Wiki143:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2005-12-25 image deletion

Request for cabal mediation

Initial request

Request made by: KittenKlub 22:23, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Where is the issue taking place?

On my talk page User_talk:KittenKlub

Who's involved?

• User:KittenKlub
• User:Sandertje

What's going on?

On December 20, I nominated an image for deletion because I doubted the public domain claim. The user replied, and the next day, he removed the nomination, so I issued him with a warning and told him not to remove it again. He removed this from his talk page twice, and issued me with a warning today.

What would you like to change about that?

He wants to take revenge in one way or another. I'd like the warning deleted from my page and a moderator to tell him to behave, because up to now he just took revenge.

If you'd prefer we work discreetly, how can we reach you?

...

Mediator response

Investigating the issue, will post findings here shortly. Rob Church ^Talk 21:11, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Both users contacted, will proceed when I've feedback from them both. Rob Church ^Talk 21:30, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Notes

The image concerned is Image:OORLOG BEWERKT 5.JPG.

• 21:54, 12 November 2005 - Sandertje uploads Image:OORLOG BEWERKT 5.JPG
• 21:29, 20 December 2005 - KittenKlub tags the image as a PUI
• 21:32, 20 December 2005 - KittenKlub informs Sandertje of the nomination for deletion
• 21:21, 21 December 2005 - KittenKlub responds to Sandertje on Sander's talk page and the Image Deletion page that he doesn't believe "NIOD" is an acceptable excuse, nor a PD qualifier [1]
• 13:46, 22 December 2005 - For blanking the PUI entry for December 20, KittenKlub warns Sandertje on his talk page
• 21:50, 25 December 2005 - Sandertje adds a warning to KittenKlub's talk page
• 21:13, 28 December 2005 - Sandertje posts 2 messages with proof of legitimacy of the pictures.Although the proof is rock hard, Kittenklub chooses to continue the discussion.That is increasingly beginning look as if it were a personal feud.
• 19:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC) - Sandertje issued another warning. Both warnings are deleted by me also since this mediation is going nowhere and I fail to see the use of the mediation cabal when no attempts are made by the mediator. As far as I am concerned this mediation has failed given the fact that nothing is done. All communication with Sandertje will be removed on sight from my talk pages. KittenKlub 19:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

________________________________________________________________________________________

Kittenklub is trying to get away from what he did, by placing his warning in the archives.That's rather unfair of her/him, since when I deleted her/his nonsensical warnings I got another, and another ... not very brave kittenklub.

Sandertje 21:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Mediation closed

Since this is nothing but nonsense because it seems like it just a position to gratify to ego of so called mediators who do nothing at all when handed a request. KittenKlub 23:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Rob Church is hereby dismissed as not qualifying for his position. KittenKlub 23:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Mediation reopened

Kittenklub wanted to solve a problem, and issued a mediation.Now that it's not working out the way he planned, he'closes it' as if he's got that right in the first place.

This conflict is far from over and I would like to ask RobChurch to stick around and keep up the good work!

Sandertje 17:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)