Sultanate of Sulu: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Manto.online
Latest updates in Malaysian Philippines tensions over Sabah since November 2024
 
Tausug doesn't have "E" on their Rumi (Latin) script. When it comes to Malay loanwords, such as this "kesultanan", it is spelled and pronounced as "kasultanan".
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Monarchy in the Philippines since 1457}}
{{Short description|1457–1915 state in Southeast Asia}}
{{other uses|Sulu (disambiguation)}}
{{other uses|Sulu (disambiguation)}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}}{{Use Philippine English|date=February 2021}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}}{{Use Philippine English|date=February 2021}}
{{Expert needed|Philippines|reason=Clarification as to the present-day existence of this entity|talk=Existence of the Sultanate of Sulu today|date=June 2025}}
{{Infobox country
{{Infobox country
| conventional_long_name = Sultanate of Sulu
| conventional_long_name = Sultanate of Sulu
Line 7: Line 8:
| native_name            = كَسُلْتَنَنْ سِنْ سُوْݢْ<br />''Kasultanan sin Sūg''
| native_name            = كَسُلْتَنَنْ سِنْ سُوْݢْ<br />''Kasultanan sin Sūg''
| image_flag            = Late 19th Century Flag of Sulu.svg
| image_flag            = Late 19th Century Flag of Sulu.svg
| image_coat            = Sultanate of Sulu Coat of Arms (Lesser).svg
| symbol_type            = Lesser coat of arms
| image_map              = Map_of_the_Sultanate_of_Sulu.png
| image_map              = Map_of_the_Sultanate_of_Sulu.png
| capital                = {{plainlist|
| capital                = {{plainlist|
*[[Indanan#Barangays|Buansa]] {{small|(1457–1878)}}
*[[Indanan#Barangays|Buansa]] {{small|(1457–1878)}}
*[[Maimbung, Sulu|Maimbung]] {{small|(1878–1893)}}<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/41771/41771-h/41771-h.htm|title=The History of Sulu|first=Najeeb Mitry|last=Saleeby (1870–1935)|website=www.gutenberg.org}}</ref>
*[[Maimbung, Sulu|Maimbung]] {{small|(1878–1893)}}<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/41771/41771-h/41771-h.htm|title=The History of Sulu|first=Najeeb Mitry|last=Saleeby (1870–1935)|website=www.gutenberg.org}}</ref>
*[[Palawan]] {{small|(1893–1915)}}<ref>{{Citation |publisher=NIU |url=http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/Modules/Modules/MuslimMindanao/historical_timeline_of_the_royal.htm |title=Historical Timeline of The Royal Sultanate of Sulu Including Related Events of Neighboring Peoples |first=Josiah |last=C |access-date=21 December 2010 |archive-date=29 April 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120429112342/http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/Modules/Modules/MuslimMindanao/historical_timeline_of_the_royal.htm |url-status=dead }}.</ref>}}
*[[Palawan]] {{small|(1893–1915)}}<ref>{{Citation |publisher=NIU |url=http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/Modules/Modules/MuslimMindanao/historical_timeline_of_the_royal.htm |title=Historical Timeline of The Royal Sultanate of Sulu Including Related Events of Neighboring Peoples |first=Josiah |last=C |access-date=21 December 2010 |archive-date=29 April 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120429112342/http://www.seasite.niu.edu/Tagalog/Modules/Modules/MuslimMindanao/historical_timeline_of_the_royal.htm |url-status=dead}}.</ref>}}
| religion              = [[Sunni Islam]]
| religion              = [[Sunni Islam]]
| demonym                =  
| demonym                =  
| government_type        = [[Absolute monarchy]]
| government_type        = Unitary Islamic [[absolute monarchy]]<ref>{{Harvnb|Orosa|1931|p=58}}: "The sultan of Sulu has formally renounced his rights of sovereignty; but prior to the advent of the Americans, he was an absolute monarch, except so far as his government had come under Spanish control."</ref>
| area_km2              =  
| area_km2              =  
| area_rank              =  
| area_rank              =  
Line 27: Line 26:
| status                = Protectorate
| status                = Protectorate
| status_text            = [[Bruneian Empire|Bruneian]] [[Vassal state|vassal]] {{nobr|{{small|(1457–1578)}}}} <br />Sovereign state {{nobr|{{small|(1578–1851)}}}} <br />{{nobr|[[Spanish Empire|Spanish]] [[protectorate]] {{small|(1851–1899)}}}}<br />[[United States|U.S.]] protectorate {{nobr|{{small|(1899–1915)}}}}
| status_text            = [[Bruneian Empire|Bruneian]] [[Vassal state|vassal]] {{nobr|{{small|(1457–1578)}}}} <br />Sovereign state {{nobr|{{small|(1578–1851)}}}} <br />{{nobr|[[Spanish Empire|Spanish]] [[protectorate]] {{small|(1851–1899)}}}}<br />[[United States|U.S.]] protectorate {{nobr|{{small|(1899–1915)}}}}
| year_end              = 1915
| life_span              = {{plainlist|
| life_span              = 1457–present<ref>{{cite web |last1=BEYER |first1=HENRY |title=Brief Memorandum on the Government of the Sultanate of Sulu and Powers of the Sultan during the 19TH Century |url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1946/12/08/brief-memorandum-on-the-government-of-the-sultanate-of-sulu-and-powers-of-the-sultan-during-the-19th-century/ |website=Official Gazette |access-date=26 February 2025}}</ref>
* 1457–present{{#Tag:Ref|H. Otley Beyer in 1946: "'''The Sultanate of Sulu was in no wise abolished by the Carpenter Agreement'''; but the sultan and his council merely relinquished their temporal powers to be exercised by regularly appointed or elected officials of the Philippine Government. It is generally believed that only the Sulu people themselves (through a plebiscite or an elected popular assembly) could legitimately abolish the Sultanate."<ref name=":0" />{{Additional citation needed|date=June 2025}}|group="note"}}
| year_start            = 1457
* 1457–1915 (''[[de facto]]'')}}<!--Please see talk page regarding the existence of the Sultanate of Sulu beyond 1915.-->
| flag_type              = Flag (19th century)
| flag_type              = Flag (19th century)
| image_map_caption      = Map showing the extent of the Sultanate of Sulu in 1845, with Northeast Borneo lowlands being under its nominal control.
| image_map_caption      = Map showing the extent of the Sultanate of Sulu in 1845, with Northeast Borneo lowlands being under its nominal control.
| common_languages      = [[Tausug language|Tausug]], [[Sama–Bajaw languages|Sama–Bajau]], [[Malay language|Malay]]
| common_languages      = [[Tausug language|Tausug]], [[Sama–Bajaw languages|Sama–Bajau]], [[Malay language|Malay]]
| title_leader          = [[List of Sultans of Sulu|Sultan]]
| title_leader          = [[List of sultans of Sulu|Sultan]]
| year_leader1          = 1457–1480 (first)
| year_leader1          = 1457–1480 (first)
| leader1                = [[Sharif ul-Hashim of Sulu|Sharif ul-Hāshim]]
| leader1                = [[Sharif ul-Hashim of Sulu|Sharif ul-Hāshim]]
| year_leader2          = 1986–present (incumbent)
| year_leader2          = <!--1894–1915 (last)-->
| leader2                = [[Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram]]
| leader2                = <!--[[Jamalul Kiram II]] There is an ongoing discussion at the talk page regarding successors, if any, to Jamalul Kiram II. Please do not edit this until consensus is achieved or multiple proper, reliable secondary sources are given.-->
| legislature            = [[Ruma Bechara]]
| event_start            =  
| event_start            =  
| date_start            =  
| date_start            =  
| event_end              = {{nobr|Temporal power ceded}} to the United States
| year_start            = {{circa}} 1457
| event1                =
| date_event1            =
| event2                = Cession of North Borneo
| date_event2            = 22 January 1878
| event_end              = Temporal power ceded to the United States
| date_end              = 22 March
| date_end              = 22 March
| p1                    = Lupah Sug
| year_end              = 1915
| flag_p2               = Old Flag of Brunei.svg
| p1                     = Ancient barangay
| p2                     = Lupah Sug
| p3                    = Sultanate of Brunei (1368–1888){{!}}{{nobr|Sultanate of Brunei}}
| flag_p3               = Old Flag of Brunei.svg
| s1                    = Captaincy General of the Philippines{{!}}'''1702'''<br />Captaincy General of the Philippines
| s1                    = Captaincy General of the Philippines{{!}}'''1702'''<br />Captaincy General of the Philippines
| flag_s1                = Flag of New Spain.svg
| flag_s1                = Flag of New Spain.svg
Line 61: Line 69:
*[[Indonesia]]}}
*[[Indonesia]]}}
}}
}}
 
The '''Sultanate of Sulu''' ({{langx|tsg|Kasultanan sin Sūg}}; {{langx|ms|Kesultanan Suluk}}; {{langx|fil|Kasultanan ng Sulu}}) is a Sunni Muslim [[monarchy]]{{#Tag:Ref|According to [[H. Otley Beyer]], "The Sultanate of Sulu was in no wise abolished by the Carpenter Agreement; but the sultan and his council merely relinquished their temporal powers to be exercised by regularly appointed or elected officials of the Philippine Government."<ref>{{cite web |last1=BEYER |first1=HENRY |title=Brief Memorandum on the Government of the Sultanate of Sulu and Powers of the Sultan during the 19TH Century |url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1946/12/08/brief-memorandum-on-the-government-of-the-sultanate-of-sulu-and-powers-of-the-sultan-during-the-19th-century/ |website=Official Gazette |access-date=26 February 2025}}</ref>|group="note"}} in the [[Philippines]]<ref>{{cite web |title=Acceptance by the Republic of the Philippines of the Cession and Transfer of the Terriroty of North Borneo by His Highness, Sultan Mohammad Esmail Kiram, Sultan of Sulu, Acting with the Consent and Approval of the Ruma Bechara, in Council Assembled, to the Republic of the Philippines |url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1962/04/25/philippine-claim-to-a-portion-of-north-borneo-acceptance-by-the-republic-of-the-philippines-of-the-cession-and-transfer-of-the-terriroty-of-north-borneo-by-his-highness-sultan-mohammad-esmail-kiram/ |website=Official Gazette |access-date=26 February 2025}}</ref><ref name="memo order 427"/>{{#Tag:Ref|Compare with the [[Sultanate of Yogyakarta]], a [[monarchy]] in the Republic of [[Indonesia]]|group="note"}} that includes the [[Sulu Archipelago]], coastal areas of [[Zamboanga City]] and certain portions of [[Palawan]] in the today's [[Philippines]], alongside parts of present-day [[Sabah]] and [[North Kalimantan]] in north-eastern [[Borneo]].
The '''Sultanate of Sulu''' ({{langx|tsg|Kasultanan sin Sūg}}; {{langx|ms|Kesultanan Suluk}}; {{langx|fil|Kasultanan ng Sulu}}) is a Sunni Muslim [[subnational monarchy]] in the [[Philippines|Republic of the Philippines]]<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 10, 1974 |title=Memorandum Order No. 427, s. 1974 |url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1974/05/10/memorandum-order-no-427-s-1974/ |access-date=June 12, 2025 |website=Official Gazette}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=April 25, 1962 |title=Acceptance by the Republic of the Philippines of the cession and transfer of the terriroty of North Borneo by His Highness, Sultan Mohammad Esmail Kiram, Sultan of Sulu, acting with the consent and approval of the Ruma Bechara, in council assembled, to the Republic of the Philippines |url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1962/04/25/philippine-claim-to-a-portion-of-north-borneo-acceptance-by-the-republic-of-the-philippines-of-the-cession-and-transfer-of-the-terriroty-of-north-borneo-by-his-highness-sultan-mohammad-esmail-kiram/?__cf_chl_tk=p0gD9qLcOgkvDuQSTU2mA8Ho3CBQ1MZuD1wTVvWUzzY-1748304107-1.0.1.1-yx_wD.6MtAOFgVuQiH21NwLpA8Bq41Dp3YNU_fn0JKQ |access-date=June 12, 2025 |website=Official Gazette}}</ref><ref name=":0" />{{Dubious|1=Existence of the Sultanate of Sulu today|date=June 2025}} that ruled the [[Sulu Archipelago]], coastal areas of [[Zamboanga City]] and certain portions of [[Palawan]] in the today's [[Philippines]], alongside parts of present-day [[Sabah]] and [[North Kalimantan]] in north-eastern [[Borneo]].
{{History of the Philippines}}
{{History of the Philippines}}
{{Pre-hispanic History of the Philippines}}
{{Pre-hispanic History of the Philippines}}
The sultanate was founded either on 17 November 1405 or 1457<ref>{{Harvnb|Abinales|Amoroso|2005|p=44}}</ref>{{#Tag:Ref|The generally accepted date of the establishment of the sultanate by modern historians is 1457. However, the [[National Historical Commission of the Philippines]] list the date as "around 1450", or simply "1450s",<ref>{{cite book|title=Philippine Almanac & Handbook of Facts|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uWzjAAAAMAAJ|year=1977}}</ref> due to uncertainty. On the other hand, independent Muslim studies marked the day to a more exact date 17 November 1405 (24th of [[Jumada al-awwal]], 808 [[Hijri year|AH]]).<ref name="Heirs of Sulu Sultanate urged to attend general convention">{{cite web|last=Usman|first=Edd|title=Heirs of Sulu Sultanate urged to attend general convention|website=[[Manila Bulletin]] |url=http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/242781/heirs-sulu-sultanate-urged-attend-general-convention|access-date=21 December 2010|date=10 February 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120614134808/http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/242781/heirs-sulu-sultanate-urged-attend-general-convention|archive-date=14 June 2012}}</ref>{{Sfn |Cavendish|2007|p=1178}} |group="note"}} by [[Johore]]-born explorer and Sunni [[religious scholar]] [[Sharif ul-Hāshim of Sulu|Sharif ul-Hashim]]. ''Paduka Mahasari Maulana al Sultan Sharif ul-Hashim'' became his full [[regnal name]]; ''Sharif-ul Hashim'' is his abbreviated name. He settled in Buansa, [[Sulu]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Abdurahman|first1=Habib Jamasali Sharief Rajah Bassal|title=The Sultanate of Sulu: Their Dominion|date=2002|publisher=Astoria Print & Publishing Company|location=University of Michigan|isbn=9789719262701|pages=88|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_QpxAAAAMAAJ&q=balfaqi%20alawi%20sulu%20sultan}}</ref><ref name="Genealogy of Sultan Sharif Ul-Hashim of Sulu Sultanate" /> The sultanate gained its independence from the [[Bruneian Empire]] in 1578.<ref name="RingSalkin1996">{{cite book|title=International Dictionary of Historic Places: Asia and Oceania|first1=Trudy|last1=Ring|first2=Robert M.|last2=Salkin| first3=Sharon|last3=La Boda|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vWLRxJEU49EC&pg=PA160|date= 1996|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-1-884964-04-6|page=160}}</ref>
The sultanate was founded either on 17 November 1405 or 1457<ref>{{Harvnb|Abinales|Amoroso|2005|p=44}}</ref>{{#Tag:Ref|The generally accepted date of the establishment of the sultanate by modern historians is 1457. However, the [[National Historical Commission of the Philippines]] list the date as "around 1450", or simply "1450s",<ref>{{cite book|title=Philippine Almanac & Handbook of Facts|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uWzjAAAAMAAJ|year=1977}}</ref> due to uncertainty. On the other hand, independent Muslim studies marked the day to a more exact date 17 November 1405 (24th of [[Jumada al-awwal]], 808 [[Hijri year|AH]]).<ref name="Heirs of Sulu Sultanate urged to attend general convention">{{cite web|last=Usman|first=Edd|title=Heirs of Sulu Sultanate urged to attend general convention|website=[[Manila Bulletin]] |url=http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/242781/heirs-sulu-sultanate-urged-attend-general-convention|access-date=21 December 2010|date=10 February 2010|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120614134808/http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/242781/heirs-sulu-sultanate-urged-attend-general-convention|archive-date=14 June 2012}}</ref>{{Sfn |Cavendish|2007|p=1178}} |group="note"}} by [[Johore]]-born explorer and Sunni [[religious scholar]] [[Sharif ul-Hāshim of Sulu|Sharif ul-Hashim]]. ''Paduka Mahasari Maulana al Sultan Sharif ul-Hashim'' became his full [[regnal name]]; ''Sharif-ul Hashim'' is his abbreviated name. He settled in Buansa, [[Sulu]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Abdurahman|first1=Habib Jamasali Sharief Rajah Bassal|title=The Sultanate of Sulu: Their Dominion|date=2002|publisher=Astoria Print & Publishing Company|location=University of Michigan|isbn=9789719262701|pages=88|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_QpxAAAAMAAJ&q=balfaqi%20alawi%20sulu%20sultan}}</ref><ref name="Genealogy of Sultan Sharif Ul-Hashim of Sulu Sultanate" /> The sultanate gained its independence from the [[Bruneian Empire]] in 1578.<ref name="RingSalkin1996">{{cite book|title=International Dictionary of Historic Places: Asia and Oceania|first1=Trudy|last1=Ring|first2=Robert M.|last2=Salkin| first3=Sharon|last3=La Boda|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vWLRxJEU49EC&pg=PA160|date= 1996|publisher=Taylor & Francis|isbn=978-1-884964-04-6|page=160}}</ref>


