Continuous mapping theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Distinguish". In probability theory, the continuous mapping theorem states that continuous functions preserve limits even if their arguments are sequences of random variables. A continuous function, in Heine's definition, is such a function that maps convergent sequences into convergent sequences: if xn → x then g(xn) → g(x). The continuous mapping theorem states that this will also be true if we replace the deterministic sequence {xn} with a sequence of random variables {Xn}, and replace the standard notion of convergence of real numbers “→” with one of the types of convergence of random variables.

This theorem was first proved by Henry Mann and Abraham Wald in 1943,[1] and it is therefore sometimes called the Mann–Wald theorem.[2] Meanwhile, Denis Sargan refers to it as the general transformation theorem.[3]

Statement

Let {Xn}, X be random elements defined on a metric space S. Suppose a function g: S→S′ (where S′ is another metric space) has the set of discontinuity points Dg such that Pr[X ∈ Dg] = 0. Then[4][5]

Xn →d X⇒g(Xn) →d g(X);Xn →p X⇒g(Xn) →p g(X);Xn →a.s. X⇒g(Xn) →a.s. g(X).

where the superscripts, "d", "p", and "a.s." denote convergence in distribution, convergence in probability, and almost sure convergence respectively.

Proof

This proof has been adopted from Script error: No such module "Footnotes".

Spaces S and S′ are equipped with certain metrics. For simplicity we will denote both of these metrics using the |x − y| notation, even though the metrics may be arbitrary and not necessarily Euclidean.

Convergence in distribution

We will need a particular statement from the portmanteau theorem: that convergence in distribution Xn→dX is equivalent to

𝔼f(Xn)→𝔼f(X) for every bounded continuous functional f.

So it suffices to prove that 𝔼f(g(Xn))→𝔼f(g(X)) for every bounded continuous functional f. For simplicity we assume g continuous. Note that F=f∘g is itself a bounded continuous functional. And so the claim follows from the statement above. The general case is slightly more technical.

Convergence in probability

Fix an arbitrary ε > 0. Then for any δ > 0 consider the set Bδ defined as

Bδ={x∈S∣x∉Dg: ∃y∈S: |x−y|<δ,|g(x)−g(y)|>ε}.

This is the set of continuity points x of the function g(·) for which it is possible to find, within the δ-neighborhood of x, a point which maps outside the ε-neighborhood of g(x). By definition of continuity, this set shrinks as δ goes to zero, so that limδ → 0Bδ = ∅.

Now suppose that |g(X) − g(Xn)| > ε. This implies that at least one of the following is true: either |X−Xn| ≥ δ, or X ∈ Dg, or X∈Bδ. In terms of probabilities this can be written as

Pr⁡(|g(Xn)−g(X)|>ε)≤Pr⁡(|Xn−X|≥δ)+Pr⁡(X∈Bδ)+Pr⁡(X∈Dg).

On the right-hand side, the first term converges to zero as n → ∞ for any fixed δ, by the definition of convergence in probability of the sequence {Xn}. The second term converges to zero as δ → 0, since the set Bδ shrinks to an empty set. And the last term is identically equal to zero by assumption of the theorem. Therefore, the conclusion is that

limn→∞Pr⁡(|g(Xn)−g(X)|>ε)=0,

which means that g(Xn) converges to g(X) in probability.

Almost sure convergence

By definition of the continuity of the function g(·),

limn→∞Xn(ω)=X(ω)⇒limn→∞g(Xn(ω))=g(X(ω))

at each point X(ω) where g(·) is continuous. Therefore,

Pr⁡(limn→∞g(Xn)=g(X))≥Pr⁡(limn→∞g(Xn)=g(X), X∉Dg)≥Pr⁡(limn→∞Xn=X, X∉Dg)=1,

because the intersection of two almost sure events is almost sure.

By definition, we conclude that g(Xn) converges to g(X) almost surely.

See also

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".