East Bodish languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Infobox".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

The East Bodish languages are a small group of non-Tibetic Bodish languages spoken in eastern Bhutan and adjacent areas of Tibet and India. They include:

Overview

"Bod" (བོད) is the endonym for Tibet.

The term "East Bodish" first appeared in Shafer (1955).[1] He classified "Dwags" (Takpa) into the "East Bodish Unit" within the Bodish Branch of Sino-Tibetan.[2]

Template:Tree list

  • Bodic Section
    • Bodish Branch
      • West Bodish Unit
      • Central Bodish Unit
      • South Bodish Unit
      • East Bodish Unit
    • Gurung Branch
    • Tshangla Branch
    • Rgyalrong Branch

Template:Tree list/end

Michael Aris mentioned the "Bum-thang" language spoken in areas such as "Tongsa", "Mangdelung", Kheng, and "Kurtö", which retains "the most archaic features of all the Bhutanese languages"[3] George van Driem states that Bumthang, Kheng and Kurtöp could be considered dialects of a single language.Template:Sfnp Bhutanese anthropologist Kelzang Tashi treats Bumthang, Kheng, and Kurtöp as dialects of the language spoken by Üchogpa, which translates to the people of Central Bhutan[4]

The East Bodish languages do not share certain lexical innovations with Old Tibetan (e.g. Tibetan bdun; Takpa nis for 'seven').[5] The branch is not a subgroup of Tibetic as defined by Nicolas Tournadre.[6]

George van Driem initially proposed that 'Ole belonged to the group, but later decided that it belonged to a group of its own.[7]

Although the East Bodish languages are closely related, Tshangla and related languages of eastern Bhutan, also called "Monpa" and predating Dzongkha, form a sister branch not to the East Bodish group, but to its parent Bodish branch.[8][9] Thus the ambiguous term "Monpa" risks separating languages that should be grouped together, whereas grouping languages together that are quite distinct.[10] Zakhring is apparently also related, though strongly influenced by Miju or a similar language.[11]

Timotheus Bodt excludes Dakpa and Dzala, which he considers to be a single language, from the East Bodish languages. He finds Dakpa–Dzala to be closer to Tibetan than to other East Bodish languages. His resulting taxonomy is as follows:

Script error: No such module "Clade".

Common characteristics in Bumthang, Kheng and Kurtöp

Bodt lists the following phonetic innovations undergone in Bumthang, Kheng, and Kurtöp in contrast to Dakpa–Dzala and Tibetan. Exceptions to these sound laws may be attributed to Tibetic contact.

Vowel height swaps

  • Proto-Bodic *u became o in open syllables, but also conversely Proto-Bodic *o became u in most syllables (including open syllables).
  • Proto-Bodic *i became e in open syllables.
  • Any Proto-Bodic vowel following a palatalized consonant became Script error: No such module "IPA"..

Changes to lateral consonants and clusters

  • *l̥, which Bodt believes to be an outright Script error: No such module "IPA"., assibilated to Script error: No such module "IPA"..
  • *l became Script error: No such module "IPA". before *a, *o and *u.
  • *bl- became Script error: No such module "IPA"., possibly through an intermediate Script error: No such module "IPA"..
  • *kl- simplifies to *l-.
  • *gl- becomes Script error: No such module "IPA". and kʰl- becomes Script error: No such module "IPA"..
  • *pl- does not have a consistent outcome; it can in one word develop an affricate or fricative but in another word remain unchanged.

Other changes

  • *sw- > *kw- (in Bumthang, the *w is absorbed by the following vowel to form a rounded vowel and then lost).

Shared retentions

  • Bumthang, Kheng and Kurtöp preserve onset *w, instead of changing it to Script error: No such module "IPA". like in Tibetan.
  • They also do not palatalize *s before *i.

Internal classification

File:Languages of Bhutan with labels.svg
Languages of Bhutan, including the East Bodish languages

Hyslop (2010)[12] classifies the East Bodish languages as follows.

Template:Tree list

Template:Tree list/end

She regards the Dakpa–Dzala and Bumthangic subgroups as secure, and the placement of Phobjip and Chali as more tentative.[13]

Lu (2002) divides the "Menba language" (门巴语) into the following subdivisions:[14]

Template:Tree list

Template:Tree list/end

Reconstruction

Hyslop (2014)[15] reconstructs the following Proto-East Bodish forms.

<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />

  • *kwa 'tooth'
  • *kra 'hair'
  • *kak 'blood'
  • *kʰrat 'waist'
  • *lak 'hand'
  • *ná 'nose'
  • *pOskOm (?) 'knee'
  • *rOs 'bone'
  • *gO- 'head'
  • *mE- 'eye'
  • *kram 'otter'
  • *ta 'horse'
  • *kʰa- 'hen'
  • *wam 'bear'
  • *kʰwi 'dog'
  • *kʰaça 'deer'
  • *zV 'eat'
  • *ra 'come'
  • *gal 'go'
  • *lok 'pour'
  • *dot 'sleep'
  • *bi 'give'
  • *kʰar 'white'
  • *mla 'arrow'
  • *gor 'stone'
  • *kʰwe/*tsʰi 'water'
  • *rO (?) 'wind'
  • *On (?) 'baby'
  • *daŋ 'yesterday'
  • *néŋ 'year'
  • *da- 'today'
  • *tʰek 'one'
  • *sum 'three'
  • *ble 'four'
  • *laŋa 'five'
  • *grok 'six'
  • *nís 'seven'
  • *gʲat 'eight'
  • *dOgO 'nine'
  • *kʰal(tʰek) 'twenty'
  • *ŋa '1.SG'
  • *i/*nVn '2.SG'
  • *kʰi/*ba '3.SG'
  • *-ma 'FUT'
  • *lo 'Q.COP'

Additional reconstructions can be found in Hyslop (2016).[16]

Further reading

  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Template:Cite thesis
  2. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. Template:Cite thesis
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2010. On the internal phylogeny of East Bodish. Paper presented at the 5th NEILS meeting, Gauhati University 12–14 February 2010.
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2016. East Bodish reconstructions in a comparative light Template:Webarchive. Fourth Workshop on Sino-Tibetan Languages of Southwest China (STLS-2016). University of Washington, Seattle, September 8–10, 2016.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Template:Bodic languages Template:Sino-Tibetan branches