mean either "Central Asia" or "Inner Asia", while Mongolia and Tibet are grouped as {{lang|fr|Haute Asie}} ({{literal translation|Upper Asia}}).<ref name="auto">{{cite web |url=http://www.indiana.edu/~rifias/RIFIAS_and_Inner_Asian_Studies.htm |title=Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (RIFIAS) |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=[[Indiana University|indiana.edu]] |access-date=22 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090312102845/http://www.indiana.edu/~rifias/RIFIAS_and_Inner_Asian_Studies.htm |archive-date=12 March 2009}}</ref> | In [[French language|French]], {{lang|fr|Asie centrale}} can mean either "Central Asia" or "Inner Asia", while Mongolia and Tibet are grouped as {{lang|fr|Haute Asie}} ({{literal translation|Upper Asia}}).<ref name="auto">{{cite web |url=http://www.indiana.edu/~rifias/RIFIAS_and_Inner_Asian_Studies.htm |title=Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (RIFIAS) |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=<!--Not stated--> |website=[[Indiana University|indiana.edu]] |access-date=22 August 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090312102845/http://www.indiana.edu/~rifias/RIFIAS_and_Inner_Asian_Studies.htm |archive-date=12 March 2009}}</ref> | ||
The terms meaning "Inner Asia" in the languages of Inner Asia itself are all modern translations of terms in European languages, mostly Russian.<ref name="auto" /> | The terms meaning "Inner Asia" in the languages of Inner Asia itself are all modern translations of terms in European languages, mostly [[Russian language|Russian]].<ref name="auto" /> | ||
==Related terms== | ==Related terms== | ||
| Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
===Central Asia=== | ===Central Asia=== | ||
{{Main|Central Asia}} | {{Main|Central Asia}} | ||
{{ | {{See also|Soviet Central Asia|Greater Central Asia}} | ||
"[[Central Asia]]" normally denotes the western part of Inner Asia; that is, [[Kazakhstan]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], [[Tajikistan]], [[Turkmenistan]], and [[Uzbekistan]], with [[Afghanistan]] sometimes also included as part of Central Asia. However, [[ | "[[Central Asia]]" normally denotes the western part of Inner Asia; that is, [[Kazakhstan]], [[Kyrgyzstan]], [[Tajikistan]], [[Turkmenistan]], and [[Uzbekistan]], with [[Afghanistan]] sometimes also included as part of Central Asia. However, the [[Library of Congress]]' subject classification system treats "Central Asia" and Inner Asia as synonymous.<ref name="auto"/> | ||
===Central Eurasia=== | ===Central Eurasia=== | ||
Historian [[Morris Rossabi]] posits that the "Inner Asia" is the established term for the area in relevant literature. Historian [[Denis Sinor]] believed the term was deficient, particularly as it implies an "Outer Asia" that in fact has no agreed-upon meaning or common usage. As an alternative, Sinor proposed the [[neologism]] "Central [[Eurasia]]" to emphasize the region's history in transcontinental exchange, e.g., as territories of the [[Silk Road]].<ref>{{cite book|title=China and Inner Asia: from 1368 to the present day|first=Morris|last=Rossabi|publisher=Pica Press|year=1975|page=10}}</ref> According to Sinor:<ref>{{cite book|title=Inner Asia: History, civilization, languages: a syllabus|first=Denis|last=Sinor|author-link=Denis Sinor|year=1997|page=4}}</ref> | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote>The definition that can be given of Central Eurasia in space is negative. It is that part of the continent of Eurasia that lies beyond the borders of the great sedentary civilizations.... Although the area of Central Eurasia is subject to fluctuations, the general trend is that of diminution. With the territorial growth of the sedentary civilizations, their borderline extends and offers a larger surface on which new layers of barbarians will be deposited.</blockquote> | ||
