Victoria Viaduct
Template:Use dmy dates Template:Use British English
Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Victoria Viaduct, originally known as the Victoria Bridge, is a stone arch rail viaduct spanning the River Wear about Script error: No such module "convert". south-east of Washington in the City of Sunderland North East England. It was built as part of the Durham Junction Railway under the supervision of Thomas Elliot Harrison.
History and design
The bridge was constructed as part of the Durham Junction Railway, which had been sanctioned by act of parliament in 1834; the act allowed for traffic tolls on a bridge over the Wear, including tolls for road and foot crossing.Template:Sfn A Script error: No such module "convert". iron bridge suitable for passage by rail, foot and road vehicle was designed by John Green of Newcastle, but instead a stone arch bridge designed by James Walker was chosen.Template:Sfn The contract to build the bridge was given to John Gibb & Son. of Aberdeen.Template:Sfn
The design was based upon the Alcántara Bridge in Spain. Construction began 17 March 1836 and was completed on 28 June 1838, the date of the coronation of Queen Victoria; as a result it was called 'Victoria Bridge'. The cost of construction was £40,338 5s. 10d.Template:Sfn[note 1]
The bridge is Template:Cvt in length and Template:Cvt in width, with a height above water level of the top point of the arches of approximately Script error: No such module "convert". It was constructed entirely of locally quarried Penshaw sandstone, excluding the quoins stones of the main arches, made of aberdeen granite.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The viaduct carried a double track railway, and had a walkway on either side for pedestrians.Template:Sfn
The main arches had spans of Script error: No such module "convert".; Script error: No such module "convert".; Script error: No such module "convert".; and Script error: No such module "convert".. At either end of the viaduct were sets of three smaller spans of Script error: No such module "convert"..[note 2] The main arches were semicircular with the exception of the main 160 ft span, which was a circular segment, spanning 160 ft with a rise of 72 ft. The three main piers and one of the arch abutments were founded on bedrock, the river pier required excavation to a depth of Script error: No such module "convert". below the river bed to obtain that footing. One arch abutment was founded on Script error: No such module "convert". long, Script error: No such module "convert". diameter scotch fir piles, spaced at Script error: No such module "convert".. Above the first Script error: No such module "convert". the piers contained voids to minimise mass.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn[note 3]
The bridge and line opened in August 1838.Template:Sfn As built it was one of the largest bridges in Europe, being exceeded in arch length by the River Dee bridge at Chester, and in height by the Alcántara bridge, but not by other structures in both dimensions.[2]
Scheduled passenger trains on the line and viaduct ceased in 1964 following the Beeching Axe. The bridge continued to carry freight, and was renovated in 1989/90. Diverted passenger trains also used it occasionally, especially while the East Coast Main Line was being electrified. After closure of the freight terminal at Follingsby in 1991 the line and bridge were mothballed.[3] The structure was grade II* listed in 1985.[4]
Future
The proposed Tyne and Wear Metro Washington extension would use the viaduct.[5][6][7]
See also
Notes
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ In The Theory, Practice, and Architecture of Bridges of Stone, Iron, Timber.. the contracted cost is given as £34,619 and the actual cost as £38,000.Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
- ↑ Walker's original design had full arches at either end, and a total length of 135ft – the design was modified to replace both of the end arches with three smaller arches. Walker was unhappy with this modification,Script error: No such module "Footnotes". and the architect Charles Barry was also critical of the change.[1]
- ↑ In Account of the Victoria Bridge, Erected Across the River Wear Script error: No such module "Footnotes". an erroneous span width of 60ft is given for one of the main arches
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Further reading
<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Notes
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
References
<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
External links
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Pages with script errors
- Pages using infobox bridge with id
- Pages with broken file links
- Bridges across the River Wear
- Bridges completed in 1838
- Railway viaducts in Tyne and Wear
- Transport in the City of Sunderland
- Grade II* listed buildings in Tyne and Wear
- Former railway bridges in the United Kingdom
- Grade II* listed railway bridges and viaducts