Wiki143:Sockpuppet investigations/86.136.176.9/Archive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:86.136.176.9

Template:User-multi

86.136.176.9

Template:Checkuser

Report date January 28 2009, 19:26 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".
  • Script error: No such module "Checkuser".


Evidence submitted by Smallman12q (talk)

The ips are generally very close (masks maybe slightly different). I'm not sure whether they are all indeed the same person, or if it is a shared ip, but if you look at [scottish knights history], you will see that these 86.xxx.xxx.xx have been constantly vandalizing and undoing...and they only edit that particular page. Smallman12q (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users

What is a checkuser going to do, they are IP addresses. If they are vandalizing, just post to WP:AIV to get admins to block. —— nixeagleemail me 19:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

I believe there may be more sockpuppets from a very similar ip. Perhaps a checkuser can find them? (I'm still fairly new to wikipedia...so I may not fully understand all of the policies).Smallman12q (talk) 19:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
So should I report all of these ips to AIV? I don't fully know how to deal with all this.=(Smallman12q (talk) 19:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
As they vandalize, yes. Really the only other option is a range block. To request a range block, either leave a note at WP:AN, or file a quick case so that CheckUsers can check for collateral damage. But, in my opinion AIV is the way to go for the time being. Tiptoety talk 19:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
I will open a quick case then. Thankyou for your help.=DSmallman12q (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


CheckUser requests
Checkuser request – code letter: B (Ongoing serious pattern vandalism )
Current status – File:Symbol unsupport2 vote.svg Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by Smallman12q (talk) 19:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Template:Respond - CheckUser can not tell you anything more than you already know here. All CheckUser does is tell you the IP an account is editing under, and as you already know the IPs there is nothing left to tell. Also, CheckUser can not tell you who is editing via the IP, remember File:Pixie dust.png CheckUser is not magic pixie dust. Tiptoety talk 19:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions
File:Symbol comment vote.svg This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.

Tiptoety talk 20:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Wiki143:Sockpuppet_investigations/86.136.176.9/Archive&oldid=7878013"