Welcome to the assessment department of the WikiProject on Football, which focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Association football related articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the WP:1.0 programme.
The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject?
Just add Template:Tl to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
3. Someone put a Template:Tl template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do?
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
4. Who can assess articles?
Any member of the football WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
5. How do I rate an article?
Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page.
6. Can I request that someone else rate an article?
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
8. Where can I get more comments about an article?
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
10. Aren't the ratings subjective?
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
11. What if I have a question not listed here?
If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, you can go to the main project discussion page.
{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Football articles by quality statistics}}
Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use Wikipedia:Peer review instead.
2012
2012 answered assessments
Jan Suchopárek - Major improvement since its last rating in April 2012. Cloudz679 21:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Millwall F.C.–West Ham United F.C. rivalry - I believe it was a couple of paragraphs when reviewed as 'low' a few years ago. It's been recently made a GA and is now extensive. Deserves a fresh rating. BillyBatty (talk) 05:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Already a GA article. FairyTailRocks 09:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
History of Wigan Athletic F.C. - I made this today by taking the history section and copyediting it. Also made an overhaul of the section on the main WAFC article Tátótát (talk) 20:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Sticking to C-class. The lead should summarize some points of the article. Also some parts are unreferenced. A peer review may help. FairyTailRocks 09:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Demoted to C-class, the structure and grammar of the article needs attention. FairyTailRocks 10:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
List of Southport F.C. seasons - Not been reviewed since i first created it in 2010. Needs work doing to it, but i have a week off to crack on with it. thanks Narom (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Assessed to B-class. I assume that the offline sources are reliable and the "General" sources support the unsourced season. FairyTailRocks 10:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Ralph Milne - added much more info to Dundee Utd section where he was most successful + added references elsewhere ShugSty (talk) 00:14, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Full of references but assessed to C-class. His career statistics are unsourced, also his time with the two other clubs needs expansion. FairyTailRocks 10:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Peter Latchford - Article has been improved substantially over last 6 months ShugSty (talk) 14:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Sticking to start-class. Some bare URLs and some of it are tagged unreliable. FairyTailRocks 10:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Crystal Palace F.C., I've performed an extensive rewrite and would like to see it reviewed again, thanks. HidingT 21:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Already a GA article. FairyTailRocks 10:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Lars Fuchs, recently changed this from stub to C, but was reverted. Would like an independent assessment. Thanks. Madcynic (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Stick to stub, very little information about him. FairyTailRocks 09:59, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Juan Aurich - Improved the lead section, expanded the history section, added a colors and badge section and added a stadium section. A new assessment of the expansion of this article is welcomed. --MicroX (talk) 05:38, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Assessed to C-class. FairyTailRocks 10:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Created talk page. Assessed to Start. FairyTailRocks 09:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
2014
2014 answered assessments
Maccabi Tel Aviv F.C. - After widely enriching the page, I would appreciate a new assessment, thnx.--Ronkinderz (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Demoted to Start-class. It has a few references with almost the whole article may contain original research. FairyTailRocks 09:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
2013–14 I-League - India's top-tier league and just concluded. Can someone please have a look and rate it? Coderzombie (talk) 20:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Graded as C-class. There are some parts which has no sources at all. Thanks. FairyTailRocks 08:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
2014 New England Revolution season - I've been hard at work updating the New England Revolution's current season page. I know it's not some super article, but I believe it's above Stub level at this point. Could someone take a look at give it a new rating, thanks? Nsideris24 (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Graded as C-class. The article has quite a bit of information with proper sources, but it needs to be updated with the rest of the season (i.e. Month by Month only goes til May). Christiangamer7 (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Jérémy Ménez - Article has been vastly improved over the years in terms of content and supporting references, and could potentially be B-class, maybe higher. LRD 13:40, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Graded as a B-Class. This is a well written article that follows the six categories for a B-Class article. Some parts may need to be cleaned up such as the phrase "the second goal was a beautifully worked backheel finish." sounding 5oo much of opinion and not like an encyclopedic entry. Some more sources may be needed to be added before this goes on to be a GA or A-Class article. Christiangamer7 (talk) 07:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Transfer (association football) - I have undertaken the task of majorly improving the article over the last year. It is currently rated as Start-class but I believe it should definitely be higher at this point. