Nine Mile Point Nuclear Generating Station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Infobox power station

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station is a nuclear power plant with two nuclear reactors located in the town of Scriba, approximately five miles northeast of Oswego, New York, on the shore of Lake Ontario. The Template:Convert site is also occupied by the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.

In April 2011, Exelon of Chicago announced its intention to purchase Constellation Energy, the owner and operator of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. The acquisition was approved by FERC and the companies officially combined on March 12, 2012, with Constellation Energy taking the Exelon name. Exelon separated its generating assets back into Constellation Energy in 2022. Constellation owns Unit 1 and holds (82%) of Unit 2 while Long Island Power Authority holds (18%). Constellation Energy is the sole operator of both Units 1 and 2. Both units are boiling water reactors (BWRs).

Units 1 and 2

File:HD.6D.338 (10824947354).jpg
Unit 1 of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Generating Station Template:Circa

Both units are General Electric boiling water reactors (BWR). Unit 1, a BWR-2 (Generation 2), went online in 1969 and has a rated capacity of Template:Convert. It is the oldest operating commercial nuclear reactor still in service in the United States.[1] Unit 2, a BWR-5, has been in operation since 1988 and has a rated capacity of 1,375 MW. Construction of both units, along with neighboring Fitzpatrick, was commissioned by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. Fitzpatrick was sold immediately upon completion, while Niagara Mohawk retained its share of the Nine Mile Point units until 2001, when it sold them to Constellation.[2]

On October 31, 2006, Constellation announced that the NRC had granted 20-year license extensions to both units. Unit 1 is now licensed to operate until 2029, and Unit 2 is licensed until 2046.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

The Nine Mile Point 2 cooling tower is 543 feet tall and is visible from Chimney Bluffs in Sodus, New York nearly 30 miles away. Nine Mile Point 1 draws cooling water from Lake Ontario, and does not have a cooling tower.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

In early May 2011, the plant operator reported that the plant fuel supplier, General Electric, notified the operator that mathematical errors could've resulted in the reactor's fuel getting hotter than expected.[3]

In 2016, Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo directed the Public Service Commission to consider ratepayer-financed subsidies similar to those for renewable sources to keep nuclear power stations profitable in the competition against natural gas. Indian Point would not be included in the scheme.[4][5]

Withdrawn unit 3 proposal

Unistar Nuclear, a joint venture between Constellation Energy and Électricité de France (EDF), announced in late 2008 that it had notified the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) of its plan to submit a combined construction and operating license (COL) application for a European Pressurized Reactor (EPR) at Constellation Energy's Nine Mile Point site.[6] Less than a year later however, Unistar requested a temporary suspension of the application review, and in 2013, citing a lack of federal loan guarantees, withdrew the application completely.[7]

Electricity production

Generation (MWh) of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Generating Station[8]
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual (total)
2001 1,309,751 1,082,371 996,634 792,703 839,639 1,213,015 1,042,234 1,165,283 1,233,386 1,197,046 1,259,445 1,098,455 13,229,962
2002 1,301,564 1,183,386 857,629 772,513 1,226,472 1,250,520 1,272,099 1,255,248 1,243,747 1,260,796 888,453 730,464 13,242,891
2003 1,318,106 1,086,660 1,037,882 838,868 1,219,947 1,226,521 1,068,496 1,016,544 1,244,842 1,288,636 1,221,228 1,298,812 13,866,542
2004 1,132,313 1,174,594 791,970 495,639 1,249,267 1,236,082 1,282,314 1,248,743 1,163,039 1,268,515 1,271,877 1,287,183 13,601,536
2005 1,317,483 1,188,926 1,101,125 826,387 1,214,595 1,232,033 1,264,159 1,237,864 1,235,761 1,303,254 1,271,780 1,314,381 14,507,748
2006 1,311,929 1,157,117 845,319 884,828 1,305,932 1,181,231 1,278,746 1,279,037 1,253,733 1,302,056 1,268,169 1,316,237 14,384,334
2007 1,317,419 1,153,677 826,238 1,032,859 1,218,774 1,246,426 1,276,739 1,244,518 1,208,667 1,291,728 847,849 1,299,130 13,964,024
2008 1,316,569 1,225,699 1,037,712 787,827 1,297,804 1,237,640 1,268,441 1,279,355 1,243,369 1,232,911 1,150,627 1,309,769 14,387,723
2009 1,316,673 1,169,505 1,129,488 1,083,746 1,309,346 1,255,222 1,286,215 1,277,742 1,249,653 1,253,744 1,268,150 1,315,012 14,914,496
2010 1,185,280 1,167,767 1,312,218 494,373 1,189,133 1,243,776 1,279,385 1,285,670 1,249,015 1,298,050 1,214,643 1,319,743 14,239,053
2011 1,310,649 1,178,658 1,120,852 941,175 1,048,935 1,258,797 1,275,745 1,093,570 1,247,499 1,305,602 1,272,676 1,101,461 14,155,619
2012 1,316,184 1,130,245 1,304,973 658,199 461,139 881,195 1,154,809 1,387,521 1,275,120 1,351,902 961,481 1,282,495 13,165,263
2013 1,435,237 1,289,866 1,433,301 1,131,870 1,163,963 1,368,731 1,344,741 1,396,820 1,358,815 1,415,931 1,327,719 1,179,339 15,846,333
2014 1,415,857 1,288,293 959,694 486,946 1,360,306 1,344,023 1,402,344 1,398,963 1,347,028 1,420,433 1,386,105 1,429,188 15,239,180
2015 1,432,717 1,123,379 1,166,683 1,194,851 1,410,404 1,366,225 1,396,404 1,387,647 1,284,343 1,427,155 1,386,181 1,422,087 15,998,076
2016 1,434,258 1,339,141 1,426,035 754,831 1,245,904 1,362,014 1,390,660 1,388,618 1,356,487 1,410,925 1,152,424 1,239,075 15,500,372
2017 1,387,866 1,212,679 1,171,443 1,296,298 1,419,287 1,361,709 1,365,672 1,269,240 1,313,158 1,408,117 1,361,625 1,425,786 15,992,880
2018 1,425,422 1,284,109 1,364,805 888,698 900,404 1,290,409 1,386,302 1,295,057 1,345,935 1,407,026 1,374,831 1,419,832 15,382,830
2019 1,423,364 1,257,891 1,149,066 926,790 1,328,362 1,364,304 1,388,799 1,388,538 1,436,064 1,370,496 1,368,169 1,419,533 15,821,376
2020 1,428,083 1,283,107 567,783 1,223,820 1,423,323 1,361,161 1,383,881 1,384,509 1,356,053 1,415,070 1,382,224 1,431,594 15,640,608
2021 1,433,988 1,274,512 1,256,094 1,201,383 1,411,935 1,352,044 1,393,758 1,373,978 1,353,074 1,387,225 1,354,343 1,414,058 16,206,392
2022 1,410,894 1,186,409 701,970 1,224,682 1,399,041 1,345,947 1,375,176 1,367,515 951,058 1,406,944 1,370,138 1,421,057 15,790,831
2023 1,404,444 1,223,276 1,081,005 1,044,150 1,402,944 1,348,818 1,366,713 1,376,229 1,143,531 1,375,447 1,347,764 1,392,580 15,506,901
2024 1,395,521 1,299,025 655,002 1,367,327 1,404,158 1,347,168 1,376,491 1,381,349 1,180,294 1,397,757 1,313,474 1,366,977 15,484,543
2025 1,357,778 1,219,753 1,127,879 1,272,962 --

