Biology of romantic love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates

Script error: No such module "Sidebar".

The biology of romantic love has been explored by such biological sciences as evolutionary psychology, evolutionary biology, anthropology and neuroscience. Neurochemicals and hormones such as dopamine and oxytocin are studied along with a variety of interrelated brain systems which produce the psychological experience and behaviors of romantic love.

The study of romantic love is still in its infancy.[1] As of 2021, there were a total of 42 biological studies on romantic love.[2]

Definition of romantic love

The meaning of the term "romantic love" has changed considerably throughout history, making it difficult to simply define.[3] Initially it was coined to refer to certain attitudes and behaviors described in a body of literature now referred to as courtly love.[4] However, academic psychology and especially biology also consider romantic love in a different sense, which refers to a brain system (or systems) related to pair bonding or mating with associated psychological properties.[5][6][7][8]

Bode and Kushnick undertook a comprehensive review of romantic love from a biological perspective in 2021. They considered the psychology of romantic love, its mechanisms, development across the lifespan, functions, and evolutionary history. Based on the content of that review, they proposed a biological definition of romantic love:[6]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Romantic love is a motivational state typically associated with a desire for long-term mating with a particular individual. It occurs across the lifespan and is associated with distinctive cognitive, emotional, behavioral, social, genetic, neural, and endocrine activity in both sexes. Throughout much of the life course, it serves mate choice, courtship, sex, and pair-bonding functions. It is a suite of adaptations and by-products that arose sometime during the recent evolutionary history of humans.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Romantic love in this sense is also not necessarily "dyadic", "social" or "interpersonal", despite being related to pair bonding. Romantic love can be experienced outside the context of a relationship, for example in the case of unrequited love where the feelings are not reciprocated.[9][10] A person can develop romantic love feelings before any relationship has occurred, for only a potential partner.[9][10][11][7] The potential partner can even be somebody they do not know well or aren't acquainted with at all, as in cases of love at first sight and parasocial attachments.[9][12][13]

The early stage of romantic love (which has obsessive and addictive features) is also commonly referred to as passionate love, infatuation, limerence, being "in love" or obsessive love.[11][14][15][6][16] Research has never settled on a unified terminology or set of methods.[6][2] Distinctions are drawn between this early stage of romantic love and the "attachment system" theorized by the attachment theorists like John Bowlby.[17][8][18] In the past, attachment theorists have argued that attachment theory and attachment styles can replace other theories of love, but academics on love have argued this is incorrect and that romantic love and attachment are not identical concepts.[19][18][17] The early stage of romantic love is thought to involve additional brain systems for other purposes, with distinct evolutionary histories.[17][11][8] Romantic love is also distinct from sexual attraction, although they most often occur together.[11][8][20]

Variation exists in the way romantic love is expressed in the population. A cross-cultural study of currently in-love people found four clusters, with varying degrees of intensity, obsessive thinking, commitment, frequency of sex and other differences.[21] Other studies indicate romantic love can be experienced both with or without obsessional features.[16][22] Typically, intense romantic love is limited to a duration of 12-18 months or as long as 3 years, depending on the estimate;[6][14] however, in a rare phenomenon called "long-term intense romantic love", some people experience intense attraction inside a relationship, even for 10 years or more. This is similar to early-stage intense romantic love, but at this later stage they exhibit less of the obsessional features.[16][22]

Independent emotion systems

File:Chemical basis of love.svg
Simplified overview of the neurochemical and hormonal basis of love.

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Helen Fisher and her colleagues proposed that the brain systems involved with mammalian reproduction can be separated into at least three parts:[17][11]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Neuroscientists currently believe that the basic emotions arise from distinct circuits (or systems) of neural activity; that humans share several of these primary emotion-motivation circuits with other mammals; and that these brain systems evolved to direct behavior [...]. It is hypothesized that among these primary neural systems are at least three discrete, interrelated emotion-motivation systems in the mammalian brain for mating, reproduction, and parenting: lust, attraction, and attachment [...].

