Catullus 3

File:Antonio Zucchi (1726-1796) - Catullus Comforting Lesbia over the Death of Her Pet Sparrow and Writing an Ode - 960062.1 - National Trust.jpg

Catullus Comforting Lesbia over the Death of Her Pet Sparrow and Writing an Ode, by Antonio Zucchi, c. Template:Trim

File:Catullus 3.webm

Catullus 3

Catullus 3 is a poem by Roman poet Gaius Valerius Catullus (c. Template:Trim–c. Template:Trim BCE) that laments the death of a pet sparrow (passer) for which an unnamed girl (puella), possibly Catullus' lover Lesbia, had an affection. Written in hendecasyllabic meter,Template:Sfn it is considered to be one of the most famous of Latin poems.Template:Sfn

This poem, together with Catullus' other poems, survived from antiquity in a single manuscript discovered c. Template:Trim in Verona, from which three copies survive. Fourteen centuries of copying from copies left scholars in doubt as to the poem's original wording in a few places, although centuries of scholarship have led to a consensus critical version. Research on Catullus was the first application of the genealogical method of textual criticism.

In the original manuscript, Catullus 3 and Catullus 2 were parts of the same text, but the two poems were separated by scholars in the 16th century.

Analysis

Ingleheart finds epigrammatic features in the poem, including a connection with Greek epigrams:Template:Sfn the poem, starting with the first word, reads like an epitaph.Template:Sfn Tradition of epigrams to dead pets was well established at the time (Thomas points to a potential borrowing from Meleager).Template:Sfn The Hellenistic epigrams about dead pets are somewhat parodic, exploiting the disconnect between the ultimately serious topic of death and an insignificance of an animal.Template:Sfn Catullus utilizes this effect to focus the attention of the reader on the girl, not the sparrow,Template:Sfn producing a celebration of mea puella and essentially turning the girl's loss into his own gain with certain amount of mockery.Template:Sfn

In the beginning of the poem, the poet "controls the proceedings", directing Venuses and Amores, and later all men of refine (venustiores) to mourn, following the script of Roman funerals, where a family member or a professional mourner (praefica) would ask the crowd to remember the loss.Template:Sfn The fact that all the commotion is about a dead bird is quickly revealed; the standard eulogy would have proceeded along the standard Roman lines: genealogy (skipped in the poem, as pets – and slaves, that also could have been characterized as deliciae – were considered to be creations of their masters), deeds (also none), and character. The latter includes good disposition and loyalty, wording typical for epitaphs.Template:Sfn At the end poet refers to the Hades and addresses the deceased in the second person, as was traditional for Roman laudatio funebris.Template:Sfn

The traditional reading of the poem (and Catullus 2) is thus straightforward: the poet borrows from the literary tradition of using either a real (or a fictional) connection between a lover and her pet, so he can inject himself into the story as an observer and describe his own relationship with Lesbia.Template:Sfn Pomeroy suggests that the poem also reflects on the power relationships in the Roman society, in particular, between a child slave (deliciae, symbolized by the bird) and their master.Template:Sfn

Template:Langx

File:NAMA Phallus ailé.jpg

Winged phallus (460-425 B.C.)

Following the printing of Catullus' works in 1472, Poems 2 and 3 gained new influence and ignited the dispute on the meaning of the passer, with some scholars suggesting that the word did not mean a sparrow, but was a phallic symbol, particularly if sinu in line 2 of Catullus 2 is translated as "lap" rather than "bosom".Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Other scholars, however, have rejected this suggestion.Template:Sfn Pomeroy suggestsTemplate:Sfn that the clearest arguments "for" belong to GiangrandeTemplate:Sfn and "against" – to Jocelyn,Template:Sfn Thomas mentionsTemplate:Sfn also opposition from Adams, while Vergados and O'Bryhim highlightTemplate:Sfn a collection of papers in a book by Gaisser.Template:Sfn This reading of Catullus 3 suggests a description of the end of an amorous affair, while Catullus 2 provides the details of the sexual activities.Template:Sfn In Hooper's interpretation, Catullus 3 is a lament about a temporary impotence.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

