Rubble pile

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description

File:Itokawa06 hayabusa.jpg
The small near-Earth asteroid 25143 Itokawa is a prime example of a rubble pile, with numerous boulders covering its surface

In astronomy, a rubble pile is a celestial body that consists of numerous pieces of debris that have coalesced under the influence of gravity. Rubble piles have low density because there are large cavities between the various chunks that make them up.

The asteroids Bennu and Ryugu have a measured bulk density which suggests that their internal structure is a rubble pile.[1][2] Many comets and most smaller minor planets (<10 km in diameter) are thought to be composed of coalesced rubble.[3][4]

Minor planets

Template:More citations needed section

File:LCDB Period vs. Diameter Plot.png
Rotation periods of a large number of minor planets.Template:Efn Most smaller bodies have a period between 2.2 and 20 hours, and are thought to be rubble piles. Bodies rotating faster than 2.2 hours, however, must be monolithic, as they would fly apart otherwise. This explains why there are so few fast-spinning minor planets.[3]

Most smaller asteroids are thought to be rubble piles.[3]

Rubble piles form when an asteroid or moon (which may originally be monolithic) is smashed to pieces by an impact, and the shattered pieces subsequently fall back together, primarily due to self-gravitation. This coalescing usually takes from several hours to weeks.[5]

Script error: No such module "anchor".When a rubble-pile asteroid passes a much more massive object, tidal forces change its shape.[6]

Scientists first suspected that asteroids are often rubble piles when asteroid densities were first determined. Many of the calculated densities were significantly less than those of meteorites, which in some cases had been determined to be pieces of asteroids.

Many asteroids with low densities are thought to be rubble piles, for example 253 Mathilde. The mass of Mathilde, as determined by the NEAR Shoemaker mission, is far too low for the volume observed, considering the surface is rock. Even ice with a thin crust of rock would not provide a suitable density. Also, the large impact craters on Mathilde would have shattered a rigid body. However, the first unambiguous rubble pile to be photographed is 25143 Itokawa, which has no obvious impact craters and is thus almost certainly a coalescence of shattered fragments.

The asteroid 433 Eros, the primary destination of NEAR Shoemaker, was determined to be riven with cracks but otherwise solid. Other asteroids, possibly including Itokawa, have been found to be contact binaries, two major bodies touching, with or without rubble filling the boundary.

Large interior voids are possible because of the very low gravity of most asteroids. Despite a fine regolith on the outside (at least to the resolution that has been seen with spacecraft), the asteroid's gravity is so weak that friction between fragments dominates and prevents small pieces from falling inwards and filling the voids.

All the largest asteroids (1 Ceres, 2 Pallas, 4 Vesta, 10 Hygiea, 704 Interamnia) are solid objects without any macroscopic internal porosity. This may be because they have been large enough to withstand all impacts, and have never been shattered. Alternatively, Ceres and some few other of the largest asteroids may be massive enough that, even if they were shattered but not dispersed, their gravity would collapse most voids upon recoalescing. Vesta, at least, has withstood intact one major impact since its formation and shows signs of internal structure from differentiation in the resultant crater that assures that it is not a rubble pile. This serves as evidence for size as a protection from shattering into rubble.

Comets

File:Comet 67P True color.jpg
Nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko imaged by Rosetta

Observational evidence suggest that the cometary nucleus may not be a well-consolidated single body, but may instead be a loosely bound agglomeration of smaller fragments, weakly bonded and subject to occasional or even frequent disruptive events, although the larger cometary fragments are expected to be primordial condensations rather than collisionally derived debris as in the asteroid case.[7][8][9][10][11] However, in situ observations by the Rosetta mission indicate that it may be more complex than that.[12]Template:Clarification needed

Moons

File:Phobos colour 2008.jpg
Phobos imaged by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

The moon Phobos, the larger of the two natural satellites of the planet Mars, is also thought to be a rubble pile bound together by a thin regolith crust about Template:Convert thick.[13][14] A rubble-pile morphology may point towards an in situ origin of the Martian moons. Based on this, it has been proposed that Phobos and Deimos may originate from a single destroyed moon. Alternatively, Phobos may have undergone repeated 'recycling,' having been torn apart into a ring before reaccreting and migrating outwards.[15]

See also

References

Template:Notelist

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "Navbox".

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ChesleyFarnocchia2014
  2. Hayabusa-2: Asteroid mission exploring a 'rubble pile'. Paul Rincon, BBC News. 19 March 2019.
  3. a b c Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named MPC-light-curve
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Michel-2001
  6. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Solem-1996
  7. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Weissman-1986
  8. Tidal Disruption of Asteroids and Comets. William Bottke. Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado. 1998.
  9. Stardust at Comet Wild 2. (PDF) Harold A. Weaver, Science 18 JUNE 2004, Vol 304.
  10. Interior of the Cometary Nucleus. University of California, Los Angeles.
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named madeira2023