At its peak, it stretched over the islands that bordered the western peninsula of [[Zamboanga Peninsula|Zamboanga]] in [[Mindanao]] in the east to [[Palawan]] in the north. It also covered areas in the northeast of [[Borneo]], stretching from [[Marudu Bay]], [[Sabah]]<ref>{{cite book|first=Muzium|last=Brunei|title=Brunei Museum Journal|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TumHAAAAIAAJ|year=1969|quote=The area from Kimanis Bay to the Paitan River not from Sulu but from Brunei}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Malay_states.htm#Sabah|title=Sabah|first=Ben|last=Cahoon|publisher=worldstatesmen.org|access-date=9 October 2014|quote=Sultan of Brunei cedes the lands east of Marudu Bay to the Sultanate of Sulu.}}</ref> to Tepian, Sembakung subdistrict, [[North Kalimantan]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Keppel|p=385}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Campbell|2007|p=53}}</ref> Another source stated the area included stretched from [[Kimanis Bay]], which also overlaps with the boundaries of the [[Bruneian Sultanate]].<ref>{{cite book|first=Graham|last=Saunders|title=A History of Brunei|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DUv8AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA84|date=2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-136-87394-2|pages=84–}}</ref> Following the arrival of [[Western world|western powers]] such as the [[Spanish East Indies|Spanish]], the [[British North Borneo|British]], the [[Dutch East Indies|Dutch]], [[French Indochina|French]], [[German colonial empire|Germans]], and the [[United States|Americans]], the Sultan [[thalassocracy]] and sovereign political powers were relinquished by 1915 through an agreement that was signed with the [[Insular Government of the Philippine Islands|United States]].<ref name="KempFry2004">{{cite book|first1=Graham|last1=Kemp|first2=Douglas P.|last2=Fry|title=Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies Around the World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mimdCjpaGN0C&pg=PA124|year=2004|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-415-94761-9|pages=124–}}</ref><ref name="NathanKamali2005">{{cite book|author1=K.S. Nathan|author2=Mohammad Hashim Kamali|title=Islam in Southeast Asia: Political, Social and Strategic Challenges for the 21st Century|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O8d6BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA52|date=2005|publisher=Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|isbn=978-981-230-282-3|pages=52–}}</ref><ref name="dreaming Sultan">{{cite news|url=http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=84741|title=Why 'Sultan' is dreaming|newspaper=Daily Express|date=27 March 2013|access-date=27 March 2013}}</ref><ref name="carpenter">{{cite web|url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1915/03/22/memorandum-carpenter-agreement-march-22-1915/ |title=Memorandum: Carpenter Agreement |publisher=[[Government of the Philippines]] |date=22 March 1915 |access-date=17 October 2015}}</ref> In 1974, the Filipino government officially recognized the historical territories of the Sultanate and the head of the [[Royal House of Sulu|royal house]] as the Sultan of Sulu.<ref name="memo order 427">{{cite web|url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1974/05/10/memorandum-order-no-427-s-1974/|title=Memorandum Order No. 427, s. 1974|date=10 May 1974|publisher=Government of the Philippines|work=CDAsia|accessdate=2 October 2016}}</ref>
At its peak, it stretched over the islands that bordered the western peninsula of [[Zamboanga Peninsula|Zamboanga]] in [[Mindanao]] in the east to [[Palawan]] in the north. It also covered areas in the northeast of [[Borneo]], stretching from [[Marudu Bay]], [[Sabah]]<ref>{{cite book|first=Muzium|last=Brunei|title=Brunei Museum Journal|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TumHAAAAIAAJ|year=1969|quote=The area from Kimanis Bay to the Paitan River not from Sulu but from Brunei}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Malay_states.htm#Sabah|title=Sabah|first=Ben|last=Cahoon|publisher=worldstatesmen.org|access-date=9 October 2014|quote=Sultan of Brunei cedes the lands east of Marudu Bay to the Sultanate of Sulu.}}</ref> to Tepian, Sembakung subdistrict, [[North Kalimantan]].<ref>{{Harvnb|Keppel|p=385}}</ref><ref>{{Harvnb|Campbell|2007|p=53}}</ref> Another source stated the area included stretched from [[Kimanis Bay]], which also overlaps with the boundaries of the [[Bruneian Sultanate]].<ref>{{cite book|first=Graham|last=Saunders|title=A History of Brunei|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DUv8AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA84|date=2013|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-136-87394-2|pages=84–}}</ref> Following the arrival of [[Western world|western powers]] such as the [[Spanish East Indies|Spanish]], the [[British North Borneo|British]], the [[Dutch East Indies|Dutch]], [[French Indochina|French]], [[German colonial empire|Germans]], and the [[United States|Americans]], the Sultan [[thalassocracy]] and its sovereign political powers were relinquished by 1915 through an agreement, known as the Carpenter Agreement, that was signed with the [[Insular Government of the Philippine Islands|United States]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name="KempFry2004">{{cite book|first1=Graham|last1=Kemp|first2=Douglas P.|last2=Fry|title=Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies Around the World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mimdCjpaGN0C&pg=PA124|year=2004|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-415-94761-9|pages=124–}}</ref><ref name="NathanKamali2005">{{cite book|author1=K.S. Nathan|author2=Mohammad Hashim Kamali|title=Islam in Southeast Asia: Political, Social and Strategic Challenges for the 21st Century|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O8d6BwAAQBAJ&pg=PA52|date=2005|publisher=Institute of Southeast Asian Studies|isbn=978-981-230-282-3|pages=52–}}</ref><ref name="dreaming Sultan">{{cite news|url=http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=84741|title=Why 'Sultan' is dreaming|newspaper=Daily Express|date=27 March 2013|access-date=27 March 2013}}</ref><ref name="carpenter">{{cite web|url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1915/03/22/memorandum-carpenter-agreement-march-22-1915/ |title=Memorandum: Carpenter Agreement |publisher=[[Government of the Philippines]] |date=22 March 1915 |access-date=17 October 2015}}</ref>


In [[Nagarakretagama|Kakawin Nagarakretagama]], the Sultanate of Sulu is referred to as Solot, one of the countries in the Tanjungnagara archipelago (Kalimantan-Philippines), which is one of the areas that is under the influence of the mandala area of the [[Majapahit]] kingdom in the archipelago.
In [[Nagarakretagama|Kakawin Nagarakretagama]], the Sultanate of Sulu is referred to as Solot, one of the countries in the Tanjungnagara archipelago (Kalimantan-Philippines), which is one of the areas that is under the influence of the mandala area of the [[Majapahit]] kingdom in the archipelago.
Line 95: Line 103:
{{See also|Islam in the Philippines}}
{{See also|Islam in the Philippines}}
{{main|List of Sultans of Sulu}}
{{main|List of Sultans of Sulu}}
The Sulu Archipelago was an [[entrepôt]] that attracted merchants from south China and various parts of Southeast Asia beginning in the 14th century.<ref name="Donoso">{{Harvnb|Donoso|2022|p=505}}</ref> The name "Sulu" is attested in Chinese historical records as early as 1349,<ref name="Abinales-43">{{Harvnb|Abinales|Amoroso|2005|p=43}}</ref> during the late [[Yuan dynasty]] (1271–1368), suggesting trade relations around this time.<ref name="gunn-93">{{Harvnb|Gunn|2011|p=93}}</ref> Trade continued into the early [[Ming dynasty]] (1368–1644); envoys were sent in several missions to China to trade and [[Tributary system of China|pay tribute]] to [[Emperor of China|the emperor]]. Sulu merchants often exchanged goods with [[Chinese Muslims]], and also traded with Muslims of [[Arab Muslims|Arab]], [[Islam in Iran|Persian]], [[Islam in Southeast Asia|Malay]], or [[Islam in India|Indian]] descent.<ref name="Donoso"/> Islamic historian [[Cesar Adib Majul]] argues that Islam was introduced to the Sulu Archipelago in the late 14th century by Chinese and Arab merchants and missionaries from [[Ming China]].<ref name="Abinales-43" /><ref name="gunn-93" /> The seven Arab missionaries were called "Lumpang Basih" by the Tausug, and  were Sunni Sufi scholars from the [[Ba 'Alawi sada]] of Yemen.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Quiling |first1=Mucha-Shim |title=Lumpang Basih |journal=Journal of Studies on Traditional Knowledge in Sulu Archipelago and Its People, and in the Neighboring Nusantara |date=2020 |volume=3 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42073637 |access-date=20 May 2023}}</ref>
The Sulu Archipelago was an [[entrepôt]] that attracted merchants from south China and various parts of Southeast Asia beginning in the 14th century.<ref name="Donoso">{{Harvnb|Donoso|2022|p=505}}</ref> The name "Sulu" is attested in Chinese historical records as early as 1349,<ref name="Abinales-43">{{Harvnb|Abinales|Amoroso|2005|p=43}}</ref> during the late [[Yuan dynasty]] (1271–1368), suggesting trade relations around this time.<ref name="gunn-93">{{Harvnb|Gunn|2011|p=93}}</ref> Trade continued into the early [[Ming dynasty]] (1368–1644); envoys were sent in several missions to China to trade and [[Tributary system of China|pay tribute]] to [[Emperor of China|the emperor]]. Sulu merchants often exchanged goods with [[Chinese Muslims]], and also traded with Muslims of [[Arab Muslims|Arab]], [[Islam in Iran|Persian]], [[Islam in Southeast Asia|Malay]], or [[Islam in India|Indian]] descent.<ref name="Donoso"/> Islamic historian [[Cesar Adib Majul]] argues that Islam was introduced to the Sulu Archipelago in the late 14th century by Chinese and Arab merchants and missionaries from [[Ming China]].<ref name="Abinales-43" /><ref name="gunn-93" /> The seven Arab missionaries were called "Lumpang Basih" by the Tausug, and  were Sunni Sufi scholars from the [[Ba 'Alawi sada]] of Yemen.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Quiling |first1=Mucha-Shim |title=Lumpang Basih |journal=Journal of Studies on Traditional Knowledge in Sulu Archipelago and Its People, and in the Neighboring Nusantara |date=2020 |volume=3 |url=https://www.academia.edu/42073637 |access-date=20 May 2023}}</ref> A yellow-colored flag was used in Sulu by the Chinese community.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.royalpanji.net/the_chinese_community_in__sulu_sultanate.html|title=The Chinese Community in Sulu Sultanate |last=paopadd}}{{unreliable source?|date=October 2016}}</ref>


Around this time, a notable Arab judge, [[Sunni]] [[Sufi]] and [[religious scholar]] [[Makhdum Karim|Karim ul-Makhdum]]<ref group="note">Also ''Karimul Makhdum'', ''Karimal Makdum'' or ''Makhdum Karim'' among others. Makhdum came from the Arabic word ''makhdūmīn'', which means "master".</ref> from [[Mecca]] arrived in Malacca. He preached Islam, particularly the Ash'ari Aqeeda and Shafi'i Madh'hab as well as the [[Qadiriyya]] Tariqa, and many citizens, including the ruler of [[Malacca Sultanate|Malacca]], converted to Islam.<ref name="Saleeby%20158-159">{{Harvnb|Saleeby|1908|pp=158–159}}</ref> Sulu leader [[Paduka Pahala]] and his sons moved to China, where he died. Chinese Muslims brought up his sons in [[Dezhou#Sulu Royal Family|Dezhou]], where their descendants live and have the surnames An and Wen. In 1380 CE,<ref group="note">Another uncertain date in Philippine Islamic history is the year of arrival of Karim ul-Makhdum. Though other Muslim scholars place the date as simply "the end of 14th century", Saleeby calculated the year as 1380 AD corresponding to the description of the ''tarsilas'', in which Karim ul-Makhdum's coming is ten years before Rajah Baguinda's. The 1380 reference originated from the event in Islamic history when a huge number of ''makhdūmīn'' started to travel to Southeast Asia from India. See Ibrahim's "Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia."</ref> Karim ul-Makhdum arrived in [[Simunul, Tawi-Tawi|Simunul island]] from Malacca, again with Arab traders. Apart from being a scholar, he operated as a trader; some see him as a Sufi missionary from Mecca.<ref name="Larousse%2040">{{Harvnb|Larousse|2001|p=40}}</ref> He preached Islam, and was accepted by the core Muslim community. He was the second person to preach Islam in the area, after Tuan Mashā′ikha. To facilitate conversion of nonbelievers, he established a mosque in Tubig-Indagan, Simunul, the first Islamic temple to be constructed in the area, or in the [[Philippines]]. This later became known as the [[Sheik Karimal Makdum Mosque]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Mawallil|first=Amilbahar|title=Simunul Island, Dubbed As 'Dubai of the Philippines', Pursues Ambitious Project |url=http://mindanaoexaminer.com/news.php?news_id=20090702181517|access-date=22 December 2010|newspaper=The Mindanao Examiner |date=3 July 2009|author2=Dayang Babylyn Kano Omar|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714095516/http://mindanaoexaminer.com/news.php?news_id=20090702181517|archive-date=14 July 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> He died in Sulu, although the exact location of his grave is unknown. In Buansa, he was known as Tuan Sharif Awliyā.<ref name="ibrahim 51"/> On his alleged grave in Bud Agad, Jolo, an inscription reads "Mohadum Aminullah Al-Nikad". In [[Lugus, Sulu|Lugus]], he is referred to as Abdurrahman. In [[Sibutu Island|Sibutu]], he is known by his name.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gonda|1975|p=91}}</ref> The differing beliefs about his grave's location came about because the [[Qadiri]] [[Shaykh]] Karim ul-Makhdum travelled to several islands in the [[Sulu Sea]] to preach Islam. In many places in the archipelago, he was beloved. It is said that the people of [[Tapul, Sulu|Tapul]] built a mosque honouring him and that they claim descent from Karim ul-Makhdum. The customs, beliefs and political laws of the people changed and adapted to adopt the Islamic tradition.<ref name="Saleeby%20159">{{Harvnb|Saleeby|1908|p=159}}</ref>
Around this time, a notable Arab judge, [[Sunni]] [[Sufi]] and [[religious scholar]] [[Makhdum Karim|Karim ul-Makhdum]]<ref group="note">Also ''Karimul Makhdum'', ''Karimal Makdum'' or ''Makhdum Karim'' among others. Makhdum came from the Arabic word ''makhdūmīn'', which means "master".</ref> from [[Mecca]] arrived in Malacca. He preached Islam, particularly the Ash'ari Aqeeda and Shafi'i Madh'hab as well as the [[Qadiriyya]] Tariqa, and many citizens, including the ruler of [[Malacca Sultanate|Malacca]], converted to Islam.<ref name="Saleeby%20158-159">{{Harvnb|Saleeby|1908|pp=158–159}}</ref> Sulu leader [[Paduka Pahala]] and his sons moved to China, where he died. Chinese Muslims brought up his sons in [[Dezhou#Sulu Royal Family|Dezhou]], where their descendants live and have the surnames An and Wen. In 1380 CE,<ref group="note">Another uncertain date in Philippine Islamic history is the year of arrival of Karim ul-Makhdum. Though other Muslim scholars place the date as simply "the end of 14th century", Saleeby calculated the year as 1380 AD corresponding to the description of the ''tarsilas'', in which Karim ul-Makhdum's coming is ten years before Rajah Baguinda's. The 1380 reference originated from the event in Islamic history when a huge number of ''makhdūmīn'' started to travel to Southeast Asia from India. See Ibrahim's "Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia."</ref> Karim ul-Makhdum arrived in [[Simunul, Tawi-Tawi|Simunul island]] from Malacca, again with Arab traders. Apart from being a scholar, he operated as a trader; some see him as a Sufi missionary from Mecca.<ref name="Larousse%2040">{{Harvnb|Larousse|2001|p=40}}</ref> He preached Islam, and was accepted by the core Muslim community. He was the second person to preach Islam in the area, after Tuan Mashā′ikha. To facilitate conversion of nonbelievers, he established a mosque in Tubig-Indagan, Simunul, the first Islamic temple to be constructed in the area, or in the [[Philippines]]. This later became known as the [[Sheik Karimal Makdum Mosque]].<ref>{{cite web|last=Mawallil|first=Amilbahar|title=Simunul Island, Dubbed As 'Dubai of the Philippines', Pursues Ambitious Project |url=http://mindanaoexaminer.com/news.php?news_id=20090702181517|access-date=22 December 2010|newspaper=The Mindanao Examiner |date=3 July 2009|author2=Dayang Babylyn Kano Omar|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714095516/http://mindanaoexaminer.com/news.php?news_id=20090702181517|archive-date=14 July 2011|url-status=dead}}</ref> He died in Sulu, although the exact location of his grave is unknown. In Buansa, he was known as Tuan Sharif Awliyā.<ref name="ibrahim 51"/> On his alleged grave in Bud Agad, Jolo, an inscription reads "Mohadum Aminullah Al-Nikad". In [[Lugus, Sulu|Lugus]], he is referred to as Abdurrahman. In [[Sibutu Island|Sibutu]], he is known by his name.<ref>{{Harvnb|Gonda|1975|p=91}}</ref> The differing beliefs about his grave's location came about because the [[Qadiri]] [[Shaykh]] Karim ul-Makhdum travelled to several islands in the [[Sulu Sea]] to preach Islam. In many places in the archipelago, he was beloved. It is said that the people of [[Tapul, Sulu|Tapul]] built a mosque honouring him and that they claim descent from Karim ul-Makhdum. The customs, beliefs and political laws of the people changed and adapted to adopt the Islamic tradition.<ref name="Saleeby%20159">{{Harvnb|Saleeby|1908|p=159}}</ref>
Line 114: Line 122:
=== Conquest of Northeastern Borneo ===
=== Conquest of Northeastern Borneo ===
{{See also|Sultanate of Bulungan}}
{{See also|Sultanate of Bulungan}}
[[File:18th Century Flag of Sulu.svg|thumb|left|18th century flag of the Sultanate of Sulu according to [[List of explorers|explorer]] [[Pierre Sonnerat]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.royalpanji.net/|title=Royal Panji|last=paopadd}}{{unreliable source?|date=October 2016}}</ref>]]
In 1746, [[Azim ud-Din I of Sulu|Sultan Azim ud-Din I]], with Spanish assistance, carried out punitive expeditions around the [[Sebuku River|Sebuku]] region against the [[Tidung people|Tidungs]] to reconsolidate his power in Borneo. By April 1747, the expeditions were declared a success and the chief of [[Tarakan]] declared his allegiance to Sulu. After the Sultan returned to Sulu, he brought back 50 captives who were previously under the hands of the Tidung and among them was a friar, while others were Tidung chiefs. Two of the Tidung chiefs were left in Jolo while the rest were brought to Zamboanga.<ref name=":1">Bond, Natan (December 2020). [https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/256433/64c8a698-298c-ea11-94bd-0050568d7800_Nathan-Bond_PhD-thesis_Seeking-the-state-from-the-margins.pdf "Seeking the state from the margins: From Tidung Lands to borderlands in Borneo"]. School of Social and Political Sciences. The University of Melbourne. Retrieved 19 January 2025</ref> Tausug traders began settling in Tarakan. However, things began to complicate after the Tidungs made a political marriage with Bulungan, placing the Tidungs also under the [[Sultanate of Bulungan]].<ref name="auto3">{{Cite web |title=Bulungan Sultanate Museum |url=https://geotourism.guide/tourpoints/indonesia/kalimantan-timur/kabupaten-bulungan-2/culture/bulungan-sultanate-museum/ |access-date=13 February 2022 |website=Geotourism-guide}}</ref>
In 1746, [[Azim ud-Din I of Sulu|Sultan Azim ud-Din I]], with Spanish assistance, carried out punitive expeditions around the [[Sebuku River|Sebuku]] region against the [[Tidung people|Tidungs]] to reconsolidate his power in Borneo. By April 1747, the expeditions were declared a success and the chief of [[Tarakan]] declared his allegiance to Sulu. After the Sultan returned to Sulu, he brought back 50 captives who were previously under the hands of the Tidung and among them was a friar, while others were Tidung chiefs. Two of the Tidung chiefs were left in Jolo while the rest were brought to Zamboanga.<ref name=":1">Bond, Natan (December 2020). [https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/256433/64c8a698-298c-ea11-94bd-0050568d7800_Nathan-Bond_PhD-thesis_Seeking-the-state-from-the-margins.pdf "Seeking the state from the margins: From Tidung Lands to borderlands in Borneo"]. School of Social and Political Sciences. The University of Melbourne. Retrieved 19 January 2025</ref> Tausug traders began settling in Tarakan. However, things began to complicate after the Tidungs made a political marriage with Bulungan, placing the Tidungs also under the [[Sultanate of Bulungan]].<ref name="auto3">{{Cite web |title=Bulungan Sultanate Museum |url=https://geotourism.guide/tourpoints/indonesia/kalimantan-timur/kabupaten-bulungan-2/culture/bulungan-sultanate-museum/ |access-date=13 February 2022 |website=Geotourism-guide}}</ref>


