Used in many articles, including India and Taj Mahal. FP image from the Commons. It really has striking colors, highlighting how nice the Taj Mahal looks. --AllyUnion(talk) 10:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
Nominate and support. - AllyUnion(talk) 10:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
This is a very famous image: perhaps featured pictures should be about bringing new images to light? Jdhowens90 10:28, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
The criteria don't mention anything about that. It illustrates the article well, and is certainly striking. Support. Raven4x4x 08:35, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
I do agree with Jdhowens90; It seems rather cliche. -Haon 12:44, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Support - Yes, perfect. Thanks for the reminder, time for a vindaloo. :) --Deglr6328 02:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Support - have seen similar pictures by the dozends, but I am still very impressed by the building. -- Chris 73Talk 07:41, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Support, despite the fact that there are probably hundreds of uploaded picture of the Taj Mahal this is a great photo and works well in the article. JtkieferT | @ | C ----- 19:46, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
Neutral Well taken, but me & every other visitor has this exact photo, maybe a photo that captures it in a different way. I dont know how you can photograph this any other way, but I'd like to see it done. --User:Rakkar
Oppose. Off-centre. Mark1 03:47, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Would support if the view had been from the centre. --Rebroad 17:25, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
Support- beautiful. As some people think of the assymetricality (if that's not a word, it should be) as a bad thing, I think that is what makes the picture great. Hojimachong 02:38, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Promoted Image:Taj Mahal in March 2004.jpg ~ Veledan • Talk+ new 00:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)