Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria
Template:Short description Template:Use Australian English Template:Use dmy dates Template:More footnotes Script error: No such module "infobox".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria,[1] is a High Court of Australia case that dealt with Section 90 of the Constitution of Australia. In this case, following on from such cases as Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria,[2] Barwick CJ accepted the broad approach to the definition of an excise, but rejected the formalistic criterion of liability approach for determining if the excise falls at the relevant step. He adopted the substance over form approach, or the substantial effects doctrine, in that there are many factors to be considered, for example, the indirectness of the tax, its effect on the cost of goods and its proximity to the production or distribution of the goods.
See also
References
<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />
- ↑ Anderson's Pty Ltd v Victoria [1964] HCA 77, (1964) 111 CLR 353 (17 December 1964), High Court.
- ↑ Dennis Hotels Pty Ltd v Victoria [1960] HCA 10, (1960) 104 CLR 529 (26 February 1960), High Court.
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
- Winterton, G. et al. Australian federal constitutional law: commentary and materials, 1999. LBC Information Services, Sydney.