Naked singularity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Shocksingularity
Added to a new category
 
imported>Monkbot
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Hypothetical phenomenon}}
{{Short description|Hypothetical phenomenon}}
{{About||the novel|A Naked Singularity|the movie|Naked Singularity (film)}}
{{About||the novel|A Naked Singularity|the movie|Naked Singularity (film)}}{{Distinguish|text="naked" black holes like [[Abell 2744-QSO1|QSO1]] with no surrounding galaxy}}
 
In [[general relativity]], a '''naked singularity''' is a hypothetical [[gravitational singularity]] without an [[event horizon]].
In [[general relativity]], a '''naked singularity''' is a hypothetical [[gravitational singularity]] without an [[event horizon]].


Line 8: Line 7:
The theoretical existence of naked singularities is important because their existence would mean that it would be possible to observe the collapse of an object to ''infinite density''. It would also cause foundational problems for general relativity, because general relativity cannot make predictions about the evolution of [[spacetime]] near a singularity. In generic black holes, this is not a problem, as an outside viewer cannot observe the spacetime within the event horizon.
The theoretical existence of naked singularities is important because their existence would mean that it would be possible to observe the collapse of an object to ''infinite density''. It would also cause foundational problems for general relativity, because general relativity cannot make predictions about the evolution of [[spacetime]] near a singularity. In generic black holes, this is not a problem, as an outside viewer cannot observe the spacetime within the event horizon.


Naked singularities have not been observed in nature. Astronomical observations of black holes indicate that their rate of rotation falls below the threshold to produce a naked singularity (spin parameter 1). [[GRS 1915+105]] comes closest to the limit, with a spin parameter of 0.82-1.00.<ref name=space>{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/3141-pushing-limit-black-hole-spins-phenomenal-rate.html|title=Pushing the Limit: Black Hole Spins at Phenomenal Rate|publisher=space.com|access-date=2017-11-25|author=Jeanna Bryne|date=20 November 2006 }}</ref> It is hinted that [[GRO J1655−40]] could be a naked singularity.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Bhattacharyya |first2=S. |date=2018-08-28 |title=Does the gravitomagnetic monopole exist? A clue from a black hole x-ray binary |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043021 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=98 |issue=4 |pages=043021|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043021|arxiv=1712.01156 }}</ref>
Naked singularities have not been observed in nature. Astronomical observations of black holes indicate that their rate of rotation falls below the threshold to produce a naked singularity (spin parameter 1). [[GRS 1915+105]] comes closest to the limit, with a spin parameter of 0.82-1.00.<ref name=space>{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/3141-pushing-limit-black-hole-spins-phenomenal-rate.html|title=Pushing the Limit: Black Hole Spins at Phenomenal Rate|publisher=space.com|access-date=2017-11-25|author=Jeanna Bryne|date=20 November 2006 }}</ref> It is hinted that [[GRO J1655−40]] could be a naked singularity.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Bhattacharyya |first2=S. |date=2018-08-28 |title=Does the gravitomagnetic monopole exist? A clue from a black hole x-ray binary |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043021 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=98 |issue=4 |article-number=043021|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.98.043021|arxiv=1712.01156 |bibcode=2018PhRvD..98d3021C }}</ref>


According to the [[cosmic censorship hypothesis]], gravitational singularities may not be observable.  If [[loop quantum gravity]] is correct, naked singularities may be possible in nature.
According to the [[cosmic censorship hypothesis]], gravitational singularities may not be observable.  If [[loop quantum gravity]] is correct, naked singularities may be possible in nature.


