Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan
Template:Short description Template:Use American English Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox aircraft
The Curtiss-Wright C-76 Caravan (company designation CW-27) was an American all-wood military transport aircraft. The C-76 was intended as a substitute standard aircraft in the event of expected wartime shortages of light alloys.[1] However, both prototype and production aircraft failed several critical flight and static tests, and after U.S. aluminum production proved sufficient for wartime defense requirements, orders for the C-76 were cancelled and it did not enter production.[2] Although it did not go into its main production, 25 pre-production and prototype aircraft of various types were constructed during development. The factory where it might have been produced made more C-46 Commandoes for which the C-76 would have been a substitute.
Design and development
In 1941, Curtiss-Wright was contracted by the United States Army Air Forces to design and construct an all-wood military transport aircraft, with performance specifications meeting or exceeding that of the Douglas C-47 Skytrain then in service.[1][3]
The Curtiss-Wright CW-27 was designed by Curtiss-Wright's chief designer George A. Page, Jr. as a high-wing, twin-engine, cargo transport aircraft, utilizing plywood construction with a tricycle undercarriage. Though the British de Havilland Mosquito had successfully employed a ply construction using a balsa wood core and birch hardwood exterior, Curtiss-Wright engineers, using research provided by Forest Products Laboratory,[4] rejected this approach, insisting instead on a ply construction of dense mahogany, which greatly increased the plane's weight.[5] At Curtiss' request, Army Materiel Command laid in large supplies of mahogany, and a number of furniture manufacturers, including the Baldwin Piano Company, were subcontracted to build components for the aircraft, which would be assembled at Curtiss-Wright's new defense plant in Louisville, Kentucky.[2][5]
A radial engine was mounted on each wing, and the aircraft was capable of carrying 23 personnel or a cargo payload. The Caravan had a nose section that swung out to the right to enable outsize loading, including a jeep or small artillery pieces.[6]
The original contract called for 11 YC-76 preproduction aircraft, and the first aircraft would be built and tested at Curtiss-Wright's St. Louis, Missouri Division plant.[3] Subsequently, orders for five C-76 production aircraft and nine revised YC-76As were placed by the USAAF, with line production to commence at the Curtiss-Wright plant in Louisville as well as a Higgins Aircraft Michoud Factory Field in Michoud near New Orleans, Louisiana.[2][3][7] To keep the plywood flexible during construction the factory was kept hot and damp.[8] The prototype YC-76 first flew on 1 May 1943.[3]
Only five production aircraft were completed in 1943: three from Curtiss-Wright's St. Louis Division, and two from a new plant at Louisville, Kentucky, which was finished in May 1942.[2][3][8] The Higgins Aircraft Co. contract was cancelled by the Army on 3 August 1943 before the Higgins factory in New Orleans had been completed, and Higgins was awarded another contract to produce the C-46 Commando.[7]
Operational history
The first flight of the YC-76 prototype took place on 3 May 1943.[2] The C-76 proved severely underpowered from the start, with a cruising speed of Script error: No such module "convert"., a service ceiling of Script error: No such module "convert"., a range of only Script error: No such module "convert"., and a cargo capacity of under Script error: No such module "convert".. Colonel J.W. Sessums, a USAAF officer at the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field, later related:
Compared to other cargo aircraft then coming into service, the C-76 was already obsolescent, even allowing for its war-priority method of construction. In addition, the C-76 failed a number of critical flight tests.[9] It was discovered in testing that the C-76 was unstable when not carrying a cargo load; in order to obtain a stable center of gravity, the plane had to be ballasted beyond its maximum permissible gross takeoff weight.[5][9] At any speed, or in any gusting wind, the C-76's elevators would flap back and forth violently.[9] The wing structure failed in eight separate static tests, sometimes with a load as low as 40% of the wing's rated capacity.[10] The wing failures were attributed by some sources to the failure of the fasteners used to secure the wood components of the aircraft.[9][8] Numerous additional fasteners, metal stirrups, and wood ply reinforcements were added to the structure in an effort to strengthen it, thereby increasing the plane's overall weight.[9] At the Louisville plant, Curtiss line workers would later recall two C-76 production planes that were kept for some time in the assembly building, with one plane cannibalized to keep the other in flyable condition.[8]
