Front Line First

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Use British English Template:Use dmy dates Script error: No such module "Infobox".Template:Template otherScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Wikidata image Front Line First: The Defence Cost Study was a UK programme of defence cuts announced on 14 July 1994 by then Defence Secretary Malcolm Rifkind. Front Line First was announced four years after Options for Change, which was a military draw-down as a result of the end of the Cold War, often described as the "peace dividend". Critics such as the Labour defence spokesman Donald Anderson argued that the cuts were driven by the Treasury,[1] however Rifkind argued that the front line of the armed forces was not affected and it was support staff and assets which were being cut; Rifkind stated that one of the major conclusion of the study was that the "Ministry of Defence and other headquarters at all levels are too large, too top heavy and too bureaucratic."[2]

Main changes

New equipment orders

  • Confirmation of order for 259 Challenger II tanks.
  • Confirmation of upgrade of 142 Tornado GR1s to GR4 standard.
  • Confirmation of order for 7 Sandown-class minehunters.
  • Intent to spend £300 million on laser-guided bombs and laser designators.
  • Intent to order 400,000 rounds of 51mm from British Aerospace's Royal Ordnance.
  • A new class of nuclear submarine would be ordered, the Batch 2 Trafalgar class (what would become the Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".s).
  • A new class of amphibious assault ships would be ordered (what would become the Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".).
  • Procurement of Tomahawk cruise missile to be studied.

See also

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b Template:Cite hansard

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

External links

Template:UK Defence Review