Support either as nominator with preference to edited version --Muhammad(talk) 06:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment Lacks information on what edits were performed. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 10:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
NS, can you please provide the information? Muhammad(talk) 13:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
It was a levels and sharpen (look at peer review), its in the retouched tag now. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Weak Oppose - The background really gets to me. It's both distracting and sometimes difficult to discern from the flower. I would support this as a VP though. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 22:03, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment Seems a bit darkly-lit. Maybe a levels adjustment would help pull this up to FP quality? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:30, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
The original (edited version) had a levels adjustment done --Muhammad(talk) 05:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Regretful oppose bright section at upper right throws off the levels. Otherwise excellent. DurovaCharge! 05:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Question Is the stalk really that bare or are the stumps on it the remnants of leaves? --Fir0002 08:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
When the flowers begins to bloom, there are several of them together in clusters. Most of the flowers fall down before complete maturity. The stumps are remnants of flowers. --Muhammad(talk) 09:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
