Requesting a reference for this footnote. While the difference in the number of strokes is easy to see, the existence of a significant difference in confusability, and its relevance, seems less clear to me.
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 31:
Line 31:
{{block indent|1={{rn|'''I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII'''}}}}
{{block indent|1={{rn|'''I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII'''}}}}
The notations {{rn|IV}} and {{rn|IX}} can be read as "one less than five" (4) and "one less than ten" (9), although there is a tradition favouring the representation of "4" as "{{rn|IIII}}" on Roman numeral clocks.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Judkins |first=Maura |date=4 November 2011 |title=Public clocks do a number on Roman numerals |newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/public-clocks-do-a-number-on-roman-numerals/2011/11/04/gIQAenKllM_blog.html |url-status=dead |access-date=13 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115002205/https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/public-clocks-do-a-number-on-roman-numerals/2011/11/04/gIQAenKllM_blog.html |archive-date=15 November 2020 |quote=Most clocks using Roman numerals traditionally use IIII instead of IV... One of the rare prominent clocks that uses the IV instead of IIII is Big Ben in London.}}</ref>
The notations {{rn|IV}} and {{rn|IX}} can be read as "one less than five" (4) and "one less than ten" (9), although there is a tradition favouring the representation of "4" as "{{rn|IIII}}" on Roman numeral clocks.
<ref>{{Cite news
|last=Judkins
|first=Maura
|date=4 November 2011
|title=Public clocks do a number on Roman numerals
|newspaper=The Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/public-clocks-do-a-number-on-roman-numerals/2011/11/04/gIQAenKllM_blog.html
|url-status=dead
|access-date=13 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115002205/https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/arts-post/post/public-clocks-do-a-number-on-roman-numerals/2011/11/04/gIQAenKllM_blog.html
|archive-date=15 November 2020
|quote=Most clocks using Roman numerals traditionally use IIII instead of IV... One of the rare prominent clocks that uses the IV instead of IIII is Big Ben in London.}}</ref>
Other common uses include year numbers on monuments and buildings and copyright dates on the title screens of films and television programmes. {{rn|MCM}}, signifying "a thousand, and a hundred less than another thousand", means 1900, so 1912 is written {{rn|MCMXII}}. For the years of the current (21st) century, {{rn|MM}} indicates 2000; this year is {{rn|{{#time:xrY}}}} ({{CURRENTYEAR}}).
Other common uses include year numbers on monuments and buildings and copyright dates on the title screens of films and television programmes. {{rn|MCM}}, signifying "a thousand, and a hundred less than another thousand", means 1900, so 1912 is written {{rn|MCMXII}}. For the years of the current ({{ordinal|{{CURRENTCENTURY}}}}) century, {{rn|MM}} indicates 2000; this year is {{rn|{{#time:xrY}}}} ({{CURRENTYEAR}}).
==Description==
==Description==
Line 67:
Line 77:
|}
|}
{{anchor|Subtractive notation<!--[[Sign-value notation]] links to this anchor; please update that article if this anchor is changed or deleted.-->}} The numerals for 4 ({{rn|IV}}) and 9 ({{rn|IX}}) are written using [[subtractive notation]],<ref name="deha1997">{{Cite book |last=Dehaene |first=Stanislas |title=The Number Sense : How the Mind Creates Mathematics |date=1997 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199723096}} 288 pages.</ref> where the smaller symbol ({{rn|I}}) is ''subtracted'' from the larger one ({{rn|V}}, or {{rn|X}}), thus avoiding the clumsier {{rn|IIII}} and {{rn|VIIII}}.{{efn|Without theorising about causation, it may be noted that {{rn|IV}} and {{rn|IX}} not only have fewer characters than {{rn|IIII}} and {{rn|VIIII}}, but are less likely to be confused (especially at a quick glance) with {{rn|III}} and {{rn|VIII}}.}} Subtractive notation is also used for 40 ({{rn|XL}}), 90 ({{rn|XC}}), 400 ({{rn|CD}}) and 900 ({{rn|CM}}).<ref name="ema1990">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Numbers, Representations of |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of Mathematics |publisher=Springer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kwMdtnhtUMMC&dq=%22Roman+numerals%22+additive&pg=PA502 |date=1990 |editor-last=Hazewinkel |editor-first=Michiel |volume=6 |page=502 |isbn=9781556080050}} 546 pages.</ref> These are the only subtractive forms in standard use.
{{anchor|Subtractive notation<!--[[Sign-value notation]] links to this anchor; please update that article if this anchor is changed or deleted.-->}} The numerals for 4 ({{rn|IV}}) and 9 ({{rn|IX}}) are written using [[subtractive notation]],<ref name="deha1997">{{Cite book |last=Dehaene |first=Stanislas |title=The Number Sense : How the Mind Creates Mathematics |date=1997 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=9780199723096}} 288 pages.</ref> where the smaller symbol ({{rn|I}}) is ''subtracted'' from the larger one ({{rn|V}} or {{rn|X}}), instead of {{rn|IIII}} and {{rn|VIIII}}.{{efn|{{rn|IV}} and {{rn|IX}} not only have fewer characters than {{rn|IIII}} and {{rn|VIIII}}, but are less likely to be confused (especially at a quick glance) with {{rn|III}} and {{rn|VIII}}.{{Citation needed|date=November 2025}}}} Subtractive notation is also used for 40 ({{rn|XL}}), 90 ({{rn|XC}}), 400 ({{rn|CD}}) and 900 ({{rn|CM}}).<ref name="ema1990">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Numbers, Representations of |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia of Mathematics |publisher=Springer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kwMdtnhtUMMC&dq=%22Roman+numerals%22+additive&pg=PA502 |date=1990 |editor-last=Hazewinkel |editor-first=Michiel |volume=6 |page=502 |isbn=9781556080050}} 546 pages.</ref> These are the only subtractive forms in standard use.
A number containing two or more decimal digits is built by appending the Roman numeral equivalent for each, from highest to lowest, as in the following examples:
A number containing two or more decimal digits is built by appending the Roman numeral equivalent for each, from highest to lowest, as in the following examples:
* 1,066 = {{rn|M}} + {{rn|LX}} + {{rn|VI}} = '''{{rn|MLXVI}}'''<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Dela Cruz |first1=M. L. P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PVK6lt2xXz4C |title=Number Smart Quest for Mastery: Teacher's Edition |last2=Torres |first2=H. D. |date=2009 |publisher=Rex Bookstore, Inc. |isbn=9789712352164}}</ref><ref name="martelli">{{Cite book |last1=Martelli |first1=Alex |url=https://archive.org/details/pythoncookbook00mart |title=Python Cookbook |last2=Ascher |first2=David |date=2002 |publisher=O'Reilly Media Inc. |isbn=978-0-596-00167-4 |url-access=registration}}</ref>
* 1,066 = {{rn|M}} + {{rn|LX}} + {{rn|VI}} = '''{{rn|MLXVI}}'''<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Dela Cruz |first1=M. L. P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PVK6lt2xXz4C |title=Number Smart Quest for Mastery: Teacher's Edition |last2=Torres |first2=H. D. |date=2009 |publisher=Rex Bookstore, Inc. |isbn=9789712352164}}</ref><ref name="martelli">{{Cite book |last1=Martelli |first1=Alex |url=https://archive.org/details/pythoncookbook00mart |title=Python Cookbook |last2=Ascher |first2=David |date=2002 |publisher=O'Reilly Media Inc. |isbn=978-0-596-00167-4 |url-access=registration}}</ref>
Line 87:
Line 97:
* {{#time:Y}} = '''{{rn|{{#time:xrY}}}}''' (this year){{efn|This is the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) year in which Wikipedia's cache of this page was last updated, so may be a few hours out of date.}}
* {{#time:Y}} = '''{{rn|{{#time:xrY}}}}''' (this year){{efn|This is the Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) year in which Wikipedia's cache of this page was last updated, so may be a few hours out of date.}}
Prior to the introduction of Arabic numerals in the West, ancient and medieval users of Roman numerals used various means to write larger numbers {{xref|(see {{slink||Large numbers}} below)}}.
For larger numbers (4,000 and larger): Both before and after the introduction of Arabic numerals in the West, from ancient times through medieval and modern, users of Roman numerals have used various means to write larger numbers {{xref|(see {{slink||Large numbers}} below)}}.
===Other forms===
===Other forms <span class="anchor" id="Alternative forms"></span>===
Forms exist that vary in one way or another from the general standard represented above.
Forms exist that vary in one way or another from the general standard represented above.
