Wiki143:Mediation Committee/Nominations/Blankfaze
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of an unsuccessful nomination to join the Mediation Committee. Please do not modify it.
Blankfaze
I've been meaning to get more involved in community issues anyhow (hence why I was running for ArbCom). Well, four MC members were just elected to the Arbitration Committee, so I imagine the MC will probably need a few people with time on their hands and who are willing, which I am. If any of you don't know me, I've been here for eight months, admin for five, see my user page or contributions for more information. I would hope to be as superb a mediator as sannse and ambi have, butthat is truly a lofty goal. Anyhow, I'm willing to take a shot at it. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 19:00, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Mediation committee:
I'll probably support anyway, but have you got any examples of where you've been involved in conflict resolution? It'd be nice to see how you might mediate before making a final verdict.Good enough explanation for me, so support. Ambi 01:07, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)- Admittedly I don't have a whole lot of experience mediating disputes, probably because I try not to get involved in too many of them. However, I do believe myself to be steadfastly able to be neutral and consider all POVs and not let personal opinions influence my editing (for example, I've reverted leftist-stipulation additions to George W. Bush and many other articles even though I oftentimes agreed with them). I think any of the Wikipedians who know me very well would vouch for my neutrality and fairmindedness. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 09:04, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- For the curious, I'd just like to add that I also have an intimate and thorough knowledge of Wikipedia policy, including the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution process. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 09:16, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Admittedly I don't have a whole lot of experience mediating disputes, probably because I try not to get involved in too many of them. However, I do believe myself to be steadfastly able to be neutral and consider all POVs and not let personal opinions influence my editing (for example, I've reverted leftist-stipulation additions to George W. Bush and many other articles even though I oftentimes agreed with them). I think any of the Wikipedians who know me very well would vouch for my neutrality and fairmindedness. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 09:04, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Angela. 05:05, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Support -- sannse (talk) 23:41, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Neutralitytalk 00:54, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Andre (talk) 08:46, Dec 27, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. SweetLittleFluffyThing 11:25, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Danny 20:55, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Outside opinions:
- See my statement above under Snowspinner's application. --Michael Snow 22:31, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Support. --MPerel 02:09, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC) oops! moved my vote to outside opinions. I originally opposed in the Arbcom Elections, but I've recently become more impressed and think MedCom would be a good opportunity to see what BlankFaze can do. He's definitely a very involved editor and admin and committed to Wikipedia.no offense. --MPerel 20:54, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)
- Application denied based on opposition from the MC. -- Jwrosenzweig 23:39, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- The above nomination to join the Mediation Committee is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it.