Wiki143:Suspected sock puppets/Smithers, Fetch The Bi-Oculars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Smithers, Fetch The Bi-Oculars

Suspected sock puppeteer

Smithers, Fetch The Bi-Oculars (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Report submission by

• PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Evidence

• See the comments section.

Comments

• I have seen a lot of these rather whimsical usernames blocked by the boatload over the last few days as socks of another user. Sorry I can't be more specific as to which account. I reported this to the usernames page, but it was suggested that I bring it here.

User has no contribs - any more details about this? Cirt (talk) 11:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Pixie dust.png CheckUser is not magic pixie dust, and the same goes for SSP. Unless we have someone to compare this to (and without contribs, that's going to be rather difficult) we have nothing to go on and no reason to take action on this account. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions

• There is nothing for us to do here, since this account has not edited. I suggest this report be closed. EdJohnston (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Closed. Per . Cirt (talk) 12:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

---