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 00:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Upgrading it to C-Class. Although the article has a large amount of references, I personally feel the introduction needs to be shortened and the information inside of it should be made into its own section of the body of the article. I could see this becoming a B-Class article with just a bit more work on it. Christiangamer7 (talk) 07:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Ramiro Corrales - Article has had a large amount of citations added as well as more information added. It is rated as a start class and should at least be a C-class article at this point in time. Christiangamer7 (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. The article has plenty of info plus a decent number of cites. I have changed it to C-class.Barryjjoyce (talk) 01:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Chris Wondolowski - Article was last assessed two years ago, and I think at this point it may be B-class instead of just C-class. If not, some pointers for what to improve would be good. Christiangamer7 (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Red x.svgNot done. This one seems on the bubble between C and B, and could be a solid B with some modest improvements. There is very little info regarding his early MLS career. Cites are ok but there is room for improvement — I've tagged a few places. And the amount of WP:Proseline throughout the text is a bit much. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Agreed. Done. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Australia Cup - Improved the lead section, expanded the trophy section and added a history section. A new assessment of the expansion of this article is welcomed and would appreciate some feedback.--2nyte (talk) 00:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Red x.svgNot done. This article has certainly improved from the Stub that it was in 2014. The article looks to be at the upper end of the Start class, and could be bumped up to C-class following additional modest improvements. The overall length is a bit short, and nine references is ok but could use more. Barryjjoyce (talk) 03:08, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
FC Tosno - The whole article has been entirely rewritten. Oldstone James (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. I changed it from Stub to Start.
TDECU Stadium - This article has been significantly expanded since its last assessment. Brian Reading (talk) 05:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. I changed it from Start to C.
2015
2015 answered assessments
Kiveton Park F.C. - I have added a lot of detail to this article over the last few months and would appreciate any input! Kivo (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Philippines national football team - Article has been substantially expanded especially the history and competitive record sections. Requesting reassessment for possible upgrade to B-class from C-class. Improving the article to become listed FA class in the longer term.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Agreed, it certainly meets B-class now. Not far from GA-class, but it'll take quite a lot of work to get to FA. – PeeJay 21:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Andrea Pirlo - I was hoping the article might be given a high importance rating in WikiProject Football (possibly also WikiProject Italy), thanks! Best, Messirulez (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svgDone. Reassessed for WikiProject Football. C679 03:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Al-Shaab Stadium - I rebuilt the whole article after it was very poor, unorganized and most of it wasn't referenced. I added licensed photos, videos and backed the information with loads of references. I also brought a a lot of information from official responsible people. I hope it gets an assessment for quality scale and the importance one. Hashima20 (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svgDone. Someone has since assessed at C-class, which seems about right. Barryjjoyce (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Lucas Pratto - Article improved in the past month with new headings, sub-headings, new picture, stats and references. Also better writing and style in general. Requesting reassessment regarding Quality and Importance (player has participated for five-years in top-level leagues and has achieved moderate notability by winning awards). Felipe Bini (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
André Hainault - doesn't look like Start-class to me, but I'd appreciate some hints. Madcynic (talk) 19:53, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svgDone. reassessed as C-class. Added tags for improvement. C679 03:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Jagiellonia Białystok - Article has been improved greatly. Any tips on how to improve would be appreciated. Matt918 (talk) 23:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Red x.svgNot done. Prose is not beyond Start-class. C679 21:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Alessandro Del Piero - I know it has been assessed in the past and deemed underserving of an upgrade as the changes suggested were not made by other users, but I have cleaned up this article and am now looking to have this upgraded to GA class; I have actually fixed all the changes suggested - I have taken away most of the POV and flowery language, and I have expanded the article, also adding many more sources. Thanks! Messirulez (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Red x.svgNot done. Article already listed as B-class. If you would like the article checked for a higher assessment, take it to WP:GA. C679 03:41, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
