Clade: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>DMacks
top: what is the vowel sound?
imported>Materialscientist
m Reverted edits by ~2025-31836-67 (talk) (HG) (3.4.13)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Other uses}}
{{Other uses}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2020}}
[[File:Clade-grade II.svg|thumb|400px| [[Cladogram]] (a branching tree diagram) illustrating the relationships of organisms within groups of taxa known as clades. The vertical line (''stem'') at the base (bottom) represents the [[last common ancestor]]. The blue and orange subgroups are clades, each defined by a common ancestor stem at the base of its respective subgroup (''branch''). The green subgroup alone, however, is ''not'' a clade; it is a [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic group]] relative to the blue subgroup because it excludes the blue branch, which shares the same common ancestor. Together, the green and blue subgroups form a clade.]]
[[File:Clade-grade II.svg|thumb|400px| [[Cladogram]] (a branching tree diagram) illustrating the relationships of organisms within groups of taxa known as clades. The vertical line (''stem'') at the base (bottom) represents the [[last common ancestor]]. The blue and red subgroups are clades, each defined by a common ancestor stem at the base of its respective subgroup (''branch''). The green subgroup alone, however, is ''not'' a clade; it is a [[Paraphyly|paraphyletic]] group relative to the blue subgroup because it excludes the blue branch, which shares the same common ancestor. Together, the green and blue subgroups form a clade.]]


In [[biology]], a '''clade''' ({{etymology|grc|''κλάδος'' (kládos)|branch}}),{{pronunciation needed}} also known as a '''[[Monophyly|monophyletic]] group''' or '''natural group''',<ref>{{cite book |last1=Martin  |first1=Elizabeth |title=A Dictionary of Biology |last2=Hin |first2=Robert |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008}}</ref> is a group of [[organism]]s that is composed of a [[common ancestor]] and all of its descendants.<ref>{{cite book |title=Assembling the Tree of Life |url=https://archive.org/details/assemblingtreeli00crac_335 |url-access=limited |editor-first=Joel |editor-last=Cracraft |editor2-first=Michael J. |editor2-last=Donoghue |chapter=Introduction |page=[https://archive.org/details/assemblingtreeli00crac_335/page/n18 1] |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-19-972960-9}}</ref> Clades are the fundamental unit of [[cladistics]], a modern approach to taxonomy adopted by most biological fields.
In [[biology]], a '''clade''' ({{IPA|en|/kleɪd/}}) ({{etymology|grc|''κλάδος'' (kládos)|branch}}), also known as a '''monophyletic group''' or '''natural group''',<ref>{{cite book |last1=Martin  |first1=Elizabeth |title=A Dictionary of Biology |last2=Hin |first2=Robert |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2008}}</ref> is a group of [[organism]]s that is composed of a [[common ancestor]] and all of its descendants.<ref>{{cite book |title=Assembling the Tree of Life |url=https://archive.org/details/assemblingtreeli00crac_335 |url-access=limited |editor-first=Joel |editor-last=Cracraft |editor2-first=Michael J. |editor2-last=Donoghue |chapter=Introduction |page=[https://archive.org/details/assemblingtreeli00crac_335/page/n18 1] |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-19-972960-9}}</ref> Clades are the fundamental unit of [[cladistics]], a modern approach to [[taxonomy]] adopted by most biological fields.


The common ancestor may be an individual, a [[population]], or a [[species]] ([[extinct]] or [[Extant taxon|extant]]). Clades are nested, one in another, as each branch in turn splits into smaller branches. These splits reflect [[evolutionary history]] as populations diverged and evolved independently. Clades are termed ''monophyletic'' (Greek: "one clan") groups.
The common ancestor may be an individual, a [[population]], or a [[species]] ([[extinct]] or [[Extant taxon|extant]]). Clades are nested, one in another, as each branch in turn splits into smaller branches. These splits reflect [[evolutionary history]] as populations diverged and evolved independently. Clades are termed ''[[Monophyly|monophyletic]]'' (Greek: "one clan") groups.


