Removable singularity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>InternetArchiveBot
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
imported>Quondum
fmt uniformity
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Undefined point on a holomorphic function which can be made regular}}
{{short description|Undefined point on a holomorphic function which can be made regular}}
{{More citations needed|date=July 2021}}
{{more citations needed|date=July 2021}}
[[File:Graph of x squared undefined at x equals 2.svg|thumb|right|200px|A graph of a [[parabola]] with a '''removable singularity''' at {{math|1=''x'' = 2}}]]
[[File:Graph of x squared undefined at x equals 2.svg|thumb|right|200px|A graph of a [[parabola]] with a '''removable singularity''' at {{math|1=''x'' = 2}}]]


Line 6: Line 6:


For instance, the (unnormalized) [[sinc function]], as defined by
For instance, the (unnormalized) [[sinc function]], as defined by
:<math> \text{sinc}(z) = \frac{\sin z}{z} </math>
: <math> \text{sinc}(z) = \frac{\sin z}{z} </math>
has a singularity at {{math|1=''z'' = 0}}. This singularity can be removed by defining <math>\text{sinc}(0) := 1,</math> which is the [[Limit of a function|limit]] of {{math|sinc}} as {{mvar|z}} tends to 0. The resulting function is holomorphic. In this case the problem was caused by {{math|sinc}} being given an [[indeterminate form]]. Taking a [[power series]] expansion for <math display="inline">\frac{\sin(z)}{z}</math> around the singular point shows that
has a singularity at {{tmath|1= z = 0}}. This singularity can be removed by defining {{tmath|1= \text{sinc}(0) := 1 }}, which is the [[Limit of a function|limit]] of {{math|sinc}} as {{tmath| z }} tends to {{tmath| 0 }}. The resulting function is holomorphic. In this case the problem was caused by {{math|sinc}} being given an [[indeterminate form]]. Taking a [[power series]] expansion for {{tmath| \textstyle \frac{\sin(z)}{z} }} around the singular point shows that
:<math> \text{sinc}(z) = \frac{1}{z}\left(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^kz^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!} \right) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^kz^{2k}}{(2k+1)!} = 1 - \frac{z^2}{3!} + \frac{z^4}{5!} - \frac{z^6}{7!} + \cdots. </math>
: <math> \text{sinc}(z) = \frac{1}{z}\left(\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^kz^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!} \right) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^kz^{2k}}{(2k+1)!} = 1 - \frac{z^2}{3!} + \frac{z^4}{5!} - \frac{z^6}{7!} + \cdots. </math>


Formally, if <math>U \subset \mathbb C</math> is an [[open subset]] of the [[complex plane]] <math>\mathbb C</math>, <math>a \in U</math> a point of <math>U</math>, and <math>f: U\setminus \{a\} \rightarrow \mathbb C</math> is a [[holomorphic function]], then <math>a</math> is called a '''removable singularity''' for <math>f</math> if there exists a holomorphic function <math>g: U \rightarrow \mathbb C</math> which coincides with <math>f</math> on <math>U\setminus \{a\}</math>. We say <math>f</math> is holomorphically extendable over <math>U</math> if such a <math>g</math> exists.
Formally, if <math>U \subset \mathbb C</math> is an [[open subset]] of the [[complex plane]] {{tmath| \mathbb C }}, <math>a \in U</math> a point of {{tmath| U }}, and <math>f: U\smallsetminus \{a\} \rightarrow \mathbb C</math> is a [[holomorphic function]], then <math>a</math> is called a '''removable singularity''' for <math>f</math> if there exists a holomorphic function <math>g: U \rightarrow \mathbb C</math> which coincides with <math>f</math> on {{tmath| U\smallsetminus \{a\} }}. We say <math>f</math> is holomorphically extendable over <math>U</math> if such a <math>g</math> exists.


== Riemann's theorem ==
== Riemann's theorem ==
Line 16: Line 16:
[[Bernhard Riemann|Riemann's]] theorem on removable singularities is as follows:
[[Bernhard Riemann|Riemann's]] theorem on removable singularities is as follows:


{{math theorem| Let <math>D \subset \mathbb C</math> be an open subset of the complex plane, <math>a \in D</math> a point of <math>D</math> and <math>f</math> a holomorphic function defined on the set <math>D \setminus \{a\}</math>.  The following are equivalent:
{{math theorem| Let <math>D \subset \mathbb C</math> be an open subset of the complex plane, <math>a \in D</math> a point of <math>D</math> and <math>f</math> a holomorphic function defined on the set {{tmath| D \smallsetminus \{a\} }}.  The following are equivalent:
 