==Predicted formation==
==Predicted formation==
When a massive star undergoes a [[gravitational collapse]] due to its own immense gravity, the ultimate outcome of this persistent collapse can manifest as either a black hole or a naked singularity. This holds true across a diverse range of physically plausible scenarios allowed by general relativity. The [[Oppenheimer–Snyder model|Oppenheimer–Snyder–Datt]] (OSD) model illustrates the collapse of a spherical cloud composed of homogeneous dust (pressureless matter).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Oppenheimer |first1=J. R. |last2=Snyder |first2=H. |date=1939-09-01 |title=On Continued Gravitational Contraction |journal=Physical Review |volume=56 |issue=5 |pages=455–459 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.56.455|doi-access=free |bibcode=1939PhRv...56..455O }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Datt |first=B. |date=1938-05-01 |title=Über eine Klasse von Lösungen der Gravitationsgleichungen der Relativität |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01374951 |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |language=de |volume=108 |issue=5 |pages=314–321 |doi=10.1007/BF01374951 |issn=0044-3328|url-access=subscription }}</ref> In this scenario, all the matter converges into the spacetime singularity simultaneously in terms of comoving time. Notably, the event horizon emerges before the singularity, effectively covering it. By allowing an inhomogeneous initial density profile, one can demonstrate a significant alteration in the behavior of the horizon. This leads to two distinct potential outcomes arising from the collapse of generic dust: the formation of a black hole, characterized by the horizon preceding the singularity; or the emergence of a naked singularity, where the horizon is delayed. In the case of a naked singularity, this delay enables null geodesics or [[Ray (optics)|light rays]] to escape the central singularity, where density and curvatures diverge, reaching distant observers.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Waugh |first1=B. |last2=Lake |first2=Kayll |date=1988-08-15 |title=Strengths of shell-focusing singularities in marginally bound collapsing self-similar Tolman spacetimes |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1315 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=1315–1316 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1315|pmid=9959270 |url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Waugh |first1=B. |last2=Lake |first2=Kayll |date=1989-09-15 |title=Shell-focusing singularities in spherically symmetric self-similar spacetimes |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2137 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=40 |issue=6 |pages=2137–2139 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2137|pmid=10012048 |url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Joshi |first1=P. S. |last2=Dwivedi |first2=I. H. |date=1993-06-15 |title=Naked singularities in spherically symmetric inhomogeneous Tolman-Bondi dust cloud collapse |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5357 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=47 |issue=12 |pages=5357–5369 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5357|pmid=10015558 |arxiv=gr-qc/9303037 }}</ref> In exploring more realistic scenarios of collapse, one avenue involves incorporating pressures into the model. The consideration of gravitational collapse with non-zero pressures and various models including a realistic equation of state, delineating the specific relationship between the density and pressure within the cloud, has been thoroughly examined and investigated by numerous researchers over the years.<ref>Examples include:
When a massive star undergoes a [[gravitational collapse]] due to its own immense gravity, the ultimate outcome of this persistent collapse can manifest as either a black hole or a naked singularity. This holds true across a diverse range of physically plausible scenarios allowed by general relativity. The [[Oppenheimer–Snyder model|Oppenheimer–Snyder–Datt]] (OSD) model illustrates the collapse of a spherical cloud composed of homogeneous dust (pressureless matter).<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Oppenheimer |first1=J. R. |last2=Snyder |first2=H. |date=1939-09-01 |title=On Continued Gravitational Contraction |journal=Physical Review |volume=56 |issue=5 |pages=455–459 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.56.455|doi-access=free |bibcode=1939PhRv...56..455O }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Datt |first=B. |date=1938-05-01 |title=Über eine Klasse von Lösungen der Gravitationsgleichungen der Relativität |journal=Zeitschrift für Physik |language=de |volume=108 |issue=5 |pages=314–321 |doi=10.1007/BF01374951 |bibcode=1938ZPhy..108..314D |issn=0044-3328}}</ref> In this scenario, all the matter converges into the spacetime singularity simultaneously in terms of comoving time. Notably, the event horizon emerges before the singularity, effectively covering it. By allowing an inhomogeneous initial density profile, one can demonstrate a significant alteration in the behavior of the horizon. This leads to two distinct potential outcomes arising from the collapse of generic dust: the formation of a black hole, characterized by the horizon preceding the singularity; or the emergence of a naked singularity, where the horizon is delayed. In the case of a naked singularity, this delay enables null geodesics or [[Ray (optics)|light rays]] to escape the central singularity, where density and curvatures diverge, reaching distant observers.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Waugh |first1=B. |last2=Lake |first2=Kayll |date=1988-08-15 |title=Strengths of shell-focusing singularities in marginally bound collapsing self-similar Tolman spacetimes |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1315 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=38 |issue=4 |pages=1315–1316 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.38.1315|pmid=9959270 |bibcode=1988PhRvD..38.1315W |url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Waugh |first1=B. |last2=Lake |first2=Kayll |date=1989-09-15 |title=Shell-focusing singularities in spherically symmetric self-similar spacetimes |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2137 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=40 |issue=6 |pages=2137–2139 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2137|pmid=10012048 |bibcode=1989PhRvD..40.2137W |url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Joshi |first1=P. S. |last2=Dwivedi |first2=I. H. |date=1993-06-15 |title=Naked singularities in spherically symmetric inhomogeneous Tolman-Bondi dust cloud collapse |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5357 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=47 |issue=12 |pages=5357–5369 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5357|pmid=10015558 |arxiv=gr-qc/9303037 |bibcode=1993PhRvD..47.5357J }}</ref> In exploring more realistic scenarios of collapse, one avenue involves incorporating pressures into the model. The consideration of gravitational collapse with non-zero pressures and various models including a realistic equation of state, delineating the specific relationship between the density and pressure within the cloud, has been thoroughly examined and investigated by numerous researchers over the years.<ref>Examples include:
*{{Cite journal |last1=Ori |first1=Amos |last2=Piran |first2=Tsvi |date=1987-11-09 |title=Naked singularities in self-similar spherical gravitational collapse |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.59.2137 |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=59 |issue=19 |pages=2137–2140 |doi=10.1103/physrevlett.59.2137 |pmid=10035434 |issn=0031-9007|url-access=subscription }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Ori |first1=Amos |last2=Piran |first2=Tsvi |date=1987-11-09 |title=Naked singularities in self-similar spherical gravitational collapse |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=59 |issue=19 |pages=2137–2140 |doi=10.1103/physrevlett.59.2137 |pmid=10035434 |bibcode=1987PhRvL..59.2137O |issn=0031-9007}}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Ori |first1=Amos |last2=Piran |first2=Tsvi |date=1990-08-15 |title=Naked singularities and other features of self-similar general-relativistic gravitational collapse |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.42.1068 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=42 |issue=4 |pages=1068–1090 |doi=10.1103/physrevd.42.1068 |pmid=10012941 |issn=0556-2821|url-access=subscription }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Ori |first1=Amos |last2=Piran |first2=Tsvi |date=1990-08-15 |title=Naked singularities and other features of self-similar general-relativistic gravitational collapse |journal=Physical Review D |volume=42 |issue=4 |pages=1068–1090 |doi=10.1103/physrevd.42.1068 |pmid=10012941 |bibcode=1990PhRvD..42.1068O |issn=0556-2821}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Magli |first=Giulio |date=1997-07-01 |title=Gravitational collapse with non-vanishing tangential stresses: a generalization of the Tolman - Bondi model |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/026 |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |volume=14 |issue=7 |pages=1937–1953 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/026 |issn=0264-9381|url-access=subscription }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Magli |first=Giulio |date=1997-07-01 |title=Gravitational collapse with non-vanishing tangential stresses: a generalization of the Tolman - Bondi model |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |volume=14 |issue=7 |pages=1937–1953 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/026 |bibcode=1997CQGra..14.1937M |issn=0264-9381}}
