Wiki143:WikiProject Brazil/Assessment/Importance scale

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil/Departments/Header}} {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil/Assessment/Intro}} The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Brazil. Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated. Template:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/rowTemplate:Importance scheme/row WikiProject article importance scheme Importance Criteria Example {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil/Departments

1= white

2= Assessment

3= gold

4= Automation

5= gold

6= Cartography }} {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil/Departments

1= gold

2= Collaboration

3= gold

4= Disputes

5= gold

6= Outreach }} {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Brazil/Departments

1= gold

2= Peer review

3= gold

4= Photography

5= gold

6= Requests }}

Assessment table

{{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Brazil articles by quality statistics}}