San Francisco Committee of Vigilance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

File:Lynching-of-casey-and-cora.jpg
Charles Cora and James Casey are hanged by the Committee of Vigilance, San Francisco, 1856.

The San Francisco Committee of Vigilance was a vigilante group formed in 1851. The catalyst for its formation was the criminality of the Sydney Ducks gang.[1] It was revived in 1856 in response to rampant crime and corruption in the municipal government of San Francisco, California. The explosive population growth following the discovery of gold in 1848 was cited as the source of the alleged need for the revival of the committee. The small town of about 900 individuals grew to a booming city of over 20,000 very rapidly.[2] Founders alleged that the growth in population overwhelmed the previously established law enforcement, and led to the organization of vigilante militia groups.

These militias hanged eight people and forced several elected officials to resign. Each Committee of Vigilance formally relinquished power after three months.[3]

1851

File:Whittaker andMcKenzie hanging Barber 1865p644.jpg
Hanging of Samuel Whittaker and Robert McKenzie, August 24, 1851

The 1851 Committee of Vigilance was inaugurated on June 9 with the promulgation of a written doctrine declaring its aims[4] and hanged John Jenkins of Sydney, Australia, on June 10 after he was convicted of stealing a safe from an office in a trial organized by the committee: grand larceny was punishable by death under California law at the time.[5] The June 13 Daily Alta California printed this statement:

Template:Quote

It boasted a membership of 700 and claimed to operate in parallel to, and in defiance of, the duly constituted city government. Committee members used its headquarters for the interrogation and incarceration of suspects who were denied the benefits of due process. The committee engaged in policing, investigating disreputable boarding houses and vessels, deporting immigrants, and parading its militia. Four people were hanged by the committee; one was whipped (a common punishment at that time); fourteen were deported to Australia; fourteen were informally ordered to leave California; fifteen were handed over to public authorities; and forty-one were discharged. The 1851 Committee of Vigilance was dissolved during the September elections, but its executive members continued to meet into 1853.[6]

A total of four were executed: John Jenkins, an Australian from Sydney accused of burglary, who was hanged on June 10, 1851; James Stuart, also from Sydney and accused of murder, who was hanged on July 11, 1851; and Samuel Whittaker and Robert McKenzie, associates of Stuart accused of "various heinous crimes", who were hanged on August 24, 1851. The lynching of Whittaker and McKenzie occurred three days after a standoff between the committee and the nascent police force trying to protect the prisoners; the committee nabbed Whittaker and McKenzie after storming the jail during Sunday church services.[7]

The committee also tried to punish arsonists.[8]

1856

File:Committee of Vigilance medallion.jpg
1856 Committee of Vigilance medallion inscribed: "Organized 9th June 1851. Reorganized 14th May 1856. Be Just and Fear Not." The eye symbol was borrowed from Freemasonry, but in its 1856 vigilante context conveyed surveillance as a means of social discipline, not the Masonic meaning of scientific and aesthetic knowledge. Note that Lady Justice is not blindfolded.[6]

The Committee of Vigilance was reorganized on 14 May 1856 by many of the leaders from the first one and adopted an amended version of the 1851 constitution.[6] Unlike the earlier committee, and the vigilante tradition generally, the 1856 committee was concerned with not only civil crimes but also politics and political corruption.[6] The catalyst for the committee was a murder, in the guise of a political duel in which James P. Casey shot opposition newspaper editor James King of William. King, along with many San Francisco residents, was outraged by Casey's appointment to the city board of supervisors and believed that the election had been rigged. The motivation behind this murder came from King's publishing an article in the Daily Evening Bulletin accusing Casey of illegal activities,[9] and serving a prison term for Grand Larceny in New York. The combination of the political unrest surrounding the election and the article resulted in Casey's shooting of James King.

The 1856 committee was also much larger than the committee of 1851, claiming 6,000 in its ranks. The committee worked very closely with the formal government of San Francisco. The president of the Vigilance Committee, William T. Coleman, was a close friend of Governor J. Neely Johnson and the two men met on several occasions working towards the shared goal of stabilizing the town.[10] Another important figure at this time who would later come to make a name for himself in the Civil War is William T. Sherman. Sherman was running a bank when Governor Johnson requested he become the commander of the San Francisco branch of the state militia in order to curb the activities of the Committee. Sherman accepted the position two days before the murder of King by Casey.[11]

The 1856 Committee of Vigilance dissolved on 11 August 1856, and marked the occasion with a "Grand Parade".[6]

Political power in San Francisco was transferred to a new political party established by the vigilantes, the People's Party, which ruled until 1867 and was eventually absorbed into the Republican Party. The vigilantes had thus succeeded in their objective of usurping power from the Democratic Party machine that hitherto dominated civic politics in the city.[12] Notable people included William Tell Coleman, Martin J. Burke, San Francisco mayor Henry F. Teschemacher, and San Francisco's first chief of police James F. Curtis.

