Systems thinking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

File:Systems thinking about the society.svg
Depiction of systems thinking about society

Template:Complex systems Systems thinking is a way of making sense of the complexity of the world by looking at it in terms of wholes and relationships rather than by splitting it down into its parts.[1][2] It has been used as a way of exploring and developing effective action in complex contexts,[3] enabling systems change.[4][5] Systems thinking draws on and contributes to systems theory and the system sciences.[6]

History

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Ptolemaic system versus the Copernican system

The term system is polysemic: Robert Hooke (1674) used it in multiple senses, in his System of the World,[7]Template:Rp but also in the sense of the Ptolemaic system versus the Copernican system[8]Template:Rp of the relation of the planets to the fixed stars[9] which are cataloged in Hipparchus' and Ptolemy's Star catalog.[10] Hooke's claim was answered in magisterial detail by Newton's (1687) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Book three, The System of the World[11]Template:Rp (that is, the system of the world is a physical system).[7]

Newton's approach, using dynamical systems continues to this day.[8] In brief, Newton's equations (a system of equations) have methods for their solution.

Feedback control systems

File:Ideal feedback model.svg
System output can be controlled with feedback.

By 1824, the Carnot cycle presented an engineering challenge, which was how to maintain the operating temperatures of the hot and cold working fluids of the physical plant.[12] In 1868, James Clerk Maxwell presented a framework for, and a limited solution to, the problem of controlling the rotational speed of a physical plant.[13] Maxwell's solution echoed James Watt's (1784) centrifugal moderator (denoted as element Q) for maintaining (but not enforcing) the constant speed of a physical plant (that is, Q represents a moderator, but not a governor, by Maxwell's definition).[14]Template:Efn

Maxwell's approach, which linearized the equations of motion of the system, produced a tractable method of solution.[14]Template:Rp Norbert Wiener identified this approach as an influence on his studies of cyberneticsTemplate:Efn during World War II[14] and Wiener even proposed treating some subsystems under investigation as black boxes.[15]Template:Rp Methods for solutions of the systems of equations then become the subject of study, as in feedback control systems, in stability theory, in constraint satisfaction problems, the unification algorithm, type inference, and so forth.

Applications

"So, how do we change the structure of systems to produce more of what we want and less of that which is undesirable? ... MIT’s Jay Forrester likes to say that the average manager can ... guess with great accuracy where to look for leverage points—places in the system where a small change could lead to a large shift in behavior".[16]Template:RpDonella Meadows, (2008) Thinking In Systems: A Primer p.145 Template:Efn

Characteristics

File:System boundary2.svg
System boundary in context
File:OpenSystemRepresentation.svg
System input and output allows exchange of energy and information across boundary.

Script error: No such module "anchor".Template:Quote Template:Quote

  • Script error: No such module "anchor".Subsystems serve as part of a larger system, but each comprises a system in its own right. Each frequently can be described reductively, with properties obeying its own laws, such as Newton's System of the World, in which entire planets, stars, and their satellites can be treated, sometimes in a scientific way as dynamical systems, entirely mathematically, as demonstrated by Johannes Kepler's equation (1619) for the orbit of Mars before Newton's Principia appeared in 1687.
  • Script error: No such module "anchor".Black boxes are subsystems whose operation can be characterized by their inputs and outputs, without regard to further detail.[16]Template:Rp[17]

Particular systems

Systems far from equilibrium

Script error: No such module "anchor". Living systems are resilient,[29] and are far from equilibrium.[16]Template:Rp[28] Homeostasis is the analog to equilibrium, for a living system; the concept was described in 1849, and the term was coined in 1926.[30][31]

Script error: No such module "anchor". Resilient systems are self-organizing;[29]Template:Efn[16]Template:Rp [32]

Script error: No such module "anchor". The scope of functional controls is hierarchical, in a resilient system.[29][16]Template:Rp

Frameworks and methodologies

Frameworks and methodologies for systems thinking include:

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

Notes

Template:Notelist

References

Template:Reflist

Sources

Template:Systems Template:Authority control

  1. Anderson, Virginia, & Johnson, Lauren (1997). Systems Thinking Basics: From Concepts to Causal Loops. Waltham, Mass: Pegasus Comm., Inc.
  2. Magnus Ramage and Karen Shipp. 2009. Systems Thinkers. Springer.
  3. Introduction to Systems thinking. Report of GSE and GORS seminar. Civil Service Live. 3 July 2012. Government Office for Science.
  4. Sarah York, Rea Lavi, Yehudit Judy Dori, and MaryKay Orgill Applications of Systems Thinking in STEM Education J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96, 12, 2742–2751 Publication Date:May 14, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00261
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Systemic Thinking 101 Russell L Ackoff From Mechanistic to Systemic thinking, also awal street journal (2016) Systems Thinking Speech by Dr. Russell Ackoff 1:10:57
  7. a b Hooke, Robert (1674) An attempt to prove the motion of the earth from observations
  8. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". as reprinted in Gerald Midgely (ed.) (2002) Systems thinking vol One
  9. Jon Voisey Universe Today (14 Oct 2022) Scholarly History of Ptolemy’s Star Catalog Index
  10. Jessica Lightfoot Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 57 (2017) 935–9672017 Hipparchus Commentary On Aratus and Eudoxus
  11. Newton, Isaac (1687) Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica
  12. Sadi Carnot (1824) Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire
  13. James Clerk Maxwell (1868) On Governors 12 pages
  14. a b c Otto Mayr (1971) Maxwell and the Origins of Cybernetics Isis, Vol. 62, No. 4 (Winter, 1971), pp. 424-444 (21 pages)
  15. Peter Galison (1994) The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision Critical Inquiry, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Autumn, 1994), pp. 228–266 (39 pages) JSTOR
  16. a b c d e Donella Meadows, (2008) Thinking In Systems: A Primer
  17. Wiener, Norbert; Cybernetics: Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine, MIT Press, 1961, ISBN 0-262-73009-X, page xi
  18. Aristotle, Politics
  19. JS Maloy (2009) The Aristotelianism of Locke's Politics Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 70, No. 2 (April 2009), pp. 235–257 (23 pages)
  20. Aristotle, History of Animals
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Adam Smith (1776) The Wealth of Nations Book IV refers to commercial, and mercantile systems, as well as to systems of political enonomy
  23. Max Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
  24. Talcott Parsons, The Structure of Social Action
  25. MIT Radiation Laboratory, MIT Radiation Laboratory Series, 28 volumes
  26. Richard Pates (2021) What is a Lyapunov function
  27. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". 272 pages.
  28. a b Glansdorff, P., Prigogine, I. (1971). Thermodynamic Theory of Structure, Stability and Fluctuations, London: Wiley-Interscience Template:ISBN
  29. a b c Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ah3
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  32. H T Odum (25 Nov 1988) Self-Organization, Transformity and Information Science Vol 242, Issue 4882 pp. 1132–1139 as reprinted by Gerald Midgley ed. (2002), Systems Thinking vol 2
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".