Line 113:
Line 123:
There are historical examples of other subtractive forms: {{rn|IIIXX}} for 17,<ref name="lvnd1621">{{Cite book |last=Lundorphio |first=Michaele Gaspar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C41mAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA123 |title=Acta publica inter invictissimos gloriosissimosque&c. ... et Ferdinandum II. Romanorum Imperatores... |date=1621 |publisher=Ian-Friderici Weissii |page=123 |language=la}} <br />Page 123: "{{lang|la|Sub Dato Pragæ IIIXX Decemb. A. C. M. DC. IIXX}}". <br />Page 126, end of the same document: "{{lang|la|Dabantur Pragæ 17 Decemb. M. DC. IIXX}}".</ref> {{rn|IIXX}} for 18,<ref name="sulp1692">{{Cite book |last=Sulpicius à Munscrod |first=Raphael |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_N43WFqB1wtoC/page/n69 |title=Vera Ac Germana Detecto Clandestinarvm Deliberationvm |date=1621 |page=16 |language=la}} <br />Page 16, line 1: "{{lang|la|repertum Originale Subdatum IIIXXX Aug. A. C. MDC.IIXX}}". <br />Page 41, upper right corner: "{{lang|la|Decemb. A. C. MDC.IIXX}}". Page 42, upper left corner: "{{lang|la|Febr. A. C. MDC.XIX}}". Page 70: "{{lang|la|IIXX. die Maij sequentia in consilio noua ex Bohemia allata....}}". <br />Page 71: "{{lang|la|XIX. Maij}}.</ref> {{rn|IIIC}} for 97,<ref name="tent1699">{{Cite book |last=Tentzel |first=Wilhelm Ernst |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VN9lAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA39 |title=Als Ihre Königl. Majestät in Pohlen und ... |date=1699 |page=39 |language=de}} <br />Page 39: "{{lang|de|... und der Umschrifft: LITHUANIA ASSERTA M. DC. IIIC [1699].}}"</ref> {{rn|IIC}} for 98,<ref name="posn1698">{{Cite book |last=Posner |first=Johann Caspar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bmtOAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP9 |title=Mvndvs ante mvndvm sive De Chao Orbis Primordio |date=1698 |language=la}} <br />Title page: "{{lang|la|Ad diem jvlii A. O. R. M DC IIC}}".</ref><ref name="tent1700">{{Cite book |last=Tentzel |first=Wilhelm Ernst |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qFVPAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA93 |title=Saxonia Nvmismatica: Das ist: Die Historie Des Durchlauchtigsten... |date=1700 |page=26 |language=de}} <br />Page 26: "{{lang|de|Die Revers hat eine feine Inscription}}: {{lang|la|SERENISSIMO DN.DN... SENATUS.QVERNF. A. M DC IIC D. 18 OCT [year 1698 day 18 oct].}}"</ref> and {{rn|IC}} for 99.<ref name="picc1699">{{Cite book |last=Piccolomini |first=Enea Silvio |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0RNXAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA1 |title=Opera Geographica et Historica |date=1698 |publisher=J. M. Sustermann |edition=1st |location=Helmstadt |language=la |author-link=Pope Pius II}} Title page of first edition: "{{lang|la|Bibliopolæ ibid. M DC IC}}".</ref> A possible explanation is that the word for 18 in Latin is {{lang|la|duodeviginti}}{{px2}}{{mdash}}{{tsp}}literally "two from twenty"{{mdash}}{{tsp}}while 98 is {{lang|la|duodecentum}} (two from hundred) and 99 is {{lang|la|undecentum}} (one from hundred).<ref name="kenn1879">{{Cite book |last=Kennedy |first=Benjamin H. |url=https://archive.org/details/publiclatin00kennrich |title=Latin grammar |date=1879 |publisher=Longmans, Green, and Co. |isbn=9781177808293 |location=London |page=[https://archive.org/details/publiclatin00kennrich/page/150 150]}}</ref> However, the explanation does not seem to apply to {{rn|IIIXX}} and {{rn|IIIC}}, since the Latin words for 17 and 97 were {{lang|la|septendecim}} (seven ten) and {{lang|la|nonaginta septem}} (ninety seven), respectively.
There are historical examples of other subtractive forms: {{rn|IIIXX}} for 17,<ref name="lvnd1621">{{Cite book |last=Lundorphio |first=Michaele Gaspar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=C41mAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA123 |title=Acta publica inter invictissimos gloriosissimosque&c. ... et Ferdinandum II. Romanorum Imperatores... |date=1621 |publisher=Ian-Friderici Weissii |page=123 |language=la}} <br />Page 123: "{{lang|la|Sub Dato Pragæ IIIXX Decemb. A. C. M. DC. IIXX}}". <br />Page 126, end of the same document: "{{lang|la|Dabantur Pragæ 17 Decemb. M. DC. IIXX}}".</ref> {{rn|IIXX}} for 18,<ref name="sulp1692">{{Cite book |last=Sulpicius à Munscrod |first=Raphael |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_N43WFqB1wtoC/page/n69 |title=Vera Ac Germana Detecto Clandestinarvm Deliberationvm |date=1621 |page=16 |language=la}} <br />Page 16, line 1: "{{lang|la|repertum Originale Subdatum IIIXXX Aug. A. C. MDC.IIXX}}". <br />Page 41, upper right corner: "{{lang|la|Decemb. A. C. MDC.IIXX}}". Page 42, upper left corner: "{{lang|la|Febr. A. C. MDC.XIX}}". Page 70: "{{lang|la|IIXX. die Maij sequentia in consilio noua ex Bohemia allata....}}". <br />Page 71: "{{lang|la|XIX. Maij}}.</ref> {{rn|IIIC}} for 97,<ref name="tent1699">{{Cite book |last=Tentzel |first=Wilhelm Ernst |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VN9lAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA39 |title=Als Ihre Königl. Majestät in Pohlen und ... |date=1699 |page=39 |language=de}} <br />Page 39: "{{lang|de|... und der Umschrifft: LITHUANIA ASSERTA M. DC. IIIC [1699].}}"</ref> {{rn|IIC}} for 98,<ref name="posn1698">{{Cite book |last=Posner |first=Johann Caspar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bmtOAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP9 |title=Mvndvs ante mvndvm sive De Chao Orbis Primordio |date=1698 |language=la}} <br />Title page: "{{lang|la|Ad diem jvlii A. O. R. M DC IIC}}".</ref><ref name="tent1700">{{Cite book |last=Tentzel |first=Wilhelm Ernst |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qFVPAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA93 |title=Saxonia Nvmismatica: Das ist: Die Historie Des Durchlauchtigsten... |date=1700 |page=26 |language=de}} <br />Page 26: "{{lang|de|Die Revers hat eine feine Inscription}}: {{lang|la|SERENISSIMO DN.DN... SENATUS.QVERNF. A. M DC IIC D. 18 OCT [year 1698 day 18 oct].}}"</ref> and {{rn|IC}} for 99.<ref name="picc1699">{{Cite book |last=Piccolomini |first=Enea Silvio |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0RNXAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA1 |title=Opera Geographica et Historica |date=1698 |publisher=J. M. Sustermann |edition=1st |location=Helmstadt |language=la |author-link=Pope Pius II}} Title page of first edition: "{{lang|la|Bibliopolæ ibid. M DC IC}}".</ref> A possible explanation is that the word for 18 in Latin is {{lang|la|duodeviginti}}{{px2}}{{mdash}}{{tsp}}literally "two from twenty"{{mdash}}{{tsp}}while 98 is {{lang|la|duodecentum}} (two from hundred) and 99 is {{lang|la|undecentum}} (one from hundred).<ref name="kenn1879">{{Cite book |last=Kennedy |first=Benjamin H. |url=https://archive.org/details/publiclatin00kennrich |title=Latin grammar |date=1879 |publisher=Longmans, Green, and Co. |isbn=9781177808293 |location=London |page=[https://archive.org/details/publiclatin00kennrich/page/150 150]}}</ref> However, the explanation does not seem to apply to {{rn|IIIXX}} and {{rn|IIIC}}, since the Latin words for 17 and 97 were {{lang|la|septendecim}} (seven ten) and {{lang|la|nonaginta septem}} (ninety seven), respectively.
The {{code|ROMAN()}} function in [[Microsoft Excel]] supports multiple subtraction modes depending on the "{{tt|Form}}" setting. For example, the number "499" (usually {{rn|CDXCIX}}) can be rendered as {{rn|LDVLIV}}, {{rn|XDIX}}, {{rn|VDIV}} or {{rn|ID}}. The relevant Microsoft help page offers no explanation for this function other than to describe its output as "more concise".<ref>{{Cite web |title=ROMAN function |url=https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/roman-function-d6b0b99e-de46-4704-a518-b45a0f8b56f5 |website=Microsoft Support}}</ref>
The {{code|ROMAN()}} function in [[Microsoft Excel]] supports multiple subtraction modes depending on the "{{tt|Form}}" setting. For example, the number "499" (usually {{rn|CDXCIX}}) can be rendered as {{rn|LDVLIV}} ((500-50)+(50-5)+(5-1)), {{rn|XDIX}} ((500-10)+(10-1)), {{rn|VDIV}} ((500-5)+(5-1)) or {{rn|ID}} (500-1). The relevant Microsoft help page offers no explanation for this function other than to describe its output as "more concise".<ref>{{Cite web |title=ROMAN function |url=https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/roman-function-d6b0b99e-de46-4704-a518-b45a0f8b56f5 |website=Microsoft Support}}</ref>
====Non-standard variants====
====Non-standard variants====
Line 139:
Line 149:
[[File:Semisse.jpg|thumb|right|upright=0.9|A {{lang|la|[[semis]]}} coin ({{frac|1|2}} or {{frac|6|12}} of an {{lang|la|as}}). Note the {{rn|S}} indicating its value.]]
