Wiki143:WikiProject Psychology/Assessment

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology/Tabs}}

Template:WP1
{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Psychology articles by quality statistics}}

This is the WikiProject Psychology article assessment page. Our assessments are based on the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, as part of their Work via WikiProjects initiative.

Instructions

Importance

Template:Assessment Importance Summary It is also possible to use Template:Para for this purpose.

Grading scheme

Quality scale

WikiProject content quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example

Importance scale

The article's importance, regardless of its quality

class="import-top " style="text-align:center; color:inherit; background:Template:Importance/colour; " |Top	Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia
class="import-high " style="text-align:center; color:inherit; background:Template:Importance/colour; " |High	Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
class="import-mid " style="text-align:center; color:inherit; background:Template:Importance/colour; " | Mid	Subject fills in more minor details
class="import-low " style="text-align:center; color:inherit; background:Template:Importance/colour; " | Low	Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Psychology/Importance}}

Hall of heroes

This is a space, created October 2021, to commemorate significant efforts in assessment.

• Bibeyjj: added 6 October 2021, for getting quality assessments to 100% and maintaining it there. --Xurizuri (talk) 02:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

See also

• WikiProject Psychology's assessment summary
• A log of recent WikiProject Psychology assessments
• The category for psychology pages
  • The category for psychology lists
  • The category for psychology stubs

Requesting an assessment or re-assessment

What you can accomplish here

This process is to find out whether your article is currently assessed at the correct quality level (Stub, Start, C, B) and correct importance (Low, Mid, High, Top). If you have significantly expanded an article and it is rated below B class, or if you feel the rating is otherwise incorrect, then please feel free to list it below.

What you can NOT accomplish here

• If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, contact the volunteers at WT:PSYCH or list it at Peer review instead.
• If you think the article is particularly well written, then you can nominate it as a possible Good article or even as a possible Featured article.

Add articles here! Newest requests on the BOTTOM, and remember to sign using ~~~~

List

• Quality reassessment of Psychiatric pharmacy (see original request).