*{{Cite journal |last=Magli |first=Giulio |date=1998-10-01 |title=Gravitational collapse with non-vanishing tangential stresses: II. A laboratory for cosmic censorship experiments |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/022 |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |volume=15 |issue=10 |pages=3215–3228 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/022 |issn=0264-9381|arxiv=gr-qc/9711082 }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Magli |first=Giulio |date=1998-10-01 |title=Gravitational collapse with non-vanishing tangential stresses: II. A laboratory for cosmic censorship experiments |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |volume=15 |issue=10 |pages=3215–3228 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/15/10/022 |issn=0264-9381|arxiv=gr-qc/9711082 |bibcode=1998CQGra..15.3215M }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Harada |first=Tomohiro |date=1998-10-09 |title=Final fate of the spherically symmetric collapse of a perfect fluid |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.58.104015 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=58 |issue=10 |page=104015 |doi=10.1103/physrevd.58.104015 |issn=0556-2821|arxiv=gr-qc/9807038 }}
*{{Cite journal |last=Harada |first=Tomohiro |date=1998-10-09 |title=Final fate of the spherically symmetric collapse of a perfect fluid |journal=Physical Review D |volume=58 |issue=10 |article-number=104015 |doi=10.1103/physrevd.58.104015 |issn=0556-2821|arxiv=gr-qc/9807038 |bibcode=1998PhRvD..58j4015H }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Harada |first1=Tomohiro |last2=Nakao |first2=Ken-ichi |last3=Iguchi |first3=Hideo |date=1999-07-20 |title=Nakedness and curvature strength of a shell-focusing singularity in spherically symmetric spacetime with vanishing radial pressure |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/8/315 |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |volume=16 |issue=8 |pages=2785–2796 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/16/8/315 |issn=0264-9381|arxiv=gr-qc/9904073 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Harada |first1=Tomohiro |last2=Nakao |first2=Ken-ichi |last3=Iguchi |first3=Hideo |date=1999-07-20 |title=Nakedness and curvature strength of a shell-focusing singularity in spherically symmetric spacetime with vanishing radial pressure |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |volume=16 |issue=8 |pages=2785–2796 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/16/8/315 |issn=0264-9381|arxiv=gr-qc/9904073 |bibcode=1999CQGra..16.2785H }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Joshi |first1=P. S. |last2=Dwivedi |first2=I. H. |date=January 1999 |title=Initial data and the end state of spherically symmetric gravitational collapse |url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/1/003 |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |language=en |volume=16 |issue=1 |pages=41 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/16/1/003 |issn=0264-9381|arxiv=gr-qc/9804075 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Joshi |first1=P. S. |last2=Dwivedi |first2=I. H. |date=January 1999 |title=Initial data and the end state of spherically symmetric gravitational collapse |journal=Classical and Quantum Gravity |language=en |volume=16 |issue=1 |page=41 |doi=10.1088/0264-9381/16/1/003 |issn=0264-9381|arxiv=gr-qc/9804075 |bibcode=1999CQGra..16...41J }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Jhingan |first1=S. |last2=Magli |first2=G. |date=2000-05-09 |title=Black holes versus naked singularities formation in collapsing Einstein clusters |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.61.124006 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=61 |issue=12 |page=124006 |doi=10.1103/physrevd.61.124006 |issn=0556-2821|arxiv=gr-qc/9902041 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Jhingan |first1=S. |last2=Magli |first2=G. |date=2000-05-09 |title=Black holes versus naked singularities formation in collapsing Einstein clusters |journal=Physical Review D |volume=61 |issue=12 |article-number=124006 |doi=10.1103/physrevd.61.124006 |issn=0556-2821|arxiv=gr-qc/9902041 |bibcode=2000PhRvD..61l4006J }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Gonçalves |first1=Sérgio M. C. V. |last2=Jhingan |first2=Sanjay |date=December 2001 |title=Singularities in Gravitational Collapse with Radial Pressure |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1015285531320 |journal=General Relativity and Gravitation |volume=33 |issue=12 |pages=2125–2149 |doi=10.1023/a:1015285531320 |issn=0001-7701|arxiv=gr-qc/0107054 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Gonçalves |first1=Sérgio M. C. V. |last2=Jhingan |first2=Sanjay |date=December 2001 |title=Singularities in Gravitational Collapse with Radial Pressure |journal=General Relativity and Gravitation |volume=33 |issue=12 |pages=2125–2149 |doi=10.1023/a:1015285531320 |issn=0001-7701|arxiv=gr-qc/0107054 |bibcode=2001GReGr..33.2125G }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Harada |first1=T. |last2=Iguchi |first2=H. |last3=Nakao |first3=K.-I. |date=2002-03-01 |title=Physical Processes in Naked Singularity Formation |journal=Progress of Theoretical Physics |volume=107 |issue=3 |pages=449–524 |doi=10.1143/ptp.107.449 |issn=0033-068X|doi-access=free |arxiv=gr-qc/0204008 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Harada |first1=T. |last2=Iguchi |first2=H. |last3=Nakao |first3=K.-I. |date=2002-03-01 |title=Physical Processes in Naked Singularity Formation |journal=Progress of Theoretical Physics |volume=107 |issue=3 |pages=449–524 |doi=10.1143/ptp.107.449 |issn=0033-068X|doi-access=free |arxiv=gr-qc/0204008 |bibcode=2002PThPh.107..449H }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Giambò |first1=Roberto |last2=Giannoni |first2=Fabio |last3=Magli |first3=Giulio |last4=Piccione |first4=Paolo |date=April 2003 |title=New Solutions of Einstein Equations in Spherical Symmetry: The Cosmic Censor to the Court |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-003-0793-9 |journal=Communications in Mathematical Physics |volume=235 |issue=3 |pages=545–563 |doi=10.1007/s00220-003-0793-9 |issn=0010-3616|arxiv=gr-qc/0204030 }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Giambò |first1=Roberto |last2=Giannoni |first2=Fabio |last3=Magli |first3=Giulio |last4=Piccione |first4=Paolo |date=April 2003 |title=New Solutions of Einstein Equations in Spherical Symmetry: The Cosmic Censor to the Court |journal=Communications in Mathematical Physics |volume=235 |issue=3 |pages=545–563 |doi=10.1007/s00220-003-0793-9 |issn=0010-3616|arxiv=gr-qc/0204030 |bibcode=2003CMaPh.235..545G }}
*{{Cite journal |last1=Giambò |first1=Roberto |last2=Giannoni |first2=Fabio |last3=Magli |first3=Giulio |last4=Piccione |first4=Paolo |date=June 2004 |title=Naked Singularities Formation in the Gravitational Collapse of Barotropic Spherical Fluids |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/b:gerg.0000022388.11306.e1 |journal=General Relativity and Gravitation |volume=36 |issue=6 |pages=1279–1298 |doi=10.1023/b:gerg.0000022388.11306.e1 |issn=0001-7701|arxiv=gr-qc/0303043 }}</ref> They all result in either a black hole or a naked singularity depending on the initial data.
*{{Cite journal |last1=Giambò |first1=Roberto |last2=Giannoni |first2=Fabio |last3=Magli |first3=Giulio |last4=Piccione |first4=Paolo |date=June 2004 |title=Naked Singularities Formation in the Gravitational Collapse of Barotropic Spherical Fluids |journal=General Relativity and Gravitation |volume=36 |issue=6 |pages=1279–1298 |doi=10.1023/b:gerg.0000022388.11306.e1 |issn=0001-7701|arxiv=gr-qc/0303043 |bibcode=2004GReGr..36.1279G }}</ref> They all result in either a black hole or a naked singularity depending on the initial data.