Vigilante headquarters in 1856 consisted of assembly halls, meeting rooms, a military kitchen and armory, an infirmary, and prison cells, all of which were fortified with gunny sacks and cannons.[6] Four people were officially executed again in 1856, but the death toll also includes James "Yankee" Sullivan, an Irish immigrant and professional boxer who killed himself after being terrorized and detained in a Vigilante cell.[6][13]

The 1856 committee also engaged in policing, investigations, and secret trials, but it far exceeded its predecessor in audacity and rebelliousness. Most notably, it seized three shipments of armaments intended for the state militia and tried the chief justice of the California Supreme Court.[6] The committee's authority, however, was bolstered by almost all militia units in the city, including the California Guards.[6]

Controversy

From the Daily Evening Bulletin, James King of William, Editor. May 14, 1856:

Template:Quote

File:WW18560601.1.4-528-456-2297-1289-574w.jpg
Shooting of James King of William by Casey[14]
File:WW18560601.1.4-3611-456-2357-1669-589w.jpg
Casey and Cora being handed to the Vigilance committee[14]
File:Hanging-James P Casey and Charles Cora.jpg
The hanging of Cora and Casey

There remains historical controversy about the vigilance movements. For example, both Charles Cora and James Casey were hanged in 1856 as murderers by the Committee of Vigilance: Cora shot and killed U.S. Marshal William H. Richardson who had drunkenly insulted Cora's mistress, Belle Cora,[15] while Casey shot James King of William, editor of rival newspaper The Evening Bulletin, for publishing an editorial that exposed Casey's criminal record in New York.[16]

King had also denounced the corruption of City Officials who he believed had let Cora off the hook for Richardson's murder: Cora's first trial had ended in a hung jury, and there were rumors that the jury had been bribed. Casey's friends sneaked him into the jail precisely because they were afraid that he would be hanged. This hanging may have been a response by frustrated citizens to ineffectual law enforcement, or a belief that due process would result in acquittals. Popular histories have accepted the former view: that the illegality and brutality of the vigilantes was justified by the need to establish law and order in the city.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

One prominent critic of the San Francisco vigilantes was General W. T. Sherman, who resigned from his position as Major-general of the Second Division of Militia in San Francisco. In his memoirs, Sherman wrote:

As [the vigilantes] controlled the press, they wrote their own history, and the world generally gives them the credit of having purged San Francisco of rowdies and roughs; but their success has given great stimulus to a dangerous principle, that would at any time justify the mob in seizing all the power of government; and who is to say that the Vigilance Committee may not be composed of the worst, instead of the best, elements of a community? Indeed, in San Francisco, as soon as it was demonstrated that the real power had passed from the City Hall to the committee room, the same set of bailiffs, constables, and rowdies that had infested the City Hall were found in the employment of the "Vigilantes."[17]

Influence in British Columbian affairs

A former member of the San Francisco Committee of Vigilance, physician Max Fifer, moved to Yale, British Columbia at the time of the Fraser Canyon Gold Rush, and participated in the organization of a Vigilance Committee on the Fraser River in 1858 to address issues of lawlessness and a vacuum of effective governmental authority created by the sudden influx of prospectors to the new British colony.[18] The Vigilance Committee, which in San Francisco had persecuted disgraced Philadelphia lawyer Ned McGowan, played a role in the bloodless McGowan's War on the lower Fraser in 1858–1859. At the end of the so-called "War", McGowan was convicted by Judge Matthew Baillie Begbie of an assault against Fifer in British Columbia[19] but McGowan's defense statement, which described some of the activities of the San Francisco vigilantes and his own personal experience of vigilantism, impressed and disturbed Begbie who, like Colonial Governor James Douglas was determined to prevent conditions in the goldfields of British Columbia from deteriorating into mob rule.[20]