On 10 May 1943, the first YC-76 constructed at the Louisville, Kentucky plant, 42-86918, lost its tail unit, due to a lack of securing bolts, during a test flight, crashing at Okolona, Kentucky, killing three Curtiss-Wright test crew.[2][11][12]
As war priority measures designed to increase aluminum production proved successful, the feared shortage of light alloys never materialized.[2] Moreover, USAAF Training Command had begun to forward widespread complaints of insufficient service life on their wooden-winged Fairchild PT-19 primary trainers when exposed to high heat in training bases located in Texas and Florida.[5] The War Department cancelled its orders for the C-76 on 3 August 1943.[11][13] The Sara Clark Collection, National Archives, Record Group 342, Box 2719, document the disposition of the 25 YC-76 aircraft as Articles #1, #3, # 4, and #5 were placed in the "Z" category, ZC-76, due to the poor gluing conditions and assembly procedures by subcontractors found through a Material Division inspection of the subcontractors work. These aircraft were assigned to the Technical Training Command and used for ground purposes only. Article #2 was destroyed in static testing at Wright Field. Article #6 was lost in a crash. Article #9 was under repair, but repairs were stopped and the airplane placed in Class 26, non-operational status. Air Service Command operated 12 YC-76s on a service test basis for nine months and found that they required excessive man hours to maintain. It was suggested that these be placed into Class 26 or Survey.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
The final disposition of the aircraft as of 1 October 1945, by letter of the Air Technical Service Command; 1-Washout upon delivery from factory, 5-Class 26, 10-Survey, 1-Condemned, 8-Reconstruction Finance Corp. to be sold as surplus.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". In the interim, the Curtiss-Wright plants at Buffalo, New York and Louisville, Kentucky went over to full production of the Curtiss C-46 Commando.[2][14][15] USAAF Materiel Command later estimated the entire C-76 project cost the U.S. government $400 million dollars and several months in lost production time.[5]
Variants
- YC-76
- Prototypes, 11 built.[16]
- C-76
- Production aircraft built at St Louis, five built.[16]
- YC-76A
- Production variant, nine built.[16]
- C-76A
- Production variant, order for 175 cancelled, none built.[16]
Specification
See also
Script error: No such module "Portal". Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era
- Hughes H-4 Hercules (another all-wood transport aircraft developed in WW2, the "Spruce Goose")
- De Havilland Mosquito (British all wood WW2 aircraft nicknamed the "Wooden Wonder")
Related lists
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ a b Dreher, Carl, Wood Is A War Weapon, Popular Science, Vol. 141 No.3 (September 1942), pp. 48–74
- ↑ a b c d e f g h Kleber, John E., The Encyclopedia of Louisville, University Press of Kentucky (2001) Template:ISBN, Template:ISBN, pp. xxvii, 235–236
- ↑ a b c d e Dorrell, David (ed.), Curtiss Caravan, Air Pictorial: Journal of the Air League, Air League of the British Empire, Volume 35, No. 7 (July 1973), p. 69
- ↑ Forest Products Journal, 1 January 2007: "G.A. Page, chief engineer of the Curtiss-Wright Division at St. Louis, Mo., wrote, "It [the Design Handbook] has expedited and facilitated our work in connection with the design of the C-76 airplane to a degree that is hard to estimate." Forest Products Laboratory: supporting the nation's armed forces with valuable wood research for 90 years
- ↑ a b c d e Sessums, Col. J.W., Design and Engineering Problems of Aircraft Production {Restricted}, 14 May 1946, pp. 6–8 National Defense University Archives Template:Webarchive
- ↑ "Army In Long Pants" Popular Mechanics, July 1944 – bottom of page 21 photo showing front nose opened for loading
- ↑ a b Burck, Gilbert, Mr. Higgins and His Wonderful Boats, Life Magazine, 16 August 1943, p. 112
- ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ a b c d e Mansfield, Howard, Skylark: The Life, Lies, and Inventions of Harry Atwood, UPNE (1999) Template:ISBN, Template:ISBN, pp. 204–205
- ↑ Curtiss-Wright Corporate Records, Static Tests of Curtiss-Wright C-76 Wings, ENG-51-C359-10, 7/24/43
- ↑ a b Boyne, Walt, "C-46 [sic]: 'The Basketcase Bummer' " Airpower, Granada Hills, California, May 1974, Volume 4, Number 3, page 64.
- ↑ Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. VII
- ↑ News Article, New York Times, 4 August 1943, 17 October 1943
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- ↑ News Article, New York Times, 11 August 1944
- ↑ a b c d Andrade 1979, p. 80
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Bibliography
<templatestyles src="Refbegin/styles.css" />
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
- Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
External links
Script error: No such module "Navbox". Script error: No such module "Navbox".