In 1789, amidst the civil war in [[Sultanate of Berau|Berau]], Sultan Azim ud-Din II raided Berau and Tarakan, which led to the de facto independence of Bulungan from Berau by the 18th-19th century. Sulu became the dominant power in the region and Bulungan was placed under the sphere of influence of the former. Tausug vessels began arriving in the region at a large scale to conduct trade. The status of Bulungan as a subject of Sulu however would later change after they stopped paying tribute to Sulu in 1855. This would later become official after the British annexation of North Borneo and the Dutch annexation of Bulungan in 1878.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Sellato |first=Bernard |date=2001 |title=Tribes and States in Northern East Borneo |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep02177.7.pdf |journal=Center for International Forestry Research |pages=15–41 |jstor=resrep02177.7 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kuliangga |first=Mos |title=Bulungan |url=https://www.academia.edu/3642422 |access-date=13 February 2022 |website=Academia.edu}}</ref>
In 1789, amidst the civil war in [[Sultanate of Berau|Berau]], Sultan Azim ud-Din II raided Berau and Tarakan, which led to the de facto independence of Bulungan from Berau by the 18th-19th century. Sulu became the dominant power in the region and Bulungan was placed under the sphere of influence of the former. Tausug vessels began arriving in the region at a large scale to conduct trade. The status of Bulungan as a subject of Sulu however would later change after they stopped paying tribute to Sulu in 1855. This would later become official after the British annexation of North Borneo and the Dutch annexation of Bulungan in 1878.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4">{{Cite journal |last=Sellato |first=Bernard |date=2001 |title=Tribes and States in Northern East Borneo |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep02177.7.pdf |journal=Center for International Forestry Research |pages=15–41 |jstor=resrep02177.7 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kuliangga |first=Mos |title=Bulungan |url=https://www.academia.edu/3642422 |access-date=13 February 2022 |website=Academia.edu}}</ref>
Whilst claims have been made by descendants of the Sulu that they owned or inherited ownership of North Borneo, no evidence has been presented to support such claims till today. There continues to be a general dislike for the Sulu and their heritage in Sabah for anything to do with the Sulu Sultanate who raided, kidnapped and sold into slavery thousands of natives of North Borneo (Sabah) for hundreds of years.


===Spanish and British annexations===
===Spanish and British annexations===
Line 136: Line 143:
By 1849, the areas gained from Brunei had been effectively controlled by the [[Sultanate of Bulungan]] in Kalimantan, reducing the boundary of Sulu to a cape named Batu Tinagat and the [[Tawau|Tawau River]].<ref name="icj638">{{Harvnb|United Nations Publications|2002|p=638}}</ref>
By 1849, the areas gained from Brunei had been effectively controlled by the [[Sultanate of Bulungan]] in Kalimantan, reducing the boundary of Sulu to a cape named Batu Tinagat and the [[Tawau|Tawau River]].<ref name="icj638">{{Harvnb|United Nations Publications|2002|p=638}}</ref>


[[File:Sultan Jamalul Azam (1879 photo).jpg|thumb|150px|1879 photo of Sultan [[Jamal ul-Azam]], Sultan of Sulu from 1862 to 1881]]
In 1848 and 1851, the Spanish launched [[Spanish expedition to Balanguingui|attacks on Balanguingui]] and Jolo respectively. A peace treaty was signed on 30 April 1851{{refn|see text of treaty (in Spanish),<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l0gMAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA120 |title=Colección de los tratados, convenios y documentos internacionales celebrados por nuestros gobiernos con los estados extranjeros desde el reinado de Doña Isabel II. hasta nuestros días. Acompañados de notas histórico-críticas sobre su negociación y cumplimiento y cotejados con los textos originales... |year=1893 |pages=120–123 |language=es|author1=Spain}}</ref>}} in which the sultan could only regain the capital if Sulu and its dependencies became a part of the Philippine Islands under the sovereignty of Spain. There were different understandings of this treaty; although the Spanish interpreted it as the sultan accepting Spanish sovereignty over Sulu and Tawi-Tawi, but the sultan took it as a friendly treaty amongst equals. These areas were only partially controlled by the Spanish, and their power was limited to military stations and garrisons and pockets of civilian settlements. This lasted until they had to abandon the region as a consequence of their defeat in the [[Spanish–American War]]. On 22 January 1878, an agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and British commercial syndicate of [[Alfred Dent]] and [[Gustav Overbeck|Baron von Overbeck]], which stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used) to the British in return for payment of five thousand Malayan dollars per year.<ref>{{cite book |author=Ooi |first=Keat Gin |author-link=Keat Gin Ooi |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC&pg=PA1163 |title=Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor |date=2004 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-57607-770-2 |pages=1163–}}</ref><ref name="Justice2003">{{cite book|author=International Court of Justice|title=Summaries of Judgments, Advisory Opinions, and Orders of the International Court of Justice, 1997–2002|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QhIhqVaIpawC&pg=PA205|year=2003|publisher=United Nations Publications|isbn=978-92-1-133541-5|pages=205–268}}{{Dead link|date=October 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
 
In 1848 and 1851, the Spanish launched [[Spanish expedition to Balanguingui|attacks on Balanguingui]] and Jolo respectively. A peace treaty was signed on 30 April 1851{{refn|see text of treaty (in Spanish),<ref>{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l0gMAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA120 |title=Colección de los tratados, convenios y documentos internacionales celebrados por nuestros gobiernos con los estados extranjeros desde el reinado de Doña Isabel II. hasta nuestros días. Acompañados de notas histórico-críticas sobre su negociación y cumplimiento y cotejados con los textos originales... |year=1893 |pages=120–123 |language=es|author1=Spain}}</ref>}} in which the sultan could only regain the capital if Sulu and its dependencies became a part of the Philippine Islands under the sovereignty of Spain. There were different understandings of this treaty; although the Spanish interpreted it as the sultan accepting Spanish sovereignty over Sulu and Tawi-Tawi, but the sultan took it as a friendly treaty amongst equals. These areas were only partially controlled by the Spanish, and their power was limited to military stations and garrisons and pockets of civilian settlements. This lasted until they had to abandon the region as a consequence of their defeat in the [[Spanish–American War]]. On 22 January 1878, an agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and British commercial syndicate of ([[Alfred Dent]] and [[Baron von Overbeck|Baron de Overbeck]]), which stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used) to the British in return for payment of five thousand Malayan dollars per year.<ref>{{cite book |author=Ooi |first=Keat Gin |author-link=Keat Gin Ooi |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QKgraWbb7yoC&pg=PA1163 |title=Southeast Asia: A Historical Encyclopedia, from Angkor Wat to East Timor |date=2004 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-57607-770-2 |pages=1163–}}</ref><ref name="Justice2003">{{cite book|author=International Court of Justice|title=Summaries of Judgments, Advisory Opinions, and Orders of the International Court of Justice, 1997–2002|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QhIhqVaIpawC&pg=PA205|year=2003|publisher=United Nations Publications|isbn=978-92-1-133541-5|pages=205–268}}{{Dead link|date=October 2023 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>


{{col-begin}}
{{col-begin}}
Line 160: Line 165:


===Decline===
===Decline===
{{main|Moro Rebellion|Battle of Bayan|First Battle of Bud Dajo|Second Battle of Bud Dajo|Battle of Bud Bagsak|Kiram-Bates Treaty}}
{{main|Kiram-Bates Treaty|Moro Rebellion}}
[[File:Datu Amil with Captain W.O. Reed.jpg|thumb|right|Datu Amil (sitting left), an influential leader of the Tausūgs in discussion with Captain W.O. Reed, US [[6th Cavalry Regiment]] during the American Moro Campaigns. Amil was later killed by the Americans which marking the start of the end of the Sulu Sultanate. Their region fell under the American rules.<ref>{{cite book|first1=Vic|last1=Hurley|first2=Christopher L.|last2=Harris|title=Swish of the Kris, the Story of the Moros, Authorized and Enhanced Edition|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qUkH7NgWlKUC&pg=PA228|date=1 October 2010|publisher=Cerberus Books|isbn=978-0-615-38242-5|pages=228–}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=James R.|last=Arnold|title=The Moro War: How America Battled a Muslim Insurgency in the Philippine Jungle, 1902-1913|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZgWnN4hyjoQC&pg=PA236|date=26 July 2011|publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing|isbn=978-1-60819-365-3|pages=236–}}</ref>]]
[[File:War Flag of Sulu Sultanate.svg|thumb|right|A [[war flag]] of the Sultanate of Sulu at the end of the 19th century]]
[[File:Daru Jambangan.jpg|thumb|right|[[Darul Jambangan]] (Palace of Flowers) in [[Maimbung, Sulu]] before it was destroyed by a typhoon in 1932. A campaign to faithfully re-establish it in Maimbung town has been ongoing since 1933. A very small replica of the palace was made in a nearby town in the 2010s, but it was noted that the replica does not mean that the campaign to reconstruct the palace in Maimbung has stopped as the replica does not manifest the true essence of a Sulu royal palace. In 2013, Maimbung was officially designated as the royal capital of the Sultanate of Sulu by the remaining members of the Sulu royal family. Almost all Sulu royals who have died since the 19th century up to the present have been buried around the palace grounds.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/510823/before-his-death-kiram-iii-tells-family-to-continue-fight-to-re-possess-sabah |title=Before his death, Kiram III tells family to continue fight to re-possess Sabah &#124; Inquirer News|date=20 October 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.manilatimes.net/sulu-sultan-dies-from-kidney-failure/219719/ |title=Sulu Sultan dies from kidney failure|website=[[The Manila Times]] | date=2015-09-20}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/world/asia/esmail-kiram-ii-self-proclaimed-sultan-of-sulu-dies-at-75.html |title=Esmail Kiram II, Self-Proclaimed Sultan of Sulu, Dies at 75| newspaper=The New York Times| date=2015-09-21| last1=Whaley| first1=Floyd}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.rappler.com/nation/41779-sulu-sultan-jamalul-kiram-iii-dies |title=Sulu Sultan Jamalul Kiram III dies| date=20 October 2013}}</ref>]]
Following the defeat of the [[Moro Rebellion]], the Sultanate of Sulu's existence effectively ceased on 22 March 1915, when American commanders demanded Sultan [[Jamalul Kiram II]] signed an agreement called the Carpenter Agreement. By this agreement, the sultan relinquished all sovereignty over territory then under control of the United States, retaining only his religious authority as head of Islam in Sulu.<ref name="carpenter"/><ref name=":0">{{cite web |last=Beyer|first=Otley|title=Memorandum Agreement between the Governor-General of the Philippine Islands and the Sultan of Sulu |url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1946/12/08/brief-memorandum-on-the-government-of-the-sultanate-of-sulu-and-powers-of-the-sultan-during-the-19th-century/ |date=22 March 1915 |work=Official Gazette| publisher=The Government of the Philippines}}</ref>
The sultanate's political power was relinquished in March 1915 after American commanders demanded Sultan Jamalul Kiram II signed an agreement called the "Carpenter Agreement". By this agreement, the sultan relinquished all political power over territory within the Philippines (except for certain specific land granted to Sultan Jamalul Kiram II and his heirs), with the religious authority as head of Islam in Sulu.<ref name="carpenter"/><ref>{{cite web |last=Beyer|first=Otley|title=Memorandum Agreement between the Governor-General of the Philippine Islands and the Sultan of Sulu |url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1946/12/08/brief-memorandum-on-the-government-of-the-sultanate-of-sulu-and-powers-of-the-sultan-during-the-19th-century/ |date=22 March 1915 |work=Official Gazette| publisher=The Government of the Philippines}}</ref>