Flags

The flag carried by Committee was usually the Stars and Stripes, it always flew over their armory. Two months after being organized the first flag used to represent the Committee was given to Captain Edgar. It was 14 foot streamer consisting of a red field with a lone star and the words "Vigilance" and "Eureka." On the other side was the seal of California.[21][22][23]

File:Montgomery Street 1857.jpg
An etching of Montgomery Street in 1857

On August 9th, 1851 they were given a large blue banner at Montgomery street. It had the inscription: "Presented to the Vigilance Committee of the City of San Francisco by the ladies of Trinity Parish, as a testimonial of their approval. Do right and fear not. August 9th, 1851." and on the other side "The Vigilance Committee of the city of San Francisco, instituted June 9th, 1851, for the protection of the lives and property of the citizens and residents of San Francisco."[24] They attached it to a wagon and used in a local parade.[25] Two other flags were flying on Montgomery street, and one was described as: "...inscribed "Pioneer Guards, Co. 4, V. C., organized May 16th, 1856."[24]

In July of 1856 the Committee was in Musical Hall when they were presented with a flag made by ladies of the city.[26] The flag is illustrated in Fireman's Journal and Military Gazette.[27]

In popular culture

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

References

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

  • Brown, Richard Maxwell. Strain of Violence: Historical Studies of American Violence and Vigilantism (1977) pp. 134–143.
  • Hauka, Donald J., McGowan's War, Vancouver: New Start Books, 2003. Template:ISBN Template:ISBN (excerpt)
  • Hittell, T.H. History of California, Vol. 3, 1897
  • Kelly, Joseph M. "Shifting Interpretation of the San-Francisco Vigilantes." Journal of the West 24.1 (1985): 39–46.
  • Lotchin, Roger W. San Francisco, 1846-1856: From Hamlet to City (Oxford UP. 1974), pp. 213–275.
  • Mullen, Kevin J. Let Justice Be Done: Crime and Politics in Early San Francisco (1990) on 1849-51
  • Myers, John Myers, San Francisco's Reign of Terror. Garden City, N.Y., Doubleday, 1966
  • Quinn, Arthur, The Rivals: William Gwin, David Broderick, and the Birth of California, Univ. of Nebraska Press, 1997, Template:ISBN
  • Senkewicz, Robert M. Vigilantes in Gold Rush San Francisco (Stanford University Press, 1985), a scholarly history
  • Stewart, George R., Committee of Vigilance; Revolution in San Francisco, 1851. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1964.
  • Taniguchi, Nancy J.Land, Violence, and the 1856 San Francisco Vigilance Committee, 2016.

External links

Template:Riots in the United States (1607–1865)

  1. ↑ Herbert Asbury. "Sydney Ducks" in The Barbary Coast: An Informal History of the San Francisco Underworld Basic Books, 1933
  2. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. ↑ [2] The Rivals: William Gwin, David Broderick, and the Birth of California By Arthur Quinn, 1997, p. 109
  5. ↑ Johnson, John. Historic US Court Cases. Pg. 49. Routelidge, 2001
  6. ↑ a b c d e f g h i Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. ↑ Hittell, T.H. History of California Vol 3 (1897), pp. 313-330.
  8. ↑ Gordon Morris Bakken, Law in the western United States, Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 2000, p. 110.
  9. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. ↑ Asbury, Herbert. The Barbary Coast: An Informal History of the San Francisco Underworld. p. 84. Basic Books, 2002.
  16. ↑ Asbury, Herbert. The Barbary Coast: An Informal History of the San Francisco Underworld. pp. 86–87. Basic Books, 2002.
  17. ↑ Template:Gutenberg
  18. ↑ Donald J. Hauka, McGowan's War, Vancouver: New Start Books, 2003, p. 136
  19. ↑ Hauka, p. 180
  20. ↑ Hauka, p. 182
  21. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. ↑ a b The Story of CALIFORNIA & her flags to color Vol. 3, by BELLEROPHON BOOKS, p. 20-21
  23. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. ↑ The Story of CALIFORNIA & her flags to color Vol. 3, by BELLEROPHON BOOKS, p. 30-31
  26. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. ↑ Fireman's Journal and Military Gazette, August 30, 1856
  28. ↑ The Story of CALIFORNIA & her flags to color Vol. 3, by BELLEROPHON BOOKS, p. 49
  29. ↑ Fireman's Journal and Military Gazette, August 13 1856
  30. ↑ Fireman's Journal and Military Gazette, September 20, 1856
Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=San_Francisco_Committee_of_Vigilance&oldid=1542945"