The definition that can be given of Central Eurasia in space is negative. It is that part of the continent of Eurasia that lies beyond the borders of the great sedentary civilizations.... Although the area of Central Eurasia is subject to fluctuations, the general trend is that of diminution. With the territorial growth of the sedentary civilizations, their borderline extends and offers a larger surface on which new layers of barbarians will be deposited. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
== Origin of Inner Asian studies == | ==Origin of Inner Asian studies== | ||
[[File:Fernen Osten.png|thumb|200px|[[Gustav Kreitner]], [[Béla Széchenyi]] and [[Lajos Lóczy]] led an expedition to Inner Asia in 1877–1880.]] | [[File:Fernen Osten.png|thumb|200px|[[Gustav Kreitner]], [[Béla Széchenyi]], and [[Lajos Lóczy]] led an expedition to Inner Asia in 1877–1880.]] | ||
[[ | [[Central Europe]] is the birthplace of Inner Asian studies in the [[Western world|West]]. [[Hungary|Hungarian]] explorers and scholars of the early 19th century traveled to Inner Asia with an attempt to uncover their own [[Hungarian prehistory|Magyar prehistory]]. The linguist [[Sándor Kőrösi Csoma]] (1784 – 1842) was the first among these explorers; he later became a founder of [[Tibetology]]. Count [[Béla Széchenyi]] led a scientific expedition to Inner Asia in 1877–1880; he later founded the [[Hungarian language|Hungarian]] journal ''[[Turán (periodical)|Turán]]'' in 1913. The term "Inner Asian studies" ({{langx|hu|belső-ázsiai kutatások|link=no}}; {{langx|de|innerasiatische Studien|link=no}}) first appeared in the masthead of ''Turán''.<ref name="auto" /> The periodical's name refers to the [[historical region]] in Central Asia known as [[Turan]]. | ||
In the first two decades of the 20th century, Hungarian-British archaeologist [[Aurel Stein]] made important discoveries over the course of his four expeditions to Inner Asia. In 1928, Stein published ''Innermost Asia: Detailed Report of Explorations in Central Asia, Kan-su and Eastern Iran, Carried Out and Described under the Orders of H.M. Indian Government'' in four volumes. In 1940, the first academic chair for Inner Asian studies was established by the Hungarian [[Oriental studies|Orientalist]] and linguist [[Lajos Ligeti]] at the [[Eötvös Loránd University|University of Budapest]].<ref name="auto" /> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Div col|colwidth=20em}} | {{Div col|colwidth=20em}} | ||
* [[Western Regions]] | |||
* [[Nomadic empire]] | |||
*[[Western Regions]] | * [[Eurasianism]] | ||
*[[Nomadic empire]] | * [[Indo-Pacific Asia]], the rest of Asia | ||
*[[Eurasianism]] | * [[Pan-Mongolism]] | ||
*[[Indo-Pacific Asia]], the rest of Asia | * [[Turco-Mongol]]s | ||
*[[Pan-Mongolism]] | * [[Turanism]] | ||
*[[ | * [[Tartary]] | ||
*[[ | * [[Division of the Mongol Empire]] | ||
*[[ | * [[Southern Russia]] | ||
*[[ | * [[North Russia]] | ||
*[[ | * [[Yuan dynasty in Inner Asia]] | ||
*[[ | * [[History of Manchuria]] | ||
*[[ | * [[History of Mongolia]] | ||
* [[History of Tibet]] | |||
* [[History of Xinjiang]] | |||
{{Div col end}} | |||
=== | ==References== | ||
===Citations=== | |||
=== Citations === | |||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
=== Sources === | ===Sources=== | ||
{{refbegin}} | {{refbegin}} | ||
* Di Cosmo, Nicola. 1999. "State Formation and Periodization in Inner Asian History". ''Journal of World History'' 10 (1). University of Hawai'i Press: 1–40. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/20078749 State Formation and Periodization in Inner Asian History]. | * Di Cosmo, Nicola. 1999. "State Formation and Periodization in Inner Asian History". ''Journal of World History'' 10 (1). University of Hawai'i Press: 1–40. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/20078749 State Formation and Periodization in Inner Asian History]. | ||
