Book of Revelation: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Added citation.
 
imported>DivermanAU
add Wikisource link
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
}}
}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2019}}
[[File:Papyrus 47 Rev 13,16-14.4.jpg|thumb|Revelation 13:16–14:4 on [[Papyrus 47]] (''recto''; {{circa|250 AD}}){{sfn|Aland|Aland|1995|page=159}}]]
<!-- IMPORTANT: The following image provides an example of a Category I manuscript in the Gregory–Aland numbering system. Its placement affects what is displayed as the thumbnail for inbound wikilinks and Wikipedia search bar results, and matches all other New Testament book articles. -->[[File:Dublin, Chester Beatty Ms Chester Beatty III Papyrus 47 fol. 7r Rev 13,16-14.jpg|thumb|Revelation 13:16–14:4 on [[Papyrus 47]] (''recto''; {{circa|250 AD}}){{sfn|Aland|Aland|1995|page=159}}]]
{{Books of the New Testament}}
{{Books of the New Testament}}
{{John}}
{{John}}
{{Christian Eschatology}}
{{Christian Eschatology}}


The '''Book of Revelation''', also known as the '''Book of the Apocalypse''' or the '''Apocalypse of John''',{{Sfn|Eusebius|1904|loc=[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.viii.xxv.html 3.25.3-5]}} is the final book of the [[New Testament]], and therefore the final book of the [[Bible#Christian Bible|Christian Bible]]. Written in [[Greek language|Greek]], its title is derived from the [[Incipit|first word]] of the text, ''apocalypse'' ({{langx|grc-x-koine|ἀποκάλυψις}}, translit. ''apokálypsis''), which means "revelation" or "unveiling".{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} The Book of Revelation is the only [[Apocalyptic literature|apocalyptic book]] in the [[Development of the New Testament canon|New Testament canon]].{{Efn|Other [[Apocalyptic literature|apocalyptic texts]] popular in the [[Early Christianity|early Christian era]] did not achieve canonical status.{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} [[2 Esdras]] (otherwise known as the "Apocalypse of Ezra") is recognized as a canonical book in the [[Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church|Ethiopian Orthodox]] [[Orthodox Tewahedo biblical canon|biblical canon]], but as part of the [[Old Testament]].}} It occupies a central place in [[Christian eschatology]].{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}}
The '''Book of Revelation''', also known as the '''Book of the Apocalypse''' or the '''Apocalypse of John''',{{Sfn|Eusebius|1904|loc=[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.viii.xxv.html 3.25.3-5]}} is canonically the last book of the [[New Testament]]. Written in [[Greek language|Greek]], its title is derived from the [[Incipit|first word]] of the text, ''apocalypse'' ({{langx|grc-x-koine|ἀποκάλυψις|apokálypsis}}), which means "revelation" or "unveiling".{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} The Book of Revelation is the only [[Apocalyptic literature|apocalyptic book]] in the [[Development of the New Testament canon|New Testament canon]],{{Efn|Other [[Apocalyptic literature|apocalyptic texts]] popular in the [[Early Christianity|early Christian era]] did not achieve canonical status.{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} [[2 Esdras]] (otherwise known as the "Apocalypse of Ezra") is recognized as a part of the [[Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church|Ethiopian Orthodox]] [[Orthodox Tewahedo biblical canon|biblical canon]], but in the [[Old Testament]].}} and occupies a central place in [[Christian eschatology]].{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}}


The book spans three literary genres: the [[Letter (message)|epistolary]], the [[Apocalyptic literature|apocalyptic]], and the [[prophetic]].{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|p=1536}} It begins with John, on the island of [[Patmos]] in the [[Aegean Sea]], addressing letters to the "[[Seven Churches of Asia]]" with exhortations from Christ.{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} He then describes a series of prophetic and symbolic [[Vision (spirituality)|visions]],{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} including figures such as a [[Woman clothed with the sun]] with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars, [[Serpents in the Bible#Ancient serpent|the Serpent]], the Seven-Headed Dragon, and [[The Beast (Revelation)|the Beast]], which culminate in the [[Second Coming]] of [[Jesus Christ]].{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}
The book spans three literary genres: the [[Letter (message)|epistolary]], the [[Apocalyptic literature|apocalyptic]], and the [[prophetic]].{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|p=1536}} It begins with John, on the island of [[Patmos]] in the [[Aegean Sea]], addressing letters to the "[[Seven Churches of Asia]]" with exhortations from Christ.{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} He then describes a series of prophetic and symbolic [[Vision (spirituality)|visions]], which would culminate in the [[Second Coming]] of [[Jesus Christ]].{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} These visions include figures such as a [[Woman clothed with the sun]] with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars, [[Serpents in the Bible#Ancient serpent|the Serpent]], the Seven-Headed Dragon, and [[The Beast (Revelation)|the Beast]].{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}


The author names himself as simply "John" in the text,{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} but his precise identity remains a point of [[Authorship of the Johannine works|academic debate]].{{efn|Second–third century [[early Christian writers]] such as [[Papias of Hierapolis]], [[Justin Martyr]], [[Hippolytus of Rome]], [[Irenaeus]], [[Melito of Sardis]], [[Clement of Alexandria]], [[Origen]], [[Victorinus of Pettau]], and the author of the [[Muratorian fragment]] identify [[John the Apostle]] as the John of Revelation.{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}{{sfn|Carson|2005|page=465ff}}{{sfn|Holmes|2007|page=749ff}} Modern [[Biblical studies|biblical scholarship]] generally takes a different view,{{sfn|Collins|1984|p=28}} with many considering that nothing can be known about the author except that he was a [[Prophets in Christianity|Christian prophet]].{{sfn|Bauckham|1993|p=2}} In order to make a distinction between the two Johns, contemporary [[Christian theology|Christian theologians]] characterize the Book of Revelation's author as "[[John of Patmos]]".{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}} The bulk of [[Patristics|Patristic writers]], which constitute the [[Sacred tradition|earliest tradition]] of the [[Christian Church]], date the book to the reign of the [[Roman Emperor]] [[Domitian]] (81–96 AD),{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}} which evidence tends to confirm.{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|pp=1535–1536}}}} The sometimes obscure and extravagant imagery of Revelation, with many allusions and numeric symbolism derived from the [[Old Testament]], has allowed a wide variety of Christian interpretations throughout the [[history of Christianity]].{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}
The author names himself as simply "John" in the text,{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} but his precise identity remains a point of [[Authorship of the Johannine works|academic debate]].{{efn|Second–third century [[early Christian writers]] such as [[Papias of Hierapolis]], [[Justin Martyr]], [[Hippolytus of Rome]], [[Irenaeus]], [[Melito of Sardis]], [[Clement of Alexandria]], [[Origen]], [[Victorinus of Pettau]], and the author of the [[Muratorian fragment]] identify [[John the Apostle]] as the John of Revelation.{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}{{sfn|Carson|2005|page=465ff}}{{sfn|Holmes|2007|page=749ff}} Modern [[Biblical studies|biblical scholarship]] generally takes a different view,{{sfn|Collins|1984|p=28}} with many considering that nothing can be known about the author except that he was a [[Prophets in Christianity|Christian prophet]].{{sfn|Bauckham|1993|p=2}} In order to make a distinction between the two Johns, contemporary [[Christian theology|Christian theologians]] characterize the Book of Revelation's author as "[[John of Patmos]]".{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}} The bulk of [[Patristics|Patristic writers]], which constitute the [[Sacred tradition|earliest tradition]] of the [[Christian Church]], date the book to the reign of the [[Roman Emperor]] [[Domitian]] (81–96 AD),{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}} which evidence tends to confirm.{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|pp=1535–1536}}}} The sometimes obscure and extravagant imagery of Revelation, with many allusions and numeric symbolism derived from the [[Old Testament]], has allowed a wide variety of Christian interpretations throughout the [[history of Christianity]].{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}
Modern biblical scholarship views Revelation as a first-century apocalyptic message warning early Christian communities not to assimilate into Roman imperial culture, interpreting its vivid [[symbol]]ism through historical, literary, and cultural lenses.<ref name="Brit" /><ref name=":1" /><ref name="Ehrman Apoc" />


== Composition and setting ==
== Composition and setting ==
=== Title, authorship, and date ===
=== Title, authorship, and date ===
[[File:Papyrus 18 POxy1079.jpg|thumb|Revelation 1:4–7 on [[Papyrus 18]] ({{circa|300 AD}}){{sfn|Aland|Aland|1995|page=159}}]]
[[File:London, British Library Ms Papyrus 2053 - POxy1079 (Papyrus 18) verso Revelation 1, 4–7.jpg|thumb|Revelation 1:4–7 on [[Papyrus 18]] ({{circa|300 AD}}){{sfn|Aland|Aland|1995|page=159}}]]
 
The book's most common English name is "[Book of] Revelation". It is also called "[Book of] the Apocalypse" (for example in the [[Roman Catholic Church]]),{{sfn|van den Biesen|1913}} "Revelation to John",<ref>{{cite book |year=2018 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HiPouAEACAAJ |title=ESV Pew Bible |location=[[Wheaton, Illinois]] |publisher=[[Crossway]] |isbn=978-1-4335-6343-0 |page=1028}}</ref> or "Apocalypse of St. John".<ref>{{cite web |title=What is the Book of Revelation? |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/explanation/brevelation.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230123083119/https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/explanation/brevelation.html |archive-date=January 23, 2023 |access-date=February 17, 2023 |website=PBS Frontline}}</ref> Abbreviations of these are "Rev." (traditional), "Rv" (shorter), or "Apoc."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hbl.gcc.libguides.com/c.php?g=339715&p=2285140|title=Common Abbreviations for Books of the Bible -- Chicago|via=Henry Buhl Library}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Bible Book Abbreviations |url=https://www.logos.com/bible-book-abbreviations |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220421100743/https://www.logos.com/bible-book-abbreviations |archive-date=April 21, 2022 |access-date=April 21, 2022 |website=Logos Bible Software}}</ref> These names are derived from the [[incipit]] to the text ({{Bibleverse|Revelation|1:1|NRSV}}):{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}
The book's most common English name is "[Book of] Revelation". It is also called "[Book of] the Apocalypse" (for example in the [[Roman Catholic Church]]){{sfn|van den Biesen|1913}}, "Revelation to John",<ref>{{cite book |year=2018 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HiPouAEACAAJ |title=ESV Pew Bible |location=[[Wheaton, Illinois]] |publisher=[[Crossway]] |isbn=978-1-4335-6343-0 |page=1028}}</ref> or "Apocalypse of St. John".<ref>{{cite web |title=What is the Book of Revelation? |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/explanation/brevelation.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230123083119/https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/apocalypse/explanation/brevelation.html |archive-date=January 23, 2023 |access-date=February 17, 2023 |website=PBS Frontline}}</ref> Abbreviations of these are "Rev." (traditional), "Rv" (shorter), or "Apoc."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://hbl.gcc.libguides.com/c.php?g=339715&p=2285140|title=Common Abbreviations for Books of the Bible -- Chicago|via=Henry Buhl Library}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Bible Book Abbreviations |url=https://www.logos.com/bible-book-abbreviations |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220421100743/https://www.logos.com/bible-book-abbreviations |archive-date=April 21, 2022 |access-date=April 21, 2022 |website=Logos Bible Software}}</ref> These names are derived from the [[incipit]] to the text ({{Bibleverse|Revelation|1:1|NRSV}}):{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}
{{blockquote|text=
{{blockquote|text=
{{lang|grc|Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, ἣν ἔδωκεν αὐτῷ ὁ Θεός, δεῖξαι τοῖς δούλοις αὐτοῦ ἃ δεῖ γενέσθαι ἐν τάχει, καὶ ἐσήμανεν ἀποστείλας διὰ τοῦ ἀγγέλου αὐτοῦ, τῷ δούλῳ αὐτοῦ Ἰωάνῃ.}}
{{lang|grc|Ἀποκάλυψις Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ, ἣν ἔδωκεν αὐτῷ ὁ Θεός, δεῖξαι τοῖς δούλοις αὐτοῦ ἃ δεῖ γενέσθαι ἐν τάχει, καὶ ἐσήμανεν ἀποστείλας διὰ τοῦ ἀγγέλου αὐτοῦ, τῷ δούλῳ αὐτοῦ Ἰωάνῃ.}}
Line 28: Line 29:
}}
}}


"Revelation" and "Apocalypse" are respectively a translation and an [[Anglicisation (linguistics)|anglicisation]] of the original [[Koinē Greek language|Koinē Greek]] word {{lang|grc|ἀποκάλυψις}}, which can also mean "unveiling".{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} In the [[New Testament Greek|original Greek]], the word is singular, so the name "Revelations" sometimes found in English is often considered erroneous.<ref>{{cite news |title=The Last Trumpet | work=The New York Times | date=6 April 2012 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/books/review/revelations-by-elaine-pagels.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20230217221753/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/books/review/revelations-by-elaine-pagels.html#selection-495.0-495.124 |archive-date=February 17, 2023 |access-date=February 17, 2023 | last1=Martin | first1=Dale B. }}</ref>
"Revelation" and "Apocalypse" are respectively a translation and an [[Anglicisation (linguistics)|anglicisation]] of the original [[Koinē Greek language|Koinē Greek]] word {{lang|grc|ἀποκάλυψις}}, which can also mean "unveiling".{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} In the [[New Testament Greek|original Greek]], the word is singular, so the name "Revelations" sometimes found in English is often considered erroneous.<ref name=":1">{{cite news |title=The Last Trumpet | work=The New York Times | date=6 April 2012 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/books/review/revelations-by-elaine-pagels.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://archive.today/20230217221753/https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/08/books/review/revelations-by-elaine-pagels.html#selection-495.0-495.124 |archive-date=February 17, 2023 |access-date=February 17, 2023 | last1=Martin | first1=Dale B. }}</ref>


The author names himself as simply "John" in the text,{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} and states in {{Bibleverse|Revelation|1:9|NRSV}} that he is on the island of [[Patmos]], and so he is conventionally called "[[John of Patmos]]".{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}} He was a [[Jewish Christianity|Jewish–Christian]] [[Prophets in Christianity|prophet]], probably belonging to a group of such prophets, and was accepted by the congregations to whom he addresses his letter.{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|pp= 1535–1536}}{{sfn|Bauckham|1993|pp=2–3, 24–25}} The [[New Testament canon]] has four other "[[Johannine works]]" ascribed to authors named John, and a tradition dating from [[Irenaeus]] ({{circa|130|202}} AD) identifies [[John the Apostle]] as the author of all five. The modern [[Authorship of the Johannine works|academic consensus]] is that a [[Johannine community]] produced the [[Gospel of John]] and the three [[Johannine epistles]], while John of Patmos wrote the Book of Revelation separately.{{efn|Thus, for example, whereas the 1592 [[Sixto-Clementine Vulgate]] calls the book {{lang|la|Apocalypsis Beati Joannis Apostoli}} (lit. "Apocalypse of Saint John the Apostle"), the 1979 [[Nova Vulgata]] calls it {{lang|la|Apocalypsis Joannis}} (lit. "Apocalypse of John"). }}{{sfn|Lindars|Edwards|Court|2000|p=41}}{{sfn|Collins|1984|pp=28–29}}
The author names himself as simply "John" in the text,{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} and states in {{Bibleverse|Revelation|1:9|NRSV}} that he is on the island of [[Patmos]], and so he is conventionally called "[[John of Patmos]]".{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}} He was a [[Jewish Christianity|Jewish–Christian]] [[Prophets in Christianity|prophet]], probably belonging to a group of such prophets, and was accepted by the congregations to whom he addressed his letter.{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|pp= 1535–1536}}{{sfn|Bauckham|1993|pp=2–3, 24–25}} The [[New Testament canon]] has four other "[[Johannine works]]" ascribed to authors named John, and a tradition dating from [[Irenaeus]] ({{circa|130|202}} AD) identifies [[John the Apostle]] as the author of all five. The modern [[Authorship of the Johannine works|academic consensus]] is that a [[Johannine community]] produced the [[Gospel of John]] and the three [[Johannine epistles]], while John of Patmos wrote the Book of Revelation separately.{{efn|Thus, for example, whereas the 1592 [[Sixto-Clementine Vulgate]] calls the book {{lang|la|Apocalypsis Beati Joannis Apostoli}} (lit. "Apocalypse of Saint John the Apostle"), the 1979 [[Nova Vulgata]] calls it {{lang|la|Apocalypsis Joannis}} (lit. "Apocalypse of John"). }}{{sfn|Lindars|Edwards|Court|2000|p=41}}{{sfn|Collins|1984|pp=28–29}}


The Book of Revelation is commonly dated to about 95 AD, as suggested by clues in the visions pointing to the reign of the [[Roman Emperor]] [[Domitian]] (81–96),{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}{{sfn|Perkins|2012|p=19ff}} [[The Beast (Revelation)|The Beast with seven heads]] and the [[Number of the beast|number 666]] seem to allude directly to the [[Emperor Nero]] (reigned 54–68), but this does not imply that the book was written in the 60s,{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} as there was a widespread belief in later decades that [[Nero Redivivus|Nero would return]].{{sfn|Collins|1984|p=100}}{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|pp =1535–1536}}
The Book of Revelation is commonly dated to about 95 AD, as suggested by clues in the visions pointing to the reign of the [[Roman Emperor]] [[Domitian]] (81–96),{{sfn|Boxall|2013b|pages=28-55}}{{sfn|Perkins|2012|p=19ff}} [[The Beast (Revelation)|The Beast with seven heads]] and the [[Number of the beast|number 666]] seem to allude directly to the [[Emperor Nero]] (reigned 54–68), but this does not imply that the book was written in the 60s,{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} as there was a widespread belief in later decades that [[Nero Redivivus|Nero would return]].{{sfn|Collins|1984|p=100}}{{sfn|Stuckenbruck|2003|pp =1535–1536}}
Line 44: Line 45:
[[File:Johannes op Patmos Saint John on Patmos Berlin, Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin, Gemaldegalerie HR.jpg|thumb|''[[St. John the Evangelist on Patmos]]'', painting by [[Hieronymous Bosch]], {{circa|1489}}]]
[[File:Johannes op Patmos Saint John on Patmos Berlin, Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin, Gemaldegalerie HR.jpg|thumb|''[[St. John the Evangelist on Patmos]]'', painting by [[Hieronymous Bosch]], {{circa|1489}}]]


The predominant view is that Revelation alludes to the [[Old Testament]], although it is difficult among scholars to agree on the exact number of allusions or the allusions themselves.{{sfn|Fekkes|1994|pages=61-63}} Revelation rarely quotes directly from the Old Testament, yet its composition alludes to or echoes ideas of older Hebrew scriptures.{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} Over half of the references stem from [[Book of Daniel|Daniel]], [[Book of Ezekiel|Ezekiel]], [[Book of Psalms|Psalms]], [[Book of Isaiah|Isaiah]], and [[Book of Zechariah|Zechariah]], with Daniel providing the largest number in proportion to length and Ezekiel standing out as the most influential.{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} Because these references appear as allusions rather than as quotes, it is difficult to know whether the author used the Hebrew or the Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures, but he was often influenced by the Greek.{{sfn|Beale|McDonough|2007|pp=1081–1084}}
The predominant view is that Revelation alludes to the [[Old Testament]], although it is difficult among scholars to agree on the exact number of allusions or the allusions themselves.{{sfn|Fekkes|1994|pages=61-63}} Revelation rarely quotes directly from the Old Testament, yet its composition alludes to or echoes ideas in older Hebrew scriptures.{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} Over half of the references stem from [[Book of Daniel|Daniel]], [[Book of Ezekiel|Ezekiel]], [[Book of Psalms|Psalms]], [[Book of Isaiah|Isaiah]], and [[Book of Zechariah|Zechariah]], with Daniel providing the largest number in proportion to length and Ezekiel standing out as the most influential.{{sfn|Best|2025|pages=114-236}}{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}}{{sfn|Boxall|2013a|pages=14-27}} Because these references appear as allusions rather than as quotes, it is difficult to know whether the author used the Hebrew or the Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures, but he was often influenced by the Greek.{{sfn|Beale|McDonough|2007|pp=1081–1084}}


=== Setting ===
=== Setting ===
{{Main|Historical background of the New Testament}}
{{Main|Historical background of the New Testament}}


Modern understanding has been that the Book of Revelation was written to comfort beleaguered Christians as [[Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire|they underwent religious persecution at the hands of a Roman Emperor]].{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} This is not the only interpretation, however; [[Domitian]] may not have been a cruel despot imposing the [[Roman imperial cult]] upon his subjects, and there may not have been any systematic empire-wide persecution of Christians in his time.{{sfn|Stephens|2011|pp=143–145}} Revelation may instead have been composed in the context of an existential conflict within the [[Early Christianity|early Christian communities]] of [[Asia (Roman province)|Asia Minor]] over whether to engage with, or withdraw from, the far larger non-Christian world; Mark B. Stephens argues that the Book of Revelation chastised [[State church of the Roman Empire|those Christians who wanted to reach an accommodation]] with the [[Roman Empire|Roman State]].{{sfn|Stephens|2011|p=152}} This is not to say that Christians in Asia Minor were not suffering due to withdrawal from and defiance of the wider [[Culture of ancient Rome|Roman society]], which imposed very real penalties; Revelation offered a victory over this reality by offering an apocalyptic hope. In the words of professor [[Adela Yarbro Collins|Adela Collins]], "What ought to be was experienced as a present reality."{{sfn|Collins|1984|p=154}}
Modern understanding has been that the Book of Revelation was written to comfort beleaguered Christians as [[Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire|they underwent religious persecution at the hands of a Roman Emperor]].{{sfn|Paul|2020|pages=36–58}} This is not the only interpretation, however; [[Domitian]] may not have been a cruel despot imposing the [[Roman imperial cult]] upon his subjects, and there may not have been any systematic empire-wide persecution of Christians in his time.{{sfn|Stephens|2011|pp=143–145}} Revelation may instead have been composed in the context of an existential conflict within the [[Early Christianity|early Christian communities]] of [[Asia (Roman province)|Asia Minor]] over whether to engage with, or withdraw from, the far larger non-Christian world. Mark B. Stephens argues that the Book of Revelation chastised [[State church of the Roman Empire|those Christians who wanted to reach an accommodation]] with the [[Roman Empire|Roman State]].{{sfn|Stephens|2011|p=152}} This is not to say that Christians in Asia Minor were not suffering due to withdrawal from and defiance of the wider [[Culture of ancient Rome|Roman society]], which imposed very real penalties; Revelation offered a victory over this reality by offering an apocalyptic hope. In the words of professor [[Adela Yarbro Collins]], "What ought to be was experienced as a present reality."{{sfn|Collins|1984|p=154}}{{clarify|date=July 2025}}


