Wiki143:WikiProject Volcanoes/Assessment

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Volcanoes/Sidebar}}

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Volcanoes! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the Template:Tl project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality and Category:WikiProject Volcanoes articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Statistics

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality statistics}}

Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?

Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.

Who can assess articles?

Any member of WikiProject Volcanoes is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.

What if I don't agree with a rating?

You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.

Aren't the ratings subjective?

Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Assessment FAQ

Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the Template:Tl project banner on its talk page:

Template:Tlx

Quality scale

This table is transcluded here, and is identical to the one at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment.

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example

Importance scale

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to volcanologists and others working within the field.

Template:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/row

WikiProject article importance scheme

Importance	Criteria	Example

Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality log

Articles in need of expansion and cleanup

Now that initial assessments have been completed, the most crtitical articles to attend to are those marked with "Top" importance, but only "Start" class (there are no "Stub"s in this category at this time). The most important such article is Volcanology, which is one of the two flagship articles of this WikiProject (along with Volcano) and is sorely in need of comprehensive expansion.

In the "High" importance category, over 20% of the articles are only "Stub" class and another 60% are "Start" class, so these also require attention and expansion.

In general, "B" class articles which are "Mid" importance or higher should be polished up and nominated as good articles.

The easiest way to find articles which fall within a particular intersection of quality and importance categories is to use the Worklist below, which is transcluded from Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality.

See also

• Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality statistics
• Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality log
  • See Wikipedia:WikiProject Volcanoes/Assessment/Log complete for the complete log on a single page, with all dates unlinked so that it can be used as a global watchlist for WikiProject Volcanoes via Special:Recentchangeslinked/Wikipedia:WikiProject Volcanoes/Assessment/Log complete.
• Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Volcanoes articles by quality
• Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot
• Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index
• Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Assessment FAQ