| Line 92: | Line 80: | ||
{{refend}} | {{refend}} | ||
== External links == | ==External links== | ||
*[http://www.aasianst.org/councils/CIAC.htm The Association for Asian Studies (AAS): The China and Inner Asia Council (CIAC).] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102214631/http://www.aasianst.org/councils/CIAC.htm |date=2021-11-02 }} | * [http://www.aasianst.org/councils/CIAC.htm The Association for Asian Studies (AAS): The China and Inner Asia Council (CIAC).] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211102214631/http://www.aasianst.org/councils/CIAC.htm |date=2021-11-02 }} | ||
*[http://www.indiana.edu/~rifias/RIFIAS_and_Inner_Asian_Studies.htm Indiana University at Bloomington: Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (RIFIAS).] | * [http://www.indiana.edu/~rifias/RIFIAS_and_Inner_Asian_Studies.htm Indiana University at Bloomington: Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (RIFIAS).] | ||
*[https://www.miasu.socanth.cam.ac.uk/ University of Cambridge: Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit (MIASU).] | * [https://www.miasu.socanth.cam.ac.uk/ University of Cambridge: Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit (MIASU).] | ||
{{Inner Asia}} | {{Inner Asia}} | ||
| Line 104: | Line 92: | ||
[[Category:Regions of Asia]] | [[Category:Regions of Asia]] | ||
[[Category:Natural history of Asia]] | [[Category:Natural history of Asia]] | ||
[[Category:Historical regions]] | [[Category:Historical regions of Asia]] | ||
Latest revision as of 04:18, 30 November 2025
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Multiple image".
Inner Asia refers to the northern and landlocked regions spanning North, Central, and East Asia. It includes parts of western and northeast China, as well as southern Siberia. The area overlaps with some definitions of "Central Asia", mostly the historical ones, but certain regions that are often included in Inner Asia, such as Manchuria, are not a part of Central Asia by any of its definitions. Inner Asia may be regarded as the western and northern "frontier" of China proper and as being bounded by East Asia proper, which consists of China proper, Japan, and Korea.[1]
The extent of Inner Asia has been understood differently in different periods. "Inner Asia" is sometimes contrasted to "China proper", that is, the territories originally unified under the Qin dynasty with majority Han populations. By the year 1800, Chinese Inner Asia consisted of four main areas, namely Manchuria (modern Northeast China and Outer Manchuria), the Mongolian Plateau (Inner Mongolia and Outer Mongolia), Xinjiang (Chinese Turkestan or East Turkestan), and Tibet. Many of these areas had been only recently conquered by the Qing dynasty of China and, during most of the Qing period, they were governed through administrative structures different from those of the older Chinese provinces.[2] A Qing government agency, the Lifan Yuan, supervised the empire's Inner Asian regions, also known as Chinese Tartary. The frontier regions of China proper—Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan, and Yunnan—are also sometimes included as part of Inner Asia.[3][4]
Definition and usage
"Inner Asia" today has a range of definitions and usages.[5] Denis Sinor, for example, used "Inner Asia" in contrast to agricultural civilizations, noting its changing borders, such as when a Roman province was taken by the Huns, areas of North China were occupied by the Mongols, or Anatolia came under Turkish influence, eradicating Hellenistic culture.[6]
Scholars or historians of the Qing dynasty, such as those who compiled the New Qing History, often use the term "Inner Asia" when studying Qing interests or reigns outside China proper,[7] although previous Chinese dynasties like the Han, Tang, and Ming dynasties also expanded their realms and influences into Inner Asia.