=== Canonical history ===
=== Canonical history ===
Line 56: Line 57:
Revelation was among the last books accepted into the [[Christian biblical canons|Christian biblical canon]], and to the present day some churches that derive from the [[Church of the East]] reject it.{{sfn|Wall|2011|p=no page number}}{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}}{{sfn|Taylor|2002|page=338. "[...] the minor [[Catholic epistles]] and Revelation continued to be omitted, and are still not included in the canon of the [[Church of the East]], which was geographically (and from the late-fifth century, doctrinally) isolated in the [[Sasanian Empire|Persian Empire]]"}} [[Eastern Christianity|Eastern Christians]] became skeptical of the book as doubts concerning its authorship and unusual style{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}}{{sfn|Pattemore|2004|p=1}} were reinforced by aversion to its acceptance by [[Montanism|Montanists]] and [[Heresy in Christianity|other groups considered to be heretical]].{{sfn|Stonehouse|n.d.|pp=138–142}} This distrust of the Book of Revelation persisted in the [[Christianity in the Middle East|Christian East]] for a long time,{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}} through the 15th century.{{sfn|Andreas of Caesarea|2011|pages=3-6}}
Revelation was among the last books accepted into the [[Christian biblical canons|Christian biblical canon]], and to the present day some churches that derive from the [[Church of the East]] reject it.{{sfn|Wall|2011|p=no page number}}{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}}{{sfn|Taylor|2002|page=338. "[...] the minor [[Catholic epistles]] and Revelation continued to be omitted, and are still not included in the canon of the [[Church of the East]], which was geographically (and from the late-fifth century, doctrinally) isolated in the [[Sasanian Empire|Persian Empire]]"}} [[Eastern Christianity|Eastern Christians]] became skeptical of the book as doubts concerning its authorship and unusual style{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}}{{sfn|Pattemore|2004|p=1}} were reinforced by aversion to its acceptance by [[Montanism|Montanists]] and [[Heresy in Christianity|other groups considered to be heretical]].{{sfn|Stonehouse|n.d.|pp=138–142}} This distrust of the Book of Revelation persisted in the [[Christianity in the Middle East|Christian East]] for a long time,{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}} through the 15th century.{{sfn|Andreas of Caesarea|2011|pages=3-6}}


[[Pope Dionysius of Alexandria|Dionysius]] ({{circa|248}}), [[List of patriarchs of Alexandria|bishop of Alexandria]] and disciple of [[Origen]], wrote that the Book of Revelation could have been written by [[Cerinthus]], although he himself did not adopt the view that Cerinthus was its writer. He regarded the Apocalypse as the work of an inspired Christian, but not of [[John the Apostle]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Eusebius of Caesarea|title=Church History, Book VII Chapter 25|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250107.htm|access-date=17 October 2016}}</ref> Similarly, [[Eusebius of Caesarea]] in his ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Church History]]'' ({{circa|330}}) argues that the Book of Revelation was accepted as a canonical book by some [[early Church Fathers]] and rejected as spurious by others at the same time.{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}}<ref>{{cite book|last1=Eusebius of Caesarea|first1=|title=Church History, Book VII Chapter 25|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250103.htm|access-date=17 October 2016}}</ref>
[[Pope Dionysius of Alexandria|Dionysius]] ({{circa|248}}), [[List of patriarchs of Alexandria|bishop of Alexandria]] and disciple of [[Origen]], wrote that the Book of Revelation could have been written by [[Cerinthus]], although he himself did not adopt the view that Cerinthus was its writer. He regarded the Apocalypse as the work of an inspired Christian, but not of [[John the Apostle]].<ref>{{cite book|last1=Eusebius of Caesarea|title=Church History, Book VII Chapter 25|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250107.htm|access-date=17 October 2016}}</ref> Similarly, [[Eusebius of Caesarea]] in his ''[[Church History (Eusebius)|Church History]]'' ({{circa|330}}) argues that the Book of Revelation was accepted as a canonical book by some [[early Church Fathers]] and rejected as spurious by others at the same time.{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}}<ref>{{cite book|last1=Eusebius of Caesarea|title=Church History, Book VII Chapter 25|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250103.htm|access-date=17 October 2016}}</ref>


The Book of Revelation is counted as both accepted and disputed, which has caused some confusion over what exactly Eusebius meant by doing so.{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}} The disputation can perhaps be attributed to [[Origen]],<ref>{{cite journal| first = ER | last = Kalin | title = Re-examining New Testament Canon History: 1. The Canon of Origen | journal = [[Currents in Theology and Mission]] | volume = 17 | year = 1990 | pages = 274–82}}</ref> which seems to have accepted it in his writings.<ref>{{cite book|author=Origen|title=Church Fathers: Commentary on John, Book V: 3 (Origen)|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/101505.htm|access-date=15 October 2017|translator=Allan Menzies}}</ref> [[Cyril of Jerusalem]] ({{circa|348}}) does not name it among the canonical books (Catechesis IV.33–36).<ref>{{cite book|last1=Cyril of Jerusalem|first1=|title=Catechetical Lecture 4 Chapter 35|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/310104.htm|access-date=12 October 2016|translator=Edwin Hamilton Gifford}}</ref> [[Athanasius of Alexandria]] ({{circa|367}}) in his ''Letter 39'',<ref>{{cite book|last1=Athanasius of Alexandria|first1=|title=Church Fathers: Letter 39 (Athanasius)|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806039.htm|access-date=14 October 2016}}</ref> [[Augustine of Hippo]] ({{circa|397}}) in his book ''[[De doctrina christiana|On Christian Doctrine]]'' (Book II, Chapter 8),<ref>{{cite book|last1=Augustine of Hippo|first1=|title=On Christian Doctrine Book II Chapter 8:2|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/12022.htm|access-date=12 October 2016}}</ref> [[Tyrannius Rufinus]] ({{circa|400}}) in his ''Commentary on the Apostles' Creed'',<ref>{{cite book|last1=Rufinus of Aquileia|first1=|title=Commentary on the Apostles' Creed #37|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2711.htm|access-date=12 October 2016}}</ref> [[Pope Innocent I]] ({{circa|405}}) in a letter to the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Toulouse|bishop of Toulouse]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bible-researcher.com/innocent.html|title=Letter of Innocent I on the Canon of Scripture|website=www.bible-researcher.com}}</ref> and [[John of Damascus]] ({{circa|730}}) in his work ''An Exposition of the Orthodox Faith'' (Book IV:7)<ref>{{cite book|last1=John of Damascus|first1=|title=An Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Book IV Chapter 17|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/33044.htm|access-date=17 October 2016|translator1=E. W. Watson|translator2=L. Pullan}}</ref> listed "the Revelation of [[John the Evangelist]]" as a canonical book.
The Book of Revelation is counted as both accepted and disputed, which has caused some confusion over what exactly Eusebius meant by doing so.{{sfn|Kyrtatas|2010|pages=29–42}} The disputation can perhaps be attributed to [[Origen]],<ref>{{cite journal| first = ER | last = Kalin | title = Re-examining New Testament Canon History: 1. The Canon of Origen | journal = [[Currents in Theology and Mission]] | volume = 17 | year = 1990 | pages = 274–82}}</ref> who seems to have accepted it in his writings.<ref>{{cite book|author=Origen|title=Church Fathers: Commentary on John, Book V: 3 (Origen)|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/101505.htm|access-date=15 October 2017|translator=Allan Menzies}}</ref> [[Cyril of Jerusalem]] ({{circa|348}}) does not name it among the canonical books (Catechesis IV.33–36).<ref>{{cite book|last1=Cyril of Jerusalem|title=Catechetical Lecture 4 Chapter 35|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/310104.htm|access-date=12 October 2016|translator=Edwin Hamilton Gifford}}</ref> [[Athanasius of Alexandria]] ({{circa|367}}) in his ''Letter 39'',<ref>{{cite book|last1=Athanasius of Alexandria|title=Church Fathers: Letter 39 (Athanasius)|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2806039.htm|access-date=14 October 2016}}</ref> [[Augustine of Hippo]] ({{circa|397}}) in his book ''[[De doctrina christiana|On Christian Doctrine]]'' (Book II, Chapter 8),<ref>{{cite book|last1=Augustine of Hippo|title=On Christian Doctrine Book II Chapter 8:2|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/12022.htm|access-date=12 October 2016}}</ref> [[Tyrannius Rufinus]] ({{circa|400}}) in his ''Commentary on the Apostles' Creed'',<ref>{{cite book|last1=Rufinus of Aquileia|title=Commentary on the Apostles' Creed #37|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2711.htm|access-date=12 October 2016}}</ref> [[Pope Innocent I]] ({{circa|405}}) in a letter to the [[Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Toulouse|bishop of Toulouse]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bible-researcher.com/innocent.html|title=Letter of Innocent I on the Canon of Scripture|website=www.bible-researcher.com}}</ref> and [[John of Damascus]] ({{circa|730}}) in his work ''An Exposition of the Orthodox Faith'' (Book IV:7)<ref>{{cite book|last1=John of Damascus|title=An Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, Book IV Chapter 17|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/33044.htm|access-date=17 October 2016|translator1=E. W. Watson|translator2=L. Pullan}}</ref> listed "the Revelation of [[John the Evangelist]]" as a canonical book.


=== Synods ===
=== Synods ===
The [[Council of Laodicea]] (363) omits it as a canonical book.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Synod of Laodicea|first1=|title=Synod of Laodicea Canon 60|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3806.htm|access-date=12 October 2016|translator-first1=Henry|translator-last1=Percival}}</ref>
The [[Council of Laodicea]] (363) omitted it as a canonical book.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Synod of Laodicea|title=Synod of Laodicea Canon 60|publisher=newadvent|url=http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3806.htm|access-date=12 October 2016|translator-first1=Henry|translator-last1=Percival}}</ref>


The {{lang|la|[[Decretum Gelasianum]]}}, which is a work written by an anonymous scholar between 519 and 553, contains a list of books of scripture presented as having been reckoned as canonical by the [[Council of Rome]] (382). This list mentions it as a part of the New Testament canon.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tertullian.org/decretum_eng.htm|title=Tertullian : Decretum Gelasianum (English translation)|first=Roger|last=Pearse|website=www.tertullian.org}}</ref>
The Latin text {{lang|la|[[Decretum Gelasianum]]}}, written by an anonymous scholar between 519 and 553, contains a list of books of scripture presented as having been reckoned as canonical by the [[Council of Rome]] (382). This list mentions it as a part of the New Testament canon.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.tertullian.org/decretum_eng.htm|title=Decretum Gelasianum de Libris Recipiendis et non Recipiendis (English translation)|editor-first=Ernst |editor-last=von Dobschütz|via=Tertullian|translator1=Roger Pearse}}</ref>


The [[Synod of Hippo]] (393),<ref>{{cite book|chapter-url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.xv.iv.iv.xxv.html |chapter=Canon XXIV. (Greek xxvii.) |publisher=Christian Classics Ethereal Library |title=The Canons of the 217 Blessed Fathers who assembled at Carthage}}</ref> followed by the [[Council of Carthage (397)|First Council of Carthage]] (397), the [[Council of Carthage (419)|Second Council of Carthage]] (419), the [[Council of Florence]] (1442),<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/FLORENCE.HTM|title=Eccumenical Council of Florence and Council of Basel|publisher=EWTN|access-date=26 June 2018|archive-date=20 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160220115924/https://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/FLORENCE.HTM|url-status=dead}}</ref> and the [[Council of Trent]] (1546),<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/TRENT4.htm|title=Paul III Council of Trent-4|publisher=EWTN|access-date=26 June 2018|archive-date=9 March 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000309111842/http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/TRENT4.HTM|url-status=dead}}</ref> classified it as a canonical book.<ref>{{cite book|chapter=Church Fathers: Council of Carthage (A.D. 419)|publisher=Christian Literature Publishing Co. |location=Buffalo, New York|year=1900|url= http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3816.htm|access-date=8 December 2024|translator-first1=Henry|translator-last1=Percival|title=Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series|volume=14|editor-first1=Philip|editor-last1=Schaff|editor-first2=Henry|editor-last2=Wace|editor-first3=Kevin|editor-last3=Knight}}</ref>
The [[Synod of Hippo]] (393),<ref>{{cite book|chapter-url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf214.xv.iv.iv.xxv.html |chapter=Canon XXIV. (Greek xxvii.) |publisher=Christian Classics Ethereal Library |title=The Canons of the 217 Blessed Fathers who assembled at Carthage}}</ref> followed by the [[Council of Carthage (397)|First Council of Carthage]] (397), the [[Council of Carthage (419)|Second Council of Carthage]] (419), the [[Council of Florence]] (1442),<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/FLORENCE.HTM|title=Eccumenical Council of Florence and Council of Basel|publisher=EWTN|access-date=26 June 2018|archive-date=20 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160220115924/https://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/FLORENCE.HTM|url-status=dead}}</ref> and the [[Council of Trent]] (1546),<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/TRENT4.htm|title=Paul III Council of Trent-4|publisher=EWTN|access-date=26 June 2018|archive-date=9 March 2000|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000309111842/http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/TRENT4.HTM|url-status=dead}}</ref> classified it as a canonical book.<ref>{{cite book|chapter=Church Fathers: Council of Carthage (A.D. 419)|publisher=Christian Literature Publishing Co. |location=Buffalo, New York|year=1900|url= http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3816.htm|access-date=8 December 2024|translator-first1=Henry|translator-last1=Percival|title=Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series|volume=14|editor-first1=Philip|editor-last1=Schaff|editor-first2=Henry|editor-last2=Wace|editor-first3=Kevin|editor-last3=Knight}}</ref>
Line 89: Line 90:
=== Outline ===
=== Outline ===
{{Main|Events of Revelation}}
{{Main|Events of Revelation}}
{{See also|Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse}}
Outline of the book of Revelation:[[File:BambergApocalypseFolio003rAngelWith7Candlesticks.JPG|right|thumb|Illustration from the [[Bamberg Apocalypse]] of the Son of Man among the seven lampstands.]]
Outline of the book of Revelation:
#The Revelation of Jesus Christ
#[[File:BambergApocalypseFolio003rAngelWith7Candlesticks.JPG|right|thumb|Illustration from the [[Bamberg Apocalypse]] of the Son of Man among the seven lampstands.]]The Revelation of Jesus Christ
##The Revelation of Jesus Christ is communicated to John through prophetic visions. (1:1–9)
##The Revelation of Jesus Christ is communicated to John through prophetic visions. (1:1–9)
##John is instructed by the "one like a son of man" to write all that he hears and sees, from the prophetic visions, to [[Seven Churches of Asia]]. (1:10–13)
##John is instructed by the "one like a son of man" to write all that he hears and sees, from the prophetic visions, to the [[Seven Churches of Asia]]. (1:10–13)
##The appearance of the "one like a son of man" is given, and he reveals what the seven stars and seven lampstands represent. (1:14–20)
##The appearance of the "one like a son of man" is given, and he reveals what the seven stars and seven lampstands represent. (1:14–20)
# Messages for seven churches of Asia
# [[File:Seven churches of asia.svg|thumb|right|upright=0.7|The map of ''West [[Anatolia]]'' (formerly the [[Asia (Roman province)|province of Asia]]) showing the island of [[Patmos]] and the location of the [[Seven churches of Asia|seven churches]] mentioned in the Book of Revelation]][[Epistles|Messages]] for seven churches of Asia. These take the literary form of Persian ''ruler letters'': purported royal decrees inscribed at major pagan temples to establish their ancient ''bona fides'' by demonstrating royal management: this still-contemporary form typically had sentences of proclamation, knowledge, praise, admonition, and judgment.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cornthwaite |first1=Christopher |title=Seven Letters from Jesus and Manufacturing Social Capital in Revelation |journal=Early Christianity |date=17 June 2022 |volume=9 |issue=2 |pages=135–157 |doi=10.1628/EC-2018-0009 |url=https://www.academia.edu/81698724}}</ref>
##[[Ephesus]]: From this church, he "who overcomes is granted to eat from the tree of life, which is in the midst of the Paradise of God." (2:1–7)
##[[Ephesus]]: From this church, he "who overcomes is granted to eat from the tree of life, which is in the midst of the Paradise of God." (2:1–7)
### Praised for not bearing those who are evil, testing those who say they are apostles and are not, and finding them to be liars; hating the deeds of the [[Nicolaitan]]s; having persevered and possessing patience.
##* Praised for not bearing those who are evil, testing those who say they are apostles and are not, and finding them to be liars; hating the deeds of the [[Nicolaitan]]s; having persevered and possessing patience.
### Admonished to "do the first works" and to repent for having left their "first love."
##* Admonished to "do the first works" and to repent for having left their "first love."
##[[Smyrna]] (modern [[İzmir]]): From this church, those who are faithful until death, will be given "the crown of life." He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the [[second death]]. (2:8–11)
##[[Smyrna]] (modern [[İzmir]]): From this church, those who are faithful until death, will be given "the crown of life." He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the [[second death]]. (2:8–11)
### Praised for being "rich" while impoverished and in tribulation.
##* Praised for being "rich" while impoverished and in tribulation.
### Admonished not to fear the "[[synagogue of Satan]]", nor fear a ten-day tribulation of being thrown into prison.
##* Admonished not to fear the "[[synagogue of Satan]]", nor fear a ten-day tribulation of being thrown into prison.
##[[File:Bamberg Apocalypse - To the Church in Pergamum and Thyatira.jpg|thumb|To the Church in Pergamum and Thyatira.]][[Pergamum]]: From this church, he who overcomes will be given the hidden [[manna]] to eat and a white stone with a secret name on it." (2:12–17)
##[[Pergamum]]: From this church, he who overcomes will be given the hidden [[manna]] to eat and a white stone with a secret name on it." (2:12–17)
### Praised for holding "fast to My name", not denying "My faith" even in the days of [[Antipas of Pergamum|Antipas]], "My faithful martyr."
##* Praised for holding "fast to My name", not denying "My faith" even in the days of [[Antipas of Pergamum|Antipas]], "My faithful martyr."
### Admonished to repent for having held the doctrine of [[Balaam]], who taught [[Balak]] to put a stumbling block before the [[children of Israel]]; eating things sacrificed to idols, committing sexual immorality, and holding the "doctrine of the Nicolaitans."
##* Admonished to repent for having held the doctrine of [[Balaam]], who taught [[Balak]] to put a stumbling block before the [[children of Israel]]; eating things sacrificed to idols, committing sexual immorality, and holding the "doctrine of the Nicolaitans."
## [[Thyatira]]: From this church, he who overcomes until the end, will be given power over the nations in order to dash them to pieces with a rod of iron; he will also be given the "morning star." (2:18–29)
## [[File:Bamberg Apocalypse - To the Church in Pergamum and Thyatira.jpg|thumb|To the Church in Pergamum and Thyatira.]][[Thyatira]]: From this church, he who overcomes until the end, will be given power over the nations in order to dash them to pieces with a rod of iron; he will also be given the "morning star." (2:18–29)
### Praised for their works, love, service, faith, and patience.
##* Praised for their works, love, service, faith, and patience.
### Admonished to repent for allowing a "prophetess" to promote sexual immorality and to eat things sacrificed to idols.
##* Admonished to repent for allowing a "prophetess" to promote sexual immorality and to eat things sacrificed to idols.
##[[Sardis]]: From this church, he who overcomes will be clothed in white garments, and his name will not be blotted out from the [[Book of Life]]; his name will also be confessed before the Father and his angels. (3:1–6)
##[[Sardis]]: From this church, he who overcomes will be clothed in white garments, and his name will not be blotted out from the [[Book of Life]]; his name will also be confessed before the Father and his angels. (3:1–6)
###Admonished to be watchful and to strengthen since their works have not been perfect before God.
##*Admonished to be watchful and to strengthen since their works have not been perfect before God.
##[[Alaşehir|Philadelphia]] (modern [[Alaşehir]]): From this church, he who overcomes will be made a pillar in the temple of God having the name of God, the name of the city of God, "[[New Jerusalem]]", and the [[Son of God (Christianity)|Son of God]]'s new name. (3:7–13)
##[[Alaşehir|Philadelphia]] (modern [[Alaşehir]]): From this church, he who overcomes will be made a pillar in the temple of God having the name of God, the name of the city of God, "[[New Jerusalem]]", and the [[Son of God (Christianity)|Son of God]]'s new name. (3:7–13)
### Praised for having some strength, keeping "My word", and having not denied "My name."
##* Praised for having some strength, keeping "My word", and having not denied "My name."
### Reminded to hold fast what they have, that no one may take their crown.
##* Reminded to hold fast what they have, that no one may take their crown.
##[[Laodicean Church|Laodicea]]: From this church, he who overcomes will be granted the opportunity to sit with the Son of God on his throne. (3:14–22)
##[[Laodicean Church|Laodicea]]: From this church, he who overcomes will be granted the opportunity to sit with the Son of God on his throne. (3:14–22)
### Admonished to be zealous and repent from being "lukewarm"; they are instructed to buy the "gold refined in the fire", that they may be rich; to buy "white garments", that they may be clothed, so that the shame of their nakedness would not be revealed; to anoint their eyes with eye salve, that they may see.
##* Admonished to be zealous and repent from being "lukewarm"; they are instructed to buy the "gold refined in the fire", that they may be rich; to buy "white garments", that they may be clothed, so that the shame of their nakedness would not be revealed; to anoint their eyes with eye salve, that they may see.
#[[File:BambergApocalypseFolio013vLambAndBookWith7Seals - crop.jpg|thumb|The Lamb with the Book with Seven Seals.]]Before the Throne of God
#[[File:BambergApocalypseFolio013vLambAndBookWith7Seals - crop.jpg|thumb|The Lamb with the Book with Seven Seals.]]Before the Throne of God
## The [[Throne of God]] appears, surrounded by twenty four thrones with twenty-four elders seated in them. (4:1–5)
## The [[Throne of God]] appears, surrounded by twenty-four thrones with twenty-four elders seated in them. (4:1–5)
## The four [[Living creatures (Bible)|living creatures]] are introduced. (4:6–11)
## The four [[Living creatures (Bible)|living creatures]] are introduced. (4:6–11)
## A scroll, with seven seals, is presented and it is declared that the [[Lion of Judah|Lion of the tribe of Judah]], from the "Root of [[King David|David]]", is the only one worthy to open this scroll. (5:1–5)
## A scroll, with seven seals, is presented and it is declared that the [[Lion of Judah|Lion of the tribe of Judah]], from the "Root of [[King David|David]]", is the only one worthy to open this scroll. (5:1–5)
Line 208: Line 208:


== Interpretations ==
== Interpretations ==
Revelation has a wide variety of interpretations, ranging from the simple historical interpretation, to a prophetic view on what will happen in the future by way of [[Will of God|God's will]] and the [[Woman of the Apocalypse|Woman's]] (traditionally believed to be the [[Queen of Heaven|Virgin Mary]]) victory over Satan ("[[Allegory|symbolic]] interpretation"), to different end time scenarios ("futurist interpretation"),{{sfn|Karris|1992|page=1296}}{{sfn|Bowers|2000|page=175}} to the views of critics who deny any spiritual value to Revelation at all,<ref>[[Carl Gustav Jung]] in his autobiography ''Memories Dream Reflections'' said "I will not discuss the transparent prophecies of the Book of Revelation because no one believes in them and the whole subject is felt to be an embarrassing one."</ref> ascribing it to a human-inherited [[Jungian archetypes|archetype]].
Revelation has a wide variety of interpretations, ranging from the simple historical interpretation, to a prophetic view on what will happen in the future by way of [[Will of God|God's will]] and the [[Woman of the Apocalypse|Woman's]] (traditionally believed to be the [[Queen of Heaven|Virgin Mary]]) victory over Satan ("[[Allegory|symbolic]] interpretation"), to different end time scenarios ("futurist interpretation"),{{sfn|Karris|1992|page=1296}}{{sfn|Bowers|2000|page=175}} to the views of critics who deny any spiritual value to Revelation at all,{{efn|[[Carl Gustav Jung]] in his autobiography ''Memories Dream Reflections'' said, "I will not discuss the transparent prophecies of the Book of Revelation because no one believes in them and the whole subject is felt to be an embarrassing one."}} ascribing it to a human-inherited [[Jungian archetypes|archetype]].