==Legacy==
====North Borneo dispute====
===Status within the Philippines===
In 1962, the Philippine government under the administration of President [[Diosdado Macapagal]] officially recognized the continued existence of the Sultanate of Sulu.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1950/04/28/philippine-claim-to-north-borneo-vol-i-concurrent-resolution-expressing-the-sense-of-the-philippines-that-north-borneo-belongs-to-the-heirs-of-the-sultan-of-sulu-and-to-the-ultimate-sovereignty-of/|title=Concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Philippines that North Borneo belongs to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu and to the ultimate sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines, and authorizing the President to conduct negotiations for the restoration of such ownership and sovereign jurisdiction over said territory|work=Official Gazette|publisher=Government of the Philippines|date=28 April 1950|access-date=2 October 2016}}</ref> It has been asserted that Macapagal was a cousin of the Sulu sultan due to his royal descent tracing to [[Lakandula]] of [[Tondo (historical polity)|Tondo]],<ref name=macapagal>{{Cite web|url=http://www.filipinogenealogy.com/2019/06/gloria-macapagal-arroyos-royal-descent.html|title=Gloria Macapagal Arroyo's Royal Descent and the Value of Genealogical Provenance|first=Filipino|last=Genealogist}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=February 2024}}<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Santiago |first=Luciano P. R. |date=1990 |title=The Houses of Lakandula, Matandá and Solimán (1571–1898): Genealogy and Group Identity |journal=Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society |volume=18 |issue=1 |pages=39–73 |jstor=29791998}}</ref><ref>Blood Relationship between Cecile Licad and Gloria Macapagal Arroyo and their Bartolo roots by Louie Aldrin Lacson Bartolo</ref> Lakandula was the uncle of the Muslim king of Manila, Rajah Sulayman,<ref name=macapagal/> and they had a grandmother from Sulu in the person of the Tausug princess, Laila Mechanai, wife of [[Sultan Bolkiah]] of Brunei and ancestor of [[Rajah Matanda]] and [[Rajah Sulayman]] of [[Rajahnate of Maynila|Manila]].<ref name=macapagal/> On 24 May 1974, the reign of Sultan [[Mohammed Mahakuttah Abdullah Kiram|Mohammed Mahakuttah Kiram]] began and lasted until 1986. He was the last officially recognized Sulu sultan in the Philippines, having been recognized by [[President of the Philippines|President]] [[Ferdinand Marcos]].
 
====Pretenders====
After the death of Mahakuttah A. Kiram, the Philippine national government did not formally recognise a new sultan. Mahakutta's crown prince Muedzul Lail Kiram, the heir to the throne according to the line of succession as recognised by the Philippine governments from 1915 to 1986, was 20 years old upon his father's death.<ref name="Backo">{{cite book |last1=Backo |first1=Aleksandar |title=Sultanate of Sulu: Notes from the Past and Present Times |date=2015 |location=Belgrade, Serbia |page=10 |url=https://porodicnoporeklo.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/aleksandar-backo-sultanate-of-sulu.pdf |access-date=10 November 2019}}</ref> Due to his young age, he failed to claim the throne in a time of political instability in the Philippines that led to the [[People Power Revolution|peaceful revolution and subsequent removal of President Marcos]]. The gap in the sultanate leadership was filled by claimants of rival branches. Therefore, the succeeding claimants to the Sultanship were not crowned with the support of the Philippine government nor received formal recognition from the national government as their predecessors had until 1974, when [[Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram]] was formally recognised as the legitimate successor as the 35th sultan of Sulu by Memorandum Order 427, signed by Philippine President [[Ferdinand Marcos]].<ref name="memo order 427"/><ref name=Fabuan>{{cite web|last=Fabunan|first=Sara Susanne D.|title=Sabah intrusion foiled|url=http://manilastandardtoday.com/2013/02/15/sabah-intrusion-foiled/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130217044144/http://manilastandardtoday.com/2013/02/15/sabah-intrusion-foiled/|archive-date=2013-02-17|work=Manila Standard Today|access-date=24 February 2013}}</ref>
The then-Acting Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines officially further recognized the sovereignty of the Sultanate of Sulu over North Borneo (now [[Sabah]]), clarifying that "for the last two hundred years or more the title of sovereignty and dominion over the Territory of North Borneo has been vested in the Sultanate of Sulu."<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/1962/04/25/philippine-claim-to-a-portion-of-north-borneo-acceptance-by-the-republic-of-the-philippines-of-the-cession-and-transfer-of-the-terriroty-of-north-borneo-by-his-highness-sultan-mohammad-esmail-kiram/ | title=Acceptance by the Republic of the Philippines of the cession and transfer of the terriroty of North Borneo by His Highness, Sultan Mohammad Esmail Kiram, Sultan of Sulu, acting with the consent and approval of the Ruma Bechara, in council assembled, to the Republic of the Philippines | date=1962-04-25 | website=www.officialgazette.gov.ph}}</ref>
 
===North Borneo dispute===
{{Main|North Borneo dispute}}
{{Main|North Borneo dispute}}
[[File:W.C.Cowie and A.Cook-SultanOfSulu.png|thumb|left|[[William Cowie (merchant)|W. C. Cowie]], managing director of [[North Borneo Chartered Company|BNBC]] with the sultan of Sulu.Bhagat Singh, a former policeman on Victoria Island in North Borneo stands behind as an aide to Cowie.]]
[[File:W.C.Cowie and A.Cook-SultanOfSulu.png|thumb|left|[[William Cowie (merchant)|W. C. Cowie]], managing director of [[North Borneo Chartered Company|BNBC]], with the Sultan of Sulu.]]
The dispute is based on a territorial claim by the [[Philippines]] since the era of [[President of the Philippines|President]] [[Diosdado Macapagal]] over much of the eastern part of Sabah in [[Malaysia]]. Sabah was known as [[North Borneo]] prior to the formation of the Malaysian federation in 1963. The Eastern Sabah territory was allegedly gifted by the Brunei Sultanate to the Sulu Sultanate due to Sulu intervention in the [[Brunei Civil War]]. However Brunei historian Leigh R. Wright has claimed that Sulu never really provided assistance during the civil war.<ref>{{cite journal|jstor=2052002|title=Historical Notes on the North Borneo Dispute|author=Leigh R. Wright|journal=The Journal of Asian Studies|year=1966|volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=471–484 |doi=10.2307/2052002|s2cid=154355668 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUYrBkIntLaw/1968/8.pdf|title=International Law and the Sabah Dispute: A Postscript|author=Geoffrey Marston|publisher=Australian International Law Journal|year=1967|access-date=14 May 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171110085509/http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AUYrBkIntLaw/1968/8.pdf|archive-date=10 November 2017|url-status=dead}}</ref> The Philippines, via the heritage of the Sultanate of Sulu, claim Sabah on the basis that Sabah was only leased to the [[North Borneo Chartered Company|British North Borneo Company]] with the sultanate's sovereignty never being relinquished. The dispute stems from the difference in the interpretation used on an agreement signed between Sultanate of Sulu and the British commercial syndicate (Alfred Dent and Baron von Overbeck) in 1878, which stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used) to the British chartered company in return for payment of 5,000 dollars per year. Malaysia views the dispute as a "non-issue", as it not only considers the agreement in 1878 as one of cession, but it also deems that the residents had exercised their act of self-determination when they joined to form the Malaysian federation in 1963.<ref>{{cite web|title=Sulu sultan's 'heirs' drop Sabah claim|url=http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/breakingnews/view/20080717-149023/Sulu-sultans-heirs-drop-Sabah-claim|access-date=26 October 2010|newspaper=[[Philippine Daily Inquirer]]|date=17 September 2008|first1=Ruben|last1=Sario|first2=Julie S.|last2=Alipala|first3=Ed|last3=General|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703014347/http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/breakingnews/view/20080717-149023/Sulu-sultans-heirs-drop-Sabah-claim|archive-date=3 July 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Aning|first=Jerome|title=Sabah legislature refuses to tackle RP claim|url=http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20090422-200829/Sabah-legislature-refuses-to-tackle-RP-claim|access-date=27 February 2013|newspaper=[[Philippine Daily Inquirer]]|date=23 April 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703015336/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20090422-200829/Sabah-legislature-refuses-to-tackle-RP-claim|archive-date=3 July 2013}}</ref> As reported by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the independence of North Borneo was brought about as the result of the expressed wish of the majority of the people of the territory as supported by the findings of the [[Cobbold Commission]].<ref name="World Court Digest?">{{citation|url=http://www.mpil.de/ww/en/pub/research/details/publications/institute/wcd.cfm?fuseaction_wcd=aktdat&aktdat=201010200400.cfm|title=II. Substantive International Law – Second Part, 1. Territory of States |publisher=Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law|year=2012|access-date=15 October 2012|archive-date=23 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130223023033/http://www.mpil.de/ww/en/pub/research/details/publications/institute/wcd.cfm?fuseaction_wcd=aktdat&aktdat=201010200400.cfm|url-status=dead}}</ref>
The North Borneo dispute or Sabah dispute is a territorial dispute between the [[Philippines]] and [[Malaysia]] over much of the eastern part of [[Sabah]] (known as [[North Borneo]] prior to the formation of the Malaysian federation in 1963), stemming from a difference in interpretation over the language used in the 1878 agreement signed between Sultanate of Sulu and [[Gustav Overbeck|Baron von Overbeck]]. The document stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used of the Malay term ''[[:wikt:pajakan|pajakkan]]'') to Overbeck's chartered company in return for payment of 5,000 dollars per year.


Moreover, a later 1903 Confirmation of Cession agreement between the sultan of Sulu and the British government, has provided reaffirmation regarding the understanding of the sultan of Sulu on the treaty in 1878, i.e. it is of the form of a cession.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.google.com/search?q=The+term+used+in+the+1903+confirmation+Beritish+Nurth+Burniuh,+meaning+literally+we+have+willingly+surrendered+to+the+Government+of+British+North+Borneo.+here+the+controversial+idiom+of+pajakan&tbm=bks&cshid=1596441598799440|title=The Contested Maritime and Territorial Boundaries of Malaysia: An International Law Perspective|last=Haller-Trost|first=R|publisher=Kluwer Law International|year=1998|isbn=9789041196521|location=University of Michigan|pages=155}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=R. Haller-Trost|title=The Contested Maritime and Territorial Boundaries of Malaysia: An International Law Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=65VuAAAAMAAJ|date=1 January 1998|publisher=Kluwer Law International|isbn=978-90-411-9652-1}}</ref> Throughout the British administration of North Borneo, the British government continued to make the annual "cession money" payment to the sultan and its heir and these payments were expressly shown in the receipts as "cession money".<ref name="Salonga cession money">{{cite news|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C2UpAQAAMAAJ|title=Philippine Claim to North Borneo, Volume 2|publisher=Bureau of Printing|date=1967|access-date=2 August 2020}}</ref> In a 1961 conference in London, a Philippine and British panel met to discuss the Philippine claim to North Borneo, the British informed the Congressman [[Jovito Salonga|Salonga]] that the wording of the receipts had not been challenged by the sultan or his heirs.<ref name="Salonga cession money"/> During a meeting of [[Maphilindo]] between the Philippine, Malayan and Indonesian governments in 1963, the Philippine government said the sultan of Sulu wanted the payment of 5,000 from the Malaysian government.<ref name="dreaming Sultan"/> The first [[Prime Minister of Malaysia|Malaysian Prime Minister]] at the time, [[Tunku Abdul Rahman]] said he would go back to [[Kuala Lumpur]] and get on the request.<ref name="dreaming Sultan"/> Since then, the Malaysian Embassy in the Philippines issues a cheque in the amount of [[Malaysian ringgit|RM]]5,300 (approx. [[Philippine pesos|₱]]77,000 or US$1,710) to the legal counsel of the heirs of the sultan of Sulu. Malaysia considers the settlement an annual "cession payment" for the disputed state, while the sultan's descendants consider it "rent".<ref name="inq-timeline">{{cite news|url=http://globalnation.inquirer.net/65303/what-went-before-sultan-of-sulus-9-principal-heirs|title=WHAT WENT BEFORE: Sultan of Sulu's 9 principal heirs|newspaper=[[Philippine Daily Inquirer]]|date=23 February 2013|access-date=23 February 2013}}</ref> These payments however have been stopped as of 2013 in light of the [[2013 Lahad Datu standoff|attempted invasion of Sabah]] since Malaysia viewed that as an act of violation of the 1903 Confirmation of Cession agreement and its earlier 1878 agreement.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2020/07/610835/malaysia-stopped-paying-cession-money-sulu-sultanate-2013|title=Malaysia stopped paying cession money to Sulu Sultanate in 2013|newspaper=[[New Straits Times]]|date=23 July 2020|access-date=11 August 2020}}</ref>
The Philippines, presenting itself as the [[successor state]] to the Sultanate of Sulu, claim Sabah on the basis that Sabah was only leased to the [[North Borneo Chartered Company|British North Borneo Company]], with the sultanate's sovereignty never being relinquished, the Eastern Sabah territory having been allegedly gifted by the Brunei Sultanate to the Sulu Sultanate due to Sulu intervention in the [[Brunei Civil War]]. This was made official in a 1968 Filipino act declaring the territory of Sabah under their "dominion and sovereignty"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1968/ra_5446_1968.html|title=An Act to Amend Section One of Republic Act Numbered Thirty Hundred and forty-six, Entitled 'An Act to Define the Baselines of the Territorial Sea of the Philippines'|access-date=17 February 2013}}</ref> and later confirmed by a 2011 decision by the [[Supreme Court of the Philippines]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html|title=G.R No. 187167|publisher=[[Supreme Court of the Philippines]]|date=16 July 2011|access-date=17 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112231140/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html|archive-date=12 January 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref>


Republic Act 5446 in the Philippines, which took effect on 18 September 1968, regards Sabah as a territory "over which the Republic of the Philippines has acquired dominion and sovereignty".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1968/ra_5446_1968.html|title=An Act to Amend Section One of Republic Act Numbered Thirty Hundred and forty-six, Entitled 'An Act to Define the Baselines of the Territorial Sea of the Philippines'|access-date=17 February 2013}}</ref> On 16 July 2011, the [[Supreme Court of the Philippines]] ruled that the Philippine claim over Sabah is retained and may be pursued in the future.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html|title=G.R No. 187167|publisher=[[Supreme Court of the Philippines]]|date=16 July 2011|access-date=17 February 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112231140/http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2011/august2011/187167.html|archive-date=12 January 2016|url-status=dead}}</ref> {{as of|2018|5|10}}, Malaysia maintains that their Sabah claim is a non-issue and non-negotiable, thereby rejecting any calls from the Philippines to resolve the matter in the International Court of Justice. Sabah authorities sees the claim made by the Philippines' Moro leader Nur Misuari to take Sabah to International Court of Justice as a non-issue and thus dismissed the claim.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=%2f2008%2f5%2f29%2fnation%2f21389432&sec=nation|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227044338/http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=%2f2008%2f5%2f29%2fnation%2f21389432&sec=nation|archive-date=2014-02-27|title=Call for ICJ arbitration dismissed|work=The Star|date=29 May 2008|access-date=24 February 2013}}</ref>
Malaysia views the dispute as a "non-issue", dismissing calls to resolve the matter in the [[International Court of Justice]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=%2f2008%2f5%2f29%2fnation%2f21389432&sec=nation|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140227044338/http://www.thestar.com.my/story.aspx/?file=%2f2008%2f5%2f29%2fnation%2f21389432&sec=nation|archive-date=2014-02-27|title=Call for ICJ arbitration dismissed|work=The Star|date=29 May 2008|access-date=24 February 2013}}</ref> as it not only considers the agreement in 1878 as one of cession, but it also deems that the residents had exercised their act of self-determination when they joined to form the Malaysian federation in 1963.<ref>{{cite web|title=Sulu sultan's 'heirs' drop Sabah claim|url=http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/breakingnews/view/20080717-149023/Sulu-sultans-heirs-drop-Sabah-claim|access-date=26 October 2010|newspaper=[[Philippine Daily Inquirer]]|date=17 September 2008|first1=Ruben|last1=Sario|first2=Julie S.|last2=Alipala|first3=Ed|last3=General|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703014347/http://globalnation.inquirer.net/news/breakingnews/view/20080717-149023/Sulu-sultans-heirs-drop-Sabah-claim|archive-date=3 July 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Aning|first=Jerome|title=Sabah legislature refuses to tackle RP claim|url=http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20090422-200829/Sabah-legislature-refuses-to-tackle-RP-claim|access-date=27 February 2013|newspaper=[[Philippine Daily Inquirer]]|date=23 April 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130703015336/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view/20090422-200829/Sabah-legislature-refuses-to-tackle-RP-claim|archive-date=3 July 2013}}</ref> As reported by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the independence of North Borneo was brought about as the result of the expressed wish of the majority of the people of the territory as supported by the findings of the [[Cobbold Commission]].<ref name = "World Court Digest?">
{{citation|url=http://www.mpil.de/ww/en/pub/research/details/publications/institute/wcd.cfm?fuseaction_wcd=aktdat&aktdat=201010200400.cfm|title=II. Substantive International Law – Second Part,;1.TERRITORY OF STATES|publisher=Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law|year=2012|accessdate=15 October 2012}}</ref>