The idea that the word passer in Catullus 2 and 3 is a euphemism for penis apparently dates back to Classical antiquity (cf. Martial with his "I shall give you the sparrow of Catullus"); scholars kept arguing about this interpretation literally for hundreds of years, since the mid-16th century, when Muretus disagreed with the Politian's 15th century view of passer as a code for obscenity.Template:Sfn The dispute even embroiled the Latin dictionaries, with mentions of peculiarly lascivious behavior of passer birds dropped by the Harpers' Latin Dictionary at the end of the 19th century.Template:Sfn Elerick credits the longevity of the dispute to Catullus' reputation as a master of double-entendre,Template:Sfn and comes up with a translation that keeps the euphemistic interpretation.Template:Sfn

Ingleheart states that the sexual interpretation of passer is "certainly not impossible" (suggesting an English equivalent, "pecker"), and points, in addition to the position taken by Martial, to similar reading of the Meleager's epigram on a death of a hare and Catullus 2 imitation of Meleager.Template:Sfn

Hooper states that not only the sparrows were associated with general salaciousness by Pliny the Elder (in his Natural history) and Sextus Pompeius Festus, while in Egyptian hieroglyphics an image of the bird denoted "little, evil", but the bird in lines 8–10 of the poem (and in the beginning of Catullus 2) behaves in a very un-sparrow-like way.Template:Sfn Festus, in particular, points to mimes that "call the lewd phallus strutheum, evidently from the salaciousness of the sparrow, which in Greek is called strouthos".Template:Sfn Thomas stresses that it is unlikely that Catullus was unaware of the metaphorical meaning of a sparrow and points out to the Meleager's poem about a dead hare, where the girl suggestively says, "'Do you see ... that I've stirred up the hare for others."Template:Sfn

Vergados and O'Bryhim mark the large erotic vocabulary in Catullus 2 and 3Template:Sfn and suggest a "middle" way: the sparrow is indeed the bird, but it was used by its mistress for sexual acts.Template:Sfn Genovese offers interpretations of a passer as a love charm or a symbol of a love rival,Template:Sfn Thomas disagrees, but finds these ideas "plausible".Template:Sfn

Green analyses the natural behavior of a sparrow and the attitude of Romans towards this bird and suggests that the poem eulogizes either a common house sparrow (Passer domesticus) or the Italian sparrow (Passer italiae).Template:Sfn

Influence on later poetry

File:Catullus 3 in Latin English Lugete, O Veneres Cupidinesque.webm

Catullus 3 in Latin and English

This poem along with the preceding Catullus 2 inspired a genre of poems about lovers' pets. One classical example include Ovid's elegy on the death of his mistress Corinna's parrot (Amores 2.6.). Another is Martial's epigram (Book I number CIX) on a lap dog, which refers to Catullus 2 specifically ("Issa est passere nequior Catulli", "Issa [the dog] is naughtier than Catullus's sparrow"). Hooper, naturally, sees in the latter (although not necessarily in Ovid's writing) a confirmation of the sexual symbolism of the sparrow.Template:Sfn

Birds were common love-gifts in the Classical world, and several scholars have speculated that the narrator gave it to the woman; this might explain the poet's identification with the sparrow and his fond lament for the bird in Catullus 3.

Manuscript tradition

A key question concerns the unity of poems 2 and 3. In the copies derived from the original V manuscript, poems 2 (lines 1–10), 2b (lines 11–13), and 3 appear as one poem under the title "Fletus passeris Lesbie" (Lament for Lesbia's Sparrow). Shortly before 1500, Catullus 3 was separated from Catullus 2/2b by Marcantonio Sabellico, which has been supported by scholars ever since.