* [[Christian liturgy|Liturgical]] interpretations concentrate on the vision of the divine liturgy which Christians participate in by their earthy liturgies.{{sfn|Reardon|2018}}
* [[Christian liturgy|Liturgical]] interpretations concentrate on the vision of the divine liturgy which Christians participate in by their earthy liturgies.{{sfn|Reardon|2018}}
* [[Historicism (Christianity)|Historicist]] interpretations see Revelation as containing a broad view of history while
* [[Historicism (Christianity)|Historicist]] interpretations see Revelation as containing a broad view of history.
* [[Preterist]] interpretations treat Revelation as mostly referring to the events of the [[Christianity in the 1st century|Apostolic Age]] (1st century), or, at the latest, the fall of the [[Western Roman Empire]] in the 5th century.  
* [[Preterist]] interpretations treat Revelation as mostly referring to the events of the [[Christianity in the 1st century|Apostolic Age]] (1st century), or, at the latest, the fall of the [[Western Roman Empire]] in the 5th century.  
* [[Futurism (Christianity)|Futurists]], meanwhile, believe that Revelation describes future events with the seven churches growing into the body of believers throughout the age, and a reemergence or continuous rule of a Greco-Roman system with modern capabilities described by John in ways familiar to him; and
* [[Futurism (Christianity)|Futurist]] interpretations see Revelation as describing future events with the seven churches growing into the body of believers throughout the age, and a reemergence or continuous rule of a Greco-Roman system with modern capabilities described by John in ways familiar to him.
* [[Idealism (Christian eschatology)|idealist or symbolic]] interpretations consider that Revelation does not refer to actual people or events but is an [[allegory]] of the [[Spirituality|spiritual]] path and the ongoing struggle between good and evil.
* [[Idealism (Christian eschatology)|Idealist or symbolic]] interpretations consider that Revelation does not refer to actual people or events but is an [[allegory]] of the [[Spirituality|spiritual]] path and the ongoing struggle between good and evil.
 
Early church fathers did not treat Revelation in any detail. The Western and Eastern theologians developed independent theological approaches: in the West, the [[Jerome]] reworked the c. 300 first Latin commentary of [[Victorinus of Pettau]], downplaying millennialist/chilliast interpretations, while in the  East [[Andreas of Caesarea]] reworked the c.600 first Greek commentary of [[Oikoumenios]], with the calm judgement that the end-times had not then arrived.<ref>{{cite book |last=Andrew of Caesarea |title=Commentary on the Apocalypse|date=2011 |translator-first1=Eugenia|translator-last1=Constantinou |publisher=CUAPress |isbn=9780813228112 |url=https://www.cuapress.org/9780813228112/commentary-on-the-apocalypse/}}</ref>{{rp|7}}


=== Liturgical ===
=== Liturgical ===
The visions of the book are "presented with a framework of liturgical activities, and toward the end of the book it is hardly possible to dissociate the acts of worship from the vision of the future," according to Protestant theologian Otto A. Piper.<ref name=piper/> John was taken up in "on the Lord's day", perhaps during the primitive liturgy, presumably based on Jewish synagogue models: Piper suggests that the visions disclose "the divine purpose and heavenly realities behind them."
==== Heavenly liturgy ====
==== Heavenly liturgy ====
This interpretation draws out that John is seeing the liturgy of heaven: Lutheran historian Paul Westermeyer comments "It is a “revelation” about God's goodness, mercy, and power over evil in a cosmic view, not a secret code for our calendars. Revelation sings a new song of proclamation, praise, and rejoicing by voices of multitudes gathered around a great supper of the Lamb, punctuated by other sounds."{{sfn|Westermeyer|2020|pages=430-446}}
This interpretation draws out that John is seeing the liturgy of heaven: Lutheran historian Paul Westermeyer comments "It is a “revelation” about God's goodness, mercy, and power over evil in a cosmic view, not a secret code for our calendars. Revelation sings a new song of proclamation, praise, and rejoicing by voices of multitudes gathered around a great supper of the Lamb, punctuated by other sounds."{{sfn|Westermeyer|2020|pages=430-446}}
Line 222: Line 226:
Revelation mentions various objects of John's vision of the angelic  liturgy: an altar, robes, candles, incense, manna, chalices, the sign of the cross, references to the Lamb and to Mary, etc.<ref name=hahn/>
Revelation mentions various objects of John's vision of the angelic  liturgy: an altar, robes, candles, incense, manna, chalices, the sign of the cross, references to the Lamb and to Mary, etc.<ref name=hahn/>


Revelation sets an exemplar of the angelic liturgy which earthly liturgies should emulate, join and anticipate, in a view associated with [[Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite]]' [[De Coelesti Hierarchia|Celestial Hierarchy]]. For Catholic theologian [[Joseph Ratzinger]] (later Pope Benedict XVI):
Revelation sets an exemplar of the angelic liturgy which earthly liturgies should emulate, join and anticipate, in a view associated with [[Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite]]' [[De Coelesti Hierarchia|Celestial Hierarchy]]. Otto A. Piper has suggested that Revelation discloses many Primitive Church theological and liturgical emphases or impulses, such as the church's participation in angelic worship, the worthiness of the interpreter of scripture, the liturgy as a spiritual battle, and the connection between Confession of Sins and the Eucharist, some being still current: "the description of the heavenly liturgy in Revelation was patterned after the actual liturgy of the Primitive Church." <ref name=piper>{{cite journal |last1=Piper |first1=Otto A. |title=The Apocalypse of John and the Liturgy of the Ancient Church |journal=Church History |date=1951 |volume=20 |issue=1 |pages=10–22 |doi=10.2307/3162045 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3162045 |issn=0009-6407}}</ref>
 
For Catholic theologian [[Joseph Ratzinger]] (later Pope Benedict XVI):


{{blockquote|With its vision of the cosmic liturgy, in the midst of which stands the Lamb who was sacrificed, the Apocalypse has presented the essential contents of the eucharistic sacrament in an impressive form that sets a standard for every local liturgy. From the point of view of the Apocalypse, the essential matter of all eucharistic liturgy is its participation in the heavenly liturgy; it is from thence that it necessarily derives its unity, its catholicity, and its universality.|source=Joseph Ratzinger, ''Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith''{{sfn|Ratzinger|2005}}}}
{{blockquote|With its vision of the cosmic liturgy, in the midst of which stands the Lamb who was sacrificed, the Apocalypse has presented the essential contents of the eucharistic sacrament in an impressive form that sets a standard for every local liturgy. From the point of view of the Apocalypse, the essential matter of all eucharistic liturgy is its participation in the heavenly liturgy; it is from thence that it necessarily derives its unity, its catholicity, and its universality.|source=Joseph Ratzinger, ''Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith''{{sfn|Ratzinger|2005}}}}


==== Paschal/eucharistic liturgy ====
==== Paschal/eucharistic liturgy ====
This interpretation, which has found expression among both Catholic and Protestant theologians, considers the [[Christian liturgy|liturgical]] worship, particularly the [[Easter]] rites, of early Christianity as background and context for understanding the Book of Revelation's structure and significance. For Marilyn Parry, "there is a large loose structure which focuses on the eucharistic liturgies of the early church."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Parry |first1=Marilyn |title=The Significance of the Book of Revelation to the Development of the Liturgy (PhD thesis) |date=2000 |publisher=University of Manchester}}</ref>
This interpretation, which has found expression among both Catholic and Protestant theologians, considers the [[Christian liturgy|liturgical]] worship, particularly the [[Easter]] rites, of early Christianity as background and context for understanding the Book of Revelation's structure and significance. For Marilyn Parry, "there is a large loose structure which focuses on the eucharistic liturgies of the early church."{{sfn|Parry|2000}}


This perspective is explained in ''The Paschal Liturgy and the Apocalypse'' (new edition, 2004) by [[Massey H. Shepherd]], an Episcopal scholar, and in [[Scott Hahn]]'s ''The Lamb's Supper: The Mass as Heaven on Earth'' (1999),<ref name=hahn/> in which he states that Revelation in form is structured after creation, fall, judgment and redemption. Those who hold this view say that the Temple's destruction (AD 70) had a profound effect on the Jewish people, not only in Jerusalem but among the Greek-speaking Jews of the Mediterranean.<ref name=hahn>{{cite book |first=Scott |last=Hahn |title=The Lamb's Supper: The Mass as Heaven on Earth |isbn=0-385-49659-1 |location=New York |publisher=Doubleday |year=1999}}</ref>
This perspective is explained in ''The Paschal Liturgy and the Apocalypse'' (new edition, 2004) by [[Massey H. Shepherd]], an Episcopal scholar, and in [[Scott Hahn]]'s ''The Lamb's Supper: The Mass as Heaven on Earth'' (1999),<ref name=hahn/> in which he states that Revelation in form is structured after creation, fall, judgment and redemption. Those who hold this view say that the Temple's destruction (AD 70) had a profound effect on the Jewish people, not only in Jerusalem but among the Greek-speaking Jews of the Mediterranean.<ref name=hahn>{{cite book |first=Scott |last=Hahn |title=The Lamb's Supper: The Mass as Heaven on Earth |isbn=0-385-49659-1 |location=New York |publisher=Doubleday |year=1999}}</ref>
Line 233: Line 239:
They believe the Book of Revelation provides insight into the early Eucharist, saying that it is the new Temple worship in the New Heaven and Earth. The idea of the Eucharist as a foretaste of the heavenly banquet is also explored by British Methodist Geoffrey Wainwright in his book ''Eucharist and Eschatology'' (Oxford University Press, 1980).
They believe the Book of Revelation provides insight into the early Eucharist, saying that it is the new Temple worship in the New Heaven and Earth. The idea of the Eucharist as a foretaste of the heavenly banquet is also explored by British Methodist Geoffrey Wainwright in his book ''Eucharist and Eschatology'' (Oxford University Press, 1980).


According to [[Pope Benedict XVI]] some of the images of Revelation should be understood in the context of the dramatic suffering and persecution of the churches of Asia in the 1st century.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pope Benedict XVI |title=John, the Seer of Patmos |url=http://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2006/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20060823.html |location=Vatican City |publisher=Libreria Editrice Vaticana |access-date=31 May 2020 |author1-link=Pope Benedict XVI }}</ref> Accordingly, they argue, the Book of Revelation should not be read as an enigmatic warning, but as an encouraging vision of Christ's definitive victory over evil.<ref>{{cite web |first=John |last=Thavis |url=http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=20995 |title=Pope Benedict: Read Book of Revelation as Christ's victory over evil |website=Catholic Online |agency=Catholic News Service |date=23 August 2006 |access-date=25 April 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131005010122/http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=20995 |archive-date=5 October 2013 }}</ref>
This view builds from scholarly insights that identify various hymns or liturgical sequences in Revelation that are likely derived from, as well as informing, early church liturgy: [[Sanctus|Holy Holy Holy]]/{{lang|la|Sanctus}}/{{lang|el|trisagion}} (Rev 4:8,11), "Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!” followed by “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen" (Rev 20:20), "Worthy is the Lamb" (Rev 5:9-13), and many others.{{sfn|Westermeyer|2020|pages=430-446}}{{rp|432}} Some of the hymns may have had an anti-imperial theology.{{sfn|Jeffcoat Schedtler|2020|pages=114-130}}


This view builds from scholarly insights that identify various hymns or liturgical sequences in Revelation that are likely derived from, as well as informing, early church liturgy: [[Sanctus|Holy Holy Holy]]/{{lang|la|Sanctus}}/{{lang|el|trisagion}} (Rev 4:8,11), "Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!” followed by “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen" (Rev 20:20), "Worthy is the Lamb" (Rev 5:9-13), and many others.{{sfn|Westermeyer|2020|pages=430-446}}{{rp|432}} Some of the hymns may have had an anti-imperial theology.{{sfn|Jeffcoat Schedtler|2020|pages=114-130}}
==== Oriental Orthodox ====
==== Oriental Orthodox ====
[[File:Mural from Apa Apollo in Bawit - Detail.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|"Christ in Glory (Pankrator)", c. 6th–8th century CE, wall painting from the Monastery of Bawit. The Coptic iconography represents many elements from the Book of Revelation.]]
[[File:Mural from Apa Apollo in Bawit - Detail.jpg|thumb|upright=1.15|"Christ in Glory (Pankrator)", c. 6th–8th century AD, wall painting from the Monastery of Bawit. The Coptic iconography represents many elements from the Book of Revelation.]]
In the [[Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria|Coptic Orthodox Church]], [[Armenian Apostolic Church]] and [[Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church]] the whole Book of Revelation is read during Apocalypse Night after [[Good Friday]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://suscopts.org/resources/literature/222/night-of-the-apocalypse/ |title=Night of the Apocalypse |author1=H. G. Bishop Youssef|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404174734/http://suscopts.org/resources/literature/222/night-of-the-apocalypse/ |archive-date=2023-04-04 |publisher=[[Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States]] |access-date=23 May 2018}}</ref> Biblically Ugo Vanni and other biblical scholars have argued that the Book of Revelation was written with the intention to be read entirely in one liturgical setting with dialogue-elements between the reader (singular) and the hearers (plural) based on Rev 1:3 and Rev 1:10.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Vanni |first=Ugo |date=1991 |title=Liturgical Dialogue as a Literary Form in the Book of Revelation |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/abs/liturgical-dialogue-as-a-literary-form-in-the-book-of-revelation/50544029342CC67BF81545C1F7CE1780 |journal=New Testament Studies |language=en |volume=37 |issue=3 |pages=348–372 |doi=10.1017/S0028688500015927 |s2cid=170638316 |issn=1469-8145|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Beniamin Zakhary has recently shown that the structure of the reading the Book of Revelation within the Coptic rite of Apocalypse Night (this is the only biblical reading in the Coptic church with a dialogue in it, where the reader stops many times and the people respond; additionally the entire book is read in a liturgical setting that culminates with the Eucharist) shows great support for this biblical hypothesis, albeit with some notable difference.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |first=Beniamin |last=Zakhary |year=2022 |title=Support For The Biblical Liturgy of Revelation in the Coptic Tradition |journal=Doxology |volume=33 |number=4 |pages=6–23 |url=https://zenodo.org/records/8060812 |doi=10.5281/zenodo.8060812}}</ref>
In the [[Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria|Coptic Orthodox Church]], [[Armenian Apostolic Church]] and [[Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church]] the whole Book of Revelation is read during Apocalypse Night after [[Good Friday]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://suscopts.org/resources/literature/222/night-of-the-apocalypse/ |title=Night of the Apocalypse |author1=H. G. Bishop Youssef|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230404174734/http://suscopts.org/resources/literature/222/night-of-the-apocalypse/ |archive-date=2023-04-04 |publisher=[[Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States]] |access-date=23 May 2018}}</ref> Biblically Ugo Vanni and other biblical scholars have argued that the Book of Revelation was written with the intention to be read entirely in one liturgical setting with dialogue-elements between the reader (singular) and the hearers (plural) based on Rev 1:3 and Rev 1:10.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Vanni |first=Ugo |date=1991 |title=Liturgical Dialogue as a Literary Form in the Book of Revelation |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/abs/liturgical-dialogue-as-a-literary-form-in-the-book-of-revelation/50544029342CC67BF81545C1F7CE1780 |journal=New Testament Studies |language=en |volume=37 |issue=3 |pages=348–372 |doi=10.1017/S0028688500015927 |s2cid=170638316 |issn=1469-8145|url-access=subscription }}</ref> Beniamin Zakhary has recently shown that the structure of the reading the Book of Revelation within the Coptic rite of Apocalypse Night (this is the only biblical reading in the Coptic church with a dialogue in it, where the reader stops many times and the people respond; additionally the entire book is read in a liturgical setting that culminates with the Eucharist) shows great support for this biblical hypothesis, albeit with some notable difference.{{sfn|Zakhary|2022|pages=6-23}}


Additionally, the Book of Revelation permeates many liturgical prayers and iconography within the Coptic Church.<ref name=":0" />{{sfn|Fakhry|2019}}
Additionally, the Book of Revelation permeates many liturgical prayers and iconography within the Coptic Church.{{sfn|Zakhary|2022|pages=6-23}}{{sfn|Fakhry|2019}}


=== Eschatological ===
=== Eschatological ===
Line 254: Line 259:
* [[Postmillennialism]], which includes both literal and allegorical interpretations of the "millennium" but views the [[Second Coming]] as following the conversion to Christianity of a gradually improving world.{{sfn|Johnson|2008}}
* [[Postmillennialism]], which includes both literal and allegorical interpretations of the "millennium" but views the [[Second Coming]] as following the conversion to Christianity of a gradually improving world.{{sfn|Johnson|2008}}


 
==== Catholic {{anchor|Roman Catholic}}====
==== Roman Catholic ====


According to the [[United States Conference of Catholic Bishops]] the Book of Revelation contains an account of visions in symbolic and allegorical language borrowed extensively from the Old Testament. Symbolic descriptions are not to be taken as literal descriptions, nor is the symbolism meant to be pictured realistically.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://bible.usccb.org/bible/revelation/0|title=Introduction|publisher=United States Conference of Catholic Bishops|access-date=8 December 2024}}</ref>
According to the [[United States Conference of Catholic Bishops]] the Book of Revelation contains an account of visions in symbolic and allegorical language borrowed extensively from the Old Testament. Symbolic descriptions are not to be taken as literal descriptions, nor is the symbolism meant to be pictured realistically.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://bible.usccb.org/bible/revelation/0|title=Introduction|publisher=United States Conference of Catholic Bishops|access-date=8 December 2024}}</ref>


[[Pope Benedict XVI]] taught that Revelation "should be understood against the backdrop of" the early church's persecutions and inner problems, that "the Lamb who is slain yet standing" symbolizes Jesus' [[paschal mystery]] and Jesus being the [[meaning of life]], that the vision of the woman and child symbolizes both Mary and the Church, that the New Jerusalem symbolizes the Church in its glory on [[Judgment Day]], and that the prayers in Revelation reflect 1st century Jewish-Christian liturgy and Jewish-Christian understanding of the heavenly liturgy.<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2006/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20060823.html Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 23 August 2006]</ref><ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20120905.html Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 5 September 2012]</ref><ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20120912.html Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 12 September 2012]</ref><ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2005/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20050511.html Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 11 May 2005]</ref>
According to [[Pope Benedict XVI]] some of the images of Revelation should be understood in the context of the dramatic suffering and persecution of the churches of Asia in the 1st century.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pope Benedict XVI |title=John, the Seer of Patmos |url=http://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2006/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20060823.html |location=Vatican City |publisher=Libreria Editrice Vaticana |access-date=31 May 2020 |author1-link=Pope Benedict XVI }}</ref> Accordingly, the Book of Revelation should not be read as an enigmatic warning, but as an encouraging vision of Christ's definitive victory over evil.<ref>{{cite web |first=John |last=Thavis |url=http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=20995 |title=Pope Benedict: Read Book of Revelation as Christ's victory over evil |website=Catholic Online |agency=Catholic News Service |date=23 August 2006 |access-date=25 April 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131005010122/http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=20995 |archive-date=5 October 2013 }}</ref> [[Pope Benedict XVI]] taught that Revelation "should be understood against the backdrop of" the early church's persecutions and inner problems, that "the Lamb who is slain yet standing" symbolizes Jesus' [[paschal mystery]] and Jesus being the [[meaning of life]], that the vision of the woman and child symbolizes both Mary and the Church, that the New Jerusalem symbolizes the Church in its glory on [[Judgment Day]], and that the prayers in Revelation reflect 1st century Jewish-Christian liturgy and Jewish-Christian understanding of the heavenly liturgy.<ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2006/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20060823.html Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 23 August 2006]</ref><ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20120905.html Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 5 September 2012]</ref><ref>[https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2012/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20120912.html Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 12 September 2012]</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/audiences/2005/documents/hf_ben-xvi_aud_20050511.html|author1=Benedict XVI|title=General Audience|date=11 May 2005|publisher=The Holy See}}</ref>