# <math>f</math> is holomorphically extendable over {{tmath| a }}.  
# <math>f</math> is holomorphically extendable over <math>a</math>.  
# <math>f</math> is continuously extendable over {{tmath| a }}.  
# <math>f</math> is continuously extendable over <math>a</math>.  
# There exists a [[neighborhood (topology)|neighborhood]] of <math>a</math> on which <math>f</math> is [[bounded function|bounded]].
# There exists a [[neighborhood (topology)|neighborhood]] of <math>a</math> on which <math>f</math> is [[bounded function|bounded]].
# <math>\lim_{z\to a}(z - a) f(z) = 0</math>.}}
# {{tmath|1= \lim_{z\to a}(z - a) f(z) = 0 }}.}}


The implications 1 ⇒ 2 ⇒ 3 ⇒ 4 are trivial. To prove 4 ⇒ 1, we first recall that the holomorphy of a function at <math>a</math> is equivalent to it being analytic at <math>a</math> ([[Proof that holomorphic functions are analytic|proof]]), i.e. having a power series representation. Define
The implications 1 ⇒ 2 ⇒ 3 ⇒ 4 are trivial. To prove 4 ⇒ 1, we first recall that the holomorphy of a function at <math>a</math> is equivalent to it being analytic at <math>a</math> ([[Proof that holomorphic functions are analytic|proof]]), i.e. having a power series representation. Define
 
: <math>
:<math>
   h(z) = \begin{cases}
   h(z) = \begin{cases}
     (z - a)^2 f(z) &  z \ne a ,\\
     (z - a)^2 f(z) &  z \ne a ,\\
Line 32: Line 30:
</math>
</math>


Clearly, ''h'' is holomorphic on <math> D \setminus \{a\}</math>, and there exists
Clearly, {{tmath| h }} is holomorphic on {{tmath| D \smallsetminus \{a\} }}, and there exists
:<math>h'(a)=\lim_{z\to a}\frac{(z - a)^2f(z)-0}{z-a}=\lim_{z\to a}(z - a) f(z)=0</math>
: <math>h'(a)=\lim_{z\to a}\frac{(z - a)^2f(z)-0}{z-a}=\lim_{z\to a}(z - a) f(z)=0</math>
by 4, hence ''h'' is holomorphic on ''D'' and has a [[Taylor series]] about ''a'':
by 4, hence {{tmath| h }} is holomorphic on {{tmath| D }} and has a [[Taylor series]] about {{tmath| a }}:
: <math>h(z) = c_0 + c_1(z-a) + c_2 (z - a)^2 + c_3 (z - a)^3 + \ldots \, .</math>


:<math>h(z) = c_0 + c_1(z-a) + c_2 (z - a)^2 + c_3 (z - a)^3 + \cdots \, .</math>
We have {{tmath|1= c_0 = h(a) = 0 }} and {{tmath|1= c_1 = h'(a) = 0}}; therefore
: <math>h(z) = c_2 (z - a)^2 + c_3 (z - a)^3 + \ldots \, .</math>


We have ''c''<sub>0</sub> = ''h''(''a'') = 0 and ''c''<sub>1</sub> = ''h{{'}}''(''a'') = 0; therefore
Hence, where {{tmath| z \ne a }}, we have:
 
: <math>f(z) = \frac{h(z)}{(z - a)^2} = c_2 + c_3 (z - a) + \ldots \, .</math>
:<math>h(z) = c_2 (z - a)^2 + c_3 (z - a)^3 + \cdots \, .</math>
 
Hence, where <math>z \ne a</math>, we have:
 
:<math>f(z) = \frac{h(z)}{(z - a)^2} = c_2 + c_3 (z - a) + \cdots \, .</math>


However,
However,
 
: <math>g(z) = c_2 + c_3 (z - a) + \cdots \, .</math>
:<math>g(z) = c_2 + c_3 (z - a) + \cdots \, .</math>
is holomorphic on {{tmath| D }}, thus an extension of {{tmath| f }}.
 
is holomorphic on ''D'', thus an extension of <math> f </math>.


== Other kinds of singularities ==
== Other kinds of singularities ==


Unlike functions of a real variable, holomorphic functions are sufficiently rigid that their isolated singularities can be completely classified. A holomorphic function's singularity is either not really a singularity at all, i.e. a removable singularity, or one of the following two types:
Unlike functions of a real variable, holomorphic functions are sufficiently rigid that their isolated singularities can be completely classified. A holomorphic function's singularity is either not really a singularity at all, i.e. a removable singularity, or one of the following two types:
# In light of Riemann's theorem, given a non-removable singularity, one might ask whether there exists a natural number <math>m</math> such that {{tmath|1= \lim_{z \rightarrow a}(z-a)^{m+1}f(z)=0 }}. If so, <math>a</math> is called a '''[[pole (complex analysis)|pole]]''' of <math>f</math> and the smallest such <math>m</math> is the '''order''' of {{tmath| a }}. So removable singularities are precisely the [[pole (complex analysis)|pole]]s of order {{tmath| 0 }}. A [[Meromorphic function|meromorphic]] function blows up uniformly near its other poles.
# If an isolated singularity <math>a</math> of <math>f</math> is neither removable nor a pole, it is called an '''[[essential singularity]]'''.  The [[Picard Theorem|Great Picard Theorem]] shows that such an <math>f</math> maps every punctured open neighborhood <math>U \smallsetminus \{a\}</math> to the entire complex plane, with the possible exception of at most one point.


