Wiki143 talk:Historical archive/Brilliant prose/Refreshing brilliant prose - Science

• Who is the moron who have seen to that every article listing has both a Keep and a Remove vote? We'll come nowhere. -- Sverdrup (talk) 12:22, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
  • I am sorry. Obviously I am wrong. I just misinterpreted the voting style and confused it with that of requests for adminship and other conventionalia. –- Sverdrup (talk) 14:28, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)

• That doesn't seem to be true. I think that the Refreshing brilliant prose pages are more important than VfD. Agrees? r3m0t 12:39, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)

• Let's see, I count 38 articles on which the votes are unanimous so far. I honestly don't know what you are blathering about. -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 12:50, Dec 13, 2003 (UTC)

Start a discussion about Wiki143:Historical archive/Brilliant prose/Refreshing brilliant prose - Science

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on wiki143 the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve Wiki143:Historical archive/Brilliant prose/Refreshing brilliant prose - Science.

Start a discussion