Lord paramount
Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Template:Feudal status A lord paramount is a term of art in feudal law describing an overlord who holds his own fief from no superior lord. It thus describes a person who holds allodial title, owing no socage or feudal obligations such as military service. This was distinguished from a mesne lord who held his own fief from a superior.
Script error: No such module "anchor".
Name
The term paramount derives from the Anglo-Norman Script error: No such module "Lang". ("up above") or Script error: No such module "Lang". ("atop the mountain") and was used to indicate the lord who was the highest authority for a given location.Template:Efn Similar terminology was used for the vassals of mesne lords, who were considered "paravail" from Script error: No such module "Lang". ("in the valley"). This latter term, however, was confused by later lawyers with "avail" in its senses of help, assistance, and profit and was eventually applied only to the actual occupiers or tenants who worked the land themselves.[1] The vassal of a lord paramount, meanwhile, was a tenant-in-chief.
Instances
Generally speaking, under English law after the 1066 Norman Conquest, only the sovereignTemplate:Mdashthe king or queenTemplate:Mdashwas truly lord paramount in its larger sense. All other legal title to land was held through them, particularly after the abolition of most unusual feudal titles and obligations under the 1660 Statute of Tenures. The only major exceptionTemplate:Mdashcontinuing to the present dayTemplate:Mdashis the protection of the privileges of the duke of Cornwall as lord paramount over Cornish lands.[2] A similar situation exists regarding the Duchy of Lancaster but is purely notional, the duchy being held in permanent personal union with the Crown.[2]
Nonetheless, the term does appear in some other contexts. The marquess of Exeter holds the title of hereditary Lord Paramount of Peterborough. The peculiar way in which the baron holding the Lordship of Bowland oversaw himselfTemplate:Mdashsome of his estates notionally owing service to othersTemplate:Mdashhas also been described in terms of paramouncy and obligation. (The situation was rendered still more academic when it was subsumed first into the Earldom of Lancaster in 1311 and then into the Duchy of Lancaster as an estate held by the Crown in 1351, which gave rise to the title of "Lord King of Bowland".)[3] The title is also sometimes broadly applied to any overlord.
The concept continued to be invoked in other common law jurisdictions, including New York in the 1852 case of De Peyster v. Michael[4] and Australia in the 1992 case of Mabo v Queensland. In the latter case, the High Court affirmed that Elizabeth II was lord paramount over all formal land tenure in Australia while simultaneously establishing the concept of a native title over areas not explicitly legally held by others and continuously occupied by aboriginal people.[5][6]
See also
- Allodial title
- Escheat
- Feudalism
- Mesne lord
- Native title in Australia
- Overlord
- Seignory
- Sovereignty
- Quia Emptores
- Tenures Abolition Act 1660
Notes
References
Citations
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
- ↑ 6 NY 467, quoted in 28 Am. Jur. 2nd, Estates, §§ 3 & 4.
- ↑ Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23, (1992) 175 CLR 1 per Brennan J para.51.
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"., pp. 5–7, 402.
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Bibliography
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Script error: No such module "template wrapper".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
