Classical Kuiper belt object: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jessicapierce
m Undid nonconstructive edit.
 
imported>IapetusCallistus
m Changed the word pink into magenta to accurately describe the image.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Kuiper belt object, not controlled by an orbital resonance with Neptune}}
{{Short description|Kuiper belt object, not controlled by an orbital resonance with Neptune}}
[[File:UltimaThule_CA06_color_20190516.png|thumb|[[486958 Arrokoth]], the first classical Kuiper belt object [[List of minor planets visited by spacecraft|visited by a spacecraft]].]]
[[File:UltimaThule_CA06_color_20190516.png|thumb|[[486958 Arrokoth]], the first classical Kuiper belt object [[List of minor planets visited by spacecraft|visited by a spacecraft]].]]
[[File:Cubewanos.png|thumb|The orbits of various cubewanos compared to the orbit of [[Neptune]] (blue) and [[Pluto]] (pink)]]
[[File:Cubewanos.png|thumb|The orbits of various cubewanos compared to the orbit of [[Neptune]] (blue) and [[Pluto]] (magenta)]]
{{TNO}}
{{TNO}}


Line 9: Line 9:


Objects identified as cubewanos include:
Objects identified as cubewanos include:
* [[15760 Albion]]<ref name=K10B62 /> (aka {{mp|1992 QB|1}} and gave rise to term 'Cubewano')
* [[15760 Albion]]<ref name=K10B62 /> (aka {{mp|1992 QB|1}} and gave rise to the term "Cubewano")
* [[Makemake|136472 Makemake]], the largest known cubewano{{Citation needed|reason=This conflicts with the main page for Makemake, which claims that Makemake is the second largest cubewano.|date=January 2024}} and a [[dwarf planet]]<ref name=K10B62 />  
* [[Makemake]], a [[dwarf planet]]<ref name=K10B62 />  
* [[50000 Quaoar]] and [[20000 Varuna]], each considered the largest TNO at the time of discovery<ref name=K10B62 />  
* [[Quaoar (dwarf planet)|Quaoar]] and [[20000 Varuna]], each considered the largest TNO at the time of discovery<ref name=K10B62 />  
* [[19521 Chaos]], [[58534 Logos]], [[53311 Deucalion]], [[66652 Borasisi]], [[88611 Teharonhiawako]]
* [[19521 Chaos]], [[58534 Logos]], [[53311 Deucalion]], [[66652 Borasisi]], [[88611 Teharonhiawako]]
* {{mpl|(33001) 1997 CU|29}}, {{mpl|(55636) 2002 TX|300}}, {{mpl|(55565) 2002 AW|197}}, {{mpl|(55637) 2002 UX|25}}
* {{mpl|(33001) 1997 CU|29}}, {{mpl|(55636) 2002 TX|300}}, [[55565 Aya]], [[55637 Uni]]
* [[486958 Arrokoth]]
* [[486958 Arrokoth]]


[[Haumea|136108 Haumea]] was provisionally listed as a cubewano by the [[Minor Planet Center]] in 2006,<ref name=K06X45>{{cite web |date=2006-12-12 |title=MPEC 2006-X45: Distant Minor Planets |url=https://minorplanetcenter.net//mpec/K06/K06X45.html |access-date=2008-10-03 |df=dmy-all |publisher=IAU Minor Planet Center & Tamkin Foundation Computer Network}}</ref> but was later found to be in a [[resonant trans-Neptunian object|resonant]] orbit.<ref name=K10B62>
[[Haumea]] was provisionally listed as a cubewano by the [[Minor Planet Center]] in 2006,<ref name=K06X45>{{cite web |date=2006-12-12 |title=MPEC 2006-X45: Distant Minor Planets |url=https://minorplanetcenter.net//mpec/K06/K06X45.html |access-date=2008-10-03 |df=dmy-all |publisher=IAU Minor Planet Center & Tamkin Foundation Computer Network}}</ref> but was later found to be in a [[resonant trans-Neptunian object|resonant]] orbit.<ref name=K10B62>
{{cite web |date=2010-01-30 |title=MPEC 2010-B62: Distant Minor Planets (2010 FEB. 13.0 TT) |author=Brian G. Marsden |department=IAU Minor Planet Center |publisher=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/mpec/K10/K10B62.html |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120904012403/http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/mpec/K10/K10B62.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-09-04 |df=dmy-all |access-date=2010-07-26}}</ref>
{{cite web |date=2010-01-30 |title=MPEC 2010-B62: Distant Minor Planets (2010 FEB. 13.0 TT) |author=Brian G. Marsden |department=IAU Minor Planet Center |publisher=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/mpec/K10/K10B62.html |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120904012403/http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/mpec/K10/K10B62.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-09-04 |df=dmy-all |access-date=2010-07-26}}</ref>