According to [[Catholic Answers]], the author of Revelation identifies the beast as the Roman Empire, the dragon as Satan, and Babylon as Rome. The meaning is that Rome "cannot win. It will be completely overthrown, and the Church is sure to triumph. This prophecy is as it were the hub of the Apocalypse. Around it John gradually unfolds the plan God has for the future of his Church."<ref>{{cite web|last=Fuentes|first=Antonio|url=https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/apocalypse|website=Catholic.Com|title=The Book of Revelation}}</ref>
According to [[Catholic Answers]], the author of Revelation identifies the beast as the Roman Empire, the dragon as Satan, and Babylon as Rome. The meaning is that Rome "cannot win. It will be completely overthrown, and the Church is sure to triumph. This prophecy is as it were the hub of the Apocalypse. Around it John gradually unfolds the plan God has for the future of his Church."<ref>{{cite web|last=Fuentes|first=Antonio|url=https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/apocalypse|website=Catholic.Com|title=The Book of Revelation|year=1995}}</ref>


==== Eastern Orthodox ====
==== Eastern Orthodox ====
Line 307: Line 311:
Christian Gnostics are unlikely to be attracted to the teaching of Revelation because the doctrine of salvation through the sacrificed Lamb, which is central to Revelation, is repugnant to Gnostics. Christian Gnostics "believed in the Forgiveness of Sins, but in no vicarious sacrifice for sin ... they accepted Christ in the full realisation of the word; his life, not his death, was the keynote of their doctrine and their practice."{{sfn|Swiney|1909|pages=3, 4}}
Christian Gnostics are unlikely to be attracted to the teaching of Revelation because the doctrine of salvation through the sacrificed Lamb, which is central to Revelation, is repugnant to Gnostics. Christian Gnostics "believed in the Forgiveness of Sins, but in no vicarious sacrifice for sin ... they accepted Christ in the full realisation of the word; his life, not his death, was the keynote of their doctrine and their practice."{{sfn|Swiney|1909|pages=3, 4}}


[[James Morgan Pryse]] was an esoteric gnostic who saw Revelation as a western version of the Hindu theory of the [[Chakra]]. He began his work, "The purpose of this book is to show that the Apocalypse is a manual of spiritual development and not, as conventionally interpreted, a cryptic history or prophecy."{{sfn|Pryse|1910}}{{efn|The theory behind the book is given in {{cite book |first=Arthur |last=Avalon |author-link=John Woodroffe |title=The Serpent Power |location=Madras (Chennai) |publisher=Ganesh & Co. |year=1913}}}}{{efn|One version of how these beliefs might have travelled from India to the Middle East, Greece and Rome is given in the opening chapters of {{cite book |last=Otto |first=Rudolf |author-link=Rudolf Otto |title=The Kingdom of God and the Son of Man |location=London |publisher=Lutterworth |year=1938}}}} Such diverse theories have failed to command widespread acceptance. However, Christopher Rowland argues: "there are always going to be loose threads which refuse to be woven into the fabric as a whole. The presence of the threads which stubbornly refuse to be incorporated into the neat tapestry of our world-view does not usually totally undermine that view."{{sfn|Rowland|1993|page=5}}
[[James Morgan Pryse]] was an esoteric gnostic who saw Revelation as a western version of the Hindu theory of the [[Chakra]]. He began his work, "The purpose of this book is to show that the Apocalypse is a manual of spiritual development and not, as conventionally interpreted, a cryptic history or prophecy."{{sfn|Pryse|1910}}{{efn|The theory behind the book is given in {{cite book |first=Arthur |last=Avalon |author-link=John Woodroffe |title=The Serpent Power |location=Madras (Chennai) |publisher=Ganesh & Co. |year=1913}}}}{{efn|One version of how these beliefs might have travelled from India to the Middle East, Greece and Rome is given in the opening chapters of {{cite book |last=Otto |first=Rudolf |author-link=Rudolf Otto |title=The Kingdom of God and the Son of Man |location=London |publisher=Lutterworth |year=1938}}}} Such diverse theories have failed to command widespread acceptance. However, [[Christopher Rowland (theologian)|Christopher Rowland]] argues: "there are always going to be loose threads which refuse to be woven into the fabric as a whole. The presence of the threads which stubbornly refuse to be incorporated into the neat tapestry of our world-view does not usually totally undermine that view."{{sfn|Rowland|1993|page=5}}


==== Radical discipleship ====
==== Radical discipleship ====
Line 317: Line 321:
[[File:Augsburger Wunderzeichenbuch — Folio 185 crop.jpg|thumb |upright=1.15|This artwork from {{lang|de|[[Augsburg Book of Miracles|Augsburger Wunderzeichenbuch]]}} illustrates Revelation 11:5–8: "And if anyone would harm them, fire pours from their mouth and consumes their foes. If anyone would harm them, this is how he is doomed to be killed&nbsp;... And when they have finished their testimony, the beast that rises from the bottomless pit will make war on them and conquer them and kill them, and their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city." ({{c.|1550}})]]
[[File:Augsburger Wunderzeichenbuch — Folio 185 crop.jpg|thumb |upright=1.15|This artwork from {{lang|de|[[Augsburg Book of Miracles|Augsburger Wunderzeichenbuch]]}} illustrates Revelation 11:5–8: "And if anyone would harm them, fire pours from their mouth and consumes their foes. If anyone would harm them, this is how he is doomed to be killed&nbsp;... And when they have finished their testimony, the beast that rises from the bottomless pit will make war on them and conquer them and kill them, and their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city." ({{c.|1550}})]]


Literary writers and theorists have contributed to a wide range of theories about the origins and purpose of the Book of Revelation. Some of these writers have no connection with established Christian faiths but, nevertheless, found in Revelation a source of inspiration. Revelation has been approached from Hindu philosophy and Jewish [[Midrash]]. Others have pointed to aspects of composition which have been ignored such as the similarities of prophetic inspiration to modern poetic inspiration, or the parallels with [[Theatre of ancient Greece|Greek drama]]. In recent years, theories have arisen which concentrate upon how readers and texts interact to create meaning and which are less interested in what the original author intended.{{sfn|Breu|2019}}
Literary writers and theorists have contributed to a wide range of theories about the origins and purpose of the Book of Revelation.  


[[Charles Cutler Torrey]] taught [[Semitic languages]] at [[Yale University]]. His lasting contribution has been to show how prophets, such as the scribe of Revelation, are much more meaningful when treated as poets first and foremost. He thought this was a point often lost sight of because most English bibles render everything in prose.{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p={{page needed|date=October 2024}}}} Christopher R. North says of Torrey's earlier Isaiah theory, "Few scholars of any standing have accepted his theory."{{sfn|North|1964|page=23}} This is the general view of Torrey's theories.{{citation needed|date=September 2024}} However, Christopher North goes on to cite Torrey on 20 major occasions and many more minor ones in the course of his book. So, Torrey must have had some influence and poetry is the key.{{opinion|date=May 2025}}{{citation needed|date=September 2024}} Poetry was also the reason John never directly quoted the older prophets. Had he done so, he would have had to use their (Hebrew) poetry whereas he wanted to write his own. Torrey insisted Revelation had originally been written in [[Aramaic]].{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=7}}
Victorian poet [[Christina Rossetti]]'s ''The Face of the Deep'' is a meditation upon the Apocalypse in the form of a verse-by-verse commentary.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Rossetti |first1=Christina Georgina |title=The face of the deep : a devotional commentary on the Apocalypse |url=https://archive.org/details/thefaceofthedeep00rossuoft/page/n1/mode/2up |publisher=London : S.P.C.K |date=1893}}</ref> In her view, what Revelation has to teach is patience.{{efn|Rossetti remarks that patience is a word which does not occur in the Bible until the New Testament, as if the usage first came from Christ's own lips.{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=115}}}} Patience is the closest to perfection the human condition allows.<ref>{{harvnb|Rossetti|1892|p=26}}: "Christians should resemble fire-flies, not glow-worms; their brightness drawing eyes upward, not downward."</ref> Her book, which is largely written in prose, frequently breaks into poetry or jubilation, much like Revelation itself. The relevance of John's visions{{efn|'Vision' lends the wrong emphasis as Rossetti sought to minimise the distinction between John's experience and that of others. She quoted 1 John 3:24, "He abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us" to show that when John says, "I was in the Spirit" it is not exceptional.}} belongs to Christians of all times as a continuous present meditation. Such matters are eternal and outside of normal human reckoning. "That winter which will be the death of Time has no promise of termination. Winter that returns not to spring ... – who can bear it?"{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=301}} She dealt deftly with the vengeful aspects of John's message. "A few are charged to do judgment; everyone without exception is charged to show mercy."{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=292}} Her conclusion is that Christians should see John as "representative of all his brethren" so they should "hope as he hoped, love as he loved".{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=495}}


According to Torrey, "The Fourth Gospel was brought to Ephesus by a Christian fugitive from Palestine soon after the middle of the first century. It was written in Aramaic." Later, the Ephesians claimed this fugitive had actually been the beloved disciple himself. Subsequently, this John was banished by Nero and died on Patmos after writing Revelation. Torrey argued that until AD 80, when Christians were expelled from the synagogues,{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=37}} the Christian message was always first heard in the synagogue and, for cultural reasons, the evangelist would have spoken in Aramaic, else "he would have had no hearing".{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=8}} Torrey showed how the three major songs in Revelation (the new song, the song of Moses and the Lamb and the chorus at 19:6–8) each fall naturally into four regular metrical lines plus a coda.{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=137}} Other dramatic moments in Revelation, such as 6:16 where the terrified people cry out to be hidden, behave in a similar way.{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=140}} The surviving Greek translation was a literal translation that aimed to comply with the warning at Revelation 22:18 that the text must not be "corrupted" in any way.
[[Charles Cutler Torrey]] taught [[Semitic languages]] at [[Yale University]]. He championed the view that prophets, such as the scribe of Revelation, are much more meaningful when treated as poets first and foremost. He thought this was a point often lost sight of because most English bibles render everything in prose.{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p={{page needed|date=October 2024}}}} Torrey insisted Revelation had originally been written in [[Aramaic]].{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=7}} However, Old Testament scholar Christopher R. North said of Torrey's earlier Isaiah theory, "Few scholars of any standing have accepted his theory."{{sfn|North|1964|page=23}} Torrey proposed that the three major songs in Revelation (the new song, the song of Moses and the Lamb and the chorus at 19:6–8) each fall naturally into four regular metrical lines plus a coda.{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=137}} Other dramatic moments in Revelation, such as 6:16 where the terrified people cry out to be hidden, behave in a similar way.{{sfn|Torrey|1958|p=140}}  


[[Christina Rossetti]] was a Victorian poet who believed the sensual excitement of the natural world found its meaningful purpose in death and in God.<ref>"Flowers preach to us if we will hear", begins her poem "Consider the lilies of the field". {{cite book |title=Goblin Market, Prince's Progress and Other Poems |location=London |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1913 |page=87}}</ref> Her ''The Face of the Deep'' is a meditation upon the Apocalypse. In her view, what Revelation has to teach is patience.{{efn|Rossetti remarks that patience is a word which does not occur in the Bible until the New Testament, as if the usage first came from Christ's own lips.{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=115}}}} Patience is the closest to perfection the human condition allows.<ref>{{harvnb|Rossetti|1892|p=26}}: "Christians should resemble fire-flies, not glow-worms; their brightness drawing eyes upward, not downward."</ref> Her book, which is largely written in prose, frequently breaks into poetry or jubilation, much like Revelation itself. The relevance of John's visions{{efn|'Vision' lends the wrong emphasis as Rossetti sought to minimise the distinction between John's experience and that of others. She quoted 1 John 3:24, "He abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us" to show that when John says, "I was in the Spirit" it is not exceptional.}} belongs to Christians of all times as a continuous present meditation. Such matters are eternal and outside of normal human reckoning. "That winter which will be the death of Time has no promise of termination. Winter that returns not to spring ... – who can bear it?"{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=301}} She dealt deftly with the vengeful aspects of John's message. "A few are charged to do judgment; everyone without exception is charged to show mercy."{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=292}} Her conclusion is that Christians should see John as "representative of all his brethren" so they should "hope as he hoped, love as he loved".{{sfn|Rossetti|1892|p=495}}
[[D. H. Lawrence]] took an opposing (to, e.g., Rossetti), pessimistic view of Revelation in the final book he wrote, ''Apocalypse''.{{sfn|Lawrence|1932}} He saw the language which Revelation used as being bleak and destructive; a 'death-product'. His specific aesthetic objections to Revelation were that its imagery was unnatural and that phrases like "the wrath of the Lamb" were "ridiculous". He saw Revelation as comprising two discordant halves. In the first, there was a scheme of cosmic renewal in "great Chaldean sky-spaces", which he quite liked. After that, Lawrence thought, the book became preoccupied with the birth of the baby messiah and "flamboyant hate and simple lust ... for the end of the world".<ref>{{cite book|first=D. H. |last=Lawrence |author-link=D. H. Lawrence |year=1995 |title=Apocalypse and the Writings on Revelation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=umOIicD8H9oC&pg=PA112 |publisher=Penguin Books |isbn=978-0-14-018781-6|page=112}}</ref>


Recently,{{clarify timeframe|date=September 2024}} aesthetic and literary modes of interpretation have developed, which focus on Revelation as a work of art and imagination, viewing the imagery as symbolic depictions of timeless truths and the victory of good over evil. [[Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza]] wrote ''Revelation: Vision of a Just World'' from the viewpoint of rhetoric.<ref>{{cite book |first=Elisabeth |last=Schüssler Fiorenza |author-link=Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza |title=Revelation: Vision of a Just World |location=Edinburgh |publisher=T&T Clark |year=1993}} The book seems to have started life as ''Invitation to the Book of Revelation'' (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1981).</ref> Accordingly, Revelation's meaning is partially determined by the way John goes about saying things, partially by the context in which readers receive the message and partially by its appeal to something beyond logic.{{sfn|Pippin|1993|page=105}}
Recently,{{clarify timeframe|date=September 2024}} aesthetic and literary modes of interpretation have developed, which focus on Revelation as a work of art and imagination, viewing the imagery as symbolic depictions of timeless truths and the victory of good over evil. [[Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza]] wrote ''Revelation: Vision of a Just World'' from the viewpoint of rhetoric.<ref>{{cite book |first=Elisabeth |last=Schüssler Fiorenza |author-link=Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza |title=Revelation: Vision of a Just World |location=Edinburgh |publisher=T&T Clark |year=1993}} The book seems to have started life as ''Invitation to the Book of Revelation'' (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1981).</ref> Accordingly, Revelation's meaning is partially determined by the way John goes about saying things, partially by the context in which readers receive the message and partially by its appeal to something beyond logic.{{sfn|Pippin|1993|page=105}}
Line 329: Line 333:
Professor Schüssler Fiorenza believes that Revelation has particular relevance today as a liberating message to disadvantaged groups. John's book is a vision of a just world, not a vengeful threat of world-destruction. Her view that Revelation's message is not gender-based has caused dissent. She says humanity is to look behind the symbols rather than make a fetish out of them. In contrast, Tina Pippin states that John writes "[[Horror fiction|horror literature]]" and "the [[misogyny]] which underlies the narrative is extreme."{{sfn|Pippin|1993|page=105}}
Professor Schüssler Fiorenza believes that Revelation has particular relevance today as a liberating message to disadvantaged groups. John's book is a vision of a just world, not a vengeful threat of world-destruction. Her view that Revelation's message is not gender-based has caused dissent. She says humanity is to look behind the symbols rather than make a fetish out of them. In contrast, Tina Pippin states that John writes "[[Horror fiction|horror literature]]" and "the [[misogyny]] which underlies the narrative is extreme."{{sfn|Pippin|1993|page=105}}


[[D. H. Lawrence]] took an opposing, pessimistic view of Revelation in the final book he wrote, ''Apocalypse''.{{sfn|Lawrence|1932}} He saw the language which Revelation used as being bleak and destructive; a 'death-product'. Instead, he wanted to champion a public-spirited individualism (which he identified with the historical Jesus supplemented by an ill-defined cosmic consciousness) against its two natural enemies. One of these he called "the sovereignty of the intellect"{{sfn|Lawrence|1932|p=xxiii}} which he saw in a technology-based totalitarian society. The other enemy he styled "vulgarity"{{sfn|Lawrence|1932|p=6}} and that was what he found in Revelation. "It is very nice if you are poor and not humble ... to bring your enemies down to utter destruction, while you yourself rise up to grandeur. And nowhere does this happen so splendiferously than in Revelation."{{sfn|Lawrence|1932|p=11}} Lawrence did not consider how these two types of Christianity (good and bad in his view) might be related other than as opposites. He noted the difference meant that the John who wrote a gospel could not be the same John who wrote Revelation.
In recent years, theories have arisen which concentrate upon how readers and texts interact to create meaning and which are less interested in what the original author intended.{{sfn|Breu|2019}}
 
His specific aesthetic objections to Revelation were that its imagery was unnatural and that phrases like "the wrath of the Lamb" were "ridiculous". He saw Revelation as comprising two discordant halves. In the first, there was a scheme of cosmic renewal in "great Chaldean sky-spaces", which he quite liked. After that, Lawrence thought, the book became preoccupied with the birth of the baby messiah and "flamboyant hate and simple lust ... for the end of the world". Lawrence coined the term "Patmossers" to describe those Christians who could only be happy in paradise if they knew their enemies were suffering in hell.<ref>{{cite book|first=D. H. |last=Lawrence |author-link=D. H. Lawrence |year=1995 |title=Apocalypse and the Writings on Revelation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=umOIicD8H9oC&pg=PA112 |publisher=Penguin Books |isbn=978-0-14-018781-6|page=112}}</ref>


=== Academic ===
=== Academic ===
{{Further|higher criticism|apocalyptic literature}}
{{Further|higher criticism|apocalyptic literature}}
Modern biblical scholarship attempts to understand Revelation in its 1st-century historical context within the genre of Jewish and Christian apocalyptic literature.<ref name="Martin 2009"/> This approach considers the text as an address to seven historical communities in Asia Minor. Under this interpretation, assertions that "the time is near" are to be taken literally by those communities. Consequently, the work is viewed as a warning not to conform to contemporary Greco-Roman society which John "unveils" as beastly, demonic, and subject to divine judgment.<ref name="Martin 2009">{{cite AV media |author-link=Dale Martin (scholar) |first=Dale |last=Martin |year=2009 |type=lecture |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ9Gt_R5a-k|title=24. Apocalyptic and Accommodation |publisher=[[Yale University]] |via=YouTube |access-date=22 July 2013}} [http://www.cosmolearning.com/video-lectures/apocalyptic-and-accommodation-6817/ Lecture 24 (transcript)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140906132019/http://www.cosmolearning.com/video-lectures/apocalyptic-and-accommodation-6817/ |date=6 September 2014 |last1=Martin|first1=Dale}}</ref>
Modern biblical scholarship attempts to understand Revelation in its 1st-century historical context within the genre of Jewish and Christian apocalyptic literature.<ref name="Brit">{{cite web |title=Revelation to John |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Revelation-to-John |website=Encyclopedia Brittanica |language=en}}</ref><ref name="Martin 2009"/> This approach considers the text as an address to seven historical communities in Asia Minor. Under this interpretation, assertions that "the time is near" are to be taken literally by those communities. Consequently, the work is viewed as a warning not to conform to contemporary Greco-Roman society which John "unveils" as beastly, demonic, and subject to divine judgment.<ref name="Martin 2009">{{cite AV media |author-link=Dale Martin (scholar) |first=Dale |last=Martin |year=2009 |type=lecture |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ9Gt_R5a-k|title=24. Apocalyptic and Accommodation |publisher=[[Yale University]] |via=YouTube |access-date=22 July 2013}} [http://www.cosmolearning.com/video-lectures/apocalyptic-and-accommodation-6817/ Lecture 24 (transcript)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140906132019/http://www.cosmolearning.com/video-lectures/apocalyptic-and-accommodation-6817/ |date=6 September 2014 |last1=Martin|first1=Dale}}</ref>


New Testament narrative criticism also places Revelation in its first century historical context but approaches the book from a literary perspective.{{sfn|Barr|1998}}{{sfn|Barr|2016|pages=376-388}} For example, narrative critics examine characters and characterization, literary devices, settings, plot, themes, point of view, implied reader, implied author, and other constitutive features of narratives in their analysis of the book.
New Testament narrative criticism also places Revelation in its first century historical context but approaches the book from a literary perspective.{{sfn|Barr|1998}}{{sfn|Barr|2016|pages=376-388}} For example, narrative critics examine characters and characterization, literary devices, settings, plot, themes, point of view, implied reader, implied author, and other constitutive features of narratives in their analysis of the book.