2015–16 FA Cup Qualifying Rounds - Having worked extensively on this page and related others I would be interested to know the standard it has reached and suggestions for improvement.M00036 (talk) 18:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Red x.svgNot done. Prose is not beyond Start-class. Suggestions for improvement exist at the failed GA review. C679 03:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Orlando City SC - Assessed as start-class, but I believe it warrants a C after some moderate citation-adding. Feel free to point me in the right direction if it isn't C-class yet. Somanytictoc (talk) 15:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Stephane Sparagna - The article has been expanded to include up to date statistics as well as a description of his club career to date and his international experience. I am requesting that the article be reassessed and perhaps classed as a Start or C-class. Liam (talk 23:40, 12 December (GMT)
Freddie Woodman - I believe this article is start-class. It's in no danger of deletion, provides reliable sources, and gives the most important info. Thanks for your time, whoever reassess it. --Bobtinin(talk) 16:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Dmitri Alenichev Upgrade importance to at least mid-importance: 6 years in Italy and Portugal, Champions League and UEFA Cup winner, and finnally played in FFA World Cup 2002.--Prandr (talk) 03:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Belgium women's national football team - This article is still marked as "Stub"-class, but it has undoubtedly improved way beyond that! It has probably been C-class quality for a while already, and after many recent edits, I would be so bold as to say it may already be B-class. –Sygmoral (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done C-class as there is still a lot of unsourced sentences, definitely not a stub though. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:41, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Kermit Erasmus - After a substantial number of edits and cleaning I believe this article is no longer a stub and could be considered a C-class. Liam (talk) 10:25, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svgDone. reassessed as C-class. Lead should be lengthened. C679 06:28, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Harry Beadles - Expanded this article quite a bit recently. Wondering if it's worthy of moving up to B-class. Any pointers on improving it would be very welcome as well. Kosack (talk) 09:07, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Ludwig Augustinsson - Have created and worked on this page for a year now, I was wondering if there were chances of receiving a higher grade than C, since it was set when the article were with way less content. // Psemmler (talk) 12:48, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Mahmoud Dahoud - I would like to request this page be graded as C-class in the quality and Mid in the importance scale. Liam (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svgDone. reassessed as C-class, could arguably B-class. Re importance, per WP:FOOTY's importance scale, players generally need to play in a top league for 5 years to get "Mid" importance, so 2 years to go. Macosal (talk) 05:04, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Erin McLeod - I have made substantial edits and expanded this article, and would like to request that is be reassessed for a possible upgrade. Thanks. - Soccerfan1996 (talk) 02:50, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Stéphane Sparagna - substantial editing has been effected to the article, aligning style and reference in such a manner to comply with the requirements of a B-class rating. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 14:00, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Nahikari García - have made numerous edits adding information to body and sourcing references. I feel the page is worthy of C-class rating. Liam E. Bekker (talk) 08:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
FK Tikveš - Hi all, I was wondering if the page can be considered for a possible upgrade to B-class. Kind Regards F00700I (talk) 16:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Francesco Totti - Hello. This article failed the GA review, but I was wondering if it were still good enough to be upgraded from C-class to B-class, as a few editors and I have cleaned up the prose and I have also added many more citations. I was also wondering if it should be upgraded from Mid to High-importance on the WikiProject Football's Importance scale. Thank you! Best regards, Messirulez (talk) 03:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svgDone. Article definitely warrants B-class rating while awaiting GA reviews. Has also been upgraded to high importance Liam E. Bekker (talk) 06:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Paul Pogba - Hello. I was wondering if this article should be upgraded from Mid to High-importance on the WikiProject Football's Importance scale. Thank you! Best regards, Messirulez (talk) 13:43, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Sebastian Giovinco - While the article awaits a GA review, I was wondering if this article warranted an upgrade from C-class to B-class, as a few editors and I have cleaned up the prose and added many more citations. I'm not sure if it warrants an upgrade from Mid to High-importance on the WikiProject Football's Importance scale, but I was also wondering if it should be considered for one. Thank you! Best, Messirulez (talk) 14:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
1954 FIFA World Cup Final I have greatly expanded the article, adding inter alia historical context, background on the Hungarian and German 1954 football teams, material on team preparations and tactics, controversies, relevant developments after the match, as well as quotes and many citations. The article was rated "start" level quality before, I would be grateful for a review. Henry Kaspar (talk) 21:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done Bumped to C class as there are still some unsourced areas, but definitely not start class anymore. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:39, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you - you are fast :-)
As for the unsourced areas, I would be grateful for a little guidance. The only areas were this applied were, in my perception, the "path to the final, Hungary/West Germany" - which mostly lists opponents and results prior to the final, as documented on the main FIFA 1954 World Cup site - and "match - summary", which briefly retells what everyone can see on youtube. Still, I added a reference to the FIFA's 1954 World Cup site, and another to a youtube clip with the full TV coverage. Further sourced the claim that Germany's second goal would not have counted if the referee had called a foul.
