User talk:Radius

Re: Parsec.

Okay I misplaced the decimal point, somehow, but surely a number with 15 significant figures doesn't deserve to be marked as an approximation! (And the Astronomical unit seems to be known to only 12 digits, so the parsec should be the same.)
wwoods 21:12, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Based on what you say, I would not object to reducing the number of digits to 12. I do not feel strongly either way about the "~".

Radius 08:42, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Actually, when I do the math I get 3.085 677 581 31×10¹⁶, using the 12-digit value for AU given in astronomical unit and 30-some digits of pi. The value used for AU further down in the article is different.

Radius 09:31, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Re:Sally Gerber

Dear Ray: Hi1 Thanks for your message on my talk page. Im flattered when someone reads an article I originated. As far as Sally Gerber, you have a point. When I began the article, the Gerber website said it was Sally Gerber. A couple days ago, (since I had mailed Sally through the Gerber company asking for an autograph), I received a letter from the Gerber company stating they think the baby was Clark Gable! or Humphrey Bogart or just a baby from the street that they liked. Not even they are sure who the baby is.

We need to clean up the article. Leave it, because Sally was, actually, a real person, but point out all the other possibilities as well.

Thank you and God bless you! Your friend, "Antonio Crocodile Swamp Martin"

WikiProject Contract bridge

Hi. You might be interested in participating in new Wikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridge. Regards, Duja 10:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Drury convention

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Drury convention, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Burntsauce 20:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

I have added four references to the article. Radius 23:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)