In February 2022, an international court ruled that Malaysia had violated a treaty signed in 1878 of annual cession payment and would have to pay at least US$14.92 billion (RM62.59 billion) to the descendants of the Sulu sultan, which Malaysia ceased payment in 2013 as it deemed that the Sulu counterpart had first violated the treaty through the [[2013 Lahad Datu standoff|2013 Sabah incursion]]. The award was reportedly issued in an arbitration court in Paris, France by Spanish arbitrator [[Gonzalo Stampa]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Zulkaflee |first=Ikhwan |title=International Court Ruled That Malaysia Must Pay RM62 Billion To Sulu Sultan's Descendents |url=https://www.therakyatpost.com/news/2022/03/01/international-court-ruled-that-malaysia-must-pay-rm62-billion-to-sulu-sultans-descendents/ |access-date=2022-03-18 |website=TRP |date=March 2022 |language=en-US}}</ref> In March 2022, Malaysia filed an application to annul the final award over claims by Sulu sultan’s heirs since the appointment of Stampa had itself been annulled by Madrid High Court in June 2021, rendering any decisions by him to be invalid including the 2022 award.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Malaysia files application to annul final award over claims by Sulu sultan's heirs |url=https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2022/03/18/malaysia-files-application-to-annul-final-award-over-claims-by-sulu-sultans-heirs |access-date=2022-03-18 |website=The Star |date=18 March 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Lawyers for the heirs indicated that they will seek the award’s recognition and execution, citing a 1958 U.N. Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.laprensalatina.com/an-old-sultanate-oil-and-14-9-million-ruling-against-malaysia/|title=An old sultanate, oil and $14.9 million ruling against Malaysia|newspaper=La Prensa Latina|date=March 17, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english|title=United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958)|website=newyorkconvention.org|accessdate=March 18, 2022}}</ref> In July 2022, court bailiffs in Luxembourg served Petronas Azerbaijan (Shah Denis) and Petronas South Caucus with a "saiseie-arret," or a size order or behalf of descendants of the Sulu sultan. Petronas said it would defend its legal position.<ref>{{Cite news |date=2022-07-12 |title=Petronas subsidiaries seized as lawyers press $15bn claim on Malaysia |work=Financial Times |url=https://www.ft.com/content/659437c7-dcc5-4756-821d-12d56d569732 |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221211/https://www.ft.com/content/659437c7-dcc5-4756-821d-12d56d569732 |archive-date=11 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |access-date=2022-07-14}}</ref>
Moreover, a later 1903 Confirmation of Cession agreement between the sultan of Sulu and the British governmen provided reaffirmation regarding the understanding of the sultan of Sulu on the treaty in 1878, i.e. it is of the form of a cession.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://www.google.com/search?q=The+term+used+in+the+1903+confirmation+Beritish+Nurth+Burniuh,+meaning+literally+we+have+willingly+surrendered+to+the+Government+of+British+North+Borneo.+here+the+controversial+idiom+of+pajakan&tbm=bks&cshid=1596441598799440|title=The Contested Maritime and Territorial Boundaries of Malaysia: An International Law Perspective|last=Haller-Trost|first=R|publisher=Kluwer Law International|year=1998|isbn=9789041196521|location=University of Michigan|pages=155}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=R. Haller-Trost|title=The Contested Maritime and Territorial Boundaries of Malaysia: An International Law Perspective|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=65VuAAAAMAAJ|date=1 January 1998|publisher=Kluwer Law International|isbn=978-90-411-9652-1}}</ref> Every year until 2013, the Malaysian Embassy in the Philippines issued a cheque in the amount of [[Malaysian ringgit|RM]]5,300 (approx. [[Philippine pesos|₱]]77,000 or US$1,710) to the legal counsel of the heirs of the sultan of Sulu. Malaysia considered the settlement an annual "cession payment" for the disputed state, while the sultan's descendants considered it "rent".<ref name="inq-timeline">{{cite news|url=http://globalnation.inquirer.net/65303/what-went-before-sultan-of-sulus-9-principal-heirs|title=WHAT WENT BEFORE: Sultan of Sulu's 9 principal heirs|newspaper=[[Philippine Daily Inquirer]]|date=23 February 2013|access-date=23 February 2013}}</ref>


In June 2023, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the Malaysian Government's appeal against the French arbitration court's 2022 decision to award US$15 billion to the claimants to the Sultanate of Sulu. The Court of Appeal also ruled that Stampa and the arbitration tribunal did not have jurisdiction over the case. In addition, the Court of Appeal annulled the US$15.9 billion award. The decision was welcomed by Malaysian law minister Datuk Seri [[Azalina Othman]].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Vanar |first1=Muguntan |last2=Monihuldin |first2=Mahadhir |title=Sulu claimants' award thrown out by Paris Appeals Court |url=https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/06/07/sulu-claimants-award-thrown-out-by-paris-appeals-court? |access-date=8 June 2023 |work=[[The Star (Malaysia)|The Star]] |date=7 June 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608051730/https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/06/07/sulu-claimants-award-thrown-out-by-paris-appeals-court|archive-date=8 June 2023|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="SCMP 7 Jun 2023">{{cite news |last1=Sipalan |first1=Joseph |title=Malaysia hails 'decisive victory' over Sulu sultan's heirs after French court ruling |url=https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3223215/malaysia-hails-decisive-victory-over-sulu-sultans-heirs-after-french-court-ruling|access-date=8 June 2023 |work=[[South China Morning Post]] |date=7 June 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230607073733/https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3223215/malaysia-hails-decisive-victory-over-sulu-sultans-heirs-after-french-court-ruling|archive-date=7 June 2023|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Malaysia hails 'victory' in row with Sulu sultan's Filipino heirs |url=https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/7/malaysia-wins-decisive-victory-in-row-with-sulu-sultans-heirs |access-date=8 June 2023 |work=[[Al Jazeera English|Al Jazeera]] |date=7 June 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608190616/https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/7/malaysia-wins-decisive-victory-in-row-with-sulu-sultans-heirs|archive-date=8 June 2023|url-status=live}}</ref> Stampa also faces legal proceedings in Spain for ignoring the decisions of earlier Spanish courts. However, Stampa's award remains enforceable outside of France due to a United Nations treaty on international arbitration. The Sulu claimants have also filed claims to seize Malaysian assets in the Netherlands and Luxembourg.<ref name="SCMP 7 Jun 2023" />
The annual payments to the heirs of the sultan were stopped after the [[2013 Lahad Datu standoff]], in which a group of armed individuals sent by [[Jamalul Kiram III]], one of the claimants to the Sulu throne, arrived by boat in [[Lahad Datu]], Sabah, from the southern Philippines, in an attempt to assert their territorial claim to North Borneo.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://globalnation.inquirer.net/64577/heirs-of-sultan-of-sulu-pursue-sabah-claim-on-their-own|title=Heirs of Sultan of Sulu pursue Sabah claim on their own|newspaper=Philippine Daily Inquirer|date=16 February 2013|access-date=20 February 2013}}</ref> During the ensuing standoff, 56 of Jamalul's supporters were killed, along with 6 civilians and 10 Malaysian soldiers, leading to public pressure towards the Malaysian government to cancel the payments. Seven Filipino men involved in the incident were eventually given the death penalty.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Azalina justifies death sentence for seven Sulu 'terrorists'; says penalty for local Lahad Datu 'traitors' to be known after French court ruling in Nov |url=https://news.nestia.com/detail/Azalina-justifies-death-sentence-for-seven-Sulu-%E2%80%98terrorists%E2%80%99%3B-says-penalty-for-local-Lahad-Datu-%E2%80%98traitors%E2%80%99-to-be-known-after-French-court-ruling-in-Nov/12945789 }}</ref> Malaysia considered that the standoff violated the 1878 treaty.<ref name="SultanObjective">{{cite news|author=Mike Frialde|url=http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2013/02/23/912045/sultanate-sulu-wants-sabah-returned-phl|title=Sultanate of Sulu wants Sabah returned to Phl|date=23 February 2013|newspaper=The Philippine Star|access-date=24 February 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2020/07/610835/malaysia-stopped-paying-cession-money-sulu-sultanate-2013|title=Malaysia stopped paying cession money to Sulu Sultanate in 2013|newspaper=[[New Straits Times]]|date=23 July 2020|access-date=11 August 2020}}</ref>


On 27 June 2023, a Dutch court of appeal dismissed a bid by the claimants to the Sultanate to enforce the US$15 billion arbitration award against the Malaysian Government. While the Malaysian Government welcomed the court's ruling, the Sulu heirs' lawyer [[Paul Cohen (lawyer)|Paul Cohen]] expressed disappointment.<ref>{{cite news |last1=van den Berg |first1=Stephanie |last2=Latiff |first2=Rosanna |title=Dutch court rules sultan's heirs cannot seize Malaysian assets |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/dutch-court-rules-sultan-heirs-cannot-seize-malaysian-assets-2023-06-27/ |access-date=28 June 2023 |work=[[Reuters]] |date=27 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230627090800/https://www.reuters.com/world/dutch-court-rules-sultan-heirs-cannot-seize-malaysian-assets-2023-06-27/ |archive-date=27 June 2023|url-status=live}}</ref>  On 9 November 2023, the Paris Court of Appeal dismissed legal attempts by the Sultanate's claimants to seize Malaysian diplomatic properties in Paris.<ref>{{cite news |title=Sulu case: French court ends so-called heirs' claims over Malaysia's diplomatic assets, says Azalina |url=https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/11/09/sulu-case-malaysia-ends-purported-sulu-heirs039-claims-on-m039sian-assets-in-france-says-azalina |access-date=14 November 2023 |work=[[The Star (Malaysia)|The Star]] |date=9 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231110031016/https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/11/09/sulu-case-malaysia-ends-purported-sulu-heirs039-claims-on-m039sian-assets-in-france-says-azalina |archive-date=10 November 2023}}</ref> On 10 November, the Madrid Court filed criminal charges against Stampa over his role in handing the US$14.92 billion arbitration award to the eight Sulu claimants.<ref>{{cite news |title=Sulu case: Spanish arbitrator Stampa to face criminal charges in Madrid on Dec 11 - Azalina |url=https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2023/11/976916/sulu-case-spanish-arbitrator-stampa-face-criminal-charges-madrid |access-date=14 November 2023 |work=[[New Straits Times]] |agency=[[Bernama]] |date=10 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231112011654/https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2023/11/976916/sulu-case-spanish-arbitrator-stampa-face-criminal-charges-madrid |archive-date=12 November 2023}}</ref> On 5 January 2024, Stampa was convicted for contempt of court.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Castro2024-01-19T13:14:00+00:00 |first=Bianca |title=Arbitrator in $14.9bn case jailed following intervention by Malaysia |url=https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/arbitrator-in-149bn-case-jailed-following-intervention-by-malaysia/5118364.article |access-date=2024-01-29 |website=Law Gazette |language=en}}</ref> He was sentenced to six months in prison and banned from acting as an arbitrator for one year for “knowingly disobeying rulings and orders from the Madrid High Court of Justice”.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Arbitrator's Guilty Verdict Puts UK Funder's Investment at Risk |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/arbitrators-guilty-verdict-puts-uk-funders-investment-at-risk |access-date=2024-01-29 |website=news.bloomberglaw.com |language=en}}</ref> According to Law360, the Spanish courts’ decision to move ahead with criminal proceedings against Stampa marked a significant “victory for the Malaysian government”.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Arbitrator Who Issued $14.9B Award Against Malaysia Indicted - Law360 |url=https://www.law360.com/articles/1765396/arbitrator-who-issued-14-9b-award-against-malaysia-indicted |access-date=2024-01-29 |website=www.law360.com |language=en}}</ref>
In February 2022, after [[List of sultans of Sulu|relatives]] of the last Sultan sued the Malaysian government for violation of the treaty that had established the annual cession payment, a [[Paris]] arbitration court awarded at least US$14.92 billion (RM62.59 billion) to the descendants of the Sulu sultan, in what became known as the [[Malaysia Sulu case]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Zulkaflee |first=Ikhwan |title=International Court Ruled That Malaysia Must Pay RM62 Billion To Sulu Sultan's Descendents |url=https://www.therakyatpost.com/news/2022/03/01/international-court-ruled-that-malaysia-must-pay-rm62-billion-to-sulu-sultans-descendents/ |access-date=2022-03-18 |website=TRP |date=March 2022 |language=en-US}}</ref> The claims were subsequently litigated in the Spanish, French, and Dutch court systems.<ref name="Fresh">{{cite news |last1=Beattie |first1=Elizabeth |title=Fresh from 'Sulu case' win, Malaysia's law minister turns to domestic reforms |url=https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2023/07/07/asia-pacific/crime-legal-asia-pacific/malaysia-law-minister-sulu-case/ |access-date=15 December 2023 |work=The Japan Times |date=7 July 2023 |language=en}}</ref> Malaysia obtained a final victory in the French [[Court of Cassation (France)|Court of Cassation]] on 6 November 2024, dismissing the claims of the Sulu heirs.<ref name="reuters.com">{{cite news|last1=Hummel|first1=Tassilo|last2=Azhar|first2=Danial|last3=Williams|first3=Alison|last4=Petty|first4=Martin|date=7 November 2024|access-date=20 January 2025|title=Late sultan's heirs fail in bid to challenge French ruling on Malaysia dispute|url=https://www.reuters.com/world/sultans-heirs-fail-with-bid-challenge-french-ruling-dispute-with-malaysia-2024-11-06/|work=Reuters}}</ref>
 
On May 17, 2024 the Madrid Court of Appeal upheld the contempt of court conviction and sentence against Stampa, upholding his six-month prison sentence, and a one-year ban from practicing as an arbitrator.<ref>{{cite web |title=MADRID COURT OF APPEAL CONFIRMS SULU ARBITRATOR GONZALO STAMPA'S CONVICTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT |url=https://www.kln.gov.my/web/guest/-/madrid-court-of-appeal-confirms-sulu-arbitrator-gonzalo-stampa-s-conviction-for-contempt-of-cou-3?inheritRedirect=true&redirect=%2Fweb%2Fguest%2Fpress-releases |publisher=[[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Malaysia)|Ministry of Foreign Affairs Malaysia]] |access-date=28 May 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240528030918/https://www.kln.gov.my/web/guest/-/madrid-court-of-appeal-confirms-sulu-arbitrator-gonzalo-stampa-s-conviction-for-contempt-of-cou-3 |archive-date=28 May 2024 |date=17 May 2024 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{Cite web |last=BERNAMA |title=Sulu Case: Madrid Court of Appeal upholds Stampa's conviction, sentence |url=https://thesun.my/local-news/sulu-case-madrid-court-of-appeal-upholds-stampa-s-conviction-sentence-BB12466373 |access-date=2024-06-27 |website=thesun.my |language=en-MY}}</ref>
 
The Madrid Court highlighted that the arbitrator's appointment was a judicial decision made before the arbitration process. Consequently, once the nullification of the appointment was confirmed, all subsequent arbitral proceedings stemming from that appointment were rendered invalid, as if they had never occurred.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=Decoding Arbitral Disputes: Spanish Judicial Oversight – Law360.com |url=https://www.law360.com/articles/1846683/decoding-arbitral-disputes-spanish-judicial-oversight |access-date=2024-06-27 |website=www.law360.com |language=en}}</ref>
 
Malaysian Minister Azalina Othman said, “In its judgment, the Madrid Court of Appeal confirms that Stampa knowingly and wilfully disobeyed the clear rulings and orders of the Madrid High Court of Justice resulting from the nullification of his appointment as arbitrator.<ref name="auto"/>
 
Later on May 30, 2024, Malaysian state-owned petroleum firm Petronas moved a Manhattan court to seek directions for litigation funding firm Therium and its parent company to turn over subpoenaed financial documents and communications.
 