[[File:Semisse.jpg|thumb|right|upright=0.9|A {{lang|la|[[semis]]}} coin ({{frac|1|2}} or {{frac|6|12}} of an {{lang|la|as}}). Note the {{rn|S}} indicating its value.]]
The base "Roman fraction" is {{rn|S}}, indicating {{frac|1|2}}. The use of {{rn|S}} (as in {{rn|VIIS}} to indicate 7{{frac|1|2}}) is attested in some ancient inscriptions<ref>{{Cite web |title=RIB 2208. Distance Slab of the Sixth Legion |url=https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2196 |access-date=11 November 2020 |website=Roman Inscriptions in Britain}}</ref> and in the now rare apothecaries' system (usually in the form {{rn|SS}}):<ref name="Bachenheimer" /> but while Roman numerals for [[Integers|whole numbers]] are essentially [[decimal]], {{rn|S}} does not correspond to {{frac|5|10}}, as one might expect, but {{frac|6|12}}.
The base "Roman fraction" is {{rn|S}}, indicating {{frac|1|2}}. The use of {{rn|S}} (as in {{rn|VIIS}} to indicate {{frac|7|1|2}}) is attested in some ancient inscriptions<ref>{{Cite web |title=RIB 2208. Distance Slab of the Sixth Legion |url=https://romaninscriptionsofbritain.org/inscriptions/2196 |access-date=11 November 2020 |website=Roman Inscriptions in Britain}}</ref> and in the now rare apothecaries' system (usually in the form {{rn|SS}}):<ref name="Bachenheimer" /> but while Roman numerals for [[Integers|whole numbers]] are essentially [[decimal]], {{rn|S}} does not correspond to {{frac|5|10}}, as one might expect, but {{frac|6|12}}.
The Romans used a [[duodecimal]] rather than a decimal system for [[rational number|fractions]], as the [[divisibility]] of twelve {{nowrap|1= (12 = 2<sup>2</sup> × 3)}} makes it easier to handle the common [[Fraction (mathematics)|fractions]] of {{frac|1|3}} and {{frac|1|4}} than does a system based on ten {{nowrap|1= (10 = 2 × 5)}}. Notation for fractions other than {{frac|1|2}} is mainly found on surviving [[Roman coin]]s, many of which had values that were duodecimal fractions of the unit {{lang|la|[[As (coin)|as]]}}. Fractions less than {{frac|1|2}} are indicated by a dot ('''·''') for each {{lang|la|uncia}} "twelfth", the source of the English words ''inch'' and ''ounce''; dots are repeated for fractions up to five twelfths. Six twelfths (one half), is {{rn|S}} for {{lang|la|semis}} "half". ''Uncia'' dots were added to {{rn|S}} for fractions from seven to eleven twelfths, just as tallies were added to {{rn|V}} for whole numbers from six to nine.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Maher |first1=David W. |last2=Makowski |first2=John F. |date=2011 |title=Literary Evidence for Roman Arithmetic with Fractions |url=http://dmaher.org/Publications/romanarithmetic.pdf |journal=Classical Philology |volume=96 |issue=4 |pages=376–399 |doi=10.1086/449557 |s2cid=15162149 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827220707/http://dmaher.org/Publications/romanarithmetic.pdf |archive-date=27 August 2013}}</ref> The arrangement of the dots was variable and not necessarily [[Linearity|linear]]. Five dots arranged like ('''⁙''') (as on the face of a [[dice|die]]) are known as a [[quincunx]], from the name of the Roman fraction/coin. The Latin words {{lang|la|sextans}} and {{lang|la|quadrans}} are the source of the English words ''[[sextant]]'' and ''[[Quadrant (plane geometry)|quadrant]]''.
The Romans used a [[duodecimal]] rather than a decimal system for [[rational number|fractions]], as the [[divisibility]] of twelve {{nowrap|1= (12 = 2<sup>2</sup> × 3)}} makes it easier to handle the common [[Fraction (mathematics)|fractions]] of {{frac|1|3}} and {{frac|1|4}} than does a system based on ten {{nowrap|1= (10 = 2 × 5)}}. Notation for fractions other than {{frac|1|2}} is mainly found on surviving [[Roman coin]]s, many of which had values that were duodecimal fractions of the unit {{lang|la|[[As (coin)|as]]}}. Fractions less than {{frac|1|2}} are indicated by a dot ('''·''') for each {{lang|la|uncia}} "twelfth", the source of the English words ''inch'' and ''ounce''; dots are repeated for fractions up to five twelfths. Six twelfths (one half), is {{rn|S}} for {{lang|la|semis}} "half". ''Uncia'' dots were added to {{rn|S}} for fractions from seven to eleven twelfths, just as tallies were added to {{rn|V}} for whole numbers from six to nine.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Maher |first1=David W. |last2=Makowski |first2=John F. |date=2011 |title=Literary Evidence for Roman Arithmetic with Fractions |url=http://dmaher.org/Publications/romanarithmetic.pdf |journal=Classical Philology |volume=96 |issue=4 |pages=376–399 |doi=10.1086/449557 |s2cid=15162149 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130827220707/http://dmaher.org/Publications/romanarithmetic.pdf |archive-date=27 August 2013}}</ref> The arrangement of the dots was variable and not necessarily [[Linearity|linear]]. Five dots arranged like ('''⁙''') (as on the face of a [[dice|die]]) are known as a [[quincunx]], from the name of the Roman fraction/coin. The Latin words {{lang|la|sextans}} and {{lang|la|quadrans}} are the source of the English words ''[[sextant]]'' and ''[[Quadrant (plane geometry)|quadrant]]''.
Line 275:
Line 285:
[[File:Roman numerals Bungus 1584-1585.png|thumb|upright=0.9|Page from a 16th-century manual, showing a mixture of {{lang|la|apostrophus}} and {{lang|la|vinculum}} numbers (see in particular the ways of writing 10,000).]]
[[File:Roman numerals Bungus 1584-1585.png|thumb|upright=0.9|Page from a 16th-century manual, showing a mixture of {{lang|la|apostrophus}} and {{lang|la|vinculum}} numbers (see in particular the ways of writing 10,000).]]
Sometimes {{rn|CIↃ}} (1000) is reduced to {{rn|ↀ}}, {{rn|IↃↃ}} (5,000) to {{rn|ↁ}}; {{rn|CCIↃↃ}} (10,000) to {{rn|ↂ}}; {{rn|IↃↃↃ}} (50,000) to {{rn|ↇ}}; and {{rn|CCCIↃↃↃ}} (100,000) to {{rn|ↈ}}.<ref name="Ifrah2000">{{Cite book |last=Ifrah |first=Georges |title=The Universal History of Numbers: From Prehistory to the Invention of the Computer |date=2000 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |others=Translated by David Bellos, E. F. Harding, Sophie Wood, Ian Monk}}</ref> It is likely {{rn|IↃ}} (500) reduced to {{rn|D}} and {{rn|CIↃ}} (1000) influenced the later {{rn|M}}.
Sometimes {{rn|IↃ}} (500) is reduced to {{rn|D}}, {{rn|CIↃ}} (1,000) to {{rn|ↀ}}, {{rn|IↃↃ}} (5,000) to {{rn|ↁ}}; {{rn|CCIↃↃ}} (10,000) to {{rn|ↂ}}; {{rn|IↃↃↃ}} (50,000) to {{rn|ↇ}}; and {{rn|CCCIↃↃↃ}} (100,000) to {{rn|ↈ}}.<ref name="Ifrah2000">{{Cite book |last=Ifrah |first=Georges |title=The Universal History of Numbers: From Prehistory to the Invention of the Computer |date=2000 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |others=Translated by David Bellos, E. F. Harding, Sophie Wood, Ian Monk}}</ref> It is likely {{rn|CIↃ}} (1000) influenced the later {{rn|M}}.
[[John Wallis]] is often credited with introducing the symbol for [[infinity]] {{angbr|∞}}, and one conjecture is that he based it on {{rn|ↀ}}, since 1,000 was [[hyperbole|hyperbolically]] used to represent very large numbers.
