HMS Spiteful (1899)

Template:Infobox ship imageTemplate:Infobox ship careerTemplate:Infobox ship characteristics

HMS Spiteful was a Template:Sclass torpedo boat destroyer built at Jarrow, England, by Palmers Shipbuilding and Iron Company for the Royal Navy and launched in 1899. Specified to be able to steam at 30 knots, she spent her entire career serving in the seas around the British Isles.

In 1904 Spiteful's boilers were modified to burn fuel oil. Tests were conducted by the Royal Navy in that year, comparing her performance using oil directly with that of a similar ship (HMS Peterel) using coal, in which it was proved that burning oil offered significant advantages. This led to the adoption of oil as the source of power for all warships built for the Royal Navy from 1912. In 1913 Spiteful was classified as a Template:Sclass2. She was sold and scrapped in 1920.

Design and construction

HMS Spiteful was one of about 60 torpedo boat destroyers built for use by the Royal Navy between 1893 and 1900 to the specifications of the Admiralty; she was also the 50th ship built for the Admiralty by Palmers Shipbuilding and Iron Company, and the 12th torpedo boat destroyer built by them.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn By the time of her construction, Palmers had come to be regarded as one of the "more successful builders [of this type of ship]".Template:Sfn She was laid down on 12 January 1898 at Palmers' Jarrow shipyard and launched on 11 January 1899, at a cost of £50,977. She arrived at Portsmouth for completion on 31 August 1899, and this was achieved in February 1900.Template:Refn

Her design was a development of that for Palmers' Template:Sclass torpedo boat destroyers, which had been completed between 1897 and 1899, although most changes were minor.Template:Sfn For example, whereas the Star-class ships had three funnels, of which the middle one was more substantial, Spiteful had four, of which the central two were grouped closely together.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn SpitefulTemplate:'s length overall was Template:Convert, her beam was Template:Convert and her draught was Template:Convert.Template:Sfn Her light displacement was 400 tons (406.4 tonnes).Template:Sfn

In common with similar Royal Navy ships of the time, SpitefulTemplate:'s forecastle was of the "turtle-back" type with a rounded top: this design was intended to keep the forecastle clear of sea water, but in practice had the adverse effect of digging a ship's bow into the sea when it was rough, thereby making ships lose speed, besides making them "wet and uncomfortable".Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn Wetness was mitigated by screening across the rear of the forecastle and around the forward gun position, a raised platform below which was the enclosed conning tower.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn A foremast stood behind the conning position and was fitted with a derrick.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn She was armed with a QF 12-pounder gun located in the forward gun position; five QF 6-pounder guns, four of which were arranged along her sides and one located centrally on a raised platform towards her stern, as a rear gun; and a pair of Template:Convert torpedo tubes on a horizontally rotating mount located on deck towards the stern, ahead of the rear gun.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn The crew numbered 63 officers and men, for whom the accommodation on this type of ship was "very cramped; usually the captain had a small cabin but ... other officers lived in the wardroom."Template:SfnTemplate:Refn The remainder of the crew slept in hammocks.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn As ordered Spiteful probably carried four boats, comprising a gig, a dinghy and two lifeboats of the Berthon type.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn

Admiralty specifications in force at the time of her construction required that she should be able to steam at 30 knots, and from this she was one of a group of torpedo boat destroyers known informally as "30-knotters".Template:Sfn SpitefulTemplate:'s propulsion was through two propellers, each driven by one of two triple expansion steam engines that were powered by four coal-fired Reed water tube boilers operated at 250 pounds per square inch (1,724 kilopascals) and could produce Template:Convert indicated horsepower (IHP).Template:Refn In ships of her type the boilers were installed in a line fore-and-aft and in pairs, so that in each pair the furnace doors faced each other: thus one group of stokers could tend two boilers simultaneously, and only two boiler rooms, also known as stokeholds, were required.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn In sea trials it was found that, when run at 29.9 knots, she consumed Template:Convert of coal per IHP per hour, which was considered low, and a speed of 30.371 knots was "easily maintained".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn At 13.05 knots it was found that her capacity of about 91 tons (92.5 tonnes) of coal, consumed at a rate of Template:Convert per IHP per hour, gave her a steaming range of about 4,000 nautical miles.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn

Torpedo boat destroyers of the 30-knotter specification featured watertight bulkheads that enabled them to remain afloat despite damage to their hulls, which were thin and lightly built for speed.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Conversely the thinness of their hulls meant that they were easily damaged by stormy seas and careless handling.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Those that were based in British ports, as Spiteful was, were originally painted black overall, but they would have been painted grey by about 1916, from which point they would also have had their pendant numbers painted on their bows.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn Spiteful and her sister ship Template:HMS, also built by Palmers and launched later the same year, formed the Template:Sclass.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn

At the time of their construction a specification of 30 knots made for a fast warship, but:

[t]here seems to have been little rational discussion of why high speed was necessary ... Speed was seen as a good thing in itself. It became a subject for international competition. The specialist torpedo boat firms all competed for the fastest speed on water. ... [However] very few of the "30-knotters" could make more than about 26 knots, if that, in service and this was only in calm conditions.

— Template:Comma separated entries

Otherwise,

[t]he best advertisement for [the 30-knotters] lay in the fact that they were worked very hard during [the First World War] and, though most of them were twenty years old by 1919, they remained efficient. This [also] speaks well for their builders ...

— Template:Comma separated entries

These builders were all private British enterprises that had previously specialised in building torpedo boats, and, regarding their designs for 30-knotters, it was specified that they should be given "[a]s free a hand as possible".Template:Sfn In 1996 David Lyon, curator of ships’ plans at the National Maritime Museum, wrote that Palmers' torpedo boat destroyers in particular "eventually would, by common consent, be considered the best all-rounders of all".Template:Sfn

Service history

A contemporary artist's impression of the collision between Spiteful and the barge Preciosa in 1905

A contemporary artist's impression of the collision between Spiteful and the barge Preciosa on 4 April 1905: two of PreciosaTemplate:'s crew died.

Spiteful always served within the vicinity of the British Isles.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn From 10 July to 3 August 1900 she was engaged in a naval exercise conducted in the Irish Sea, during which she was deemed to have been put out of action.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn From 11 January 1901 to 24 February 1902 at the latest she was captained by Commander Douglas Nicholson, who later became a vice admiral. In February 1901 she ran aground near the Isle of Wight, damaging her propellers, and was taken to Portsmouth dockyard for overhaul. On 23 October the same year, while off the north-eastern coast of England, she had a collision with her sister ship Peterel, in which her stem was twisted and her bow "partly torn away".Template:SfnTemplate:Refn On 4 April 1905, while steaming at 22 knots near Yarmouth on the Isle of Wight, she collided with the barge Preciosa, which was carrying bags of cement. Damage to SpitefulTemplate:'s bow and forward superstructure was severe, but that damage was not greater was attributed to her "light build"; one of SpitefulTemplate:'s crew was slightly injured, but the barge sank and two of her crew drowned.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn On 5 August 1907, while she was raising steam at Cowes on the Isle of Wight, fuel oil was released under pressure from a disconnected burner, causing flames to fill the rear boiler room: two members of the crew were killed and two were injured.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn The magazines were flooded to protect them from the fire and, although it caused no structural damage, Spiteful was later towed to Portsmouth for inspection. She was part of the Portsmouth flotilla of the Home Fleet at the time. The event prompted the Admiralty to issue new instructions on the handling of fuel oil in its ships, particularly after overhaul.Template:Sfn

refer to caption

A model of HMS Spiteful, built in about 1904: whereas the model has three funnels, the ship had four, with the central two grouped as a pair.