== {{vanchor|Orbits 'hot' and 'cold' populations}} ==
== Orbits: 'hot' and 'cold' populations ==
[[File:TheKuiperBelt 55AU Classical.svg|thumb|300px|[[Semimajor axis]] and [[orbital inclination|inclination]] of cubewanos (blue) compared to [[Resonant trans-Neptunian object|resonant TNOs]] (red).]]
 
There are two basic dynamical classes of classical Kuiper-belt bodies: those with relatively unperturbed ('cold') orbits, and those with markedly perturbed ('hot') orbits.
There are two basic dynamical classes of classical Kuiper-belt bodies: those with relatively unperturbed ('cold') orbits, and those with markedly perturbed ('hot') orbits.


Most cubewanos are found between the 2:3 [[orbital resonance]] with Neptune (populated by [[plutino]]s) and the 1:2 resonance. [[50000 Quaoar]], for example, has a near-circular orbit close to the [[ecliptic]]. Plutinos, on the other hand, have more eccentric orbits bringing some of them closer to the Sun than [[Neptune]].
Most cubewanos are found between the 2:3 [[orbital resonance]] with Neptune (populated by [[plutino]]s) and the 1:2 resonance. [[50000 Quaoar]], for example, has a near-circular orbit close to the [[ecliptic]]. Plutinos, on the other hand, have more eccentric orbits bringing some of them closer to the Sun than [[Neptune]].