Although the acceptance of Revelation into the [[Biblical canon|canon]] has, from the beginning, been controversial, it has been essentially similar to the career of other texts.<ref name="Martin 2009b">{{cite web |url=https://cosmolearning.org/video-lectures/from-stories-to-canon-6796/ |title=Lecture 2: From Stories to Canon |year=2009|publisher=CosmoLearning Religious Studies |access-date=30 July 2016 |archive-date=22 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160822214424/https://cosmolearning.org/video-lectures/from-stories-to-canon-6796/ |url-status=dead |last1=Martin|first1=Dale}}</ref> The eventual exclusion of other contemporary apocalyptic literature from the canon may throw light on the unfolding historical processes of what was officially considered orthodox, what was [[heterodox]], and what was even heretical.<ref name="Martin 2009b"/> Interpretation of meanings and imagery are anchored in what the historical author intended and what his contemporary audience inferred; a message to Christians not to assimilate into the Roman imperial culture was John's central message.<ref name="Martin 2009"/> Thus, the letter (written in the apocalyptic genre) is pastoral in nature (its purpose is offering hope to the downtrodden),<ref name="Ehrman Apoc"/> and the symbolism of Revelation is to be understood entirely within its historical, literary, and social context.<ref name="Ehrman Apoc"/> Critics study the conventions of apocalyptic literature and events of the 1st century to make sense of what the author may have intended.<ref name="Ehrman Apoc">{{cite web|first=Bart D. |last=Ehrman |date=9 June 2016 |title=Bart Ehrman Discusses the Apocalypticist |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE2oaGa2fJU |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/sE2oaGa2fJU |archive-date=2021-10-28|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
Although the acceptance of Revelation into the [[Biblical canon|canon]] has, from the beginning, been controversial, it has been essentially similar to the career of other texts.<ref name="Martin 2009b">{{cite web |url=https://cosmolearning.org/video-lectures/from-stories-to-canon-6796/ |title=Lecture 2: From Stories to Canon |year=2009|publisher=CosmoLearning Religious Studies |access-date=30 July 2016 |archive-date=22 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160822214424/https://cosmolearning.org/video-lectures/from-stories-to-canon-6796/ |url-status=dead |last1=Martin|first1=Dale}}</ref> The eventual exclusion of other contemporary apocalyptic literature from the canon may throw light on the unfolding historical processes of what was officially considered orthodox, what was [[heterodox]], and what was even heretical.<ref name="Martin 2009b"/> Interpretation of meanings and imagery are anchored in what the historical author intended and what his contemporary audience inferred; a message to Christians not to assimilate into the Roman imperial culture was John's central message.<ref name="Martin 2009"/> Thus, the letter (written in the apocalyptic genre) is pastoral in nature (its purpose is offering hope to the downtrodden),<ref name="Ehrman Apoc"/> and the symbolism of Revelation is to be understood entirely within its historical, literary, and social context.<ref name="Ehrman Apoc"/> Critics study the conventions of apocalyptic literature and events of the 1st century to make sense of what the author may have intended.<ref name="Ehrman Apoc">{{cite AV media|first=Bart D. |last=Ehrman |date=9 June 2016 |title=Bart Ehrman Discusses the Apocalypticist |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sE2oaGa2fJU |url-status=live|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211028/sE2oaGa2fJU |archive-date=2021-10-28|via=YouTube}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
 
Scholar [[Barbara Whitlock]] pointed out a similarity between the consistent destruction of thirds depicted in the Book of Revelation (a third of mankind by plagues of fire, smoke, and brimstone, a third of the trees and green grass, a third of the sea creatures and a third of the ships at sea, etc.) and the [[Persian mythology|Iranian mythology]] evil character [[Zahhak]] or Dahāg, depicted in the [[Avesta]], the earliest religious texts of [[Zoroastrianism]]. Dahāg is mentioned as wreaking much evil in the world until at last chained up and imprisoned on the mythical Mt. Damāvand. The Middle Persian sources prophesy that at the end of the world, Dahāg will at last burst his bonds and ravage the world, consuming one in three humans and livestock, until the ancient hero [[Garshasp|Kirsāsp]] returns to life to kill Dahāg. Whitlock wrote: "Zoroastrianism, the state religion of the Roman Empire's main rival, was part of the intellectual environment in which Christianity came into being, just as were Judaism, the Greek-Roman religion, and the worship of Isis and Mithras. A Zoroastrian influence is completely plausible".<ref>{{cite book |first=Barbara |last=Whitlock |title=Tracing out the convoluted sources of Christianity |editor-first=George D. |editor-last=Barnes |series=Collected New Essays in Comparative Religion}}</ref>{{full citation needed|reason=date, publisher, ISBN?|date=September 2024}}


== Old Testament origins ==
== Old Testament origins ==
Much of Revelation employs ancient sources, primarily but not exclusively from the Old Testament. For example, Howard-Brook and Gwyther{{sfn|Howard-Brook|Gwyther|1999|page=76}} regard the [[Book of Enoch]] as an equally significant but contextually different source. "Enoch's journey has no close parallel in the Hebrew scriptures."
Much of Revelation employs ancient sources, primarily but not exclusively from the Old Testament. For example, Howard-Brook and Gwyther{{sfn|Howard-Brook|Gwyther|1999|page=76}} regard the [[Book of Enoch]] as an equally significant but contextually different source. "Enoch's journey has no close parallel in the Hebrew scriptures."


Academics showed little interest in this topic until recently.{{efn|Steve Moyise reports no work whatsoever done between 1912 and 1984.{{sfn|Moyise|1995|p=13}}}} An anonymous Scottish commentary of 1871<ref>Anon ''An exposition of the Apocalypse on a new principle of literal interpretation'' Aberdeen: Brown (1871)</ref> prefaces Revelation 4 with the Little Apocalypse of Mark 13, places Malachi 4:5 ("Behold I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord") within Revelation 11 and writes Revelation 12:7 side by side with the role of "the Satan" in the [[Book of Job]]. The message is that everything in Revelation will happen in its previously appointed time.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Chapman |first=Charles T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qPAiFCpfNUEC&q=The+message+is+that+everything+in+Revelation+will+happen+in+its+previously+appointed+time&pg=PA12|title=The Message of the Book of Revelation |date=1995 |publisher=Liturgical Press |isbn=978-0-8146-2111-0 |language=en}}</ref>
English-language academics showed little interest in this topic until recently.{{efn|Steve Moyise reports no work whatsoever done between 1912 and 1984.{{sfn|Moyise|1995|p=13}}}} A Scottish commentary from 1871<ref>{{Citation|author-first1=David |author-last1=Shirres |title=An exposition of the Apocalypse on a new principle of literal interpretation|location=Aberdeen|publisher=Brown |year=1871}}</ref> prefaces Revelation 4 with the Little Apocalypse of Mark 13, places Malachi 4:5 ("Behold I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord") within Revelation 11 and writes Revelation 12:7 side by side with the role of "the Satan" in the [[Book of Job]]. The message is that everything in Revelation will happen in its previously appointed time.{{sfn|Chapman|1995}}


[[Steve Moyise]] uses the index of the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament to show that "Revelation contains more Old Testament [[allusion]]s than any other New Testament book, but it does not record a single quotation."{{sfn|Moyise|1995|p=31}} Perhaps significantly, Revelation chooses different sources than other New Testament books. Revelation concentrates on Isaiah, Psalms, and Ezekiel, while neglecting, comparatively speaking, the books of the Pentateuch that are the dominant sources for other New Testament writers.{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}}
New Testament scholar Steve Moyise used the index of the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament to show that "Revelation contains more Old Testament [[allusion]]s than any other New Testament book, but it does not record a single quotation." Perhaps significantly, Revelation chooses different sources than other New Testament books. Revelation concentrates on Isaiah, Psalms, and Ezekiel, while neglecting, comparatively speaking, the books of the Pentateuch that are the dominant sources for other New Testament writers. {{sfn|Moyise|1995|p=31}}


Yet, with Revelation, the problems might be judged more fundamental. The author seems to be using his sources in a completely different way to the originals. For example, the author borrows the 'new temple' imagery of Ezekiel 40–48 but uses it to describe a New Jerusalem which, quite pointedly, no longer needs a temple because it is God's dwelling. [[Ian Boxall]]{{sfn|Boxall|2006a|page=254}} writes that Revelation "is no montage of biblical quotations (that is not John's way) but a wealth of allusions and evocations rewoven into something new and creative." In trying to identify this "something new", Boxall argues that Ezekiel provides the 'backbone' for Revelation. He sets out a comparative table listing the chapters of Revelation in sequence and linking most of them to the structurally corresponding chapter in Ezekiel. The interesting point is that the order is not the same. John, on this theory, rearranges Ezekiel to suit his own purposes.{{Citation needed|date=October 2016}}
Yet, with Revelation, the problems might be judged more fundamental. The author seems to be using his sources in a completely different way to the originals. For example, the author borrows the 'new temple' imagery of Ezekiel 40–48 but uses it to describe a New Jerusalem which, quite pointedly, no longer needs a temple because it is God's dwelling. New Testament scholar Ian Boxall writes that Revelation "is no montage of biblical quotations (that is not John's way) but a wealth of allusions and evocations rewoven into something new and creative." In trying to identify this "something new", Boxall argues that Ezekiel provides the 'backbone' for Revelation. He sets out a comparative table listing the chapters of Revelation in sequence and linking most of them to the structurally corresponding chapter in Ezekiel. The interesting point is that the order is not the same. John, on this theory, rearranges Ezekiel to suit his own purposes.{{sfn|Boxall|2006a|page=254}}


Some commentators argue that it is these purposes – and not the structure – that really matter. [[Gregory Beale|G. K. Beale]] believes that, however much John makes use of Ezekiel, his ultimate purpose is to present Revelation as a fulfillment of [[Daniel 7]].<ref>G. K. Beale John's use of the Old Testament in Revelation Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press (1998) p. 109</ref> [[Richard Bauckham]] has argued that John presents an early view of the Trinity through his descriptions of the visions and his identifying Jesus and the Holy Spirit with YHWH.{{sfn|Bauckham|1993|p=}} Brandon Smith has expanded on both of their proposals while proposing a "trinitarian reading" of Revelation, arguing that John uses Old Testament language and allusions from various sources to describe a multiplicity of persons in YHWH without sacrificing monotheism, which would later be codified in the trinitarian doctrine of [[Nicene Christianity]].{{sfn|Smith|2022}}{{page needed|date=May 2025}}
Some commentators argue that it is these purposes – and not the structure – that really matter. New Testament scholar [[Gregory Beale|G. K. Beale]] believes that, however much John makes use of Ezekiel, his ultimate purpose is to present Revelation as a fulfillment of [[Daniel 7]].<ref>{{Cite book|author-first1=G. K. |author-last1=Beale|title=John's use of the Old Testament in Revelation|location=Sheffield|publisher=Sheffield Academic Press|year=1998|page=109}}</ref> New Testament scholar [[Richard Bauckham]] has argued that John presents an early view of the Trinity through his descriptions of the visions and his identifying Jesus and the Holy Spirit with YHWH.{{sfn|Bauckham|1993|p=}} New Testament scholar Brandon Smith has expanded on both of their proposals while proposing a "trinitarian reading" of Revelation, arguing that John uses Old Testament language and allusions from various sources to describe a multiplicity of persons in YHWH without sacrificing monotheism, which would later be codified in the trinitarian doctrine of [[Nicene Christianity]].{{sfn|Smith|2022}}{{page needed|date=May 2025}}


== Olivet discourse ==
== Olivet discourse ==
Line 361: Line 361:


== Figures in Revelation ==
== Figures in Revelation ==
{{See also|Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse}}
In order of appearance:
In order of appearance:
{{Div col|colwidth=30em}}
{{Div col|colwidth=30em}}
# The author (see [[John the Apostle]] or [[John of Patmos]])
# The author (see [[John the Apostle]] or [[John of Patmos]])
# One like the Son of Man who gives the revelation
# One like the Son of Man who gives the revelation
# Antipas, the faithful martyr ([[Antipas of Pergamum]])
# [[Antipas of Pergamum]], the faithful martyr
# [[Nicolaitans]]
# [[Nicolaitans]]
# [[Jezebel]]
# [[Jezebel]]
Line 384: Line 385:
# The angel of the bottomless pit (Hebrew: [[Abaddon]], Greek: Apollyon)
# The angel of the bottomless pit (Hebrew: [[Abaddon]], Greek: Apollyon)
# Four angels bound to the great river [[Euphrates]]
# Four angels bound to the great river [[Euphrates]]
# Two hundred million man [[cavalry]]
# Two hundred million man [[cavalry]]
# The mighty angel with little book open and when he cried of seven thunders uttered their voices
# The mighty angel with little book open and when he cried of seven thunders uttered their voices
# [[The Two Witnesses]]
# [[The Two Witnesses]]
Line 441: Line 442:
== Bibliography ==
== Bibliography ==
{{refbegin}}
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite book |author1-last=Aland |author1-first=Kurt |author1-link=Kurt Aland |author2-last=Aland |author2-first=Barbara |year=1995 |title=The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2pYDsAhUOxAC&pg=PA159 |url-status=live |location=[[Grand Rapids, Michigan]] |publisher=[[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company|Wm. B. Eerdmans]] |edition=2nd |translator-last=Rhodes |translator-first=Erroll F. |isbn=978-0-8028-4098-1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231005232815/https://books.google.com/books?id=2pYDsAhUOxAC |archive-date=October 5, 2023}}
*{{cite book |author1-last=Aland |author1-first=Kurt |author1-link=Kurt Aland |author2-last=Aland |author2-first=Barbara| author2-link = Barbara Aland |year=1995 |title=The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2pYDsAhUOxAC&pg=PA159 |url-status=live |location=[[Grand Rapids, Michigan]] |publisher=[[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company|Wm. B. Eerdmans]] |edition=2nd |translator-last=Rhodes |translator-first=Erroll F. |isbn=978-0-8028-4098-1|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231005232815/https://books.google.com/books?id=2pYDsAhUOxAC |archive-date=October 5, 2023}}
*{{Cite book
*{{Cite book
|last = Ammannati
|last = Ammannati
Line 448: Line 449:
|publisher = Transeuropa
|publisher = Transeuropa
|year = 2010
|year = 2010
|language = it
}}
}}
* {{cite book |last=Allen |first=Garrick |year=2020 |title=Manuscripts of the book of Revelation: new philology, paratexts, reception |location=[[Oxford]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=9780191883323}}
* {{cite book |last=Allen |first=Garrick |year=2020 |title=Manuscripts of the book of Revelation: new philology, paratexts, reception |location=[[Oxford]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=9780191883323}}
* {{cite book |author=[[Andreas of Caesarea]] |year=2011 |title=The Fathers of the Church: Commentary on the Apocalypse |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AmMEhsEYHUsC&pg=PA3 |translator-last=Constantinou |translator-first=Eugenia Scarvelis |location=[[Washington, D.C.]] |publisher=[[The Catholic University of America Press]] |isbn=978-0-8132-0123-8}}
* {{cite book |author=[[Andreas of Caesarea]] |year=2011 |title=The Fathers of the Church: Commentary on the Apocalypse |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AmMEhsEYHUsC&pg=PA3 |translator-last=Constantinou |translator-first=Eugenia Scarvelis |location=[[Washington, D.C.]] |publisher=[[The Catholic University of America Press]] |isbn=978-0-8132-0123-8}}
* {{cite book |first=David L. |last=Barr |title=Tales of the End: A Narrative Commentary on the Book of Revelation |location=Santa Rosa |publisher=Polebridge Press |year=1998|ISBN=978-1-59815-033-9}}
* {{cite book |first=David L. |last=Barr |title=Tales of the End: A Narrative Commentary on the Book of Revelation |location=Santa Rosa |publisher=Polebridge Press |year=1998|isbn=978-1-59815-033-9}}
* {{cite book |last=Barr |first=David L. |chapter=Narrative Technique in the Book of Revelation |title=Oxford Handbook of Biblical Narrative |editor-first=Danna Nolan |editor-last=Fewell |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2016}}
* {{cite book |last=Barr |first=David L. |chapter=Narrative Technique in the Book of Revelation |title=Oxford Handbook of Biblical Narrative |editor-first=Danna Nolan |editor-last=Fewell |location=Oxford |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2016}}
* Bass, Ralph E. Jr. (2004). ''Back to the Future: A Study in the Book of Revelation'', Greenville, South Carolina: Living Hope Press, {{ISBN|0-9759547-0-9}}.
* Bass, Ralph E. Jr. (2004). ''Back to the Future: A Study in the Book of Revelation'', Greenville, South Carolina: Living Hope Press, {{ISBN|0-9759547-0-9}}.
Line 483: Line 485:
*{{cite book|title=[[s:The Apocalypse of St. John|The Apocalypse of St. John]]|year=1921|publisher=The Catholic Church Supply House|first=Rev. Elwood|last=Berry}}
*{{cite book|title=[[s:The Apocalypse of St. John|The Apocalypse of St. John]]|year=1921|publisher=The Catholic Church Supply House|first=Rev. Elwood|last=Berry}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Best |author-first=Garrett Evan |year=2025 |chapter=Imitatio Ezechielis: John’s Prophetic Exemplar and His Unusual Style |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=itBJEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA114 |title=Imitatio Ezechielis: the Irregular Grammar of Revelation Reconsidered |location=[[Leiden]] and [[Boston]] |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |series=Biblical Interpretation Series |volume=226 |pages=114–236 |doi=10.1163/9789004716056_005 |isbn=978-90-04-71605-6 |lccn=2024950905}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Best |author-first=Garrett Evan |year=2025 |chapter=Imitatio Ezechielis: John’s Prophetic Exemplar and His Unusual Style |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=itBJEQAAQBAJ&pg=PA114 |title=Imitatio Ezechielis: the Irregular Grammar of Revelation Reconsidered |location=[[Leiden]] and [[Boston]] |publisher=[[Brill Publishers]] |series=Biblical Interpretation Series |volume=226 |pages=114–236 |doi=10.1163/9789004716056_005 |isbn=978-90-04-71605-6 |lccn=2024950905}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Boring |author-first=M. Eugene |year=2011 |origyear=1989 |title=Revelation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BDQOcCrYFuEC&pg=PA3 |location=[[Louisville, Kentucky]] |publisher=[[Westminster John Knox Press]] |series=Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching |isbn=978-0-664-23628-1 |access-date=2019-06-29 }}
* {{cite book |author-last=Boring |author-first=M. Eugene |year=2011 |orig-date=1989 |title=Revelation |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BDQOcCrYFuEC&pg=PA3 |location=[[Louisville, Kentucky]] |publisher=[[Westminster John Knox Press]] |series=Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching |isbn=978-0-664-23628-1 |access-date=2019-06-29 }}
* [[Wilhelm Bousset|Bousset W.]], ''Die Offenbarung Johannis'', Göttingen 1896<sup>5</sup>, 1906<sup>6</sup>.
* [[Wilhelm Bousset|Bousset W.]], ''Die Offenbarung Johannis'', Göttingen 1896<sup>5</sup>, 1906<sup>6</sup>.
* {{cite book |first=Ken |last=Bowers |title=Hiding in plain sight |publisher=Cedar Fort |year=2000 }}
* {{cite book |first=Ken |last=Bowers |title=Hiding in plain sight |publisher=Cedar Fort |year=2000 }}
* {{cite book |author-last=Boxall |author-first=Ian |year=2013a |chapter=‘I was on the Island Called Patmos’: Re-reading Rev. 1:9 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GlMQCvBhjOIC&pg=PA14 |title=Patmos in the Reception History of the Apocalypse |location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674206.003.0002 |isbn=9780191752230}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Boxall |author-first=Ian |year=2013a |chapter=‘I was on the Island Called Patmos’: Re-reading Rev. 1:9 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GlMQCvBhjOIC&pg=PA14 |title=Patmos in the Reception History of the Apocalypse |pages=14–27 |location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674206.003.0002 |isbn=9780191752230}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Boxall |author-first=Ian |year=2013b|chapter=Patmos in Early Patristic Tradition (2nd–5th Centuries) |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GlMQCvBhjOIC&pg=PA28 |title=Patmos in the Reception History of the Apocalypse |location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674206.003.0003 |isbn=9780191752230}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Boxall |author-first=Ian |year=2013b|chapter=Patmos in Early Patristic Tradition (2nd–5th Centuries) |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GlMQCvBhjOIC&pg=PA28 |title=Patmos in the Reception History of the Apocalypse |pages=28–55 |location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|doi=10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674206.003.0003 |isbn=9780191752230}}
* {{cite book|last1=Boxall|first1=Ian|year=2006a|title=The Revelation of Saint John|series=Black's New Testament Commentary|location=Peabody, Massachusetts|publisher=Hendrickson|ISBN=1-56563-202-8}}
* {{cite book|last1=Boxall|first1=Ian|year=2006a|title=The Revelation of Saint John|series=Black's New Testament Commentary|location=Peabody, Massachusetts|publisher=Hendrickson|isbn=1-56563-202-8}}
* {{cite book|last1=Boxall|first1=Ian|year=2006b|title=The Revelation of Saint John|series=Black's New Testament Commentary|location=London|publisher=Continuum|ISBN=0-8264-7135-8}}
* {{cite book|last1=Boxall|first1=Ian|year=2006b|title=The Revelation of Saint John|series=Black's New Testament Commentary|location=London|publisher=Continuum|isbn=0-8264-7135-8}}
* Boxall, Ian (2002). ''Revelation: Vision and Insight – An Introduction to the Apocalypse'', London: SPCK {{ISBN|0-281-05362-6}}
* Boxall, Ian (2002). ''Revelation: Vision and Insight – An Introduction to the Apocalypse'', London: SPCK {{ISBN|0-281-05362-6}}
*{{cite book |last1=Breu |first1=Clarissa |title=Biblical Exegesis without Authorial Intention?: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Authorship and Meaning |date=2019 |publisher=BRILL |location=Leiden |isbn=978-90-04-39581-7}}
*{{cite book |last1=Breu |first1=Clarissa |title=Biblical Exegesis without Authorial Intention?: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Authorship and Meaning |date=2019 |publisher=BRILL |location=Leiden |isbn=978-90-04-39581-7}}
Line 503: Line 505:
}}
}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Carson |author-first=Don |year=2005 |title=An Introduction to the New Testament |location=[[Grand Rapids, Michigan]] |publisher=[[Zondervan]] |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-310-51940-9}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Carson |author-first=Don |year=2005 |title=An Introduction to the New Testament |location=[[Grand Rapids, Michigan]] |publisher=[[Zondervan]] |edition=2nd |isbn=978-0-310-51940-9}}
*{{Cite book|last=Chapman |first=Charles T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qPAiFCpfNUEC&q=The+message+is+that+everything+in+Revelation+will+happen+in+its+previously+appointed+time&pg=PA12|title=The Message of the Book of Revelation |date=1995 |publisher=Liturgical Press |isbn=978-0-8146-2111-0 |language=en}}
*{{cite book |title=Christian Anarchism: A Political Commentary on the Gospel |last=Christoyannopoulos |first=Alexandre |author-link=Alexandre Christoyannopoulos |year=2010 |publisher=Imprint Academic |location=Exeter}}  
*{{cite book |title=Christian Anarchism: A Political Commentary on the Gospel |last=Christoyannopoulos |first=Alexandre |author-link=Alexandre Christoyannopoulos |year=2010 |publisher=Imprint Academic |location=Exeter}}  
*{{Cite book
*{{Cite book
Line 570: Line 573:
}}
}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Holmes |author-first=Michael |year=2007 |title=The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations |location=[[Ada, Michigan]] |publisher=[[Baker Academic]] |isbn=978-0801034688}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Holmes |author-first=Michael |year=2007 |title=The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations |location=[[Ada, Michigan]] |publisher=[[Baker Academic]] |isbn=978-0801034688}}
* {{cite book|last1=Hudson|first1=Gary W. |year=2006|title=Revelation: Awakening The Christ Within|publisher=Vesica Press|ISBN=0-9778517-2-9}}
* {{cite book|last1=Hudson|first1=Gary W. |year=2006|title=Revelation: Awakening The Christ Within|publisher=Vesica Press|isbn=0-9778517-2-9}}
* {{cite book|title=Unveiling Empire: Reading Revelation Then and Now|last1= Howard-Brook|first1=Wes|last2=Gwyther |first2=Anthony|publisher=[[Orbis Books]]|year=1999|isbn=978-1-57075-287-2}}
* {{cite book|title=Unveiling Empire: Reading Revelation Then and Now|last1= Howard-Brook|first1=Wes|last2=Gwyther |first2=Anthony|publisher=[[Orbis Books]]|year=1999|isbn=978-1-57075-287-2}}
* {{cite journal |last1=Jeffcoat Schedtler |first1=Justin P. |editor-first1=Craig R. |editor-last1=Koester |title=The Hymns in Revelation |journal=The Oxford Handbook of the Book of Revelation |date=10 September 2020|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190655433.013.7|isbn=978-0-19-065543-3 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Jeffcoat Schedtler |first1=Justin P. |editor-first1=Craig R. |editor-last1=Koester |title=The Hymns in Revelation |journal=The Oxford Handbook of the Book of Revelation |date=10 September 2020|pages=114–130 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190655433.013.7|isbn=978-0-19-065543-3 }}
* {{cite book|last1=Jennings|first1=Charles A. |year=2001|title=The Book of Revelation From An Israelite and Historicist Interpretation|publisher=Truth in History Publications|ISBN=978-0-9792565-8-5}}
* {{cite book|last1=Jennings|first1=Charles A. |year=2001|title=The Book of Revelation From An Israelite and Historicist Interpretation|publisher=Truth in History Publications|isbn=978-0-9792565-8-5}}
*{{Cite book
*{{Cite book
  | last =Johnson
  | last =Johnson
Line 648: Line 651:
}}
}}
* [[Elaine Pagels|Pagels, Elaine]] (2012). ''Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation'', Viking Adult, {{ISBN|0-670-02334-5}}
* [[Elaine Pagels|Pagels, Elaine]] (2012). ''Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation'', Viking Adult, {{ISBN|0-670-02334-5}}
* Prigent P., ''L'Apocalypse'', Paris 1981.
* {{Cite book|first1=Pierre |last1=Prigent |title=L'Apocalypse de saint Jean|year=1981}}
*{{cite book |first=Tina |last=Pippin |title=Death & Desire: The rhetoric of gender in the Apocalypse of John |location=Louisville |publisher=Westminster-John Knox |year=1993 }}
*{{cite book |first=Tina |last=Pippin |title=Death & Desire: The rhetoric of gender in the Apocalypse of John |location=Louisville |publisher=Westminster-John Knox |year=1993 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Weor |first=Samael Aun |author-link=Samael Aun Weor | title=The Aquarian Message: Gnostic Kabbalah and Tarot in the Apocalypse of St. John | publisher=Thelema Press | orig-date=1960 | year=2004 | isbn=978-0-9745916-5-0}}
* {{Cite book |last=Weor |first=Samael Aun |author-link=Samael Aun Weor | title=The Aquarian Message: Gnostic Kabbalah and Tarot in the Apocalypse of St. John | publisher=Thelema Press | orig-date=1960 | year=2004 | isbn=978-0-9745916-5-0}}
Line 660: Line 663:
|isbn = 978-1-4412-3655-5  
|isbn = 978-1-4412-3655-5  
}}
}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Paul |author-first=Ian |year=2020 |chapter=Introduction to the Book of Revelation |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CFjPDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA36 |editor-last=McAllister |editor-first=Colin |title=The Cambridge Companion to Apocalyptic Literature |location=[[Cambridge]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |doi=10.1017/9781108394994.003 |isbn=9780191752230 |lccn=2019042577}}
* {{cite book |author-last=Paul |author-first=Ian |year=2020 |chapter=Introduction to the Book of Revelation |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CFjPDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA36 |editor-last=McAllister |editor-first=Colin |title=The Cambridge Companion to Apocalyptic Literature |pages=36–58 |location=[[Cambridge]] and [[New York City|New York]] |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |doi=10.1017/9781108394994.003 |isbn=9780191752230 |lccn=2019042577}}
* {{cite book
* {{cite book
| last = Perkins
| last = Perkins
Line 678: Line 681:
|isbn = 9780511414190
|isbn = 9780511414190
}}
}}
*{{cite book |last1=Parry |first1=Marilyn |title=The Significance of the Book of Revelation to the Development of the Liturgy (PhD thesis) |date=2000 |publisher=University of Manchester}}
*{{cite book |first=James M. |last=Pryse |title=Apocalypse Unsealed |location=London |publisher=Watkins |year=1910}}
*{{cite book |first=James M. |last=Pryse |title=Apocalypse Unsealed |location=London |publisher=Watkins |year=1910}}
*{{cite book |last1=Ratzinger |first1=Joseph |title=Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith: The Church As Communion |date=2005 |publisher=Ignatius Press |location=San Francisco |isbn=978-0898709636 |edition=1st}}
*{{cite book |last1=Ratzinger |first1=Joseph |title=Pilgrim Fellowship of Faith: The Church As Communion |date=2005 |publisher=Ignatius Press |location=San Francisco |isbn=978-0898709636 |edition=1st}}
Line 694: Line 698:
|year = 1990
|year = 1990
}}
}}
* {{cite book|author-link=Massey H. Shepherd|author-last1=Shepherd|author-first1=Massey H. |year=2004|title=The Paschal Liturgy and the Apocalypse|publisher=James Clarke|ISBN=0-227-17005-9}}
* {{cite book|author-link=Massey H. Shepherd|author-last1=Shepherd|author-first1=Massey H. |year=2004|title=The Paschal Liturgy and the Apocalypse|publisher=James Clarke|isbn=0-227-17005-9}}
*{{Cite book
*{{Cite book
|last = Schnelle
|last = Schnelle
Line 762: Line 766:
|isbn = 978-1-4412-3655-5
|isbn = 978-1-4412-3655-5
}}
}}
*{{cite book |last1=Westermeyer |first1=Paul |editor-first1=Craig R. |editor-last1=Koester |chapter=The Book of Revelation in Music and Liturgy |title=The Oxford Handbook of the Book of Revelation |date=10 September 2020|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190655433.013.25|isbn=978-0-19-065543-3 }}
*{{cite book |last1=Westermeyer |first1=Paul |editor-first1=Craig R. |editor-last1=Koester |chapter=The Book of Revelation in Music and Liturgy |title=The Oxford Handbook of the Book of Revelation |date=10 September 2020|pages=430–446 |doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190655433.013.25|isbn=978-0-19-065543-3 }}
* {{cite book|title=Counsels for the Church|chapter-url=https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/19.422|chapter=Chapter 7|author-first1=Ellen G. |author-last1=White|publisher=White Estate|isbn=978-1-61253-019-2|year=1991}}
* {{cite book|title=Counsels for the Church|chapter-url=https://m.egwwritings.org/en/book/19.422|chapter=Chapter 7|author-first1=Ellen G. |author-last1=White|publisher=White Estate|isbn=978-1-61253-019-2|year=1991}}
* Wikenhauser, A. ''Offenbarung des Johannes'', Regensburg 1947, 1959.
* {{Cite book|last=Wikenhauser|first=A. |title=Offenbarung des Johannes|location=Regensburg|orig-year=1947|year=1959}}
* Witherington, Ben III (2003). ''Revelation'', The New Cambridge Bible Commentary, New York: Cambridge University Press, {{ISBN|978-0-521-00068-0}}.
* {{Cite book|last1=Witherington |first1=Ben III |year=2003|chapter=Revelation|title=The New Cambridge Bible Commentary|location=New York|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-00068-0}}
* {{cite book|editor-link=Theodor Zahn|editor-last1=Zahn|editor-first1=Theodor|title=Die Offenbarung des Johannes|others=t. 1–2|location=Leipzig|publisher=A. Deichertsche Verlagsbuchhandlung|year=1924–1926}}
* {{cite book|editor-link=Theodor Zahn|editor-last1=Zahn|editor-first1=Theodor|title=Die Offenbarung des Johannes|others=t. 1–2|location=Leipzig|publisher=A. Deichertsche Verlagsbuchhandlung|year=1924–1926}}
*{{cite journal |first=Beniamin |last=Zakhary |year=2022 |title=Support For The Biblical Liturgy of Revelation in the Coptic Tradition |journal=Doxology |volume=33 |number=4 |url=https://zenodo.org/records/8060812 |doi=10.5281/zenodo.8060812}}
{{refend}}
{{refend}}