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

In Fisher's theory, the systems tend to act in unison, but may become disassociated and act independently. For example, a person in a long-term partnership may feel deep attachment for their spouse, while experiencing intense romantic love (attraction) for some other individual, while being sexually attracted (lust) to still others, all at the same time.[23][11] Lisa Diamond has also used independent emotions theory to explain why people can 'fall in love' sometimes without sexual desire, as in the case of "platonic" infatuation for a friend.[20][24]

Fisher associates each system with different neurotransmitters and/or hormones (lust: estrogen & androgens; attraction: dopamine, norepinephrine & serotonin; attachment: oxytocin & vasopressin), but modern research shows these associations are not as clearly defined as Fisher's theory proposes.[11][8][6][25] Additionally, romantic love has been associated with endogenous opioids, cortisol and nerve growth factor which are not included in Fisher's earlier theories.[8][26][27] Fisher's model is considered outdated, although the idea of interrelated systems is useful.[8]

Evolution of systems

Courtship attraction theory

<templatestyles src="Unsolved/styles.css" />

Unsolved problem in biology
When did human pair bonding evolve? Is pair bonding an antecedent to romantic love, or have there been other steps in the evolution of pair bonds in humans (e.g. a seasonal bond)?[8]
More unsolved problems in biology

Helen Fisher's theory is that romantic love (which she considers distinct from attachment) is a motivation system for choosing and focusing energy on a preferred mating partner. According to Fisher, this brain system evolved for mammalian mate choice, also called "courtship attraction". In this phenomenon, a preferred mating partner is chosen based on a display of physical traits (such as a peacock's tail feathers) or other behaviors.[17][11][7] Fisher also includes the attraction to personality traits and other characteristics in her mate choice theory for humans.[28][29][30] Courtship attraction shares similar behaviors with romantic love in humans, and both involve activation of dopaminergic reward circuits. In most species, courtship attraction is as brief as lasting only minutes, hours, days or weeks, but intense romantic love can last much longer in humans.[7]

A critique of Fisher's theory published by Adam Bode holds that courtship attraction only encompasses love at first sight attraction or a crush, and the core components of romantic love (including the intense attraction and obsessive thoughts, in addition to attachment) evolved as a co-option of mother-infant bonding.[8] A study on love at first sight found that even though people reporting the experience retrospectively will recall features resembling passionate love ("constant thoughts about the person and the desire to be with him or her"), people reporting love at first sight currently after just meeting the potential partner only report neutral scores (neither agreeing nor disagreeing) on a romantic love measure including a passion component. Some authors have speculated that the remembered account of falling in love at first sight (with high passion) is often actually a memory confabulation. Furthermore, the study found that the experience of love at first sight was related to the physical attractiveness of the potential partner. This led the researchers to conclude that love at first sight is actually a strong initial attraction, rather than resembling the state of being in love.[13] Bode argues this more closely resembles the concept of courtship attraction, and can be considered a separate system from core romantic love components. Courtship attraction may be characterized by dopamine, oxytocin and opioid activity, but little is known about it because existing studies were not designed to target it.[8]

Co-option theory

Co-option is an evolutionary process whereby a given trait is repurposed to take on a new function.[31][8][6] One example is how a number of species of fish (e.g. catfish) have co-opted their gas bladder to produce sound. Co-opted traits can be morphological, but also behavioral. Co-option has been used as an explanation of how a species can develop an evolutionary adaptation very quickly sometimes, seemingly faster than Darwinism could explain. With this process, a seemingly "new" trait can develop quickly because its structure predated the time of adaptation, only needing to be modified to function in a new way. In some cases, co-option involves one gene whose function is altered, while in other cases the co-opted gene is a duplicate and the function of the original gene is retained.[31] The terms "co-option" and "exaptation" are closely related, but have different connotations. Exaptation refers to structural continuity when a trait takes on a new function.[31][8]

Adam Bode has proposed that romantic love is "a suite of adaptations and by-products" consisting of a number of interrelated systems, several of which evolved by co-opting mother-infant bonding (attraction for bonding, obsessive thinking and attachment). The co-option theory says that the genes that regulate mother-infant bonding were recreated and took on a new function. Courtship attraction and sexual desire are "causally linked adjuncts" which were not co-opted, but were combined and modified in romantic love. The theory is based on the available human evidence, but also a literature arising from research on prairie voles that pair bonding uses the same mechanisms that mother-infant bonding uses.[8][6]