Petronas’ Azerbaijani arm said it would sue the companies and their lawyers in Spain over losses from the seizure of assets in Luxembourg.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Petronas units in Luxembourg seized again |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/petronas-units-luxembourg-seized-again-15-bln-arbitration-dispute-2023-02-16/ |website=Reuters}}</ref>
 
Former Spanish Judge Josep Galvez – barrister at 4–5 Gray's Inn Square Chambers, which the lawyers of Sulu claimants [[Paul Cohen (lawyer)|Paul Cohen]] and [[Elisabeth Mason]] also associate with – said the Madrid Court’s ruling underscored the importance of rigorous compliance with procedural requirements and judicial orders under Spanish law, as failure to do so could invite severe penalties.<ref name=":0" /> “The conviction of Stampa serves as a lesson for international arbitration practitioners, emphasizing the paramount importance of adhering to judicial orders in Spain,” he wrote.
 
On 6 September 2024, the Dutch Supreme Court rejected an appeal by the Sulus to enforce the US$15 billion arbitration award against Malaysia.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Dutch Supreme Court refuses to enforce Sulu award |url=https://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/dutch-supreme-court-refuses-enforce-sulu-award#:~:text=The%20Dutch%20Supreme%20Court%20has,to%20the%20Sultan%20of%20Sulu. |access-date=2025-01-02 |website=globalarbitrationreview.com |language=en}}</ref> The ruling came as a continuation of previous decisions in Malaysia’s favor, such as those by the Hague Court of Appeal upholding Malaysia’s challenge against the award, and the Paris Court of Appeal annulling an attempt by the Sulu group to mortgage a Malaysian diplomatic building in Paris.<ref>{{Cite web |title=MSN |url=https://www.msn.com/en-my/news/national/govt-declares-sulu-case-over-after-final-dutch-court-ruling/ar-AA1q7kY3 |access-date=2025-01-02 |website=www.msn.com}}</ref>
 
On 3 October 2024, Malaysia's Federal Court upheld the death sentences of seven Filipino men involved in the 2013 Lahad Datu invasion, which had resulted in the deaths of nine Malaysian security personnel.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Federal Court Upholds Death Sentence For Seven Filipino Men In Lahad Datu 2013 Invasion |date=2 October 2024 |url=https://my.headtopics.com/news/federal-court-upholds-death-sentence-for-seven-filipino-men-59763764 }}</ref> The ruling was seen as a step toward ensuring justice and strengthening national security in Malaysia.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Azalina justifies death sentence for seven Sulu 'terrorists'; says penalty for local Lahad Datu 'traitors' to be known after French court ruling in Nov |url=https://news.nestia.com/detail/Azalina-justifies-death-sentence-for-seven-Sulu-%E2%80%98terrorists%E2%80%99%3B-says-penalty-for-local-Lahad-Datu-%E2%80%98traitors%E2%80%99-to-be-known-after-French-court-ruling-in-Nov/12945789 }}</ref>
 
On November 7, 2024, the French Court of Cassation{{snd}}the highest court in the French judicial system{{snd}}annulled a $15 billion arbitration ruling against Malaysia. This decision marked a significant legal victory for Malaysia and reinforced its sovereignty in a dispute with the self-proclaimed Sulu heirs.<ref name=trib>{{Cite web |date=2024-11-13 |title=Un Jugement historique inaugure une nouvelle ère de progrès pour les tribunaux européens |url=https://www.latribune.fr/supplement/la-tribune-now/un-jugement-historique-inaugure-une-nouvelle-ere-de-progres-pour-les-tribunaux-europeens-1011299.html |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=La Tribune |language=fr}}</ref> The ruling highlighted irregularities in the arbitration process led by [[Gonzalo Stampa]] and raised concerns about practices such as forum shopping and unregulated litigation funding in European courts.<ref>{{Cite web |title=French Supreme Court Rejects Enforcement of Jurisdictional Award |url=https://natlawreview.com/article/french-supreme-court-track-annul-us15-billion-award-against-malaysia#google_vignette |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=natlawreview.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Malaysia Wins $15B Arbitration Case Against Sulu Heirs |url=https://www.law360.com/articles/2257972/malaysia-wins-15b-arbitration-case-against-sulu-heirs |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=www.law360.com |language=en}}</ref>
 
The French court’s decision was deemed a significant “win” for Malaysia that effectively marked the end of the Sulu case by several publications, including Law.com and Law360.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Malaysia Wins $15B Arbitration Case Against Sulu Heirs - Law360 |url=https://www.law360.com/articles/2257972/malaysia-wins-15b-arbitration-case-against-sulu-heirs |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=www.law360.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=French High Court Rejects Sultanate 'Heirs' $15 Billion Claim Against Malaysia |url=https://www.law.com/international-edition/2024/11/11/french-high-court-rejects-sultanate-heirs-15-billion-claim-against-malaysia/?slreturn=20241219121833 |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=Law.com International |language=en}}</ref>  Keith Ellison, former vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee and Minnesota attorney general, pointed out that the case highlighted the enormous scope for “corruption,” irresponsible profiteering, and foreign influence operations to subvert arbitration proceedings”.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bensoussan |first=David |date=2024-10-01 |title=L'impasse politique de la France sera le plus grand cadeau pour Poutine à ce jour |url=https://42mag.fr/2024/10/limpasse-politique-de-la-france-sera-le-plus-grand-cadeau-pour-poutine-a-ce-jour/ |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=42mag.fr |language=fr-FR}}</ref>
 
In its verdict, the French court declared the arbitration clause in the case invalid because it appointed the long-defunct British Consul General in Brunei as arbitrator.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=VL |date=2025-04-14 |title=Pourquoi réformer le droit français sur l'arbitrage ? |url=https://vl-media.fr/pourquoi-reformer-le-droit-francais-sur-larbitrage/ |access-date=2025-05-21 |website=VL Média |language=fr-FR}}</ref> The decision also underscored the need for international arbitration agreements to be interpreted in accordance with the principles of good faith and utility, “without reference to the law of any State”.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dumont |first=Davide |date=2025-03-13 |title=Décision marquante annonçant la volonté audacieuse de Paris de renforcer l'avenir de l'arbitrage mondial |url=https://www.ibtimes.fr/decision-marquante-annoncant-la-volonte-audacieuse-de-paris-de-renforcer-lavenir-de-larbitrage-105238 |access-date=2025-05-21 |website=International Business Times |language=fr}}</ref> A number of international experts welcomed the observation, including University of Paris Cité Professor Caroline Kleiner who called it a major shift in arbitration law and hearing. In her review carried by Kluwer Law International, Keleiner said the decision would help French courts participate in the development of international law on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards per a universalist approach, rather than the trend of exceptionalism that is currently being pursued.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kleiner |first=Caroline |date=2025-02-25 |title=Towards the End of the ‘Sultan de Sulu’ Case in France: The Hidden Influence of the New York Convention on French Law on Enforcement of Arbitral Awards? |url=https://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2025/02/25/towards-the-end-of-the-sultan-de-sulu-case-in-france-the-hidden-influence-of-the-new-york-convention-on-french-law-on-enforcement-of-arbitral-awards/ |access-date=2025-05-21 |website=Kluwer Arbitration Blog |language=en-US}}</ref>  
 
Following Malaysia's legal victory in the French Court, [[Paul Cohen (lawyer)|Paul Cohen]] argued that the ruling allows the Sulu heirs to lease Sabah to other nations, such as China and the Philippines. He also filed a new $18 billion suit against Spain for allegedly denying justice.<ref name=":2" /> Cohen also suggested that accepting the French court's decision implies recognition of the Sulu Sultanate descendants' sovereignty over Sabah, which Malaysia disputes.<ref>{{Cite web |title='Heirs' now free to lease Sabah to China, Philippines, says lawyer |url=https://news.nestia.com/detail/'Heirs'-now-free-to-lease-Sabah-to-China,-Philippines,-says-lawyer/13044946 |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=news.nestia.com}}</ref> In response, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said dismissed Cohen's statements as baseless and reaffirmed Sabah’s status as part of Malaysia, citing historical and legal foundations such as the Cobbold Commission and the 1963 referendum.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Azalina to Sulu 'heirs': Go ahead and try 'leasing' Sabah to other countries |url=https://news.nestia.com/detail/Azalina-to-Sulu-'heirs':-Go-ahead-and-try-'leasing'-Sabah-to-other-countries/13048038 |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=news.nestia.com}}</ref>
 
An article in ElProgreso called for stricter supervision of third-party [[Legal financing|litigation funding]], including limits on potential awards, greater transparency in funding arrangements, safeguards against conflicts of interest, and measures to avoid unnecessary costs and delays.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Lugo |first=El Progreso de |date=2025-03-10 |title=Dieciocho mil millones de razones por las que Europa necesita leyes más estrictas sobre la financiación de litigios |url=https://www.elprogreso.es/articulo/comunicados/dieciocho-mil-millones-razones-que-europa-necesita-leyes-mas-estrictas-financiacion-litigios/202503101017571855923.html |access-date=2025-05-21 |website=El Progreso de Lugo |language=es}}</ref> An op-ed in Spanish newspaper Diario Siglo XXI also called for reforms in Spanish arbitration system to avoid instances like the $18 billion claim against Spain.
 
In early November 2024, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. signed the ''Philippine Maritime Zones Act'' and the ''Philippine Archipelagic Sea Lanes Act''.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-11-15 |title=Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime laws that it says infringe on its territory |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/malaysia-protests-philippine-maritime-laws-115829893.html?guccounter=1 |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=Yahoo News |language=en-US}}</ref> These laws reaffirmed the Philippines' maritime territories and rights to natural resources across the South China Sea, including Sabah, drawing strong criticism from Malaysia.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-11-15 |title=Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime laws that it says infringe on its territory |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/malaysia-protests-philippine-maritime-laws-115829893.html?guccounter=1 |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=Yahoo News |language=en-US}}</ref> On November 15, 2024, Kuala Lumpur lodged a diplomatic protest against the two maritime laws, arguing that they infringed upon Malaysia's territorial boundaries in the South China Sea.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime zones laws for South China Sea |url=https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2024/11/mil-241115-rfa01.htm |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=www.globalsecurity.org}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Punongbayan |first=Michael |title=Malaysia protests new Philippines maritime laws |url=https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/11/17/2400754/malaysia-protests-new-philippines-maritime-laws |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=Philstar.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-11-15 |title=Malaysia protests new Philippine maritime laws that it says infringe on its territory |url=https://www.yahoo.com/news/malaysia-protests-philippine-maritime-laws-115829893.html |access-date=2024-12-19 |website=Yahoo News |language=en-US}}</ref>
 
In March 2025, the Philippines reignited the Sabah dispute by submitting a note verbale to the United Nations, asserting it “''has never relinquished its sovereignty''” over North Borneo (Sabah) and invoking the 1963 Manila Accord to justify its position.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bautista |first=Jane |title=Philippines revives Sabah claim in note to United Nations |url=https://asianews.network/philippines-revives-sabah-claim-in-note-to-united-nations/ |access-date=2025-05-29 |website=asianews.network |language=en-US}}</ref> The note followed a controversial June 2024 filing in which Manila sought to extend its continental shelf from the Palawan region, citing “''geomorphological continuity''” with North Borneo.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bautista |first=Jane |title=Philippines revives Sabah claim in note to United Nations |url=https://asianews.network/philippines-revives-sabah-claim-in-note-to-united-nations/ |access-date=2025-05-29 |website=asianews.network |language=en-US}}</ref> Malaysia strongly opposed the move, submitting a formal protest to UN Secretary-General António Guterres and stating it “''categorically rejects the Philippines’ Partial Submission''”.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-04 |title=Malaysia-Philippines dispute over Sabah revived with seabed claim |url=https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3269063/indisputable-sovereignty-philippines-un-filing-reignites-sabah-dispute-malaysia |access-date=2025-05-29 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref> Kuala Lumpur reaffirmed that the Philippine claim was based on “''baselines of the Malaysian state of Sabah,''” which it called unacceptable.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-04 |title=Malaysia-Philippines dispute over Sabah revived with seabed claim |url=https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3269063/indisputable-sovereignty-philippines-un-filing-reignites-sabah-dispute-malaysia |access-date=2025-05-29 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref>
 
The ''South China Morning Post'' noted that the Philippine filing “''sparked vigorous protests''” and highlighted the “''considerable oil and gas resources''” at stake in the region.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-04 |title=Malaysia-Philippines dispute over Sabah revived with seabed claim |url=https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3269063/indisputable-sovereignty-philippines-un-filing-reignites-sabah-dispute-malaysia |access-date=2025-05-29 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref> Analysts cited by the paper observed that Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. may not aggressively pursue the issue further, given its limited diplomatic traction and the potential backlash.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2024-07-04 |title=Malaysia-Philippines dispute over Sabah revived with seabed claim |url=https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3269063/indisputable-sovereignty-philippines-un-filing-reignites-sabah-dispute-malaysia |access-date=2025-05-29 |website=South China Morning Post |language=en}}</ref>[[File:North Borneo Dispute territory.PNG|thumb|{{legend|#808000|Territory in the 1878 agreement – From the Pandassan River on the north west coast to the Sibuco River in the south.<ref>{{cite book|title=British North Borneo company charter (page 4)|url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924078409665#page/n7/mode/2up|publisher=OpenLibrary.org|year=1878|access-date=16 March 2013}}</ref>}}]]
 
===Other===
Outside the North Borneo dispute, the heirs and claimants of the Sulu sultanate have been involved in contemporary Philippine politics such as the lobbying for the creation of a constituent state called Zambasulta within the Philippines under a federal form of government.<ref name="mindanaoexaminer.com">{{Cite web|url=https://mindanaoexaminer.com/federal-state-of-zambasulta-pushed-in-mindanao/|title=Federal State of 'ZamBaSulTa' pushed in Mindanao &#124; Mindanao Examiner Regional Newspaper}}</ref>


==Economy==
==Economy==
Line 264: Line 226:


==Gallery==
==Gallery==
A yellow-colored flag was used in Sulu by the Chinese.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.royalpanji.net/the_chinese_community_in__sulu_sultanate.html|title=The Chinese Community in Sulu Sultanate |last=paopadd}}{{unreliable source?|date=October 2016}}</ref>
<gallery class="center">
<gallery class="center">
File:18th Century Flag of Sulu.svg|Flag of the Sultanate of Sulu according to [[Pierre Sonnerat]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.royalpanji.net/|title=Royal Panji|last=paopadd}}{{unreliable source?|date=October 2016}}</ref>
File:Merchant flag of the Chinese community in the Sulu Sultanate.svg|Merchant flag of the Chinese community in the Sultanate of Sulu
File:Merchant flag of the Chinese community in the Sulu Sultanate.svg|Merchant flag of the Chinese community in the Sultanate of Sulu
File:War Flag of Sulu Sultanate.svg|A [[war flag]] of the Sultanate of Sulu at the end of the 19th century
File:Daru Jambangan.jpg|[[Darul Jambangan]] (Palace of Flowers) in [[Maimbung]], residence to the Sultan (destroyed by a typhoon in 1932)<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/510823/before-his-death-kiram-iii-tells-family-to-continue-fight-to-re-possess-sabah |title=Before his death, Kiram III tells family to continue fight to re-possess Sabah &#124; Inquirer News|date=20 October 2013 }}</ref>
File:Bandeira Sulu.svg|The official flag of the Sultanate of Sulu under the guidance of Ampun Sultan [[Muedzul Lail Tan Kiram]] of Sulu.
</gallery>
</gallery>


==See also==
==See also==
{{Div col}}
{{Div col}}
* [[2013 Lahad Datu standoff]]
* [[List of sultans of Sulu]]
* [[List of Sunni Muslim dynasties]]
* [[Sultanate of Malacca]]
* [[Sultanate of Malacca]]
* [[Sultanate of Maguindanao]]
* [[Sultanate of Maguindanao]]
* [[John C. Bates]]
* [[John C. Bates]]
* [[Manila Accord]]
* [[Manila Accord]]
* [[Monarchy abolishment]]
* [[Abolition of monarchy]]
* [[Hinduism in the Philippines]]
* [[Hinduism in the Philippines]]
* [[History of the Philippines (Before 1521)]]
* [[History of the Philippines (Before 1521)]]
Line 293: Line 249:
{{Reflist|30em}}
{{Reflist|30em}}
;General
;General
* {{cite book
|title=The Sulu Archipelago and Its People
|year=1931
|last=Orosa
|first=Sixto Y.
|publisher=New Mercury Printing Press
|isbn=9781014290557
|url=https://archive.org/details/ahz9503.0001.001.umich.edu/
}}
* {{cite book
* {{cite book
|title=History for Brunei Darussalam: Sharing our Past
|title=History for Brunei Darussalam: Sharing our Past

Revision as of 04:29, 20 June 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Template:Use dmy datesTemplate:Use Philippine English Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Script error: No such module "Infobox".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Template:Main other

The Sultanate of Sulu (Template:Langx; Template:Langx; Template:Langx) is a Sunni Muslim subnational monarchy in the Republic of the Philippines[1][2][3]Script error: No such module "Unsubst". that ruled the Sulu Archipelago, coastal areas of Zamboanga City and certain portions of Palawan in the today's Philippines, alongside parts of present-day Sabah and North Kalimantan in north-eastern Borneo. Script error: No such module "Sidebar". Template:Pre-hispanic History of the Philippines The sultanate was founded either on 17 November 1405 or 1457[4][note 1] by Johore-born explorer and Sunni religious scholar Sharif ul-Hashim. Paduka Mahasari Maulana al Sultan Sharif ul-Hashim became his full regnal name; Sharif-ul Hashim is his abbreviated name. He settled in Buansa, Sulu.[7][8] The sultanate gained its independence from the Bruneian Empire in 1578.[9]

At its peak, it stretched over the islands that bordered the western peninsula of Zamboanga in Mindanao in the east to Palawan in the north. It also covered areas in the northeast of Borneo, stretching from Marudu Bay, Sabah[10][11] to Tepian, Sembakung subdistrict, North Kalimantan.[12][13] Another source stated the area included stretched from Kimanis Bay, which also overlaps with the boundaries of the Bruneian Sultanate.[14] Following the arrival of western powers such as the Spanish, the British, the Dutch, French, Germans, and the Americans, the Sultan thalassocracy and its sovereign political powers were relinquished by 1915 through an agreement, known as the Carpenter Agreement, that was signed with the United States.[3][15][16][17][18]

In Kakawin Nagarakretagama, the Sultanate of Sulu is referred to as Solot, one of the countries in the Tanjungnagara archipelago (Kalimantan-Philippines), which is one of the areas that is under the influence of the mandala area of the Majapahit kingdom in the archipelago.