Line 797: Line 802:
* {{Wikisource-inline|list=
* {{Wikisource-inline|list=
** {{Cite CE1913 |last=Biesen |first=C. van den |wstitle=Apocalypse|short=x |noicon=x}}
** {{Cite CE1913 |last=Biesen |first=C. van den |wstitle=Apocalypse|short=x |noicon=x}}
** {{Cite EB1911 |last=Charles |first=Robert Henry |authorlink=Robert Charles (scholar) |wstitle=Revelation, Book of |short=x |noicon=x}}
** {{Cite AmCyc |last=Schem |first=A. J. |authorlink=A. J. Schem |wstitle=Apocalypse |short=x |noicon=x}}
** {{Cite AmCyc |last=Schem |first=A. J. |authorlink=A. J. Schem |wstitle=Apocalypse |short=x |noicon=x}}
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0054914 The Apocalypse], BBC Radio 4 discussion with Martin Palmer, Marina Benjamin & Justin Champion (''In Our Time'', 17 July 2003)
* [http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0054914 The Apocalypse], BBC Radio 4 discussion with Martin Palmer, Marina Benjamin & Justin Champion (''In Our Time'', 17 July 2003)
Line 804: Line 810:
{{S-hou|Apocalyptic Epistle|||}}
{{S-hou|Apocalyptic Epistle|||}}
{{s-bef|before=<small>[[General epistles|General]] [[Epistles|Epistle]]<br>of</small><br> [[Epistle of Jude|Jude]]}}
{{s-bef|before=<small>[[General epistles|General]] [[Epistles|Epistle]]<br>of</small><br> [[Epistle of Jude|Jude]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=<small>[[New Testament]]</small><br />[[Books of the Bible]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=<small>[[New Testament]]</small><br>[[Books of the Bible]]}}
{{s-non|reason=End}}
{{s-non|reason=End}}
{{s-end}}
{{s-end}}

Latest revision as of 18:48, 16 November 2025

Template:Short description Template:Hatnote group Template:Use dmy dates

File:Dublin, Chester Beatty Ms Chester Beatty III Papyrus 47 fol. 7r Rev 13,16-14.jpg
Revelation 13:16–14:4 on Papyrus 47 (recto; Template:Circa)Template:Sfn

Template:Sidebar with collapsible lists Template:John Template:Christian Eschatology

The Book of Revelation, also known as the Book of the Apocalypse or the Apocalypse of John,Template:Sfn is canonically the last book of the New Testament. Written in Greek, its title is derived from the first word of the text, apocalypse (Template:Langx), which means "revelation" or "unveiling".Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn The Book of Revelation is the only apocalyptic book in the New Testament canon,Template:Efn and occupies a central place in Christian eschatology.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn

The book spans three literary genres: the epistolary, the apocalyptic, and the prophetic.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn It begins with John, on the island of Patmos in the Aegean Sea, addressing letters to the "Seven Churches of Asia" with exhortations from Christ.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn He then describes a series of prophetic and symbolic visions, which would culminate in the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn These visions include figures such as a Woman clothed with the sun with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars, the Serpent, the Seven-Headed Dragon, and the Beast.Template:Sfn

The author names himself as simply "John" in the text,Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn but his precise identity remains a point of academic debate.Template:Efn The sometimes obscure and extravagant imagery of Revelation, with many allusions and numeric symbolism derived from the Old Testament, has allowed a wide variety of Christian interpretations throughout the history of Christianity.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Modern biblical scholarship views Revelation as a first-century apocalyptic message warning early Christian communities not to assimilate into Roman imperial culture, interpreting its vivid symbolism through historical, literary, and cultural lenses.[1][2][3]

Composition and setting

Title, authorship, and date

File:London, British Library Ms Papyrus 2053 - POxy1079 (Papyrus 18) verso Revelation 1, 4–7.jpg
Revelation 1:4–7 on Papyrus 18 (Template:Circa)Template:Sfn

The book's most common English name is "[Book of] Revelation". It is also called "[Book of] the Apocalypse" (for example in the Roman Catholic Church),Template:Sfn "Revelation to John",[4] or "Apocalypse of St. John".[5] Abbreviations of these are "Rev." (traditional), "Rv" (shorter), or "Apoc."[6][7] These names are derived from the incipit to the text (Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".):Template:Sfn

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Lang".

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place; he made it known by sending his angel to his servant John.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

"Revelation" and "Apocalypse" are respectively a translation and an anglicisation of the original Koinē Greek word Script error: No such module "Lang"., which can also mean "unveiling".Template:Sfn In the original Greek, the word is singular, so the name "Revelations" sometimes found in English is often considered erroneous.[2]

The author names himself as simply "John" in the text,Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn and states in Script error: No such module "Bibleverse". that he is on the island of Patmos, and so he is conventionally called "John of Patmos".Template:Sfn He was a Jewish–Christian prophet, probably belonging to a group of such prophets, and was accepted by the congregations to whom he addressed his letter.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The New Testament canon has four other "Johannine works" ascribed to authors named John, and a tradition dating from Irenaeus (Template:Circa AD) identifies John the Apostle as the author of all five. The modern academic consensus is that a Johannine community produced the Gospel of John and the three Johannine epistles, while John of Patmos wrote the Book of Revelation separately.Template:EfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn

The Book of Revelation is commonly dated to about 95 AD, as suggested by clues in the visions pointing to the reign of the Roman Emperor Domitian (81–96),Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn The Beast with seven heads and the number 666 seem to allude directly to the Emperor Nero (reigned 54–68), but this does not imply that the book was written in the 60s,Template:Sfn as there was a widespread belief in later decades that Nero would return.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Genre

File:BibleSPaoloFol331vFrontRev.jpg
Frontispiece to the Book of Revelation, Bible of San Paolo fuori le Mura, 9th century
File:Schnorr von Carolsfeld Bibel in Bildern 1860 236.png
The Vision of John on Patmos, woodcut by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld (1860)

The Book of Revelation is an apocalyptic prophecy, with an epistolary introduction addressed to the "Seven Churches" of Asia Minor.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn The seven cities where these churches were located are close together, and the island of Patmos is near the western coast of the Anatolian Peninsula.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn The first word of the text, apocalypse (Template:Langx, translit. apokálypsis), which means "revelation" or "unveiling",Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn refers to the revealing of divine mysteries;Template:Sfn John is to write down what is revealed (what he sees in his vision) and send it to the seven churches.Template:Sfn The entire book constitutes the prophecy—the letters to the seven individual churches are introductions to the rest of the book, which is addressed to all seven.Template:Sfn While the dominant genre is apocalyptic, the author sees himself as a Christian prophet: Revelation uses the word in various forms 21 times, more than any other New Testament book.Template:Sfn

Sources

File:ApocalypseStSeverFol026vJohnRecievesRev.jpg
St. John receives his Revelation, Saint-Sever Beatus, 11th century
File:Johannes op Patmos Saint John on Patmos Berlin, Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin, Gemaldegalerie HR.jpg
St. John the Evangelist on Patmos, painting by Hieronymous Bosch, Template:Circa

The predominant view is that Revelation alludes to the Old Testament, although it is difficult among scholars to agree on the exact number of allusions or the allusions themselves.Template:Sfn Revelation rarely quotes directly from the Old Testament, yet its composition alludes to or echoes ideas in older Hebrew scriptures.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Over half of the references stem from Daniel, Ezekiel, Psalms, Isaiah, and Zechariah, with Daniel providing the largest number in proportion to length and Ezekiel standing out as the most influential.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn Because these references appear as allusions rather than as quotes, it is difficult to know whether the author used the Hebrew or the Greek version of the Hebrew scriptures, but he was often influenced by the Greek.Template:Sfn

Setting

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Modern understanding has been that the Book of Revelation was written to comfort beleaguered Christians as they underwent religious persecution at the hands of a Roman Emperor.Template:Sfn This is not the only interpretation, however; Domitian may not have been a cruel despot imposing the Roman imperial cult upon his subjects, and there may not have been any systematic empire-wide persecution of Christians in his time.Template:Sfn Revelation may instead have been composed in the context of an existential conflict within the early Christian communities of Asia Minor over whether to engage with, or withdraw from, the far larger non-Christian world. Mark B. Stephens argues that the Book of Revelation chastised those Christians who wanted to reach an accommodation with the Roman State.Template:Sfn This is not to say that Christians in Asia Minor were not suffering due to withdrawal from and defiance of the wider Roman society, which imposed very real penalties; Revelation offered a victory over this reality by offering an apocalyptic hope. In the words of professor Adela Yarbro Collins, "What ought to be was experienced as a present reality."Template:SfnTemplate:Clarify

Canonical history

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote".

Revelation was among the last books accepted into the Christian biblical canon, and to the present day some churches that derive from the Church of the East reject it.Template:SfnTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn Eastern Christians became skeptical of the book as doubts concerning its authorship and unusual styleTemplate:SfnTemplate:Sfn were reinforced by aversion to its acceptance by Montanists and other groups considered to be heretical.Template:Sfn This distrust of the Book of Revelation persisted in the Christian East for a long time,Template:Sfn through the 15th century.Template:Sfn

Dionysius (Template:Circa), bishop of Alexandria and disciple of Origen, wrote that the Book of Revelation could have been written by Cerinthus, although he himself did not adopt the view that Cerinthus was its writer. He regarded the Apocalypse as the work of an inspired Christian, but not of John the Apostle.[8] Similarly, Eusebius of Caesarea in his Church History (Template:Circa) argues that the Book of Revelation was accepted as a canonical book by some early Church Fathers and rejected as spurious by others at the same time.Template:Sfn[9]

The Book of Revelation is counted as both accepted and disputed, which has caused some confusion over what exactly Eusebius meant by doing so.Template:Sfn The disputation can perhaps be attributed to Origen,[10] who seems to have accepted it in his writings.[11] Cyril of Jerusalem (Template:Circa) does not name it among the canonical books (Catechesis IV.33–36).[12] Athanasius of Alexandria (Template:Circa) in his Letter 39,[13] Augustine of Hippo (Template:Circa) in his book On Christian Doctrine (Book II, Chapter 8),[14] Tyrannius Rufinus (Template:Circa) in his Commentary on the Apostles' Creed,[15] Pope Innocent I (Template:Circa) in a letter to the bishop of Toulouse,[16] and John of Damascus (Template:Circa) in his work An Exposition of the Orthodox Faith (Book IV:7)[17] listed "the Revelation of John the Evangelist" as a canonical book.

Synods

The Council of Laodicea (363) omitted it as a canonical book.[18]

The Latin text Script error: No such module "Lang"., written by an anonymous scholar between 519 and 553, contains a list of books of scripture presented as having been reckoned as canonical by the Council of Rome (382). This list mentions it as a part of the New Testament canon.[19]

The Synod of Hippo (393),[20] followed by the First Council of Carthage (397), the Second Council of Carthage (419), the Council of Florence (1442),[21] and the Council of Trent (1546),[22] classified it as a canonical book.[23]

The Apostolic Canons, approved by the Eastern Orthodox Council in Trullo in 692, but rejected by Pope Sergius I, omit it.[24]

Protestant Reformation

Biblical criticism and doubts on the biblical canon resurfaced among Renaissance scholars and Christian theologians during the 16th-century Protestant Reformation. Former Augustinian friar and German reformer Martin Luther called Revelation "neither apostolic nor prophetic" in the 1522 preface to his translation of the New Testament (he revised his position with a much more favorable assessment in 1530);Template:Sfn Swiss reformer Huldrych Zwingli labelled it "not a book of the Bible",Template:Sfn and it was the only New Testament book on which John Calvin did not write a commentary.Template:Sfn Template:As of Revelation remains the only New Testament book not read in the Divine Liturgy of the Eastern Orthodox Church,Template:Sfn although Roman Catholic and Protestant liturgies include it.