Academic literature has drawn a parallel between romantic love and the mother-infant dyad since the 1980s, with attachment theorists like Cindy Hazan and Phillip Shaver believing the two share a common biological process.[32] In 1998, James Leckman & Linda Mayes compared features of romantic love and early parental love, finding substantial similarities. Both are altered mental states featuring preoccupations, exclusivity of focus, a longing for reciprocity and idealization of the other. The trajectories of both also share similarities, with preoccupation increasing during courtship (for romantic love) and around the time of birth (for parental love), then diminishing after a relationship is established (for romantic love) or shortly after the postpartum period (for parental love).[33][8][6] (The use of "baby talk" by romantic lovers is another "uncanny" similarity.)[8] In 2004, Andreas Bartels and Semir Zeki were the first to compare romantic love and maternal love with fMRI. This comparison looked at areas known to contain high densities of receptors for the attachment hormones oxytocin and vasopressin. Bartels & Zeki found precise overlap in some specific areas including the striatum (putamen, globus pallidus and caudate nucleus) and some overlap in the ventral tegmental area, areas with dopamine and oxytocin receptors. Each type of love was also associated with other unique activations. Notably, maternal love involved the periaqueductal gray matter, an area associated with endogenous pain suppression during intense emotional experiences such as childbirth.[34][35][8] Two meta-analyses of fMRI experiments have also found similarities between maternal love and romantic love.[36][35][8] A 2022 meta-analysis by Shih et al. found that both types of love were associated with the left ventral tegmental area (more associated with the pleasurable aspect of reward, or "liking"), while in addition romantic love also involved the right ventral tegmental area (more associated with reward "wanting").[35]

In 2003, Lisa Diamond suggested that adult pair bonding is an exaptation of the affectional bond between infants and caregivers, using this to explain instances of "platonic" infatuations, or i.e. "romantic" passion without sexual desire.[37][20] Some instances of this are reported by Dorothy Tennov in her study of "limerence" (i.e. love madness, commonly for an unreachable person), in which a younger woman who otherwise considered herself heterosexual would have this type of reaction towards an older woman.[37][38][39][40] Among other examples are schoolgirls falling "violently in love with each other, and suffering all the pangs of unrequited attachment, desperate jealousy etc." (historically called a "smash"), and Native American men who seemed to fall in love with each other and form intense, but non-sexual bonds. Helen Fisher's theory that sexual desire is a separate system from romantic love and attachment is also given as theoretical evidence. Diamond argues that romantic love without sexual desire can even happen in contradiction to one's sexual orientation: because it would not have been adaptive for a parent to only be able to bond with an opposite sex child, so the systems must have evolved independently from sexual orientation. People most often fall in love because of sexual desire, but Diamond suggests time spent together and physical touch can serve as a substitute. Diamond believes the connection between romantic love and sexual desire is "bidirectional" in that either one can cause the other to occur because of shared oxytocin pathways in the brain.[20]

Updated model

Based on contentions over evolutionary theories and Fisher's outdated neurochemical model, Bode has suggested Fisher's model, while useful and the predominant one for a time, is oversimplified and proposes five systems:[8]

  • Sexual desire is associated with a drive to initiate and be receptive to sexual activity. Testosterone, dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, histamine and opioids have been implicated in sexual behavior.
  • Courtship attraction is for choosing and focusing energy on a preferred mating partner and promotes courtship behaviors. It can take the form of e.g. love at first sight attraction or a crush and also be intertwined with other forms of attraction, but might not precede a relationship in all cases. Courtship attraction may be associated with dopamine, oxytocin and opioids.
  • Bonding attraction is the type of attraction for pair bond formation, characterized by a strong desire for proximity, separation anxiety when apart, exclusivity of focus and heightened awareness of the loved one. Bonding attraction is associated with dopamine and oxytocin activity, especially in the ventral tegmental area. According to Bode's arguments, this is the type of romantic attraction shown in fMRI experiments of early-stage romantic love.
  • Obsessive thinking involves preoccupation or intrusive thinking about the loved one. Some authors have drawn a comparison between this feature and obsessive-compulsive disorder, suggesting they share similar neurobiology, but the evidence for that is limited and ambiguous.
  • Attachment is for pair bond maintenance, or maintaining very close personal relationships, with psychological features like a heightened sense of responsibility, longing for reciprocity and a powerful sense of empathy. Attachment is associated with oxytocin, dopamine and opioid activity, but there is also some evidence for the involvement of vasopressin.[8]