[[John Wallis]] is often credited with introducing [[infinity symbol|the {{angbr|∞}} symbol]] for [[infinity]], and one conjecture is his basing it on {{rn|ↀ}}, since 1,000 was [[hyperbole|hyperbolically]] used to represent very large numbers.
====Vinculum====
====Vinculum====
Line 287:
Line 300:
* '''{{rn|IV|border=t}}''' = 4,000
* '''{{rn|IV|border=t}}''' = 4,000
* '''{{rn|XXV|border=t}}''' = 25,000
* '''{{rn|XXV|border=t}}''' = 25,000
The ''vinculum ''came into use in the [[Roman Republic|late Republic]],<ref name=Dilke>{{Cite book |last=Dilke |first=Oswald Ashton Wentworth |title=Mathematics and measurement |date=1987 |publisher=British Museum Publications |isbn=978-0-7141-8067-0 |series=Reading the past |location=London|page=15}}</ref> and it was a common alternative to the apostrophic ↀ during the Imperial era around the Roman world (M for '1000' was not in use until the Medieval period).<ref name="Chrisomalis01">{{Cite book |last=Chrisomalis |first=Stephen |title=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |title-link=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |date=2010 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-87818-0 |pages=102–109}}</ref><ref name="gordon01">{{Cite book |last=Gordon |first=Arthur E. |title=Illustrated Introduction to Latin Epigraphy |date=1982 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=0-520-05079-7 |location=Berkeley |pages=122–123}}</ref> It continued in use in the Middle Ages, though it became known more commonly as {{lang|la|titulus}},<ref name="Chrisomalis02">{{Cite book |last=Chrisomalis |first=Stephen |title=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |title-link=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |date=2010 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-87818-0 |pages=119}}</ref> and it appears in modern editions of classical and medieval Latin texts.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Boethius |url=https://archive.org/download/aniciimanliitor00friegoog/aniciimanliitor00friegoog.pdf |title=De Institutione Arithmetica, libri duo |date=1867 |publisher=B.G.Teubner |pages=42 |author-link=Boethius |access-date=18 January 2023 |orig-date=6th century AD}}</ref><ref name="PlinyNH" />
The ''vinculum ''came into use in the [[Roman Republic|late Republic]],<ref name=Dilke>{{Cite book |last=Dilke |first=Oswald Ashton Wentworth |title=Mathematics and measurement |date=1987 |publisher=British Museum Publications |isbn=978-0-7141-8067-0 |series=Reading the past |location=London|page=15}}</ref> and it was a common alternative to the apostrophic ↀ during the Imperial era around the Roman world (M for '1000' was not in use until the Medieval period).<ref name="Chrisomalis01">{{Cite book |last=Chrisomalis |first=Stephen |title=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |title-link=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |date=2010 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-87818-0 |pages=102–109}}</ref><ref name="gordon01">{{Cite book |last=Gordon |first=Arthur E. |title=Illustrated Introduction to Latin Epigraphy |date=1982 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=0-520-05079-7 |location=Berkeley |pages=122–123}}</ref> It continued in use in the Middle Ages, though it became known more commonly as {{lang|la|titulus}},<ref name="Chrisomalis02">{{Cite book |last=Chrisomalis |first=Stephen |title=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |title-link=Numerical Notation: A Comparative History |date=2010 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-87818-0 |pages=119}}</ref> and it appears in modern editions of classical and medieval Latin texts.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Boethius |url=https://archive.org/download/aniciimanliitor00friegoog/aniciimanliitor00friegoog.pdf |title=De Institutione Arithmetica, libri duo |date=1867 |publisher=B.G.Teubner |pages=42 |author-link=Boethius |access-date=18 January 2023 |orig-date=6th century AD}}</ref><ref name="PlinyNH" />
Line 307:
Line 321:
===Etruscan numerals===
===Etruscan numerals===
{{Main|Etruscan numerals}}
{{Main|Etruscan numerals}}
Rome was founded sometime between 850 and 750 BC. At the time, the region was inhabited by diverse populations of which the Etruscans were the most advanced. The ancient Romans themselves admitted that the basis of much of their civilization was Etruscan. Rome itself was located next to the southern edge of the Etruscan domain, which covered a large part of north-central Italy.
Rome was founded sometime between 850 and 750 BC, next to the southern edge of the Etruscan domain, which covered a large part of north-central Italy.
The Roman numerals, in particular, are directly derived from the [[Etruscan numerals|Etruscan number symbols]]: {{angbr|𐌠}}, {{angbr|𐌡}}, {{angbr|𐌢}}, {{angbr|𐌣}}, and {{angbr|𐌟}} for 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 (they had more symbols for larger numbers, but it is unknown which symbol represents which number). As in the basic Roman system, the Etruscans wrote the symbols that added to the desired number, from higher to lower value. Thus, the number 87, for example, would be written 50 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 5 + 1 + 1 = 𐌣𐌢𐌢𐌢𐌡𐌠𐌠 (this would appear as 𐌠𐌠𐌡𐌢𐌢𐌢𐌣 since [[Etruscan language|Etruscan]] was written from right to left.)<ref name="heem2009">{{Cite journal |last=Van Heems |first=Gilles |date=2009 |title=Nombre, chiffre, lettre: Formes et réformes. Des notations chiffrées de l'étrusque |trans-title=Between Numbers and Letters: About Etruscan Notations of Numeral Sequences |url=https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-philologie-litterature-et-histoire-anciennes-2009-1-page-103.htm |journal=Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes |language=fr |volume=83 |issue=1 |pages=103–130 |issn=0035-1652}}</ref>
The Roman numerals, in particular, are directly derived from the [[Etruscan numerals|Etruscan number symbols]]: {{angbr|𐌠}}, {{angbr|𐌡}}, {{angbr|𐌢}}, {{angbr|𐌣}}, and {{angbr|𐌟}} for 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 (they had more symbols for larger numbers, but it is unknown which symbol represents which number). As in the basic Roman system, the Etruscans wrote the symbols that added to the desired number, from higher to lower value. Thus, the number 87, for example, would be written 50 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 5 + 1 + 1 = 𐌣𐌢𐌢𐌢𐌡𐌠𐌠 (this would appear as 𐌠𐌠𐌡𐌢𐌢𐌢𐌣 since [[Etruscan language|Etruscan]] was written from right to left.)<ref name="heem2009">{{Cite journal |last=Van Heems |first=Gilles |date=2009 |title=Nombre, chiffre, lettre: Formes et réformes. Des notations chiffrées de l'étrusque |trans-title=Between Numbers and Letters: About Etruscan Notations of Numeral Sequences |url=https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-philologie-litterature-et-histoire-anciennes-2009-1-page-103.htm |journal=Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes |language=fr |volume=83 |issue=1 |pages=103–130 |issn=0035-1652}}</ref>
Line 433:
Line 447:
[[File:Carlos IV Coin.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|Spanish [[Spanish real|Real]] using {{rn|IIII}} instead of {{rn|IV}} as regnal number of [[Charles IV of Spain|Charles {{Rn|IV}} of Spain]].|alt=]]
[[File:Carlos IV Coin.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|Spanish [[Spanish real|Real]] using {{rn|IIII}} instead of {{rn|IV}} as regnal number of [[Charles IV of Spain|Charles {{Rn|IV}} of Spain]].|alt=]]
* Names of monarchs and popes, e.g. [[Elizabeth II]] of the United Kingdom, [[Pope Leo XIV]]. These are referred to as [[regnal number]]s and are usually read as [[Ordinal numbers (linguistics)|ordinals]]; e.g. {{rn|II}} is pronounced "the second". This tradition began in Europe sporadically in the [[Middle Ages]], gaining widespread use in England during the reign of [[Henry VIII]]. Previously, the monarch was not known by numeral but by an [[epithet]] such as [[Edward the Confessor]]. Some monarchs (e.g. [[Charles IV of Spain]], [[Louis XIV of France]] and [[William IV of the United Kingdom|William IV of Great Britain]]) seem to have preferred the use of {{rn|IIII}} instead of {{rn|IV}} on their coinage (see illustration).
* Names of monarchs and popes, e.g. [[Elizabeth II]] of the United Kingdom, [[Pope Leo XIV]]. These are referred to as [[regnal number]]s and are usually read as [[Ordinal numbers (linguistics)|ordinals]]; e.g. {{rn|II}} is pronounced "the second". This tradition began in Europe sporadically in the [[Middle Ages]], gaining widespread use in England during the reign of [[Henry VIII]]. Previously, the monarch was not known by numeral but by an [[epithet]] such as [[Edward the Confessor]]. Some monarchs (e.g. [[Charles IV of Spain]], [[Louis XIV]] of France and [[William IV]] of Great Britain) seem to have preferred the use of {{rn|IIII}} instead of {{rn|IV}} on their coinage (see illustration).