Over the last few decades, the cladistic approach has revolutionized biological classification and revealed surprising evolutionary relationships among organisms.<ref name="Palmer-2009">{{Cite book |title=Evolution: The Story of Life |last=Palmer |first=Douglas |publisher=University of California Press |year=2009 |location=Berkeley |pages=13}}</ref> Increasingly, taxonomists try to avoid naming [[Taxon|taxa]] that are not clades; that is, taxa that are not [[Monophyly|monophyletic]]. Some of the relationships between organisms that the molecular biology arm of cladistics has revealed include that [[fungi]] are closer relatives to animals than they are to plants, [[archaea]] are now considered different from [[bacteria]], and multicellular organisms may have evolved from archaea.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Pace |first=Norman R. |date=2006-05-18 |title=Time for a change |journal=Nature |volume=441 |issue=7091 |pages=289 |bibcode=2006Natur.441..289P |doi=10.1038/441289a |issn=1476-4687 |pmid=16710401|s2cid=4431143 |doi-access=free }}</ref>
Over the last few decades, the cladistic approach has revolutionized biological classification and revealed surprising evolutionary relationships among organisms.<ref name="Palmer-2009">{{Cite book |title=Evolution: The Story of Life |last=Palmer |first=Douglas |publisher=University of California Press |year=2009 |location=Berkeley |pages=13}}</ref> Increasingly, taxonomists try to avoid naming [[Taxon|taxa]] that are not clades; that is, taxa that are not monophyletic. Some of the relationships between organisms that the molecular biology arm of cladistics has revealed include that [[fungi]] are closer relatives to animals than they are to plants, [[archaea]] are now considered different from [[bacteria]], and multicellular organisms may have evolved from archaea.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Pace |first=Norman R. |date=2006-05-18 |title=Time for a change |journal=Nature |volume=441 |issue=7091 |pages=289 |bibcode=2006Natur.441..289P |doi=10.1038/441289a |issn=1476-4687 |pmid=16710401|s2cid=4431143 |doi-access=free }}</ref>


The term ''clade'' is also used with a similar meaning in other fields besides biology, such as [[historical linguistics]]; see [[Cladistics#In disciplines other than biology|Cladistics § In disciplines other than biology]].
The term ''clade'' is also used with a similar meaning in other fields besides biology, such as [[historical linguistics]]; see [[Cladistics#In disciplines other than biology|Cladistics § In disciplines other than biology]].


==Naming and etymology==
==Naming and etymology==
The term ''clade'' was coined in 1957 by the biologist [[Julian Huxley]] to refer to the result of [[cladogenesis]], the evolutionary splitting of a parent species into two distinct species, a concept Huxley borrowed from [[Bernhard Rensch]].<ref name="Dupuis-1984">{{cite journal | last=Dupuis | first=Claude | year=1984 | title=Willi Hennig's impact on taxonomic thought | journal=Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics | volume=15 | pages=1–24 | doi=10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000245| doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="Huxley-1957">{{cite journal | last = Huxley | first = J. S. | year =1957 | title = The three types of evolutionary process | journal=Nature | volume=180 | issue = 4584 | pages=454–455 | doi=10.1038/180454a0| bibcode=1957Natur.180..454H | s2cid = 4174182 }}</ref>
The term ''clade'' was coined in 1957 by the biologist [[Julian Huxley]] to refer to the result of [[cladogenesis]], the evolutionary splitting of a parent species into two distinct species, a concept Huxley borrowed from [[Bernhard Rensch]].<ref name="Dupuis-1984">{{cite journal | last=Dupuis | first=Claude | year=1984 | title=Willi Hennig's impact on taxonomic thought | journal=Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics | volume=15 | issue=1 | pages=1–24 | doi=10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000245| doi-access=free | bibcode=1984AnRES..15....1D }}</ref><ref name="Huxley-1957">{{cite journal | last = Huxley | first = J. S. | year =1957 | title = The three types of evolutionary process | journal=Nature | volume=180 | issue = 4584 | pages=454–455 | doi=10.1038/180454a0| bibcode=1957Natur.180..454H | s2cid = 4174182 }}</ref>