Bode suggests that the systems of bonding attraction, obsessive thinking and attachment (the three systems which were co-opted from mother-infant bonding) together form the core of romantic love (the necessary components). However, all five systems are merged into one single phenomenon of romantic love, with a variety of different outcomes depending on the circumstances.[8]

Evolutionary psychology

Evolutionary psychology has proposed several explanations for love. The pattern of behaviors associated today with love are prevalent throughout the animal kingdoms and beyond.[41]

Monkey infants and children are for a very long time dependent on parental help. Love has therefore been seen as a mechanism to promote mutual parental support of children for an extended time period. Another is that sexually transmitted diseases may cause, among other effects, permanently reduced fertility, injury to the fetus, and increase risks during childbirth. This would favor exclusive long-term relationships reducing the risk of contracting an STD.[42]

From the perspective of evolutionary psychology the experiences and behaviors associated with love can be investigated in terms of how they have been shaped by human evolution.[43] For example, it has been suggested that human language has been selected during evolution as a type of "mating signal" that allows potential mates to judge reproductive fitness.[44] Since Darwin's time there have been similar speculations about the evolution of human interest in music also as a potential signaling system for attracting and judging the fitness of potential mates.[45] It has been suggested that the human capacity to experience love has been evolved as a signal to potential mates that the partner will be a good parent and be likely to help pass genes to future generations.[46] Biologist Jeremy Griffith defines love as 'unconditional selflessness',[47] suggesting utterly cooperative instincts developed in modern humans' ancestor, Australopithecus. Studies of bonobos (a great ape previously referred to as a pygmy chimpanzee) are frequently cited in support of a cooperative past in humans.[48]

Mechanics

Addiction

The early stage of romantic love is being compared to a behavioral addiction (i.e. addiction to a non-substance) but the "substance" involved is the loved person.[49][50][14][15] Addiction involves a phenomenon known as incentive salience, also called "wanting" (in quotes).[51][52] This is the property by which cues in the environment stand out to a person and become attention-grabbing and attractive, like a "motivational magnet" which pulls a person towards a particular reward.[53][52] In the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction, repeated drug use renders the brain hypersensitive to drugs and drug cues, resulting in pathological levels of "wanting" to use drugs.[15][52] People in love are also thought to experience incentive salience in response to their beloved. Lovers share other similarities with addicts as well, like tolerance, dependence, withdrawal, relapse, craving and mood modification.[14]

Incentive salience is mediated by dopamine projections in the mesocorticolimbic pathway of the brain, an area generally involved with reward, motivation and reinforcement learning.[51][52][54][22] Dopamine signaling for incentive salience originates in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and projects to areas such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in the ventral striatum.[55][52] The VTA is one of two main areas of the brain with neurons which produce dopamine (the other being the substantia nigra pars compacta). Projections from the VTA innervate the NAc, where dopamine activity attaches motivational significance to stimuli associated with rewards.[56] Brain scans of people in love using fMRI (commonly while looking at a photograph of their beloved) show activations in these areas like the VTA and NAc.[14][15][35] Another dopamine-rich area of the reward system shown to be active in romantic love is the caudate nucleus, containing 80% of the brain's dopamine receptor sites.[14][22][57][58] The caudate nucleus has shown activity in response to a monetary reward and cocaine.[57][59][34] This activity in reward and motivation areas suggests that early-stage intense romantic love is a motivation system or goal-oriented state (rather than a specific emotion), consistent with the description of romantic love as a desire or longing for union with another person.[57][15][22] These activations are also consistent with the similarity between romantic love and addiction.[14][15]

In addiction research, a distinction is drawn between "wanting" a reward (i.e. incentive salience, tied to mesocorticolimbic dopamine) and "liking" a reward (i.e. pleasure, tied to hedonic hotspots), aspects which are dissociable.[53][52] People can be addicted to drugs and compulsively seek them out, even when taking the drug no longer results in a high or the addiction is detrimental to one's life.[14] They can also "want" (i.e. feel compelled towards, in the sense of incentive salience) something which they do not cognitively wish for.[53] In a similar way, people who are in love may "want" a loved person even when interactions with them are not pleasurable. For example, they may want to contact an ex-partner after a rejection, even when the experience will only be painful.[14] It is also possible for a person to be "in love" with somebody they do not like, or who treats them poorly.[60] Helen Fisher has proposed that romantic love is a "positive addiction" (i.e. not harmful) when requited and a "negative addiction" when unrequited or inappropriate.[14]

