Strong Oppose what is this? Poor quality, not to mention it is way too snapshotty. It isn't even of a particular subject. All-around not FP quality. JuliancoltonThe storm still blows... 22:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
The image is about river pollution and slums adjusent to river. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
River pollution? That is not an FP worthy subject. And above all, the technical quality isn't good. JuliancoltonThe storm still blows... 22:47, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
River pollution is not FP worthy? You are saying only a nice image of a river will be FP worthy, not the negative aspect like pollution? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose River pollution is a fine subject for FP, but this particular photo is not FP quality. Not the best composition and there's all sorts of weird chromatic aberration and other things that seem strange-looking but I don't know the technical names for. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose due to poor focus and lighting. Highly reproducible shots like this should be much higher quality/resolution. Cacophony (talk) 05:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose technically really poor/nothing for FP. —αἰτίας•discussion• 22:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)