Many commonly named groups – [[rodent]]s and [[insect]]s, for example – are clades because, in each case, the group consists of a common ancestor with all its descendant branches. Rodents, for example, are a branch of [[mammal]]s that split off after the end of the period when the clade [[Dinosaur]]ia stopped being the dominant terrestrial [[vertebrate]]s 66 million years ago. The original population and all its descendants are a clade. The rodent clade corresponds to the order Rodentia, and insects to the class Insecta. These clades include smaller clades, such as [[chipmunk]] or [[ant]], each of which consists of even smaller clades. The clade "rodent" is in turn included in the mammal, [[vertebrate]] and animal clades.
Many commonly named groups – [[rodent]]s and [[insect]]s, for example – are clades because, in each case, the group consists of a common ancestor with all its descendant branches. Rodents, for example, are a branch of [[mammal]]s that split off after the end of the period when the clade [[Dinosaur]]ia stopped being the dominant terrestrial [[vertebrate]]s 66 million years ago. The original population and all its descendants are a clade. The rodent clade corresponds to the order Rodentia, and insects to the class Insecta. These clades include smaller clades, such as [[chipmunk]] or [[ant]], respectively, each of which consists of even smaller clades. The clade "rodent" is in turn included in the mammal, [[vertebrate]] and animal clades. {{cn|date=August 2025}}


== History of nomenclature and taxonomy ==
== History of nomenclature and taxonomy ==
[[File:Haeckel arbol bn.png|thumb|right|upright|Early phylogenetic tree by [[Ernst Haeckel|Haeckel]], 1866. Groups once thought to be more advanced, such as birds ("Aves"), are placed at the top.]]
[[File:Haeckel arbol bn.png|thumb|right|upright|Early phylogenetic tree by [[Ernst Haeckel|Haeckel]], 1866. Groups once thought to be more advanced, such as birds ("Aves"), are placed at the top.]]


The idea of a clade did not exist in pre-[[Charles Darwin|Darwinian]] [[Linnaean taxonomy]], which was based by necessity only on internal or external [[morphology (biology)|morphological]] similarities between organisms. Many of the better known animal groups in Linnaeus's original ''[[Systema Naturae]]'' (mostly [[vertebrate]] groups) do represent clades. The phenomenon of [[convergent evolution]] is responsible for many cases of misleading similarities in the [[Morphology (biology)|morphology]] of groups that evolved from different lineages.
The idea of a clade did not exist in pre-[[Charles Darwin|Darwinian]] [[Linnaean taxonomy]], which was based by necessity only on internal or external [[morphology (biology)|morphological]] similarities between organisms. Many of the better known animal groups in Linnaeus's original ''[[Systema Naturae]]'' (mostly [[vertebrate]] groups) do represent clades. The phenomenon of [[convergent evolution]] is responsible for many cases of misleading similarities in the [[Morphology (biology)|morphology]] of groups that evolved from different lineages. {{cn|date=August 2025}}


With the increasing realization in the first half of the 19th century that species had changed and split through the ages, classification increasingly came to be seen as branches on the evolutionary [[tree of life (biology)|tree of life]]. The publication of Darwin's [[Evolution|theory of evolution]] in 1859 gave this view increasing weight. In 1876 [[Thomas Henry Huxley]], an early advocate of evolutionary theory, proposed a revised taxonomy based on a concept strongly resembling clades,<ref name="Huxley-1876">Huxley, T.H. (1876): Lectures on Evolution. ''New York Tribune''. Extra. no 36. In Collected Essays IV: pp 46–138 [http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/CE4/LecEvol.html original text w/ figures]</ref> although the term ''clade'' itself would not be coined until 1957 by his grandson, [[Julian Huxley]].
With the increasing realization in the first half of the 19th century that species had changed and split through the ages, classification increasingly came to be seen as branches on the evolutionary [[tree of life (biology)|tree of life]]. The publication of Darwin's [[Evolution|theory of evolution]] in 1859 gave this view increasing weight. In 1876 [[Thomas Henry Huxley]], an early advocate of evolutionary theory, proposed a revised taxonomy based on a concept strongly resembling clades,<ref name="Huxley-1876">Huxley, T.H. (1876): Lectures on Evolution. ''New York Tribune''. Extra. no 36. In Collected Essays IV: pp 46–138 [http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/CE4/LecEvol.html original text w/ figures]</ref> although the term ''clade'' itself would not be coined until 1957 by his grandson, [[Julian Huxley]].
Line 27: Line 27:
He proposed a classification system that represented repeated branchings of the family tree, as opposed to the previous systems, which put organisms on a "ladder", with supposedly more "advanced" organisms at the top.<ref name="Palmer-2009" /><ref name="Evolution 101">"Evolution 101". [http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_10 page 10]. Understanding Evolution website. University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 26 February 2016.</ref>
He proposed a classification system that represented repeated branchings of the family tree, as opposed to the previous systems, which put organisms on a "ladder", with supposedly more "advanced" organisms at the top.<ref name="Palmer-2009" /><ref name="Evolution 101">"Evolution 101". [http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_10 page 10]. Understanding Evolution website. University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 26 February 2016.</ref>


