Wiki143:Suspected sock puppets/Desperatebree
User:Desperatebree
- Evidence
I presume Murph murph to be a sock puppet of Desperatebree. Desperatebree was blocked for vadalizing pages, adding nonsense and blanking warning of the user's talk page. Desperatebree was warned for changing to an old picture on the Trish Stratus page. After Desperatebree was blocked, Murph murph changed the same picture and blanked warnings on the user talk page. GWatson • TALK 19:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I was not "warned" for changing the picture. The person who thinks they are in charge of the page told me not to change it because it was "too old", so i put up the most recent one and that got deleted too. does that make sense to you. Geez I didnt realise it was a crime to add a picture to improve an article. Murph murph 01:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
As the user recently vandalized my talk page, I would not be suprised by this at all. I'm the admin who blocked User:Desperatebree, and if he continues to act in a similar fashion, I will see no problem with blocking the account as a sockpuppet. AmiDaniel (talk) 22:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
User keeps blanking this page and warnings.
I believe there is another sockpuppet involved. 172.129.203.132 first vandalized Murph murph's page here [1] by claiming Fag that keeps putting up stupid pictures about Murph. Then a few minutes later, 172.129.203.132 turned around and added the exact same picture that Murph had been adding to Trish Stratus (edit is here [2]). Why insult someone about a certain edit and then continue those same edits? IrishGuy 00:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
OK i've just seen this I am so confused. I am not 172.129.203.132. when did 172.129.203.132 insult me. I thought 172.129.203.132 was on my side, he put up the trish pic that I wanted.
um, no i don't otherwise why would all this still be here lol Murph murph 23:57, 2 June 2006 (UTC) This is all because of the person who refuses to let me change the trish stratus picture to a more recent one because they feel they control that page. This person says they like all articles to be updated and current, so i found a recent two week old photo and put it on. But they refuse to let me have it beacsue they did not put it on themselves, or they do not like it!
- Actually, you have blanked this page [3] and you repeatedly continue to blank comments from your own talk page. IrishGuy 00:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Yes but I specifically told you why, and yet you still posted this comment. I told you I was unsure as to the function of the discussion page, and did not realise you cannot delete from a talk page. Murph murph 01:36, 3 June 2006 (UTC)