There a couple of instances where the language may still be a tad loose and that I would have drafted differently, but I did not want to edit to heavily the work of previous authors out of respect for their efforts. Henry Kaspar (talk) 15:49, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
No problem. In order to achieve a higher rating, the most important things are citations and prose of wording. For a WP:GA class article, almost every sentence should have a source. The prose is also a big factor as it must be neutral and unbiased in its tone. I haven't read the article in detail, but if you feel the wording is too loose or too biased in areas, feel free to edit it; Wikipedia is a collective encyclopedia, no one owns anything. And if anyone objects, hash it out on the talk page. Also the lead could be more comprehensive of the whole article. That's what you would need for a GA nomination to probably pass. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I've taken this to heart, weeded out any remaining traces of loose language, and added more than another dozen or so references - such that every sentence that could possibly be challenged is now sourced. I also added a little to the lead, but would need to think what to sensibly include there. Cheers, HK Henry Kaspar (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Jeff Hendrick - Currently unassessed for some reason. I've done quite a bit of work on this article over the past 5 or 6 months, tidying up the prose, adding citations etc. The big thing it's missing is a picture but that can wait. I think it deserves a B-class Low-Importance rating as I'm quite happy with the current state of the article but happy to go with whatever is decided. Many thanks. Mórtas is Dóchas (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg DoneTemplate:Ping given the (probable) small size of source info, I suspect this is substantial coverage. Desperately needs some inline references though. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 19:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Jagiellonia Białystok I know this article has been reviewed before but I have made extensive additions to the article and added many sources. Any feedback would be helpful. Thanks! Matt918 (talk) 2:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Jordan Cook - This article has been expanded considerably over the past eight months and should be reassessed as it is definitely no longer Start-Class. Thank you. LTFC 95 (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start and maybe it could be a C standard there. Animationis developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg DoneTemplate:Ping Assessed as C-class. The lead could do with expanding and some more inline citations are required, particularly in the Rostov sections, to move up to B-class. Kosack (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. :-) Robby.is.on (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a stub. Animationis developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a stub. Animationis developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Nika Kacharava - unassessed, some works been done on the article to make it complete.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Animationis developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Animationis developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Animationis developing 00:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Ignác Molnár -unassessed, historical football figure.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Not Homura (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Not Homura (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Yusuf Yazıcı - unassessed, some work done on article..--Ortizesp (talk) 21:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done It's seems like it has been already has been done and its a correctly rated as a start. Not Homura (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
1887 FA Cup Final - I added a little bit of information. I'm not sure if it will be any better than 'start' class, but I'd like to know how I could improve it. Birdsgeek 1:20, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
List of Turkish football champions - I vastly enhanced and improved the article. It covers an aspect of Turkish football which is not covered in any other article. So I would like a reassessment. Regards, Akocsg (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
CSV Apeldoorn After expanding the page I would like a re-assessment. I deleted the stub category. Apologies if that was wrong. Also pointers as to how to further improve are more than welcome. --Dutchy45 (talk) 06:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Sheppey United F.C. - after updating this page and adding a lot of content I was hoping this page could be re assessed please. User:Sheppey Red 06:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Template:FlagiconEnugu Rangers - I've significantly updated the history and references for this club and am interested to see where it currently stands and what further improvement is needed (comments welcome on its/my talk page too). SportingFlyertalk 05:26, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
2019
2019 answered assessments
Marcus Rashford - unassessed, the page has gone under many edits from many editors (including myself) since its creation so I believe its time it was assessed. F4JPhantomII (talk) 17:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hekari United - Assessed as stub class but I've done a huge overhaul and is way more than that at this stage. Thanks. MrMarkBGregory (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Dundalk F.C., the page has been completely overhauled and brought up to date with citations from Irish Newspaper Archives added to all historical information. Hoping to ultimately achieve FA if possible - Cheers! Daniel Sexton, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Oriel Park, the page has been overhauled and brought up to date with citations from Irish Newspaper Archives added to all historical information. Hoping to promote from start - Cheers! Daniel Sexton, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
2019 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition nearly completed, article tables not much more to add within a month. Beyond Stub Class?