Taxonomists have increasingly worked to make the taxonomic system reflect evolution.<ref name="Evolution 101"/> When it comes to [[Nomenclature#Biology|naming]], this principle is not always compatible with the traditional [[Linnaean taxonomy|rank-based nomenclature]] (in which only taxa associated with a [[Taxonomic rank|rank]] can be named) because not enough ranks exist to name a long series of nested clades. For these and other reasons, [[phylogenetic nomenclature]] has been developed; it is still controversial.
Taxonomists have increasingly worked to make the taxonomic system reflect evolution.<ref name="Evolution 101"/> When it comes to [[Nomenclature#Biology|naming]], this principle is not always compatible with the traditional [[Linnaean taxonomy|rank-based nomenclature]] (in which only taxa associated with a [[Taxonomic rank|rank]] can be named) because not enough ranks exist to name a long series of nested clades. For these and other reasons, [[phylogenetic nomenclature]] has been developed; it is still controversial. {{cn|date=August 2025}}


As an example, see the full current{{when|date=May 2024}} classification of ''[[Anas platyrhynchos]]'' (the mallard duck) with 40 clades from ''[[Eukaryota]]'' down by following [[species:Anas  platyrhynchos|this Wikispecies link]] and clicking on "Expand".
As an example, see the full current{{when|date=May 2024}} classification of ''[[Anas platyrhynchos]]'' (the mallard duck) with 40 clades from ''[[Eukaryota]]'' down by following [[species:Anas  platyrhynchos|this Wikispecies link]] and clicking on "Expand". {{cn|date=August 2025}}


The name of a clade is conventionally a plural, where the singular refers to each member individually. A unique exception is the reptile clade [[Dracohors]], which was made by [[haplology]] from Latin "draco" and "cohors", i.e. "the [[dragon]] [[Cohort (taxonomy)|cohort]]"; its form with a suffix added should be e.g. "dracohortian".
The name of a clade is conventionally a plural, where the singular refers to each member individually. A unique exception is the reptile clade [[Dracohors]], which was made by [[haplology]] from Latin "draco" and "cohors", i.e. "the [[dragon]] [[Cohort (taxonomy)|cohort]]"; its form with a suffix added should be e.g. "dracohortian". {{cn|date=August 2025}}


==Definition==
==Definition==
Line 54: Line 54:
The science that tries to reconstruct phylogenetic trees and thus discover clades is called [[phylogenetics]] or [[cladistics]], the latter term coined by [[Ernst Mayr]] (1965), derived from "clade". The results of phylogenetic/cladistic analyses are tree-shaped diagrams called ''[[cladogram]]s''; they, and all their branches, are phylogenetic hypotheses.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Nixon|first=Kevin C.|author2=Carpenter, James M.|title=On the Other "Phylogenetic Systematics"|journal=Cladistics|date=1 September 2000|volume=16|issue=3|pages=298–318|doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00285.x|pmid=34902935|s2cid=73530548|doi-access=free}}</ref>
The science that tries to reconstruct phylogenetic trees and thus discover clades is called [[phylogenetics]] or [[cladistics]], the latter term coined by [[Ernst Mayr]] (1965), derived from "clade". The results of phylogenetic/cladistic analyses are tree-shaped diagrams called ''[[cladogram]]s''; they, and all their branches, are phylogenetic hypotheses.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Nixon|first=Kevin C.|author2=Carpenter, James M.|title=On the Other "Phylogenetic Systematics"|journal=Cladistics|date=1 September 2000|volume=16|issue=3|pages=298–318|doi=10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00285.x|pmid=34902935|s2cid=73530548|doi-access=free}}</ref>


