Medium Atomic Demolition Munition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "about".

File:Medium Atomic Demolition Munition (with scientists).jpg
Scientists look at a Medium Atomic Demolition Munition. Cutaway casing with warhead inside, code-decoder / firing unit is at left.
File:Medium Atomic Demolition Munition (internal).jpg
Internal components of the MADM setup. From left to right: packing container, W45 warhead, code-decoder unit, firing unit.

Medium Atomic Demolition Munition (MADM) was a tactical nuclear weapon developed by the United States during the Cold War. It was an atomic demolition munition (ADM), a combat engineering device for demolition of structures and for battlefield shaping. The device contained a W45 warhead with an estimated yield of Template:Convert. Each MADM weighed Template:Convert in its transportation container. They were deployed between 1962 and 1986.

In service, the MADM was known as the M167, M172 and M175 Atomic Demolition Charges (ADCs).[1]

History

The history of the MADM began in 1954 with the proposal for a light-weight multi-purpose warhead. Its predecessor, the first atomic demolition munition (ADM), was deployed in the same year.[2] This was a low-yield weapon (Template:Convert) used by special forces and commando teams to destroy enemy infrastructure such as bridges tunnels, and harbors, among others.[2] The MADM warhead was designed to be economical in nuclear material, having a diameter of less than Template:Convert, and it was hoped that the device could be broken down into sub-Template:Convert components for carriage and assembly in the field.Template:Sfn

The program languished for several years, with Los Alamos and Sandia in a joint letter suggesting that warheads in the range of Template:Convert were possible. At one point, the W25 warhead for the AIR-2 Genie missile was considered for the application.Template:Sfn The program for the W45 was authorized in January 1956. In addition to MADM, the program was to develop warheads for Nike I, Little John, Terrier and ASROC.Template:Sfn

Possible devices for the program were tested in Operations Redwing and Plumbbob. In August 1956, it was decided that the ASROC warhead would be assigned to LASL as the XW-44, while the other warheads including MADM would be given to the University of California Radiation Laboratory (UCRL) (now Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) with the designation XW-45.Template:Sfn

In February 1957, it was believed that the weapon could be design released by mid-1958 with production beginning a year later. In March 1957, it was suggested that the W44 and W45 programs be consolidated. This proposal was later abandoned.Template:Sfn At this point, it was believed the design would have a maximum diameter of Template:Convert, a length of Template:Convert, and a weight of Template:Convert. Major components of the weapon were sourced from other weapon systems.Template:Sfn

In September 1957, the warhead operational availability date was delayed by 14 months.Template:Sfn In February 1958, for still-classified reasons, the weapon received a significant redesign and a new developmental name: XW-45-X1.Template:Sfn This, however, increased the weapon diameter to Template:Convert and made the warhead incompatible with Little John without substantial redesign. In the interest of economics and stockpile simplification, it was decided to revert to the original XW-45 design in February 1959.Template:Sfn

In January 1960, the MADM version of the W45 was assigned the name W45 Mod 1. This version of the warhead was only different from the W45 Mod 0 used in Little John and Terrier in that it had no environmental sensing device, the ADM role having precluded the possibility of such a device.Template:Sfn Instead, the warhead received a three-digit combination padlock to restrict access to the device.Template:Sfn War reserve production was achieved in April 1962.Template:Sfn

In October 1963, the army informed the Atomic Energy Commission that the usefulness of the weapon was limited by the inability to emplace the weapon underwater or in backfilled holes. Sandia and Livermore replied in December 1963, proposing a watertight case for the weapon featuring waterproof cables and connectors. A prototype was demonstrated in January 1963 and production of the case was authorized the following month.Template:Sfn

At about the same time, it was proposed that the weapon be fitted with a Permissive Action Link (PAL), consisting of a five-digit coded switch. This was accepted and implemented on the subsequent W45 Mod 2. When the Mod 2 weapon was incorporated into its new protective case, the weapon became the W45 Mod 3.Template:Sfn Early production of the Mod 3 began in July 1965.Template:Sfn

The MADM was retired in 1984.[3]

Design

File:MADM emplacement.jpg
Diagram showing underground emplacement of the Medium Atomic Demolition Munition

The weapon was a boosted, externally-initiated device.Template:Sfn It was allegedly a Swan-type weapon utilizing an air-lens.[4] The yield was reportedly Template:Convert.[3]

The weapon was designed so it could be detonated by a timer of up to 21 days, by radio or by field wire,Template:Sfn and featured a waterproof protective case.Template:Sfn

In its waterproof case, the weapon was Template:Convert long, Template:Convert wide, Template:Convert high and weighed Template:Convert.[1]

MADM use

Offensive use

ADM employment manuals describe the use of ADMs tactically in both offensive and defensive operations.Template:Sfn

In offensive operations, ADMs are described as being useful for improving flank and rear security of a unit, impeding counterattacks, and assisting in enemy entrapment.Template:Sfn

Engineering and defensive use

ADM employment manuals describe the use of ADMs defensively for combat engineering purposes. Possible targets described include bridges, dams, canals, tunnels, airfields, railroad marshaling yards, ports and industrial plants, and power facilities.Template:Sfn

Extensive tables were provided to enable the selection of the correct yield for each particular target. These tables accounted for various employment particulars such as depth of burial, fallout considerations, and minimum safe separation distances between adjacent weapons and personnel.Template:Sfn

See also

Template:Sister project

References

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

External links

Template:United States nuclear devices

Template:Nuclear-weapon-stub Template:ColdWar-stub

  1. a b Template:Cite report
  2. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".