Comment The lighting is terrible in this picture. Maybe something could be done with the reflected light of the wall --Muhammad(talk) 15:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Strong Support I can overlook the technical flaws for its massive EV within the project. Although a touch up could help. Either way I still support. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 00:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Regretful Oppose If size was the only concern, I would have supported but the lighting is not ideal and as per the discussion on the talk page, IMO this fails to meet the requirement. --Muhammad(talk) 09:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
All valid points, but don't forget this is used in over 25 articles and has substantial EV, the #1 reason for valued picture status. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 20:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
But if we lower the bar this much, then I'm afraid any picture could be eligible for VP status. IMO the picture should at least look good in thumbnail. --Muhammad(talk) 04:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
See my comment on the talk page. I'm worried that's already the case (though I'm not so worried about quality as much as EV; though that's not to say quality isn't important - but I believe this successfully illustrates the subject)... ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 03:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Bankimoon07052007.jpg --Intothewoods29 (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