The majority of classical objects, the so-called ''cold population'', have low inclinations (<&thinsp;5[[Degree (angle)|°]]) and near-circular orbits, lying between 42 and 47&nbsp;AU. A smaller population (the ''hot population'') is characterised by highly inclined, more eccentric orbits.<ref name="JewittDelsanti2006">{{cite book |last1=Jewitt |first1=D. |author1-link=David Jewitt |last2=Delsanti |first2=A. |year=2006 |chapter=The Solar System Beyond The Planets |title=Solar System Update : Topical and Timely Reviews in Solar System Sciences |publisher=[[Springer (publisher)|Springer]]-[[Praxis Publishing|Praxis]] |chapter-url=http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/papers/2006/DJ06.pdf |isbn=978-3-540-26056-1 |url=http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/papers/2006/DJ06.pdf |access-date=March 2, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070129151907/http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/papers/2006/DJ06.pdf |archive-date=2007-01-29 |df=dmy-all |url-status=dead}})</ref> The terms 'hot' and 'cold' has nothing to do with surface or internal temperatures, but rather refer to the orbits of the objects, by analogy to molecules in a gas, which increase their relative velocity as they heat up.<ref name="Levison2003">{{cite journal |last1=Levison |first1=Harold F. |last2=Morbidelli |first2=Alessandro |date=2003 |title=The formation of the Kuiper belt by the outward transport of bodies during Neptune's migration |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=426 |issue=6965 |pages=419–421 |doi=10.1038/nature02120 |pmid=14647375 |bibcode=2003Natur.426..419L|s2cid=4395099 }}</ref>
The majority of classical objects, the so-called ''cold population'', have low inclinations (< 5[[Degree (angle)|°]]) and near-circular orbits, lying between 42 and 47&nbsp;AU. A smaller population (the ''hot population'') is characterised by highly inclined, more eccentric orbits.<ref name="JewittDelsanti2006">{{cite book |last1=Jewitt |first1=D. |author1-link=David Jewitt |last2=Delsanti |first2=A. |year=2006 |chapter=The Solar System Beyond The Planets |title=Solar System Update : Topical and Timely Reviews in Solar System Sciences |publisher=[[Springer (publisher)|Springer]]-[[Praxis Publishing|Praxis]] |chapter-url=http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/papers/2006/DJ06.pdf |isbn=978-3-540-26056-1 |url=http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/papers/2006/DJ06.pdf |access-date=March 2, 2006 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070129151907/http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/papers/2006/DJ06.pdf |archive-date=2007-01-29 |df=dmy-all |url-status=dead}})</ref> The terms 'hot' and 'cold' has nothing to do with surface or internal temperatures, but rather refer to the orbits of the objects, by analogy to molecules in a gas, which increase their relative velocity as they heat up.<ref name="Levison2003">{{cite journal |last1=Levison |first1=Harold F. |last2=Morbidelli |first2=Alessandro |date=2003 |title=The formation of the Kuiper belt by the outward transport of bodies during Neptune's migration |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |volume=426 |issue=6965 |pages=419–421 |doi=10.1038/nature02120 |pmid=14647375 |bibcode=2003Natur.426..419L|s2cid=4395099 }}</ref>


The [[Deep Ecliptic Survey]] reports the distributions of the two populations; one with the inclination centered at 4.6° (named ''Core'') and another with inclinations extending beyond 30° (''Halo'').<ref name="DES_Elliot2006">
The [[Deep Ecliptic Survey]] reports the distributions of the two populations; one with the inclination centered at 4.6° (named ''Core'') and another with inclinations extending beyond 30° (''Halo'').<ref name="DES_Elliot2006">
{{cite journal |author=J. L. Elliot |year=2006 |title=The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population |journal=[[Astronomical Journal]] |volume=129 |issue=2 |pages=1117–1162 |bibcode=2005AJ....129.1117E |doi=10.1086/427395 |display-authors=etal|doi-access=free }} ({{cite web |url=http://alpaca.as.arizona.edu/~trilling/des2.pdf |title=Preprint |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060823112517/http://alpaca.as.arizona.edu/~trilling/des2.pdf |archive-date=2006-08-23 |df=dmy-all}})</ref>
{{cite journal |author=J. L. Elliot |year=2006 |title=The Deep Ecliptic Survey: A Search for Kuiper Belt Objects and Centaurs. II. Dynamical Classification, the Kuiper Belt Plane, and the Core Population |journal=[[Astronomical Journal]] |volume=129 |issue=2 |pages=1117–1162 |bibcode=2005AJ....129.1117E |doi=10.1086/427395 |display-authors=etal|doi-access=free }} ({{cite web |url=http://alpaca.as.arizona.edu/~trilling/des2.pdf |title=Preprint |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060823112517/http://alpaca.as.arizona.edu/~trilling/des2.pdf |archive-date=2006-08-23 |df=dmy-all}})</ref>
[[File:Kuiper-belt-inclination.svg|thumb|600px|center|[[Semi-major axis]] and [[orbital inclination|inclination]] of Kuiper Belt objects, with cold classical KBOs (blue), hot classical KBOs (light blue), [[Plutino|plutinos]] (orange), and [[Resonant trans-Neptunian object|resonant KBOs]] (red). The [[Haumea family]] is additionally highlighted in slate blue.]]