* [[Suffix (name)#Generational titles|Generational suffixes]], particularly in the U.S., for people sharing the same name across generations, such as [[William Howard Taft IV]]. These are also usually read as ordinals.
* [[Suffix (name)#Generational titles|Generational suffixes]], particularly in the U.S., for people sharing the same name across generations, such as [[William Howard Taft IV]]. These are also usually read as ordinals.
* In the [[French Republican Calendar#Converting from the Gregorian Calendar|French Republican Calendar]], initiated during the [[French Revolution]], years were numbered by Roman numerals – from the year {{rn|I}} (1792) when this calendar was introduced to the year {{rn|XIV}} (1805) when it was abandoned.
* In the [[French Republican Calendar#Converting from the Gregorian Calendar|French Republican Calendar]], initiated during the [[French Revolution]], years were numbered by Roman numerals – from the year {{rn|I}} (1792) when this calendar was introduced to the year {{rn|XIV}} (1805) when it was abandoned.
Line 496:
Line 510:
Capital or [[Small caps|small capital]] Roman numerals are widely used in [[Romance languages]] to denote {{strong|centuries}}, e.g. the French ''{{lang|fr|{{Smallcaps|xviii}}<sup>e</sup> siècle}}''<ref>{{Cite book |title=Lexique des règles typographiques en usage à l'imprimerie nationale |date=March 2011 |publisher=[[Imprimerie nationale]] |isbn=978-2-7433-0482-9 |edition=6th |location=Paris |pages=126 |language=fr}} ''On composera en chiffres romains petites capitales les nombres concernant : ↲ 1. Les siècles.''</ref> and the Spanish ''{{lang|es|siglo {{Smallcaps|xviii}}}}'' (not ''{{lang|es|{{Smallcaps|xviii}} siglo}}'') for "18th century". Some Slavic and Turkic languages (especially in and adjacent to Russia) similarly favour Roman numerals (e.g. Russian {{lang|ru|XVIII век}}, Azeri {{lang|az|XVIII əsr}} or Polish {{lang|pl|wiek XVIII}}<ref>{{Cite web |title=cyfry arabskie a zapis wieku |url=https://poradnia-jezykowa.uni.lodz.pl/faq/cyfry-arabskie-a-zapis-wieku/ |first=Katarzyna |last=Burska |website=Poradnia językowa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |publisher=University of Łódź |language=pl |trans-title=Arabic digits when formatting centuries}}</ref>). On the other hand, in [[Turkish language|Turkish]] and some [[Central Europe|Central European]] Slavic languages, like most [[Germanic languages]], one writes "18." (with a period) before the local word for "century" (e.g. Turkish {{lang|tr|18. yüzyıl}}, Czech {{lang|cs|18. století}}).
Capital or [[Small caps|small capital]] Roman numerals are widely used in [[Romance languages]] to denote {{strong|centuries}}, e.g. the French ''{{lang|fr|{{Smallcaps|xviii}}<sup>e</sup> siècle}}''<ref>{{Cite book |title=Lexique des règles typographiques en usage à l'imprimerie nationale |date=March 2011 |publisher=[[Imprimerie nationale]] |isbn=978-2-7433-0482-9 |edition=6th |location=Paris |pages=126 |language=fr}} ''On composera en chiffres romains petites capitales les nombres concernant : ↲ 1. Les siècles.''</ref> and the Spanish ''{{lang|es|siglo {{Smallcaps|xviii}}}}'' (not ''{{lang|es|{{Smallcaps|xviii}} siglo}}'') for "18th century". Some Slavic and Turkic languages (especially in and adjacent to Russia) similarly favour Roman numerals (e.g. Russian {{lang|ru|XVIII век}}, Azeri {{lang|az|XVIII əsr}} or Polish {{lang|pl|wiek XVIII}}<ref>{{Cite web |title=cyfry arabskie a zapis wieku |url=https://poradnia-jezykowa.uni.lodz.pl/faq/cyfry-arabskie-a-zapis-wieku/ |first=Katarzyna |last=Burska |website=Poradnia językowa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |publisher=University of Łódź |language=pl |trans-title=Arabic digits when formatting centuries}}</ref>). On the other hand, in [[Turkish language|Turkish]] and some [[Central Europe|Central European]] Slavic languages, like most [[Germanic languages]], one writes "18." (with a period) before the local word for "century" (e.g. Turkish {{lang|tr|18. yüzyıl}}, Czech {{lang|cs|18. století}}).
When typing on Russian typewriters, the Roman-numeral "V" was replaced with "У" because the letter "V" was absent in the Russian Cyrillic alphabet. Additionally, the Roman-numeral "I" was replaced with "1", since this letter had been removed from the Russian alphabet by the [[Reforms of Russian orthography|1918 reform of orthography]]. For example, XVIII was typed as ХУ111. This style is sometimes maintained even when typing on a computer, either out of habit or due to the inconvenience of switching between Latin and Russian script for one or two letters.
[[File:Yeltsin-authograph-1988.gif|thumb|upright=1.1|[[Boris Yeltsin]]'s signature, dated 10 November 1988, rendered as 10.{{rn|XI}}.'88.]]
[[File:Yeltsin-authograph-1988.gif|thumb|upright=1.1|[[Boris Yeltsin]]'s signature, dated 10 November 1988, rendered as 10.{{rn|XI}}.'88.]]
Line 505:
Line 521:
Roman numerals are sometimes used to represent the {{strong|days of the week}} in hours-of-operation signs displayed in windows or on doors of businesses,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Beginners latin |url=http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/latin/beginners/dating/default.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203092331/http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/latin/beginners/dating/default.htm |archive-date=3 December 2013 |access-date=1 December 2013 |website=nationalarchives.gov.uk}}</ref> and sometimes in railway and bus timetables. Monday, taken as the first day of the week, is represented by {{rn|I}}. Sunday is represented by {{rn|VII}}. The hours of operation signs are tables composed of two columns where the left column is the day of the week in Roman numerals and the right column is a range of hours of operation from starting time to closing time. In the example case (left), the business opens from 10 AM to 7 PM on weekdays, 10 AM to 5 PM on Saturdays and is [[Sunday shopping|closed on Sundays]]. Note that the listing uses 24-hour time.
Roman numerals are sometimes used to represent the {{strong|days of the week}} in hours-of-operation signs displayed in windows or on doors of businesses,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Beginners latin |url=http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/latin/beginners/dating/default.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203092331/http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/latin/beginners/dating/default.htm |archive-date=3 December 2013 |access-date=1 December 2013 |website=nationalarchives.gov.uk}}</ref> and sometimes in railway and bus timetables. Monday, taken as the first day of the week, is represented by {{rn|I}}. Sunday is represented by {{rn|VII}}. The hours of operation signs are tables composed of two columns where the left column is the day of the week in Roman numerals and the right column is a range of hours of operation from starting time to closing time. In the example case (left), the business opens from 10 AM to 7 PM on weekdays, 10 AM to 5 PM on Saturdays and is [[Sunday shopping|closed on Sundays]]. Note that the listing uses 24-hour time.
[[File:S6002447 cropped.jpg|thumb|Sign at 17.9 km on route SS4 [[Via Salaria|Salaria]], north of Rome, Italy.]]
[[File:Roma - strada statale 4 - segnale di progressiva ettometrica 17+900.jpg|thumb|Sign at 17.9 km on route SS4 [[Via Salaria|Salaria]], north of Rome, Italy.]]
Roman numerals may also be used for [[floor numbering]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Roman Arithmetic |url=http://turner.faculty.swau.edu/mathematics/materialslibrary/roman/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131122162120/http://turner.faculty.swau.edu/mathematics/materialslibrary/roman/ |archive-date=22 November 2013 |access-date=1 December 2013 |publisher=[[Southwestern Adventist University]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Roman Numerals History |url=http://romannumerals.info/roman-numerals-history/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203091427/http://romannumerals.info/roman-numerals-history/ |archive-date=3 December 2013 |url-status=usurped |access-date=1 December 2013}}</ref> For instance, apartments in central [[Amsterdam]] are indicated as 138-{{rn|III}}, with both an Arabic numeral (number of the block or house) and a Roman numeral (floor number). The apartment on the ground floor is indicated as {{lang|nl|138-huis}}.
Roman numerals may also be used for [[floor numbering]].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Roman Arithmetic |url=http://turner.faculty.swau.edu/mathematics/materialslibrary/roman/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131122162120/http://turner.faculty.swau.edu/mathematics/materialslibrary/roman/ |archive-date=22 November 2013 |access-date=1 December 2013 |publisher=[[Southwestern Adventist University]]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Roman Numerals History |url=http://romannumerals.info/roman-numerals-history/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203091427/http://romannumerals.info/roman-numerals-history/ |archive-date=3 December 2013 |url-status=usurped |access-date=1 December 2013}}</ref> For instance, apartments in central [[Amsterdam]] are indicated as 138-{{rn|III}}, with both an Arabic numeral (number of the block or house) and a Roman numeral (floor number). The apartment on the ground floor is indicated as {{lang|nl|138-huis}}.