Texts and manuscripts

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote".

There are fewer manuscripts of the Book of Revelation than of any other text of the New Testament.Template:Sfn As of 2020, in total, there are 310 manuscripts of Revelation. This number includes 7 papyri, 12 majuscules, and 291 minuscules. But, in fact, not all of them are available for research. Some of them have been burned, vanished, or been categorized wrongly.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn While it is not extant in the Script error: No such module "Lang". (4th century), it is extant in the other great uncial codices: the Script error: No such module "Lang". (4th century), the Script error: No such module "Lang". (5th century), and the Script error: No such module "Lang". (5th century). In addition, there are numerous papyri, especially Template:Papyrus link and Template:Papyrus link (both 3rd century); minuscules (8th to 10th century); and fragmentary quotations in the Church fathers of the 2nd to 5th centuries and the 6th-century Greek commentary on Revelation by Andreas.Template:Sfn

Structure and content

Literary structure

Divisions in the book seem to be marked by the repetition of key phrases, by the arrangement of subject matter into blocks, and associated with its Christological passages,Template:Sfn such as invocations of seven. Nevertheless, there is a "complete lack of consensus" among scholars about the structure of Revelation.Template:Sfn The following is therefore an outline of the book's contents rather than of its structure.

Symbolism

Much use is made of significant numbers, especially the number seven, which represented perfection according to ancient numerology.Template:Sfn

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

A significant feature of apocalyptic writing is the use of symbolic colors, metals, garments, and numbers (four signifies the world, six imperfection, seven totality or perfection, twelve Israel’s tribes or the apostles, one thousand immensity). [...] One would find it difficult and repulsive to visualize a lamb with seven horns and seven eyes; yet Jesus Christ is described in precisely such words (Rev 5:6). The author used these images to suggest Christ’s universal (seven) power (horns) and knowledge (eyes).

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Outline

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Outline of the book of Revelation:

File:BambergApocalypseFolio003rAngelWith7Candlesticks.JPG
Illustration from the Bamberg Apocalypse of the Son of Man among the seven lampstands.
  1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ
    1. The Revelation of Jesus Christ is communicated to John through prophetic visions. (1:1–9)
    2. John is instructed by the "one like a son of man" to write all that he hears and sees, from the prophetic visions, to the Seven Churches of Asia. (1:10–13)
    3. The appearance of the "one like a son of man" is given, and he reveals what the seven stars and seven lampstands represent. (1:14–20)
  2. File:Seven churches of asia.svg
    The map of West Anatolia (formerly the province of Asia) showing the island of Patmos and the location of the seven churches mentioned in the Book of Revelation
    Messages for seven churches of Asia. These take the literary form of Persian ruler letters: purported royal decrees inscribed at major pagan temples to establish their ancient bona fides by demonstrating royal management: this still-contemporary form typically had sentences of proclamation, knowledge, praise, admonition, and judgment.[26]
    1. Ephesus: From this church, he "who overcomes is granted to eat from the tree of life, which is in the midst of the Paradise of God." (2:1–7)
      • Praised for not bearing those who are evil, testing those who say they are apostles and are not, and finding them to be liars; hating the deeds of the Nicolaitans; having persevered and possessing patience.
      • Admonished to "do the first works" and to repent for having left their "first love."
    2. Smyrna (modern İzmir): From this church, those who are faithful until death, will be given "the crown of life." He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death. (2:8–11)
      • Praised for being "rich" while impoverished and in tribulation.
      • Admonished not to fear the "synagogue of Satan", nor fear a ten-day tribulation of being thrown into prison.
    3. Pergamum: From this church, he who overcomes will be given the hidden manna to eat and a white stone with a secret name on it." (2:12–17)
      • Praised for holding "fast to My name", not denying "My faith" even in the days of Antipas, "My faithful martyr."
      • Admonished to repent for having held the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the children of Israel; eating things sacrificed to idols, committing sexual immorality, and holding the "doctrine of the Nicolaitans."
    4. File:Bamberg Apocalypse - To the Church in Pergamum and Thyatira.jpg
      To the Church in Pergamum and Thyatira.
      Thyatira: From this church, he who overcomes until the end, will be given power over the nations in order to dash them to pieces with a rod of iron; he will also be given the "morning star." (2:18–29)
      • Praised for their works, love, service, faith, and patience.
      • Admonished to repent for allowing a "prophetess" to promote sexual immorality and to eat things sacrificed to idols.
    5. Sardis: From this church, he who overcomes will be clothed in white garments, and his name will not be blotted out from the Book of Life; his name will also be confessed before the Father and his angels. (3:1–6)
      • Admonished to be watchful and to strengthen since their works have not been perfect before God.
    6. Philadelphia (modern Alaşehir): From this church, he who overcomes will be made a pillar in the temple of God having the name of God, the name of the city of God, "New Jerusalem", and the Son of God's new name. (3:7–13)
      • Praised for having some strength, keeping "My word", and having not denied "My name."
      • Reminded to hold fast what they have, that no one may take their crown.
    7. Laodicea: From this church, he who overcomes will be granted the opportunity to sit with the Son of God on his throne. (3:14–22)
      • Admonished to be zealous and repent from being "lukewarm"; they are instructed to buy the "gold refined in the fire", that they may be rich; to buy "white garments", that they may be clothed, so that the shame of their nakedness would not be revealed; to anoint their eyes with eye salve, that they may see.
  3. File:BambergApocalypseFolio013vLambAndBookWith7Seals - crop.jpg
    The Lamb with the Book with Seven Seals.
    Before the Throne of God
    1. The Throne of God appears, surrounded by twenty-four thrones with twenty-four elders seated in them. (4:1–5)
    2. The four living creatures are introduced. (4:6–11)
    3. A scroll, with seven seals, is presented and it is declared that the Lion of the tribe of Judah, from the "Root of David", is the only one worthy to open this scroll. (5:1–5)
    4. When the "Lamb having seven horns and seven eyes" took the scroll, the creatures of heaven fell down before the Lamb to give him praise, joined by myriads of angels and the creatures of the earth. (5:6–14)
  4. Seven Seals are opened
    1. File:White Rider from Tolkovy Apocalyps 17th century.jpg
      "And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer." White Rider from Tolkovy Apocalyps, Moscow, 17th century
      First Seal: A white horse appears, whose crowned rider has a bow with which to conquer. (6:1–2)
    2. Second Seal: A red horse appears, whose rider is granted a "great sword" to take peace from the earth. (6:3–4)
    3. Third Seal: A black horse appears, whose rider has "a pair of balances in his hand", where a voice then says, "A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine." (6:5–6)
    4. Fourth Seal: A pale horse appears, whose rider is Death, and Hades follows him. Death is granted a fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, with hunger, with death, and with the beasts of the earth. (6:7–8)
    5. Fifth Seal: "Under the altar", appeared the souls of martyrs for the "word of God", who cry out for vengeance. They are given white robes and told to rest until the martyrdom of their brothers is completed. (6:9–11)
    6. Sixth Seal: (6:12–17)
      1. There occurs a great earthquake where "the sun becomes black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon like blood" (6:12).
      2. The stars of heaven fall to the earth and the sky recedes like a scroll being rolled up (6:13–14).
      3. Every mountain and island is moved out of place (6:14).
      4. The people of earth retreat to caves in the mountains (6:15).
      5. The survivors call upon the mountains and the rocks to fall on them, so as to hide them from the "wrath of the Lamb" (6:16).
    7. Interlude: The 144,000 Hebrews are sealed.
      1. 144,000 from the Twelve Tribes of Israel are sealed as servants of God on their foreheads (7:1–8)
      2. A great multitude stand before the Throne of God, who come out of the Great Tribulation, clothed with robes made "white in the blood of the Lamb" and having palm branches in their hands. (7:9–17)
    8. Seventh Seal: Introduces the seven trumpets (8:1–5)
      1. "Silence in heaven for about half an hour" (8:1).
      2. Seven angels are each given trumpets (8:2).
      3. An eighth angel takes a "golden censer", filled with fire from the heavenly altar, and throws it to the earth (8:3–5). What follows are "peals of thunder, rumblings, flashes of lightning, and an earthquake" (8:5).
      4. After the eighth angel has devastated the earth, the seven angels introduced in verse 2 prepare to sound their trumpets (8:6).
  5. File:BambergApocalypseFolio019v7AngelsWith7TrumpetsAnd1WithCenser.JPG
    The Seven Trumpets and the angel with a censer.
    Seven trumpets are sounded (Seen in Chapters 8, 9, and 11).
    1. First Trumpet: Hail and fire, mingled with blood, are thrown to the earth burning up a third of the trees and green grass. (8:6–7)
    2. Second Trumpet: Something that resembles a great mountain, burning with fire, falls from the sky and lands in the ocean. It kills a third of the sea creatures and destroys a third of the ships at sea. (8:8–9)
    3. Third Trumpet: A great star, named Wormwood, falls from heaven and poisons a third of the rivers and springs of water. (8:10–11)
    4. Fourth Trumpet: A third of the sun, the moon, and the stars are darkened creating complete darkness for a third of the day and the night. (8:12–13)
    5. Fifth Trumpet: The First Woe (9:1–12)
      1. A "star" falls from the sky (9:1).
      2. This "star" is given "the key to the bottomless pit" (9:1).
      3. The "star" then opens the bottomless pit. When this happens, "smoke [rises] from [the Abyss] like smoke from a gigantic furnace. The sun and sky [are] darkened by the smoke from the Abyss" (9:2).
      4. File:B Escorial 94v.jpg
        The Fourth Angel sounds his trumpet, Apocalypse 8, Beatus Escorial, Template:Circa
        From out of the smoke, locusts who are "given power like that of scorpions of the earth" (9:3), who are commanded not to harm anyone or anything except for people who were not given the "seal of God" on their foreheads (from chapter 7) (9:4).
      5. The "locusts" are described as having a human appearance (faces and hair) but with lion's teeth, and wearing "breastplates of iron"; the sound of their wings resembles "the thundering of many horses and chariots rushing into battle" (9:7–9).
    6. Sixth Trumpet: The Second Woe (9:13–21)
      1. The four angels bound to the great river Euphrates are released to prepare two hundred million horsemen.
      2. These armies kill a third of mankind by plagues of fire, smoke, and brimstone.
    7. Interlude: The little scroll. (10:1–11)
      1. An angel appears, with one foot on the sea and one foot on the land, having an opened little book in his hand.
      2. Upon the cry of the angel, seven thunders utter mysteries and secrets that are not to be written down by John.
      3. John is instructed to eat the little scroll that happens to be sweet in his mouth, but bitter in his stomach, and to prophesy.
      4. John is given a measuring rod to measure the temple of God, the altar, and those who worship there.
      5. Outside the temple, at the court of the holy city, it is trod by the nations for forty-two months (<templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />3+12 years).
      6. Two witnesses prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth. (11:1–14)
    8. Seventh Trumpet: The Third Woe that leads into the seven bowls (11:15–19)
      1. The temple of God opens in heaven, where the ark of his covenant can be seen. There are lightnings, noises, thunderings, an earthquake, and great hail.
  6. The Seven Spiritual Figures. (Events leading into the Third Woe)
    1. File:BambergApocalypseFolio031vDragonPursuingWomanInWilderness.JPG
      The Woman and the Dragon.
      A Woman "clothed with a white robe, with the sun at her back, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars" is in pregnancy with a male child. (12:1–2)
    2. A great Dragon (with seven heads, ten horns, and seven crowns on his heads) drags a third of the stars of Heaven with his tail, and throws them to the Earth. (12:3–4). The Dragon waits for the birth of the child so he can devour it. However, sometime after the child is born, he is caught up to God's throne while the Woman flees into the wilderness into her place prepared of God that they should feed her there for 1,260 days (<templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />3+12 years). (12:5–6). War breaks out in heaven between Michael and the Dragon, identified as that old Serpent, the Devil, or Satan (12:9). After a great fight, the Dragon and his angels are cast out of Heaven for good, followed by praises of victory for God's kingdom. (12:7–12). The Dragon engages to persecute the Woman, but she is given aid to evade him. Her evasiveness enrages the Dragon, prompting him to wage war against the rest of her offspring, who keep the commandments of God and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. (12:13–17)
    3. File:B Escorial 108v.jpg
      A seven-headed leopard-like beast.
      A Beast (with seven heads, ten horns, and ten crowns on his horns and on his heads names of blasphemy) emerges from the Sea, having one mortally wounded head that is then healed. The people of the world wonder and follow the Beast. The Dragon grants him power and authority for forty-two months. (13:1–5)
    4. The Beast of the Sea blasphemes God's name (along with God's tabernacle and his kingdom and all who dwell in Heaven), wages war against the Saints, and overcomes them. (13:6–10)
    5. Then, a Beast emerges from the Earth having two horns like a lamb, speaking like a dragon. He directs people to make an image of the Beast of the Sea who was wounded yet lives, breathing life into it, and forcing all people to bear "the mark of the Beast". The number of the beast the Bible says is "666". Events leading into the Third Woe:
    6. The Lamb stands on Mount Zion with the 144,000 "first fruits" who are redeemed from Earth and victorious over the Beast and his mark and image. (14:1–5)
      1. The proclamations of three angels. (14:6–13)
      2. One like the Son of Man reaps the earth. (14:14–16)
      3. A second angel reaps "the vine of the Earth" and throws it into "the great winepress of the wrath of God... and blood came out of the winepress... up to one thousand six hundred stadia." (14:17–20)
      4. The temple of the tabernacle, in Heaven, is opened (15:1–5), beginning the "Seven Bowls" revelation.
      5. Seven angels are given a golden bowl, from the Four Living Creatures, that contains the seven last plagues bearing the wrath of God. (15:6–8)
  7. File:BambergApocalypseFolio038vAngelWith7Plagues.JPG
    Angels with the seven plagues.
    Seven bowls are poured onto Earth:
    1. First Bowl: A "foul and malignant sore" afflicts the followers of the Beast. (16:1–2)
    2. Second Bowl: The Sea turns to blood and everything within it dies. (16:3)
    3. Third Bowl: All fresh water turns to blood. (16:4–7)
    4. Fourth Bowl: The Sun scorches the Earth with intense heat and even burns some people with fire. (16:8–9)
    5. Fifth Bowl: There is total darkness and great pain in the Beast's kingdom. (16:10–11)
    6. Sixth Bowl: The Great River Euphrates is dried up and preparations are made for the kings of the East and the final battle at Armageddon between the forces of good and evil. (16:12–16)
    7. Seventh Bowl: A great earthquake and heavy hailstorm: "every island fled away and the mountains were not found." (16:17–21)
  8. Aftermath: Vision of John given by "an angel who had the seven bowls"
    1. The great Harlot who sits on a scarlet Beast (with seven heads and ten horns and names of blasphemy all over its body) and by many waters: Babylon the Great. The angel showing John the vision of the Harlot and the scarlet Beast reveals their identities and fates (17:1–18)
    2. New Babylon is destroyed. (18:1–8)
    3. The people of the Earth (the kings, merchants, sailors, etc.) mourn New Babylon's destruction. (18:9–19)
    4. The permanence of New Babylon's destruction. (18:20–24)
  9. The Marriage Supper of the Lamb
    1. A great multitude praises God. (19:1–6)
    2. The marriage Supper of the Lamb. (19:7–10)
  10. The Judgment of the two Beasts, the Dragon, and the Dead (19:11–20:15)
    1. The Beast and the False Prophet are cast into the Lake of Fire. (19:11–21)
    2. The Dragon is imprisoned in the Bottomless Pit for a thousand years. (20:1–3)
    3. The resurrected martyrs live and reign with Christ for a thousand years. (20:4–6)
    4. After the Thousand Years
      1. The Dragon is released and goes out to deceive the nations in the four corners of the Earth—Gog and Magog—and gathers them for battle at the holy city. The Dragon makes war against the people of God, but is defeated. (20:7–9)
      2. The Dragon is cast into the Lake of Fire with the Beast and the False Prophet. (20:10)
      3. The Last Judgment: the wicked, along with Death and Hades, are cast into the Lake of Fire, which is the second death. (20:11–15)
  11. File:BambergApocalypseFolio055rNew Jerusalem.JPG
    The angel showing John the New Jerusalem, with the Lamb of God at its center.
    The New Heaven and Earth, and New Jerusalem
    1. A "new heaven" and "new earth" replace the old heaven and old earth. There is no more suffering or death. (21:1–8)
    2. God comes to dwell with humanity in the New Jerusalem. (21:2–8)
    3. Description of the New Jerusalem. (21:9–27)
    4. The River of Life and the Tree of Life appear for the healing of the nations and peoples. The curse of sin is ended. (22:1–5)
  12. Conclusion
    1. Christ's reassurance that his coming is imminent. Final admonitions. (22:6–21)

Interpretations

Revelation has a wide variety of interpretations, ranging from the simple historical interpretation, to a prophetic view on what will happen in the future by way of God's will and the Woman's (traditionally believed to be the Virgin Mary) victory over Satan ("symbolic interpretation"), to different end time scenarios ("futurist interpretation"),Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn to the views of critics who deny any spiritual value to Revelation at all,Template:Efn ascribing it to a human-inherited archetype.

  • Liturgical interpretations concentrate on the vision of the divine liturgy which Christians participate in by their earthy liturgies.Template:Sfn
  • Historicist interpretations see Revelation as containing a broad view of history.
  • Preterist interpretations treat Revelation as mostly referring to the events of the Apostolic Age (1st century), or, at the latest, the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century.
  • Futurist interpretations see Revelation as describing future events with the seven churches growing into the body of believers throughout the age, and a reemergence or continuous rule of a Greco-Roman system with modern capabilities described by John in ways familiar to him.
  • Idealist or symbolic interpretations consider that Revelation does not refer to actual people or events but is an allegory of the spiritual path and the ongoing struggle between good and evil.

Early church fathers did not treat Revelation in any detail. The Western and Eastern theologians developed independent theological approaches: in the West, the Jerome reworked the c. 300 first Latin commentary of Victorinus of Pettau, downplaying millennialist/chilliast interpretations, while in the East Andreas of Caesarea reworked the c.600 first Greek commentary of Oikoumenios, with the calm judgement that the end-times had not then arrived.[27]Template:Rp

Liturgical

The visions of the book are "presented with a framework of liturgical activities, and toward the end of the book it is hardly possible to dissociate the acts of worship from the vision of the future," according to Protestant theologian Otto A. Piper.[28] John was taken up in "on the Lord's day", perhaps during the primitive liturgy, presumably based on Jewish synagogue models: Piper suggests that the visions disclose "the divine purpose and heavenly realities behind them."

Heavenly liturgy

This interpretation draws out that John is seeing the liturgy of heaven: Lutheran historian Paul Westermeyer comments "It is a “revelation” about God's goodness, mercy, and power over evil in a cosmic view, not a secret code for our calendars. Revelation sings a new song of proclamation, praise, and rejoicing by voices of multitudes gathered around a great supper of the Lamb, punctuated by other sounds."Template:Sfn

Revelation mentions various objects of John's vision of the angelic liturgy: an altar, robes, candles, incense, manna, chalices, the sign of the cross, references to the Lamb and to Mary, etc.[29]

Revelation sets an exemplar of the angelic liturgy which earthly liturgies should emulate, join and anticipate, in a view associated with Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite' Celestial Hierarchy. Otto A. Piper has suggested that Revelation discloses many Primitive Church theological and liturgical emphases or impulses, such as the church's participation in angelic worship, the worthiness of the interpreter of scripture, the liturgy as a spiritual battle, and the connection between Confession of Sins and the Eucharist, some being still current: "the description of the heavenly liturgy in Revelation was patterned after the actual liturgy of the Primitive Church." [28]

For Catholic theologian Joseph Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI):

<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />

With its vision of the cosmic liturgy, in the midst of which stands the Lamb who was sacrificed, the Apocalypse has presented the essential contents of the eucharistic sacrament in an impressive form that sets a standard for every local liturgy. From the point of view of the Apocalypse, the essential matter of all eucharistic liturgy is its participation in the heavenly liturgy; it is from thence that it necessarily derives its unity, its catholicity, and its universality.

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Paschal/eucharistic liturgy

This interpretation, which has found expression among both Catholic and Protestant theologians, considers the liturgical worship, particularly the Easter rites, of early Christianity as background and context for understanding the Book of Revelation's structure and significance. For Marilyn Parry, "there is a large loose structure which focuses on the eucharistic liturgies of the early church."Template:Sfn

This perspective is explained in The Paschal Liturgy and the Apocalypse (new edition, 2004) by Massey H. Shepherd, an Episcopal scholar, and in Scott Hahn's The Lamb's Supper: The Mass as Heaven on Earth (1999),[29] in which he states that Revelation in form is structured after creation, fall, judgment and redemption. Those who hold this view say that the Temple's destruction (AD 70) had a profound effect on the Jewish people, not only in Jerusalem but among the Greek-speaking Jews of the Mediterranean.[29]

They believe the Book of Revelation provides insight into the early Eucharist, saying that it is the new Temple worship in the New Heaven and Earth. The idea of the Eucharist as a foretaste of the heavenly banquet is also explored by British Methodist Geoffrey Wainwright in his book Eucharist and Eschatology (Oxford University Press, 1980).

This view builds from scholarly insights that identify various hymns or liturgical sequences in Revelation that are likely derived from, as well as informing, early church liturgy: Holy Holy Holy/Script error: No such module "Lang"./Script error: No such module "Lang". (Rev 4:8,11), "Amen. Come, Lord Jesus!” followed by “The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen" (Rev 20:20), "Worthy is the Lamb" (Rev 5:9-13), and many others.Template:SfnTemplate:Rp Some of the hymns may have had an anti-imperial theology.Template:Sfn

Oriental Orthodox

File:Mural from Apa Apollo in Bawit - Detail.jpg
"Christ in Glory (Pankrator)", c. 6th–8th century AD, wall painting from the Monastery of Bawit. The Coptic iconography represents many elements from the Book of Revelation.