History

Pre-establishment

File:Sulu archipelago.png
Map of the Sulu Archipelago

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

The present area of the Sultanate of Sulu was once under the influence of the Bruneian Empire before it gained its own independence in 1578.[9] During the 13th century the people of Sulu began migrating to present-day Zamboanga and Sulu archipelago from their homelands in northeastern Mindanao. Scott (1994) writes that the Sulu are the descendants of ancient Butuanons and Surigaonons from the Rajahnate of Butuan, which was then Hindu, like pre-islamic Sulu. They moved south and established a spice trading port in Sulu. Sultan Batarah Shah Tengah, who ruled as sultan in 1600, was said to be an actual native of Butuan.Template:Sfn The Butuanon-Surigaonon origins of the Tausugs are suggested by the relationship of their languages, as the Butuanon, Surigaonon and Tausug languages are all members of the Southern sub-family of Visayan. Later, the earliest known settlement in this area soon to be occupied by the sultanate was in Maimbung, Jolo. During this time, Sulu was called Lupah Sug.[8] The principality of Maimbung, populated by Buranun people (or Budanon, literally means "mountain-dwellers"), was first ruled by a certain rajah who assumed the title Rajah Sipad the Older. According to Majul, the origins of the title rajah sipad originated from the Hindu sri pada, which symbolises authority.[19] The principality was instituted and governed using the system of rajahs. Sipad the Older was succeeded by Sipad the Younger.

Some Chams who migrated to Sulu were called Orang Dampuan.[20]Script error: No such module "Unsubst". The Champa civilization and the port-kingdom of Sulu engaged in commerce with each other which resulted in merchant Chams settling in Sulu, where they were known as Orang Dampuan in the 10th–13th centuries. In contrast to their cousins in the Butuan Rajahnate, who considered themselves diplomatic competitors of Champa for China trade,[21] (under Butuan's Rajah Kiling); instead, Sulu freely traded with the Champa civilization. The Orang Dampuans from Champa however were eventually slaughtered by envious native Sulu Buranuns due to the wealth of the Orang Dampuan.[22] The Buranun were then subjected to retaliatory slaughter by the Orang Dampuan. Harmonious commerce between Sulu and the Orang Dampuan was later restored.[23] The Yakans were descendants of the Taguima-based Orang Dampuan who came to Sulu from Champa.[24] Sulu received civilization in its Indic form from the Orang Dampuan.[25]

During the reign of Sipad the Younger, a Sunni Sufi scholar and mystic[26] named Tuan Mashā′ikha[note 2] arrived in Jolo in 1280 CE.[note 3] Little is known to the origins and early biography of Tuan Mashā′ikha, except that he is a Muslim "who came from foreign lands" at the head of a fleet of Muslim traders,[28] or he was issued from a stalk of bamboo and was considered a prophet, thus well respected by the people.[29] Other reports, however, insisted that Tuan Mashā′ikha together with his parents, Jamiyun Kulisa and Indra Suga, were sent to Sulu by Alexander the Great (who is known as Iskandar Zulkarnain in Malay Annals).[19] However, Najeeb Mitry Saleeby, a Lebanese American doctor who wrote A History of Sulu in 1908 and other studies of the Moros, dismisses this claim by concluding that Jamiyun Kulisa and Indra Suga were mythical names.[29] According to tarsila, during the coming of Tuan Mashā′ikha, the people of Maimbung worshipped tombs and stones of any kind. After he preached Islam in the area, he married Sipad the Younger's daughter, Idda Indira Suga, who bore three children:[30] Tuan Hakim, Tuan Pam and 'Aisha. Tuan Hakim, in turn, begot five children.[31] From the genealogy of Tuan Mashā′ikha, another titular system of aristocracy called "tuanship" started in Sulu. Apart from the Idda Indira Suga, Tuan Mashā′ikha also married another "unidentified woman" and begot Moumin. Tuan Mashā′ikha died in 710 A.H. (equivalent to 1310 AD), and was buried in Bud Dato near Jolo, with an inscription of Tuan Maqbālū.[32]

A descendant of the Sunni Sufi Shaykh Tuan Mashā′ikha named Tuan May also begot a son named Datu Tka. The descendants of Tuan May did not assume the title of tuan, but instead, used datu. This was the first time datu was used as a political institution.[30][33] During the coming of Tuan Mashā′ikha, the Tagimaha people (literally means "the party of the people") from Basilan and several places in Mindanao, also arrived and settled in Buansa. After the Tagimaha came the Baklaya people, (which means "seashore dwellers"), who are believed to have originated from Sulawesi, and settled in Patikul. After these came the Bajau people (or Samal) from Johor. The Bajau were driven towards Sulu by a heavy monsoon, some of them to the shores of Brunei and others to Mindanao.[34] The population of Buranun, Tagimaha, and Baklaya in Sulu created three parties with distinct systems of government and subjects. In the 1300s the Chinese annals, Nanhai zhi, reported that Brunei invaded or administered the Philippine kingdoms of Butuan, Sulu and Ma-i (Mindoro), which did not regain their independence until later date.[35] According to the Nagarakretagama, the Majapahit Empire under Emperor Hayam Wuruk invaded Sulu in 1365. However in 1369, the Sulus rebelled and regained independence and in vengeance assaulted the Majapahit Empire and its province Po-ni (Brunei), as well as the northeast coast of Borneo[36] and thereafter went to the capital, looting it of treasure and gold. In the sacking of Brunei, the Sulus stole two sacred pearls from the Bruneian king.[37] A fleet from the Majapahit capital succeeded in driving away the Sulus, but Po-ni was left weaker after the attack.Template:Sfn Since Chinese historiographies later recorded there to be a Maharaja of Sulu, it is assumed that the Majapahit did not take it back, and it was a rival to it. By 1390 CE, Rajah Baguinda Ali, a prince of the Pagaruyung Kingdom, arrived at Sulu and married into the local nobility. At least in 1417, when Sulu rivaled Majapahit according to Chinese annals, three kings (or monarchs) ruled three civilized kingdoms in the island.[38] Patuka Pahala (Paduka Batara) ruled the eastern kingdom (Sulu Archipelago) -- he was the most powerful; the western kingdom was ruled by Mahalachi (Maharajah Kamal ud-Din), ruler of Kalimantan in Indonesia; and the kingdom near the cave (or Cave King) was Paduka Patulapok from Palawan Island.[39] The Bajau settlers were distributed among the three kingdoms. During this time, Sulu avenged itself for Majapahit Imperialism by encroaching upon the Majapahit Empire as the alliance of the three Sulu kings had territory that reached East and North Kalimantan, which were former Majapahit provinces.[40]

Moumin's descendants the son of Tuan Mashā′ikha populated Sulu.Template:Clarify After some time, a certain Timway Orangkaya Su'il was mentioned by the second page of tarsila; he received four Bisaya slaves (people from the Kedatuan of Madja-as) from Manila (presumably Kingdom of Maynila) as a sign of friendship between the two countries. The descendants of Su'il also inherited the title Timway, which means "chief". On tarsila's third page, it accounts the fact that the slaves were the ancestors of the inhabitants in the island to Parang, Lati, Gi'tung, and Lu'uk respectively.

The fourth page then narrates the coming of the Buranun (addressed in the tarsila as "the Maimbung people"), Tagimaha, Baklaya, and finally the drifted Bajau immigrants from Johor.[41] The condition of Sulu before the arrival of Islam can be summarized as such: The island was inhabited by several cultures, and was reigned over by three independent kingdoms ruled by the Buranun, Tagimaha, and Baklaya peoples. Likewise, the socio-political systems of these kingdoms were characterized by several distinct institutions: rajahship, datuship, tuanship and timwayship. The arrival of Tuan Mashā′ikha afterwards established a core Islamic community in the island.

Islamization and establishment

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The Sulu Archipelago was an entrepôt that attracted merchants from south China and various parts of Southeast Asia beginning in the 14th century.[42] The name "Sulu" is attested in Chinese historical records as early as 1349,[43] during the late Yuan dynasty (1271–1368), suggesting trade relations around this time.[44] Trade continued into the early Ming dynasty (1368–1644); envoys were sent in several missions to China to trade and pay tribute to the emperor. Sulu merchants often exchanged goods with Chinese Muslims, and also traded with Muslims of Arab, Persian, Malay, or Indian descent.[42] Islamic historian Cesar Adib Majul argues that Islam was introduced to the Sulu Archipelago in the late 14th century by Chinese and Arab merchants and missionaries from Ming China.[43][44] The seven Arab missionaries were called "Lumpang Basih" by the Tausug, and were Sunni Sufi scholars from the Ba 'Alawi sada of Yemen.[45] A yellow-colored flag was used in Sulu by the Chinese community.[46]

Around this time, a notable Arab judge, Sunni Sufi and religious scholar Karim ul-Makhdum[note 4] from Mecca arrived in Malacca. He preached Islam, particularly the Ash'ari Aqeeda and Shafi'i Madh'hab as well as the Qadiriyya Tariqa, and many citizens, including the ruler of Malacca, converted to Islam.[47] Sulu leader Paduka Pahala and his sons moved to China, where he died. Chinese Muslims brought up his sons in Dezhou, where their descendants live and have the surnames An and Wen. In 1380 CE,[note 5] Karim ul-Makhdum arrived in Simunul island from Malacca, again with Arab traders. Apart from being a scholar, he operated as a trader; some see him as a Sufi missionary from Mecca.[48] He preached Islam, and was accepted by the core Muslim community. He was the second person to preach Islam in the area, after Tuan Mashā′ikha. To facilitate conversion of nonbelievers, he established a mosque in Tubig-Indagan, Simunul, the first Islamic temple to be constructed in the area, or in the Philippines. This later became known as the Sheik Karimal Makdum Mosque.[49] He died in Sulu, although the exact location of his grave is unknown. In Buansa, he was known as Tuan Sharif Awliyā.[19] On his alleged grave in Bud Agad, Jolo, an inscription reads "Mohadum Aminullah Al-Nikad". In Lugus, he is referred to as Abdurrahman. In Sibutu, he is known by his name.[50] The differing beliefs about his grave's location came about because the Qadiri Shaykh Karim ul-Makhdum travelled to several islands in the Sulu Sea to preach Islam. In many places in the archipelago, he was beloved. It is said that the people of Tapul built a mosque honouring him and that they claim descent from Karim ul-Makhdum. The customs, beliefs and political laws of the people changed and adapted to adopt the Islamic tradition.[51]

Sulu abruptly stopped sending tributes to the Ming in 1424.[44] Antonio Pigafetta recorded in his journals that the sultan of Brunei invaded Sulu to retrieve the two sacred pearls Sulu had previously pillaged from Brunei.[52] A sultan of Brunei, Sultan Bolkiah married a princess (dayang-dayang) of Sulu, Puteri Laila Menchanai, and they became the grandparents of the Muslim prince of Maynila, Rajah Matanda. Manila was a Muslim city-state and vassal to Brunei before the Spanish colonized it and converted it from Islam to Christianity.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". Islamic Manila ended after the failed attack of Tarik Sulayman, a Muslim Kapampangan commander, in the failure of the Conspiracy of the Maharlikas, when the formerly Muslim Manila nobility attempted a secret alliance with the Japanese shogunate and Bruneiean sultanate (together with her Manila and Sulu allies) to expel the Spaniards from the Philippines.[53] Many Tausugs and other native Muslims of Sulu Sultanate already interacted with Kapampangan and Tagalog Muslims called Luzones based in Brunei, and there were intermarriages between them. The Spanish had native allies against the former Muslims they conquered like Hindu Tondo which resisted Islam when Brunei invaded and established Manila as a Muslim city-state to supplant Hindu Tondo.

Maritime power

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Iranun pirate.png
An Iranun pirate.

The Sulu sultanate became notorious for its so-called "Moro Raids" or acts of piracy on Spanish settlements in the Visayan areas in Northern Philippines and from coastal and river villages in North Borneo (Sabah), with the aim of capturing natives to be sold at slave markets in the Sulu Island (Jolo Island) and Tawi Tawi Island.[54] Tausug pirates used boats known collectively by Europeans as proas (predominantly the lanong and garay warships), which varied in design and were much lighter than the Spanish galleons and could easily out-sail these ships, and also often carried large swivel guns or lantaka and also carried a crew of pirates from different ethnic groups throughout Sulu, such as the Iranun, Bajaus and Tausugs alike. By the 18th century, Sulu pirates had become virtual masters of the Sulu seas and the surrounding areas, wreaking havoc and conducting raids to kidnap natives living in Spanish and Brunei North Borneo settlements for the slave trade.[55] This prompted the Spaniards to build a number of fortifications[56] across the Visayan islands of Cebu and Bohol; churches were built on higher ground, and watchtowers were built along coastlines to warn of impending raids.

The maritime supremacy of Sulu was not directly controlled by the sultan; independent datus and warlords waged their own wars against the Spaniards and even with the capture of Jolo on numerous occasions by the Spaniards, other settlements like Maimbung, Banguingui and Tawi-Tawi were used as assembly areas and hideouts for pirates.

The sultanate's control over the Sulu seas was at its height around the late 17th to early 18th centuries when Moro raids became very common for the Borneo natives, Visayans and Spaniards.

In Sulu and in the Mindanao interior, the slave trade flourished and majority of the slaves that were being imported and exported were of Visayan ethnicity; the term Bisaya eventually became synonymous to "slave" in these areas. Its maritime supremacy over the Spaniards, at the time, the Spaniards acquired steam-powered ships that began to curb Muslim piracy in the region, the Moro piratical raids began to decrease in number until Governor Narciso Clavería launched the Balanguingui expedition in 1848 to crush the pirate settlements there, effectively ending the Moro pirate raids. By the last quarter of the 19th century, Moro pirates had virtually disappeared and the maritime influence of the sultanate became dependent on the Chinese junk trade. The piracy and slave trade was brought to an end by the Spanish who destroyed the Sulu Sultanate in 1878 with a formal surrender and capitulation of the Sultanate once and for all. Once the Americans arrived, further attempts at resurrection to their old piracy ways were put down swiftly.