=== Distribution ===
=== Distribution ===
The vast majority of KBOs (more than two-thirds) have inclinations of less than 5° and eccentricities of less than 0.1&nbsp;. Their semi-major axes show a preference for the middle of the main belt; arguably, smaller objects close to the limiting resonances have been either captured into resonance or have their orbits modified by Neptune.
The vast majority of KBOs (more than two-thirds) have inclinations of less than 5° and eccentricities of less than 0.1&nbsp;. Their semi-major axes show a preference for the middle of the main belt; arguably, smaller objects close to the limiting resonances have been either captured into resonance or have their orbits modified by Neptune.


The 'hot' and 'cold' populations are strikingly different: more than 30% of all cubewanos are in low inclination, near-circular orbits. The parameters of the plutinos’ orbits are more evenly distributed, with a local maximum in moderate eccentricities in 0.15–0.2 range, and low inclinations 5–10°.
The 'hot' and 'cold' populations are strikingly different: more than 30% of all cubewanos are in low inclination, near-circular orbits. The parameters of the plutinos' orbits are more evenly distributed, with a local maximum in moderate eccentricities in 0.15–0.2 range, and low inclinations 5–10°.
See also the comparison with [[scattered disk#Scattered objects versus classical objects|scattered disk objects]].
See also the comparison with [[scattered disk#Scattered objects versus classical objects|scattered disk objects]].


Line 94: Line 94:
[[File:2014 MU69 orbit.jpg|thumb|New Horizons trajectory and the orbits of Pluto and 486958 Arrokoth]]
[[File:2014 MU69 orbit.jpg|thumb|New Horizons trajectory and the orbits of Pluto and 486958 Arrokoth]]


As of January 2019, only one classical Kuiper belt object has been observed up close by spacecraft. Both [[Voyager program|Voyager spacecraft]] have passed through the region before the discovery of the Kuiper belt.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/PI-Perspectives.php?page=piPerspective_02_28_2018 |title=The PI's Perspective: Why Didn't Voyager Explore the Kuiper Belt? |date=28 February 2018 |first=Alan |last=Stern |access-date=13 March 2018}}</ref> [[New Horizons]] was the first mission to visit a classical KBO. After its successful exploration of the [[Pluto]] system in 2015, the [[NASA]] spacecraft has visited the small KBO 486958 Arrokoth at a distance of {{convert|3500|km|mi}} on 1&nbsp;January 2019.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2018/0124-new-horizons-prepares-for-2014mu69.html |title=New Horizons prepares for encounter with 2014&nbsp;MU69 |first=Emily |last=Lakdawalla |publisher=Planetary Society |date=24 January 2018 |access-date=13 March 2018}}</ref>
As of January 2019, only one classical Kuiper belt object has been observed up close by spacecraft. Both [[Voyager program|Voyager spacecraft]] have passed through the region before the discovery of the Kuiper belt.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/PI-Perspectives.php?page=piPerspective_02_28_2018 |title=The PI's Perspective: Why Didn't Voyager Explore the Kuiper Belt? |date=28 February 2018 |first=Alan |last=Stern |access-date=13 March 2018}}</ref> [[New Horizons]] was the first mission to visit a classical KBO. After its successful exploration of the [[Pluto]] system in 2015, the [[NASA]] spacecraft has visited the small KBO 486958 Arrokoth at a distance of {{convert|3500|km|mi}} on 1&nbsp;January 2019.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2018/0124-new-horizons-prepares-for-2014mu69.html |title=New Horizons prepares for encounter with 2014&nbsp;MU69 |first=Emily |last=Lakdawalla |publisher=Planetary Society |date=24 January 2018 |access-date=13 March 2018}}</ref>