According to Morris Rossabi, Inner Asia is composed not only of the five Central Asian countries, which includes Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan, but also includes Afghanistan, Xinjiang, Mongolia, Manchuria, and parts of Iran.[8]
The Committee on Inner Asian and Altaic Studies of Harvard University defines Inner Asia as a region consisting of Russian Turkestan, Xinjiang, Eastern Iran, Northern Pakistan, Afghanistan, Tibet, Qinghai, Sichuan, Gansu, and northwestern Yunnan.[3]
The Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit at the University of Cambridge defines Inner Asia as "an area centred on Mongolia and extending across the region of the great steppes to the Himalayas", including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang, Tibet, Qinghai, Gansu, Sichuan, Yunnan, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, Inner Mongolia, Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Altai, Tuva, Buryatia, and Chita.[4]
In other languages
In French, Script error: No such module "Lang". can mean either "Central Asia" or "Inner Asia", while Mongolia and Tibet are grouped as Script error: No such module "Lang". (Template:Literal translation).[9]
The terms meaning "Inner Asia" in the languages of Inner Asia itself are all modern translations of terms in European languages, mostly Russian.[9]
Related terms
Central Asia
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
"Central Asia" normally denotes the western part of Inner Asia; that is, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, with Afghanistan sometimes also included as part of Central Asia. However, the Library of Congress' subject classification system treats "Central Asia" and Inner Asia as synonymous.[9]
Central Eurasia
Historian Morris Rossabi posits that the "Inner Asia" is the established term for the area in relevant literature. Historian Denis Sinor believed the term was deficient, particularly as it implies an "Outer Asia" that in fact has no agreed-upon meaning or common usage. As an alternative, Sinor proposed the neologism "Central Eurasia" to emphasize the region's history in transcontinental exchange, e.g., as territories of the Silk Road.[10] According to Sinor:[11]
The definition that can be given of Central Eurasia in space is negative. It is that part of the continent of Eurasia that lies beyond the borders of the great sedentary civilizations.... Although the area of Central Eurasia is subject to fluctuations, the general trend is that of diminution. With the territorial growth of the sedentary civilizations, their borderline extends and offers a larger surface on which new layers of barbarians will be deposited.
Origin of Inner Asian studies
Central Europe is the birthplace of Inner Asian studies in the West. Hungarian explorers and scholars of the early 19th century traveled to Inner Asia with an attempt to uncover their own Magyar prehistory. The linguist Sándor Kőrösi Csoma (1784 – 1842) was the first among these explorers; he later became a founder of Tibetology. Count Béla Széchenyi led a scientific expedition to Inner Asia in 1877–1880; he later founded the Hungarian journal Turán in 1913. The term "Inner Asian studies" (Template:Langx; Template:Langx) first appeared in the masthead of Turán.[9] The periodical's name refers to the historical region in Central Asia known as Turan.
In the first two decades of the 20th century, Hungarian-British archaeologist Aurel Stein made important discoveries over the course of his four expeditions to Inner Asia. In 1928, Stein published Innermost Asia: Detailed Report of Explorations in Central Asia, Kan-su and Eastern Iran, Carried Out and Described under the Orders of H.M. Indian Government in four volumes. In 1940, the first academic chair for Inner Asian studies was established by the Hungarian Orientalist and linguist Lajos Ligeti at the University of Budapest.[9]
See also
<templatestyles src="Div col/styles.css"/>
References
Citations
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ The Cambridge History of China: Volume 10, Part 1, by John K. Fairbank, p37
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Book Abstract: "Inner Asia: Making a Long-Term U.S. Commitment." Template:Webarchive Authors: Carol D. Clair; Army War Coll Carlisle Barracks Pa. Retrieved: 22 August 2009.
- ↑ The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia, Volume 1 By Denis Sinor. Retrieved: 22 August 2009.
- ↑ New Qing Imperial History: The Making of Inner Asian Empire at Qing Chengde, ed. Ruth W. Dunnell, Mark C. Elliott, Philippe Foret and James A. Millward
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d e Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Sources
<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />
- Di Cosmo, Nicola. 1999. "State Formation and Periodization in Inner Asian History". Journal of World History 10 (1). University of Hawai'i Press: 1–40. State Formation and Periodization in Inner Asian History.
- Rogers, J. Daniel. 2012. "Inner Asian States and Empires: Theories and Synthesis". Journal of Archaeological Research 20 (3). Springer: 205–56. Inner Asian States and Empires: Theories and Synthesis.
External links
- The Association for Asian Studies (AAS): The China and Inner Asia Council (CIAC). Template:Webarchive
- Indiana University at Bloomington: Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (RIFIAS).
- University of Cambridge: Mongolia and Inner Asia Studies Unit (MIASU).
Template:Inner Asia Template:Region topics Template:Regions of Asia