2018 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition completed, hasnt been assessed since the default rating after article creation.
2014 FFA Cup preliminary rounds, competition completed, hasnt been assessed since the default rating after article creation.
for all of these 6 I have been a major editor, so feel that i'm too close to make any change to assessment class. Cheers. Matilda Maniac (talk) 15:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Ahmed Aloulou, has not received an importance rating yet. 16 October 2019
Kevin Cossette, found this page as a stub with one source. Recently fixed it up, adding much more thorough detail and multiple references and citiations. RedPatchBoy (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
New York Generals, found this page as a stub with no sources. Recently performed a large edit on it, added several references and in-line citations. Think it may qualify for more than stub-class at this point. Thanks! JJonahJackalope (talk) 06:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Atlanta Chiefs, similar to above, performed a large overhaul on this page some time ago, think it may qualify for more than start-class. JJonahJackalope (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
PAOK FC, performed a large edit on this page, added a lot of references, tables and tags. I'd be interested in a re-assessment and how to further improve it. Thanks! Abudabanas (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Sportbrüder Leipzig, changed from a stub into a full-blown article. Lots of citations added and over 7,000 characters added. I'm struggling to find more info. on the team at all, so just curious whether you think it appropriate to rate this as a B-class article or not. Thanks in advance! Allenthalben (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
I think this would most probably be a C-class article.Because as you said there is not much info to be found on this article which I don't think would be substantial enough however I would be interested to here others take on this. Until then I have changed its rating to a C-class REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I've managed to find a bit more information by crawling through old newspapers, but I believe I've found all that I can now. I have taken a look at some B-class articles and they do seem to be substantially long, so I think I would agree with C for this. Allenthalben (talk) 04:15, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Ezgjan Alioski, yet to be reviewed despite playing at a high level - I think it is start class but I'd probably like somebody else's take on it SFletcher06 (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Chris Katjiukua - I significantly expanded this article as part of The 1000 Destubbing Challenge and reassessed as a Start class, though I feel it is probably a C class. I never like to assess articles I've added significant amounts to so I would appreciate it somebody else have a look at it. SFletcher06 (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Penn State Nittany Lions men's soccer Completed a very large edit to this page, cleaned up and stylized as well as added tons of history. Would love to see where it stands. Thanks y'all! NoahRiffe (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
2019 Allsvenskan Looks like it was assessed only at the beginning of the season, so it would be interesting to see how it fares now. Would be nice if one could also give a small rationale for the decided classification. --Mango från yttre rymden (talk) 13:55, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Detroit City FC - This has not been re-assessed since 2014. The club has gone professional since then and the article has been almost completely rewritten and sourced. Pirmas697 (talk) 14:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
2020 Beijing Sinobo Guoan F.C. season - Have been continuously editing the article as the season progresses and the article is now filled with more details than when it was originally assessed. Would love to get a quick assessment and see how it matches up to the standards. Thank you!
It is currently rated "C-class" and I would agree with that after looking over the article. Cheers! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Senegalese Football Federation - This article has almost entirely been rewritten and sourced over the last 6 months, with its scope, details, media and references dramatically expanded, compared to the time of its previous rating. I would love to have the article graded to see how it fairs. Thanks! Fzzey08 (talk) 05:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Gustavo Hamer I have mostly rewritten this article since it was classed as a stub. It now has decent detail on all of his career. I think it needs updating from 'stub' class. Thanks. Skybluecm (talk) 23:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
FC Santa Claus, I've updated this article quite a bit, from an article with 2 references to 30+, since every year around this time it naturally attracts significant attention, including from news sites. Not a stub class anymore. RedPatchBoy (talk) 18:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Caroline Graham Hansen had been graded as C before I took a look, and I rated the rest as C as well. I feel the first article is the closest to B-class but they all need a bit of polish to get to that next class level. Christiangamer7 (talk) 21:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
2022
2022 answered assessments
PAS Giannina F.C. This article has been extensively edited in the previous weeks, and important content has been added. PAS Giannina is a top club playing on the Greek Super League 1. This club is regarded as one of the best in Greece and has very rich, "different" and interesting history, since its foundation, in 1966. PAS Giannina has participated on European games against notable teams, and has a very wide and very strong fanbase across Europe, Oceania, South America and Africa. It also has one of the best fanbases in Greece and a very atmospheric home stadium. With many world class and well known footballers having played for PAS Giannina, including Euro 2004 champion Giourkas Seitaridis, greek international Konstantinos Mavropanos, Zenit's legend Yuri Lodygin and many more. Last but not least, Ajax Amsterdam veterans recently visited Ioannina city, in order to participate on an exhibition match against the PAS Giannina veterans, a match also broadcasted by Ajax TV. After these edits, the clubs page has been renewed with tons of information, photos, categories, charts and graphics, similar to those of World class and famous clubs with great attention to detail. For these reasons, considering also the club's impact on the domestic league, on Europe, and the whole world, I believe that the importance of the page, should change from "Mid", to "High", according to the importance scale, and from class "Start", to at least class "GA", if not to class "A", according to the Quality scale, since we are talking about a complete article about a top club.