Research has not investigated whether romantic love shares all of the neurobiological aspects of addiction.[6][61] Despite similarities, there are also differences between romantic love and addiction. One of the major differences is that the trajectories diverge, with the addictive aspects tending to disappear over time during a relationship in romantic love. By comparison, in a drug addiction, the detrimental aspects magnify over time with repeated drug use, turning into compulsions, a loss of control and a negative emotional state.[15][51] Academics do not universally agree on whether or not love is always an addiction or when it needs to be treated.[61] The term "love addiction" has had an amorphous definition over the years and does not yet denote a psychiatric condition, but recently one definition has been developed that "Individuals addicted to love tend to experience negative moods and affects when away from their partners and have the strong urge and craving to see their partner as a way of coping with stressful situations."[62] Other authors include rejected lovers as love addicts,[63] or specify that love is an addiction when it involves abnormal processes which carry negative consequences. A broader view is that all love is addiction, or simply an appetite, similar to how humans are dependent on food.[61]

In brain scans of long-term intense romantic love (involving subjects who professed to be "madly" in love, but were together with their partner 10 years or more), attraction similar to early-stage romantic love was associated with dopamine reward center activity ("wanting"), but long-term attachment was associated with the globus palludus, a site for opiate receptors identified as a hedonic hotspot ("liking"). Long-term romantic lovers also showed lower levels of obsession compared to those in the early stage.[22][16]

OCD theory

Since the late 1990s, the obsessional features of early-stage romantic love have been compared to obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD).[17][33][64] This is also sometimes paired with a theory that obsessive (or intrusive) thinking is related to serotonin levels being lowered while in love, although study results have been inconsistent.[17][65][66] Another theory relates obsessive thinking to addiction, because drug users exhibit obsessive thoughts about drug use, as well as compulsions.[15][49][51]

In 1999, James Leckman and Linda Mayes published a theoretical comparison between early-stage romantic love, early parental love and OCD. This paper was intended as an investigation into the origin of OCD, but it also relates to the evolutionary theory of romantic love.[33][8] Both early-stage romantic love and OCD share features of preoccupation, intrusive thoughts, a heightened sense of responsibility, a need for things to be "just right" and some proximity-seeking behaviors. In some cases, obsessions experienced by OCD patients relate to what harms might happen to a family member, which resembles some behavioral patterns involved with romantic and parental love. The authors also speculate that psychasthenia (feelings of incompleteness, insufficiency or imperfection) resembles the "longing for reciprocity" and idealization which are features of romantic love.[33]

A 1999 experiment led by Donatella Marazziti found that people in love had platelet serotonin transporter density which was lower than controls, and similar to the density of a group of unmedicated OCD patients. Six of the 20 in-love participants were also retested after a period of 12 to 18 months, and serotonin transporter density had returned to normal.[65] However, a similar experiment in 2012 led by Sandra Langeslag found a different result, with men and women being affected differently. Men had lower blood serotonin levels than controls, but women had higher serotonin levels. In women, obsessive thinking was also actually associated with increased serotonin.[67] A 2025 study led by Adam Bode also found no association between SSRI use and obsessive thinking about a loved one, or the intensity of romantic love. Therefore, although these earlier experiments do suggest romantic love and serotonin are probably associated, the authors suggest that the idea of obsessive thinking being attributed to lowered serotonin levels seems inaccurate.[66]

Stress

In the early stages of romantic love, individuals may start out hypervigilant (hyperaware and sensitive to a partner's cues) due to uncertainty and novelty, but become synchronized over time as a relationship progresses. Bonding is thought to be in part facilitated by coordinated behaviors which display reciprocity and events which evoke beneficial stress (eustress), like a passionate kiss. The stress response system involves two major systems: the autonomic nervous system and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis.[68] Some experiments have been done which support the idea that the stress response is involved during the early stage of romantic love, measuring cortisol levels; however, these experiments have been inconsistent with respect to cortisol being higher or lower.[69][68][6]