Conquest of Northeastern Borneo

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:18th Century Flag of Sulu.svg
18th century flag of the Sultanate of Sulu according to explorer Pierre Sonnerat.[57]

In 1746, Sultan Azim ud-Din I, with Spanish assistance, carried out punitive expeditions around the Sebuku region against the Tidungs to reconsolidate his power in Borneo. By April 1747, the expeditions were declared a success and the chief of Tarakan declared his allegiance to Sulu. After the Sultan returned to Sulu, he brought back 50 captives who were previously under the hands of the Tidung and among them was a friar, while others were Tidung chiefs. Two of the Tidung chiefs were left in Jolo while the rest were brought to Zamboanga.[58] Tausug traders began settling in Tarakan. However, things began to complicate after the Tidungs made a political marriage with Bulungan, placing the Tidungs also under the Sultanate of Bulungan.[59]

In 1789, amidst the civil war in Berau, Sultan Azim ud-Din II raided Berau and Tarakan, which led to the de facto independence of Bulungan from Berau by the 18th-19th century. Sulu became the dominant power in the region and Bulungan was placed under the sphere of influence of the former. Tausug vessels began arriving in the region at a large scale to conduct trade. The status of Bulungan as a subject of Sulu however would later change after they stopped paying tribute to Sulu in 1855. This would later become official after the British annexation of North Borneo and the Dutch annexation of Bulungan in 1878.[58][60][61]

Spanish and British annexations

Template:Multiple image In the 18th century, Sulu's dominion covered most of northeastern part of Borneo. However areas like Tempasuk and Abai had never really shown much allegiance to its earlier ruler, Brunei, subsequently similar treatment was given to Sulu. Alexander Dalrymple, who made a treaty of allegiance in 1761 with Sulu, had to make a similar agreement with the rulers of Tempasuk and Abai on the north Borneo coast in 1762.[62] The Sultanate of Sulu totally gave up its domain over Palawan to Spain in 1705 and Basilan to Spain in 1762. The territory ceded to Sulu by Brunei initially stretched south to Tapean Durian (now Tanjong Mangkalihat) (another source mentioned a southernmost boundary at Dumaring),[63] near the Straits of Macassar (now Kalimantan). From 1726 to 1733, the Sulu sultanate restarted their tributary relationship with China, now the Qing Empire, about 300 years after it had ended.[64]

By 1849, the areas gained from Brunei had been effectively controlled by the Sultanate of Bulungan in Kalimantan, reducing the boundary of Sulu to a cape named Batu Tinagat and the Tawau River.[65]

In 1848 and 1851, the Spanish launched attacks on Balanguingui and Jolo respectively. A peace treaty was signed on 30 April 1851Template:Refn in which the sultan could only regain the capital if Sulu and its dependencies became a part of the Philippine Islands under the sovereignty of Spain. There were different understandings of this treaty; although the Spanish interpreted it as the sultan accepting Spanish sovereignty over Sulu and Tawi-Tawi, but the sultan took it as a friendly treaty amongst equals. These areas were only partially controlled by the Spanish, and their power was limited to military stations and garrisons and pockets of civilian settlements. This lasted until they had to abandon the region as a consequence of their defeat in the Spanish–American War. On 22 January 1878, an agreement was signed between the Sultanate of Sulu and British commercial syndicate of Alfred Dent and Baron von Overbeck, which stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used) to the British in return for payment of five thousand Malayan dollars per year.[66][67]

<templatestyles src="Col-begin/styles.css"/>

On 22 April 1903, Sultan Jamalul Kiram II signed a document known as "Confirmation of cession of certain islands", in which he granted and ceded additional islands in the neighbourhood of the mainland of North Borneo from Banggi Island to Sibuku Bay to the British North Borneo Company. The confirmatory deed of 1903 makes it known and understood between the two parties that the islands mentioned were included in the cession of the districts and islands mentioned on 22 January 1878 agreement. Additional cession money was set at 300 dollars a year with arrears due for past occupation of 3,200 dollars. The originally agreed 5,000 dollars increased to 5,300 dollars per year payable annually.[68][69][70][note 6]

Madrid Protocol

File:President Taft and the Sultan of Sulu (1913).png
Sultan Jamalul Kiram II with William Howard Taft of the Philippine Commission in Jolo, Sulu (27 March 1901)

The Sulu sultanate later came under the control of Spain in Manila. In 1885, Great Britain, Germany, and Spain signed the Madrid Protocol to cement Spanish influence over the islands of the Philippines. In the same agreement, Spain relinquished all claim to North Borneo which had belonged to the sultanate in the past to the British government.[71]

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

The Spanish Government renounces, as far as regards the British Government, all claims of sovereignty over the territories of the continent of Borneo, which belong, or which have belonged in the past to the Sultan of Sulu (Jolo), and which comprise the neighbouring islands of Balambangan, Banguey, and Malawali, as well as all those comprised within a zone of three maritime leagues from the coast, and which form part of the territories administered by the Company styled the "British North Borneo Company".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Decline

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:War Flag of Sulu Sultanate.svg
A war flag of the Sultanate of Sulu at the end of the 19th century

Following the defeat of the Moro Rebellion, the Sultanate of Sulu's existence effectively ceased on 22 March 1915, when American commanders demanded Sultan Jamalul Kiram II signed an agreement called the Carpenter Agreement. By this agreement, the sultan relinquished all sovereignty over territory then under control of the United States, retaining only his religious authority as head of Islam in Sulu.[18][3]

North Borneo dispute

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:W.C.Cowie and A.Cook-SultanOfSulu.png
W. C. Cowie, managing director of BNBC, with the Sultan of Sulu.

The North Borneo dispute or Sabah dispute is a territorial dispute between the Philippines and Malaysia over much of the eastern part of Sabah (known as North Borneo prior to the formation of the Malaysian federation in 1963), stemming from a difference in interpretation over the language used in the 1878 agreement signed between Sultanate of Sulu and Baron von Overbeck. The document stipulated that North Borneo was either ceded or leased (depending on translation used of the Malay term pajakkan) to Overbeck's chartered company in return for payment of 5,000 dollars per year.

The Philippines, presenting itself as the successor state to the Sultanate of Sulu, claim Sabah on the basis that Sabah was only leased to the British North Borneo Company, with the sultanate's sovereignty never being relinquished, the Eastern Sabah territory having been allegedly gifted by the Brunei Sultanate to the Sulu Sultanate due to Sulu intervention in the Brunei Civil War. This was made official in a 1968 Filipino act declaring the territory of Sabah under their "dominion and sovereignty"[72] and later confirmed by a 2011 decision by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.[73]

Malaysia views the dispute as a "non-issue", dismissing calls to resolve the matter in the International Court of Justice,[74] as it not only considers the agreement in 1878 as one of cession, but it also deems that the residents had exercised their act of self-determination when they joined to form the Malaysian federation in 1963.[75][76] As reported by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the independence of North Borneo was brought about as the result of the expressed wish of the majority of the people of the territory as supported by the findings of the Cobbold Commission.[77]

Moreover, a later 1903 Confirmation of Cession agreement between the sultan of Sulu and the British governmen provided reaffirmation regarding the understanding of the sultan of Sulu on the treaty in 1878, i.e. it is of the form of a cession.[78][79] Every year until 2013, the Malaysian Embassy in the Philippines issued a cheque in the amount of RM5,300 (approx. 77,000 or US$1,710) to the legal counsel of the heirs of the sultan of Sulu. Malaysia considered the settlement an annual "cession payment" for the disputed state, while the sultan's descendants considered it "rent".[80]

The annual payments to the heirs of the sultan were stopped after the 2013 Lahad Datu standoff, in which a group of armed individuals sent by Jamalul Kiram III, one of the claimants to the Sulu throne, arrived by boat in Lahad Datu, Sabah, from the southern Philippines, in an attempt to assert their territorial claim to North Borneo.[81] During the ensuing standoff, 56 of Jamalul's supporters were killed, along with 6 civilians and 10 Malaysian soldiers, leading to public pressure towards the Malaysian government to cancel the payments. Seven Filipino men involved in the incident were eventually given the death penalty.[82] Malaysia considered that the standoff violated the 1878 treaty.[83][84]

In February 2022, after relatives of the last Sultan sued the Malaysian government for violation of the treaty that had established the annual cession payment, a Paris arbitration court awarded at least US$14.92 billion (RM62.59 billion) to the descendants of the Sulu sultan, in what became known as the Malaysia Sulu case.[85] The claims were subsequently litigated in the Spanish, French, and Dutch court systems.[86] Malaysia obtained a final victory in the French Court of Cassation on 6 November 2024, dismissing the claims of the Sulu heirs.[87]

Economy

Weapons and slave trade

File:Moro cannon or swivel gun (lantaka) from the Sulu Archipelago, brass, Honolulu Museum of Art.jpg
A Moro brass lantaka or swivel gun.

Chinese who lived in Sulu ran guns across a Spanish blockade to supply the Moro datus and sultanates with weapons to fight the Spanish, who were engaging in a campaign to subjugate the Moro sultanates on Mindanao. A trade involving the Moros selling slaves and other goods in exchange for guns developed. The Chinese had entered the economy of the sultanate, taking almost total control of the sultanate's economies in Mindanao and dominating the markets. Though the sultans did not like one group of people exercising exclusive control over the economy, they did business with them.

File:Iranun lanong warship by Rafael Monleón (1890).jpg
19th century illustration of a lanong, the main warships used by the Iranun and Banguingui people of the navies of the sultanates of Sulu and Maguindanao for piracy and slave raids

The Chinese set up a trading network between Singapore, Zamboanga, Jolo and Sulu. The Chinese sold small arms like Enfield and Spencer Rifles to the Buayan Datu Uto. They were used to battle the Spanish invasion of Buayan. The datu paid for the weapons in slaves.[88] The population of Chinese in Mindanao in the 1880s was 1,000. The Chinese ran guns across a Spanish blockade to sell to Mindanao Moros. The purchases of these weapons were paid for by the Moros in slaves in addition to other goods. The main group of people selling guns were the Chinese in Sulu. The Chinese took control of the economy and used steamers to ship goods for exporting and importing. Opium, ivory, textiles, and crockery were among the other goods which the Chinese sold.

The Chinese on Maimbung sent the weapons to the Sulu sultanate, who used them to battle the Spanish and resist their attacks. A Chinese-Mestizo was one of the sultan's brothers-in-law, the sultan was married to his sister. He and the sultan both owned shares in the ship (named the Far East) which helped smuggle the weapons.[88] The Spanish launched a surprise offensive under Colonel Juan Arolas in April 1887 by attacking the sultanate's capital at Maimbung in an effort to crush resistance. Weapons were captured and the property of the Chinese were destroyed while the Chinese were deported to Jolo.[88]

Pearling industry

File:Sultan Jamal ul-Azam of Sulu receiving French delegation.jpg
A painting from 1880s depicting Sultan Jamal ul-Azam having a conversation with the French visitors.

After the destruction of the pirate haunts of Balanguingui effectively ending the centuries of slave raids, which the Sulu sultanate's economy had so depended on, along with the economy of mainland Mindanao, the sultanate's economy experienced a sharp decline as slaves became more inaccessible and the islands' agricultural produce wasn't enough, thus it became dependent on the Mindanao interior even for rice and produce.[89] Although the Spaniards thought they had dealt the death blow for the sultanate when they captured Jolo in 1876, rather, the sultanate's capital and economic and trading hub was moved to Maimbung on the other side of the island. Up until the American occupation, this was the residence and economic center of Sulu. This is where the Sultan Jamalul Kiram II and his adviser Hadji Butu began the Sulu pearling industry to increase the sultan's wealth, they organized the Sulu pearling fleet, which remained active well into the early 20th century. In 1910, the sultan reportedly sold a giant pearl in London for $100,000.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Culture

Social class system

Among the people of the Sultanate of Sulu, nobility could be acquired only by lineage, a closed hereditary system.

File:Sulu Craft off Sandakau, with Mecca Pilgrims.jpg
Sulu vessel carrying pilgrims to Mecca, 1899.

There were two royal classes:[90]

  • Datu (susultanun), acquired purely by lineage. All male members of the royal house of Sulu held this title and style "His Royal Highness (HRH)". Their spouses automatically held the title of Dayangdayang (princess of the first degree). Adopted members of the royal house of Sulu were styled "His Highness (HH)" and their spouses also held the title of Dayangdayang and the style: "Her Highness".
  • Datu sadja, which may be acquired through confirming the titles (gullal) on the middleman of the sultan. The gullal is made if a commoner has achieved outstanding feats or services in line of duty through display of bravery, heroism, etc. Datu sadja is a life title of nobility and the title holders hold the style "His Excellency" and their spouses should hold the title of dayang the style "Her Excellency".

Maharlika, or commoners, do not trace their descent from royalty. The upper subclasses held administrative roles:

  • Wakil Kesultanan – regional representative outside the sultanate
  • Panglima – regional representative inside the sultanate
  • Parkasaaide-de-camp of region representative inside the sultanate
  • Laksaman– subregional representative inside the sultanate

The men who hold the offices above were addressed by the title of nobility Tuan (the title is directly attached to the office), followed by the rank of the office they hold, their given name, surname and region. The women who held offices above shall be addressed by the title of nobility Sitti (the title is directly attached to the office), followed by the same name order.

A very large part of the Sulu society, as well as in the Sultanate of Maguindanao were slaves captured from slave raids or bought from slave markets. They were known as the bisaya, reflecting their most common origin – Christianized Visayans from Spanish territories in the Philippines – although they also included captured slaves from other ethnic groups throughout Southeast Asia. They were also known as banyaga, ipun, or ammas. It is estimated that as much as 50% of the population of Sulu in the 1850s were bisaya slaves and dominated the Sulu economy. For the most part, they were treated like commoners, with their own houses and were responsible for cultivating farms and fisheries of Tausug nobility. But there were harsh punishments for attempts to escape, and a large number of the slaves were sold to European, Chinese, Makassar, and Bugis slavers in the Dutch East Indies.[91][92]

Visual arts

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Lute (kutyapi), Mindanao, wood, Honolulu Museum of Art.jpg
A kutiyapi (lute) from Mindanao bearing Ukkil motifs.

The Sultanate of Sulu, along with the rest of Mindanao, has a long tradition of decorative arts known as ukkil or okir. Ukkil is the Tausug word for "wood carving" or "engraving". The Tausug and Maranao peoples traditionally carved and decorated their boats, houses and even grave markers with ukkil carvings. Aside from wood carvings, ukkil motifs were found on various clothing in the Sulu archipelago. Ukkil motifs tend to emphasise geometric patterns and a flowing design, with floral and leaf patterns as well as folk elements. The Tausug also decorated their weapons with these motifs, and various kris and barong blades have finely decorated handles as well as blades covered in floral patterns and the like.[93] Bronze lantaka also bear some ukkil patterns.

Gallery

See also

Template:Div col

Template:Col div end

Notes

Template:Reflist

References

Template:Reflist

General
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link

External links

Template:Commons category-inline

Template:Sultans of Sulu and claimants Template:Former and present states in the Philippines Template:India-related topics in Philippines Template:British overseas territories Template:History of East Malaysia Template:Asia in topic

Template:Coord

Template:Authority control

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  13. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. a b c Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  20. https://www.wattpad.com/5944709-history-of-the-philippines-chapter-3-our-early https://tekalong.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/chps-1-3.pdf Template:Webarchive
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  27. Script error: No such module "Footnotes"., footnote 51
  28. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  29. a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  30. a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  31. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  32. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  33. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  34. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  36. Ming shi, 325, pp. 8411, 8422.
  37. Brunei Rediscovered: A Survey of Early Times By Robert Nicholl, p. 12, citing: "Groenveldt, Notes Page 112"
  38. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  40. Reading Song-Ming Records on the Pre-colonial History of the Philippines By Wang Zhenping, p. 258.
  41. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  42. a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  43. a b Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  44. a b c Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  45. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  47. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  48. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  51. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  52. Brunei Rediscovered: A Survey of Early Times By Robert Nicholl p. 45.
  53. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  58. a b Bond, Natan (December 2020). "Seeking the state from the margins: From Tidung Lands to borderlands in Borneo". School of Social and Political Sciences. The University of Melbourne. Retrieved 19 January 2025
  59. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  60. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  62. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  63. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:Dead link
  68. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:PD-notice
  70. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Template:PD-notice
  71. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  73. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  75. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  77. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  78. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  79. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  80. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  81. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  82. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  83. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  84. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  85. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  86. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  87. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  88. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  89. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  90. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  91. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  92. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  93. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  94. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".


Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "note", but no corresponding <references group="note"/> tag was found