In 1913 Spiteful was classified as a Template:Sclass2.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn From June 1914, one month before the outbreak of the First World War, the Royal Navy's Navy List records that she was based at Portsmouth as a tender for HMS Vernon, the Admiralty's torpedo training school: her "Chief Artificer Engineer" was based there, rather than on board.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn From August 1914 she was listed as still based at Portsmouth, but no longer as a tender for Vernon, although her chief artificer engineer remained there.Template:Sfn From June 1915 she was listed as part of the Portsmouth Local Defence Flotilla.Template:Sfn On 6 September 1916 she sighted a German submarine off Cape Barfleur, in the English Channel, forcing it to dive.Template:Sfn On 18 January 1917 Spiteful was despatched from Portsmouth with three other destroyers to go to the aid of Template:HMS, another destroyer that had been disabled by an enemy torpedo while hunting German submarines in mid-Channel south-east of the Isle of Wight; Ferret was recovered to Portsmouth.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn On 27 August 1917 Spiteful was reported entering Lough Swilly, in north-western Ireland, along with destroyers Template:HMS, Template:HMS and Template:HMS. From May to December 1918, by which time the war had ended, Spiteful was again listed as part of the Portsmouth Local Defence Flotilla, but also as a tender for "HMS Victory", as Portsmouth Naval Barracks were named at the time.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn From January to April 1919 she was listed only as based at Portsmouth, but in May that year she was listed as being based there without an officer in command.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn She did not appear in the Navy List again until January 1920, when she was listed as "To Be Sold".Template:Sfn This occurred on 14 September 1920, and she was broken up at Hayes' yard, Porthcawl.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Fuel oil

Spiteful was instrumental in the Royal Navy's adoption of fuel oil as a source of power in place of coal. Her boilers were modified to burn only fuel oil as part of ongoing experiments and, on 7–8 December 1904, "vitally important" comparative trials were carried out near the Isle of Wight with SpitefulTemplate:'s sister ship Peterel burning coal, in which Spiteful performed significantly better.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Refn Problems with the production of smoke were surmounted so that using oil produced no more smoke than coal, and it was found that the ship's crew could be reduced, since fewer were required in the boiler rooms.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Whereas Peterel required six stokers during the trials, Spiteful required only three boiler-room crew; while PeterelTemplate:'s crew had to dispose of 1.5 tons (1.52 tonnes) of ash and clinker, Spiteful produced no such waste.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn Further, while Peterel took 1.5 hours to prepare for steaming, Spiteful took 10 minutes.Template:Sfn In June 1906, the journal Scientific American journal reported that Spiteful was being used by the Admiralty to train engine-room crews in the operation of oil-burning equipment.Template:Sfn

That a navy's reliance on coal entailed problems of logistics and strategy was understood well before the trials took place:

We have, at sea, command of very high speeds, but we pay a ruinous price for the luxury. [At a chosen] speed we can steam long distances, but if we are hustled, we draw heavily on [that ability]. A fleet with many coal bases can … hustle another into inability to [choose its destination] – we can … head off [a] fleet from astern. This limitation of distance capacity, [and] invisible control over the destination of an enemy, … gives a new meaning to the word "blockade" … That coal can be carried with a fleet and distributed under certain conditions is obvious, [but] to place reliance on [it] is out of the question.

— Template:Comma separated entries

Thus Bacon argued that a navy reliant on coal must have a "coal strategy".Template:Sfn Using fuel oil instead removed this strategic limitation and offered significant advantages:

[Oil] had double the thermal content of coal so that boilers could be smaller and ships could travel twice as far. Greater speed was possible and oil burned with less smoke so the fleet would not reveal its presence as quickly. Oil could be stored in tanks anywhere, allowing more efficient design of ships, and it could be transferred through pipes without reliance on stokers, reducing manning. Refueling [sic] at sea was feasible, which provided greater flexibility.

— Template:Comma separated entries

In addition, construction costs for an oil-powered warship were lower by an average of 12.4% – a destroyer would be cheaper by a third – and carrying oil instead of coal meant that a warship's armaments and armour could be heavier.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Although the trials of 1904 proved the superiority of fuel oil over coal in powering warships, they did not lead to the immediate abandonment of coal as a source of power by the Royal Navy. While Britain's internal supply of coal was plentiful, it had no such supply of oil, either domestically or within its empire.Template:Sfn William Palmer, who was First Lord of the Admiralty in 1904, regarded a change to oil as "impossible", for reasons of availability.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn This took time to overcome, but it was achieved through foreign policy and government activity in the oil market, beginning with the Royal Commission on Fuel and Engines of 1912. This was established by Winston Churchill, who was First Lord of the Admiralty at the time.Template:Sfn The Navy committed itself to change in the same year, when all of the ships that it set out to procure were designed to use fuel oil.Template:SfnTemplate:Refn