From concepts drawn from [[rotating black hole]]s, it is shown that a singularity, spinning rapidly, can become a ring-shaped object. This results in two event horizons, as well as an [[ergosphere]], which draw closer together as the spin of the singularity increases. When the outer and inner event horizons merge, they shrink toward the rotating singularity and eventually expose it to the rest of the universe.
From concepts drawn from [[rotating black hole]]s, it is shown that a singularity, spinning rapidly, can become a ring-shaped object. This results in two event horizons, as well as an [[ergosphere]], which draw closer together as the spin of the singularity increases. When the outer and inner event horizons merge, they shrink toward the rotating singularity and eventually expose it to the rest of the universe.


A singularity rotating fast enough might be created by the collapse of dust or by a [[supernova]] of a fast-spinning star. Studies of [[pulsar]]s<ref>{{Cite web|last=Crew|first=Bec|title=Naked Singularities Can Actually Exist in a Three-Dimensional Universe, Physicists Predict|url=https://www.sciencealert.com/naked-singularities-can-actually-exist-in-a-three-dimensional-universe-physicists-predict|access-date=2020-09-02|website=ScienceAlert|date=23 May 2017 |language=en-gb}}</ref> and some computer simulations ([[Matthew Choptuik|Choptuik]], 1997) have been performed.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Garfinkle|first1=David|title=Choptuik scaling and the scale invariance of Einstein's equation|journal=Phys. Rev. D|date=1997|volume=56|issue=6|pages=R3169–R3173|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.56.R3169|arxiv = gr-qc/9612015 |bibcode = 1997PhRvD..56.3169G }}</ref> Intriguingly, it is recently reported that some spinning [[white dwarfs]] could realistically transmute into rotating naked singularities or [[black holes]] with a wide range of near- and sub-solar-mass values by capturing asymmetric [[dark matter]] particles.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Bhattacharyya |first2=S. |date=2024-06-05 |title=Near- and sub-solar-mass naked singularities and black holes from transmutation of white dwarfs|url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/06/007 |journal=Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics |volume=2024 |issue=6 |pages=007|doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2024/06/007|arxiv=2401.08462 }}</ref> Similarly, spinning [[neutron stars]] could also be transmuted to slowly spinning near–solar-mass naked singularities by capturing asymmetric dark matter particles, if the accumulated cloud of [[dark matter]] particles in the core of a [[neutron star]] can be modeled as an [[Anisotropy|anisotropic]] [[fluid]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Bhattacharyya |first2=S. |last3=Joshi |first3=P. S.|date=2024-07-22 |title=Low mass naked singularities from dark core collapse|url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/053 |journal=Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics |volume=2024 |issue=7 |pages=053|doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/053|arxiv=2405.08758 }}</ref> In general, the [[precession]] of a [[gyroscope]] and the [[precession]] of orbits of matter falling into a rotating black hole or a naked singularity can be used to distinguish these exotic objects.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Kocherlakota |first2=P. |last3=Joshi |first3=P. S. | date=2017-02-06 |title=Spin precession in a black hole and naked singularity spacetimes |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044006 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=95 |issue=4 |pages=044006|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044006|arxiv=1605.00600 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chakraborty|first1=C. |last2=Kocherlakota |first2=P. |last3=Patil |first3=M. |last4=Bhattacharyya |first4=S. |last5=Joshi |first5=P. S. |last6=Krolak |first6=A.| date=2017-04-12 |title=Distinguishing Kerr naked singularities and black holes using the spin precession of a test gyro in strong gravitational fields|url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084024 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=95 |issue=8 |pages=084024|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084024|arxiv=1611.08808 }}</ref>
A singularity rotating fast enough might be created by the collapse of dust or by a [[supernova]] of a fast-spinning star. Studies of [[pulsar]]s<ref>{{Cite web|last=Crew|first=Bec|title=Naked Singularities Can Actually Exist in a Three-Dimensional Universe, Physicists Predict|url=https://www.sciencealert.com/naked-singularities-can-actually-exist-in-a-three-dimensional-universe-physicists-predict|access-date=2020-09-02|website=ScienceAlert|date=23 May 2017 |language=en-gb}}</ref> and some computer simulations ([[Matthew Choptuik|Choptuik]], 1997) have been performed.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Garfinkle|first1=David|title=Choptuik scaling and the scale invariance of Einstein's equation|journal=Phys. Rev. D|date=1997|volume=56|issue=6|pages=R3169–R3173|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.56.R3169|arxiv = gr-qc/9612015 |bibcode = 1997PhRvD..56.3169G }}</ref> Intriguingly, it is recently reported that some spinning [[white dwarfs]] could realistically transmute into rotating naked singularities or [[black holes]] with a wide range of near- and sub-solar-mass values by capturing asymmetric [[dark matter]] particles.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Bhattacharyya |first2=S. |date=2024-06-05 |title=Near- and sub-solar-mass naked singularities and black holes from transmutation of white dwarfs|url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/06/007 |journal=Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics |volume=2024 |issue=6 |page=007|doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2024/06/007|arxiv=2401.08462 |bibcode=2024JCAP...06..007C }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Adarsha |first1=H. A. |last2=Chakraborty |first2=C. |last3=Bhattacharyya |first3=S. |date=2025-05-15 |title=Accretion inside astrophysical objects: Effects of rotation and viscosity |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103033 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=111 |issue=10 |article-number=103033 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.111.103033 |arxiv=2504.21843 |bibcode=2025PhRvD.111j3033A }}</ref>
Similarly, spinning [[neutron stars]] could also be transmuted to slowly spinning near–solar-mass naked singularities by capturing asymmetric dark matter particles, if the accumulated cloud of [[dark matter]] particles in the core of a [[neutron star]] can be modeled as an [[Anisotropy|anisotropic]] [[fluid]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Bhattacharyya |first2=S. |last3=Joshi |first3=P. S.|date=2024-07-22 |title=Low mass naked singularities from dark core collapse|url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/053 |journal=Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics |volume=2024 |issue=7 |page=053|doi=10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/053|arxiv=2405.08758 |bibcode=2024JCAP...07..053C }}</ref> In general, the [[precession]] of a [[gyroscope]] and the [[precession]] of orbits of matter falling into a rotating black hole or a naked singularity can be used to distinguish these exotic objects.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chakraborty |first1=C. |last2=Kocherlakota |first2=P. |last3=Joshi |first3=P. S. | date=2017-02-06 |title=Spin precession in a black hole and naked singularity spacetimes |url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044006 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=95 |issue=4 |article-number=044006|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.95.044006|arxiv=1605.00600 |bibcode=2017PhRvD..95d4006C }}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chakraborty|first1=C. |last2=Kocherlakota |first2=P. |last3=Patil |first3=M. |last4=Bhattacharyya |first4=S. |last5=Joshi |first5=P. S. |last6=Krolak |first6=A.| date=2017-04-12 |title=Distinguishing Kerr naked singularities and black holes using the spin precession of a test gyro in strong gravitational fields|url=https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084024 |journal=Physical Review D |volume=95 |issue=8 |article-number=084024|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.95.084024|arxiv=1611.08808 |bibcode=2017PhRvD..95h4024C }}</ref>