Three methods of defining clades are featured in [[phylogenetic nomenclature]]: node-, stem-, and apomorphy-based (see [[Phylogenetic nomenclature#Phylogenetic definitions of clade names|Phylogenetic nomenclature§Phylogenetic definitions of clade names]] for detailed definitions).
Three methods of defining clades are featured in [[phylogenetic nomenclature]]: node-, stem-, and apomorphy-based (see [[Phylogenetic nomenclature#Phylogenetic definitions of clade names|Phylogenetic nomenclature]] for detailed definitions). <ref>{{cite book |last1=Cantino |first1=Philip D. |last2=de Queiroz |first2=Kevin |title=Phylogenetic Nomenclature |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2007 |isbn= 978-0429821349|pages=29–35 }}</ref>


== Terminology ==
== Terminology ==
[[File:Primate cladogram.svg|thumb|left|Cladogram of modern primate groups; all tarsiers are haplorhines, but not all haplorhines are tarsiers; all apes are catarrhines, but not all catarrhines are apes; etc.]]
[[File:Primate cladogram.svg|thumb|left|Cladogram of modern primate groups; all tarsiers are haplorhines, but not all haplorhines are tarsiers; all apes are catarrhines, but not all catarrhines are apes; etc.]]
The relationship between clades can be described in several ways:
The relationship between clades can be described in several ways:
* A clade located within a clade is said to be ''nested'' within that clade. In the diagram, the [[Ape|hominoid]] clade, i.e. the apes and humans, is nested within the primate clade.
* A clade located within a clade is said to be ''nested'' within that clade. In the diagram, the [[Ape|hominoid]] clade, i.e. the apes and humans, is nested within the primate clade. {{cn|date=August 2025}}
* Two clades are ''[[Sister group|sisters]]'' if they have an immediate common ancestor. In the diagram, lemurs and lorises are sister clades, while humans and tarsiers are not.
* Two clades are ''[[Sister group|sisters]]'' if they have an immediate common ancestor. In the diagram, lemurs and lorises are sister clades, while humans and tarsiers are not. {{cn|date=August 2025}}
* A clade ''A'' is ''[[Basal (phylogenetics)|basal]]'' to a clade ''B'' if ''A'' branches off the lineage leading to ''B'' before the first branch leading only to members of ''B''. In the adjacent diagram, the [[Strepsirrhini|strepsirrhine]]/[[prosimian]] clade, is basal to the [[Hominoidea|hominoids]]/[[ape]] clade. In this example, both Haplorrhine as prosimians should be considered as most basal groupings. It is better to say that the prosimians are the sister group to the rest of the primates.<ref name="Krell-2004">{{cite journal |last1=Krell |first1=F.-T. |last2=Cranston |first2=P. |year=2004 |title=Which side of the tree is more basal? |journal=Systematic Entomology |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=279–281 |doi=10.1111/j.0307-6970.2004.00262.x |s2cid=82371239 |name-list-style=amp |doi-access=free |bibcode=2004SysEn..29..279K }}</ref> This way one also avoids unintended and misconceived connotations about evolutionary advancement, complexity, diversity and ancestor status, e.g. due to impact of sampling diversity and extinction.{{citation needed|reason=reads as editorial comment|date=March 2019}}<ref name="Krell-2004" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://for-the-love-of-trees.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-ancestors-are-not-among-us.html|title=For the love of trees: The ancestors are not among us|last=Smith|first=Stacey|date=2016-09-19|website=For the love of trees|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> Basal clades should not be confused with stem groupings, as the latter is associated with paraphyletic or unresolved groupings.
* A clade ''A'' is ''[[Basal (phylogenetics)|basal]]'' to a clade ''B'' if ''A'' branches off the lineage leading to ''B'' before the first branch leading only to members of ''B''. In the adjacent diagram, the [[Strepsirrhini|strepsirrhine]]/[[prosimian]] clade, is basal to the [[Hominoidea|hominoids]]/[[ape]] clade. In this example, both Haplorrhine as prosimians should be considered as most basal groupings. It is better to say that the prosimians are the sister group to the rest of the primates.<ref name="Krell-2004">{{cite journal |last1=Krell |first1=F.-T. |last2=Cranston |first2=P. |year=2004 |title=Which side of the tree is more basal? |journal=Systematic Entomology |volume=29 |issue=3 |pages=279–281 |doi=10.1111/j.0307-6970.2004.00262.x |s2cid=82371239 |name-list-style=amp |doi-access=free |bibcode=2004SysEn..29..279K }}</ref> This way one also avoids unintended and misconceived connotations about evolutionary advancement, complexity, diversity and ancestor status, e.g. due to impact of sampling diversity and extinction.{{citation needed|reason=reads as editorial comment|date=March 2019}}<ref name="Krell-2004" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://for-the-love-of-trees.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-ancestors-are-not-among-us.html|title=For the love of trees: The ancestors are not among us|last=Smith|first=Stacey|date=2016-09-19|website=For the love of trees|access-date=2019-03-23}}</ref> Basal clades should not be confused with stem groupings, as the latter is associated with paraphyletic or unresolved groupings.


