Smash product
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "For". Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
In topology, a branch of mathematics, the smash product of two pointed spaces (i.e. topological spaces with distinguished basepoints) (X, x0)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". and (Y, y0)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is the quotient of the product space X × YScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". under the identifications (x, y0) ~ (x0, y)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". for all Template:Mvar in Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar in Template:Mvar. The smash product is itself a pointed space, with basepoint being the equivalence class of (x0, y0).Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". The smash product is usually denoted X ∧ YScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". or X ⨳ YScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".. The smash product depends on the choice of basepoints (unless both X and Y are homogeneous).
One can think of Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar as sitting inside X × YScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". as the subspaces X × {y0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".} and {x0} × Y.Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". These subspaces intersect at a single point: (x0, y0),Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". the basepoint of X × Y.Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". So the union of these subspaces can be identified with the wedge sum . In particular, {x0} × YScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". in X × YScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". is identified with Template:Mvar in , ditto for X × {y0Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".} and Template:Mvar. In , subspaces Template:Mvar and Template:Mvar intersect in the single point . The smash product is then the quotient
The smash product shows up in homotopy theory, a branch of algebraic topology. In homotopy theory, one often works with a different category of spaces than the category of all topological spaces. In some of these categories the definition of the smash product must be modified slightly. For example, the smash product of two CW complexes is a CW complex if one uses the product of CW complexes in the definition rather than the product topology. Similar modifications are necessary in other categories.
Examples
- The smash product of any pointed space X with a 0-sphere (a discrete space with two points) is homeomorphic to X.
- The smash product of two circles is a quotient of the torus homeomorphic to the 2-sphere. That is, it is the quotient space of the torus by the figure-8 space . This can be visualized by taking the union of the innermost line of latitude of the torus and a given line of longitude and assuming their intersection is the basepoint. The union of two circles intersecting at a point is homeomorphic to the figure-8 space, which is then collapsed to a single point, resulting in a quotient space homeomorphic to the 2-sphere (see diagram).
- More generally, the smash product of two spheres Sm and Sn is homeomorphic to the sphere Sm+n.
- The smash product of a space X with a circle is homeomorphic to the reduced suspension of X:
- The k-fold iterated reduced suspension of X is homeomorphic to the smash product of X and a k-sphere
- In domain theory, taking the product of two domains (so that the product is strict on its arguments).
As a symmetric monoidal product
For any pointed spaces X, Y, and Z in an appropriate "convenient" category (e.g., that of compactly generated spaces), there are natural (basepoint preserving) homeomorphisms
However, for the naive category of pointed spaces, this fails, as shown by the counterexample and found by Dieter Puppe.[1] A proof due to Kathleen Lewis that Puppe's counterexample is indeed a counterexample can be found in the book of J. Peter May and Johann Sigurdsson.[2]
These isomorphisms make the appropriate category of pointed spaces into a symmetric monoidal category with the smash product as the monoidal product and the pointed 0-sphere (a two-point discrete space) as the unit object. One can therefore think of the smash product as a kind of tensor product in an appropriate category of pointed spaces.
Adjoint relationship
Adjoint functors make the analogy between the tensor product and the smash product more precise. In the category of R-modules over a commutative ring R, the tensor functor is left adjoint to the internal Hom functor , so that
In the category of pointed spaces, the smash product plays the role of the tensor product in this formula: if are compact Hausdorff then we have an adjunction
where denotes continuous maps that send basepoint to basepoint, and carries the compact-open topology.[3]
In particular, taking to be the unit circle , we see that the reduced suspension functor is left adjoint to the loop space functor :
Notes
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". (p. 336)
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ * Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Reissued in 1980 (Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-29840-7) and 1996 (Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, ISBN 0-486-69131-4), Theorem 6.2.38c
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".