Wiki143:Suspected sock puppets/Ali doostzadeh
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:Ali doostzadeh
- Evidence
- User Arash the Bowman works in tandem with Ali doostzadeh in eliminating any classical citation or fact contradicting Scytho-Iranian hypothesis. This pattern is repetitive, while Ali doostzadeh vandalises a part of an article, Arash the Bowman vandalises another part, until no trace of contribution remains. This tandem process is intendended to prevent the contents from scrutiny of the community. Ali doostzadeh created other sock puppets in the past to circumvent rv rules and create impression that users other then militant Iranian nationalists participate in vandalizing the contents
- After I repeatedly asked Ali doostzadeh to stop vandalising the contents, and posted vandalism warning, the deletions were switched to other users, User Arash the Bowman being one of them.
- After I restore the vandalized section, to avoid Wikipedia rv rule, Ali doostzadeh uses other proxies to re-vandalize the page. See history of Scythia for repeat vandalism about source, development, and constituent people of Scythia
- Comments
.
Nope thats not me.. stop accusing. You were totally dismissed in the Scytho-Iranian theory and that is why the administrators deleted it. As per Scythia, your information was false. I copied it in the talk page and then afterwards refuted it and you did not provide a reply. --Ali doostzadeh 00:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I can also safely say that Arash the Bowman is not Ali doostzadeh. I have interacted with Arash before I interacted with Ali, and I can say with a degree of certainty that they are not the same person, just by the way they talk. Ali doostzadeh has put a lot of work into Wikipedia, and has earned the respect of many, he would not be the type of person to do something like this, however, this is just speculation.Khosrow II 00:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- I have yet to see any evidence, just a list of accusations. Just because Arash and Ali are working in tandem doesn't mean they are sockpuppets of the same person --- if anything, you would want to accuse them of Wikistalking, but I accuse them only of correcting the horrendously slanted or outright fabricated contributions of an extreme POV warrior. If they are sockpuppets, then so am I for trying to fix the outrageously bad (grammatically, syntactically, stylistically and factually) article on the Ossetic language. Cuff me and block my username. --Jpbrenna 07:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry you are wrong on this. I am not Ali. Your suspicion only proves the fact that there are different people who believe your comments to be without historical value and fabricated to serve a certain point of view. Think about it. Arash the Bowman 10:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
point to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ali doostzadeh (3rd)
- Evidence
- User Khosrow II works in tandem with Ali doostzadeh in eliminating any classical citation or fact contradicting Scytho-Iranian hypothesis. Khosrow II plays a dispatch center, coordinating organized vandalism and warning participants of the group about an article to be censored. This pattern is repetitive, once Ali doostzadeh vandalises an article, Khosrow II jumps to his defence. This tandem process is intendended to prevent the contents from scrutiny of the community. Ali doostzadeh created other sock puppets in the past to circumvent rv rules and create impression that users other then militant Iranian nationalists participate in vandalizing the contents
- After I repeatedly asked Ali doostzadeh to stop vandalising the contents, and posted vandalism warning, the deletions were switched to other users, coordinated by Khosrow II.
- After I restore the vandalized section, to avoid Wikipedia rv rule, Ali doostzadeh uses other proxies to re-vandalize the page. See history of Scythia for repeat vandalism about source, development, and constituent people of Scythia
- Comments
What, now hes accusing me? Barefact, how about we make a bet, if Ali and I are not the same person, you have to leave Wiki forever. Huh? How about it? Admin's, check our IP's and get this false accusation over with.Khosrow II 14:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- you are not the same person, if you are telling truth.
- You are a train of sock puppets, engaged in wholesome vandalism, ganging up on a subject to its complete elimination, no stupid Herodotus can get into the way of your Iranian censorship. Sockpuppeting is destructive and contrary to Wikipedia rules. Keeping contents from scrutiny of the public is contrary to Wikipedia rules. You do not accept offers of compromise and respect for scholars that do not conform to your enunciated concepts. You prefer force, deception, and vandalism in a sockpuppeting manner.
Barefact 14:57, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Do you accept my wager? Anyway, can an Admin please show this guy our IP's addresses so he'll stop his false accusations. Barefact, if I was Ali, why would I be willing for an Admin to check my IP?Khosrow II 15:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Once again I invite you to accept the situation as it is. There are at least two different people (I don't know if Ali and Khosrow are the same person!) who are convinced that your pan-turkic manipulations are just that: pan-turkic maipulations. This is a serious encyclopedia, where only subjects with general acceptance among scholars is presented, not divergent points of view and attempts to rewrite history to fit ideological POVs. Now please stop accusing people and don't be paranoid. There is no consipiracy against you, just several people that do not accept manipulations of history. I also invite admins to publish my IP nr. to prove that I am not a suckpuppet of anyone. Arash the Bowman 08:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)