Line 516:
Line 532:
==Unicode==
==Unicode==
The "[[Number Forms]]" block of the [[Unicode]] computer character set standard has a number of [[Numerals in Unicode#Roman numerals|Roman numeral symbols]] in the range of [[Unicode code point|code points]] from U+2160 to U+2188.<ref name="UnicodeChartU2150">{{Cite web |url=https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2150.pdf |title=Unicode Number Forms}}</ref> This range includes both upper- and lowercase numerals, as well as pre-combined characters for numbers up to 12 (Ⅻ or {{rn|XII}}). One justification for the existence of pre-combined numbers is to facilitate the setting of multiple-letter numbers (such as VIII) on a single horizontal line in Asian vertical text. The Unicode standard, however, includes special Roman numeral code points for compatibility only, stating that "[f]or most purposes, it is preferable to compose the Roman numerals from sequences of the appropriate Latin letters".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=The Unicode Standard, Version 6.0 – Electronic edition |url=https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.0.0/ch15.pdf |publisher=Unicode, Inc. |pages=486}}</ref> The block also includes some {{lang|la|apostrophus}} symbols for large numbers, an old variant of "{{rn|L}}" (50) similar to the Etruscan character, the [[Claudian letter]] "reversed C", etc.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Roman symbol |url=https://symbolonly.com/roman-symbols.html |website=symbolonly.com}}</ref>
The "[[Number Forms]]" block of the [[Unicode]] computer character set standard has a number of [[Numerals in Unicode#Roman numerals|Roman numeral symbols]] in the range of [[Unicode code point|code points]] from U+2160 to U+2188.<ref name="UnicodeChartU2150">{{Cite web |url=https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U2150.pdf |title=Unicode Number Forms}}</ref> This range includes both upper- and lowercase numerals, as well as pre-combined characters for numbers up to 12. One justification for the existence of pre-combined numbers is to facilitate the setting of multiple-letter numbers (such as VIII) on a single horizontal line in Asian vertical text. The Unicode standard, however, includes special Roman numeral code points for compatibility only, stating that "[f]or most purposes, it is preferable to compose the Roman numerals from sequences of the appropriate Latin letters".<ref>{{Cite web |date=2011 |title=The Unicode Standard, Version 6.0 – Electronic edition |url=https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode6.0.0/ch15.pdf |publisher=Unicode, Inc. |pages=486}}</ref> The block also includes some {{lang|la|[[#Apostrophus|apostrophus]]}} symbols for large numbers, an old variant of "{{rn|L}}" (50) similar to the Etruscan character, the [[Claudian letter]] "reversed C", etc.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Roman symbol |url=https://symbolonly.com/roman-symbols.html |website=symbolonly.com}}</ref>
==See also==
==See also==
Line 554:
Line 570:
==External links==
==External links==
* {{Cite web |title=Roman Numerals (Totally Epic Guide) |url=https://www.knowtheromans.co.uk/Categories/SubCatagories/RomanNumerals/ |website=Know The Romans}}
* {{Cite web |title=Roman Numerals (Totally Epic Guide) |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510123317/https://www.knowtheromans.co.uk/Categories/SubCatagories/RomanNumerals/ |website=Know the Romans}}
Roman numerals are a numeral system that originated in ancient Rome and remained the usual way of writing numbers throughout Europe well into the Late Middle Ages. Numbers are written with combinations of letters from the Latin alphabet, each with a fixed integer value. The modern style uses only these seven:
The use of Roman numerals continued long after the decline of the Roman Empire. From the 14th century on, Roman numerals began to be replaced by Arabic numerals; however, this process was gradual, and the use of Roman numerals persisted in various places, including on clock faces. For instance, on the clock of Big Ben (designed in 1852), the hours from 1 to 12 are written as:
The notations Template:Rn and Template:Rn can be read as "one less than five" (4) and "one less than ten" (9), although there is a tradition favouring the representation of "4" as "Template:Rn" on Roman numeral clocks.
[1]
Other common uses include year numbers on monuments and buildings and copyright dates on the title screens of films and television programmes. Template:Rn, signifying "a thousand, and a hundred less than another thousand", means 1900, so 1912 is written Template:Rn. For the years of the current (Template:Ordinal) century, Template:Rn indicates 2000; this year is Template:Rn (2025).
File:CuttySarkRomNum.jpgRoman numerals on stern of the ship Script error: No such module "WPSHIPS utilities".Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters". showing draught in feet. The numbers range from 13 to 22, from bottom to top.
Roman numerals use different symbols for each power of ten, and there is no zero symbol, in contrast with the place value notation of Arabic numerals (in which place-keeping zeros enable the same digit to represent different powers of ten).
This allows some flexibility in notation, and there has never been an official or universally accepted standard for Roman numerals. Usage varied greatly in ancient Rome and became thoroughly chaotic in medieval times. The more recent restoration of a largely "classical" notation has gained popularity among some, while variant forms are used by some modern writers as seeking more "flexibility".[2] Roman numerals may be considered legally binding expressions of a number, as in U.S. copyright law before the Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 (where an "incorrect" or ambiguous numeral in a copyright notice could invalidate a copyright claim or affect the termination date of the copyright period).[3]
Standard form
The following table displays how Roman numerals are usually written in modern times:[4]
A number containing two or more decimal digits is built by appending the Roman numeral equivalent for each, from highest to lowest, as in the following examples:
The largest number that can be represented in this manner is 3,999 (Template:Rn), but this is sufficient for the values for which Roman numerals are commonly used today, such as year numbers:
For larger numbers (4,000 and larger): Both before and after the introduction of Arabic numerals in the West, from ancient times through medieval and modern, users of Roman numerals have used various means to write larger numbers Template:Xref.
Other forms
Forms exist that vary in one way or another from the general standard represented above.
The two conventions could be mixed in the same document or inscription, even in the same numeral. For example, on the numbered gates to the Colosseum, Template:Rn is systematically used instead of Template:Rn, but subtractive notation is used for Template:Rn; consequently, gate 44 is labelled Template:Rn.[15][16]
Several monumental inscriptions created in the early 20th century use variant forms for "1900" (usually written Template:Rn). These vary from Template:Rn for 1910 as seen on Admiralty Arch, London, to the more unusual, if not unique Template:Rn for 1903, on the north entrance to the Saint Louis Art Museum.[22]
The ROMAN() function in Microsoft Excel supports multiple subtraction modes depending on the "Template:Tt" setting. For example, the number "499" (usually Template:Rn) can be rendered as Template:Rn ((500-50)+(50-5)+(5-1)), Template:Rn ((500-10)+(10-1)), Template:Rn ((500-5)+(5-1)) or Template:Rn (500-1). The relevant Microsoft help page offers no explanation for this function other than to describe its output as "more concise".[33]
There are also historical examples of other additive and multiplicative forms, and forms which seem to reflect spoken phrases. Some of these variants may have been regarded as errors even by contemporaries.
Template:Rn was how people associated with the XXII Roman Legion used to write their number. The practice may have been due to a common way to say "twenty-second" in Latin, namely Script error: No such module "Lang". (literally "two and twentieth") rather than the "regular" Script error: No such module "Lang". (twenty second).[35] Apparently, at least one ancient stonecutter mistakenly thought that the Template:Rn of "22nd Legion" stood for 18, and "corrected" it to Template:Rn.[35]
Other numerals that do not fit the usual patterns – such as Template:Rn for 45, instead of the usual Template:Rn — may be due to scribal errors, or the writer's lack of familiarity with the system, rather than being genuine variant usage.
Non-numeric combinations
As Roman numerals are composed of ordinary alphabetic characters, there may sometimes be confusion with other uses of the same letters. For example, "XXX" and "XL" have other connotations in addition to their values as Roman numerals, while "IXL" more often than not is a gramogram of "I excel", and is in any case not an unambiguous Roman numeral.[36]
Zero
As a non-positional numeral system, Roman numerals have no "place-keeping" zeros. Furthermore, the system as used by the Romans lacked a numeral for the number zero itself (that is, what remains after 1 is subtracted from 1). The word Template:Wikt-lang (the Latin word meaning "none") was used to represent 0, although the earliest attested instances are medieval. For instance Dionysius Exiguus used Script error: No such module "Lang". alongside Roman numerals in a manuscript from 525 AD.[37][38] About 725, Bede or one of his colleagues used the letter Template:Rn, the initial of Script error: No such module "Lang". or of Template:Wikt-lang (the Latin word for "nothing") for 0, in a table of epacts, all written in Roman numerals.[39]
The use of Template:Rn to indicate "none" long survived in the historic apothecaries' system of measurement: used well into the 20th century to designate quantities in pharmaceutical prescriptions.[40]
In later times, the Arabic numeral "0" has been used as a zero to open enumerations with Roman numbers. Examples include the 24-hour Shepherd Gate Clock from 1852 and tarot packs such as the 15th-century Sola Busca and the 20th century Rider–Waite packs.