Line 68: Line 68:
==Viruses==
==Viruses==
[[File:HIV-SIV-phylogenetic-tree straight.svg|right|thumb|[[Phylogenetic tree]] of the SIV and HIV viruses showing clades (subtypes) of the virus.]]
[[File:HIV-SIV-phylogenetic-tree straight.svg|right|thumb|[[Phylogenetic tree]] of the SIV and HIV viruses showing clades (subtypes) of the virus.]]
[[Viruses]], and particularly [[RNA viruses]] form clades.<ref name="Yamaji-2020">{{cite journal |vauthors=Yamaji R, Saad MD, Davis CT, Swayne DE, Wang D, Wong FY, McCauley JW, Peiris JS, Webby RJ, Fouchier RA, Kawaoka Y, Zhang W |title=Pandemic potential of highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4 A(H5) viruses |journal=Reviews in Medical Virology |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=e2099 |date=May 2020 |pmid=32135031 |pmc=9285678 |doi=10.1002/rmv.2099 |url=}}</ref> These are useful in [[epidemiology|tracking the spread of viral infections]]. [[HIV]], for example, has clades called subtypes, which vary in geographical prevalence.<ref name="Stebbing-2003">{{cite journal |vauthors=Stebbing J, Moyle G |title=The clades of HIV: their origins and clinical significance |journal=AIDS Reviews |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=205–13 |date=2003 |pmid=15011999 |doi= |url=}}</ref> HIV subtype (clade) B, for example is predominant in Europe, the Americas and Japan, whereas subtype A is more common in east Africa.<ref name="Sarabia-2019">{{cite journal |vauthors=Sarabia I, Bosque A |title=HIV-1 Latency and Latency Reversal: Does Subtype Matter? |journal=Viruses |volume=11 |issue=12 |date=November 2019 |page=1104 |pmid=31795223 |pmc=6950696 |doi=10.3390/v11121104 |url= |doi-access=free }}</ref>
[[Viruses]], and particularly [[RNA viruses]] form clades.<ref name="Yamaji-2020">{{cite journal |vauthors=Yamaji R, Saad MD, Davis CT, Swayne DE, Wang D, Wong FY, McCauley JW, Peiris JS, Webby RJ, Fouchier RA, Kawaoka Y, Zhang W |title=Pandemic potential of highly pathogenic avian influenza clade 2.3.4.4 A(H5) viruses |journal=Reviews in Medical Virology |volume=30 |issue=3 |article-number=e2099 |date=May 2020 |pmid=32135031 |pmc=9285678 |doi=10.1002/rmv.2099 |url=}}</ref> These are useful in [[epidemiology|tracking the spread of viral infections]]. [[HIV]], for example, has clades called subtypes, which vary in geographical prevalence.<ref name="Stebbing-2003">{{cite journal |vauthors=Stebbing J, Moyle G |title=The clades of HIV: their origins and clinical significance |journal=AIDS Reviews |volume=5 |issue=4 |pages=205–13 |date=2003 |pmid=15011999 |doi= |url=}}</ref> HIV subtype (clade) B, for example is predominant in Europe, the Americas and Japan, whereas subtype A is more common in east Africa.<ref name="Sarabia-2019">{{cite journal |vauthors=Sarabia I, Bosque A |title=HIV-1 Latency and Latency Reversal: Does Subtype Matter? |journal=Viruses |volume=11 |issue=12 |date=November 2019 |page=1104 |pmid=31795223 |pmc=6950696 |doi=10.3390/v11121104 |url= |doi-access=free }}</ref>


== See also ==
== See also ==

Latest revision as of 16:08, 8 November 2025

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses". Template:Use dmy dates

File:Clade-grade II.svg
Cladogram (a branching tree diagram) illustrating the relationships of organisms within groups of taxa known as clades. The vertical line (stem) at the base (bottom) represents the last common ancestor. The blue and red subgroups are clades, each defined by a common ancestor stem at the base of its respective subgroup (branch). The green subgroup alone, however, is not a clade; it is a paraphyletic group relative to the blue subgroup because it excludes the blue branch, which shares the same common ancestor. Together, the green and blue subgroups form a clade.

