Lloyd deMause

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Template:Third-partyScript error: No such module "Infobox".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Lloyd deMause (pronounced de-Moss; September 19, 1931 – April 23, 2020) was an American lay psychoanalyst and social historian, best known for his pioneering work in the field of psychohistory.

He graduated from Columbia College and did graduate work in political science at Columbia University and later trained as a psychoanalyst. He taught psychohistory at the City University of New York. He is the founder of the Association for Psychohistory[1], which publishes the Journal of Psychohistory.

Psychohistory

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Beginning in the 1970s, DeMause began conceiving of psychohistory, a field of study of the psychological motivations of historical events, and their associated patterns of behavior. It seeks to understand the emotional origin of the social and political behavior of groups and nations—past and present—by analyzing events in childhood and the family, especially child abuse.

Psychogenic Modes Proposed by Lloyd deMause

DeMause proposed a taxonomy of six historical childrearing styles, which he termed psychogenic modes, arguing that parental capacity for empathy has increased progressively over the course of history and that these shifts have produced corresponding changes in psychological development and social behavior.[2] Each mode, in deMause's framework, produces a distinct psychoclass, a type of personality formed by a particular childrearing environment and transmitted to subsequent generations through parenting practices.[3] In the opening paragraph of "The Evolution of Childhood," the lead chapter of The History of Childhood (1974) [4], deMause wrote: Template:Quote

The six modes, in deMause's chronological sequence from earliest to most recent, are as follows:

Mode Childrearing characteristics Historical manifestations (per deMause)
Infanticidal Ritual sacrifice of children; high infanticide rates; incest; bodily mutilation; rape of children. Selective killing of female newborns prominent. Documented, in deMause's account, among tribal societies, Mesoamerican civilizations, and the Inca; in Assyrian and Canaanite religious practice; and among Phoenicians, Carthaginians, and other early states. deMause distinguished a "late" variant, associated with classical Greeks and Romans, in which outright infanticide gave way to selective exposure of unwanted newborns.
Abandoning Routine infanticide replaced by abandonment; prolonged swaddling; wet-nursing; children placed in monasteries or apprenticeships; fosterage. Associated by deMause with early Christian societies; he argued that the theological concept of original sin functionally displaced sacrificial practice while leaving children exposed to sexual abuse in monastic and domestic settings.[5]
Ambivalent Children permitted to survive but frequently rejected emotionally; early child-instruction manuals appeared; rudimentary child- protection laws introduced; children treated as erotic objects by adults. Associated with the later Middle Ages; deMause linked the emergence of this mode to the generation immediately preceding the Renaissance.[3]
Intrusive Parents attempted to control rather than abandon children; early toilet training; repression of child sexuality; swaddling and wet- nursing declined; Puritan and Calvinist disciplinary literature proliferated. [3] Associated with sixteenth-century Europe, particularly England. deMause argued that the decline of swaddling and wet-nursing in this period contributed to accelerated scientific development.
Socializing Parents sought to instill internalized values and obedience rather than to control the body directly; guilt, humiliation, and compulsory schooling employed; corporal punishment with objects and religious hellfire threats diminished; fathers began to participate in younger children's upbringing. Associated with the eighteenth century onward. deMause identified this as the dominant model of child-rearing in North America and Western Europe as of the early 1970s.[3]
Helping Parents adopted a role of supporting children toward the child's own developmental goals rather than socializing them into fulfilling parental expectations; physical punishment absent; unconditional expression of affection emphasized. Associated by deMause with a minority of parents in Western societies from the mid-twentieth century. Correlated in his account with the children's rights movement, natural childbirth, attachment parenting, and related practices.[3]

deMause presented the sequence as applying to what he characterized as the most advanced Western nations, while noting that earlier modes persist alongside later ones in all societies. He cited reports of selective abandonment and exposure of female infants in parts of Asia and North Africa as evidence that infanticidal- mode practices remained active as of the 1970s.[2] deMause argued that the five modes preceding the helping mode are associated with the development of psychological disorders ranging from psychoses to neuroses.[3]

File:Lloyd deMause Psychogenic Modes Chart.png
Psychogenic Modes Image showcasing the emergence of Lloyd deMause's individual theories.

The psychogenic mode sequence is illustrated in Foundations of Psychohistory with the chart shown above. The chart visualizes the estimated chronological emergence of each mode in what deMause termed the most advanced nations, derived from contemporary accounts in historical records.[3]

deMause argued that if the helping mode were to become universal, interpersonal violence, war, and magical thinking would diminish correspondingly, as the psychological conflicts generated by abusive childrearing would cease to be transmitted across generations.[3]

The Concept of Group Fantasy

Alongside his childhood history framework, deMause developed the concept of group fantasy — a collective psychological phenomenon in which a psychoclass's shared childhood experiences and the conflicts arising from them are expressed in political behavior, religious practice, and other aspects of social life. deMause treated group fantasy as the mechanism linking childhood psychology to historical events at the level of nations and movements.[3]Script error: No such module "Side box".

Publications

DeMause published over 90 scholarly articles and several books.

Books

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Articles (selection)

  • DeMause, Lloyd (1974): The Evolution of Childhood. In: History of Childhood Quarterly: The Journal of Psychohistory, 1 (4), p. 503-575. (Comments and reply: p. 576-606)
  • DeMause, Lloyd (1987): The History of Childhood in Japan. In: The Journal of Psychohistory, 15 (2), p. 147-151.
  • DeMause, Lloyd (1988): On Writing Childhood History. In: The Journal of Psychohistory, 16 (2), p. 35-71.
  • DeMause, Lloyd (1989): The Role of Adaptation and Selection in Psychohistorical Evolution. In: The Journal of Psychohistory, 16 (4), p. 355-372 (Comments and reply: p. S. 372–404).
  • DeMause, Lloyd (1990): The History of Child Assault. In: The Journal of Psychohistory, 18 (1), p. 1-29.
  • DeMause, Lloyd (1991): The Universality of Incest. In: The Journal of Psychohistory, 19 (1), p. 123-164.
  • DeMause, Lloyd (1997): The Psychogenic Theory of History. In: The Journal of Psychohistory, 25 (1), p. 112-183.

See also

Notes

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c d e f g h i Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

External links

Script error: No such module "Side box".

Script error: No such module "Authority control".