In the Coptic Orthodox Church, Armenian Apostolic Church and Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church the whole Book of Revelation is read during Apocalypse Night after Good Friday.[30] Biblically Ugo Vanni and other biblical scholars have argued that the Book of Revelation was written with the intention to be read entirely in one liturgical setting with dialogue-elements between the reader (singular) and the hearers (plural) based on Rev 1:3 and Rev 1:10.[31] Beniamin Zakhary has recently shown that the structure of the reading the Book of Revelation within the Coptic rite of Apocalypse Night (this is the only biblical reading in the Coptic church with a dialogue in it, where the reader stops many times and the people respond; additionally the entire book is read in a liturgical setting that culminates with the Eucharist) shows great support for this biblical hypothesis, albeit with some notable difference.Template:Sfn

Additionally, the Book of Revelation permeates many liturgical prayers and iconography within the Coptic Church.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn

Eschatological

Most Christian interpretations fall into one or more of the following categories:

Additionally, there are significant differences in interpretation of the thousand years (the "millennium") mentioned in Revelation 20:2.

  • Premillennialism, which holds a literal interpretation of the "millennium" and generally prefers literal interpretations of the content of the book;
  • Amillennialism, which rejects a literal interpretation of the "millennium" and generally prefers allegorical interpretations of the content of the book; and
  • Postmillennialism, which includes both literal and allegorical interpretations of the "millennium" but views the Second Coming as following the conversion to Christianity of a gradually improving world.Template:Sfn

Catholic Script error: No such module "anchor".

According to the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops the Book of Revelation contains an account of visions in symbolic and allegorical language borrowed extensively from the Old Testament. Symbolic descriptions are not to be taken as literal descriptions, nor is the symbolism meant to be pictured realistically.[33]

According to Pope Benedict XVI some of the images of Revelation should be understood in the context of the dramatic suffering and persecution of the churches of Asia in the 1st century.[34] Accordingly, the Book of Revelation should not be read as an enigmatic warning, but as an encouraging vision of Christ's definitive victory over evil.[35] Pope Benedict XVI taught that Revelation "should be understood against the backdrop of" the early church's persecutions and inner problems, that "the Lamb who is slain yet standing" symbolizes Jesus' paschal mystery and Jesus being the meaning of life, that the vision of the woman and child symbolizes both Mary and the Church, that the New Jerusalem symbolizes the Church in its glory on Judgment Day, and that the prayers in Revelation reflect 1st century Jewish-Christian liturgy and Jewish-Christian understanding of the heavenly liturgy.[36][37][38][39]

According to Catholic Answers, the author of Revelation identifies the beast as the Roman Empire, the dragon as Satan, and Babylon as Rome. The meaning is that Rome "cannot win. It will be completely overthrown, and the Church is sure to triumph. This prophecy is as it were the hub of the Apocalypse. Around it John gradually unfolds the plan God has for the future of his Church."[40]

Eastern Orthodox

File:Apokalipsis XVI.jpg
An Orthodox icon of the Apocalypse of St. John, 16th century

Eastern Orthodoxy treats the text as simultaneously describing contemporaneous events (events occurring at the same time) and as prophecy of events to come, for which the contemporaneous events were a form of foreshadowing. It rejects attempts to determine, before the fact, if the events of Revelation are occurring by mapping them onto present-day events, taking to heart the Scriptural warning against those who proclaim "He is here!" prematurely. Instead, the book is seen as a warning to be spiritually and morally ready for the end times, whenever they may come ("as a thief in the night"), but they will come at the time of God's choosing, not something that can be precipitated nor trivially deduced by mortals.[41]

Book of Revelation is the only book of the New Testament that is not read during services by the Byzantine Rite Churches,[42] although it is read in the Western Rite Orthodox Parishes, which are under the same bishops as the Byzantine Rite.

Protestant

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Template:Empty section

Seventh-day Adventist

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Similar to the early Protestants, Adventists maintain a historicist interpretation of the Bible's predictions of the apocalypse.[43]

Seventh-day Adventists believe the Book of Revelation is especially relevant to believers in the days preceding the second coming of Jesus Christ. "The universal church is composed of all who truly believe in Christ, but in the last days, a time of widespread apostasy, a remnant has been called out to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus."[44] "Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus."[45] As participatory agents in the work of salvation for all humankind, "This remnant announces the arrival of the judgment hour, proclaims salvation through Christ, and heralds the approach of His second advent."[46] The three angels of Revelation 14 represent the people who accept the light of God's messages and go forth as his agents to sound the warning throughout the length and breadth of the earth.Template:Sfn

Bahá'í Faith

By reasoning analogous with Millerite historicism, Bahá'u'lláh's doctrine of progressive revelation, a modified historicist method of interpreting prophecy, is identified in the teachings of the Bahá'í Faith.[47]

ʻAbdu'l-Bahá, the son and chosen successor of Bahá'u'lláh, has given some interpretations about the 11th and 12th chapters of Revelation in Some Answered Questions.[48][49] The 1,260 days spoken of in the forms: one thousand two hundred and sixty days,[50] forty-two months,[51] refers to the 1,260 years in the Islamic Calendar (AH 1260 or AD 1844). The "two witnesses" spoken of are Muhammad and Ali.[52] The red Dragon spoken of in Revelation 12:3 – "And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads"[53] – are interpreted as symbolic of the seven provinces dominated by the Umayyads: Damascus, Persia, Arabia, Egypt, Africa, Andalusia, and Transoxania. The ten horns represent the ten names of the leaders of the Umayyad dynasty: Abu Sufyan, Muawiya, Yazid, Marwan, Abd al-Malik, Walid, Sulayman, Umar, Hisham, and Ibrahim. Some names were re-used, as in the case of Yazid II and Yazid III and the like, which were not counted for this interpretation.[54]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

The Book of Mormon states that John the Apostle is the author of Revelation and that he was foreordained by God to write it.[55]

Doctrine and Covenants, section 77, postulates answers to specific questions regarding the symbolism contained in the Book of Revelation. Topics include: the sea of glass, the four beasts and their appearance, the 24 elders, the book with seven seals, certain angels, the sealing of the 144,000, the little book eaten by John, and the two witnesses in Chapter 11.[56]

Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe that the warning contained in Revelation 22:18–19 does not refer to the biblical canon as a whole. Rather, an open and ongoing dialogue between God and the modern-day Prophet and Apostles of the LDS faith constitute an open canon of scripture.[57]

Esoteric

Christian Gnostics are unlikely to be attracted to the teaching of Revelation because the doctrine of salvation through the sacrificed Lamb, which is central to Revelation, is repugnant to Gnostics. Christian Gnostics "believed in the Forgiveness of Sins, but in no vicarious sacrifice for sin ... they accepted Christ in the full realisation of the word; his life, not his death, was the keynote of their doctrine and their practice."Template:Sfn

James Morgan Pryse was an esoteric gnostic who saw Revelation as a western version of the Hindu theory of the Chakra. He began his work, "The purpose of this book is to show that the Apocalypse is a manual of spiritual development and not, as conventionally interpreted, a cryptic history or prophecy."Template:SfnTemplate:EfnTemplate:Efn Such diverse theories have failed to command widespread acceptance. However, Christopher Rowland argues: "there are always going to be loose threads which refuse to be woven into the fabric as a whole. The presence of the threads which stubbornly refuse to be incorporated into the neat tapestry of our world-view does not usually totally undermine that view."Template:Sfn

Radical discipleship

The radical discipleship interpretation asserts that the Book of Revelation is best understood as a handbook for radical discipleship; i.e. how to remain faithful to the spirit and teachings of Jesus and avoid simply assimilating to surrounding society. In this interpretation the primary agenda of the book is to expose as impostors the worldly powers that seek to oppose the ways of God and God's Kingdom.Script error: No such module "Unsubst". The chief temptation for Christians in the 1st century, and today,Template:Opinion is to fail to hold fast to the non-violent teachings and example of Jesus and instead be lured into unquestioning adoption and assimilation of worldly, national or cultural values – imperialism, nationalism, and civil religion being the most dangerous and insidious.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

This perspective (closely related to liberation theology) draws on the approach of Bible scholars such as Ched Myers, William Stringfellow, Richard Horsley, Daniel Berrigan, Wes Howard-Brook,Template:Sfn and Joerg Rieger.Template:Sfn Various Christian anarchists, such as Jacques Ellul, have identified the state and political power as the BeastTemplate:Sfn and the events described, being their doings and results, the aforementioned 'wrath'.

Aesthetic and literary

File:Augsburger Wunderzeichenbuch — Folio 185 crop.jpg
This artwork from Script error: No such module "Lang". illustrates Revelation 11:5–8: "And if anyone would harm them, fire pours from their mouth and consumes their foes. If anyone would harm them, this is how he is doomed to be killed ... And when they have finished their testimony, the beast that rises from the bottomless pit will make war on them and conquer them and kill them, and their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city." (Template:C.)

Literary writers and theorists have contributed to a wide range of theories about the origins and purpose of the Book of Revelation.

Victorian poet Christina Rossetti's The Face of the Deep is a meditation upon the Apocalypse in the form of a verse-by-verse commentary.[58] In her view, what Revelation has to teach is patience.Template:Efn Patience is the closest to perfection the human condition allows.[59] Her book, which is largely written in prose, frequently breaks into poetry or jubilation, much like Revelation itself. The relevance of John's visionsTemplate:Efn belongs to Christians of all times as a continuous present meditation. Such matters are eternal and outside of normal human reckoning. "That winter which will be the death of Time has no promise of termination. Winter that returns not to spring ... – who can bear it?"Template:Sfn She dealt deftly with the vengeful aspects of John's message. "A few are charged to do judgment; everyone without exception is charged to show mercy."Template:Sfn Her conclusion is that Christians should see John as "representative of all his brethren" so they should "hope as he hoped, love as he loved".Template:Sfn

Charles Cutler Torrey taught Semitic languages at Yale University. He championed the view that prophets, such as the scribe of Revelation, are much more meaningful when treated as poets first and foremost. He thought this was a point often lost sight of because most English bibles render everything in prose.Template:Sfn Torrey insisted Revelation had originally been written in Aramaic.Template:Sfn However, Old Testament scholar Christopher R. North said of Torrey's earlier Isaiah theory, "Few scholars of any standing have accepted his theory."Template:Sfn Torrey proposed that the three major songs in Revelation (the new song, the song of Moses and the Lamb and the chorus at 19:6–8) each fall naturally into four regular metrical lines plus a coda.Template:Sfn Other dramatic moments in Revelation, such as 6:16 where the terrified people cry out to be hidden, behave in a similar way.Template:Sfn

D. H. Lawrence took an opposing (to, e.g., Rossetti), pessimistic view of Revelation in the final book he wrote, Apocalypse.Template:Sfn He saw the language which Revelation used as being bleak and destructive; a 'death-product'. His specific aesthetic objections to Revelation were that its imagery was unnatural and that phrases like "the wrath of the Lamb" were "ridiculous". He saw Revelation as comprising two discordant halves. In the first, there was a scheme of cosmic renewal in "great Chaldean sky-spaces", which he quite liked. After that, Lawrence thought, the book became preoccupied with the birth of the baby messiah and "flamboyant hate and simple lust ... for the end of the world".[60]

Recently,Template:Clarify timeframe aesthetic and literary modes of interpretation have developed, which focus on Revelation as a work of art and imagination, viewing the imagery as symbolic depictions of timeless truths and the victory of good over evil. Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza wrote Revelation: Vision of a Just World from the viewpoint of rhetoric.[61] Accordingly, Revelation's meaning is partially determined by the way John goes about saying things, partially by the context in which readers receive the message and partially by its appeal to something beyond logic.Template:Sfn

Professor Schüssler Fiorenza believes that Revelation has particular relevance today as a liberating message to disadvantaged groups. John's book is a vision of a just world, not a vengeful threat of world-destruction. Her view that Revelation's message is not gender-based has caused dissent. She says humanity is to look behind the symbols rather than make a fetish out of them. In contrast, Tina Pippin states that John writes "horror literature" and "the misogyny which underlies the narrative is extreme."Template:Sfn

In recent years, theories have arisen which concentrate upon how readers and texts interact to create meaning and which are less interested in what the original author intended.Template:Sfn

Academic

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". Modern biblical scholarship attempts to understand Revelation in its 1st-century historical context within the genre of Jewish and Christian apocalyptic literature.[1][62] This approach considers the text as an address to seven historical communities in Asia Minor. Under this interpretation, assertions that "the time is near" are to be taken literally by those communities. Consequently, the work is viewed as a warning not to conform to contemporary Greco-Roman society which John "unveils" as beastly, demonic, and subject to divine judgment.[62]

New Testament narrative criticism also places Revelation in its first century historical context but approaches the book from a literary perspective.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn For example, narrative critics examine characters and characterization, literary devices, settings, plot, themes, point of view, implied reader, implied author, and other constitutive features of narratives in their analysis of the book.

Although the acceptance of Revelation into the canon has, from the beginning, been controversial, it has been essentially similar to the career of other texts.[63] The eventual exclusion of other contemporary apocalyptic literature from the canon may throw light on the unfolding historical processes of what was officially considered orthodox, what was heterodox, and what was even heretical.[63] Interpretation of meanings and imagery are anchored in what the historical author intended and what his contemporary audience inferred; a message to Christians not to assimilate into the Roman imperial culture was John's central message.[62] Thus, the letter (written in the apocalyptic genre) is pastoral in nature (its purpose is offering hope to the downtrodden),[3] and the symbolism of Revelation is to be understood entirely within its historical, literary, and social context.[3] Critics study the conventions of apocalyptic literature and events of the 1st century to make sense of what the author may have intended.[3]

Old Testament origins

Much of Revelation employs ancient sources, primarily but not exclusively from the Old Testament. For example, Howard-Brook and GwytherTemplate:Sfn regard the Book of Enoch as an equally significant but contextually different source. "Enoch's journey has no close parallel in the Hebrew scriptures."

English-language academics showed little interest in this topic until recently.Template:Efn A Scottish commentary from 1871[64] prefaces Revelation 4 with the Little Apocalypse of Mark 13, places Malachi 4:5 ("Behold I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord") within Revelation 11 and writes Revelation 12:7 side by side with the role of "the Satan" in the Book of Job. The message is that everything in Revelation will happen in its previously appointed time.Template:Sfn

New Testament scholar Steve Moyise used the index of the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament to show that "Revelation contains more Old Testament allusions than any other New Testament book, but it does not record a single quotation." Perhaps significantly, Revelation chooses different sources than other New Testament books. Revelation concentrates on Isaiah, Psalms, and Ezekiel, while neglecting, comparatively speaking, the books of the Pentateuch that are the dominant sources for other New Testament writers. Template:Sfn

Yet, with Revelation, the problems might be judged more fundamental. The author seems to be using his sources in a completely different way to the originals. For example, the author borrows the 'new temple' imagery of Ezekiel 40–48 but uses it to describe a New Jerusalem which, quite pointedly, no longer needs a temple because it is God's dwelling. New Testament scholar Ian Boxall writes that Revelation "is no montage of biblical quotations (that is not John's way) but a wealth of allusions and evocations rewoven into something new and creative." In trying to identify this "something new", Boxall argues that Ezekiel provides the 'backbone' for Revelation. He sets out a comparative table listing the chapters of Revelation in sequence and linking most of them to the structurally corresponding chapter in Ezekiel. The interesting point is that the order is not the same. John, on this theory, rearranges Ezekiel to suit his own purposes.Template:Sfn

Some commentators argue that it is these purposes – and not the structure – that really matter. New Testament scholar G. K. Beale believes that, however much John makes use of Ezekiel, his ultimate purpose is to present Revelation as a fulfillment of Daniel 7.[65] New Testament scholar Richard Bauckham has argued that John presents an early view of the Trinity through his descriptions of the visions and his identifying Jesus and the Holy Spirit with YHWH.Template:Sfn New Testament scholar Brandon Smith has expanded on both of their proposals while proposing a "trinitarian reading" of Revelation, arguing that John uses Old Testament language and allusions from various sources to describe a multiplicity of persons in YHWH without sacrificing monotheism, which would later be codified in the trinitarian doctrine of Nicene Christianity.Template:SfnScript error: No such module "Unsubst".

Olivet discourse

According to James Stuart Russell, the book is an exposition of Olivet Discourse found in the Synoptic Gospels in Matthew 24 and 25, Mark 13, and Luke 21. Russell suggests there are parallels between the prophecy told by Jesus to the disciples and the prophecy recorded in the Book of Revelation, such as wars, famines, pestilence, earthquakes, false prophets, the darkening of the sun and moon, and stars falling from heaven.[66]

Liturgical usage

The Revised Common Lectionary draws its readings for the Sundays of the Easter season in Year C from the Book of Revelation.[67]

Figures in Revelation

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In order of appearance: Template:Div col

  1. The author (see John the Apostle or John of Patmos)
  2. One like the Son of Man who gives the revelation
  3. Antipas of Pergamum, the faithful martyr
  4. Nicolaitans
  5. Jezebel
  6. The One who sits on the throne (God)
  7. The four living creatures
  8. The Twenty-Four Elders
  9. The Lamb, with seven horns and seven eyes (Lion of Judah)
  10. Saints under the altar
  11. Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
  12. The souls of them that were slain for the word of God
  13. Four angels holding the four winds of the Earth
  14. The seal-bearer angel (144,000 of Israel sealed)
  15. A great multitude from every nation
  16. Seven angelic trumpeters
  17. The star called Wormwood
  18. Angel of Woe
  19. Scorpion-tailed Locusts
  20. The angel of the bottomless pit (Hebrew: Abaddon, Greek: Apollyon)
  21. Four angels bound to the great river Euphrates
  22. Two hundred million man cavalry
  23. The mighty angel with little book open and when he cried of seven thunders uttered their voices
  24. The Two Witnesses
  25. The Woman and her child
  26. The Dragon, fiery red with seven heads and ten horns (Satan)
  27. Michael the Archangel
  28. The Beast, with seven heads and ten horns (Antichrist/Beast of the Sea)
  29. The False Prophet (Beast of the Earth)
  30. The three angels
  31. The angelic reapers and the grapes of wrath
  32. Voice from heaven
  33. Seven plague angels (Seven bowls of wrath)
  34. Angel of the waters
  35. The Whore of Babylon (Mother of harlots)
  36. Word of God/Rider on a white horse
  37. Angel binding Satan for one thousand years
  38. Those of the first resurrection
  39. Gog and Magog (after the one thousand years)
  40. Those of the second resurrection

Template:Div col end

See also

Script error: No such module "Portal".

Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

Notes

Template:Notelist

References

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Bass, Ralph E. Jr. (2004). Back to the Future: A Study in the Book of Revelation, Greenville, South Carolina: Living Hope Press, Template:ISBN.
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Beale G.K. (1999). The Book of Revelation, NIGTC, Grand Rapids: Cambridge. Template:ISBN
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Bousset W., Die Offenbarung Johannis, Göttingen 18965, 19066.
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Boxall, Ian (2002). Revelation: Vision and Insight – An Introduction to the Apocalypse, London: SPCK Template:ISBN
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1"..
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Ford, J. Massyngberde (1975). Revelation, The Anchor Bible, New York: Doubleday Template:ISBN.
  • Gentry, Kenneth L. Jr. (1998). Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation, Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, Template:ISBN.
  • Gentry, Kenneth L. Jr. (2002). The Beast of Revelation, Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, Template:ISBN.
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Hahn, Scott (1999). The Lamb's Supper: Mass as Heaven on Earth, Darton, Longman, Todd, Template:ISBN
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Hernández, Juan (2006). Scribal habits and theological influences in the Apocalypse, Tübingen
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Kiddle M. (1941). The Revelation of St. John (The Moffat New Testament Commentary), New York – London
  • Kirsch, Thomas (2006). A History of the End of the World: How the Most Controversial Book in the Bible Changed the Course of Western Civilization. New York: HarperOne
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". The book was published posthumously with an introduction (pp. v–xli) by Richard Aldington which is an integral part of the text.
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Lohmeyer, Ernst (1953). Die Offenbarung des Johannes, Tübingen
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Muggleton, Lodowicke (2010). Works on the Book of Revelation London Template:ISBN
  • Müller, U.B. (1995). Die Offenbarung des Johannes, Güttersloh
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Pagels, Elaine (2012). Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation, Viking Adult, Template:ISBN
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". [Major discussion of the controversy surrounding the acceptance/rejection of Revelation into the New Testament canon.]
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Template:Cite CE1913
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

External links

Template:Prone to spam Template:Sister project Template:Sister project Template:Wikisource/outer coreScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Book of Revelation
Apocalyptic Epistle
Preceded byTemplate:S-bef/check New Testament
Books of the Bible
Template:S-ttl/check
End

Template:S-end Template:Book of Revelation Template:Books of the Bible Template:Global catastrophic risks Template:Authority control

  1. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b c d Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".Template:Cbignore
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  9. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  20. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  21. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  28. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  29. a b c Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  32. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  36. Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 23 August 2006
  37. Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 5 September 2012
  38. Vatican.Va, Benedict XVI General Audience 12 September 2012
  39. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  40. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  41. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  42. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "Of these books, only Revelation is not read at some point in the liturgical services of the Byzantine Rite".
  43. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  44. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  45. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  46. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  48. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  49. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  50. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  51. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  52. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  53. Script error: No such module "Bibleverse".
  54. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  55. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  56. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  57. Template:Cite speech
  58. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  59. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".: "Christians should resemble fire-flies, not glow-worms; their brightness drawing eyes upward, not downward."
  60. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  61. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". The book seems to have started life as Invitation to the Book of Revelation (Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1981).
  62. a b c Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1". Lecture 24 (transcript) Template:Webarchive
  63. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  64. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  65. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  67. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".