Surrounding population

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of Template:Convert, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about Template:Convert, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.[9]

The 2010 U.S. population within Template:Convert of Nine Mile Point was 35,632, an increase of 17.0 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 U.S. population within Template:Convert was 909,523, an increase of 3.2 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Syracuse (36 miles to city center).[10]

1991 site area emergency

On August 13, 1991, a "site area emergency" was declared at the plant. According to Time magazine, this was the third occasion an SAE had been declared at a US nuclear plant.[11]

The emergency was due to an electrical fault which caused a momentary loss of electrical power to the reactor and control room. The operators shut down the reactor in accordance with the emergency plan requirements. There were no injuries or release of radiation as a result of the incident.[12] The reactor left emergency procedures about 13 hours after initiation.

From NRC Information Notice 91-64, Supplement 1:

The facility was operating at full power when a phase-to-ground electrical fault occurred on phase B of the Unit 2 main power transformer. This resulted in a trip of the main generator, main turbine, and reactor. The fault also caused the voltage on electrical distribution phase B buses to drop to about half of its nominal value for approximately 200 milliseconds, after which it returned to normal.
This momentary voltage drop resulted in the simultaneous loss of power output from each of the five Non-Class 1E uninterruptible power supplies. Exide's UPS units have internal continuously charged back-up batteries to prevent a loss of control logic power. Exide's UPS control logic circuitry receives, processes, generates, and sends electrical signals essential for proper UPS operation. However, in this incident the back-up power battery packs were apparently past their useful life and were completely discharged.
The loss of power from the UPS units caused a loss of all the following: the control room annunciators, the safety parameter display system computer, control rod position indication, the plant process computer, the core thermal limits computer, the feedwater control system, some of the lighting for the plant, the plant radio and paging systems, some instrumentation for balance-of-plant systems, and some instrument recorders.
The loss of control room annunciators concurrent with the plant transient resulting from automatic tripping of the main generator, main turbine, and reactor caused the licensee (Niagara Mohawk) to declare a site area emergency in accordance with the site emergency plan. The loss of control rod position indicators and other equipment losses burdened the operators in implementing the emergency procedures. However, the operators shut down the plant in accordance with emergency procedures. About 13 hours after the plant trip, the reactor was placed in a cold shutdown condition; and approximately 1 hour later, the licensee ended the site area emergency.

Seismic risk

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimate of the risk each year of an earthquake intense enough to cause core damage to the reactor at Nine Mile Point was Reactor 1: 1 in 238,095; Reactor 2: 1 in 178,571, according to an NRC study published in August 2010.[13][14]

See also

Template:Stack

Notes

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:U.S. Nuclear Plants Template:Electricity delivery

  1. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. ↑ Bill Dedman, Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors, NBC News, April 14, 2011 http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42555888 [1] Accessed May 1, 2011.
  11. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  12. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. ↑ Bill Dedman, "What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk," NBC News, March 17, 2011 http://www.nbcnews.com/id/42103936 [2] Accessed April 19, 2011.
  14. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Nine_Mile_Point_Nuclear_Generating_Station&oldid=2056843"