Fractions
File:Vecchi 003.jpgA Script error: No such module "Lang". coin (<templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄3 or <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />4⁄12 of an Script error: No such module "Lang".). Note the four dots (····) indicating its value.File:Semisse.jpgA Script error: No such module "Lang". coin (<templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄2 or <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />6⁄12 of an Script error: No such module "Lang".). Note the Template:Rn indicating its value.
The base "Roman fraction" is Template:Rn, indicating <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄2. The use of Template:Rn (as in Template:Rn to indicate <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />7+1⁄2) is attested in some ancient inscriptions[41] and in the now rare apothecaries' system (usually in the form Template:Rn):[40] but while Roman numerals for whole numbers are essentially decimal, Template:Rn does not correspond to <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />5⁄10, as one might expect, but <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />6⁄12.
The Romans used a duodecimal rather than a decimal system for fractions, as the divisibility of twelve (12 = 22 × 3) makes it easier to handle the common fractions of <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄3 and <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄4 than does a system based on ten (10 = 2 × 5). Notation for fractions other than <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄2 is mainly found on surviving Roman coins, many of which had values that were duodecimal fractions of the unit Script error: No such module "Lang".. Fractions less than <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄2 are indicated by a dot (·) for each Script error: No such module "Lang". "twelfth", the source of the English words inch and ounce; dots are repeated for fractions up to five twelfths. Six twelfths (one half), is Template:Rn for Script error: No such module "Lang". "half". Uncia dots were added to Template:Rn for fractions from seven to eleven twelfths, just as tallies were added to Template:Rn for whole numbers from six to nine.[42] The arrangement of the dots was variable and not necessarily linear. Five dots arranged like (⁙) (as on the face of a die) are known as a quincunx, from the name of the Roman fraction/coin. The Latin words Script error: No such module "Lang". and Script error: No such module "Lang". are the source of the English words sextant and quadrant.
Each fraction from <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄12 to <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />12⁄12 had a name in Roman times; these corresponded to the names of the related coins:
Script error: No such module "Lang". orScript error: No such module "Lang".
"Less a quarter" (Script error: No such module "Lang". → Script error: No such module "Lang".) or "ninth ounce" (Script error: No such module "Lang". → Script error: No such module "Lang".)
Script error: No such module "Lang". orScript error: No such module "Lang".
"Less a sixth" (Script error: No such module "Lang". → Script error: No such module "Lang".) or "ten ounces" (Script error: No such module "Lang". → Script error: No such module "Lang".)
"<templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1+1⁄2 uncias" (Script error: No such module "Lang". + Script error: No such module "Lang".)
Fractions could also be indicated with a slash through the last letter in a numeral (e.g. Template:Rn), which subtracted the number by an amount less than one (usually <templatestyles src="Fraction/styles.css" />1⁄2).[43]
Large numbers
The modern form can only write numbers up to 3999, and without M in early Roman times only numbers up to 899 could be written. Various schemes have been used over time to write larger numbers.
Using the Script error: No such module "Lang". method,[44] 500 is written as Template:Rn, while 1,000 is written as Template:Rn.[45] This system of encasing numbers to denote thousands (imagine the Template:Rns and Template:Rns as parentheses) had its origins in Etruscan numeral usage.
File:Roman numerals Bungus 1584-1585.pngPage from a 16th-century manual, showing a mixture of Script error: No such module "Lang". and Script error: No such module "Lang". numbers (see in particular the ways of writing 10,000).
The vinculum came into use in the late Republic,[48] and it was a common alternative to the apostrophic ↀ during the Imperial era around the Roman world (M for '1000' was not in use until the Medieval period).[49][50] It continued in use in the Middle Ages, though it became known more commonly as Script error: No such module "Lang".,[51] and it appears in modern editions of classical and medieval Latin texts.[52][53]
In an extension of the Script error: No such module "Lang"., a three-sided box (now sometimes printed as two vertical lines and a Script error: No such module "Lang".) is used to multiply by 100,000,[54][48] thus:
Script error: No such module "Lang". notation is distinct from the custom of adding an overline to a numeral simply to indicate that it is a number. Both usages can be seen on Roman inscriptions of the same period and general location, such as on the Antonine Wall.[55][56]
Other
There are some examples of year numbers after 1000 written as two Roman numerals 1–99, e.g. 1613 as Template:Rn, corresponding to the common reading "sixteen thirteen" of such year numbers in English, or 1519 as Template:Rn as in Frenchquinze-cent-dix-neuf (fifteen-hundred and nineteen), and similar readings in other languages.[57]
In some French texts from the 15th century and later, one finds constructions like Template:Rn for 99, reflecting the French reading of that number as Script error: No such module "Lang". (four-score and nineteen).[57] Similarly, in some English documents one finds, for example, 77 written as "Template:Rn" (which could be read "three-score and seventeen").[58]
A medieval accounting text from 1301 renders numbers like 13,573 as "Template:Rn", that is, "13×1000 + 5×100 + 3×20 + 13".[59]
Origin
The system is closely associated with the ancient city-state of Rome and the Empire that it created. However, due to the scarcity of surviving examples, the origins of the system are obscure and there are several competing theories, all largely conjectural.
Etruscan numerals
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
Rome was founded sometime between 850 and 750 BC, next to the southern edge of the Etruscan domain, which covered a large part of north-central Italy.
The Roman numerals, in particular, are directly derived from the Etruscan number symbols: Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr, and Template:Angbr for 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 (they had more symbols for larger numbers, but it is unknown which symbol represents which number). As in the basic Roman system, the Etruscans wrote the symbols that added to the desired number, from higher to lower value. Thus, the number 87, for example, would be written 50 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 5 + 1 + 1 = 𐌣𐌢𐌢𐌢𐌡𐌠𐌠 (this would appear as 𐌠𐌠𐌡𐌢𐌢𐌢𐌣 since Etruscan was written from right to left.)[60]
The symbols Template:Angbr and Template:Angbr resembled letters of the Etruscan alphabet, but Template:Angbr, Template:Angbr, and Template:Angbr did not. The Etruscans used the subtractive notation, too, but not like the Romans. They wrote 17, 18, and 19 as 𐌠𐌠𐌠𐌢𐌢, 𐌠𐌠𐌢𐌢, and 𐌠𐌢𐌢, mirroring the way they spoke those numbers ("three from twenty", etc.); and similarly for 27, 28, 29, 37, 38, etc. However, they did not write 𐌠𐌡 for 4 (nor 𐌢𐌣 for 40), and wrote 𐌡𐌠𐌠, 𐌡𐌠𐌠𐌠 and 𐌡𐌠𐌠𐌠𐌠 for 7, 8, and 9, respectively.[60]
The symbol for 100 was written variously as Template:Angbr or Template:Angbr, and was then abbreviated to Template:Angbr or Template:Angbr, with Template:Angbr (which matched the Latin letter C) finally winning out. It might have helped that C was the initial letter of Script error: No such module "Lang"., Latin for "hundred".
Since the Middle Ages, a "Template:Rn" has sometimes been substituted for the final "Template:Rn" of a "lower-case" Roman numeral, such as "Template:Rn" for 3 or "Template:Rn" for 7. This "Template:Rn" can be considered a swash variant of "Template:Rn". Into the early 20th century, the use of a final "Template:Rn" was still sometimes used in medical prescriptions to prevent tampering with or misinterpretation of a number after it was written.[64]
Numerals in documents and inscriptions from the Middle Ages sometimes include additional symbols, which today are called "medieval Roman numerals". Some simply substitute another letter for the standard one (such as "Template:Rn" for "Template:Rn", or "Template:Rn" for "Template:Rn"), while others serve as abbreviations for compound numerals ("Template:Rn" for "Template:Rn", or "Template:Rn" for "Template:Rn"). Although they are still listed today in some dictionaries, they are long out of use.[43]
A superscript "o" (sometimes written directly above the symbol) was sometimes used as an ordinal indicator.[65]
By the 11th century, Arabic numerals had been introduced into Europe from al-Andalus, by way of Arab traders and arithmetic treatises. Roman numerals, however, proved very persistent, remaining in common use in the West well into the 14th and 15th centuries, even in accounting and other business records (where the actual calculations would have been made using an abacus). Replacement by their more convenient "Arabic" equivalents was quite gradual, and Roman numerals are still used today in certain contexts. A few examples of their current use are:
[[File:Carlos IV Coin.jpg|thumb|upright=1.1|Spanish Real using Template:Rn instead of Template:Rn as regnal number of [[Charles IV of Spain|Charles Template:Rn of Spain]].|alt=]]
Generational suffixes, particularly in the U.S., for people sharing the same name across generations, such as William Howard Taft IV. These are also usually read as ordinals.
