Sense of wonder
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". Template:Use dmy dates
In science fiction journalism, a sense of wonder (sometimes comically written as sensawunda)[1][2] is a specific, often desirable, intellectual and emotional state evoked in the reader by the genre.
Definitions
This entry focuses on one specific use of the phrase "sense of wonder." This phrase is widely used in contexts that have nothing to do with science fiction. The following relates to the use of "sense of wonder" within the context of science fiction. In Brave New Words: The Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction the term sense of wonder is defined as follows: Template:Quote
Jon Radoff has characterised a sense of wonder as an emotional reaction to the reader suddenly confronting, understanding, or seeing a concept anew in the context of new information.[3]
In the introductory section of his essay 'On the Grotesque in Science Fiction', Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Jr., Professor of English, DePauw University, states:
John Clute and Peter Nicholls associate the experience with that of the "conceptual breakthrough" or "paradigm shift" (Clute & Nicholls 1993). In many cases, it is achieved through the recasting of previous narrative experiences in a larger context. It can be found in short scenes (e.g., in Star Wars (1977), it can be found, in a small dose, inside the line "That's no moon; it's a space station.") and it can require entire novels to set up (as in the final line to Iain Banks's Feersum Endjinn.)
George Mann defines the term as "the sense of inspired awe that is aroused in a reader when the full implications of an event or action become realized, or when the immensity of a plot or idea first becomes known;"Template:Rp and he associates the term with the Golden Age of SF and the pulp magazines prevalent at the time. One of the major writers of the Golden Age, Isaac Asimov, agreed with this association: in 1967 commenting on the changes occurring in SF he wrote,
As a concept especially connected with science fiction
George Mann suggests that this 'sense of wonder' is associated only with science fiction as distinct from science fantasy, stating:
However, the editor and critic David Hartwell sees SF's 'sense of wonder' in more general terms, as "being at the root of the excitement of science fiction". For Hartwell, "Science fiction's appeal lies in combination of the rational, the believable, with the miraculous."[4]Template:Rp
Academic criticism of science fiction literature (Robu 1988) identifies the idea of the sublime described by Edmund Burke and Immanuel Kant—infinity, immensity, "delightful horror"—as a key to understanding the concept of "sense of wonder" in science fiction. For example, Professor of English at the University of Iowa, Brooks Landon says:
Brian Aldiss and David Wingrove's history of science fiction, Trillion Year Spree, also invokes Gothic horror and the concept of the sublime.[5]Template:Rp Paul K. Alkon does likewise in his book on science fiction before 1900, arguing that science fiction provides a way to "achieve sublimity without recourse to the supernatural."[6]Template:Rp
Edward James, in a section of his book entitled 'The Sense of Wonder' says on this point of the origin of the 'sense of wonder' in SF:
James goes on to explore the same point as made by David Hartwell in his book Age of Wonders (and quoted above) as regards the relationship of the 'sense of wonder' in SF to religion or the religious experience. He states that:
As an example James takes the short story 'The Nine Billion Names of God' by Arthur C. Clarke. He explains:
Others have opined that Clarke "has dedicated his career to evoking a "sense of wonder" at the sublime spaces of the universe..."[7]Template:Rp and cited his novels like Childhood's End and Rendezvous with Rama in that regard.[8]Template:Rp
Kathryn Cramer in her essay 'On Science and Science Fiction' also explores the relationship of SF's 'sense of wonder' to religion, stating that "The primacy of the sense of wonder in science fiction poses a direct challenge to religion: Does the wonder of science and the natural world as experienced through science fiction replace religious awe?"[9] Template:Rp
However, as Brooks Landon shows, not all 'sense of wonder' needs to be so closely related to the classical sense of the Sublime. Commenting on the story 'Twilight' by John W. Campbell he says:
Despite the attempts above to define and illustrate the 'sense of wonder' in SF, Csicsery-Ronay Jr. argues that "unlike most of the other qualities regularly associated with the genre, the sense of wonder resists critical commentary."[10]Template:Rp The reason he suggests is that,
Nevertheless, despite this "resistance to critical commentary," the 'sense of wonder' has "a well-established pedigree in art, separated into two related categories of response: the expansive sublime and the intensive grotesque." Csicsery-Ronay Jr. explains the difference between these two categories as follows:
Later in this same essay the author argues that "the sublime and the grotesque are in such close kinship that they are shadows of each other," and that "it is not always easy to distinguish the two, and the grotesque of one age easily becomes the sublime of another."[10]Template:Rp He gives as an example the android (T-1000) in the second 'Terminator' film Terminator 2: Judgment Day, saying that "The T-1000, like so many liminal figures in sf, is almost simultaneously sublime and grotesque. Its fascinating shape-shifting would be the object of sublime awe were it not for its sadistic violation of mundane flesh."[10]Template:Rp
Natural vs synthetic origin
Sharona Ben-Tov in her book The Artificial Paradise: Science Fiction and American Reality[11] explores science-fiction's (SF) 'sense of wonder' from a feminist perspective. Her book is a "thought-provoking work of criticism that provides a new and interesting perspective on some basic elements in science fiction," including the 'sense of wonder'.[12]Template:Rp In his review of Ben-Tov's work for the SF critical journal Extrapolation David Dalgleish, quoting from the text, points out that:
See also
References
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ Hartwell, David. Age of Wonders (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985)
- ↑ Aldiss, Brian and David Wingrove (eds.).Trillion Year Spree quoted in James, Edward. Science Fiction in the 20th Century (Oxford University Press, 1994)
- ↑ Alkon, Paul K. Science Fiction before 1900. Imagination Discovers Technology (New York: Routledge, 2002)
- ↑ Seed, David. 'Introduction' in David Seed (ed.) A Companion to Science Fiction (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008)
- ↑ Ashley, Mike. Introduction to 'Out of the Sun' in Ashley, Mike (ed.) The Mammoth Book of Mindblowing SF (London: Constable and Robinson, 2009)
- ↑ Cramer, Kathryn. 'Introduction: On Science and Science Fiction,' in David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer (eds.), The Ascent of Wonder. The Evolution of Hard SF (London: Orbit, 1994)
- ↑ a b c Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedronay - ↑ Ben-Tov, Sharona. The Artificial Paradise: Science Fiction and American Reality (Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1995).
- ↑ Dalgleish, David. Book review: 'The ambivalent paradise: Or, nature and the transcendent in British SF,' review of The Artificial Paradise by Sharona Ben-Tov', Extrapolation Kent: Winter 1997. Volume 38, Issue 4; p. 327.
Bibliography
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Science fiction