Manchester City F.C. 3–2 Queens Park Rangers F.C. - this article was only reviewed on 5th May, but a week or so later I added a significant chunk of text (including 36 unique web citations) to close off the main gap in what needed to be added to the article. I will also go one further and add that the gap I had left was in the aftermath impact for City, which is pretty much the main purpose of the article so I'd like to think that my addition carries some weight, at least in regards to getting this article reclassified. Honestly I've never paid much attention to article assessments before so I don't have a clear image of what it should be, but having perused the classifications I'd like to think it's at least worthy of a B-class now, if not perhaps just pushing an GA rating? Of course, if anyone can suggest extra content to add I'd be more than happy to do it, but right now - aside from wording/style/formatting changes - I literally cannot think of what I can add to this article to make it any better. Falastur2Talk 19:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Template:Ping I've cleaned up those Better Citation Needed warnings. What's the next step? Also, sorry to trouble you but any chance of a review of my other nomination, below? Much appreciated! Falastur2Talk 16:44, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Template:U, if you want to bring the article to GA status then the next step would be to nominate it at WP:GAN, instructions can be found at WP:GAI. At first glance the article looks like it would pass but do have some concerns about a couple of the sources, specifically ones sourced by sbnation.com and imdb.com as they are considered to be generally unreliable. That would very likely be raised in a GA review but apart from that I would say go for it and good luck! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Early grounds of Manchester City F.C. - I haven't actually worked on this article in some time, but I believe it's a fairly comprehensive coverage of the material. It's definitely not GA material, but is it worth a B class? I'd like to think so. Falastur2Talk 08:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done, This was a hard one, I having compared it against other similar B-class articles, I think this would just pass and have upped it as such. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Yui Hasegawa — edited considerably since its last assessment as a Stub-class in 2018
File:Yes check.svg Done Assessed as C-class, but could honestly be ready for B-class soon if not already Christiangamer7 (talk) 08:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done Upped to a C class, I have also increased importance level to Mid for football and women’s sport. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Angel Gomes — Hi! I recently edited and developed this article as well as reviewed all the references. It may be promoted as a good article. -AideDésintéressée (talk) 09:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Barkley Miguel Panzo - Hi! I just found that Barkley Miguel Panzo has been using his Wikipedia page as a CV fo years and still uses it to fool various European football clubs[1]. Could you guys help me to either delete it or writing some paragraphs about his Wikipedia controversy that made him known.
Mimis Papaioannou - Since the article was recently listed as Good Article I'm requesting an reassessment for the article's importance from Low-class to Mid-class.BEN917 18:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Yes check.svg Done Assessed as mid in line with "Players or managers that have participated at international level or in a top-level league.". --Christiangamer7 (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Stelios Serafidis - Requesting an reassessment for the article which I created.BEN917 13:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Thomas Mavros - Requesting an reassessment for the article.BEN917 13:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Nikos Goumas - Requesting an assessment for the article which I created.BEN917 13:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here.
Request for review: Draft:ROVA Roșiori de Vede
Hello, dear reviewers! I would kindly like to request a review of my draft: Draft:ROVA Roșiori de Vede, which has been pending since April 7, 2025.
The article is about a Romanian football club with regional significance. I’ve tried to meet the notability guidelines and structured the content according to similar articles. I’ve also submitted it to WikiProject Romania and Football.
Any feedback or help with moving it forward would be greatly appreciated!