File:Cambridge Main Public Library 1888.jpgThe year of construction of the Cambridge Public Library (Massachusetts, U.S.), 1888, displayed in "standard" Roman numerals on its facade. The year of production of films, television shows and other works of art within the work itself. Outside reference to the work will use regular Arabic numerals.
In education, school grades (in the sense of year-groups rather than test scores) are sometimes referred to by a Roman numeral; for example, "grade Template:Rn" is sometimes seen for "grade 9".
In mathematics (including trigonometry, statistics, and calculus), when a graph includes negative numbers, its quadrants are named using Template:Rn, Template:Rn, Template:Rn, and Template:Rn.[72] These quadrant names signify positive numbers on both axes, negative numbers on the x-axis, negative numbers on both axes, and negative numbers on the y-axis, respectively. The use of Roman numerals to designate quadrants avoids confusion, since Arabic numerals are used for the actual data represented in the graph.
In military unit designation, Roman numerals are often used to distinguish between units at different levels. This reduces possible confusion, especially when viewing operational or strategic level maps. In particular, army corps are often numbered using Roman numerals (for example, the American XVIII Airborne Corps or the Nazi III Panzerkorps) with Arabic numerals being used for divisions and armies.
In music, Roman numerals are used in several contexts:
Movements are often numbered using Roman numerals.
In sport the team containing the "top" players and representing a nation or province, a club or a school at the highest level in (say) rugby union is often called the "1st Template:Rn", while a lower-ranking cricket or American football team might be the "3rd Template:Rn".
In tarot, Roman numerals (with zero) are often used to denote the cards of the Major Arcana.
In Ireland, Roman numerals were used until the late 1980s to indicate the month on postage Franking. In documents, Roman numerals are sometimes still used to indicate the month to avoid confusion over day/month/year or month/day/year formats.
Modern use in European languages other than English
Some uses that are rare or never seen in English-speaking countries may be relatively common in parts of continental Europe and in other regions (e.g. Latin America) that use a European language other than English. For instance:
Capital or small capital Roman numerals are widely used in Romance languages to denote centuries, e.g. the French Script error: No such module "Lang".[74] and the Spanish Script error: No such module "Lang". (not Script error: No such module "Lang".) for "18th century". Some Slavic and Turkic languages (especially in and adjacent to Russia) similarly favour Roman numerals (e.g. Russian Script error: No such module "Lang"., Azeri Script error: No such module "Lang". or Polish Script error: No such module "Lang".[75]). On the other hand, in Turkish and some Central European Slavic languages, like most Germanic languages, one writes "18." (with a period) before the local word for "century" (e.g. Turkish Script error: No such module "Lang"., Czech Script error: No such module "Lang".).
When typing on Russian typewriters, the Roman-numeral "V" was replaced with "У" because the letter "V" was absent in the Russian Cyrillic alphabet. Additionally, the Roman-numeral "I" was replaced with "1", since this letter had been removed from the Russian alphabet by the 1918 reform of orthography. For example, XVIII was typed as ХУ111. This style is sometimes maintained even when typing on a computer, either out of habit or due to the inconvenience of switching between Latin and Russian script for one or two letters.
Mixed Roman and Arabic numerals are sometimes used in numeric representations of dates (especially in formal letters and official documents, but also on tombstones). The month is written in Roman numerals, while the day is in Arabic numerals: "4.Template:Rn.1789" and "Template:Rn.4.1789" both refer unambiguously to 4 June 1789.
Roman numerals are sometimes used to represent the days of the week in hours-of-operation signs displayed in windows or on doors of businesses,[76] and sometimes in railway and bus timetables. Monday, taken as the first day of the week, is represented by Template:Rn. Sunday is represented by Template:Rn. The hours of operation signs are tables composed of two columns where the left column is the day of the week in Roman numerals and the right column is a range of hours of operation from starting time to closing time. In the example case (left), the business opens from 10 AM to 7 PM on weekdays, 10 AM to 5 PM on Saturdays and is closed on Sundays. Note that the listing uses 24-hour time.
Roman numerals may also be used for floor numbering.[77][78] For instance, apartments in central Amsterdam are indicated as 138-Template:Rn, with both an Arabic numeral (number of the block or house) and a Roman numeral (floor number). The apartment on the ground floor is indicated as Script error: No such module "Lang"..
In Italy, where roads outside built-up areas have kilometre signs, major roads and motorways also mark 100-metre subdivisionals, using Roman numerals from Template:Rn to Template:Rn for the smaller intervals. The sign Template:Sfrac thus marks 17.9 km.
A notable exception to the use of Roman numerals in Europe is in Greece, where Greek numerals (based on the Greek alphabet) are generally used in contexts where Roman numerals would be used elsewhere.
Unicode
The "Number Forms" block of the Unicode computer character set standard has a number of Roman numeral symbols in the range of code points from U+2160 to U+2188.[79] This range includes both upper- and lowercase numerals, as well as pre-combined characters for numbers up to 12. One justification for the existence of pre-combined numbers is to facilitate the setting of multiple-letter numbers (such as VIII) on a single horizontal line in Asian vertical text. The Unicode standard, however, includes special Roman numeral code points for compatibility only, stating that "[f]or most purposes, it is preferable to compose the Roman numerals from sequences of the appropriate Latin letters".[80] The block also includes some Script error: No such module "Lang". symbols for large numbers, an old variant of "Template:Rn" (50) similar to the Etruscan character, the Claudian letter "reversed C", etc.[81]
Aczel, Amir D. 2015. Finding Zero: A Mathematician's Odyssey to Uncover the Origins of Numbers. 1st edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goines, David Lance. A Constructed Roman Alphabet: A Geometric Analysis of the Greek and Roman Capitals and of the Arabic Numerals. Boston: D.R. Godine, 1982.
Houston, Stephen D. 2012. The Shape of Script: How and Why Writing Systems Change. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.
Taisbak, Christian M. 1965. "Roman numerals and the abacus." Classica et medievalia 26: 147–60.
↑ abTemplate:Cite Wikisource Book II, Section 4: "Script error: No such module "Lang"." Book II, Section 8: "Script error: No such module "Lang"." Book IV, Section 15: "Script error: No such module "Lang"." Book VII, Section 4: "Script error: No such module "Lang"."
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".Title of a Plate: "Campana a XXIIII hominibus pulsata" ("Bell to be sounded by 24 men").
↑Template:Cite Wikisource Book III: "Script error: No such module "Lang"." Book IV: "Script error: No such module "Lang"." Book VI: "Script error: No such module "Lang"."
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Copy in the British Library; 149 pages. Page 24: "Script error: No such module "Lang".viz.HeScript error: No such module "Lang".ShinScript error: No such module "Lang".SegalScript error: No such module "Lang".Dagesh, Script error: No such module "Lang"."
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Page 123: "Script error: No such module "Lang".". Page 126, end of the same document: "Script error: No such module "Lang".".
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Page 16, line 1: "Script error: No such module "Lang".". Page 41, upper right corner: "Script error: No such module "Lang".". Page 42, upper left corner: "Script error: No such module "Lang".". Page 70: "Script error: No such module "Lang".". Page 71: "Script error: No such module "Lang"..
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Page 39: "Script error: No such module "Lang"."
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Title page: "Script error: No such module "Lang".".
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Page 26: "Script error: No such module "Lang".: Script error: No such module "Lang"."
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". Title page of first edition: "Script error: No such module "Lang".".
↑ abTemplate:Cite thesis On page 396 it discusses many coins with "Leg. IIXX" and notes that it must be Legion 22. The footnote on that page says: "The form IIXX clearly reflecting the Latin Script error: No such module "Lang". 'twenty-second': cf. X5398, Script error: No such module "Lang".; VI 1551, Script error: No such module "Lang".; III 14207.7, Script error: No such module "Lang".; and III 10471-3, a vexillation drawn from four German legions including 'XVIII PR' – surely here the stonecutter's hypercorrection for IIXX PR.
↑ abScript error: No such module "Citation/CS1". Page 347: Script error: No such module "Lang"." Page 356: Script error: No such module "Lang"." Page 374: Script error: No such module "Lang".: "Script error: No such module "Lang". ['fifteen hundred thirty-two'] Script error: No such module "Lang"." Page 419: Script error: No such module "Lang".".
↑Script error: No such module "citation/CS1". 544 pages. Page 184 has the computation in pounds:shillings:pence (li:s:d) x:iii:iiii + xxi:viii:viii + xlv:xiiii:i = iiixxxvii:vi:i, i.e. 10:3:4 + 21:8:8 + 45:14:1 = 77:6:1.