Brain imaging

Brain imaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been used to investigate which brain regions are involved in romantic love. Nearly all of these experiments have had participants look at a photograph of their beloved during an fMRI scan, with a few exceptions, although the specific procedures used have not always been identical. The differences in experimental design (e.g. length of time the participants had been in love, or the specific task given to participants during the scan) can be used to explain why the experiment results are sometimes different.[70][71][72][35][73]

In 2000, a study by Andreas Bartels and Semir Zeki of University College London was the first fMRI study of romantic love. The 17 participants were "truly, deeply and madly in love", had been together for a mean of 2.4 years, and were shown either one or two photographs of their loved one during the scan. Two main areas were active in this study, the middle insular cortex, associated with "gut feelings", and part of the anterior cingulate cortex, associated with feelings of euphoria. Other activations were areas in the cerebrum, the caudate nucleus, putamen and the cerebellum.[59][74] A later analysis in 2004 by the same authors also reports activity in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), which produces dopamine.[34][70]

In 2005, a study by Arthur Aron, Helen Fisher, Debra Mashek, Greg Strong, Haifang Li and Lucy Brown was the first fMRI study of early-stage intense romantic love.[70][75] This study differed from Bartels & Zeki in that the 17 participants who had "just fallen madly in love" had been in love for a much shorter mean time of only 7.4 months. These participants were more intensely in love, and spent 85% or more of their waking hours thinking of their loved one.[70][11][14] This study also had participants look at a photograph of their loved one during the scan. Reward and motivation areas were active, like the VTA and areas of the caudate. Activity was also found in the insular and cingulate cortex, involved with emotion. Some interesting areas were correlated with the length of the relationship, like the ventral pallidum, implicated in attachment in prairie voles, and the anterior cingulate, implicated in obsessive thinking, cognition and emotion. This study also examined correlations with facial attractiveness to determine that the right VTA was active because of romantic passion rather than because the partner was aesthetically pleasing. Aesthetically pleasing faces elicited more activity in the left VTA, which is more associated with "liking" a reward (i.e. pleasure), whereas the right VTA is more associated with "wanting" a reward (i.e. incentive salience).[70][14] In 2011, Xu et al. repeated the experiment by Aron et al., but using Chinese participants.[76]

Ortigue et al. found that an unconscious prime of the name of a romantic partner activated similar brain regions as when subjects were consciously aware of seeing partners' faces.[77] Subliminal priming with either a beloved's name or a favorite hobby activated emotion and motivational brain regions: caudate nucleus, insula, bilateral fusiform regions, parahippocampal gyrus, right angular gyrus, occipital cortex, and cerebellum. However, the love prime evoked more activation in bilateral angular gyri and bilateral fusiform regions than the hobby prime. These regions are associated with integrating abstract representations, and the angular gyrus in particular is involved with abstract representations of the self. The authors also found a correlation (r=0.496, p=0.002) between activation of a region of the angular gyrus with a passionate-love scale measuring subjective feelings of love.[77]

Some brain scan experiments of early-stage romantic love have found activation of the posterior cingulate cortex, which is implicated in autobiographical memory of socially relevant stimuli (e.g. partner names) and attention.[72] Most experiments (including long-term romantic love) have shown activity in the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus, areas involved with learning and memory.[72][22]