== List ==
== List ==
Line 103: Line 103:
* [[15760 Albion]]
* [[15760 Albion]]
* [[20000 Varuna]]
* [[20000 Varuna]]
* {{mpl|(307261) 2002 MS|4}}
* [[307261 Máni]]
* {{mpl|(307616) 2003 QW|90}}
* {{mpl|(307616) 2003 QW|90}}
* {{mpl|(444030) 2004 NT|33}}
* {{mpl|(444030) 2004 NT|33}}
Line 111: Line 111:
* [[120347 Salacia]]
* [[120347 Salacia]]
* {{mpl|(144897) 2004 UX|10}}
* {{mpl|(144897) 2004 UX|10}}
* {{mpl|(145452) 2005 RN|43}}
* [[145452 Ritona]]
* {{mpl|(145453) 2005 RR|43}}
* {{mpl|(145453) 2005 RR|43}}
* [[148780 Altjira]]
* [[148780 Altjira]]
Line 125: Line 125:
* {{mpl|(33001) 1997 CU|29}}
* {{mpl|(33001) 1997 CU|29}}
* [[486958 Arrokoth]]
* [[486958 Arrokoth]]
* [[50000 Quaoar]]
* [[Quaoar (dwarf planet)|Quaoar]]
* {{mpl|(52747) 1998 HM|151}}
* {{mpl|(52747) 1998 HM|151}}
* [[53311 Deucalion]]
* [[53311 Deucalion]]
* {{mpl|(55565) 2002 AW|197}}
* [[55565 Aya]]
* {{mpl|(55636) 2002 TX|300}}
* {{mpl|(55636) 2002 TX|300}}
* {{mpl|(55637) 2002 UX|25}}
* [[55637 Uni]]
* [[58534 Logos]]
* [[58534 Logos]]
* [[66652 Borasisi]]
* [[66652 Borasisi]]
Line 140: Line 140:
* {{mpl|(86047) 1999 OY|3}}
* {{mpl|(86047) 1999 OY|3}}
* [[88611 Teharonhiawako]]
* [[88611 Teharonhiawako]]
* {{mpl|(90568) 2004 GV|9}}
* [[90568 Goibniu]]
{{Colend}}
{{Colend}}


Line 157: Line 157:
*{{cite web |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/ekonews/ |title=The Kuiper Belt Electronic Newsletter}}
*{{cite web |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/ekonews/ |title=The Kuiper Belt Electronic Newsletter}}
*{{citation |department=IAU Minor Planet Center |publisher=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/lists/TNOs.html |website=minorplanetcenter.org |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100827234817/http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/lists/TNOs.html |archive-date=2010-08-27 |df=dmy-all |title=List of Trans-Neptunian objects}}
*{{citation |department=IAU Minor Planet Center |publisher=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/lists/TNOs.html |website=minorplanetcenter.org |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100827234817/http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/lists/TNOs.html |archive-date=2010-08-27 |df=dmy-all |title=List of Trans-Neptunian objects}}
*{{cite web |title=TNO pages |url=http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/tnos.html |website=johnstonarchive.net}}
*{{cite web |title=TNO pages |url=https://www.johnstonsarchive.net/astro/tnos.html |website=johnstonarchive.net}}
*{{cite web |title=Plot of the current positions of bodies in the Outer Solar System |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/lists/OuterPlot.html |website=minorplanetcenter.org |department=IAU Minor Planet Center |publisher=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics }}
*{{cite web |title=Plot of the current positions of bodies in the Outer Solar System |url=http://www.minorplanetcenter.org/iau/lists/OuterPlot.html |website=minorplanetcenter.org |department=IAU Minor Planet Center |publisher=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics }}



Latest revision as of 14:19, 19 November 2025

Template:Short description

File:UltimaThule CA06 color 20190516.png
486958 Arrokoth, the first classical Kuiper belt object visited by a spacecraft.
File:Cubewanos.png
The orbits of various cubewanos compared to the orbit of Neptune (blue) and Pluto (magenta)

Template:TNO

A classical Kuiper belt object, also called a cubewano (Template:IPAc-en "QB1-o"),Template:Efn is a low-eccentricity Kuiper belt object (KBO) that orbits beyond Neptune and is not controlled by an orbital resonance with Neptune. Cubewanos have orbits with semi-major axes in the 40–50 AU range and, unlike Pluto, do not cross Neptune's orbit. That is, they have low-eccentricity and sometimes low-inclination orbits like the classical planets.