#In light of Riemann's theorem, given a non-removable singularity, one might ask whether there exists a natural number <math>m</math> such that <math>\lim_{z \rightarrow a}(z-a)^{m+1}f(z)=0</math>. If so, <math>a</math> is called a '''[[pole (complex analysis)|pole]]''' of <math>f</math> and the smallest such <math>m</math> is the '''order''' of <math>a</math>. So removable singularities are precisely the [[pole (complex analysis)|pole]]s of order 0. A [[Meromorphic function|meromorphic]] function blows up uniformly near its other poles.
== See also ==
#If an isolated singularity <math>a</math> of <math>f</math> is neither removable nor a pole, it is called an '''[[essential singularity]]'''.  The [[Picard Theorem|Great Picard Theorem]] shows that such an <math>f</math> maps every punctured open neighborhood <math>U \setminus \{a\}</math> to the entire complex plane, with the possible exception of at most one point.
 
==See also==
* [[Analytic capacity]]
* [[Analytic capacity]]
* [[Removable discontinuity]]
* [[Removable discontinuity]]


== External links ==
== External links ==
*[https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Removable_singular_point Removable singular point] at [http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/ Encyclopedia of Mathematics] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121220135247/http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/ |date=2012-12-20 }}
* [https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Removable_singular_point Removable singular point] at [http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/ Encyclopedia of Mathematics] {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20121220135247/http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/ |date=2012-12-20 }}
 
[[Category:Analytic functions]]
[[Category:Analytic functions]]
[[Category:Meromorphic functions]]
[[Category:Meromorphic functions]]
[[Category:Bernhard Riemann]]
[[Category:Bernhard Riemann]]

Latest revision as of 21:14, 14 December 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

File:Graph of x squared undefined at x equals 2.svg
A graph of a parabola with a removable singularity at x = 2Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

In complex analysis, a removable singularity of a holomorphic function is a point at which the function is undefined, but it is possible to redefine the function at that point in such a way that the resulting function is regular in a neighbourhood of that point.

For instance, the (unnormalized) sinc function, as defined by

sinc(z)=sinzz

has a singularity at Template:Tmath. This singularity can be removed by defining Template:Tmath, which is the limit of sincScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". as Template:Tmath tends to Template:Tmath. The resulting function is holomorphic. In this case the problem was caused by sincScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". being given an indeterminate form. Taking a power series expansion for Template:Tmath around the singular point shows that

sinc(z)=1z(k=0(1)kz2k+1(2k+1)!)=k=0(1)kz2k(2k+1)!=1z23!+z45!z67!+.

Formally, if U is an open subset of the complex plane Template:Tmath, aU a point of Template:Tmath, and f:U{a} is a holomorphic function, then a is called a removable singularity for f if there exists a holomorphic function g:U which coincides with f on Template:Tmath. We say f is holomorphically extendable over U if such a g exists.

Riemann's theorem

Riemann's theorem on removable singularities is as follows:

Template:Math theorem

The implications 1 ⇒ 2 ⇒ 3 ⇒ 4 are trivial. To prove 4 ⇒ 1, we first recall that the holomorphy of a function at a is equivalent to it being analytic at a (proof), i.e. having a power series representation. Define

h(z)={(za)2f(z)za,0z=a.

Clearly, Template:Tmath is holomorphic on Template:Tmath, and there exists

h(a)=limza(za)2f(z)0za=limza(za)f(z)=0

by 4, hence Template:Tmath is holomorphic on Template:Tmath and has a Taylor series about Template:Tmath:

h(z)=c0+c1(za)+c2(za)2+c3(za)3+.

We have Template:Tmath and Template:Tmath; therefore

h(z)=c2(za)2+c3(za)3+.

Hence, where Template:Tmath, we have:

f(z)=h(z)(za)2=c2+c3(za)+.

However,

g(z)=c2+c3(za)+.

is holomorphic on Template:Tmath, thus an extension of Template:Tmath.

Other kinds of singularities

Unlike functions of a real variable, holomorphic functions are sufficiently rigid that their isolated singularities can be completely classified. A holomorphic function's singularity is either not really a singularity at all, i.e. a removable singularity, or one of the following two types:

  1. In light of Riemann's theorem, given a non-removable singularity, one might ask whether there exists a natural number m such that Template:Tmath. If so, a is called a pole of f and the smallest such m is the order of Template:Tmath. So removable singularities are precisely the poles of order Template:Tmath. A meromorphic function blows up uniformly near its other poles.
  2. If an isolated singularity a of f is neither removable nor a pole, it is called an essential singularity. The Great Picard Theorem shows that such an f maps every punctured open neighborhood U{a} to the entire complex plane, with the possible exception of at most one point.

See also

External links