In biology, a clade (Script error: No such module "IPA".) (Template:Etymology), also known as a monophyletic group or natural group,[1] is a group of organisms that is composed of a common ancestor and all of its descendants.[2] Clades are the fundamental unit of cladistics, a modern approach to taxonomy adopted by most biological fields.

The common ancestor may be an individual, a population, or a species (extinct or extant). Clades are nested, one in another, as each branch in turn splits into smaller branches. These splits reflect evolutionary history as populations diverged and evolved independently. Clades are termed monophyletic (Greek: "one clan") groups.

Over the last few decades, the cladistic approach has revolutionized biological classification and revealed surprising evolutionary relationships among organisms.[3] Increasingly, taxonomists try to avoid naming taxa that are not clades; that is, taxa that are not monophyletic. Some of the relationships between organisms that the molecular biology arm of cladistics has revealed include that fungi are closer relatives to animals than they are to plants, archaea are now considered different from bacteria, and multicellular organisms may have evolved from archaea.[4]

The term clade is also used with a similar meaning in other fields besides biology, such as historical linguistics; see Cladistics § In disciplines other than biology.

Naming and etymology

The term clade was coined in 1957 by the biologist Julian Huxley to refer to the result of cladogenesis, the evolutionary splitting of a parent species into two distinct species, a concept Huxley borrowed from Bernhard Rensch.[5][6]

Many commonly named groups – rodents and insects, for example – are clades because, in each case, the group consists of a common ancestor with all its descendant branches. Rodents, for example, are a branch of mammals that split off after the end of the period when the clade Dinosauria stopped being the dominant terrestrial vertebrates 66 million years ago. The original population and all its descendants are a clade. The rodent clade corresponds to the order Rodentia, and insects to the class Insecta. These clades include smaller clades, such as chipmunk or ant, respectively, each of which consists of even smaller clades. The clade "rodent" is in turn included in the mammal, vertebrate and animal clades. Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

History of nomenclature and taxonomy

File:Haeckel arbol bn.png
Early phylogenetic tree by Haeckel, 1866. Groups once thought to be more advanced, such as birds ("Aves"), are placed at the top.

The idea of a clade did not exist in pre-Darwinian Linnaean taxonomy, which was based by necessity only on internal or external morphological similarities between organisms. Many of the better known animal groups in Linnaeus's original Systema Naturae (mostly vertebrate groups) do represent clades. The phenomenon of convergent evolution is responsible for many cases of misleading similarities in the morphology of groups that evolved from different lineages. Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

With the increasing realization in the first half of the 19th century that species had changed and split through the ages, classification increasingly came to be seen as branches on the evolutionary tree of life. The publication of Darwin's theory of evolution in 1859 gave this view increasing weight. In 1876 Thomas Henry Huxley, an early advocate of evolutionary theory, proposed a revised taxonomy based on a concept strongly resembling clades,[7] although the term clade itself would not be coined until 1957 by his grandson, Julian Huxley.

German biologist Emil Hans Willi Hennig (1913–1976) is considered to be the founder of cladistics.[8] He proposed a classification system that represented repeated branchings of the family tree, as opposed to the previous systems, which put organisms on a "ladder", with supposedly more "advanced" organisms at the top.[3][9]

Taxonomists have increasingly worked to make the taxonomic system reflect evolution.[9] When it comes to naming, this principle is not always compatible with the traditional rank-based nomenclature (in which only taxa associated with a rank can be named) because not enough ranks exist to name a long series of nested clades. For these and other reasons, phylogenetic nomenclature has been developed; it is still controversial. Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

As an example, see the full currentTemplate:When classification of Anas platyrhynchos (the mallard duck) with 40 clades from Eukaryota down by following this Wikispecies link and clicking on "Expand". Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

The name of a clade is conventionally a plural, where the singular refers to each member individually. A unique exception is the reptile clade Dracohors, which was made by haplology from Latin "draco" and "cohors", i.e. "the dragon cohort"; its form with a suffix added should be e.g. "dracohortian". Script error: No such module "Unsubst".