The name "cubewano" derives from the first trans-Neptunian object (TNO) found after Pluto and Charon: 15760 Albion, which until January 2018 had only the provisional designation (15760) Template:Mp.[1] Similar objects found later were often called "QB1-os", or "cubewanos", after this object, though the term "classical" is much more frequently used in the scientific literature.

Objects identified as cubewanos include:

Haumea was provisionally listed as a cubewano by the Minor Planet Center in 2006,[3] but was later found to be in a resonant orbit.[2]

Orbits: 'hot' and 'cold' populations

There are two basic dynamical classes of classical Kuiper-belt bodies: those with relatively unperturbed ('cold') orbits, and those with markedly perturbed ('hot') orbits.

Most cubewanos are found between the 2:3 orbital resonance with Neptune (populated by plutinos) and the 1:2 resonance. 50000 Quaoar, for example, has a near-circular orbit close to the ecliptic. Plutinos, on the other hand, have more eccentric orbits bringing some of them closer to the Sun than Neptune.

The majority of classical objects, the so-called cold population, have low inclinations (< 5°) and near-circular orbits, lying between 42 and 47 AU. A smaller population (the hot population) is characterised by highly inclined, more eccentric orbits.[4] The terms 'hot' and 'cold' has nothing to do with surface or internal temperatures, but rather refer to the orbits of the objects, by analogy to molecules in a gas, which increase their relative velocity as they heat up.[5]

The Deep Ecliptic Survey reports the distributions of the two populations; one with the inclination centered at 4.6° (named Core) and another with inclinations extending beyond 30° (Halo).[6]

File:Kuiper-belt-inclination.svg
Semi-major axis and inclination of Kuiper Belt objects, with cold classical KBOs (blue), hot classical KBOs (light blue), plutinos (orange), and resonant KBOs (red). The Haumea family is additionally highlighted in slate blue.

Distribution

The vast majority of KBOs (more than two-thirds) have inclinations of less than 5° and eccentricities of less than 0.1 . Their semi-major axes show a preference for the middle of the main belt; arguably, smaller objects close to the limiting resonances have been either captured into resonance or have their orbits modified by Neptune.

The 'hot' and 'cold' populations are strikingly different: more than 30% of all cubewanos are in low inclination, near-circular orbits. The parameters of the plutinos' orbits are more evenly distributed, with a local maximum in moderate eccentricities in 0.15–0.2 range, and low inclinations 5–10°. See also the comparison with scattered disk objects.

Cubewanos form a clear 'belt' outside Neptune's orbit, whereas the plutinos approach, or even cross Neptune's orbit. When orbital inclinations are compared, 'hot' cubewanos can be easily distinguished by their higher inclinations, as the plutinos typically keep orbits <20°. The high inclination of 'hot' cubewanos has not been explained.[7]

Template:Multiple image

Cold and hot populations: physical characteristics

In addition to the distinct orbital characteristics, the two populations display different physical characteristics.

The difference in colour between the red cold population, such as 486958 Arrokoth, and more heterogeneous hot population was observed as early as in 2002.[8] Recent studies, based on a larger data set, indicate the cut-off inclination of 12° (instead of 5°) between the cold and hot populations and confirm the distinction between the homogenous red cold population and the bluish hot population.[9]

Another difference between the low-inclination (cold) and high-inclination (hot) classical objects is the observed number of binary objects. Binaries are quite common on low-inclination orbits and are typically similar-brightness systems. Binaries are less common on high-inclination orbits and their components typically differ in brightness. This correlation, together with the differences in colour, support further the suggestion that the currently observed classical objects belong to at least two different overlapping populations, with different physical properties and orbital history.[10]