Mathematician [[Demetrios Christodoulou]], a winner of the [[Shaw Prize]], has shown that contrary to what had been expected, singularities which are not hidden in a black hole could also occur.<ref>{{cite journal|author=D.Christodoulou|title=Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field|journal=Ann. Math.|volume=140|pages=607–653|year=1994|doi=10.2307/2118619|issue=3|jstor=2118619}}</ref> However, he then showed that such "naked singularities" are unstable.<ref name=instability>{{cite journal|author=D. Christodoulou|title=The instability of naked singularities in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field|journal=Ann. Math.|volume=149|pages=183–217| year=1999|doi=10.2307/121023|issue=1|jstor=121023|arxiv=math/9901147|s2cid=8930550}}</ref>
Mathematician [[Demetrios Christodoulou]], a winner of the [[Shaw Prize]], has shown that contrary to what had been expected, singularities which are not hidden in a black hole could also occur.<ref>{{cite journal|author=D.Christodoulou|title=Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field|journal=Ann. Math.|volume=140|pages=607–653|year=1994|doi=10.2307/2118619|issue=3|jstor=2118619}}</ref> However, he then showed that such "naked singularities" are unstable.<ref name=instability>{{cite journal|author=D. Christodoulou|title=The instability of naked singularities in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field|journal=Ann. Math.|volume=149|pages=183–217| year=1999|doi=10.2307/121023|issue=1|jstor=121023|arxiv=math/9901147|s2cid=8930550}}</ref>
Line 45: Line 45:


See [[Kerr–Newman metric]] for a spinning, charged ring singularity.
See [[Kerr–Newman metric]] for a spinning, charged ring singularity.
==Types==
===Globally and locally naked singularities===
[[File:Kerr surfaces.svg |thumb |The [[ring singularity]] of a Kerr black hole is an example of a locally naked singularity.]]
Naked singularities can either be globally or locally naked. A globally naked singularity is visible from infinity, while a locally naked singularity is not due to being hidden behind a horizon.<ref name="harada04">{{Cite journal |last1= Harada|first1= Tomohiro|title= Gravitational collapse and naked singularities|journal= Pramana|date= 2004|url= |volume= 63|issue= 4|pages= 741–753|doi=10.1007/BF02705196|arxiv= gr-qc/0407109|bibcode= 2004Prama..63..741H}}</ref><ref name="mohajan17">{{Cite journal |last1= Mohajan|first1= Haradhan Kumar|title= The Nature of Naked Singularity in Cosmology|journal= Engineering International|date= 2017|url= |volume= 5|issue= |page= 9|doi=10.18034/ei.v5i1.976|doi-access= free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Clarke |first=C. J. S. |title=Naked singularities and causality violations |journal=Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology |volume=1 |date=1984 |bibcode=1984rac..conf..111C |url=https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1984rac..conf..111C |access-date=27 July 2025}}</ref> In other words, a globally naked singularity can have causal effects on asymptotic regions of spacetime, while a locally naked singularity can only affect a finite region.<ref name="jd91">{{Cite journal |last1= Joshi|first1= P. S.|last2= Dwivedi|first2= I. H.|title= The structure of naked singularity in self-similar gravitational collapse|journal= Communications in Mathematical Physics|date= 1992|url= |volume= 146|issue= 2|pages= 333–342|doi=10.1007/BF02102631|bibcode= 1992CMaPh.146..333J}}</ref> Globally and locally naked singularities are the focuses of Penrose's weak and strong [[cosmic censorship hypotheses]] respectively, which theorize that such singularities do not exist.<ref name="harada04" /> In 2017, mathematicians [[Mihalis Dafermos]] and Jonathan Luk mathematically verified that spacetime continues beyond the inner [[Cauchy horizon]] of a black hole, beyond which a locally naked [[BKL singularity]] lies, providing a counterexample to the strong version of the cosmic censorship conjecture by mathematically proving a generic condition under which a locally naked singularity could form.<ref name="dl17">{{cite arXiv |date= 2017|title= The interior of dynamical vacuum black holes I: The <em><C><sup>0</sup></em>-stability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon|eprint=1710.01722 |class=gr-qc|last1= Dafermos|first1= Mihalis|last2= Luk|first2= Jonathan}}</ref>
===Strongly and weakly naked singularities===
Naked singularities can be strongly or weakly naked. A weakly naked singularity is contained within at least one [[photon sphere]], while a strongly naked singularity is not. The strength of a naked singularity is determined by its scalar [[electric charge|charge]] to [[mass]] ratio. When <math>0<q/M<\sqrt3</math>, where <math>q</math> is the singularity's charge and <math>M</math> is its mass, the singularity is weakly naked. When <math>q/M>\sqrt3</math>, the singularity is strongly naked. When <math>q/M=\sqrt3</math>, the singularity is marginally strongly naked and has similar properties to a weakly naked singularity.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1= Gyulchev|first1= Galin|last2= Kunz|first2= Jutta|last3= Nedkova|first3= Petya|last4= Vetsov|first4= Tsvetan|last5= Yazadjiev|first5= Stoytcho|title= Observational signatures of strongly naked singularities: Image of the thin accretion disk|journal= The European Physical Journal C|date= 2020|url= |volume= 80|issue= 11|article-number= 1017|doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08575-7|arxiv= 2003.06943|bibcode= 2020EPJC...80.1017G}}</ref>
Light is lensed differently near a weakly vs strongly naked singularity. Similarly to a Schwarzschild black hole, light around a weakly naked singularity travels around the photon sphere many times, generating many [[relativistic images]] around it. On the other hand, having no photon sphere, a strongly naked singularity does not create any lensed relativistic images. Additionally, like a Schwarzschild black hole, a weakly naked singularity has one [[Einstein ring]] and no radial critical curve, while a strongly naked singularity has either zero or two Einstein rings and does have a radial critical curve.<ref name="htidr24">{{Cite journal |last1= Hossain|first1= Md Khalid|last2= Takizawa|first2= Keita|last3= Islam|first3= Anikul|last4= Das|first4= Shyam|last5= Rahaman|first5= Farook|title= Gravitational deflection of massive body around naked singularity|journal= Nuclear Physics B|date= 2024|url= |volume= 1005|issue= |article-number= 116598|doi=10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116598|bibcode= 2024NuPhB100516598H|doi-access= free}}</ref><ref name="ve02">{{Cite journal |last1= Virbhadra|first1= K. S.|last2= Ellis|first2= G. F. R.|title= Gravitational lensing by naked singularities|journal= Physical Review D|date= 2002|url= |volume= 65|issue= 10|article-number= 103004|doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.65.103004|bibcode= 2002PhRvD..65j3004V}}</ref>