Definition

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

File:Cladogram Crocodilia NL.PNG
Gavialidae, Crocodylidae and Alligatoridae are clade names that are here applied to a phylogenetic tree of crocodylians.

A clade is by definition monophyletic, meaning that it contains one ancestor which can be an organism, a population, or a species and all its descendants.[note 1][10][11] The ancestor can be known or unknown; any and all members of a clade can be extant or extinct.

Clades and phylogenetic trees

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

The science that tries to reconstruct phylogenetic trees and thus discover clades is called phylogenetics or cladistics, the latter term coined by Ernst Mayr (1965), derived from "clade". The results of phylogenetic/cladistic analyses are tree-shaped diagrams called cladograms; they, and all their branches, are phylogenetic hypotheses.[12]

Three methods of defining clades are featured in phylogenetic nomenclature: node-, stem-, and apomorphy-based (see Phylogenetic nomenclature for detailed definitions). [13]

Terminology

File:Primate cladogram.svg
Cladogram of modern primate groups; all tarsiers are haplorhines, but not all haplorhines are tarsiers; all apes are catarrhines, but not all catarrhines are apes; etc.

The relationship between clades can be described in several ways:

  • A clade located within a clade is said to be nested within that clade. In the diagram, the hominoid clade, i.e. the apes and humans, is nested within the primate clade. Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  • Two clades are sisters if they have an immediate common ancestor. In the diagram, lemurs and lorises are sister clades, while humans and tarsiers are not. Script error: No such module "Unsubst".
  • A clade A is basal to a clade B if A branches off the lineage leading to B before the first branch leading only to members of B. In the adjacent diagram, the strepsirrhine/prosimian clade, is basal to the hominoids/ape clade. In this example, both Haplorrhine as prosimians should be considered as most basal groupings. It is better to say that the prosimians are the sister group to the rest of the primates.[14] This way one also avoids unintended and misconceived connotations about evolutionary advancement, complexity, diversity and ancestor status, e.g. due to impact of sampling diversity and extinction.Script error: No such module "Unsubst".[14][15] Basal clades should not be confused with stem groupings, as the latter is associated with paraphyletic or unresolved groupings.

Age

The age of a clade can be described based on two different reference points, crown age and stem age. The crown age of a clade refers to the age of the most recent common ancestor of all of the species in the clade. The stem age of a clade refers to the time that the ancestral lineage of the clade diverged from its sister clade. A clade's stem age is either the same as or older than its crown age.Template:Sfn Ages of clades cannot be directly observed. They are inferred, either from stratigraphy of fossils, or from molecular clock estimates.[16]

Viruses

File:HIV-SIV-phylogenetic-tree straight.svg
Phylogenetic tree of the SIV and HIV viruses showing clades (subtypes) of the virus.

Viruses, and particularly RNA viruses form clades.[17] These are useful in tracking the spread of viral infections. HIV, for example, has clades called subtypes, which vary in geographical prevalence.[18] HIV subtype (clade) B, for example is predominant in Europe, the Americas and Japan, whereas subtype A is more common in east Africa.[19]

See also

Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

Notes

  1. A semantic case has been made in 2008 that the name should be "holophyletic", but this term has not acquired widespread use. For more information, see holophyly.

References

Template:Reflist

Bibliography

Template:Refbegin

  • Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".

Template:Refend

External links

Template:Sister project

Script error: No such module "Navbox". Script error: No such module "Navbox".

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. a b Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  6. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  7. Huxley, T.H. (1876): Lectures on Evolution. New York Tribune. Extra. no 36. In Collected Essays IV: pp 46–138 original text w/ figures
  8. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  9. a b "Evolution 101". page 10. Understanding Evolution website. University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
  10. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  11. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  12. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  13. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  14. a b Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  15. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  16. Brower, A. V. Z., Schuh, R. T. 2021. Biological Systematics: Principles and Applications (3rd edn.). Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
  17. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  18. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".
  19. Script error: No such module "Citation/CS1".