Brain imaging studies of romantic love
Authors Year Type Description Time in love Stimuli
Bartels & Zeki[59] 2000 fMRI Passionate love in relationships 2.4 years (mean) Pictures
Najib et al.[78] 2004 fMRI Grief after rejection Within 6 weeks after separation, after relationship at least 6 months Rumination
Aron et al.[70] 2005 fMRI Early-stage intense passionate love in relationships 7.4 months (mean) Pictures
Ortigue et al.[77] 2007 fMRI Passionate love in relationships 15.3 months (mean) Names
Kim et al.[79] 2009 fMRI Passionate love in relationships, retested 180 days later Not more than 100 days Pictures
Fisher et al.[71] 2010 fMRI Intense passionate love after rejection 63 days after rejection, after 21 month relationship (averages) Pictures
Younger et al.[26] 2010 fMRI Early-stage intense passionate love in relationships, with pain reduction measure <9 months in relationship Pictures
Zeki & Romaya[80] 2010 fMRI Passionate love in heterosexual and homosexual relationships 3.7 years (mean) Pictures
Stoessel et al.[81] 2011 fMRI Passionate love in happy relationships, and unhappy after separation Maximum 6 months Pictures
Xu et al.[76] 2011 fMRI Early-stage intense passionate love in relationships (Chinese) 6.54 months (mean) Pictures
Xu et al.[82] 2012 fMRI Intense passionate love in relationships (Chinese men who are smokers) 14.22 months (mean) Pictures
Acevedo et al.[22] 2011 fMRI Long-term intense passionate love Married 10–29 years Pictures
Acevedo et al.[83] 2012 fMRI Marital satisfaction in long-term passionate love relationships Married 21.4 years (mean) Pictures
Takahashi et al.[73] 2015 PET Early-stage passionate love in relationships 17 months (median) Pictures

Role of the limbic system

The role of the limbic system in emotion was first explained by James Papez in 1937 within his paper titled "A proposed mechanism of emotion". The model described is known as the Papez circuit. The Papez circuit highlighted the presence of neuronal pathways between the vestibular and the limbic system.[84] The vestibular apparatus is in the inner ear and coordinates the body balance and movement. This requires extensive neuronal networking. Vestibular stimulation, which comes from the apparatus, can cause changes in mood and emotion. It can also impact emotions either independently or as part of the general limbic system networks by influencing the hypothalamus. These emotions can include extreme passivity, loss of drive/motivation, excessive eating and drinking, and rage and violent behavior.[84] Studies show Romantic Love uses reward and motivation systems to focus on a specific individual. The limbic cortical regions process individual emotion factors.[57]

Love and motivation

Conscious thoughts about a romantic partner activate brain regions related to reward and motivation. Ortigue et al. investigated whether unconscious priming by a partner's name could also affect motivation. They found that priming by either a beloved or a favorite hobby improved reaction times in identifying whether a string of letters was a word or not compared against priming by a neutral friend. The authors suggest this effect happens because a beloved's name "may call for a goal-directed state" and produce "dopaminergic-driven facilitation effects."[77] Similarly, the love one feels for their friends may also be biologically motivated. Isern-Mas and Gomila argue that while the love we feel for our friends is not romantic, it is still motivated through feelings of moral obligations as well as changes in the brain resulting from prosocial experiences.[85] The common motivation whether it be love romantically or through a non-intimate companion can be connected to positive feelings and rewards that in turn, form social bonds.[86] As seen in other animals as well, the immediate connections between the love of a mother and their infant impacts their personality as they age.[87]  Harlow described love as a secondary drive for all animals, but it is essential for proper development. The animals that were left abandoned, had trouble socializing with others and often had personality issues as well.[87] The Behavioral Activation System (BAS), which plays a role in directing behavior, is believed to play a role in romantic love.[1]