==Effects==
==Effects==
Line 53: Line 63:
The cosmic censorship hypothesis says that every gravitational singularity will remain hidden by its event horizon. [[LIGO]] events, including [[GW150914]], are consistent with these predictions.  Although data anomalies would have resulted in the case of a singularity, the nature of those anomalies remains unknown.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Pretorius|first=Frans|date=2016-05-31|title=Viewpoint: Relativity Gets Thorough Vetting from LIGO|url=https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/52|journal=Physics|language=en|volume=9|page=52 |doi=10.1103/Physics.9.52|doi-access=free}}</ref>
The cosmic censorship hypothesis says that every gravitational singularity will remain hidden by its event horizon. [[LIGO]] events, including [[GW150914]], are consistent with these predictions.  Although data anomalies would have resulted in the case of a singularity, the nature of those anomalies remains unknown.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Pretorius|first=Frans|date=2016-05-31|title=Viewpoint: Relativity Gets Thorough Vetting from LIGO|url=https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/52|journal=Physics|language=en|volume=9|page=52 |doi=10.1103/Physics.9.52|doi-access=free}}</ref>


Some research has suggested that if loop quantum gravity is correct, then naked singularities could exist in nature,<ref>M. Bojowald, [http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2008-4/ ''Living Rev. Rel.'' 8, (2005), 11] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151221011231/http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2008-4/ |date=2015-12-21 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Goswami | first1=Rituparno | last2=Joshi | first2=Pankaj S. | title=Spherical gravitational collapse in N dimensions | journal=Physical Review D | volume=76 | issue=8 | date=2007-10-22 | issn=1550-7998 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.76.084026 | page=084026|arxiv=gr-qc/0608136| bibcode=2007PhRvD..76h4026G | s2cid=119441682 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Goswami | first1=Rituparno | last2=Joshi | first2=Pankaj S. | last3=Singh | first3=Parampreet | title=Quantum Evaporation of a Naked Singularity | journal=Physical Review Letters | volume=96 | issue=3 | date=2006-01-27 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.96.031302 | page=031302| pmid=16486681 |arxiv=gr-qc/0506129| bibcode=2006PhRvL..96c1302G | s2cid=19851285 }}</ref> implying that the cosmic censorship hypothesis does not hold. Numerical calculations<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Eardley | first1=Douglas M. | last2=Smarr | first2=Larry | title=Time functions in numerical relativity: Marginally bound dust collapse | journal=Physical Review D | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=19 | issue=8 | date=1979-04-15 | issn=0556-2821 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.19.2239 | pages=2239–2259| bibcode=1979PhRvD..19.2239E }}</ref> and some other arguments<ref>{{cite journal | last=Królak | first=Andrzej | title=Nature of Singularities in Gravitational Collapse | journal=Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement | volume=136 | year=1999 | issn=0375-9687 | doi=10.1143/ptps.136.45 | pages=45–56| arxiv=gr-qc/9910108 | bibcode=1999PThPS.136...45K |doi-access=free}}</ref> have also hinted at this possibility.
Some research has suggested that if loop quantum gravity is correct, then naked singularities could exist in nature,<ref>M. Bojowald, [http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2008-4/ ''Living Rev. Rel.'' 8, (2005), 11] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151221011231/http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2008-4/ |date=2015-12-21 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Goswami | first1=Rituparno | last2=Joshi | first2=Pankaj S. | title=Spherical gravitational collapse in N dimensions | journal=Physical Review D | volume=76 | issue=8 | date=2007-10-22 | issn=1550-7998 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.76.084026 | article-number=084026|arxiv=gr-qc/0608136| bibcode=2007PhRvD..76h4026G | s2cid=119441682 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last1=Goswami | first1=Rituparno | last2=Joshi | first2=Pankaj S. | last3=Singh | first3=Parampreet | title=Quantum Evaporation of a Naked Singularity | journal=Physical Review Letters | volume=96 | issue=3 | date=2006-01-27 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.96.031302 | article-number=031302| pmid=16486681 |arxiv=gr-qc/0506129| bibcode=2006PhRvL..96c1302G | s2cid=19851285 }}</ref> implying that the cosmic censorship hypothesis does not hold. Numerical calculations<ref>{{cite journal | last1=Eardley | first1=Douglas M. | last2=Smarr | first2=Larry | title=Time functions in numerical relativity: Marginally bound dust collapse | journal=Physical Review D | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=19 | issue=8 | date=1979-04-15 | issn=0556-2821 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.19.2239 | pages=2239–2259| bibcode=1979PhRvD..19.2239E }}</ref> and some other arguments<ref>{{cite journal | last=Królak | first=Andrzej | title=Nature of Singularities in Gravitational Collapse | journal=Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement | volume=136 | year=1999 | issn=0375-9687 | doi=10.1143/ptps.136.45 | pages=45–56| arxiv=gr-qc/9910108 | bibcode=1999PThPS.136...45K |doi-access=free}}</ref> have also hinted at this possibility.


==In fiction==
==In fiction==
* [[M. John Harrison]]'s ''[[Kefahuchi Tract]]'' trilogy of [[science fiction]] novels (''[[Light (novel)|Light]]'', ''[[Nova Swing]]'' and ''[[Empty Space (novel)|Empty Space]]'') centre upon humanity's exploration of a naked singularity.
* [[M. John Harrison]]'s ''Kefahuchi Tract'' trilogy of [[science fiction]] novels (''[[Light (novel)|Light]]'', ''[[Nova Swing]]'' and ''Empty Space'') centre upon humanity's exploration of a naked singularity.
* "Dark Peril", by [[James C. Glass]] (published in ''[[Analog Science Fiction and Fact|Analog]]'' March 2005), is a story about space travelers on an exploratory mission. While they investigate a strange cosmological phenomenon, their two small spacecraft begin to shake, and they are unable to leave the area. One crew member realizes that they are trapped in the [[ergosphere]] of a [[black hole]] or naked singularity. The story describes a cluster of multiple black holes or singularities, and what the crew does to try to survive this seemingly inescapable situation.
* "Dark Peril", by James C. Glass (published in ''[[Analog Science Fiction and Fact|Analog]]'' March 2005), is a story about space travelers on an exploratory mission. While they investigate a strange cosmological phenomenon, their two small spacecraft begin to shake, and they are unable to leave the area. One crew member realizes that they are trapped in the [[ergosphere]] of a [[black hole]] or naked singularity. The story describes a cluster of multiple black holes or singularities, and what the crew does to try to survive this seemingly inescapable situation.
* [[Stephen Baxter (author)|Stephen Baxter]]'s ''[[Xeelee Sequence]]'' features the Xeelee, who create a massive ring that produces a naked singularity. It is used to travel to another universe.
* [[Stephen Baxter (author)|Stephen Baxter]]'s ''[[Xeelee Sequence]]'' features the Xeelee, who create a massive ring that produces a naked singularity. It is used to travel to another universe.
* In the episode titled "[[Daybreak (Battlestar Galactica)|Daybreak]]", the finale of the 2004 reimagined television series [[Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series)|''Battlestar Galactica'']], the Cylon colony orbits a naked singularity.{{Citation needed|date=April 2021}}
* In the episode titled "[[Daybreak (Battlestar Galactica)|Daybreak]]", the finale of the 2004 reimagined television series [[Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series)|''Battlestar Galactica'']], the Cylon colony orbits a naked singularity.{{Citation needed|date=April 2021}}
Line 75: Line 85:


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
* {{cite journal | last1=Werner | first1=M. C. | last2=Petters | first2=A. O. | title=Magnification relations for Kerr lensing and testing cosmic censorship | journal=Physical Review D | volume=76 | issue=6 | date=2007-09-24 | issn=1550-7998 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.76.064024 | page=064024|arxiv=0706.0132v2| bibcode=2007PhRvD..76f4024W | s2cid=119647924 }}
* {{cite journal | last1=Werner | first1=M. C. | last2=Petters | first2=A. O. | title=Magnification relations for Kerr lensing and testing cosmic censorship | journal=Physical Review D | volume=76 | issue=6 | date=2007-09-24 | issn=1550-7998 | doi=10.1103/physrevd.76.064024 | article-number=064024|arxiv=0706.0132v2| bibcode=2007PhRvD..76f4024W | s2cid=119647924 }}
* Pankaj S. Joshi, [https://archive.today/20120525044855/http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=naked-singularities "Do Naked Singularities Break the Rules of Physics?"], ''Scientific American'', January 2009.
* Pankaj S. Joshi, [https://archive.today/20120525044855/http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=naked-singularities "Do Naked Singularities Break the Rules of Physics?"], ''Scientific American'', January 2009.
* Marcus Chown, [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327204.700-fastspinning-black-holes-might-reveal-all.html "Fast-spinning black holes might reveal all"] ''New Scientist'', August 2009.
* Marcus Chown, [https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327204.700-fastspinning-black-holes-might-reveal-all.html "Fast-spinning black holes might reveal all"] ''New Scientist'', August 2009.

Latest revision as of 17:13, 1 October 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about".Script error: No such module "Distinguish". In general relativity, a naked singularity is a hypothetical gravitational singularity without an event horizon.

When there exists at least one causal geodesic that, in the future, extends either to an observer at infinity or to an observer comoving with the collapsing cloud, and in the past terminates at the gravitational singularity, then that singularity is referred to as a naked singularity.[1] In a black hole, the singularity is completely enclosed by a boundary known as the event horizon, inside which the curvature of spacetime caused by the singularity is so strong that light cannot escape. Hence, objects inside the event horizon—including the singularity itself—cannot be observed directly. In contrast, a naked singularity would be observable.

The theoretical existence of naked singularities is important because their existence would mean that it would be possible to observe the collapse of an object to infinite density. It would also cause foundational problems for general relativity, because general relativity cannot make predictions about the evolution of spacetime near a singularity. In generic black holes, this is not a problem, as an outside viewer cannot observe the spacetime within the event horizon.

Naked singularities have not been observed in nature. Astronomical observations of black holes indicate that their rate of rotation falls below the threshold to produce a naked singularity (spin parameter 1). GRS 1915+105 comes closest to the limit, with a spin parameter of 0.82-1.00.[2] It is hinted that GRO J1655−40 could be a naked singularity.[3]

According to the cosmic censorship hypothesis, gravitational singularities may not be observable. If loop quantum gravity is correct, naked singularities may be possible in nature.

Predicted formation

When a massive star undergoes a gravitational collapse due to its own immense gravity, the ultimate outcome of this persistent collapse can manifest as either a black hole or a naked singularity. This holds true across a diverse range of physically plausible scenarios allowed by general relativity. The Oppenheimer–Snyder–Datt (OSD) model illustrates the collapse of a spherical cloud composed of homogeneous dust (pressureless matter).[4][5] In this scenario, all the matter converges into the spacetime singularity simultaneously in terms of comoving time. Notably, the event horizon emerges before the singularity, effectively covering it. By allowing an inhomogeneous initial density profile, one can demonstrate a significant alteration in the behavior of the horizon. This leads to two distinct potential outcomes arising from the collapse of generic dust: the formation of a black hole, characterized by the horizon preceding the singularity; or the emergence of a naked singularity, where the horizon is delayed. In the case of a naked singularity, this delay enables null geodesics or light rays to escape the central singularity, where density and curvatures diverge, reaching distant observers.[6][7][8] In exploring more realistic scenarios of collapse, one avenue involves incorporating pressures into the model. The consideration of gravitational collapse with non-zero pressures and various models including a realistic equation of state, delineating the specific relationship between the density and pressure within the cloud, has been thoroughly examined and investigated by numerous researchers over the years.[9] They all result in either a black hole or a naked singularity depending on the initial data.

From concepts drawn from rotating black holes, it is shown that a singularity, spinning rapidly, can become a ring-shaped object. This results in two event horizons, as well as an ergosphere, which draw closer together as the spin of the singularity increases. When the outer and inner event horizons merge, they shrink toward the rotating singularity and eventually expose it to the rest of the universe.

A singularity rotating fast enough might be created by the collapse of dust or by a supernova of a fast-spinning star. Studies of pulsars[10] and some computer simulations (Choptuik, 1997) have been performed.[11] Intriguingly, it is recently reported that some spinning white dwarfs could realistically transmute into rotating naked singularities or black holes with a wide range of near- and sub-solar-mass values by capturing asymmetric dark matter particles.[12][13] Similarly, spinning neutron stars could also be transmuted to slowly spinning near–solar-mass naked singularities by capturing asymmetric dark matter particles, if the accumulated cloud of dark matter particles in the core of a neutron star can be modeled as an anisotropic fluid.[14] In general, the precession of a gyroscope and the precession of orbits of matter falling into a rotating black hole or a naked singularity can be used to distinguish these exotic objects.[15][16]

Mathematician Demetrios Christodoulou, a winner of the Shaw Prize, has shown that contrary to what had been expected, singularities which are not hidden in a black hole could also occur.[17] However, he then showed that such "naked singularities" are unstable.[18]