Toward a formal definition

There is no official definition of 'cubewano' or 'classical KBO'. However, the terms are normally used to refer to objects free from significant perturbation from Neptune, thereby excluding KBOs in orbital resonance with Neptune (resonant trans-Neptunian objects). The Minor Planet Center (MPC) and the Deep Ecliptic Survey (DES) do not list cubewanos (classical objects) using the same criteria. Many TNOs classified as cubewanos by the MPC, such as dwarf planet Makemake, are classified as ScatNear (possibly scattered by Neptune) by the DES. Template:Mpl may be an inner cubewano near the plutinos. Furthermore, there is evidence that the Kuiper belt has an 'edge', in that an apparent lack of low-inclination objects beyond 47–49 AU was suspected as early as 1998 and shown with more data in 2001.[11] Consequently, the traditional usage of the terms is based on the orbit's semi-major axis, and includes objects situated between the 2:3 and 1:2 resonances, that is between 39.4 and 47.8 AU (with exclusion of these resonances and the minor ones in-between).[4]

These definitions lack precision: in particular the boundary between the classical objects and the scattered disk remains blurred. Template:Asof, there are 870 objects with perihelion (q) > 40 AU and aphelion (Q) < 48 AU.[12]

DES classification

Introduced by the report from the Deep Ecliptic Survey by J. L. Elliott et al. in 2005 uses formal criteria based on the mean orbital parameters.[6] Put informally, the definition includes the objects that have never crossed the orbit of Neptune. According to this definition, an object qualifies as a classical KBO if:

SSBN07 classification

An alternative classification, introduced by B. Gladman, B. Marsden and C. van Laerhoven in 2007, uses a 10-million-year orbit integration instead of the Tisserand's parameter. Classical objects are defined as not resonant and not being currently scattered by Neptune.[13]

Formally, this definition includes as classical all objects with their current orbits that

  • are non-resonant (see the definition of the method)
  • have a semi-major axis greater than that of Neptune (30.1 AU; i.e. excluding centaurs) but less than 2000 AU (to exclude inner-Oort-cloud objects)
  • are not being scattered by Neptune
  • have their eccentricity e<0.240 (to exclude detached objects)

Unlike other schemes, this definition includes the objects with major semi-axis less than 39.4 AU (2:3 resonance)—termed inner classical belt, or more than 48.7 (1:2 resonance) – termed outer classical belt, and reserves the term main classical belt for the orbits between these two resonances.[13]

Families

The first known collisional family in the classical Kuiper belt—a group of objects thought to be remnants from the breakup of a single body—is the Haumea family.[14] It includes Haumea, its moons, Template:Mpl and seven smaller bodies.Template:Efn The objects not only follow similar orbits but also share similar physical characteristics. Unlike many other KBO their surface contains large amounts of water ice (H2O) and no or very little tholins.[15] The surface composition is inferred from their neutral (as opposed to red) colour and deep absorption at 1.5 and 2. μm in infrared spectrum.[16] Several other collisional families might reside in the classical Kuiper belt.[17][18]

Exploration

File:2014 MU69 orbit.jpg
New Horizons trajectory and the orbits of Pluto and 486958 Arrokoth

As of January 2019, only one classical Kuiper belt object has been observed up close by spacecraft. Both Voyager spacecraft have passed through the region before the discovery of the Kuiper belt.[19] New Horizons was the first mission to visit a classical KBO. After its successful exploration of the Pluto system in 2015, the NASA spacecraft has visited the small KBO 486958 Arrokoth at a distance of Template:Convert on 1 January 2019.[20]

List

Script error: No such module "Main list".

Here is a very generic list of classical Kuiper belt objects. Template:As of, there are about 870 objects with q > 40 AU and Q < 48 AU.[12] Template:Colbegin

Template:Colend

See also

Footnotes

Template:Notelist

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Commonscat

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".


Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Portal bar

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b c d Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".)
  5. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  6. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". (Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".)
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".