Reform Club of Hong Kong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Hatnote". Template:Use Hong Kong English Template:Use dmy dates Template:Short description

Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". Script error: No such module "infobox". Template:Liberalism in China The Reform Club of Hong Kong was one of the oldest political organisations in Hong Kong, existing from 1949 until the mid-1990s. Established by expatriates who were concerned about the Young Plan proposed by Governor Mark Aitchison Young in 1949, the Reform Club was the first semi-political party to contest in the Urban Council elections, with its longtime chairman Brook Bernacchi serving on the Council for about forty years.

It demanded expansion of the power of the Urban Council and elected representatives in the Legislative Council for years. Together with the Hong Kong Civic Association, they were the closest to opposition parties in Hong Kong active in the municipal electoral politics during the post-war colonial period. With the expansion of the franchise in the 1980s, the Reform Club gradually declined and was replaced by the more energetic political groups. The Club ceased to function after its chairman Bernacchi retired from the Urban Council in 1995.

History

The Reform Club was founded by expatriate barrister Brook Bernacchi in 1949 in the midst of the debate over the Young Plan, a plan for wide constitutional reform in Hong Kong. The immediate target of the Club was to campaign for direct elections to the Legislative Council of Hong Kong.[1] Unlike the Hong Kong Chinese Reform Association, which was set up during the same time for similar causes, the Reform Club was dominated by expatriates.[2]

For decades the Reform Club and the Civic Association dominated municipal politics as they provided most of the elected members of the Urban Council.[3] It advocated more representative government in the territory and the improvement of public sector social services. In 1960, the two groups formed a coalition and sent a delegate to London to demand direct elections to the Legislative Council. The Reform Club adopted a modest stance amid the 1966 riots, opposing violent actions from both protesters and the police.[4] In 1979, the Reform Club threatened to boycott elections if the Urban Council would not receive a majority of elected members and universal franchise was extended to all Hong Kong citizens. In 1982, it took part in the elections for the newly established district boards in the urban districts, which significantly extended the franchise.

Starting from the late 1960s, the Club's ability to monopolise Urban Council elections with the Civic Association eroded, in light of the emergence of the popular independent candidates.[5] Before the expansion of the franchise, the Reform Club had 15 members in the Urban Council of 1983. But the Reform Club's influence in the Urban Council reduced during the 1980s. Following the 1989 municipal elections, only five Reform Club members remained due to its lack of grassroots support. The Reform Club and Civic Association were gradually supplanted by the new pro-democracy groups including the Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood and Meeting Point. When at the 1995 municipal elections Brook Bernacchi retired, the Reform Club ceased to be active in the Hong Kong political scene.

Notable members

Election performance

Municipal elections

Election Number of
popular votes
% of
popular votes
UrbCo
seats
RegCo
seats
Total
elected seats
1952 2,199Template:Nochange 33.58Template:Nochange Template:Composition bar -
1953 6,374Increase 71.25Increase Template:Composition bar -
1954 7,773Increase 79.64Increase Template:Composition bar -
1955 3,283Decrease 89.62Increase Template:Composition bar -
1956 17,085Increase 56.97Decrease Template:Composition bar
1957 11,716Increase 43.50Decrease Template:Composition bar
1959 12,030Decrease 47.67Decrease Template:Composition bar
1961 uncontested uncontested Template:Composition bar
1963 5,177Decrease 39.43Decrease Template:Composition bar
1965 unknown unknown Template:Composition bar
1967 9,789Increase 24.90Decrease Template:Composition bar
1969 16,571Increase 49.22Increase Template:Composition bar
1971 6,139Decrease 16.22Decrease Template:Composition bar
1973 25,709Increase 55.14Increase Template:Composition bar
1975 6,141Increase 12.41Decrease Template:Composition bar
1977 13,249Decrease 41.05Increase Template:Composition bar
1979 9,579Increase 18.76Increase Template:Composition bar
1981 7,291Decrease 28.29Decrease Template:Composition bar
1983 13,894Increase 15.38Decrease Template:Composition bar
1986 24,486Increase 6.95Decrease Template:Composition bar Template:Composition bar Template:Composition bar
1989 13,404Decrease 6.31Decrease Template:Composition bar Template:Composition bar Template:Composition bar
1991 9,045Decrease 2.31Decrease Template:Composition bar Template:Composition bar Template:Composition bar

District Board/Council elections

Election Number of
popular votes
% of
popular votes
Total
elected seats
+/−
1982 13,644Template:Nochange 3.83Template:Nochange Template:Composition bar
1985 39,929Increase 5.77Increase Template:Composition bar 7Increase
1988 13,572Decrease 2.13Decrease Template:Composition bar 5Decrease
1991 2,136Decrease 0.40Decrease Template:Composition bar 5Decrease

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Navbox with collapsible groups

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".