Metrics

File:Naked.Singularity,Overextremal.Kerr.Newman,Raytracing.png
Ray traced image of a hypothetical naked singularity in front of a Milky Way background. The parameters of the singularity are M=1, a²+Q²=2M². The singularity is viewed from its equatorial plane at θ=90° (edge on).
File:Black.Hole,Extremal.Kerr.Newman,Raytracing.png
Comparison with an extremal black hole with M=1, a²+Q²=1M²

Disappearing event horizons exist in the Kerr metric, which is a spinning black hole in a vacuum. Specifically, if the angular momentum is high enough, the event horizons could disappear. Transforming the Kerr metric to Boyer–Lindquist coordinates, it can be shown[19] that the r coordinate (which is not the radius) of the event horizon is r±=μ±(μ2a2)1/2, where μ=GM/c2, and a=J/Mc. In this case, "event horizons disappear" means that the solutions are complex for r±, or μ2<a2. However, this corresponds to a case where J exceeds GM2/c (or in Planck units, J>M2), i.e. the spin exceeds what is normally viewed as the upper limit of its physically possible values.

Disappearing event horizons can also be seen with the Reissner–Nordström geometry of a charged black hole. In this metric, it can be shown[20] that the horizons occur at r±=μ±(μ2q2)1/2, where μ=GM/c2, and q2=GQ2/(4πε0c4). Of the three possible cases for the relative values of μ and q, the case where μ2<q2 causes both r± to be complex. This means the metric is regular for all positive values of r, or in other words, the singularity has no event horizon. However, this corresponds to a case where Q/4πε0 exceeds MG (or in Planck units, Q>M), i.e. the charge exceeds what is normally viewed as the upper limit of its physically possible values.

See Kerr–Newman metric for a spinning, charged ring singularity.

Types

Globally and locally naked singularities

File:Kerr surfaces.svg
The ring singularity of a Kerr black hole is an example of a locally naked singularity.

Naked singularities can either be globally or locally naked. A globally naked singularity is visible from infinity, while a locally naked singularity is not due to being hidden behind a horizon.[21][22][23] In other words, a globally naked singularity can have causal effects on asymptotic regions of spacetime, while a locally naked singularity can only affect a finite region.[24] Globally and locally naked singularities are the focuses of Penrose's weak and strong cosmic censorship hypotheses respectively, which theorize that such singularities do not exist.[21] In 2017, mathematicians Mihalis Dafermos and Jonathan Luk mathematically verified that spacetime continues beyond the inner Cauchy horizon of a black hole, beyond which a locally naked BKL singularity lies, providing a counterexample to the strong version of the cosmic censorship conjecture by mathematically proving a generic condition under which a locally naked singularity could form.[25]

Strongly and weakly naked singularities

Naked singularities can be strongly or weakly naked. A weakly naked singularity is contained within at least one photon sphere, while a strongly naked singularity is not. The strength of a naked singularity is determined by its scalar charge to mass ratio. When 0<q/M<3, where q is the singularity's charge and M is its mass, the singularity is weakly naked. When q/M>3, the singularity is strongly naked. When q/M=3, the singularity is marginally strongly naked and has similar properties to a weakly naked singularity.[26]

Light is lensed differently near a weakly vs strongly naked singularity. Similarly to a Schwarzschild black hole, light around a weakly naked singularity travels around the photon sphere many times, generating many relativistic images around it. On the other hand, having no photon sphere, a strongly naked singularity does not create any lensed relativistic images. Additionally, like a Schwarzschild black hole, a weakly naked singularity has one Einstein ring and no radial critical curve, while a strongly naked singularity has either zero or two Einstein rings and does have a radial critical curve.[27][28]

Effects

A naked singularity could allow scientists to observe an infinitely dense material, which would under normal circumstances be impossible according to the cosmic censorship hypothesis. That is, without an event horizon of any kind, naked singularities could actually emit light.[29]

Cosmic censorship hypothesis

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The cosmic censorship hypothesis says that every gravitational singularity will remain hidden by its event horizon. LIGO events, including GW150914, are consistent with these predictions. Although data anomalies would have resulted in the case of a singularity, the nature of those anomalies remains unknown.[30]

Some research has suggested that if loop quantum gravity is correct, then naked singularities could exist in nature,[31][32][33] implying that the cosmic censorship hypothesis does not hold. Numerical calculations[34] and some other arguments[35] have also hinted at this possibility.

In fiction

  • M. John Harrison's Kefahuchi Tract trilogy of science fiction novels (Light, Nova Swing and Empty Space) centre upon humanity's exploration of a naked singularity.
  • "Dark Peril", by James C. Glass (published in Analog March 2005), is a story about space travelers on an exploratory mission. While they investigate a strange cosmological phenomenon, their two small spacecraft begin to shake, and they are unable to leave the area. One crew member realizes that they are trapped in the ergosphere of a black hole or naked singularity. The story describes a cluster of multiple black holes or singularities, and what the crew does to try to survive this seemingly inescapable situation.
  • Stephen Baxter's Xeelee Sequence features the Xeelee, who create a massive ring that produces a naked singularity. It is used to travel to another universe.
  • In the episode titled "Daybreak", the finale of the 2004 reimagined television series Battlestar Galactica, the Cylon colony orbits a naked singularity.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  • The Sleeping God in Peter Hamilton's The Night's Dawn Trilogy is believed to be a naked singularity.
  • In Christopher Nolan's Interstellar the nonexistence of a naked singularity hinders humanity from completing a theory of quantum gravity due to the inaccessibility of experimental data from inside the event horizon.
  • In the visual novel Steins;Gate, a naked singularity is used to compress the digitalized memories of the protagonist into a smaller size, to then be sent back in time with an improvised "time leap machine".
  • In Vonda McIntyre's 1981 Star Trek novel The Entropy Effect, a naked singularity is found to be a side effect of time travel experimentation, and threatens to destroy the universe if the time travel experiments are not stopped before they started.

See also

References

<templatestyles src="Reflist/styles.css" />

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. Examples include:
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
    • Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  14. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  16. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  17. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Hobson, et al., General Relativity an Introduction for Physicists, Cambridge University Press 2007, p. 300-305
  20. Hobson, et al., General Relativity an Introduction for Physicists, Cambridge University Press 2007, p. 320-325
  21. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  22. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  23. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  24. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  25. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  26. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  27. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  28. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  29. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  31. M. Bojowald, Living Rev. Rel. 8, (2005), 11 Template:Webarchive
  32. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  33. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  34. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  35. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".

Further reading

Script error: No such module "Navbox". Template:Portal bar Template:Authority control