See also

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  2. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  3. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  4. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  5. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  6. ↑ a b c d e f g h i j k Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. ↑ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. ↑ a b c d e f g h i j Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  13. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. ↑ a b c d e f g h i j k l Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. ↑ a b c d e f g h Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. ↑ a b c d e f g h Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  20. ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  21. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. ↑ a b c d e f g h Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  23. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  25. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  26. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  27. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  28. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  29. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  30. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".: "Passionate love, obsessive love, being in love, whatever you wish to call it. [...] In short, Explorers preferentially sought Explorers, Builders sought other Builders, and Directors and Negotiators were drawn to one another."
  31. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  32. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  33. ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  34. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  35. ↑ a b c d e Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  37. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  38. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  39. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".: "Tennov (1979) used the term limerence to refer to a kind of infatuated, all-absorbing passion — the kind of love that Dante felt for Beatrice, or that Juliet and Romeo felt for each other. Tennov argued that an important feature of limerence is that it should be unrequited, or at least unfulfilled. It consists of a state of intense longing for the other person, in which the individual becomes more or less obsessed by that person and spends much of their time fantasising about them. [...] Tennov suggests that limerence can only really last if external conditions are such that it remains unfulfilled: it is not uncommon for people to maintain a state of limerence about someone who is unreachable for some years; but if the desired person should actually come within reach, so that the desired relationship begins, then the limerence becomes extinguished and the attraction sometimes disappears very quickly."
  40. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "[Tennov] discovered that many who considered themselves 'madly in love' had similar descriptions of their emotions and actions. She chose the label limerence to describe an intense longing and desire for another person that is much stronger than a simple infatuation, but not the same as a long-lived love that could last a life-time. [...] In 2002, Helen Fisher, PhD, in concert with other researchers, published the article 'Defining the Brain Systems of Lust, Romantic Attraction, and Attachment' in the Archives of Sexual Behavior. Considered a leading researcher [...], she and her research colleagues have identified several characteristics of a person who is 'madly in love,' or, as we put it, in limerence."
  41. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. ↑ The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited by David M. Buss, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005. Chapter 14, Commitment, Love, and Mate Retention by Lorne Campbell B. and Bruce J. Ellis.
  43. ↑ "Evolutionary psychology: the emperor's new paradigm" by D. J. Buller in Trends Cogn. Sci. (2005) Volume 9 pages 277-283.
  44. ↑ The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature Template:Webarchive by Geoffrey F. Miller in Psycoloquy (2001) 12,#8.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  45. ↑ Evolution of human music through sexual selection by G. F. Miller in N. L. Wallin, B. Merker, & S. Brown (Eds.), The origins of music, MIT Press, (2000). pp. 329-360.
  46. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  47. ↑ Griffith J. 2011. What is Love?. In The Book of Real Answers to Everything Template:ISBN. http://www.worldtransformation.com/what-is-love/
  48. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "There are certainly some striking similarities between love and addiction[.] [...] At first, addiction is maintained by pleasure, but the intensity of this pleasure gradually diminishes and the addiction is then maintained by the avoidance of pain. [...] The 'addiction' is to a person, or an experience, not a chemical. [...] [O]ne of the characteristics shared by addicts and lovers is that they both obsess. The addict is always preoccupied by the next 'fix' or 'hit', while the lover is always preoccupied by the beloved. Such obsessions are associated with compulsive urges to seek out what is desired [...]."
  50. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  51. ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  52. ↑ a b c d e f Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  53. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  54. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  55. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  56. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "Most [neurons which produce dopamine] have their cell bodies in two contiguous regions of the midbrain, the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and the ventral tegmental area (VTA). [...] Neurons from the VTA innervate the ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens), olfactory bulb, amygdala, hippocampus, orbital and medial prefrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex. [...] [D]opamine confers motivational salience ("wanting") on the reward itself or associated cues (nucleus accumbens shell region), updates the value placed on different goals in light of this new experience (orbital prefrontal cortex), helps consolidate multiple forms of memory (amygdala and hippocampus), and encodes new motor programs that will facilitate obtaining this reward in the future (nucleus accumbens core region and dorsal striatum). [...] Dopamine acts in the nucleus accumbens to attach motivational significance to stimuli associated with rewards (such as food). [...] The brain reward circuitry targeted by addictive drugs [...] includes the dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the mid-brain to the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and other forebrain structures. [...] A reward is a stimulus that the brain interprets as intrinsically positive or as something to be approached. A reinforcing stimulus is one that increases the probability that behaviors paired with it will be repeated. [...] The neural substrates that underlie the perception of reward and the phenomenon of positive reinforcement are a set of interconnected forebrain structures called brain reward pathways; these include the nucleus accumbens (NAc; the major component of the ventral striatum), the basal forebrain (components of which have been termed the extended amygdala [...]), hippocampus, hypothalamus, and frontal regions of cerebral cortex. These structures receive rich dopaminergic innervation from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the midbrain."
  57. ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  58. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  59. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  60. ↑ Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  61. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  62. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  63. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  65. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  66. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  67. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  68. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  69. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  70. ↑ a b c d e f Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  71. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  72. ↑ a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  74. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  75. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  77. ↑ a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  78. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  79. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  80. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  81. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  82. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  83. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  84. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  85. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  86. ↑ Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  87. ↑ a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Bibliography

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

External links

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

Script error: No such module "navboxes". Script error: No such module "Navbox". Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Biology-footer Script error: No such module "Navbox". Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Emotion-footerScript error: No such module "navboxes".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Biology_of_romantic_love&oldid=2592497"